Open main menu

And so on and so forth...Edit

ANEdit

 
I bitz yur artikl till it ded then I delete it.
In memory of content writer Richard Arthur Norton, lynched at AN after 13 years and 6 months at Wikipedia.

I’ve unblocked and opened the discussion about RAN again per your concerns. Just as a personal note, I can assure you that getting it done in the dark or anything of the sort was not on my mind (I don’t typically celebrate Father’s Day so it wasn’t even on my mind.) My biggest concern in situations like these is being respectful to everyone involved, and when it appears likely to be a blood bath I typically side on ending it quickly. Enough people have expressed a desire to comment to change the situation, though, so opening it again makes sense. Thanks for raising the issue. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:52, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

June events with WIREdit

June 2019, Volume 5, Issue 6, Numbers 107, 108, 122, 123, 124, 125


Check out what's happening in June at Women in Red:

Virtual events:


Other ways you can participate:


Subscription options: Opt-in/Opt-out

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:41, 22 May 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

License tagging for File:Munro-donald-l-08.jpgEdit

Thanks for uploading File:Munro-donald-l-08.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:30, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

CommentEdit

What an interesting and informative user page, thank you. Well thought out rules and regs. Came here after the current controversy page, and found the depth of caring you have for Wikipedia. Thanks again. Randy Kryn (talk) 03:15, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Gronlund-Laurence.jpg listed for discussionEdit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gronlund-Laurence.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Snowycats (talk) 15:20, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

You know I read ...Edit

There's a thread from last year titled "Google’s AI-Powered War on Trolls". Is the tool you are now mocking "son of" or "return of"? Asking for a friend. Yeah ... that's the ticket. Yngvadottir (talk) 11:25, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

Yngvadottir, I was going to say that I remembered playing with this tool before, but I couldn't place it. No idea as to the specifics of your question. I presume that the idea of that tool will come back again and again in never-improving form, especially since WMF are now also our overseers, not being content to simply reap the bounty of our labor. You should pop in at WPO now and again, it would make Crow (even more) crazy, if nothing else. best, —tim Carrite (talk) 14:22, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
BTW, this message: 1.00 Not Attack, 0.99 Not Aggressive. Carrite (talk) 14:27, 23 June 2019 (UTC)

July events from Women in Red!Edit

July 2019, Volume 5, Issue 7, Numbers 107, 108, 126, 127, 128


Check out what's happening in July at Women in Red...

Virtual events:


Initiatives we support:


Editor feedback:


Social media:   Facebook /   Instagram /   Pinterest /   Twitter

Subscription options: Opt-in/Opt-out

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:39, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

New Page Review newsletter July-August 2019Edit

Hello Carrite,

WMF at work on NPP Improvements

More new features are being added to the feed, including the important red alert for previously deleted pages. This will only work if it is selected in your filters. Best is to 'select all'. Do take a moment to check out all the new features if you have not already done so. If anything is not working as it should, please let us know at NPR. There is now also a live queue of AfC submissions in the New Pages Feed. Feel free to review AfCs, but bear in mind that NPP is an official process and policy and is more important.

QUALITY of REVIEWING

Articles are still not always being checked thoroughly enough. If you are not sure what to do, leave the article for a more experienced reviewer. Please be on the alert for any incongruities in patrolling and help your colleagues where possible; report patrollers and autopatrolled article creators who are ostensibly undeclared paid editors. The displayed ORES alerts offer a greater 'at-a-glance' overview, but the new challenges in detecting unwanted new content and sub-standard reviewing do not necessarily make patrolling any easier, nevertheless the work may have a renewed interest factor of a different kind. A vibrant community of reviewers is always ready to help at NPR.

Backlog

The backlog is still far too high at between 7,000 and 8,000. Of around 700 user rights holders, 80% of the reviewing is being done by just TWO users. In the light of more and more subtle advertising and undeclared paid editing, New Page Reviewing is becoming more critical than ever.

Move to draft

NPR is triage, it is not a clean up clinic. This move feature is not limited to bios so you may have to slightly re-edit the text in the template before you save the move. Anything that is not fit for mainspace but which might have some promise can be draftified - particularly very poor English and machine and other low quality translations.

Notifying users

Remember to use the message feature if you are just tagging an article for maintenance rather than deletion. Otherwise articles are likely to remain perma-tagged. Many creators are SPA and have no intention of returning to Wikipedia. Use the feature too for leaving a friendly note note for the author of a first article you found well made or interesting. Many have told us they find such comments particularly welcoming and encouraging.

PERM

Admins are now taking advantage of the new time-limited user rights feature. If you have recently been accorded NPR, do check your user rights to see if this affects you. Depending on your user account preferences, you may receive automated notifications of your rights changes. Requests for permissions are not mini-RfAs. Helpful comments are welcome if absolutely necessary, but the bot does a lot of the work and the final decision is reserved for admins who do thorough research anyway.

Other news

School and academic holidays will begin soon in various places around the Western world. Be on the lookout for the usual increase in hoax, attack, and other junk pages.

Our next newsletter might be announcing details of a possible election for co-ordinators of NPR. If you think you have what it takes to micro manage NPR, take a look at New Page Review Coordinators - it's a job that requires a lot of time and dedication.


Stay up to date with even more news – subscribe to The Signpost.
Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:38, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

I will not be doing any New Page Patrolling until the Fram Affair is settled properly. Carrite (talk) 04:48, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

  The Special Barnstar
For your superb work as to the RX thread:-) WBGconverse 17:10, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Shucks, I haven't got a barnstar in years! Carrite (talk) 17:18, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Template:1912 NCAA independents football recordsEdit

Hi Carrite.

Do you have any sourcing on this edit[1] of Template:1912 NCAA independents football records? (re "Removes Washington, Washington State, Oregon, Oregon State, and Idaho, who, together with Whitman College of Walla Walla, comprised the Northwest Conference in 1912")

and related expansion of Northwest Intercollegiate Athletic Association?

Stipulated we often have contradictory sourcing and modern accounts can be incomplete, misleading, or wrong. And football affiliations can differ from other sports. I do observe this change does not align with other existing content, less Oregon State which is tagged with [clarification needed][better source needed]:

Cheers, UW Dawgs (talk) 02:06, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

Hey UW Dawgs, yeah, categorizing the Northwest schools as "independents" for the 1902-1914 period is totally wrong. I'm actually peeling away the history now, work in progress at Northwest Intercollegiate Athletic Association, which started at WP a few years ago under a slightly different title. Gimme a few more hours to finish working on that. For quick evidence that there was such a conference, see THIS, for example. It's actually pretty interesting, arguably two different conferences, one that started in 1902 and died c. 1906 and another launched in early 1908. Anyway, hike! —Tim /// Carrite (talk) 02:13, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Good find, then. I look forward to viewing when complete with cites. It also implies a slew of downstream changes, including:
I'd focus on your current scope, but happy to pitch on the related when ready. UW Dawgs (talk) 02:22, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "Carrite".