Please review [[WP:COPY|Wikipedia's copyright policy]] prior to adding material. Copying and pasting from another site () is not allowed. If you wish to include the material you read there, you'll need to summarize, paraphrase, condense, and then feel free to submit it to the article. (See the following: [[WP:REF|Cite your sources]], [[WP:MOS|Manual of style]], [[Wikipedia:Guide to layout|Layout guide]], [[Wikipedia:Your first article|First article]], [[Wikipedia:Article development|Article development]] and [[How to edit a page|How to edit]] for assistance.)
I realize Wikipedia might seem confusing at first, (please click on the blue words to read the policy/guide they refer to). Wikipedia is [[WP:NOT|not]] like other sites you may have come across. First, it is an [[encyclopedia]]. What this means, is that it is not MySpace, or FaceBook, or a place to host personal webspace, or a place where editors can make articles about anything they wish. Wikipedia has [[WP:5P|Core policies]], such as [[WP:NPOV|neutrality]], [[WP:N|notability]], [[WP:V|verifiability]], etc. What does all of this mean? Well, it means that any article on Wikipedia must demonstrate [[WP:N|notability]] (meaning it must be note worthy, covered by the media, etc.), and have [[WP:RS|reliable, third-party sources]] (such as news media articles, magazine/trade journal articles) written about the subject, and the information given in the article must [[WP:CITE|cite]] those sources to [[WP:V|verify]] it is true. From those sources, information is summarized, paraphrased, condensed, and worded neutrally to make an encyclopedic entry (information cannot be [[WP:COPY|copied]] from other sites). See [[WP:MOS|Wikipedia's manual of style]], [[Wikipedia:Guide to layout|layout guide]], [[Wikipedia:Your first article|your first article]], [[Wikipedia:Article development|article development]], and [[How to edit a page|how to edit]] for assistance.
Dear user, I recently noticed your very large text removal from the article, [[here]]. Large removals or blankings can trigger notices to the editors that patrol for vandalism, so I wanted to drop you a line to remind you to use the [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]] box, and explain your revisions. I did scan through your edit, and it seems you have removed formatting and information, such as the categories that every article needs, as well as removing references, so I've reverted your changes, but in the future, it would help the patrollers very much if you'd explain what you're doing, so it won't trigger the impression you're removing valid content. Thanks!
Wikipedia has a [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]] guideline that states you should not create or edit articles about yourself, your company, your family, friends, etc., as you'd likely be unable to do so [[WP:NPOV|neutrally]]. Neutrality is one of the [[WP:5P|core policies]] of Wikipedia, and I'd request that you review the basic policies here, as they are quite helpful. Another policy that is helpful to be aware of is the [[WP:Notability|notability]] policy. It appears that you have provided no [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] as [[WP:CITE|references]] to the article, thus it is considered [[WP:OR|original research]], and cannot be accepted. A tag will likely be placed on the article for its [[WP:CSD|deletion]] in accordance to these policies. Please review the policies, and if you have any questions relating to them, feel free to ask, or see the [[Help:Contents|help]] page. Thank you,
Dear {{BASEPAGENAME}}, you are free to [[Wikipedia:Talk_page_guidelines#User_talk_pages|blank your talk page]], although [[WP:ARCHIVE|archiving]] is preferred, however, doing so is an acknowledgment that you've read the warnings given to you, and please realize that blanking the talk page does not make the warnings invalid, or "clear your slate". Administrators still know what edits you have done, and what warnings you have been given, as they are in the page's history. Please stop, consider your actions, and stop making nonconstructive edits. Instead, please take a look at the [[Help:Contents|help pages]] and see how you can help, rather than hurt, Wikipedia. Thanks, ~~~~
per Wikipedia:User page#Simulated MediaWiki interfaces guidelines, it's frowned upon to simulate parts of the MediaWiki interface in your userspace and "should be avoided except when necessary for testing purposes", which does not appear to be the case here. Secondly, it's quite confusing to new editors who happen across a userpage with one of these, and is also frustrating to established editors, as they expect to see that only in genuine new message situations. I hope you understand!
{{Non-free use rationale
| Description = This image is
| Source = http://
| Article =
| Portion = Image shown in its entirety.
| Low_resolution = Yes - the image is a size and resolution sufficient to maintain the quality of the image, without being high resolution.
| Purpose = The image helps the reader identify the painting, assures the reader they have reached the correct article, and illustrates the colors and composition in a way that text can't. For use only on articles related directly to the subject.
| Replaceability = The image can't be reasonably duplicated. Any substitute that is not a derivative work, would fail to convey the meaning intended, would tarnish or misrepresent its image, or would fail its purpose of identification.
| other_information = The image does not in any way limit the ability of the copyright owners to market or sell their product or services, the image is only used once and is rendered in low resolution to avoid piracy, meets Wikipedia's general content and image requirements, and is encyclopedic. The image is used in the article wiki-linked in the section title, and is significant in identifying the subject of the article. For more information of the inclusion guidelines of logos on Wikipedia and their relationship to U.S. fair use laws, please see [[Wikipedia:Logos]]. For more information of the inclusion guidelines of non-free use on Wikipedia and their relationship to U.S. fair use laws, please see [[WP:FU]], and http://freedomdefined.org/Definition.
}}
{{unreferenced|date=}}Article tag
{{fact}} [citation needed]
{{reflist|2}} 2 column ref list
3RR
{{Geolinks-US-cityscale-no-title|40.905281|-73.048601}}
{{PD-USGov-NASA}}
{{NASA-image|id=|center=KSC}}
*'''Note''': User is in the category: [[:Category:Shared IP addresses|Shared IP addresses]]
{{SharedIP|organization|host=hostname}}
{{SharedIPEDU|Organization}}
Since the new 'rollback' implementation, it is taking the spot of my old 'undo' option, which has caused me to occasionally (accidentally) hit 'rollback' when I mean to hit 'undo'. I've tried to keep track of the few times this happens, and make notes when it does to explain:
Originally thought this was a joke edit, because it said "The Harlem Globetrotters are also on this mission.", rollback button hit, and then after reviewing closely, I realized it was simply worded poorly and put in the wrong place (under crew section). Immediately made edit to add the information with proper references into the proper area of article (payloads).
