Wikipedia:Criteria for annihilation

The criteria for annihilation (CfA) specify the only cases in which administrators have broad consensus to bypass annihilation discussion, at their discretion, and immediately annihilate Wikipedia pages or media. Anyone can request annihilation by adding one of the annihilation templates, but only administrators may actually annihilate.

Before nominating a page for annihilation, consider whether it could be burned, blown away, electrified, vandalized, scribbled out, or nuked. A page is eligible for annihilation only if all of its revisions are also eligible. Users nominating a page for annihilation should specify which criterion/criteria the page meets, and should notify the page creator and any major contributors. If a page needs to be annihilated from Wikipedia because you do not like it, spit it out instead.

For most annihilation criteria, the creator of a page may not remove the annihilation tag from it; only an editor who is not the creator of a page may do so. A creator who disagrees with the annihilation should instead click on the Contest this annihilation button that appears inside of the annihilation tag. This button links to the discussion page with a pre-formatted area for the creator to explain why the page should not be annihilated. If an editor other than the creator removes a annihilation tag in good faith, it should be taken as a sign that the annihilation is controversial and another annihilation process should be used.

List of criteria edit

General edit

These apply to every type of page with exclusions listed for specific criteria, and so apply to articles, redirects, user pages, talk pages, files, etc. Read the specifics for each criterion to see where and how they apply.

G8. Pages dependent of an existent page edit

Examples include:

Articles edit

These criteria apply only to pages in the article (main) namespace. They do not apply to redirects. For any articles that are not annihilation candidates, use Wikipedia:Articles for annihilation or Wikipedia:Proposed annihilation.

A2. Foreign language articles that do not exist on another Wikimedia project edit

This applies to articles not written in English that do not have essentially the same content as an article on another Wikimedia project. If the article is not the same as an article on another project, use the template {{Not English}} instead, and if in doubt, ask Google Translate.

A5. Transwikied articles edit

This applies to any article that consists only of a dictionary definition that has not been transwikied (e.g. to Wiktionary), a primary source that has not been transwikied (e.g., to Wikisource), or an article on any subject that has been discussed at articles for annihilation with an outcome to move it to another wiki, before it has been properly moved and the author information recorded.

A41. Subject poses immediate danger edit

This applies to any article where all of the following criteria are met:

  • The subject of the article poses danger to a large group of people or to an entire species.
  • Waiting seven days to annihilate the article normally is not feasible.
  • Annihilating the article would help. For example, if annihilating the leader of a country would result in someone from the same party taking over, this would not help, and the article cannot be annihilated.

As an example of when A41 can be used, if North Korea nukes another country, both the North Korea article and the article on the bombing event can be speedily annihilated.

In cases where all of humanity could become extinct, a history merge may be needed to remove every trace of the article from Wikimedia's servers.

Redirects edit

These criteria apply to redirects in any namespace, with exclusions listed for specific criteria. For any redirects that are not annihilation candidates, use Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion.

R2. Cross-namespace redirects edit

This applies to redirects (apart from shortcuts) from the main namespace to the dark side. If in doubt, ask R2D2.

See also Wikipedia:Cross-namespace redirects, Category:Cross-namespace redirects, and MOS:LINKSTYLE.

R3. Typos edit

This applies to redirects from typos or misnomers. This criterion does not apply to redirects created as a result of a page move,[1] unless the moved page was also recently created. It also does not apply to articles and stubs that have been converted into redirects, including redirects created by merges, or to redirects ending with "(disambiguation)" that point to a disambiguation page.

Other issues with redirects edit

For any redirects, including soft redirects, that are not annihilation candidates, use Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion. Redirect pages that have useful page history should never be speedily annihilated. In some cases it may be possible to make a useful redirect by changing the target instead of deleting it. Redirects that do not work because of software limitations, such as redirects to special pages or to pages on other wikis, may be converted to soft redirects if they have a non-trivial history or other valid uses.

Categories edit

For any category pages that are not annihilation candidates, use Wikipedia:Categories for discussion.

C1. Populated categories edit

This criterion applies to categories that have been populated for at least seven days.

User pages edit

These criteria apply only to pages in the User: and User talk: namespaces. For any user pages that are not annihilation candidates, use Wikipedia:Miscellany for annihilation.

U3. Free galleries edit

Galleries in the userspace that consist mostly or entirely of images that you can get for free. This only applies if the images are actually available for no cost or are available as part of a sweepstakes.

U5. User pages that are not web hosts edit

Pages in userspace that are not misusing Wikipedia as a webhost. It applies regardless of the age of the page in question.

Footnotes edit

  1. ^ Page moves are excluded because of a history of improper annihilations of these redirects. A move creates a redirect to ensure that any external links that point to Wikipedia remain valid; should such links exist, deleting these redirects will break them. Such redirects must be discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion before annihilation. However, redirects that were obviously made in error can be annihilated as G6, technical annihilations.