"Hidden Heroes" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Hidden Heroes. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 13#Hidden Heroes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Firefangledfeathers (talk) 04:19, 13 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Problems with upload of File:Kevin baugh molossia.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading File:Kevin baugh molossia.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:05, 6 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Public holidays in the Republic of Molossia edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Public holidays in the Republic of Molossia, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bgwhite (talk) 06:52, 9 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Home Is Where I Hang My Towel edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Home Is Where I Hang My Towel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Agtx (talk) 18:25, 10 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Jeralean Talley.jpg edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on File:Jeralean Talley.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. (ESkog)(Talk) 19:16, 14 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Image tagging for File:Atari's Greatest Hits Volume 2.jpeg edit

Thanks for uploading File:Atari's Greatest Hits Volume 2.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:05, 9 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Lip glow.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lip glow.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:29, 17 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Denis Akiyama.jpg edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Denis Akiyama.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:30, 17 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for February 7 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nintendo GameCube Broadband Adapter and Modem Adapter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Developer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 7 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Free McBoot edit

Hello, Childishbeat. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Free McBoot, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

  1. edit the page
  2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. —swpbT 17:55, 9 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for May 11 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Free McBoot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Homebrew. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 11 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Toy Story 2: Operation Rescue Woody edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Toy Story 2: Operation Rescue Woody requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ethanlu121 (talk) 12:47, 31 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

July 2016 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Toy Story 2: Operation Rescue Woody, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Please do not introduce blank pages to the mainspace. Please write drafts in your Userspace, and then introduce them to the mainspace. If you introduce a draft to the mainspace, it may be deleted if it meets the criteria for deletion. Ethanlu121 (talk) 12:51, 31 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of V.Smile Art Studio edit

Hello Childishbeat,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged V.Smile Art Studio for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 13:17, 31 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Blank articles edit

The main article space is supposed to be for complete articles which meet Wikipedia standards, not a staging area for article construction. For this, please use either the Draft space (for example, Draft:V.Smile Art Studio) or your own user space (for example, User:Childishbeat/V.Smile Art Studio). In both places you will have plenty of time to create your articles without the intervention of other editors. ubiquity (talk) 13:23, 31 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for August 1 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited V.Smile, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Up. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 1 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Wacky Race on Jumpin' Bean Island edit

 

The article Wacky Race on Jumpin' Bean Island has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication of WP:notability. Unsourced.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 17:07, 1 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Childishbeat. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Norwich Gaming Festival edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Norwich Gaming Festival requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Quasar G t - c 18:47, 6 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Childishbeat. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Making the Grade (video game) edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Making the Grade (video game), a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Warm Regards, ZI Jony (talk) 19:40, 3 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

@ZI Jony: I'd be interested to hear your explanation of how this article meets CSD G3 (I've deleted it per WP:CSD#G12 as it seems to have been copied and pasted directly from the mobygames entry). Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:45, 3 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

File:Making the Grade.jpg edit

 

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:03, 4 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Making the Grade.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Making the Grade.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Bertaut (talk) 00:58, 5 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Childishbeat. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Mixed media (band) moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Mixed media (band), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 19:55, 24 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages! edit

 
Hello, Childishbeat. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 23:03, 24 November 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

Proposed deletion of notable. In particular, there is no sourced information to show how they meet WP:NMUSIC.]] edit

 

The article notable. In particular, there is no sourced information to show how they meet WP:NMUSIC.]] has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article lacks sources, and has no evidence that this band is [{WP:N

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 23:05, 24 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Mixed Media (band) for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mixed Media (band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mixed Media (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 15:08, 26 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived edit

 

Hi Childishbeat! You created a thread called How can I port this record charts infobox from German-language Wikipedia to English-language Wikipedia? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 27 November 2019 (UTC)Reply


Teahouse talkback: you've got messages! edit

 
Hello, Childishbeat. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by ~~ OxonAlex - talk 11:00, 11 December 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply

Your thread has been archived edit

 

Hi Childishbeat! You created a thread called This image works on English Wikipedia, but not Simple English Wikipedia. at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 14 December 2019 (UTC)Reply


January 2020 edit

  Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Wikipedia:Teahouse, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. David Biddulph (talk) 08:30, 3 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

I admit sometimes, I accidentally forget to do things on Wikipedia. But I still always try to make things right on Wikipedia. And yes, this comment is marked as a minor edit. Childishbeat (talk) 08:34, 3 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived edit

 

Hi Childishbeat! You created a thread called I'm trying to link the Tok Pisin Wikipedia version of ישראל. to English Wikipedia, which is of the same name, but I can't do so, instead getting an error message saying .il already exists on English Wikipedia. at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 6 January 2020 (UTC)Reply


Your thread has been archived edit

 

Hi Childishbeat! You created a thread called How should I say the price of one version of a product will cost something between two values in a Wikipedia article? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 28 January 2020 (UTC)Reply


Mophun moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Mophun, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster talk 18:14, 19 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Mixed media (band) concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Mixed media (band), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 25 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mophun (May 9) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SpicyMilkBoy was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 15:38, 9 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Childishbeat! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SpicyMilkBoy (talk) 15:38, 9 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Revue artist moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Revue artist, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. buidhe 13:06, 12 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Mixed media (band) edit

 

Hello, Childishbeat. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mixed media".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 13:57, 25 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of HQ9+ for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article HQ9+ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HQ9+ (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pichpich (talk) 18:20, 26 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived edit

 

Hi Childishbeat! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Does BlueMaxima's Flashpoint pass Wikipedia's notability requirements?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 1 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

June 2020 edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Roblox, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. This also applies to your edit to Biola University. Please stop adding content with no or unreliable sources. -- ferret (talk) 02:03, 23 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Liam Dutton" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Liam Dutton. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 23#Liam Dutton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 02:20, 23 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

"The village with the long name" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect The village with the long name. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 23#The village with the long name until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon • videos) 02:24, 23 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

The Castle Tour moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, The Castle Tour, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 12:04, 8 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived edit

 

Hi Childishbeat! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Request to turn the Wikipedia page named "Pootis" into a redirect page, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 19 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Shocketing" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Shocketing. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 30#Shocketing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 17:35, 30 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Revue artist edit

 

Hello, Childishbeat. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Revue artist".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:56, 21 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Capo Plaza edit

 Template:Capo Plaza has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 19:42, 2 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Mophun edit

 

Hello, Childishbeat. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mophun".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:38, 4 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Please stop making pointless redirects to every month of every year edit

Please stop making pointless redirects to every month in every year. These just clog up legitimate search results, and simply make it harder for people to find stuff.

Anyone wanting to find something that happened in July of 1861 doesn't need much brainpower to scroll down to that month on that page. They certainly don't need a pointless redirect from you to July 1861 to find it. What on earth is your rationale for doing this? And please don't make any more until you explain your reasoning. Nick Moyes (talk) 14:50, 5 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

I started doing them because some Month Year links on Wikipedia:Date formattings/Month Year were nonexistent. Childishbeat (talk) 15:56, 5 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of Mophun games for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Mophun games, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Mophun games until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 6 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

More pointless redirects - you really need to stop this! edit

You are still making utterly pointless and trivial redirects for absolutely good reason. You really need to stop this and do something worthwhile on Wikipedia. Reasonable and expected typographical errors for major topics might be ok, but here are some of the ridiculous redirects you've made recenty. Do not make any more like this - they're pointless and this is becoming disruptive.

If you don't understand why I'm saying this, just stop editing and ask. Nick Moyes (talk) 23:22, 8 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived edit

 

Hi Childishbeat! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Delete misspelled November 1866 redirect (Novembe 1866), has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 9 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Byond" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Byond. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 13#Byond until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 18:08, 13 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

"Video Beyond" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Video Beyond. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 13#Video Beyond until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 18:09, 13 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

You really need to stop making pointless WP:REDIRECTS, now! edit

It's not getting through to you is it? (See here and here, lest you've forgotten).

You are still continuing with seemingly pointless and unwarranted creations of utterly trivial WP:REDIRECTS - in the latest instance, for non-notable animators and production staff listed (but not cited) in fancruft-filled articles like Meta Runner, together with different spellings of some of these folks' names. It is obsessive to the point of being disruptive, in my view, and some of it is going to take some clearing up.

Example: David JG Doyle and David J.G. Doyle - both apparently minor voice actors in that animation series, but no citations in the article even to verify that fact. Just look at them all!

I was minded to administer a short editing block on your account for ignoring my earlier requests and to stop you making any more of these unnecessary petty redirects. However, I'm first going to take advice from my colleagues, lest I'm over-reacting, and am happy to be told by a fellow admin that I'm fussing over nothing. Personally, I feel you are just bloating this encyclopaedia with unwanted and unnecessary redirects to non-notable people of no encyclopaedic value whatsoever, and which anyone with an ounce of common sense would have been able to find more effectively just by searching for their names using our search box - and probably finding more mentions of them hidden away in one or two articles. Are you planning to go through every Wikipedia article and link to every name of every person ever linked in each one, no matter how trivial they are? No, this has to end. In the meantime, just stop with the petty redirect creation please. Treat this as a final warning, but I want to assume good faith, and to ensure that I am right in giving you this warning, so I will not act if you do still create one or two more of them unless some of my colleagues first agree with my concerns over what I regard as your ridiculous editing behaviour. So, I'm pinging both Hoary and Rosguill who I note have both edited at Meta Runner recently and hope that they can chip in with some advice and guidance here - both to you, and, indeed, to me. Regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 22:30, 13 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nick Moyes, thanks for the ping. I agree that the redirect creations are excessive and mostly pointless. I didn't raise the issue myself because it seemed like it would be more trouble to complain about than to just ignore, and the majority of the redirects, while not beneficial, seemed harmless. signed, Rosguill talk 22:50, 13 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
Childishbeat, Nudrat Afza is an article that I created. If I had good reason to think that people would get her name backwards, I'd provide a redirect from "Afza Nudrat". But I don't have any reason to think that they would, so I don't provide it. Let's suppose somebody did think that her name was "Afza Nudrat". Type that into the search box: what do you get? Now suppose that somebody knew it was "Nudrat Afza" but omitted to capitalize the "A". Type "Nudrat afza" into the search box: what do you get? I could have made redirects but I didn't. Most imaginable redirects are worthless, and redirects aren't dirt cheap. And yes, among the worthless kinds of redirect are those from the names of people who don't merit their own articles to articles that say very little about those people that's verifiable. -- Hoary (talk) 23:37, 13 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

I was trying to go easier on creating redirects with how I was doing it, and I thought I was. Just saying.Childishbeat (talk) 09:03, 14 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Do you have any sort of conflict of interest with Vyond? Because at this point I think I've gone through over 100 redirects pointing to that page. signed, Rosguill talk 18:04, 16 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

New Years Resolution: let's work together to delete these redirects edit

Hi there. I hope you had a pleasant seasonal break from Wikipedia? I'd like to suggest a way for you and me to work to clean up and resolve the problem with the myriads of unwanted redirects you created since October 2020. It seems unfair to expect a host of other editors have a protracted redirect discussion for each on of them, so I'd like you to work through them all for us, and to place a 'speedy deletion' request on them all. (You can keep those tiny handful where an alternative name word is included in the lead paragraph, but I only want to see ONE version with the correct spelling, not multiple alternatives.) Any redirect to a minor animator or cameraman in one film will, as I explained above, prevent another user from finding all the articles where that name appears. I know you felt you were doing it for the right reasons, but I hope you've come to appreciate that the 'help' is actually more of a hindrance in most cases.

To flag a page you've created for 'Speedy Deletion' do that by adding this code to the top of each page: {{Db-u1}}. It will place a 'user request' for deletion on each one, and you can ping me and I or another admin will go through and remove them for you. To start you off, here are 82 redirects you made to Vyond. I would expect no more than three or four would merit retention, but you are welcome to justify which ones you want to keep if you aren't sure if it's OK.

Then I would like you to go through and flag for deletion all the month and year redirects you made. As I explained, these just bulk out genuine worthy redirects and render searching for such pages much more awkward.

Here is a full list of all your page creations for you to work through.

I look forward to hearing from you. Happy New Year, Nick Moyes (talk) 12:43, 31 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

It's pretty neat if I add the speedy deletion template to a page, it goes off the list of redirects, which make the job easier, as I don't have to remember which ones I've already done this with and go through them. Childishbeat (talk) 16:53, 31 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

OK, thanks for appreciating this is a good way forward. I saw you tried to test it out by placing the template on a few redirects, and that Onel5969 reverted them. I must apologise to you if I wasn't clear enough above, but what I'm asking you to do is only to put up for deletion the Redirects that you, personally, created. It's true, that other redirects should go through a WP:RFD discussion, but that you - as the creator - can place the {{Db-u1}} template on the ones you made. I, or another admin, can then delete them for you. If you preview the page before publishing changes and see a big red warning line saying you weren't the creator, then please don't go ahead and publish that. I certainly wasn't saying that all redirects to Vyond should be deleted, but the ones to minor individuals or alternative spellings that you made are the types I'd like to work with you on removing. I also accept that there may be some merit in a small handful of the redirects you've made, but I think the majority are not necessary. Ping me if you have problems, by all means. Nick Moyes (talk) 19:41, 31 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

I knew. I thought of which redirects to remove, and only chose my own, mostly ones with alternate lowercase capitalizations for Vyond, and the Draft: pages for Meta Runner. I didn't delete the ones for minor indivduals, as I didn't want to do that. Childishbeat (talk) 22:29, 31 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

No worries. We'll get there. Maybe your plan for 2021 could be to find articles to make more substantive improvements on. Take care. Nick Moyes (talk) 00:58, 1 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

"Reward day" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Reward day. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 16#Reward day until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 18:00, 16 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:The Castle Tour edit

 

Hello, Childishbeat. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Castle Tour".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:50, 8 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

"Elsie Lovelock" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Elsie Lovelock. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 10#Elsie Lovelock until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jalen Folf (talk) 03:32, 10 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

In Motza moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, In Motza, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Ashleyyoursmile! 17:44, 26 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:אדם - אין מוצא.mp3 edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:אדם - אין מוצא.mp3. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:48, 27 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

"Dead meme" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Dead meme. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 4#Dead meme until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 17:21, 4 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Non cambierò mai (Capo Plaza song) edit

  Hello, Childishbeat. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Non cambierò mai (Capo Plaza song), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:03, 12 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Giovane Fuoriclasse edit

  Hello, Childishbeat. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Giovane Fuoriclasse, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:03, 12 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Giovane Fuoriclasse edit

 

Hello, Childishbeat. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Giovane Fuoriclasse".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:08, 10 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Non cambierò mai (Capo Plaza song) edit

 

Hello, Childishbeat. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Non cambierò mai".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:08, 10 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Electric Beat Crew moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Electric Beat Crew, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 21:54, 5 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:In Motza edit

  Hello, Childishbeat. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:In Motza, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 5 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:In Motza edit

 

Hello, Childishbeat. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "In Motza".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:06, 5 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Electric Beat Crew edit

  Hello, Childishbeat. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Electric Beat Crew, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Electric Beat Crew edit

 

Hello, Childishbeat. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Electric Beat Crew".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:57, 5 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Finnigan Fox logo.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Finnigan Fox logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 17 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Jason Marnocha" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Jason Marnocha and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 21#Jason Marnocha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 22:43, 21 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Anthony Sardinha" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Anthony Sardinha and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 21#Anthony Sardinha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 22:44, 21 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Punishment day video" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Punishment day video and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 12#Punishment day video until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 18:40, 12 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Punishment day videos" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Punishment day videos and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 19#Punishment day videos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 15:06, 19 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Punishment days" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Punishment days and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 19#Punishment days until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 15:06, 19 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Ungrounded videos" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Ungrounded videos and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 19#Ungrounded videos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 15:06, 19 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Ungrounded video" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Ungrounded video and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 19#Ungrounded video until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 15:06, 19 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Grounding videos" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Grounding videos and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 19#Grounding videos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 15:06, 19 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Grounding video" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Grounding video and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 19#Grounding video until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 15:06, 19 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Vlak (video game) edit

 

The article Vlak (video game) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable freeware game. No other sources online, and Czech WP does not have additional information/sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alyo (chat·edits) 14:33, 18 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Baby Sisters moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Baby Sisters, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 14:37, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Bot-Boy" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  The redirect Bot-Boy has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 26 § Bot-Boy until a consensus is reached. Jeffhardyfan08 (talk) 21:33, 26 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Bot-Boys" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  The redirect Bot-Boys has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 26 § Bot-Boys until a consensus is reached. Jeffhardyfan08 (talk) 21:33, 26 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Only Up" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  The redirect Only Up has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 26 § Only Up until a consensus is reached. Jeffhardyfan08 (talk) 21:35, 26 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Baby Sisters edit

  Hello, Childishbeat. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Baby Sisters, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Cut-and-paste moves edit

  Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give List of Imagine video games a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you.

I've already handled this case for you, so there's nothing else you need to do, but to note for the future. * Pppery * it has begun... 00:35, 28 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply