| 4 | Normal | |
| 2.73 RPM according to EnterpriseyBot 21:10, 23 June 2024 (UTC) | edit | |
Reports
edit- 2402:8100:29b0:7653:5d9c:a889:a679:3cb (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:30, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hashid Khan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 809 twice in the last 5 minutes (Possible SPI/Project space disruption, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:47, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- 202.45.119.19 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 30 five times in the last 5 minutes (Large deletion from article by new editors, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:40, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- 2601:204:4001:54f4:95cb:553f:d106:418a (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 05:10, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
User-reported
edit- 2600:1700:1CA0:6800:D4F3:2DD9:7EBB:E861 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – account is evidently a spambot or a compromised account. -- Alex_21 TALK 03:15, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Note: 2600:1700:1CA0:6800:0:0:0:0/64 is currently partial blocked. HBC AIV helperbot5 (talk) 04:53, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- While an actual warning would have been nice, it looks like the underlying /64 has a regular habit of making exclusively these types of edits over months, albeit infrequently enough and under different ips that they might not even get warnings reliably anyway. For now I blocked the range in Talk for 72 hours to see if it helps any; it could probably go for more. --slakr\ talk / 04:58, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- වාවාරරු (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. LTA. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 03:25, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- 85.110.47.188 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – On Tohru Honda (diff): Block evasion of WP:LTA/AG1204. — AP 499D25 (talk) 03:27, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- 60.242.11.38 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – See edit filter log. Codename Noreste 🤔 Talk 04:58, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- 2601:204:4001:54F4:95CB:553F:D106:418A (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – vandalism after final warning. see filter log. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 05:11, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Figgy69piggy (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) – actions evidently indicate a vandalism-only account. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 05:12, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
No vandalism since final warning. Re-report if this user resumes vandalising. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:33, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- 2001:448A:2040:FE28:93E:C92B:CCE4:C56A (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Persistent disruptive editing and adding any fake, unsourced and unverifiable information across Wikipedia. 2001:448A:1020:40B0:5C71:6F2C:2816:F6E2 (talk) 05:19, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- 2001:448A:2040:FE28:0:0:0:0/64 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · block user · block log) – Persistent disruptive editing and adding any fake, unsourced and unverifiable information across Wikipedia. 2001:448A:1020:40B0:5C71:6F2C:2816:F6E2 (talk) 05:28, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- June 16 (Sunday) (0 open / 46 closed / 46 total discussions)
- June 15 (Saturday) (0 open / 53 closed / 53 total discussions)
Usernames for administrator attention
- SPAMMANER (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
This username matched "spam" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 14:30, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
- DaKidOfficial (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- IdioticCake (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "idiot" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 02:50, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Pizzermeep (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
Low confidence There is low confidence in this filter test, please be careful in blocking. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:10, 23 June 2024 (UTC)- This username matched "Used z instead of s attempting to skip filter: piss. Violating string: pissermeep" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 03:10, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Username3472 (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- Stupiddevin (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "stupid" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 16:00, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- WeHateDumfriesshire (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- MarylandSucks (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "sucks" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 18:30, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oshatheturd (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
- This username matched "turd" on the blacklist. -- DQB (owner / report) 02:40, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- SKIBIDI TAX PRODUCTIONS (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal)
User-reported
edit- Shidded myself (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. Staraction (talk | contribs) 18:42, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Wait until the user edits. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 20:41, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Shahbazllc (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Added a spammy link (Special:Diff/1230568289). jlwoodwa (talk) 20:42, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Butth0le (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. The user name has a 0 in place of an o so the name looks like “Butthole”, which is a reference to the anus. Lenredo (talk) 00:01, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Skibiditoiletloverfanumtaxkaicenatgyattlivvydunerizzbabygronk (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a disruptive username. Ae245 (talk) 03:06, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- Wmdhealthcare (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Ae245 (talk) 05:41, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Requests for page protection
Current requests for increase in protection level
editRequest protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Referee of a recent football (soccer) match attracting some vandalism from fans. Giraffer (talk) 22:11, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – The page, by its very nature, is a magnet for vandalism and other disruptive edits, as the history shows. Previous protections have been short-lived and the problem returns each time. Crossroads -talk- 22:24, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected indefinitely. Elli (talk | contribs) 01:37, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. FMSky (talk) 22:42, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: repetitive vandalism Http iosue (talk) 00:01, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Ongoing disruptive edit (adding the same incorrect info over and over) by a user with a changing IP address. Has been reverted many times by multiple editors. Bahooka (talk) 01:19, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked. I've blocked the range all the disruptive edits have originated from for a month. Elli (talk | contribs) 01:45, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Temporary pending changes protection: Persistent vandalism. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 01:35, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Temporary move protection: Page title dispute/move warring. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 02:31, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 04:18, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Continuous additions of the same unsourced information despite prior warnings to the IPs adding the information. One IP has previous block. CNMall41 (talk) 04:49, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for reduction in protection level
editRequest unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.
Reason: The protection is not needed as the disruptive edits by unnecessarily reverting are done by an extended confirmed user. The disruptive edits(reverting) are [1] [2] [3]. These constant and complete revertings of contributions done by multiple users prevents the improvements done to the page. That particular user is alerted in the talk page of the article and hasn't yet provided evidence to his claims. Not blanket page protection but page protection from this particular user is the one needed. അദ്വൈതൻ (talk) 16:35, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- That's not an argument for unprotection, given the BLP issues FrancisSobieski123 (talk · contribs) introduced right before the ECP. If anything, that's an argument to escalate it to full-protection until a discussion has actually run its course. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 16:39, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Reverting contributions of multiple users citing an unreliability of a citation added by one user is injustice. Already the article lacks Neutral point of View(under the section Pastoral ministry and sub section love and narcotics jihad controversy ) that too on a living person, the reverting has undid my multiple contributions too, all with reliable sources that was to address this issue. That particular user's blanket reverting has done no improvement to the page. And that user who reverted my contributions hasn't yet provided evidence to his claim in the article's talk page when asked അദ്വൈതൻ (talk) 17:13, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- You're still making a case for escalating the protection, not downgrading it. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 17:29, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Reverting contributions of multiple users citing an unreliability of a citation added by one user is injustice. Already the article lacks Neutral point of View(under the section Pastoral ministry and sub section love and narcotics jihad controversy ) that too on a living person, the reverting has undid my multiple contributions too, all with reliable sources that was to address this issue. That particular user's blanket reverting has done no improvement to the page. And that user who reverted my contributions hasn't yet provided evidence to his claim in the article's talk page when asked അദ്വൈതൻ (talk) 17:13, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Reason: No puedo acceder 38.49.141.10 (talk) 00:30, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
- @38.49.141.10. The page is not protected. Or are you referring to something else? -- Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:34, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Current requests for edits to a protected page
editRequest a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}},{{Edit template-protected}},{{Edit extended-protected}}, or{{Edit semi-protected}}to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Handled requests
editA historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
Protected edit requests
| 0 protected edit requests | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 04:43, 24 June 2024 (UTC) |
| 12 template-protected edit requests | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Updated as needed. Last updated: 05:23, 24 June 2024 (UTC) |
Requests for permission - rollback
WP:RFPERM (rollback)
Rollback
edit- TonyBallioni (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Can someone grant me rollback when they have the chance? Realized I forgot to ask for it after turning in the tools, and while I'm not around that much, when I am I prefer it to Twinkle. TonyBallioni (talk) 21:12, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Done Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 21:42, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
- Informationageuser (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
Hello. Requesting rollback rights to more swiftly correct vandalism and other clearly improper edits. I have dealt with a variety of these over time, with demonstrated knowledge of how to warn and/or welcome with specific guidance tailored to the problematic edit in each case. Thank you. Informationageuser (talk) 05:53, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has 152 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot talk 06:00, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Not done I noticed you make a handful of edits, and then drop off for months at a time. While I appreciate your enthusiasm, I'd like to see you spend at least a month consistently patrolling RecentChanges (Twinkle & Ultraviolet can help with that) before reapplying. Also, please ensure that you are always warning editors when you revert their edits. Thanks, Fastily 11:21, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Skitash (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
As someone who constantly reverts disruptive editors and reports vandals to WP:AIV almost daily, I would greatly appreciate access to rollback permissions to facilitate my work. Skitash (talk) 20:13, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits (e.g. 1, 2, 3). Why? It's important to leave a notification for every revert you make. Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 21:58, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- I apologize for not consistently warning editors when reverting their edits. This was primarily the case with IP hoppers, as warnings seemed redundant given that IPs keep changing. For instance, instead of warning this IP I believed to be a WP:LOUTSOCK of Derklnin (whom I had already warned), I opted to request protection for the page at WP:RPPI to secure the article against long-term IP vandalism instead. Moving forward, I will make sure to issue a warning for every IP and registered user I revert. Skitash (talk) 22:51, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Clearfrienda (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs (blocks · rights · moves) · rfar · spi · cci)
I had rollback on trial that expired about a year ago. My request to renew it was denied due to inactivity. I want to to request it again to gain access to WP:UV and WP:HUGGLE. Thanks. C F A 💬 21:36, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([4]). — MusikBot talk 21:40, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Not done When I declined your previous request, I asked you to spend a month actively patrolling RecentChanges. Upon reviewing your contributions, I found almost no reverts in the interim period. I see you made a handful of reverts today, however I'm specifically looking for experience acquired over time, not during a single day. Also, please ensure that you are consistently warning editors when you revert their edits. -Fastily 21:58, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Fastily: I have been patrolling RecentChanges for about a month, not only today. See my undo log. I assumed this would be enough. C F A 💬 22:17, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- Please re-read my previous decline, I asked you to patrol consistently and actively. You're reverting vandalism sporadically for a day and then dropping off for weeks at a time. -Fastily 22:48, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Fastily: I have been patrolling RecentChanges for about a month, not only today. See my undo log. I assumed this would be enough. C F A 💬 22:17, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Requests for permission - account creator
There are no outstanding requests for account creator.