User talk:Neelix/deletions/Archive 12

Archive 5 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12

Proposed deletion of Possets

 

The article Possets has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Guy (Help!) 15:55, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Scaly-breasted

 

The article Scaly-breasted has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Neelix dab page consisting solely of WP:PTMs. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red-knobbed.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Tavix (talk) 00:42, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Twofold

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Twofold, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 20:07, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

State-sanctioned listed at Redirects for discussion

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect State-sanctioned. Since you had some involvement with the State-sanctioned redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. –Ammarpad (talk) 07:26, 17 June 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Sandra Zober for deletion

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sandra Zober is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandra Zober until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:55, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

AYY listed at Redirects for discussion

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect AYY. Since you had some involvement with the AYY redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. feminist (talk) 07:17, 23 June 2018 (UTC)

Category:Canadian given names has been nominated for discussion

 

Category:Canadian given names, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 21:04, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Super Robot (disambiguation) for deletion

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Super Robot (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super Robot (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 22:42, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Literary particularism

 

The article Literary particularism has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is nothing more than a dictionary definition. Search engine produces only mirrors and content that is not related to this subject.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  05:05, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Explosive sensitiser listed at Redirects for discussion

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Explosive sensitiser. Since you had some involvement with the Explosive sensitiser redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Pkbwcgs (talk) 20:44, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Gottlieb.jpg

 

Thanks for uploading File:Gottlieb.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:35, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of DJX for deletion

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DJX is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJX until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♪♫Alucard 16♫♪ 06:08, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

The Strait listed at Redirects for discussion

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Strait. Since you had some involvement with the The Strait redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 03:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Salaciousness listed at Redirects for discussion

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Salaciousness. Since you had some involvement with the Salaciousness redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 02:45, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Martin Mull (footprints in cement).jpg listed for discussion

 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Martin Mull (footprints in cement).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (tc) 19:23, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Phraseology:Tian Gao Huang-di Yuan listed at Redirects for discussion

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Phraseology:Tian Gao Huang-di Yuan. Since you had some involvement with the Phraseology:Tian Gao Huang-di Yuan redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:14, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Rahab Ministries Thailand for deletion

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rahab Ministries Thailand is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rahab Ministries Thailand until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Drover's Wife (talk) 01:15, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Freshly

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Freshly, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Natureium (talk) 15:05, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Quetch.jpg

 

Thanks for uploading File:Quetch.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:38, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ptychopariida

 Template:Ptychopariida has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 00:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Molester's Train

 Template:Molester's Train has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. • Gene93k (talk) 06:03, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Mss

 Template:Mss has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —TheDJ (talkcontribs) 21:17, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bath ḳōl

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bath ḳōl requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Bath+%E1%B8%B3%C5%8Dl&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=0. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. scope_creepTalk 18:19, 5 April 2019 (UTC)

Shedog listed at Redirects for discussion

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Shedog. Since you had some involvement with the Shedog redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 01:21, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Softener for deletion

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Softener is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Softener until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:51, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

"Massitchusits" listed at Redirects for discussion

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Massitchusits. Since you had some involvement with the Massitchusits redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:37, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Whity

Hello Neelix,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Whity for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Hughesdarren (talk) 08:56, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

"List of characters in Red Dead Redemption" listed at Redirects for discussion

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of characters in Red Dead Redemption. Since you had some involvement with the List of characters in Red Dead Redemption redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Lordtobi () 08:56, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mizzle

Hello Neelix,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Mizzle for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Xx236 (talk) 08:11, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

"Mizzle" listed at Redirects for discussion

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mizzle. Since you had some involvement with the Mizzle redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Onel5969 TT me 12:24, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Sebastian Doggart

 Template:Sebastian Doggart has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. jps (talk) 01:15, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Brings

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Brings requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Hugsyrup 14:32, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Spaniardsbay.JPG

 

Thanks for uploading File:Spaniardsbay.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:53, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

"Bombastic Bag Man" listed at Redirects for discussion

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bombastic Bag Man. Since you had some involvement with the Bombastic Bag Man redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:29, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

"Pitewey" listed at Redirects for discussion

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pitewey. Since you had some involvement with the Pitewey redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:41, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

"Over chuch" listed at Redirects for discussion

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Over chuch. Since you had some involvement with the Over chuch redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Reyk YO! 08:28, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

"Over-church" listed at Redirects for discussion

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Over-church. Since you had some involvement with the Over-church redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:16, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

"National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Aart Awards" listed at Redirects for discussion

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Aart Awards. Since you had some involvement with the National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Aart Awards redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 08:37, 17 February 2020 (UTC)

"Smirch" listed at Redirects for discussion

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Smirch. Since you had some involvement with the Smirch redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Hog Farm (talk) 17:46, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

"Insulated glazes" listed at Redirects for discussion

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Insulated glazes. Since you had some involvement with the Insulated glazes redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 15:03, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

"Triple-glazing" listed at Redirects for discussion

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Triple-glazing. Since you had some involvement with the Triple-glazing redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 15:08, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

"Flat-nosed" listed at Redirects for discussion

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the redirect Flat-nosed. should be deleted, kept, or retargeted. The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 22#Flat-nosed until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Plantdrew (talk) 00:21, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

"List of characters in the Halloween film series" listed at Redirects for discussion

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of characters in the Halloween film series. Since you had some involvement with the List of characters in the Halloween film series redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards, SONIC678 06:25, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

"Scatologies" listed at Redirects for discussion

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Scatologies. Since you had some involvement with the Scatologies redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 19:14, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

"Coprologies" listed at Redirects for discussion

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Coprologies. Since you had some involvement with the Coprologies redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 19:14, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

"JudæoChristian" listed at Redirects for discussion

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect JudæoChristian. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 9#JudæoChristian until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 15:56, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

 

The article Darren Storsley has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Minimal info on this page and I merged it all with the Miss BC page

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Proposed deletion of Ron Wear

 

The article Ron Wear has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Found zero sources on him except the UGC modelmayhem and other UGC like his website, twitter, Facebook, which I understand are all considered generally unreliable. All links in his references section are broken and unarchived except for modelmayhem. Merged his info with Miss BC page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wiki2008time (talk) 18:15, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Ron Wear for deletion

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ron Wear is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ron Wear until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Wiki2008time (talk) 21:58, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Florid

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Florid, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — Yours, Berrely • TalkContribs 19:06, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:My Life as a Smashed Burrito with Extra Hot Sauce (book cover).jpg

 

Thanks for uploading File:My Life as a Smashed Burrito with Extra Hot Sauce (book cover).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

"Complex 39" listed at Redirects for discussion

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Complex 39. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 10#Complex 39 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 09:28, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

"Complex 41" listed at Redirects for discussion

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Complex 41. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 10#Complex 41 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 09:33, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

"Complex 40" listed at Redirects for discussion

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Complex 40. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 10#Complex 40 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 09:33, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of World Orphans for deletion

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article World Orphans is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Orphans until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 03:39, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

"The Enemy (Middle-earth)" listed at Redirects for discussion

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect The Enemy (Middle-earth). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 14#The Enemy (Middle-earth) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. GimliDotNet (talk) 20:54, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Burgeo, Newfoundland and Labrador (city seal).jpg

 

Thanks for uploading File:Burgeo, Newfoundland and Labrador (city seal).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Siding (disambiguation) for deletion

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Siding (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siding (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MB 19:48, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Schefflera

 Template:Schefflera has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hyperik talk 23:46, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

"Halloed" listed at Redirects for discussion

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Halloed. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 11#Halloed until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TheAwesomeHwyh 19:57, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

"Reverences" listed at Redirects for discussion

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Reverences. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 20#Reverences until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:46, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

"Dunderhead" listed at Redirects for discussion

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Dunderhead. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 28#Dunderhead until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 14:55, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Centre to End All Sexual Exploitation

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Centre to End All Sexual Exploitation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Centre to End All Sexual Exploitation. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Onel5969 TT me 13:47, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Avondaleseal.JPG

 

Thanks for uploading File:Avondaleseal.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gabardine (disambiguation)

 

The article Gabardine (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

disambig for only two topics; hatnote on gabardine suffices

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 08:11, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

"Alabaman rivers" listed at Redirects for discussion

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Alabaman rivers. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 29#Alabaman rivers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ob C. alias ALAROB 23:37, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

"Yìndù" listed at Redirects for discussion

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Yìndù. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 8#Yìndù until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumya-8974 (he) talk contribs subpages 08:38, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

"Expulsive" listed at Redirects for discussion

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Expulsive. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 12#Expulsive until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Hog Farm Bacon 07:11, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Indie Fest for deletion

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Indie Fest is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indie Fest until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (。◕‿◕。) 08:20, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Human trafficking in Bangladesh

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Human trafficking in Bangladesh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:16, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

"Liberally" listed at Redirects for discussion

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Liberally. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 16#Liberally until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:13, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jeff Deyo Surrender.jpg

 

Thanks for uploading File:Jeff Deyo Surrender.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:07, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

"Eductor-jet pump" listed at Redirects for discussion

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Eductor-jet pump. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 31#Eductor-jet pump until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion also includes Eductors, which you edited in the past. Cnilep (talk) 06:57, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

"Free Willie (Due South)" listed at Redirects for discussion

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Free Willie (Due South). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 31#Free Willie (Due South) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Dominicmgm (talk) 14:56, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

"Modern Painter" listed at Redirects for discussion

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Modern Painter. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 April 5#Modern Painter until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:53, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

"The Outcast (manga)" listed at Redirects for discussion

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect The Outcast (manga). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 2#The Outcast (manga) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Link20XX (talk) 23:10, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Samuel Booth

 

The article Samuel Booth has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability is WP:NOTINHERITED from his notable son.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:26, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mary Moss

 

The article Mary Moss has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability is WP:NOTINHERITED from her notable son.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:26, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

"Αἴαξ" listed at Redirects for discussion

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Αἴαξ. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 5#Αἴαξ until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
10:15, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Men Are Like Waffles — Women Are Like Spaghetti for deletion

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Men Are Like Waffles — Women Are Like Spaghetti is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Men Are Like Waffles — Women Are Like Spaghetti until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DGG ( talk ) 01:30, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Men Are Like Waffles — Women Are Like Spaghetti.jpg

 

Thanks for uploading File:Men Are Like Waffles — Women Are Like Spaghetti.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Saving Your Marriage Before It Starts.jpg

 

Thanks for uploading File:Saving Your Marriage Before It Starts.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 9 October 2021 (UTC)

"Carrot head" listed at Redirects for discussion

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Carrot head. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 21#Carrot head until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. —AFreshStart (talk) 14:32, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of AxiCorp

 

The article AxiCorp has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable sources, only sef-citating

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FossLimi (talk) 14:17, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

"Benign" listed at Redirects for discussion

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Benign and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 19#Benign until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 21:16, 19 January 2022 (UTC)

"Subcenter" listed at Redirects for discussion

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Subcenter and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 24#Subcenter until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 19:24, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

"Sub centres" listed at Redirects for discussion

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Sub centres and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 24#Sub centres until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 19:24, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

"Sub centers" listed at Redirects for discussion

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Sub centers and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 24#Sub centers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 19:24, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

"Sub-centre" listed at Redirects for discussion

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Sub-centre and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 24#Sub-centre until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 19:24, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

"Subcentres" listed at Redirects for discussion

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Subcentres and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 24#Subcentres until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 19:24, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

"Subcenters" listed at Redirects for discussion

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Subcenters and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 24#Subcenters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 19:24, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

"Sub centre" listed at Redirects for discussion

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Sub centre and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 24#Sub centre until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 19:24, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

"Sub center" listed at Redirects for discussion

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Sub center and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 24#Sub center until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 19:24, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

"Sub-centres" listed at Redirects for discussion

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Sub-centres and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 24#Sub-centres until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 19:24, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

"Sub-centers" listed at Redirects for discussion

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Sub-centers and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 24#Sub-centers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 19:24, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

"Sub-center" listed at Redirects for discussion

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Sub-center and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 24#Sub-center until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 19:24, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

"Subcentre" listed at Redirects for discussion

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Subcentre and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 24#Subcentre until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Veverve (talk) 19:24, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

"Anti-national" listed at Redirects for discussion

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Anti-national and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 28#Anti-national until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 20:25, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

"Turreter" listed at Redirects for discussion

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Turreter and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 2#Turreter until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Schierbecker (talk) 08:13, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

"Turreters" listed at Redirects for discussion

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Turreters and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 2#Turreters until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Schierbecker (talk) 08:16, 2 February 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Mind Meld flatulence.wav

 

The file File:Mind Meld flatulence.wav has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

File in .wav format not compliant with WP:NFCC#3b. Replaced by File:Mind Meld flatulence.mp3....

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mind Meld flatulence.wav

 

Thanks for uploading File:Mind Meld flatulence.wav. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:12, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Jerusalem Institute of Justice for deletion

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jerusalem Institute of Justice is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jerusalem Institute of Justice until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Unbh (talk) 08:46, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

"Gold to silver ratio" listed at Redirects for discussion

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Gold to silver ratio and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 14#Gold to silver ratio until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. NotReallySoroka (talk) 00:03, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:John Edward Brownlee

 Template:John Edward Brownlee has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:45, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

"Dab hand" listed at Redirects for discussion

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Dab hand and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 27#Dab hand until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 18:35, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Christian Women in Media Association for deletion

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christian Women in Media Association is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Women in Media Association until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:55, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

"Anticolonial" listed at Redirects for discussion

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Anticolonial and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 18#Anticolonial until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 02:03, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

"Anti-colonialisms" listed at Redirects for discussion

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Anti-colonialisms and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 18#Anti-colonialisms until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 02:03, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

"Anticolonialisms" listed at Redirects for discussion

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Anticolonialisms and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 June 18#Anticolonialisms until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she/they) 02:03, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

"Китай" listed at Redirects for discussion

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Китай and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 8#Китай until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TraderCharlotte (talk) 03:13, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Thurina

 

The article Thurina has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence either of these women were ever known by this name

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

"Λυκάνθρωπος" listed at Redirects for discussion

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Λυκάνθρωπος and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 16#Λυκάνθρωπος until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TNstingray (talk) 16:37, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

"Slender-spined" listed at Redirects for discussion

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Slender-spined and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 22#Slender-spined until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Plantdrew (talk) 16:36, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

"Mephitic" listed at Redirects for discussion

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Mephitic and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 30#Mephitic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. 1234qwer1234qwer4 14:06, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

"Thirtieth Street" listed at Redirects for discussion

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Thirtieth Street and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 11#Thirtieth Street until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Regards, SONIC678 04:42, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

"Mock Orange (mulberry)" listed at Redirects for discussion

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Mock Orange (mulberry) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 3#Mock Orange (mulberry) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Plantdrew (talk) 22:45, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Species description

 Template:Species description has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hemiauchenia (talk) 18:07, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Armenian unisex given names

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Armenian unisex given names indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:11, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

"Crystal Sea (Masters of the Universe)" listed at Redirects for discussion

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Crystal Sea (Masters of the Universe) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 29#Crystal Sea (Masters of the Universe) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Foreign Policy Council

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Foreign Policy Council requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
  • disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
  • is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:55, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

"Foreign Policy Council" listed at Redirects for discussion

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Foreign Policy Council and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 20 § Foreign Policy Council until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:20, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Global Minnesota

 

The article Global Minnesota has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unable to find evidence this meets N:ORG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Star Mississippi 01:23, 4 January 2023 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Douglass Dumbrille as J.D. Morgan in A Day at the Races (1937).jpg

 

Thanks for uploading File:Douglass Dumbrille as J.D. Morgan in A Day at the Races (1937).jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:02, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Commissioner James Gordon (Neil Hamilton).jpg

 

Thank you for uploading File:Commissioner James Gordon (Neil Hamilton).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Pennyworth.jpg

 

Thanks for uploading File:Pennyworth.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 21:38, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of AxiCorp for deletion

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AxiCorp is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AxiCorp until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

David Gerard (talk) 22:09, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Pard (disambiguation) for deletion

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pard (disambiguation) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pard (disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onlk (talk) 15:35, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of We have met the enemy

 

The article We have met the enemy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails to meet the criteria for a disambiguation page per WP:D as neither page cited is specifically about the quote

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Deceit (1999 film)

 

The article Deceit (1999 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This stub has apparently been unsourced for the 13 years since it was created. The fact that it was created by Neelix does not provide confidence in the likelihood of finding sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:28, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

"Ambrosial" listed at Redirects for discussion

  The redirect Ambrosial has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 16 § Ambrosial until a consensus is reached. Q𝟤𝟪 07:35, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Gil Perkins as Bluebeard (Batman).jpg

 

Thanks for uploading File:Gil Perkins as Bluebeard (Batman).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:11, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

"Land where silk comes from" listed at Redirects for discussion

  The redirect Land where silk comes from has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 26 § Land where silk comes from until a consensus is reached. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:52, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Carl Frederick

 

The article Carl Frederick has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable physicist, probable vanity article, no independent sigcov.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jdcooper (talk) 18:38, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

"Esthetical" listed at Redirects for discussion

  The redirect Esthetical has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 30 § Esthetical until a consensus is reached. - car chasm (talk) 17:58, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

"Esthetically" listed at Redirects for discussion

  The redirect Esthetically has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 30 § Esthetically until a consensus is reached. - car chasm (talk) 17:59, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

"Æsthetically" listed at Redirects for discussion

  The redirect Æsthetically has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 30 § Æsthetically until a consensus is reached. - car chasm (talk) 17:59, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jinhua (given name)

 

The article Jinhua (given name) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Same problems as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mengjie. This page lists multiple given names with nothing to do with each other except that they're transliterated the same way when tones are omitted.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:9th Street (Manhattan)

  Hello, Neelix. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:9th Street (Manhattan), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Hackworks

  Hello, Neelix. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hackworks, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:9th Street (Manhattan)

 

Hello, Neelix. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "9th Street".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:24, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Happyvalleygoosebay.JPG

 

Thanks for uploading File:Happyvalleygoosebay.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Hackworks

 

Hello, Neelix. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hackworks".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 17:22, 26 July 2023 (UTC)