Open main menu


Hello Compy90! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking Button sig2.png or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! ▪◦▪=Sirex98= 04:32, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Contents

License tagging for Image:Michael Binger.jpgEdit

Thanks for uploading Image:Michael Binger.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:10, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

ImageEdit

I'll see if I can find a fair use image of Binger, I see you have made edits here for a while but you never got a welcome, so I thought I would do so. :) ▪◦▪=Sirex98= 04:38, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Super Bowl XLI page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. MichaelMaggs 22:04, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:J.C. Tran.jpgEdit

Thanks for uploading Image:J.C. Tran.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:06, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:J.C. Tran.jpgEdit

Thank you for uploading Image:J.C. Tran.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Jay32183 23:38, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Deeb during heads-up playEdit

You said in the edit summary that "Deeb was never behind during heads-up play" are you sure or is cardplayer's reports wrong?

From cardplayer.com "At one point during heads-up play with Fitoussi, Deeb was out-chipped about $2 million to $14 million. The final hand of the event was dealt around 5 a.m. Friday. The final table started 2 p.m. Thursday." ▪◦▪≡ЅiREX≡Talk 06:05, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

It looks as the other report was incorrect; this article contradicts what they had written earlier.▪◦▪≡ЅiREX≡Talk 07:29, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

In the newsEdit

The Article you created on Jerry Yang (poker player) in now featured on the Main Page section "In the news". nice work ▪◦▪≡ЅiREX≡Talk 12:52, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Nevermind they pulled it, see here Template_talk:In_the_news#Jerry_Yang ▪◦▪≡ЅiREX≡Talk 15:57, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

deleted categoryEdit

I just saw you deleted Category:African poker players|Rahme,Raymond from Raymond Rahme and I wanted to ask why. Just because a category doesn´t exist yet is no reason to delete it in the first place... (sorry for posting it on your user page the first time :/) --Elconejo 22:55, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of number one ranked playersEdit

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of number one ranked players, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. PrimeHunter (talk) 04:34, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Overhauling Event PagesEdit

Seeing as you are among those who update these things the most, how would you feel about overhauling the WPT, EPT, APPT and LAPT results pages to conform to the final table formats used in the WSOP? It seems that the tables with payouts and other information are far more clean and useful than the lists currently used for results. It would require a little more research to dig back for numbers and such, but I wanted to get some opinions. Stsharp413 (talk) 19:20, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

We are good to go. The important information should be X-Day Event, the Dates, Prize Pool, Payouts, and which casino it was in. Also, the buy-ins do differ, so we need to mention that either in the title (which should just be the name of the event) or add another heading above the final table results. Winning hand info might be hard to get for the older events, but we can do without that for now. We can always add that back in later. Stsharp413 (talk) 05:28, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

I used the LAPT Season 1 page as a good test. So far, looks fine to me. Check it out here LAPT Season 1 Stsharp413 (talk) 05:53, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

2009 WSOPEdit

Back in town after missing the first few events. Here's to good editing from all! Stsharp413 (talk) 18:15, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

last updatedEdit

Hey Compy,

I noticed that you created the Brock Parker article... thanks. When you update Poker players could you start adding the "|last updated=" parameter to the user box? That way we know when it was updated and whether or not it needs to be updated again.---I'm Spartacus! NO! I'm Spartacus! 22:24, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Updating WSOP resultsEdit

Hey Compy,

Thanks for your dilligence in updatin the WSOP results... it is great! But I would love to have you indulge me in a small favor. When updating the results, could you use an edit summary with the persons name an place? Kind of like what I did here?---Balloonman NO! I'm Spartacus! 04:53, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

November NineEdit

Please take a look at and if you want contribute to discussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Poker#November_Nine. 2005 (talk) 22:09, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

EPT part2Edit

Hello, I do not know if you're aware but the 2nd part of the EPT Season 6 is available http://www.europeanpokertour.com/tournaments/deauville/ --Tinken974 (talk) 17:36, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Nice job :D —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tinken974 (talkcontribs) 18:49, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

About the "Notable Acheivments" edit...Edit

WSOP lied to me!!JaeDyWolf ~ Baka-San (talk) 23:20, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

WSOP Bracelet Winners TFDEdit

Given your editorial involvement in World Series of Poker, I thought you might want to comment at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion#Template:2000s_WSOP_Bracelet_Winners.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:31, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

2011 World Series of PokerEdit

Please try to complete the reference column at 2011 World Series of Poker when a tournament ends. Also add the same ref at 2011 World Series of Poker results.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:24, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. Try ot get the date fields correct.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:10, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Template:2010s WSOP Bracelet WinnersEdit

Template:2010s WSOP Bracelet Winners is falling behind. Do you want to keep this up to date too and place it on the proper pages?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 16:19, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

WSOP Bracelet Winners template discussionEdit

As a person who I believe is interested in the Bracelet Winners templates, I feel you might like to leave your input regarding the recent major edit. Feel free to join the discussion here. JaeDyWolf ~ Baka-San (talk) 22:16, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of David Rheem for deletionEdit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Rheem is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Rheem until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Petiatil »Talk 08:37, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

WSOP POYEdit

I see that you added {{World Series of Poker Player of the Year Award Winners}} to Ben Lamb. I do not think this is correct. According to the formula main events offer 500 for 1st and 350 for 2nd. Chris Moorman (486.20) and Shawn Buchanan (505.51) are among the final 44 alive in the 2011 World Series of Poker Europe main event. Both could surpass 759.05 with either a first or a second place finish. Others could surpass him with a first place finish only including Jake Cody (313.13). Do you have a reason to believe that the WSOPE main event does not accrue main event points? Even if it is just a regular event first place will earn 382.5 points for first and 267.75 for second making Moorman and Buchanan still eligible with wins and Buchanan eligible with second regardless.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 21:08, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Hellmuth was the only person who could score enough points to force Lamb to win, but many are close enough to force him to have to improve his position to earn the POY. With Moorman and Amir Lehavot running first and second with 40 left, Lamb is probably a current underdog to the field right now.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:04, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
With 36 left I think Jake Cody and Amir Lehavot can take first by winning, while Chris Moorman and Shawn Buchanan only need second. I don't know Tony G's real name, but with the 43rd place elimination of Sean Getzwiller, I don't think anyone else remains alive. Probably overstated a bit as a dog to the field, but the six possibilities are as follows (assuming main event points for WSOPE main event) given Lambs point totals 9th-759.05, 8th 779.05, 7th 799.05, 6th 824.05, 5th 849.05, 4th 879.05, 3rd 909.05, 2nd 1009.05, 1st 1159.05:
  1. Jake Cody 1st 813.13 - requires Lamb to finish 6th at November Nine.
  2. Amir Lehavot 1st 830.75 - requires Lamb to finish 5th
  3. Chris Moorman 2nd (and not Buchanan winning) 836.20 - requires Lamb to finish 5th
  4. Shawn Buchanan 2nd (and not Moorman winning) 855.51 - requires Lamb to finish 4th
  5. Chris Moorman 1st 986.20 - requires Lamb to finish 2nd
  6. Shawn Buchanan 1st 1005.51 - requires Lamb to finish 2nd.

However, I don't know Tony G's real name, so there may be other possible hurdles. --TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:28, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

P.S. if the WSOPE main event is a regular event then there are only three bad outcomes for Lamb.

  1. Shawn Buchanan 2nd (and not Moorman winning) 772.51 - requires Lamb to finish 8th
  2. Chris Moorman 1st 868.70 - requires Lamb to finish 4th
  3. Shawn Buchanan 1st 888.01 - requires Lamb to finish 3rd.

Also, the end of day three sees a lot of danger for Lamb with Moorman 2nd, Lehavot 3rd, Buchanan 4th and Cody 16th with 25 remaining.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 00:35, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

I just realized that there may be a lot more players that can catch him because I am not sure if people who ITMed the WSOP main event have points included on the Bluff scoreboard.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:04, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Revised situationEdit

Yes WSOP points are omited even for people already busted out. Thus, the six possibilities are as follows (assuming main event points for WSOPE main event) given Lambs point totals 9th-759.05, 8th 779.05, 7th 799.05, 6th 824.05, 5th 849.05, 4th 879.05, 3rd 909.05, 2nd 1009.05, 1st 1159.05:

  1. Amir Lehavot 1st 830.75 - requires Lamb to finish 5th at November Nine.
  2. Chris Moorman 2nd (and not Buchanan winning) 836.20 - requires Lamb to finish 5th
  3. Jake Cody 1st 838.13 - requires Lamb to finish 5th
  4. Shawn Buchanan 2nd (and not Moorman winning) 855.51 - requires Lamb to finish 4th
  5. Chris Moorman 1st 986.20 - requires Lamb to finish 2nd
  6. Shawn Buchanan 1st 1005.51 - requires Lamb to finish 2nd.

However, I don't know Tony G's real name, so there may be other possible hurdles. --TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:28, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

P.S. if the WSOPE main event is a regular event then there are only three bad outcomes for Lamb.

  1. Shawn Buchanan 2nd (and not Moorman winning) 772.51 - requires Lamb to finish 8th
  2. Chris Moorman 1st 868.70 - requires Lamb to finish 4th
  3. Shawn Buchanan 1st 888.01 - requires Lamb to finish 3rd.
  • It's looking better for Lamb with Lehavot-15th, Cody-7th and Buchanan-6th. Just Moorman left to worry about. Moorman is in 2nd with 5 remaining.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:46, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Moorman finished 2nd. Not sure whether that means he is ahead and Lamb needs to finish 5th (WSOPE ME gets main event points) or Lamb has clinched (WSOPE ME a regular scale event). [http://www.bluffmagazine.com/wsop-poy/ this page will probably update tomorrow with the correct numbers.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:59, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

NotificationEdit

You should read this.[1] ...William 14:03, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Compy, it would go a long way toward making a case for yourself if you took the time to comment on this report. Wikipedia is a collaborative editing environment that only functions well if editors are willing to engage in discourse when called for. It's called for now. --Laser brain (talk) 02:53, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
I'm making a second request that you go to AN/I and explain yourself. If you do not, it is likely that you will be blocked from editing until you are willing to be communicative and answer concerns that you are editing against consensus (such as changing nationalities from Scotland to GBR) and introducing incorrect information. --Laser brain (talk) 16:21, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
Compy90, it appears that you are continuing to edit elsewhere on Wikipedia while ignoring the concerns expressed at ANI. This strategy may not end well for you. EdJohnston (talk) 18:27, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Compy90, I'm sorry to say that I have had to block you since you continue to edit without addressing or discussing the problems that have been raised with your edits. The block is indefinite, but it may be lifted without my consultation by any administrator who is satisfied that you have adequately addressed and discussed the issues raised at the above-noted AN/I thread. I urge you to join the discussion and be more communicative with other editors. This is a collaborative environment. --Laser brain (talk) 14:17, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
  • You can ask for your block to be lifted by posting {{unblock|reason=Your reason here}} here at your talk page. EdJohnston (talk) 15:20, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

First unblock requestEdit

{{unblock|reason=I really don't see how adding a brief summary of a major golf tournament, information that I obtained mostly from the official USGA and R&A websites, counts as "disruptive editing". If anyone sees a problem with anything I wrote they are free to edit it. Everything I wrote on all the pages is referenced in the two pages I added as external links on each page, so it's not like I was just making stuff up. I read what was written in the AN/I and have perfectly valid reasons for each of the edits I made. It appears like the only factual mistake I made was what I wrote about Jim Thorpe, and I fully acknowledge that mistake. As I have said, everything else I wrote on both the U.S. Open and Open Championship pages is referenced in the sites I added as external links, which I believe are as valid a source as I could get. Unfortunately, I had never heard of the Google News Search when I first started editing these pages, so I did not use that source. If one of those sites I used is shown to contain wrong information, then I can't be held responsible for that. Another thing I noticed was mentioned often in the AN/I is the changing of nationalities. The reason I did that is because the players were listed as GBR on the R&A website, and that is the information I copied down and used (with the exception of Dai Rees, who I noticed someone changed to Wales so I used that from that time on). I never touched the round summaries for the first three rounds, so that is why the information might appear to conflict. It is for these reasons that I am requesting the block be lifted, and I can continue to contribute to Wikipedia's resources on the history of this wonderful game that I love.}}

There's a huge number of problems listed at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User Compy90. It is hard to consider unblocking you if you're planning to go ahead with more of the same. You remove existing citations and when you add new statements to an article, you don't add new citations to go with them. People have found many factual mistakes in what you've added. There is no evidence that you are willing to go point-by-point through problems that are drawn to your attention. For Wikipedia, you are a net liability because people have to clean up after you. In the year 2012 you have never left a comment on an article talk page. EdJohnston (talk) 03:12, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Second unblock requestEdit

 
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Compy90 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I didn't remove existing citations, almost all of the pages had none to begin with. For every page I referenced the two sources where I received all of my information, you could easily check my work against those two sources if you wish and I think I will come out looking pretty good. I don't know how I am a net liability to Wikipedia, I've had an account for 7 years and made over 3,000 edits before I touched any of these golf pages, with nobody reporting any problem with anything I had ever written. If the main problem is that I didn't include citations within the article, I admit I did not because I added the references at the end of the page. I will do so in the future if that is required.

Decline reason:

One open request at a time, please. — Daniel Case (talk) 17:46, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

I've left a note at User_talk:WilliamJE#Compy90 to see if William will come here to discuss with you directly. He is the golf editor who opened the ANI thread about you. EdJohnston (talk) 04:04, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Compy90, you say "I didn't remove existing citations", but at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents, in the subsection headed "Removal of inline citations", there is a list of five edits of yours, every one of which involves removing one or more citations. Have you actually read the section about you at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents? If not, then I suggest you do so, and if you have then I suggest that you try to address the issues raised there. If you ignore many of the issues raised, and deny others which anyone can check and find to be valid, then you will not be encouraging any administrator to unblock you. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:12, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Compy just as an FYI, Syrex98 asked me to take a look at what is going on here due to our past interactions on the Poker articles and how valuable you've been during the WSOP season which is about to begin. Unfortunately, I don't think I can unblock (even if I thought it was appropriate I couldn't because of WP:INVOLVE). You've been blocked for one reason, you refused to discuss the issue despite repeated attempts/warnings to get a response. From my experience with you, that is atypical behavior. But before anybody is going to unblock, you have to agree to discuss the issues and see if you and the people who raised the ANI report can work out the details. (Elsewise, the person levelling the complaint's accusations are taken at face value.) I hope you get this cleared up, the WSOP is just around the corner.---Balloonman Poppa Balloon 15:40, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Compy90 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Ok, I'll address each of the issues in the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. I left in the quote about the golf course in the 1970 U.S. Open, which is referenced in the two sources I added. I removed the mention of Tom Watson in 1975 because he wasn't mentioned in my sources and didn't fit in the narrative I was writing, but that reference has been put back and I am okay with that. For the course location, I always used the town that the USGA Championship Database used, and when that proved to be a disambiguation notice I went back and changed it. The edit from 1986 appears simply to be a mistake on my part, miscounting the golfers listed on the USGA Championship Database. Again, the 1994 edit was simply a typo on my part, one I didn't catch when reviewing my work (I'm only human). Two mistakes in over 100 years of edits isn't that bad. Now for the content mistakes, I already admitted I made an error on the Jim Thorpe information. For the information about Ben Hogan in 1960, the USGA Championship Database says this: "Ben Hogan, hoping for an unprecedented fifth Open title, hit all 18 greens in regulation of his morning round to shoot 69 to get within three of the lead." I wrote that he was within three shots of the lead in my edit based on this information. It never says that he tied for the lead, so I was unaware that he did as this was one of two sources I used. Now for the Open Championship edits, again, as in the U.S. Open edits, I included the R&A website and the About.com golf section as references at the bottom of the page, and it is from those two sources that I obtained all of my information. For the course par changes, I used the information contained on the R&A website in the course descriptions, as well as from future tournaments held on the same course where the score was included on Wikipedia. Since the tournament summaries I used didn't mention the par, unlike for the U.S. Open, this was the only method I could think of to get correct information. The previous information doesn't cite any source either, so it is uncertain if I was right or not. As for the nationalities, I already mentioned that I used the information contained on the R&A website for that, which lists the golfers as GBR. I hope this summary clears up a little of my methodology.

Accept reason:

You seem willing to communicate and edit constructively, so please don't take advantage of this. Best of luck in your future editing endeavours! :) Keilana|Parlez ici 05:32, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Hopefully I am posting in the right spot. I'm the editor who brought this issue to ANI.
I didn't want this editor blocked but only went to the board to get him to change his ways and explain himself. Since the get go I felt he was knowledgeable about golf but mistake prone. These golf articles needed fleshing out. Before going to ANI I had made about 6 attempts to communicate with Compy90 about my concerns only to be ignored or told blanketly that he believed he was right.
That's past and now for the present. He's admitted to some sloppiness and I think this is a lesson about what needs to be done so these articles can be quality work. I'm willing to work with Compy90,(I go through golf articles all the time looking for mistakes) show him the tricks I have for finding reliable sources(golf.com is a private website. It's information is pretty good to very good but the content they have comes from somewhere else and doesn't originate there.) Google News Archive and Sports Illustrated are very good ones.(Compy90 used the later when him and I had a dispute a fact over the 77 Open.[2] So he has shown what can be done.) The tour websites are better than golf.com, the tournament websites generally even better. All websites have mistakes(I like Google News archive or SI because the articles there are written up at the time they happened. Mistaken info doesn't happen as much) if Compy90 copied from any website and I find some fact in error, I'll fix it and WP:AGF and drop him a heads up at the same time.
  • What I ask is he inline citation where he gets the info so I know what to check.
  • Use reliable sources, Google news archive, SI, and the the others, like I suggest above.
  • Use any working(dead links can be removed) inline citations that are already in the article. They're a good source for information.
  • If he has questions about some facts, all he need do is drop me a message on my talk page. I'm in here daily and I get email notifications too. He can count on me being back to him very quickly.
  • Not to change golfers nationalities unless the tournament article is in conflict with the player's WP article. He can contact me if he has questions.
To be honest, I think Compy90 can do very good work. He has shown it already. I should only have to do very minor tweaks(or even none at all) to his work if he follows my suggestions above.
Just a parting joke. We're having a Captain Kirk/Nomad moment when Compy90 wrote 'Two mistakes in over 100 years of edits'. Now its three but no sterilization will take place.(End of joke) I made errors too in this post. That's the reason I'm fixing it 90 minutes later.
I got to get out of here and do non-WP stuff. So I'll check back this evening or tomorrow morning Florida time....William
Having worked with Compy for several years on Poker articles, I agree he can do good work... The Poker Project appreciates his work. I'm sorry that this ended up where it did.---Balloonman Poppa Balloon 21:48, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
I've made a request at WP:AN to have this reviewed by another admin. I think based upon the above and the comments of the original blocker, your block should have been lifted already. But I can't do it because of our edit history; I am definitely biased in your favor. But I hope somebody comes along and either unblocks or explain why such an action isn't warranted.---Balloonman Poppa Balloon 05:17, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

GA ReassessmentEdit

World Series of Poker Europe, an article that you may be interested in, has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the good article reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. -- KTC (talk) 23:46, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

2012 World Series of PokerEdit

Hello,

I would like to know why you reverted my edit about the 2012 World Series of Poker.

Thank you!

TheMillionRabbit (talk) 21:49, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

It was a meaningless section. What was so special about that tournament that it needed its own section? You might has well have created a section for every tournament, which of course is ridiculous.

Thank you for your answer!TheMillionRabbit (talk) 02:26, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:BLPN#Howard_Lederer_commentson Chris Ferguson: A BLP questionEdit

Heya, I hope all is well with you. I feel you might like to click the link above for an interesting BLP issue relating to poker... if only for an interesting conversation! All the best. JaeDyWolf ~ Baka-San (talk) 04:07, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Matthew AshtonEdit

Orlady (talk) 05:52, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Template maintenance requestEdit

Good mornings from a knackered Brit sitting in an airport! I'm going to be spending the next ~24 hours or so flying to America and I'm not sure at what point after that I'll be able to get ahold of the Internet again. May I request for you to update Template:2010s WSOP Bracelet Winners template for me? I'd anticipate it'd just be for the winners of the two current tourneys. Thank you very much :) JaeDyWolf ~ Baka-San (talk) 01:15, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

October 2013Edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to World Series of Poker may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {| class="wikitable sortable"
  • |{{nts|1,954,054

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:04, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

  The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
You work among poker related article have been amazing. Awesome job with updating the WSOP and keep up the great work!!! Valoem talk contrib 10:59, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Talk:2015 PGA ChampionshipEdit

Please see Talk:2015 PGA Championship about a table you created in the article 2015 PGA Championship. H Padleckas (talk) 06:38, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

Thank you.... Please see response. H Padleckas (talk) 22:46, 21 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!Edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Buddy RyanEdit

 On 1 July 2016, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Buddy Ryan, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:57, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!Edit

 Hello, Compy90. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

AppreciationEdit

I appreciate all of your work on this site. Hope all is well for you outside of the Wiki. Red Director (talk) 20:08, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

ITN recognition for 2017 Masters TournamentEdit

 On 10 April 2017, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2017 Masters Tournament, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT♦C 17:58, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Alec TorelliEdit

As an expert in this field would you be interested in participating in this Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alec Torelli. Valoem talk contrib 01:50, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

SignatureEdit

Hi. Your current signature has an unpaired <sub> tag at the end of it, which causes later content on the page to be subscripted. Cheers --LukeSurl t c 13:40, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter messageEdit

 Hello, Compy90. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ITN recognition for 2018 Masters TournamentEdit

 On 10 April 2018, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2018 Masters Tournament, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 03:13, 10 April 2018 (UTC)

ITN recognition for 2018 Open ChampionshipEdit

 On 24 July 2018, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2018 Open Championship, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 23:33, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

ThanksEdit

I meant to put in "Oliver" Fisher, not "ross". Thanks for fixing that. Johnsmith2116 (talk) 12:27, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve World Poker Tour season 17 resultsEdit

Hi, I'm Meatsgains. Compy90, thanks for creating World Poker Tour season 17 results!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Meatsgains(talk) 01:23, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter messageEdit

 Hello, Compy90. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter messageEdit

 Hello, Compy90. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jeongeun Lee6Edit

Hello, Compy90,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Snowycats and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Jeongeun Lee6, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Snowycats}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Snowycats (talk) 03:27, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

ITN recognition for 2019 U.S. Open (golf)Edit

 On 18 June 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2019 U.S. Open (golf), which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.

Stephen 01:34, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "Compy90".