Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 10

Copying within Wikipedia

You did not identify the source of the material in your edit. It appears to be Proto-Indo-European mythology. Copying within Wikipedia is acceptable but it must be attributed.

This type of edit does get picked up by Copy Patrol and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. However, for future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, linking to the source article and adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved.

While best practices are that attribution should be added to the edit summary at the time the edit is made, the linked article on best practices describes the appropriate steps to add attribution after the fact. I hope you will do so.

I've noticed that this guideline is not very well known, even among editors with tens of thousands of edits, so it isn't surprising that I point this out to some veteran editors, but there are some t's that need to be crossed.S Philbrick(Talk) 14:40, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia

You did not identify the source of the material in your edit. It appears to be Proto-Indo-European mythology. Copying within Wikipedia is acceptable but it must be attributed.

This type of edit does get picked up by Copy Patrol and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. However, for future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, linking to the source article and adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved.

While best practices are that attribution should be added to the edit summary at the time the edit is made, the linked article on best practices describes the appropriate steps to add attribution after the fact. I hope you will do so.

I've noticed that this guideline is not very well known, even among editors with tens of thousands of edits, so it isn't surprising that I point this out to some veteran editors, but there are some t's that need to be crossed.S Philbrick(Talk) 14:41, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Many other examples as well. S Philbrick(Talk) 14:42, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Meitei temples moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Meitei temples, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 14:43, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Moirang Ningthourol Lambuba moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Moirang Ningthourol Lambuba, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 14:44, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Meitei scriptures moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Meitei scriptures, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 14:47, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Panthoibi Khongul

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Panthoibi Khongul requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.schoolandcollegelistings.com/IN/Canchipur/1680269512052250/The-Readers-Book-Store. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 TT me 23:43, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Silent reading

  Hello, Immanuelle. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Silent reading, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Kaireima moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kaireima, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 03:19, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Vervaeke (March 2)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bearcat was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Bearcat (talk) 20:53, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
 
Hello, Immanuelle! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bearcat (talk) 20:53, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Time of day (March 3)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Pbritti were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Pbritti (talk) 16:27, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Elinruby (talk) 04:02, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

ANI

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Elinruby (talk) 04:03, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kiki (Shinto) (March 5)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Twinkle1990 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Twinkle1990 (talk) 03:21, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Lam Lai moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lam Lai, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 11:19, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Saijin

 

Hello, Immanuelle. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Saijin".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:51, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deh₂nu, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ara, Ari and Danava.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Infobox claims

Hello, Immanuelle. I noticed that you've been adding the names of various Indo-European deities to infoboxes on Greek and Roman deities, without any supporting scholarly sources there or in the main body of the article. An infobox is supposed to summarize material already sourced in the main article, and no more than that. All content in articles must be supported by up-to-date, mainstream, reliable scholarly sources - even the most seemingly obvious, well-known examples, such as Roman Mercury and Greek Hermes. So much more for ever-debatable resemblances to Indo-European deities, such as Pehuson, whose name and identity are merely proposed rather than definite (something stated very clearly by you in the introduction to his article.) What you've produced there seems well-written, readable and well-sourced but it also attempts a full-on reconstruction from scholarly surmise. I'd call that original research. Please don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you wish (either here or on talk pages of articles concerned.) Thank you! Haploidavey (talk) 08:45, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Neo-Nazism in Russia has a new comment

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Neo-Nazism in Russia. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 17:47, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Removing spaces in infobox parm

Please don't remove spaces between the parameter names and the equal signs ("=") as you did here, as there is no good reason to do this. Thanks, Paul August 14:13, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

I did it by accident, will avoid in the future. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) the best Wikipedian [1] 07:30, 9 March 2023 (UTC)
Thanks. Paul August 12:06, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ {{SUBST:Cite book |last=Leonhart |first=Immanuelle |title=Mefitations |year=2023 |language=English}}

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Demonstration

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Demonstration, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 14:25, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shrine Parishioner Registration (March 10)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 16:34, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
 
Hello, Immanuelle! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 16:34, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kawachi dynasty

 

The article Kawachi dynasty has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not notable, possibly fringe

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Hichan Hilao moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Hichan Hilao, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 12:31, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Konthoujam Nongarol moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Konthoujam Nongarol, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 12:32, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Leishemlon moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Leishemlon, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 12:33, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Sakok Lamlen moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sakok Lamlen, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 12:33, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Mangka Mayanglambam moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mangka Mayanglambam, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 12:33, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Hada Samadon Ayangba moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Hada Samadon Ayangba, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 12:34, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Angom (clan) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Angom (clan), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 12:58, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Tutenglon moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tutenglon, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 12:59, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Toreirol Lambuba moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Toreirol Lambuba, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 12:59, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Chada Laihui moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Chada Laihui, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 12:59, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Chengleiron moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Chengleiron, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 12:59, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Ningthou Kangbalon moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ningthou Kangbalon, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 13:00, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Khuman Kangleirol moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Khuman Kangleirol, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 13:00, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Meitei death ceremony moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Meitei death ceremony, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 13:15, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kajin Poets

 

The article Kajin Poets has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not very good and I doubt I'll be able to improve it much

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Tokoyo has a new comment

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tokoyo. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:52, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

I am confused. You have created a long chain of redirects from Tokoyo to Mount Horai to Horai to Mount Penglai. Is that what you intended? Double redirects are undesirable in Wikipedia because the reader only navigates one redirect at a time, so that a double redirect leaves the reader on a redirect page. Sometimes a bot sets them to the final target. Do you want all of those titles to point to Mount Penglai? I think that Tokoyo should be a disambiguation page, because it is also the fictional character and a misspelling. Did you really intend to create a chain of redirects? Robert McClenon (talk) 22:14, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

@Robert McClenon my understanding was that immediately after a bot would fix the double redirects and point all pages to Mount Penglai. It occurred because I kept getting the title wrong several times, although seeing with some other pages it is clear the bot doesn't work nearly as reliably as I thought it did. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 00:21, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
Also you are right on the notability of A Story of Oki Islands. It has issues but seems to be more replicated in the anglophone world than I thought, but unknown elsewhere. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 00:24, 13 March 2023 (UTC)
You have discovered what I was saying, which is that the bot sometimes fixes the double redirects quickly, and sometimes doesn't fix them quickly. I have made Tokoyo into a disambiguation page. I think that you and I now have the redirects taken care of, and the disambiguation page. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:32, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sophia University student Yasukuni Shrine refusal case (March 13)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vinegarymass911 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Vinegarymass911 (talk) 17:33, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Susa Shrine

 

Hello, Immanuelle. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Susa Shrine".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:10, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frank Amodeo (March 14)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Akevsharma (talk) 01:54, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nymphs (Indo-European mythology)

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nymphs (Indo-European mythology) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://slife.org/proto-indo-european-mythology/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 TT me 10:51, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

I have declined the speedy deletion. The article, at creation, included an edit summary identifying the Wikipedia article from which the material was copied providing the necessary attribution. This is not a copyright violation. Whpq (talk) 11:57, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Heidi (god)
added a link pointing to Mercury
Taibai Jinxing
added a link pointing to Baidi

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Star Game

  Hello, Immanuelle. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Star Game, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Editing restrictions

Hi, per this ANI discussion, the following restrictions have been imposed on you:

  • Immanuelle is limited to one user account.
  • Immanuelle is prohibited from using any AI-assisted editing tools, or machine translation from any language, in any article or draft. They must also ensure that no content added to articles violates copyright.
  • Immanuelle is prohibited from self-publishing articles to mainspace or reverting draftification. Any new articles must be submitted via Wikipedia:Articles for creation.
  • Immanuelle must not merge content into other articles as a response to having a draft declined or an article nominated for deletion.

As per my closing statement, I am also warning you that even within these restrictions you should edit carefully and make sure you edit only where you can follow all applicably policies, including WP:V. Galobtter (pingó mió) 06:50, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

@Galobtter I want to confirm that the restriction on creating articles does not apply to creation of redirects? Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 07:58, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Yes, that's correct. Galobtter (pingó mió) 08:24, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi Immanuelle, I am glad that you do not seem to be unhappy about your editing restrictions, but I am worried about some of your new drafts since you received this notification. For example, you have linked Draft:Fuyo Shrine to the Japanese Wikipedia page, but all of the information in your draft appears to be incorrect (it links to Buyeo, an ancient kingdom in Manchuria, rather than Buyeo County in South Korea; the shrine was never established, so it wasn't run by anyone during the colonial period, and there was no war damage in South Korea, so it would not have been destroyed during the war). Did you get this from the Japanese page? If so, how are you adding information to your draft?
Similarly, Draft:Tambov Men's Gymnasium cites one source, in Russian. How are you determining the content of that source? Best, Dekimasuよ! 17:01, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
Please note that changing the source does not address my underlying question here, since it appears you obtained the information from somewhere else, and are now changing the source to one in English. Dekimasuよ! 17:18, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
@Dekimasu for Draft:Fuyo Shrine that's what the article Modern system of ranked Shinto shrines implied. I think the article should be changed if this is not the case. The Buyeo link was just an error because I was using the text editor.
As for Draft:Tambov Men's Gymnasium that's the source in Nikolai Fyodorovich Fyodorov for the same claim. I since found an English language source also supporting this and added it to the article too.
I've been making a lot of drafts because since I can't make articles in mainspace I'm gonna work on a lot over time. So most of these drafts are ones I don't intend on submit until a long time later since my criteria for submission is having managed to source everything with English language sources, as well as establishing notability. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 17:31, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
Modern system of ranked Shinto shrines says about this shrine: "Fuyo jinja – Buyeo County, Korea – now extinct". I don't know how you could get from that to "it was run by the Japanese occupation of Korea and later destroyed in the war", but that is not what "extinct" (actually should be something like "not extant") means here. Regarding the Draft:Tambov Men's Gymnasium source, I would advise you strongly not to add cites to any foreign language sources you cannot read yourself. Your argument here was that it's the source used at Nikolai Fyodorovich Fyodorov, but you were also the editor who added it to that page. Of course the addition on that page was before these editing restrictions were imposed, but it still implies that no one on the English Wikipedia has actually determined (based upon reading the original Russian) whether that is an adequate source for what was written, so it really should not be reapplied elsewhere. Please be sure that there is a human processing information from start (processing a known language) to finish (adding it to an article). Dekimasuよ! 17:49, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
I will follow that in the future. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 17:59, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Dynasty replacement theory

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Dynasty replacement theory indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 02:02, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Obscene sacrifice

 

Hello, Immanuelle. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Obscene sacrifice".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:20, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Obscene temple

 

Hello, Immanuelle. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Obscene temple".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:20, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chenwei

 

The article Chenwei has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doubt I have the ability to improve this page. Proposing for deletion unless someone thinks they can do better with it

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Sanamahi Kachin moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Sanamahi Kachin, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 13:18, 18 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Womb tattoo (March 19)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 09:29, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
 
Hello, Immanuelle! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 09:29, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Shinrikyo moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Shinrikyo, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 11:22, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

@Onel5969@Dekimasu so I think I remember something about not being allowed to merge articles which have been proposed for deletion or draftified. I want to merge this into Sect Shinto, as I do with some of the other 13 shinto sects. Am I prohibited from this? Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 15:55, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
Hi. No, there's no prohibition about merging draftified articles. Or ones which have been proposed for deletion through PROD. The only prohibition is to not merge/move an article which is at an open AfD. Onel5969 TT me 16:06, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
The section with the closer's assessment of the consensus for editing restrictions is still available above on this page. There are two criteria that are related to what you mentioned here: first, if you submit a draft and it is declined, then the content must not be merged into other articles, and second, material cannot be merged during a deletion discussion, and one15969 noted. The editing restrictions do not say anything about draftification, except that you should not move drafts back to the main article space yourself, so the case you presented seems all right in theory. However, please be careful: if the information in the draftified article is based upon machine translation of sources you cannot read directly, or if it was produced by AI, please do not reproduce it again by merging it. That is the spirit of the restrictions, regardless of how strictly we interpret them. Best, Dekimasuよ! 20:12, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Misogikyo moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Misogikyo, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 10:49, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Shinshu-kyo moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Shinshu-kyo, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 10:49, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Jikkō kyō moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Jikkō kyō, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 10:50, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Fuso-kyo moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Fuso-kyo, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 10:51, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Tensha Tsuchimikado Shinto moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Tensha Tsuchimikado Shinto, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 10:51, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

"Righteous People's Faith" listed at Redirects for discussion

  The redirect Righteous People's Faith has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 20 § Righteous People's Faith until a consensus is reached. Onel5969 TT me 14:34, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Nymphs (Indo-European mythology) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Nymphs (Indo-European mythology), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 11:42, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Chinese hero cult 2

  Hello, Immanuelle. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chinese hero cult 2, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:03, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Umashiashikabihikoji (March 23)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by InterstellarGamer12321 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 07:54, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Miếu Japanese

  Hello, Immanuelle. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Miếu Japanese, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Goryō faith Japanese

  Hello, Immanuelle. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Goryō faith Japanese, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 29 March 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Bone divination

  Hello, Immanuelle. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bone divination, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 30 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chislobog (March 31)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 02:39, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
 
Hello, Immanuelle! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 02:39, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Religion in the Song dynasty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daoxue.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 1 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Isuzuyori-hime (April 3)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
asilvering (talk) 04:20, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding use of Japanese-language sources

Hello Immanuelle, regarding your editing restrictions, I am concerned that some of your recent draft creations are reliant entirely upon Japanese-language sources, such as Draft:Osaka Gokoku Shrine or Draft:Akita Suwa Shrine. How are you determining the contents of these sources, whether or not they are reliable, etc.? Best, Dekimasuよ! 04:56, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

https://jinja-gosyuin.com/beppyou/ is a simple list of Beppyo shrines which is the citation in that article. The Gokoku shrine part was a paraphrasing of a passage from the Gokoku Shrine article but I decided to get rid of it and replace it with something more informative with an English language source in all such points that I used it. No machine translation was ever used. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 08:05, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for your reply, and OK. But this revision is very similar to what I asked about last time: you were also the editor who added the link to a 1939 document in Japanese to Gokoku Shrines before the editing restriction was put in place, and now it was propagated to another article, presumably without anyone having verified that the original source matched the English in the meantime (and the original source is not that easy to read even for someone who is fluent) or whether it meets the standards for inclusion as a source on the English Wikipedia. And the third source listed, in Japanese, what we normally call the "access date" in English, but gave a date from 2021, two years before the creation of your draft. As for the first source (even the list of shrines is not something you are reading in the original Japanese, right?) I don't see any indication that it is reliable; it is run by two "shrine and temple lovers" who travel around to get shuin. Dekimasuよ! 08:26, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
I’ll try to find one from the Association of Shinto Shrines and verify their presence. I do know enough kanji to read lists. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 09:02, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yodohime jinja (April 5)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Blaze Wolf were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 18:53, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Simu Xin Ding has been accepted

 
Simu Xin Ding, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– Joe (talk) 13:34, 6 April 2023 (UTC)


Your recent contributions to PriHyéh₂

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at PriHyéh₂. Not welcome at da SD (talk) 18:57, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

@Not welcome at da SD that was not vandalism. I just found the correct modernized romanization of the name. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 18:59, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Anarchism

 

Hi Immanuelle,

I saw your work on articles related to anarchism and wanted to say hello, as I work in the topic area too. If you haven't already, you might want to watch our noticeboard for Wikipedia's coverage of anarchism, which is a great place to ask questions, collaborate, discuss style/structure precedent, and stay informed about content related to anarchism. Take a look for yourself!

And if you're looking for other juicy places to edit, consider expanding a stub, adopting a cleanup category, or participating in one of our current formal discussions.

Feel free to say hi on my talk page and let me know if these links were helpful (or at least interesting). Hope to see you around. czar 04:33, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stanytsia Luhanska kindergarten bombing (April 8)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 05:51, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 
Hello, Immanuelle! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:51, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Religion in the Song dynasty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daoxue.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Saga Shrine has a new comment

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Saga Shrine. Thanks! Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 11:52, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Sheshen has a new comment

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sheshen. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 14:35, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
@Robert McClenon I already did it on the talk page here Talk:Tudigong#Proposed split Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 14:39, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tainan Shrine (April 8)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
asilvering (talk) 17:06, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Tainan Shrine has a new comment

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tainan Shrine. Thanks! asilvering (talk) 00:23, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tainan Shrine (April 9)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
asilvering (talk) 01:15, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karasawayama Shrine (April 9)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
asilvering (talk) 03:43, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Time of day

I saw your draft Time of day. I suggest adding material to Civil time rather than creating another article on essentially the same topic. I copied some material from your draft there and edited it. -- Srleffler (talk) 06:22, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

@Srleffler forgive my comment earlier. It's pretty late for me and I hadn't done much on this topic in a while. I appreciate your merging that content in, and I think it really does help with removing some of the modern industrial bias of the article earlier. But there's also a conceptual distinction that I mentioned on the article talk page which I think is impossible to do with the same article as civil time no matter how well it is expanded. Lets keep this on the talk page though so others can see the logic behind it. Please tag me when responding Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 06:48, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Wazui

 

Hello, Immanuelle. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Wazui".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. plicit 06:47, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Star Game

 

Hello, Immanuelle. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Star Game".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:13, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fujo (April 16)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:15, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
 
Hello, Immanuelle! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:15, 16 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Japanese invasion of Taiwan (1616) has been accepted

 
Japanese invasion of Taiwan (1616), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 19:15, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:49.237.39.216

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:49.237.39.216 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ruy (talk) 23:14, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Saw your sig line at CFD

Nice to know I know who the cutest Wikipedian is now!! Hope you're enjoying yourself lots!! Buckshot06 (talk) 23:18, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

@Buckshot06 nice to meet you. Hope things are going well for you too! Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 00:37, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miyazaki Gokoku Shrine (April 23)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Johannes Maximilian were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 07:41, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kumano Taisha (April 23)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by JeffUK were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
JeffUK 23:10, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Great work

I am a professor of Chinese mythology, and I have edited the article on the Dongyue Emperor that you created. This deity has numerous legends and folktales associated with him, making him a suitable subject for a stand-alone article. I have expanded the article for you and highlighted the importance of the Dongyue Emperor in Chinese religion, noting that he is believed to be the manifestation of Cangdi. Other Chinese deities, such as Guanyin, also have multiple incarnations and personification figures. I encourage you to create more articles on Chinese deities on Wikipedia, and I am willing to assist you in this endeavor. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. 49.237.39.216 (talk) 22:26, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Can you please create an article for Niaoge Daolin (乌巢禅师) as a stub? I will expand for you. 49.237.39.216 (talk) 22:29, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
I appreciate your interest in my help, but unfortunately I am not in a good position to help you. I've run into issues with administrators recently which affects my page creation ability and am taking a break from editing compared to what I did earlier. My recommendation would be to make an account here and accumulate enough edits to start making pages on your own. You only need to have an account which is 4 years old and has made ten edits to start making pages yourself. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 22:35, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
I do have an account on Wikipedia, but unfortunately, I have forgotten my password. However, I want to assure you that I am an experienced editor with 9 years of experience on the English Wikipedia. I am familiar with all the policies and rules and will adhere to them while editing. For now, I am happy to edit using my IP address, which changes every hour. I do not need to create a user page to make edits. 49.237.39.216 (talk) 22:51, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
I'd recommend just making a new account if you forgot your password. It is not against the rules to have multiple accounts as long as one has been inactive for a long enough period. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 22:53, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
I'm concerned about what I see on your talk page User_talk:Immanuelle/Archive_4]. If you would like, please feel free to contact me and I can assist you with any article you would like to create on Wikipedia, provided that it meets the notability requirements. 49.237.39.216 (talk) 22:56, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
One that for a long time I've thought needed to be improved was Tianhuang Emperor. Specifically relationships with the title of the Emperor of Japan. I believe it has a history which is not represented on the page.
Is there a way I'll be able to contact you in the future when I am in a more available time period? Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 23:06, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
Also are you familiar with something called the Four Guardian Marshals (四大護法元帥)?
I made a Draft for that article Draft:Niaoge_Daolin which you can edit. I could submit it once you are done if you request it. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 23:09, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
Hi, I have saved the articles Isuzuyori-hime and Draft:Kumano Taisha for you. I hope this makes you happy. I am always glad to help. Cheers!49.237.32.215 (talk) 14:25, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
That makes me really happy. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 14:41, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Tsuchimikado clan

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Tsuchimikado clan indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 05:36, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ritual opera, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vietnamese.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:09, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shinshi (April 25)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:09, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
 
Hello, Immanuelle! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:09, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Saga Shrine has a new comment

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Saga Shrine. Thanks! Newystats (talk) 00:30, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nitta Shrine (April 26)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NP83 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
NP83 (talk) 03:02, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Proto-Indo-European deities has been accepted

 
List of Proto-Indo-European deities, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 06:57, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ikikoku (April 26)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:39, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nymphs (Indo-European mythology) (April 26)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
asilvering (talk) 19:40, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rod of Iron Ministries (April 27)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:58, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Purple Robe Incident has been accepted

 
Purple Robe Incident, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dr vulpes (💬📝) 07:32, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Bone divination

 

Hello, Immanuelle. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bone divination".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:47, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Subjective day moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Subjective day. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Uncle Spock (talk) 18:21, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

@Uncle Spock sorry about that. I put it in the wrong namespace as you could probably tell by the draft template Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 18:39, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Unity of knowledge and action has been accepted

 
Unity of knowledge and action, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 20:35, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ren (ancient surname) (April 29)

 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: As below - agree with merge to Ren (surname)
Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 22:00, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eight surnames of Zhurong has been accepted

 
Eight surnames of Zhurong, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 22:01, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Immanuelle. Thank you for your work on Kumano Taisha. User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice job on the article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 TT me 11:35, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Actual Idealism

 

Hello, Immanuelle. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Actual Idealism".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. plicit 00:49, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Barnstar

  The Systemic Bias Barnstar
For continual high quality editing on neglected Chinese and Japanese topics and pages. Poketama (talk) 04:47, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
This makes me super super happy to see. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 05:13, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jillian Weise (May 1)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MurielMary were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
MurielMary (talk) 09:50, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Metal Rooster

 

Hello, Immanuelle. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Metal Rooster".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. plicit 12:47, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Category:Naritasan has been nominated for deletion

 

Category:Naritasan has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 17:44, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Married Couple Rocks

  Hello, Immanuelle. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Married Couple Rocks, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:45, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Inbe clan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Awa Province.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wazui

Hello Immanuelle,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Wazui for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Wazui to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

greyzxq talk 21:03, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Nah it's good to delete it Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 21:05, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gokanseki Shrine

Hello Immanuelle,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Gokanseki Shrine for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Gokanseki Shrine to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

greyzxq talk 21:50, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Draft:Automatic theocracy into Draft:Unification Church political views. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:32, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Category:Shukuyodo deities has been nominated for deletion

 

Category:Shukuyodo deities has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:11, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Category:Supporters of the Aryan idea has been nominated for deletion

 

Category:Supporters of the Aryan idea has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:25, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Links to draft articles

  Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Ise Grand Shrine. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:36, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Category:Churches by Patron Saint has been nominated for deletion

 

Category:Churches by Patron Saint has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:48, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Category:Rāgarāja has been nominated for deletion

 

Category:Rāgarāja has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 11:58, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Category:Tenjin faith has been nominated for renaming

 

Category:Tenjin faith has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:28, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Category:Unofficial Gokoku Shrines has been nominated for deletion

 

Category:Unofficial Gokoku Shrines has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:35, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Category:Setsumatsusha has been nominated for deletion

 

Category:Setsumatsusha has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:43, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Category:Independent shrines has been nominated for deletion

 

Category:Independent shrines has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:46, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Category:Shinto shrines by faith has been nominated for renaming

 

Category:Shinto shrines by faith has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:50, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Category:Pet shrines has been nominated for deletion

 

Category:Pet shrines has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 12:54, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Immanuelle. Thank you for your work on Gakusei. User:AngusWOOF, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

this could be a disambiguation later on

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|AngusWOOF}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 21:46, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nitta Shrine (May 12)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:22, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
 
Hello, Immanuelle! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:22, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Draft;Taki Shrine moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Draft;Taki Shrine, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 08:06, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Category:Regional Sōja has been nominated for merging

 

Category:Regional Sōja has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:43, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Category:Towers in religion has been nominated for renaming

 

Category:Towers in religion has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:45, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Category:Sanno faith has been nominated for renaming

 

Category:Sanno faith has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:47, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Category:Kōshin faith has been nominated for renaming

 

Category:Kōshin faith has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:48, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Category:Gion faith has been nominated for deletion

 

Category:Gion faith has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:54, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Category:Susanoo shrines has been nominated for renaming

 

Category:Susanoo shrines has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:57, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Category:Kamo shrines has been nominated for deletion

 

Category:Kamo shrines has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:59, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Category:Taisha has been nominated for renaming

 

Category:Taisha has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:06, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Page moves

Hello, Immanuelle,

It seems like you are doing quite a lot of article page moves, sometimes even moving an article to a different title and then deciding to move it back. Please be cautious with page moves and don't do them lightly. Don't make multiple page moves with the same article. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 06:58, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Hello, Immanuelle,
Well, one thing is clear, you don't read or pay attention to messages posted to your User talk page. PLEASE slow down with all of these endless page moves. I'm not confident that you know what you are doing and it would take a lot of work to revert these hundreds of page moves you've done. And by doing this, you end up creating hundreds of unnecessary page redirects. Please acknowledge that you have read this message and are considering my request. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 08:07, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
I had intended to slow down although I didn't respond to it. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 15:00, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Past Life (shinto)

  Hello, Immanuelle. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Past Life (shinto), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pneophyllum cetinaensis has been accepted

 
Pneophyllum cetinaensis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 01:56, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shinko-shiki (May 21)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:08, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
 
Hello, Immanuelle! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:08, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shukubo (May 21)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Scope creep was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
scope_creepTalk 11:20, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shukubo has been accepted

 
Shukubo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

scope_creepTalk 20:18, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Entries

You might be interested in Draft:Tokyo Industrial Exhibition and Draft:Hiroshi Abe? FloridaArmy (talk) 20:25, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

@FloridaArmy thank you. Both are a bit outside of my area of knowledge, but helpful. I moved Draft:Hiroshi Abe since it had the same name as a page in mainspace. I'm thinking of making a draft for Mokuyōkai (木曜会, The Thursday Association) which was an early left wing party founded by Senge Takatomi and you might be interested in that topic. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 20:37, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Actually I am a bit confused about the nature of that party so might hold off on it. Seems I may have been confusing organizations with similar names Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 21:26, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: H₂n̥gʷʰis has been accepted

 
H₂n̥gʷʰis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 19:20, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hikoyai has been accepted

 
Hikoyai, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

bradv 02:06, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oyama Shrine (Mount Tate) (May 29)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Raydann was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 09:23, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
 
Hello, Immanuelle! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 09:23, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abdication system has been accepted

 
Abdication system, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

bradv 15:56, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
I'm so happy this one was finally reviewed. a few really old submissions are being reviewed and it makes me happy. Hopefully Draft:Ikutsuhikone is next Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 16:20, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Category:Kamo no Chōmei has been nominated for deletion

 

Category:Kamo no Chōmei has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 20:22, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kamuyaimimi has been accepted

 
Kamuyaimimi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

bradv 17:02, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Huaguang Dadi has been accepted

 
Huaguang Dadi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

bradv 17:03, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Category:Ichinomiya categories has been nominated for merging

 

Category:Ichinomiya categories has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:44, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Category:Ichinomiya (Region) has been nominated for deletion

 

Category:Ichinomiya (Region) has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:56, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Symbiomycota has a new comment

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Symbiomycota. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 11:59, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
@Ozzie10aaaa I fixed the stated issue. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (talk to the cutest Wikipedian) 16:21, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Symbiomycota has been accepted

 
Symbiomycota, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 16:31, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Changing citizenship/ethnicity of people without sourcing or research

  As was explained to you at Talk:Métis#Are Métis really an indigenous people?, you don't seem to be familiar enough with Indigenous citizenship and ethnicity issues, or even to be taking the time to read the articles and sourcing on these topics, to be messing with these descriptions in bios, or starting articles that include any of these people or issues.[1],[2],[3] I'm seeing problems with this in a number of your edits. You need to become way more familiar with the field first. On Medicine wheel (symbol) for instance, you seemed to put in the first sources you found in a google search, that were full of misinformation.[4] Please do not do this. You also flagged the article for expert input, and then when experts gave input, you tried to overrule consensus. Please follow Wikipedia policies, and, if you are still determined to edit anything Indigenous, I strongly suggest asking questions at the Indigenous Wikiproject before proceeding. - CorbieVreccan 22:55, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amazing Cultivation Simulator (June 2)

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ () 12:51, 2 June 2023 (UTC)