User talk:S. M. Nazmus Shakib/Archives/Archive 1

Latest comment: 4 years ago by S. M. Nazmus Shakib in topic A barnstar for you!

Smnsbd1971, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Smnsbd1971! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Recent edits to Kung Fu Yoga

edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kung Fu Yoga, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 12:12, 26 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

March 2019

edit

  Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to B. Sandhya, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 21:26, 21 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Safa Kabir

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Safa Kabir, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. A loose necktie (talk) 09:09, 4 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Safa Kabir

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Safa Kabir, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Praxidicae (talk) 12:18, 4 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Reply

edit

Thanks for message, you seem to have created another article about the same person, which I've moved to Draft:Safa Kabir. I don't think it's ready for article space yet. The text is still close to the copyright source, and much of the article still lacks references, including the whole of the early life and career sections. None of the work she has done is linked to a Wikipedia article. Please try to improve the draft and I'll remove protection then Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:22, 4 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Also note that the deletion was for promotion as well as the copyright violation Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:24, 4 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Harun Rashid (actor) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harun Rashid (actor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harun Rashid (actor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~ Nahid Talk 14:35, 15 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Music F Fatafati

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Music F Fatafati, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 23:17, 16 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Baghini (2019 Film)) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Baghini (2019 Film).

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please be careful of leaving dab links in articles, as you did with Bangla in this article. As the article creator, you best know what you are talking about.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 TT me 14:44, 21 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Ok.Smnsbd1971 (talk) 14:53, 21 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

COI

edit

If you have a conflict of interest, you must declare it. If you work directly or indirectly for an organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. If you are paid directly or indirectly by the organisation you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:S. M. Nazmus Shakib. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=S. M. Nazmus Shakib/Archives|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.

Also read the following regarding writing an article

  • you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
  • you must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
  • there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
  • you must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. You must also reply to the COI request above

It's irrelevant whether she has a Bengali wikipedia page, the rules are different there, and it's no good you telling me to search for her, your article is supposed to explain why she is notable, but much of it is unsourced, or sourced to PR type pages, and there's nothing to show why she meets our notability criteria as linked above. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:56, 25 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of The Amar Sangbad

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Amar Sangbad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 22:35, 25 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of The Vorer Pata

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Vorer Pata requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 22:36, 25 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of The Manobkantha

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Manobkantha requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 22:36, 25 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of The Daily Peoples Time

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Daily Peoples Time requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 22:37, 25 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of The Daily Tribunal

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Daily Tribunal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 22:38, 25 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Our Time, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 26 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

April 2019

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from The Bonik Barta. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  Masum Ibn Musa  Conversation 03:47, 27 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

The problem of the page was solved yesterday. So I had removed the template yesterday. But, today you have reverted my edit and the grammatical problem again appears in the article. So I have removed and recorrrcted the article again.Smnsbd1971 (talk) 03:51, 27 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

A belated welcome!

edit
 
The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!  

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Smnsbd1971. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome!  Masum Ibn Musa  Conversation 03:48, 27 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thanks.Smnsbd1971 (talk) 04:00, 27 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of The Bonik Barta

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Bonik Barta requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Worldbruce (talk) 04:00, 27 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of The Our Time

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Our Time requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Worldbruce (talk) 04:26, 27 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Safa Kabir

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Safa Kabir requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Praxidicae (talk) 11:48, 27 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of The Manobkantha

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Manobkantha requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 06:33, 28 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of The Bangladesh Post for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Bangladesh Post is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bangladesh Post until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Worldbruce (talk) 12:59, 5 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of The Asian Age (Bangladesh) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Asian Age (Bangladesh) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Asian Age (Bangladesh) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Worldbruce (talk) 14:51, 5 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Orange TV (India)

edit
 

The article Orange TV (India) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability. Just another TV station. We cannot list them all, only the ones that assert notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alexf(talk) 09:54, 9 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Asian Radio

edit
 

The article Asian Radio has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The cited sources are a press release and an indiscriminate list of stations. Searches of the usual Google types, including by name in Bengali script, found only more press releases and passing mentions. Does not meet WP:NMEDIA.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Worldbruce (talk) 05:47, 15 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Pareshaan Parinda for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pareshaan Parinda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pareshaan Parinda until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GSS (talk|c|em) 12:21, 31 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of R Plus (TV channel)

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on R Plus (TV channel) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Alexf(talk) 14:38, 2 July 2019 (UTC) organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.Reply

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Alexf(talk) 14:40, 2 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Music F Fatafati

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Music F Fatafati requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Padavalam Kuttan Pilla  Talk  16:52, 2 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Music F Fatafati

edit
 

The article Music F Fatafati has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable sources, unnotable channel

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –eggofreason(talk · contribs) 18:53, 2 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Music F Fatafati

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Music F Fatafati requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 19:49, 2 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Mission Extreme moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Mission Extreme, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. This might need to happen around the date of the release of the film. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 16:33, 17 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of The Our Time

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Our Time requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. --Nahal(T) 10:00, 22 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of The Our Time for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Our Time is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Our Time until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Nahal(T) 10:21, 22 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Amaar Cinema

edit

Hello, S. M. Nazmus Shakib,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Red Phoenix and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Amaar Cinema, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion.The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now-visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

  1. Edit the page
  2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
  3. Click Publish Changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Red Phoenix}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Red Phoenix talk 13:05, 22 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Amaar Cinema

edit

Hello, S. M. Nazmus Shakib,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Red Phoenix and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Amaar Cinema should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amaar Cinema .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Red Phoenix}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Red Phoenix talk 13:58, 22 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Thanks for creating Nitai Roy Chowdhury.

User:Masum Ibn Musa while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thanks for the creating bengali related article.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Masum Ibn Musa}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

 Masum Ibn Musa  Conversation 13:56, 23 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Iqbal Ahmed (politician)

edit

Hi SMNaxzumus shakib, greetings. Additional sources needed as origianl refs provided are list. Independent, reliable sources needed for indept info about the subject required by notability guidelines. Pls do not remove sources. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:33, 25 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for message, CASSIOPEIA. From I do think from myneta.info it is clear that he is an Indian Politician.Ok, as you like, I will add sources about his nationality.--S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 13:39, 25 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
Hi S.M - do check out WP:GOLDENRULE as it summaries the notability requirement. Thanks. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 13:43, 25 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
I have checked. If any person elects in Provincial Assembly or Parliament, he will be notable. And myneta.info is a reliable source.--S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 13:48, 25 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
Since you remove the info, then pls provide independent reliable source that talk about the subject in length and in depth. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 03:30, 26 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Thanks for creating Nimai Bhattacharya.

User:Doomsdayer520 while reviewing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thank you for your new article on Nimai Bhattacharya. Note that other editors have called for improved references in the "Career" section. Per Wikipedia policy, this issue must be resolved as soon as possible.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 14:21, 26 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

July 2019

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Shirin Shila. Praxidicae (talk) 16:13, 28 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Praxidicae, thanks for message. I am new to English Wikipedia. As far as I know, those who have worked in multiple notable film in main roles are notable for Wikipedia Article. So I have removed the tag.--S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 16:42, 28 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Shirin Shila

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shirin Shila requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 00:33, 29 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Shirin Shila for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shirin Shila is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shirin Shila (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 13:15, 29 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Writer's Barnstar
Keep up the good work and try to get more references for your articles. Happy editing! Vinegarymass911 (talk) 22:33, 5 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
Thanks.--S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 09:45, 13 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Esha Yousuff

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Esha Yousuff, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a foreign language article that has essentially the same content as an article on another Wikimedia Foundation project. Please see Wikipedia:Translation to learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from foreign-language Wikipedias into English.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Railfan23 (talk) 06:48, 6 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

edit

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:S._M._Nazmus_Shakib reported by User:Mkativerata (Result: ). Thank you. Mkativerata (talk) 06:55, 17 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Jogesh Chandra Barman

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Jogesh Chandra Barman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. SHUBHAM SARITA (talk) 19:29, 20 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Deaths in 2019, etc.

edit

Hi. I appreciate that there may be an article "in progress" for a deceased person which would allow them to be placed in either the list above, or an archived month/year pre-dating that, if they have currently exceeded the agreed 30 days limit as a redlink. However, I would just like to ask that you create the article first, so that it becomes a bluelink before being entered in the appropriate position in the appropriate list. All post-30-day redlinks, as it stands, will be removed wherever and whenever they are discovered, regardless of any impending new edited articles. Thanks. Ref (chew)(do) 06:02, 21 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Refwordlee, thanks for your message. First I had created the article of Jogesh Chandra Barman and Maya Rani Paul. Then I had added on the list. Last night, the pages were deleted as mistake by an admin . After that the pages were restoted too.--S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 06:08, 21 August 2019 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for explaining that. I was not aware of those facts, and the same will apply in future probably, so I am afraid that any further apparent redlinks may again have to be re-added, as editors of the lists are very pro-active where redlinks past 30 days are concerned. I support all editing in good faith, so good luck with your future work. Ref (chew)(do) 06:23, 21 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Please note that when you add people to the Deaths in 2019 page, they should be in alphabetical order under each day. Thank you. --Marbe166 (talk) 16:15, 7 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Marbe166, thanks for your message on my talk page. It was a mistake.--S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 14:21, 7 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Thanks for creating Badal Bhattacharya.

User:Willbb234 while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Expand the abbreviations MLA and BJP into their full wording. Add (born 1944/45) after name

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willbb234}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willbb234Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 07:31, 24 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Nurul Alam Chowdhury

edit

  Hello! Your submission of Nurul Alam Chowdhury at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! JoJo Eumerus mobile (talk) 10:16, 27 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of R Plus (TV channel)

edit
 

The article R Plus (TV channel) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Another of the thousands of TV and cable channels. No indication of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alexf(talk) 20:41, 7 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Thanks for creating Pankaj Bandopadhyay.

User:Path slopu while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Please try to add more reliable information about the person in the article.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Path slopu}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

PATH SLOPU 09:09, 13 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Thanks for creating Gopal Seth.

User:Path slopu while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Please try to add more reliable information about the person in the article.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Path slopu}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

PATH SLOPU 09:12, 13 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Thanks for creating Choton Kisku.

User:Path slopu while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Please add some more reliable information about the person.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Path slopu}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

PATH SLOPU 09:24, 13 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Writer's Barnstar
This is for your selfless work in creating new articles in Wikipedia, I appreciate your efforts. Thank you. PATH SLOPU 09:28, 13 September 2019 (UTC)Reply
Thanks.--S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 09:45, 13 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Tamanna (Bangladeshi actress) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tamanna (Bangladeshi actress) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamanna (Bangladeshi actress) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Beasteggs (talk) 08:43, 15 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Salaam Aleikum dear S. M. Nazmus Shakib! Can you make an article about Bangladeshi movie Bikkhob starring Sunny Leone? Thank you! --95.55.106.2 (talk) 15:23, 21 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Non-free rationale for File:Alpha Bangladeshi Film.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Alpha Bangladeshi Film.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89(T·C) 05:15, 22 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Arman Alif for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arman Alif is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arman Alif until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Nahal(T) 12:49, 24 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Help

edit

Assalamualaikum, I am a new Wikipedian and I need your help. Can you review this article: Draft:Rohingya Language Academy and check is there anything you can add or need to remove.. if you have enough information about that you can also add and remove. If you think the article is suitable for review.. please let me know. Thank you! ArakaneseRohingya (talk) 21:30, 24 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Bengali reference

edit

If a reference is in Bengali, please use |language=bn or |language=bn-IN. See my edits on Mimi Majumder page. Feel free to contact. Regards. --Titodutta (talk) 21:18, 27 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Thanks for creating K. S. Masthan.

User:Path slopu while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Please add some more reliable information in the page.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Path slopu}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

PATH SLOPU 12:00, 28 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

WP:KITTENS

edit

Hi there, please look at the essay above, thanks. Willbb234Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 09:36, 1 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

I do hope that you have read this essay. Willbb234Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 09:32, 4 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Willbb234: I've read it.--S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 09:35, 4 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Good job. DreamSparrow Chat 16:22, 4 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
Thanks.--S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 03:36, 5 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Nurul Alam Chowdhury

edit

On 5 October 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Nurul Alam Chowdhury, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Nurul Alam Chowdhury was the youngest MP in the first parliament of Bangladesh? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nurul Alam Chowdhury. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Nurul Alam Chowdhury), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:03, 5 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Politicians

edit

Thank you for your contributions. you can refer to wP:NPOL criteria in your nomination statement while nominating articles for AfD as I did it here on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shyama Prasad Haldar. regards. --DBigXray 06:48, 6 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Thanks for creating Surya Rubel Das.

User:TomCat4680 while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

All sources need to be in English

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TomCat4680}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

TomCat4680 (talk) 11:02, 7 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Happy Dashain!

edit
Namaste, S. M. Nazmus Shakib, and Happy Dashain!  
WikiProject Nepal wishes you a wonderful Dashain filled with joy, love, and happiness.
Thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia, and have a great Dashain! Cheers.
Message sent by CAPTAIN MEDUSA on behalf of WikiProject Nepal.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 7 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject India

edit
 

 

Namaste, S. M. Nazmus Shakib. We would like to inform you about the recent changes to the WikiProject. As you may know, the old newsletter for WikiProject India ceased circulation in 2010. Now we have re-launched the newsletter in a new way. As a member, you are cordially invited to subscribe to the newsletter. Thank you.




Sent by Path slopu on behalf of WikiProject India. Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:56, 14 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miss Universe Bangladesh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thakurgaon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:21, 24 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Rafah Nanjeba Torsa for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rafah Nanjeba Torsa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rafah Nanjeba Torsa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Xain36 {talk} 18:02, 11 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, S. M. Nazmus Shakib

Thank you for creating Anjali Jathar.

User:Abishe, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating this article.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Abishe}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Abishe (talk) 16:03, 14 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Alishka Varde for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alishka Varde is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alishka Varde until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... discospinster talk 16:23, 21 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Narayan Rao Tarale

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Narayan Rao Tarale requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Interstellarity (talk) 18:05, 24 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Narayan Rao Tarale

edit

RHaworth has restored the Narayan Rao Tarale article for you. :) --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:05, 24 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Nimish Pilankar

edit
 

The article Nimish Pilankar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Clear case of WP:BLP1E. Absolutely no news of him other than reports of his death and reactions to that

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheOneWorkingAccount (talk) 18:10, 25 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

November 2019

edit

  Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Humayun Kabir (politician) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing →   Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Hi , S. M. Nazmus Shakib. Good Evening . recent a article i was added some reliable source, after that you removed in here, i don't know why ? even, you don't writing anything on edit summary. Please can explain what is the wrong in here ? Thanks for your creating this article. i hope you will include those reference on this article. Have a nice day. Thanks.-Nahal(T) 10:05, 27 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

NahalAhmed Sorry, for no edit summary. As the references you added on the article still available on biography portion from other reliable media. So, I removed those.--S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 12:35, 27 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Maina Tudu. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  Velella  Velella Talk   15:43, 27 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop removing maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Maina Tudu, without resolving the problem that the template refers to. This may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing.  Velella  Velella Talk   15:46, 27 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Edit warring

edit

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Maina Tudu; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.  Velella  Velella Talk   15:47, 27 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Velella I have mentioned twice about its removal on edit summary. You don't noticed. Yuva Puraskar is a notable award from Sahitya Akademy. I have also said, if you have confusion you may go for AfD. Its a stub article and all sources are reliable (one from govt website and other from Gateway LitFest website). And lot of sources available on Google about her award. I think you didn't notice and reverted my edit. Thanks--S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 15:52, 27 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
I noticed everything that you have written in this article and talk page. Removing maintenance templates without fixing the problem is inconsistent with Wikipedia protocol. The article does not have multiple, independent and reliable sources. I would also question the notability of Yuva Puraskar. You are edit warring. Please stop  Velella  Velella Talk   16:20, 27 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Autopatrolled granted

edit
 

Hi S. M. Nazmus Shakib, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! – Muboshgu (talk) 02:25, 28 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Muboshgu: Unfortunatately there appears to be possible claimed issues with a number of articles S. M. Nazmus Shakib has recently created. This situation to me seems messy with a number of CSD tags being improperly (certainly technically improperly) applied however CSD tags have repeatedly been removed including from valid CSD's rather than being contested. Under this apparent circumstance can I request you review this situation and consider whether to remove Wikipedia:Autopatrolled rights, at least for the present. Can I also ask you to check for cases where CSD tags have been improperly removed and send to AfD to draftify where necessary if appropriate. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 07:33, 16 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Djm-leighpark I have to say something. I agree that I removed CSD tags. If you did notice I said If needs go for an AfD? I am free to say where I removed CSD tags. Khan Joynul (a reknowed comedian of Bangladesh, acted in numerous films), Shyamal Kanti Biswas (vice-chancellor of a reknowed university in Bangladesh). Was it right to use A7 on that articles despite of having reliable sources on that article? I have seen articles like Jogesh Chandra Barman, Maya Rani Paul and Narayan Rao Tarale (state legislators, two of them deleted within 3 minutes) were deleted falling a7 despite of having reliable sources. I am totally tired of seeing stub article deletion those who passes WP:N. So, I removed them (these csds were used by reletively new users.) I am free to go for AfD.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 08:21, 16 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
Lets be very clear. As article creator you dont remove those CSD tags. You press that big blue button Contest that speedy deletion and leave a message on the talk page. And if an Admin then happens to delete it you can challenge them on it and if not satisfied challenge them at WP:DRV. But if you've got the autopatroller right and are doing that then it is a problem. That said some CSD tags have been technically incorrectly and incompetently placed on your articles recently which is very not helpful and which I will also pursue, but the deleting admin will pick these up (hopefully) so I would advise not to remove the CSD tag even in this circumstances. If you are not the article creator you are however allowed to remove the CSD tag. I remain concerned about you retaining autopatroller rights though. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 08:35, 16 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Djm-leighpark My blue button pressing were seemed nothing on previous reasons. But, is it good thing articles having top media sources of a country should fall under CSD? Even it was used it is good thing to delete? Even it declined by another user (not me), is it a good thing to provide CSD again? Then I remove CSD on that article as it was declined. After that he put again and it was deleted though having 5 sources from top media of Bangladesh about his notability. If you think I have lack knowledge of policies, you may think as it is your birth right to think and explain. As they were relatively new users (having around 200 edits) so it seemed to me these were done by their mistake. If these were mistake by me, I am sorry as these were done by my mistake.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 08:52, 16 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
You are missing the point. Stop removing CSD tags from articles you have created yourself. It is a blatant violation of wikipedia policy. See WP:SPEEDY. These are not by mistake. You have created articles, such as Shyamal Kanti Biswas and Khan Joynul, other users placed CSD tags, and then you proceeded, as article creator, to remove those CSD tags, in violation of WP:SPEEDY. I don't see how these are mistakes. Also, please stop violating the policy and leave the CSD tags on the articles until another editor or admin can review, as per WP:SPEEDY. Dr42 (talk) 01:15, 20 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
Per the above discussion and the AN/I thread, I've undone what I did and took away autopatrolled permission. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:39, 20 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Shyamal Kanti Biswas

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shyamal Kanti Biswas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dr42 (talk) 15:49, 14 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Khan Joynul

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Khan Joynul requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This is a article about a unnotable or small artist

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kitaab Ka Kida (talk) 15:39, 15 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Please do not remove the Speedy deletion tag by yourself it will be remove by an administrator of Wikipedia Kitaab Ka Kida (talk) 15:40, 15 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Khan Joynul

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Khan Joynul requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

already deleted earlier, not a notable article

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kitaab Ka Kida (talk) 16:45, 15 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Please do not remove the Speedy deletion tag by yourself it will be remove by an administrator of Wikipedia Kitaab Ka Kida (talk) 16:46, 15 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

If you have confidence then please don't remove the speedy deletion tag. Kitaab Ka Kida (talk) 16:51, 15 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Adhora Khan for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adhora Khan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adhora Khan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~Moheen (keep talking) 17:43, 15 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Shyamal Kanti Biswas

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shyamal Kanti Biswas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dr42 (talk) 00:50, 20 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Removal of CSD tag on Shyamal Kanti Biswas

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Dr42 (talk) 01:05, 20 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Removal of CSD on Khan Joynul

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Dr42 (talk) 01:06, 20 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

I've reviewed several other articles that other editors have tagged for CSD and you have removed those yourself as well. You've admitted it above. Please, review the following: "Stop removing CSD tags from articles you have created yourself. It is a blatant violation of wikipedia policy. See WP:SPEEDY. These are not by mistake. You have created articles, such as Shyamal Kanti Biswas and Khan Joynul, other users placed CSD tags, and then you proceeded, as article creator, to remove those CSD tags, in violation of WP:SPEEDY. I don't see how these are mistakes. Also, please stop violating the policy and leave the CSD tags on the articles until another editor or admin can review, as per WP:SPEEDY." Dr42 (talk) 01:24, 20 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Adhora Khan

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Adhora Khan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dr42 (talk) 01:10, 20 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Nimish Pilankar

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nimish Pilankar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dr42 (talk) 01:19, 20 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Noticeboard notification

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User is consistently removing CSD tags on articles created by the user. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 02:32, 20 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Pramod Khanna

edit
 

The article Pramod Khanna has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Simply put under WP:N and applicable here, Khanna fails to meet the requirement as he "has [failed to] receive significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject[.]" Therefore, "it is presumed to [not] be suitable for a stand-alone article."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dr42 (talk) 04:14, 20 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Pramod Khanna for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pramod Khanna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pramod Khanna until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dr42 (talk) 04:15, 20 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Canvassing at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adhora Khan

edit

  It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. Dr42 (talk) 08:39, 20 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Dr42 please stop your false allegation.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 08:47, 20 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Unfortunately it's not false. You stated verbatim

"Hoary please said to the user not to harass me. Today he put 4 CSDs (3 of them declined and another is Nimish Pilankar and 1 AfD (Pramod Khanna) on my articles. Even, alleged me with false allegations on WP:ANI.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 08:17, 20 December 2019 (UTC)"

That is canvassing and I am respectfully requesting that your messages reflect a neutral point of view or engage in cross-posting, per the warning above. That is all. Dr42 (talk) 08:51, 20 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

What is you doing, I have noticed on WP:ANI. That is why I have said.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 08:56, 20 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Apologies

edit

I believe I may have alleged you were casting allegations behind User:RHaworth's back. I am now minded looking how that works RHaworth may have received messaging (or there may or may not have been red-link issue). In all events I am sufficiently concerned my "behind the back" accusation may have been untrue in which case it was WP:UNCIVIL and I apologise. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 08:46, 24 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Djm-leighpark Its ok. You need not to say apologies.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 08:53, 24 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Shah Niamatullah

edit

I am concerned your article Shah Niamatullah may be WP:CFORK with Shah Nimatullah Wali. If not disambiguation hatnote would probably be useful. In all events can you comment at Talk:Shah Niamatullah. If the situation remains unresolved I may at some point escalate, possibly via WP:AfD (AfD escalation would not be ideal but merge suggestions are likely not useful either]].Djm-leighpark (talk) 08:54, 24 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Djm-leighpark I've replied.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 09:06, 24 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Good luck

edit

Recently deceased persons

edit

Standard discretionary alert(blp)

edit

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Article talk pages

edit

You appear to be creating quite a number of articles, yet while you have under previous scrutiny you wished autopatroller rights to reduce work for others, you seem typically not to create a talk page for articles or attempt to identify and notify appropriate WikiProjects thereupon and leave that for others. I have found no specific policy but it would seem pragmatically important for living and recently decreased persons that as a minimum the talk page is templated to Template:WikiProject Biography (to alert the project) and Template:BLP/Template:BLP others is applied (my personally preferred way of doing this is via setting blp=yes or blpo=yes to Template:WPBS). I personally believe there is onus on the creator to do this unless going via WP:AFC. Failure to do these things will likely lead to problems sooner or later perhaps especially in my opinion for WP:BDP. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 20:34, 26 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Manul

edit

Why did you revert the necessary changes made by me? Aakashgupta1198 (talk) 13:55, 30 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Aakashgupta1198 you have added unreferenced info. Even, you have removed referenced info too. So, your edits were reverted. And please read about WP:Vandalism. Thanks.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 14:14, 30 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Respected Mr. Shakib, Kindly check the references, and if you find them relevant then let me know. I know, I missed adding the references but I can assure you the information is strictly verified and true to it's existance. What I did was change the year to 1998 from 1998/1999 the references were illogical and didn't had anything to do with the respective information. Moreover I only increased the information, rather reducing it. Aakashgupta1198 (talk) 15:53, 30 December 2019 (UTC)Aakashgupta1198Reply

Aakashgupta1198 you have added reference from a vanity website. I have given the reference of TOI before about her age. Please see WP:ICTF and add info from those sources. The TOI info said she was 20 in 2019. That means she was born in 1998 or 1999. And don't gave references from vanity websites in Wikipedia. Thanks.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 16:26, 30 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Happy New Year, S. M. Nazmus Shakib!

edit

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

I'll keep in mind. Thanks for your guidance. Wish you a very happy New Year. May god bless you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aakashgupta1198 (talkcontribs) 16:18, 2 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Muhammad Ishaq

edit

Hi S. M. Nazmus Shakib. Sorry about the redirect on that page, didn't read properly. I wonder if it is worth setting up a proper disambiguation page for this name (like Tom Jones). Apart from your two articles, there are several other WP articles that have derivatives of this name (e.g. Muhammad Ishaq Madni, Mohammad Ishaq Aloko), as well as close spellings that would go into a See Also on a dis page (like Mohammed Ishaq). What do you think? Britishfinance (talk) 13:57, 8 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Britishfinance Its ok. We are all human and to err is human. I think a disambiguation page should be created on Muhammad Ishaq as we can see the presence of Muhammad Ishaqs.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 14:05, 8 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Sources

edit

Hi there, thank you for creating quality articles but I need to alert you that you have been mostly using Bengali and Hindi sources which are quite difficult for English speakers to understand. I too was not able to understand the meaning if the sources when I was reviewing your articles. There is no hard and fast rule to only use English sources but this is the English Wikipedia, so I kindly request you to add at least two sources in English. You can add the foreign language sources as you do. Regards. Abishe (talk) 12:16, 9 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Abishe: I will try.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 14:35, 9 January 2020 (UTC)Reply


A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Writer's Barnstar
Bravo! Truly inspired by your work. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 12:52, 9 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
Thanks.S. M. Nazmus Shakib (talk) 14:36, 9 January 2020 (UTC)Reply