Image copyright problem with Image:Cyprus_kykkos_monastery.jpgedit
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks for uploading Image:Cyprus_kykkos_monastery.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The problem is that the images were uploaded for "non-commercial use only" or "used with permission" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19. This means they are not free enough to be used on wikipedia. If you own the copyright on the images there are a number of alturnative lisences you could upload them under which would not get them deleted.Geni 18:52, 3 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 17 years ago6 comments1 person in discussion
Hello, Jhabib! I see that you have expressed an interest in being adopted by an experienced editor. I accept your request, being an experienced editor myself. Whether you want to learn about wiki markup, find something to do, or just talk to somebody, I'm the one you can talk to - just leave a message on my talk page. Good luck with Wikipedia! --The Great Llama(now on editor review!) 23:39, 28 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
You've done a good job on your contribs, especially with the articles you created. Some suggestions, though:
For the headers, type ==(header)==, instead of =(header)=. That format should not be used very often (one of the exceptions being on the help desk), as it makes the text the same size as the article name, which can be confusing.
Also, try using the neutral point of view. In other words, try to avoid using words like "we", "unfortunately", "ironically", etc.
Lastly, would you please explain what you meant by "content list" on my talk page?
I will help with the headers and NPOV. Other than those points (these mistakes are expected by new users), you've been doing a very good job. --The Great Llama(now on editor review!) 14:35, 29 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
There are a lot of ways to contribute to Wikipedia other than editing articles, some of those being suggesting changes to articles via talk pages, articles for deletion, requests for adminship, vandalfighting, and creating pages in other namespaces (such as portals or a userpage). Of course, you don't have do just start doing all these things at the same time; I suggest you create a userpage and continue editing articles for a little while, then start vandalfighting, and when you have a month or two more experience, AfD and RfA. After that, you'll have a lot of experience and maybe participate in WikiProjects, or creating a portal.
I noticed that you didn't get a welcome yet, so here you go!
Hello Jhabib! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! The Great Llama(now on editor review!) 15:46, 29 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
Sorry for the delay. As for the vandalfighting, I suggest putting popups in your monobook (which I notice you already did) and do some recent changes patrolling using the popups. To patroll, click "recent changes" in the "navigation" bar on the left side of the screen (or just click Special:Recentchanges), hiding logged-in users, and clicking the diffs until you find a vandalized article. When you do, hover your cursor over it, then click "rv" on the popup. This will revert the changes. Afterwards, check the page history, find the vandal, and leave a message saying {{subst:test-n|vandalized article}} --~~~~. If there is already a warning on their talk page, use {{test2-n|article}}, if there are two, use {{test3-n|article}}, etc. If there are four warnings, however, follow the instructions atAIV to report the user, and the user will probably be blocked. This may seem confusing, so feel free to ask me any questions you have. Would you specify to me what you mean by "flagging" pages, though? --The Great Llama(now on editor review!) 20:03, 29 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 17 years ago6 comments1 person in discussion
Yes, that's vandalism, since the author keeps removing the db tags. Feel free to revert it. Assuming you're using popups, clicking "rv" will automatically leave an edit summary, but you'll have to warn the user (Salmonish) with {{test}}. --The Great Llama(now on editor review!) 21:46, 29 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
Oops, you seem to have gotten a little confused! Warnings should go on the vandal's user talk page, not the talk page for the article itself. The correct link is User talk:Salmonish. This is a perfectly understandable mistake. Also, something I neglected to mention: put {{subst:test}} on the user talk page, not just {{test}}. This, instead of keeping the {{test}} on the editing page, makes it so that the "Thank you for experimenting..." goes on the editing screen. --The Great Llama(now on editor review!) 22:01, 29 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
Just keep reverting it and warning them. If they blank their own talk page, however, revert and put {{subst:blankown}} on their page. --The Great Llama(now on editor review!) 22:09, 29 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
The article was actually created and deleted three times, deleted by Pgk, Vary, and Petros471. Putting the db tag will usually get an admin's attention within a few minutes. --The Great Llama(now on editor review!) 22:30, 29 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
Well, there's really no way to be 100% sure if an edit is vandalism, but it's usually relatively obvious. I've made about five mistakes in reverting myself. --The Great Llama(now on editor review!) 22:57, 29 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Would you please rephrase that? Specifically, what do you mean by "Not putting any message on the first page"? --The Great Llama(now on editor review!) 21:37, 30 October 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 17 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion
That's a good start on the article - I'll have a look at improving it if that's ok with you? --Mcginnly | Natter 14:07, 9 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
I found this site [1] that looks like the source for your article - it's important in wikipedia that we don't infringe anyones copyright - so cutting and pasting isn't really done - the article needs to be thoroughly reworded - no problem, I'm nearly there. By the way, you might be interested in joining the Architecture wikiproject there's a load of like minded people over there trying to improve architecture articles - and photographers and editors are always welcome. Take care. --Mcginnly | Natter 01:06, 10 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
Just go to the project and add your name to the list of participants at the bottom of the list. --Mcginnly | Natter 10:53, 10 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks for applying to use VandalSniper. Unfortunately, I have the burden of telling you "sorry, not quite yet". You haven't been added to the approved users list yet because we would like to wait and see more edits from you first (but you are more than welcome to continue asking questions about the tool on the talk page, and I will try to help you get it working if I can). Although the requirements to use VS are not set in stone, VandalSniper is a fast, fully-featured reversion tool with the potential for a sizable amount of edits in a short period of time, so this decision must sometimes be meticulous; I hope you understand. Your interest in VS is greatly appreciated, and you are invited to apply after you've made a few more edits. The reason you have not been approved yet says nothing about your value as a contributor – only that we'd like to see a little more of your work on Wikipedia before giving access to the tool.
Again, thanks so much for your interest. If you have any questions or concerns about this decision, feel free to contact me and I will be more than happy to discuss it with you. Again, thank you for helping "keep Wikipedia clean". Good luck, and happy editing! -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 17:32, 10 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
Articles related to architecture over the past two weeks are listed automatically by AlexNewArtBot.
This list was generated from these rules. Questions and feedback are always welcome! The search is being run daily with the most recent ~14 days of results. Note: Some articles may not be relevant to this project.
The Cyprus stub template is purposed for changing the link from Cyprus link to Geography of Cyprus and from Image of Flag of Cyprus to Image for map. Can you help me please to not achieved that? KRBN 02:10 10 January 2007 (UTC)
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Sure! Sorry for the late reply,I've been busy lately, but I'll check my messages daily and hopefully answer them within a day or two. — Malcolm (talk) 20:43, 12 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
A tag has been placed on Saint jacob of hamatoura requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ironholds (talk) 20:00, 26 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Raziman T V (talk) 13:58, 14 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
You might be better off starting this article in userspace... --Dweller (talk) 13:59, 14 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
I've restored the article in your userspace at User:Jhabib/Integration Marketing & Communications. This way, you'll have more time to develop it before someone tries to get it deleted. Concentrate on demonstrating the company's notability (WP:CORP) before moving it back into the encyclopedia. --Dweller (talk) 14:25, 14 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
A tag has been placed on Integration Marketing & Communications, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 19:30, 27 December 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi Jhabib. Although it may have not been your intent, your article, "Integration Marketing & Communications", read like an advertisement. Here on Wikipedia, we have a policy in which advertising/spam is speedy deleted per deletion criterion G11. Please note that articles for deletion are judged on their own merit, not in comparison to other articles (See WP:OTHERSTUFF). You are certainly welcome to resubmit the article, but please revise the text so that it complies with the policies and guidelines noted at WP:ADS and WP:MOS; otherwise, you run the risk of having the article deleted again. FASTILYsock(TALK) 07:59, 16 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IMC Logo.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --MaenK.A.Talk 14:21, 30 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
You need to speed up a little on moving this back into mainspace - userspace is not intended for long term storing of material put there specifically because it would be deleted from mainspace. Do you think the article now demonstrates notability, ie it passes WP:CORP? --Dweller (talk) 15:53, 20 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Chuunen Baka (talk) 12:36, 28 April 2010 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This has been userfied since 2009. I think three years is sufficient for you to work on it. If you have evidence of notability, please present it swiftly, or I will need to nominate it for deletion, as Wikipedia is not a free webhost. --Dweller (talk) 12:19, 3 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks for uploading File:Kykkos2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:41, 13 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion,
a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks for uploading File:Kykkos3.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:16, 21 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Market contact audit requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://brandexperience-group.com/marketingEffectiveness.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. StarMississippi 22:19, 21 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
