User talk:WisDom-UK/Archive 1
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Welcome
Hello there Sdrawkcab, welcome to Wikipedia! I see you've been doing some good work on List of country name etymologies. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you ever need editing help visit Wikipedia:How does one edit a page or how to format them visit our manual of style. Experiment at Wikipedia:Sandbox. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Wikipedia:Naming conventions. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help, add a question to the Help desk or leave a note on my talk page. Happy editing! moink 18:48, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)
Similar articles
Hi, your recent article on Similarities between the Bible and the Qur'an seems the same as the (intent of the) article The Bible in Islam. Could you please explain. Thanks. IZAK 21:52, 3 Aug 2004 (UTC)
Fugue
You can add something about the 'Lost Highway' as long as you don't spoil the movie like in your original entry. -- Gyan 20:39, 4 Aug 2004 (UTC)-
Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
- Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
- Multi-Licensing Guide
- Free the Rambot Articles Project
To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:
- Option 1
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
OR
- Option 2
- I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:
- {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}
Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}" with "{{MultiLicensePD}}". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)
Dropping you a line
and thanking you on polishing the Bugojno article. Regards from Bosnia, Muhamedmesic 02:38, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Map of Mauritania
Thanks for liking my work :) If you really like it, you should check our Morwen's maps, she was the very major major inspiration for my work. I was planning on working alphabetically, having done only A (and tiny countries like Djibouti) but I'll see what I can do and push Mauritania up to the top of the list. :) --Golbez 21:03, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)
- However, I could use some help. How familiar are you with Mauritania? I have conflicting maps on the shape of Dakhlet Nouadhibou. Compare this map from the CIA (which I usually consider by far the best source) with this map from Magellan. All non-CIA maps I find use the same shape as in the Magellan one, that shows Dakhlet Nouadhibou as having a "panhandle" that goes east above Inchiri. Do you know which of these is more accurate? --Golbez 21:36, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)
- Never mind; mauritania.fr (As best an authoritative source as I can find) has the Magellan map. So I whipped it up, went faster than most maps due to all the straight lines. :) How does it look? --Golbez 05:23, Feb 20, 2005 (UTC)
You're welcome
I'm glad you like it. :) As I said, I'm working on all the nations, more or less in order, and I'm making stubs for the regions as I get to them, so don't worry about that. I just figured, it was about time we had subdivision maps of every country, and then work from there. Have any other particular requests you'd like me to do next? :) (Oh, and by the way, if you sign your posts with ~~~~, it links your name, making it easier to get to your page) --Golbez 20:50, Feb 21, 2005 (UTC)
Faroe islands stubs
Hi Sdrawkcab, could you please explain why you split Hestur, Hestur off from Hestur? I really can't see why that tiny island and its tiny village should not be covered together. Also, the comma notation for municipalities ("New York, New York") is appropriate only for places where it is in common usage (which is, to my knowledge, in the United States only). Best regards, Kosebamse 10:27, 28 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Djibouti districts, Mongolia aymags, uppercase
hi Sdrawkcab, do you think we can make them uppercase to harmonize the titles of subnational entities? thanks for a comment at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject Subnational entities Tobias Conradi 13:07, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Image deletion warning | Image:TECH-YellowPapuaMan.bmp has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. If you feel that this image should not be deleted, please go there to voice your opinion. |
Maps
No problem, always like to be appreciated. :) What in particular do you want maps of? --Golbez 03:24, August 12, 2005 (UTC)
- LOL, good choices, Suriname and Guyana. Guess what?
- I already made them :D I uploaded them to Commons back in early July, I just hadn't gotten around to adding them to articles yet, got sidetracked with other issues. I'll do that now. ;) As for French Guiana, I had been avoiding "second level divisions" (which the arrondisements are) and especially third level ones (districts), but I'll look into it. :) --Golbez 18:37, August 12, 2005 (UTC)
- I put the Suriname maps up, I put the main Guyana map up but since there are only three articles, and one is a bit.. weird, I decided to wait until some stubs had been made. You can insert them easily if you want :) --Golbez 18:45, August 12, 2005 (UTC)
- There's still a few countries without maps, I keep a list of them at home. --Golbez 18:46, August 15, 2005 (UTC)
Pictures removed from "History of Suriname"
I have just noticed that you seem to have removed three interesting photographs I had posted on this page on 15 August 2005. Please tell me why you removed them and what has happened to them? Were they, perhaps, moved somewhere else? I look forward to hearing from you. John Hill John Hill 07:03, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
Removed pictures from "History of Suriname" and "History of French Guyana"
Thank you for replying to my query above so promptly. I take your point about the clutter on the page. I will perhaps move one or two of them to the page on "Maroons." Now, I have also noticed that you removed a photo of the Condemned Mens' block in the History of French Guyana page. I am thinking of posting this photo once again but adding to the caption the fact that the guillotine used to be positioned directly in front of this building (just about where the photographer was standing when he took the photo). I think this should increase the interest of the photo and, as photos of the prisons there seem to be very rare, I think it would be justified to have two on the same page (or perhaps I should move one to another page?). Would you agree to this? If you think they are too large I could easily shrink them. Please let me know if you have any thoughts on how best to do it.
Image Tagging for Image:DesiBouterse.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:DesiBouterse.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as {{db-unksource}}.
If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 06:16, 4 March 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging Image:Guianaprotest.jpg
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading Image:Guianaprotest.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.
If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam (T/C) 16:57, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
Cinema of Ireland
None of the films were Irish productions. American or British films partly shot in Ireland with some Irish actors wouldn't really be included as Irish films. The Quiet Man, Barry Lyndon, The Devil's Own, Far and Away, etc are not considered to be Irish films, but foreign films partly shot in Ireland. Waking Ned (Devine) was not even filmed in Ireland, but on the Isle of Man. In the same way, films like V for Vendetta, The Avengers or 101 Dalmations wouldn't be considered British films, despite being set and filmed in Britain with British actors, they are still American films. Hope this clears it up. JW 11:58, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
AfD nomination of List of country nicknames
List of country nicknames, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that List of country nicknames satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of country nicknames and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of List of country nicknames during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Iain99 13:00, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
The article List of songs about Birmingham has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- A list with only two songs doesn't really qualify for its own article, and is better dealt with in its parent, List of songs about cities. If more examples come to light, fine, but so far this list is unnecessary.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rodhullandemu 23:51, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
Hello Sdrawkcab
I must commend you for your contributions on Geography of Nigeria article.You did a perfect job in adding extreme points on that article.That article has for long been stagnant and your contribution has made it larger,welldone,cheers Earlymen (talk) 03:17,22 December 2010 (UTC)
License tagging for File:EmailToTheUniverseCover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:EmailToTheUniverseCover.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:05, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:WilhelmReichCover2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:WilhelmReichCover2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:10, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:WilhelmReichCover3.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:WilhelmReichCover3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:10, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for File:Bobbk.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Bobbk.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 08:27, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for File:Ishtar2.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ishtar2.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 08:27, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for File:CosmicTrigger1v2.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:CosmicTrigger1v2.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 08:32, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for File:CosmicTrigger1v4.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:CosmicTrigger1v4.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 08:32, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for File:CosmicTrigger1v5.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:CosmicTrigger1v5.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 08:33, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for File:CosmicTrigger2v2.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:CosmicTrigger2v2.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 08:33, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for File:CosmicTrigger2v3.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:CosmicTrigger2v3.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 08:33, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for File:CosmicTrigger3v2.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:CosmicTrigger3v2.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 08:34, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
- As a "p.s." galleries of non-free images are not allowed on Wikipedia - I did add a fair use rationale for the ones that are used in the infoboxes. Skier Dude (talk) 08:35, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Autopatrolled
Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:
- This permission does not give you any special status or authority
- Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
- You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
- If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
- If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 02:39, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 16:35, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Thank you
The Modest Barnstar | ||
Thanks for your recent contributions! 129.49.72.78 (talk) 16:57, 22 February 2011 (UTC) |
date linking
Hi, thanks for your editing, especially on Birmingham. Please note that years and dates are per not linked unless there's a particular reason to do so. Cheers.[1] Tony (talk) 00:59, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sparkbrook, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Somali (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of songs about Birmingham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Fall (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:CosmicTrigger1v2.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:CosmicTrigger1v2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:11, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:CosmicTrigger1v3.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:CosmicTrigger1v3.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:12, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:CosmicTrigger1v4.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:CosmicTrigger1v4.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:12, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:CosmicTrigger1v5.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:CosmicTrigger1v5.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:12, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
Article notability notification
Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote, Turbulence (2011 film), has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "Turbulence (2011 film)" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 01:40, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Geography of Paraguay (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Itaipu
- South Beddington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Wallington
- Woodcote Green (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Wallington
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Representative of Montserrat, London, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kings Cross (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Bellovaci (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Britain
- Embassy of Guinea, London (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Kilburn
- Veneti (Gaul) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Britain
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:06, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
Ways to improve Embassy of Sweden, London
Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Sdrawkcab, thanks for creating Embassy of Sweden, London!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. 2
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 21:52, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
Ways to improve High Commission of Kenya, London
Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Sdrawkcab, thanks for creating High Commission of Kenya, London!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. 2
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 23:36, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Embassy of Cuba in London 2.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Embassy of Cuba in London 2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:04, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:High Commission of Rwanda in London 2.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:High Commission of Rwanda in London 2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:00, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Embassy of Kazakhstan, London (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Pall Mall
- Embassy of Kosovo, London (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Pall Mall
- Embassy of Mexico, London (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Zapatista
- Embassy of Qatar, London (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Victorian
- Embassy of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, London (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Kings Cross
- High Commission of New Zealand, London (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Haymarket
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 2 November 2013 (UTC)
The article High Commission of Mozambique, London has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non claim of notability. No evidence of in depth independent coverage. No independent references
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:15, 10 November 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of High Commission of Mozambique, London for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article High Commission of Mozambique, London is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/High Commission of Mozambique, London until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:27, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited High Commission of Canada to the United Kingdom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pall Mall (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
November 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Henry Alfred Pegram may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- *"The Bather" friezes at Buckingham Gate no. 20, [[Westminster]], London (now the [[High Commission of Swaziland, London|High Commission of Swaziland]].<ref name="lawson"/>
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:55, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Reginald Blomfield may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:56, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
A page you started (High Commission of Grenada, London) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating High Commission of Grenada, London, Sdrawkcab!
Wikipedia editor Anonposeidon just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Nice page on 'High Commission of Grenada, London' remember to keep adding details when possible. (Anonposeidon (talk) 22:31, 30 November 2013 (UTC))
To reply, leave a comment on Anonposeidon's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
A page you started (Embassy of Finland, London) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Embassy of Finland, London, Sdrawkcab!
Wikipedia editor Anonposeidon just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Nice article on 'Embassy of Finland, London'. Thanks for your contribution! Remember to add all information that you know. (Anonposeidon (talk) 23:18, 30 November 2013 (UTC))
To reply, leave a comment on Anonposeidon's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Disambiguation link notification for December 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Embassy of Guatemala, London, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chelsea (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:42, 1 December 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedian in community notice
Dear WisDom-UK/Archive 1
As a Wikipedian interested in African subjects and specifically Uganda, we thought you might be interested in the following opportunity.
WikiAfrica is looking for a Wikipedian in Community from Uganda to play a pivotal role in its Kumusha Takes Wiki project. This might be a position that you would consider. Or it could be the perfect opportunity for someone you know from this country, please spread the word! For more details, please look at this page: http://www.wikiafrica.net/call_for_wir_en/
If you have any questions about the above, please contact isla on isla [at] wikiafrica [dot] net : Isla Haddow (talk)
File permission problem with File:Embassy of Uruguay in London 2.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Embassy of Uruguay in London 2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.
If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:38, 2 December 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Embassy of Austria, London (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to America
- Embassy of Ecuador, London (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Wimbledon
- Embassy of Italy, London (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Farringdon
- Embassy of Thailand, London (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Brompton
- High Commission of Malaysia, London (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Malaya
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 8 December 2013 (UTC)
A page you started (High Commission of Sri Lanka, London) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating High Commission of Sri Lanka, London, Sdrawkcab!
Wikipedia editor ObiWanKenobi11 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Thank you for this wonderful contribution!
To reply, leave a comment on ObiWanKenobi11's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
A barnstar for you!
The Writer's Barnstar | |
Thank you for your contributions, including your articles regarding diplomatic missions in the United Kingdom. ObiWanKenobi11 (talk) 19:45, 8 December 2013 (UTC) |
Thanks, I'm almost finished now, just need to source a few pics for a few embassies you're not allowed to photograph Sdrawkcab (talk) 19:48, 8 December 2013 (UTC)sdrawkcab
December 2013
Hello, I'm Stuartyeates. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to High Commission of Mozambique, London because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! The AfD concluded that this should be a redirect. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:07, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Embassy of the Democratic Republic of the Congo, London may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- [[Category:Buildings and structures in the City of
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:16, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Embassy of Croatia, London may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- of_Croatia_in_London_2.jpg|Plaque outside the embassy in [[Croatian language|Croatian]] and [{English language|English]]
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:35, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Apostolic Nunciature to Great Britain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Wimbledon
- Embassy of Afghanistan, London (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Prince's Gate
- Embassy of Brazil, London (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Vere Street
- Embassy of France, London (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Haymarket
- Embassy of Greece, London (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Kurdish
- Embassy of Guinea, London (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Kilburn
- Embassy of Russia, London (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Harrington House
- High Commission of the Maldives, London (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Divehi
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
The article Embassy of Afghanistan, London has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non claim of notability. No independent references in with depth coverage. Nothing obvious in google with in depth coverage.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:30, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
The article High Commission of Brunei, London has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Non claim of notability. No independent references in with depth coverage. Nothing obvious in google with in depth coverage.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:31, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
The article Embassy of Bahrain, London has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No claim of notability. No independent references in with depth coverage. Nothing obvious in google with in depth coverage.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:32, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
The article High Commission of Bangladesh, London has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No claim of notability. No independent references in with depth coverage. Nothing obvious in google with in depth coverage.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:33, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
The article High Commission of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, London has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No claim of notability. No independent references in with depth coverage. Nothing obvious in google with in depth coverage.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:33, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
The article Embassy of Uruguay, London has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No claim of notability. No independent references in with depth coverage. Nothing obvious in google with in depth coverage.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 06:34, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
A couple of points
Having seen your listing on DRV, and the prods listed about (and your response to those), there are perhaps a couple of things I can point out.
(i) Prod is for uncontroversial deletions, so yes they are one mans opinion generally in the first instance. The proper process is for you to simply remove the template now, no need for you to wait a few days. No one else is likely to come along in that forum (the talk page) an opine about the deletion if the prod template is still there, they'll either think "I agree so I do nothing and it gets deleted", or they'll think it doesn't warrant deletion and remove the template. If someone else still believes they should be deleted, that person would then raise a fuller discussion so a rough consensus of editors can be sought - someone could do this regardless of how many days the prod template is left on the article and the length of time the prod template was in place will make no difference to the final outcome of that fuller discussion. (ii) Be careful of doing things like this, which could be seen to be a violation of WP:CANVAS. I'm sure you'd be unhappy if other participants in the discussion called on their "friends" to support their point of view. --86.5.93.42 (talk) 22:03, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Embassy of Thailand, London (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Prince's Gate
- Embassy of Turkmenistan, London (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Turkmen
- High Commission of Sri Lanka, London (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Sinhala
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Embassy of Afghanistan, London for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Embassy of Afghanistan, London is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of Afghanistan, London until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:22, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
- Hi. Some people are busy to save the article. If you can help, please do. Regards,Jeff5102 (talk) 13:27, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Embassy of Uruguay, London for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Embassy of Uruguay, London is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of Uruguay, London until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 03:05, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:EmailToTheUniverseCover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:EmailToTheUniverseCover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:36, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Russell Hill, Croydon
- added a link pointing to Purley
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bow Common, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Booth. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
A page you started (Cannon Hill, Merton) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Cannon Hill, Merton, Sdrawkcab!
Wikipedia editor Asdklf; just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
You may want to use the template"
" on these sorts of articles.
To reply, leave a comment on Asdklf;'s talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Disambiguation link notification for September 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Mill Meads
- added a link pointing to Abbey Mills
- Plashet
- added a link pointing to Upton Park
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Northolt, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IRA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on High Commission of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, London, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:48, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
London Borough templates: tube and rail stations discussion open
Hello and a Happy Christmas. Thanks for your recent contributions, improving London's coverage. I would like to invite you to: Category talk:London borough templates.- Adam37 Talk 15:11, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bell Green, London, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Booth. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:43, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:CosmicTrigger1new.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:CosmicTrigger1new.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hatton Garden, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chartreuse and Kirby House. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Sdrawkcab. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page.
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Sdrawkcab. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:Made in Dagenham Civic Centre Scene Screenshot.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Made in Dagenham Civic Centre Scene Screenshot.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}
below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason>
with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:11, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Chinatown, London (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Charles II and Elizabeth Stuart
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
London Street names
Hi. Couple of editing tips:
- When adding multiple sources to the same book, consider using
{{sfn}}
and the "ref=harv" template in sources. See this edit to Street names of Marylebone for how it's done. - I don't think there's much point in adding that the origin of some name is "unknown" - people are likely to be somewhat crestfallen looking for information on here, only to be told "we don't know". Bit of a let-down really.
- If London streets are your thing, consider picking up a copy of The London Encyclopedia and browsing through the Survey of London archives on http://british-history.ac.uk - there's piles of information in both.
Hope that's of use Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 22:58, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Adelphi, London (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Queen Mary
- Farringdon, London (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Chartreuse
- Leicester Square (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to William III
- Street names of Marylebone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Vere Street
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Street names of...
Hi. I see you've been creating a series of Street names of... articles. In these, you include street names that you've listed as being of unknown etymology. Do you have a source for the fact that the etymology of these names is unknown, or do you just mean unknown to you? If it's the latter, then I think this should be removed, as it is misleading to suggest that something is unknown when there may well be knowledge of it out there that you haven't yet discovered. Cordless Larry (talk) 06:31, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
thanks Larry - I've raised this as an issue on the Nav box talk page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:Street_name_etymologies_of_London#update_-_Nov_2017), let me know your thoguht. Sdrawkcab (talk) 14:42, 3 November 2017 (UTC)sdrawkcab
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Sdrawkcab. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Gabu, Guinea-Bissau
Hi Sdrawkcab. First of all, congartulations on your staying power! 14 years! Impressive. Anyway, going back 14 years, it is most likely that you might no longer remember what you did back then. I see that you created Gabu region. If you do remember, do you have any idea how you arrived at the spelling of Gabu with the accent on the u? Thanks, reagrds, Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 00:22, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited China–Tajikistan border, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pamir (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
File:Kazakh ASSR in 1932.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Kazakh ASSR in 1932.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:44, 29 October 2018 (UTC)
A cup of coffee for you!
Great article creation in Kyrgyzstan-Tajikistan border! Keep it up!
Regards, SshibumXZ (talk · contribs). 04:52, 5 November 2018 (UTC); edited 04:53, 5 November 2018 (UTC). |
Thanks! Sdrawkcab (talk) 19:55, 5 November 2018 (UTC)Sdrawkcab
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Sdrawkcab. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
This article, which you helped create in its present format, is being discussed. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 17:00, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kinross-shire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Loch Leven (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 23
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Ayrshire (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Arran
- County of Bute (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Arran
- Dunbartonshire (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Kilpatrick
- Renfrewshire (historic) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Ranfurly
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:41, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 30
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Kincardineshire (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Strathmore
- Roxburghshire (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Melrose
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:19, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 6
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- East Lothian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Belhaven
- Kincardineshire (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Strathmore
- Midlothian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Coniston
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 13
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Argyll (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Melfort, Kilmore and Liath Eilean
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:36, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 21
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Ross-shire (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Glenelg, Lewis, Inner Sound, Strathcarron, Nigg and Kilmuir
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:31, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 28
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sutherland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Loch Buidhe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:43, 28 June 2019 (UTC)
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from History of Saint Lucia into Saint Lucia. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:29, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Montserrat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Brandt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 15:55, 5 July 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 12
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Geography of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Johnson Point
- List of Caribbean islands (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Pigeon Island
- Saint Barthélemy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Gustavia
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:21, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
Encyclopedia Britannica usage
Best not use encyclopedias, which are designed to introduce readers to a topic, not to be the final point of reference....pls review Wikipedia:Tertiary-source fallacy.--Moxy 🍁 22:28, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Geography of Grenada, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hog Island (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:25, 19 July 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 26
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Collectivity of Saint Martin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- Sint Maarten (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:14, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 2
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
- Jamaica (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- Aruba (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Oranjestad
- Collectivity of Saint Martin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Carib
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Warning: Falkland Islands
Please consider this a formal warning that your edits at Falkland Islands are under scrutiny and will be notified at WP:AN/I. The article in question is a featured article, meaning its content and style has been evaluated and approved by numerous editors as meeting Wikipedia's content and style guidelines. Any major changes to the article's content and structure, as your edits do, must be discussed in the article's talk page.--MarshalN20 ✉🕊 22:23, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Great, thanks, you win, bye. Sdrawkcab (talk) 23:35, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Non-free rationale for File:John Compton, former PM of St Lucia.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:John Compton, former PM of St Lucia.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:34, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
Hi, I found the picture on the Russian Wikipedia (https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%BF%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%BD,_%D0%94%D0%B6%D0%BE%D0%BD) and had assumed therefore it was ok to use. Sdrawkcab (talk) 10:51, 1 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
A cup of tea for you!
For creating Scheduled monuments in Greater London. Keep up the good work! Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 01:41, 17 December 2019 (UTC) |
Thanks :) WisDom-UK (talk) 18:34, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
Image without license
Unspecified source/license for File:Map of the Cameroon-CAR border.png
Thanks for uploading File:Map of the Cameroon-CAR border.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}}
(to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}}
(to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 17:01, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
Borders templates
Please check the categories on these as you make them in the future: several were inaccurate (e.g. {{Borders of Lebanon}}) and we don't categorize templates by the topic that they cover (i.e. {{Borders of Lebanon}} does not go into Category:Borders of Lebanon). Otherwise, thanks for your working in making these. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:18, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
Your articles are welcome! Hope you're well!♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:23, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
- thanks :) About half-way through adding these border pages WisDom-UK (talk) 18:43, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
A New History of Western Philosophy moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, A New History of Western Philosophy, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 22:01, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
- thanks, have re-added with refs.WisDom-UK (talk) 22:13, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
- Hello, You should not have recreated the article, you should have improved the draft. In its current state, the article is not ready for main space. All content must be sourced by reliable sources, and it must meet our notability guidelines for books. Please find independent reliable sources (sales pages or postings by the publisher, author etc. are not independent and do not count towards establishing notability) and add them to the article as references. --Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 08:26, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- just delete the page - I can’t be bothered playing pingpong with the admins. WisDom-UK (talk) 18:11, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: A New History of Western Philosophy (March 1)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:A New History of Western Philosophy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:A New History of Western Philosophy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, WisDom-UK!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:52, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
|
File:Map of CAR-Chad in 1929.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Map of CAR-Chad in 1929.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Wikiacc (¶) 14:45, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
Slough
Slough is in Berkshire unless our article is very wrong. Philafrenzy (talk) 13:10, 8 June 2020 (UTC)
The article Turbulence (2011 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non notable film with no independent 3rd party coverage.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 19:22, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Most lists of notable people do not include specific references, as long as the related article backs up the claim then that is usually sufficient. If you want to add cn tags to all of them, you are going to be very busy. noq (talk) 11:07, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- I add tags to place articles I am working on. I do think it is better to cn them, as with any other information, though you are right in that I have neither the time nor inclination to go around doing all of them. I cn them when I come across them, as with any other unsourced claim, otherwise I could pick a random village article in Russia or India that no one monitors, start adding people to it, and the information will likely stay up there for a long time. WisDom-UK (talk) 11:12, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- The linked articles contain the references. Pretty much all the lists on wikipedia accept that as sufficient. If they do not, remove the unsupported names. Adding cn tags to some articles does nothing to stop someone adding random names to articles that are not being watched. noq ([[User
talk:Noq|talk]]) 11:18, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Well I agree that is probably sufficient, though it is extra work for people, in that they will have to click on an extra article to confirm the information's veracity, whereas a simple reference added to the place page will save them the hassle. Also, often within the person article the place of birth etc. is not referenced - numerous articles I've come across are like this.WisDom-UK (talk) 11:25, 23 September 2020 (UTC)i
- If the linked article does not have a reference, either remove the entry or improve the linked article by adding the reference there - It is a more appropriate place for it. If you are sufficiently interested in a person to check the reference, you are likely to read their article anyway so not really saving anything. noq (talk) 09:00, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Well I agree that is probably sufficient, though it is extra work for people, in that they will have to click on an extra article to confirm the information's veracity, whereas a simple reference added to the place page will save them the hassle. Also, often within the person article the place of birth etc. is not referenced - numerous articles I've come across are like this.WisDom-UK (talk) 11:25, 23 September 2020 (UTC)i
- The fact that Wikipedia is still chock full of unreferenced statements and assertions is why many still do not take it it seriously as an academic resource. However I also cannot be bothered arguing the point ad nauseum so let's just agree to disagree. WisDom-UK (talk) 11:19, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
September 2020
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on India-Nepal border; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Kautilya3 (talk) 23:21, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Please do not threaten me. ‘Repeatedly’ means changing more than once. I changed back the edits you made once. I am not edit warring, I am following Wikipedia protocols for border disputes and border pages which is that they are kept on one page. If you want to clog up Wikipedia with redundant pages by creating one page for X-Y border and another for x-y border dispute you will be very busy. WisDom-UK (talk) 23:26, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Page reorganisations are major edits. You don't get to them multiple times after they have been contested. Even for normal edits, the accepted practice is WP:BRD.
- As for "Wikipedia protocols", they are all written down, and you need to cite them when you refer to them. You can't make up your own protocols and expect everybody to obey them. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 13:59, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- By the way, most of your edits have been good and well-meaning and I appreciate them. You just need to be careful when disagreements arise. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 14:01, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
- Again, I did not make a major edit to the page 'multiple' times. I merged the pages, you reverted - I then reverted once, and you then reverted again. If you disagree with my edits, fine - but please do not misrepresent what I did as an 'edit war'. My changes were in line with standard practice, by which I mean the actual content on Wikipedia which I have been reading and editing for many years. Typically the practice I have observed is that articles with significant overlap or redundant content are merged. As it happens, I have only a passing interest in the subject - it was merely part of a wider project of improving the Asian border pages. I have a rule that if I spend more time arguing over policies or edits with people who have memorised the Wikipedia policy manual (or interpreted it in a way that suits their purposes) then I just move on, as it is not fun and I could be spending my time more productively actually improving or adding content. Do you want with the page as I am moving on to other areas. Bye.WisDom-UK (talk) 15:30, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
why not combine nominations?
Instead of nominating so many borders by country articles one at a time, why not just do a mass nomination? The reasoning you want them all gone is the same, as is the reasoning people give for wanting to keep any of them. Best to just have the conversation once in one place instead of having everyone just repeat themselves at dozens of locations. Dream Focus 21:39, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- Yes I will do that next time. I have not gone through the deletion process before.WisDom-UK (talk) 21:57, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Armenia/Azerbaijan discretionary sanctions
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Accidental revert
I misclicked and reverted one of your edits accidentally. I have rolled back my changes, but I just wanted to let you know. --Joshua Issac (talk) 21:03, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
- Cool no worries.WisDom-UK (talk) 21:30, 2 October 2020 (UTC)