User talk:Tiven2240/Archive 1

Tiven2240, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Tiven2240! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Clash with DD

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Clash with DD, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Atlantic306 (talk) 14:34, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

UTRS Account Request

I confirm that I have requested an account on the UTRS tool.Tiven gonsalves (Tiven gonsalves)

UTRS Account Request

(Tiven gonsalves 08:02, 23 September 2016 (UTC))

UTRS Account Request

Notice: Undefined index: language in /usr/UTRSgit/utrs/public_html/login.php on line 70

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Reply

Hi, thanks for message. You can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~~~~. I deleted your article because

• it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the company, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company claims or interviewing its management. You listed the company's social media, but they are not independent third-party sources. Note also that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting
• I can't see any indication that it actually meets the notability guidelines linked above, you have given no evidence that this isn't just another of the non-notable apps or YouTube channels we are bombarded with every day
• it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: well known organization... known for its all round contribution in the IT sector... leading Android app... exclusively available on the Amazon playstore... creative ideas to bring about a change in the world... best personalitiesand that's just the first paragraph, complete with sales pitch!
• The organization has given me full authority to contribute it to wikipedia— not surprising when it's your own company. You are not allowed to advertise here, and you should not edit articles in which you have a conflict of interest. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Wikipedia:Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Wikipedia:Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.
• Since it is your company, you are very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if you have a financial interest in the company you are writing about, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Tiven2240. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Tiven2240|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block. Please do not edit further until you respond to this message. Jimfbleak (talk) 10:21, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Clash with DD

1. You posted the page to Wikipedia:Clash with DD, which was clearly not the right place for it. When you did so, you used an edit summary which said "...it is not to be into mainspace", which at first I took as meaning that you were deliberately using Wikipedia space to hold a page which you knew was unsuitable for mainspace, so I was going to delete it. However, I then decided that more probably that was a mistake (perhaps a typo for "...it is now to be into mainspace", so I moved it to Clash with DD. Please tell me if I was wrong.
2. You should not be posting an article on this subject, as doing so is contrary to the conflict of interest guidelines. You should instead have submitted it as an "article for creation" for review by an independent editor. Please don't attempt to put any page on a subject on which you have a conflict of interest into article space again.
3. The subject does not come within a thousand miles of satisfying Wikipedia's notability guidelines. I am therefore going to propose it for deletion. You will be free to contest the proposal by removing the template from the article, but if you do so the article will go to a deletion discussion, where I have little doubt it will be deleted anyway, so the only effect of your contesting the proposal will virtually certainly be to take up the time of editors in discussion which will make no difference to what happens to the article. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:23, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Tiven2240/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 05:29, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Promotional and unsourced editing

I was interested to see this edit.

1. Such blatantly promotional content ("Holy cross high school is well known for its excellent teaching staff", "delivers it's [sic] students the best of its ability", "working continuously to provide knowledge to its students", "nurturing a large number of students", "very helpful in shaping the future of its students", "The whole teaching staff is well trained and upgraded to its max to give the students the best of its contents" etc etc) is totally inappropriate in an article, and inconsistent with Wikipedia policy. Please don't continue to add promotional content to Wikipedia: doing so may lead to being blocked from editing.
2. You probably noticed that one of the reasons I gave for deletion was that the content was unsourced. Wikipedia policy is that if unsourced content is challenged and removed, it must not be restored without providing references to reliable sources. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:45, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Clash with DD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clash with DD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clash with DD until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:50, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

October 2016

Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Michael High School, Kurla. I noticed that when you added the image to the infobox, you added it as a thumbnail. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

|image=SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:23, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

A few words of advice

If you are hoping for the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clash with DD to conclude with the article being kept, then the most effective way of trying to achieve that is to give reasons why the subject of the article satisfies Wikipedia's notability guideline. Even if you sincerely believe that I am lying in saying that I think the article should be deleted because it does not do so, and that really my secret motive is a wish to "suppress the new editors", the administrator who assesses the discussion is unlikely to give any weight to that suggestion: generally speaking, arguments based on attacking other editors and accusing them of evil motives are not taken note of. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:52, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Some other unrelated advice - "Admininstrator Review" is where we review admin, it is not where editors go to be reviewed by admin. FYI. Sergecross73 msg me 14:46, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tu Maza Jeev (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tu Maza Jeev and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:18, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Page Curation

Probably best you read how to actually do this before making any more edits with it. Waste of everyone's time tagging a stub with this. Lugnuts ^{Precious bodily fluids} 09:21, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

You're now mis-using this tool. If you continue, it will be viewed as distuption and you will face being blocked. Please reply here to state you understand. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Precious bodily fluids} 09:23, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

  This is to make u understand that I am not miss using any tool if u think so please do assist me

I came here to raise a similar concern with you, and found that I was not the first: which should suggest that you might actually be doing something wrong. Please, take a step back, read the relevant policies (WP:N, WP:NPOV, and WP:V, for starters), familiarize yourself with the tool, and only then begin to use it. Vanamonde (talk) 10:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Vanamonde Thanks for reaching out and explaining me the same,keep up doing the great work

Amikam Norkin

Hi Tiven2240, Yes, I do have a problem with your proposed deletion. As your own template states "All biographies of living people created after March 2010 must have at least one reference to a reliable source." Have you actually looked at the article? It fully satisfies that criteria. I fail to understand why the article should be deleted and think you should undo your nomination. Poliocretes (talk) 09:52, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Poliocretes Thanks for reaching out to me. As regarding your article it has to be briefly expanded as per Wikipedia Terms and conditions to must cite it to more reliable source with more content in it . Please do the same so I can give a reason to be it on Wikipedia or it shall be contested for deletion— Preceding unsigned comment added by Tiven2240 (talk • contribs) 10:02, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Tiven2240, Poliocretes is correct - BLPPROD does not apply where there is a source and I have removed the prod tag. Tagging a recently created stub with "one source" is also a bit premature, and I have noticed a few other problematic taggings from today. Maybe you could slow down a bit and read up on what the relevant policies say? Thanks, --bonadea contributions talk 11:48, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Cornelius Edison

The article a) meets notability, b) is not incomprehensible, and c) not overly detailed. On the first point, he's played in at least one professional football game which is a requirement for notability, also just do a Google search. On the second, you never cared to explain how it was remotely incomprehensible. Lastly, it's not even remotely overly detailed. The information given are facts about the seasons he played. That's it, nothing more. I recommend you at least read articles before you tag them, or at least give examples of the issues. Something you failed to do. ^{(talk page stalker)} CrashUnderride 11:00, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Thanks for reviewing Greg Clark (born 1965), Tiven2240.

Unfortunately TonyBallioni has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

This article is not eligible for BLP PROD as it contained sources at the time of tag placement.

To reply, leave a comment on TonyBallioni's talk page.

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. TonyBallioni (talk) 12:17, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm TonyBallioni. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, James Slack, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. TonyBallioni (talk) 12:19, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Please cease use of the page curation tool

It is clear that you do not have a sufficient grasp of Wikipedia policies to use it correctly.

After you have more experience, I encourage you to identify a mentor, who can monitor your use of the tool, and if you seem to have learned, can give you permission to use it again.--S Philbrick(Talk) 14:38, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

S Philbrick after a long study of how to use the tool I have come to know how to use it properly so give me access to use the Page curation tool Tiven gonsalves 06:28, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Really? Was the before or after your gross misuse of it? ^{(talk page stalker)} CrashUnderride 06:35, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Obviously we will learn from our mistakes Crash There is no need of doing such a big dramatic scenes on the administrator incident page as I have no personal emity from u. U must have shame and act like shilbrick who believes to make understand people rather than u making a mess everywhere strictly warning from me to u Tiven gonsalves 06:43, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Hey, I didn't start the ANI regarding you. I just commented on it. And provided additional evidence that you don't know how to properly use Page Curation. ^{(talk page stalker)} CrashUnderride 07:17, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

• Tiven2240, you have been asked to stop doing page curation, and I'm another admin supporting that request. While I acknowledge your enthusiasm and your willingness to help, page curation requires significantly more experience than you currently possess - reviewing new pages incorrectly (like tagging them wrongly, for example), can do harm to the project by discouraging and scaring away newcomers. And it's not simply a matter of studying how to use the tool, but of having a good understanding of a large number of relevant Wikipedia policies, and you clearly do not yet have that understanding. Soon, there will be a technical change made to prevent inexperienced editors like you using the Page Curation tool until they apply for and are granted the appropriate user right, but until that happens we have to rely on people stopping when asked. You don't seem to be willing to take that advice and stop, so I am now *telling* you - stop doing page curation, or you will be blocked from editing. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:35, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia Asian Month!

Hi there! Thanks for joining Wikipedia Asian Month. Here is some information about participating in the event:

1. Please submit your articles via this tool. Click 'log in' at the top-right and OAuth will take care the rest. You can also change the interface language at the top-right.
2. Once you submit an article, the tool will add a template to the article and mark it as needing review by an organizer. You can check your progress using the tool, which includes how many accepted articles you have.
3. Participants who achieve 4 accepted articles will receive a Wikipedia Asian Month postcard. You will receive another special postcard if you achieve 15 accepted articles. The Wikipedian with the highest number of accepted articles on the English Wikipedia will be honored as a "Wikipedia Asian Ambassador", and will receive a signed certificate and additional postcard.
4. If you have any problems accessing or using the tool, you can submit your articles at this page next to your username.
5. Wikipedia Asian Month is also held in other language Wikipedia and count independently. Check for other language editions.
6. If you have any question, you can take a look at our Q&A or post on the WAM talk page.

Best Wishes,--AddisWang (talk) 16:07, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

Your addition to Guru Nanak College (GTB nagar) Mumbai has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 10:03, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

This concerns me, for someone who is involved in reviewing new pages. Please take Boing! said Zebedee's advice and stop using Page Curation. Now. Otherwise, I think that you'll be forced to stop through technical means, which may also stop you editing the English Wikipedia entirely - I don't want this to happen as I don't think you're doing this to be intentionally disruptive. Mike1901 (talk) 11:56, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Tu Maza Jeev has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tu Maza Jeev. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 22:07, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Tu Maza Jeev. I noticed that when you added the image to the infobox, you added it as a thumbnail. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

|image=SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 17:27, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Tu Maza Jeev has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tu Maza Jeev. Thanks! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 18:46, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Deletion proposal for James Slack page

Thanks for taking the time to check the page. I have added a reference to the biography, as you suggested. user:lakeview —Preceding undated comment added 20:34, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

Please stop making disruptive edits.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Stop moving your own draft to mainspace. It is nowhere ready to be a Wikipedia article, and you don't seem to pay any attention to the comments left by reviewers. bonadea contributions talk 08:59, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

The point of using the Articles for Creation process is that you get an editor who is experienced and understands Wikipedia policies to review the article - the creator of the AfC article does not move it her/himself but waits for the review. The issues pointed out in the most recent notices are not addressed so it is unlikely that the reviewer would accept the article, but that is for them to say. That's why you use that process after all. --bonadea contributions talk 09:05, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

bonadea I am waiting from a long time then too there is no response so what should I do Tiven gonsalves 09:09, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

It has been five days since the draft was most recently rejected and you resubmitted it. The notice at the top clearly says that the process can take two or three weeks. You have also received comments from several different editors on your draft, with suggestions for improvements, most recently two days ago. Instead of circumventing the process you might try to address those issues. Again, if the draft is reviewed as it currently looks it will probably not be accepted since it does not show why the movie meets WP:NFILM, and also because it is confusing and difficult to understand. --bonadea contributions talk 09:18, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Knock it off

Seriously, you've been told by an admin to stop using Page Curation. What do you not get? If you continue, an admin will block you for not listening. ^{(talk page stalker)} CrashUnderride 09:55, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Blocked

I told you to stop doing New Page Patrol and reviewing new articles, and told you that you would be blocked if you continued. You continued, proposing a BLP page for deletion on the grounds that it had no sources when it clearly did, and you gave a new user a completely unwarranted notification about a non-existent problem with their new article. I have removed the nonsense you posted on their talk page, and I have given them the welcome message they should have had instead.

This behaviour Patrolling new pages when you do not have the experience is disruptive, and it has to stop. Unfortunately, the only way to achieve that appears to be to block you from editing, and so you are now blocked for 48 hours. If you continue to perform Page Curation when this block expires, you will be blocked for longer.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:36, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Tiven2240 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I know that I have used the page curation tool inspite of warnings but today my usage of it was to make proper the mistakes i made before , and about the messages i am happy that people contribute towards Wikipedia so I had written .i havent done anything wrong and some members are truly against me and are only propagating my mistakes i believe my usage for betterment of wikipedia and reach it out to the weaker sections of people. if my actions hurt you i m extremely sorry for that and if properly explained i won't repeat it Tiven gonsalves 12:13, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Accept reason:

I'm happy with the response below, and your account is now unblocked. Welcome back. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:29, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

• Actually, I must apologise for an error in my message above, as I see the incorrect BLP PROD was actually before I issued my previous warning - I have struck that part of the message. But you did continue to perform Page Curation, as seen here. That specific example is not itself problematic, but your inexperience means we really can't have you doing these things yet - and you really should not be offering advice to new editors while you are still a new editor yourself. Please understand that nobody is against you. I'm certainly not - I just want to help you become the best Wikipedia editor you can, but that means helping you avoid the things you should not be doing yet and preventing you getting into more trouble later. I'll be happy to unblock you if you promise not to do any new page reviewing, do not use the Page Curation tool at all, do no new article tagging, and do not offer advice to newcomers while you do not have sufficient experience to do so. How does that sound? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:34, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

I strongly know you Boing! said Zebedee are working very hard to maintain the sanity of wikipedia! Good work.. I appreciate your contributions.. It's good to hear that you are ready to unblock me on the three condition

1. no page curation
2. no new article tag
3. no advice to new comers

Boing! said Zebedee. I ACCEPT YOUR CONDITIONS AND PREFER TO MAKE A NEW START If u find me wrong in anything again u dont hesitate to inform me and then warn and if I go out my way bleaching the T&C of wikipedia feel free to block me and please don't take decisions in harsh as i find a member against me and my progress as I will fix his issue soon😂👍

Lastly I wanna request you to close down the matter on the Administrators noticeboard as the matter has been compensated here 💝 ✝✝✝ Tiven gonsalves 12:59, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

That all sounds good to me, and thank you for your kind words. I would generally suggest taking things slowly, and if you are unsure of any area of Wikipedia policy ask someone rather than just diving in - my Talk page is always open and I'll be happy to help if I can. And yes, I think we can close that ANI section now - I'll go and do that as soon as I've posted this. I'll end by thanking you for your enthusiasm and for listening to the advice we're giving you, and I'm sure you will have a long and fruitful time here at Wikipedia! Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:29, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tu Maza Jeev (November 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GeoffreyT2000 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tu Maza Jeev and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 01:32, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Tu Maza Jeev for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tu Maza Jeev is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tu Maza Jeev until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. bonadea contributions talk 17:58, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Your signature

Hi Tiven2240. I saw your post at the Wikipedia Teahouse and noticed that you seem to have created a special signature for yourself. That's fine, but your signature does not contain any links to your user page or your user talk page as required by WP:SIGLINK. In addition, if you take another look at your post you'll notice that a Template:Unsigned was added to it with this edit by User:SignBot. That's because your signature is not being recognized by the Wikipedia software. My suggestion to you would be to take a look at WP:CUSTOMSIG and check if you accidentally did something to the signature's markup. You can also ask for specific advice at WP:VPT. It's quite possible that you just checked/unchecked the wrong box by mistake. A proper signature is important because it allows other editors to easily find out who made an edit and when, and then contact that person if necessary, so you should try and figure out what's wrong with yours asap. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:27, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Mother Teressa

Sorry for the fact that the article's review got closed, but I hope you keep editing it (or others) to make GA (Good Articles). FAs can be tiring to get due to how demanding they are whereas GAs less strict. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 14:13, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

@Tintor2:Thanks for your support I'll next try to resubmit the application of the article as GA and I hope for an affirmative again thanks for being kind and loyal keep on the spirit --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०^{†ลℓк †๏ мэ} 15:06, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

If you ever feel like the articles you work on need attention you can request a peer review or copy-edit if you think the prose is not good enough.Tintor2 (talk) 15:16, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

@Tintor2: sure I'll thanks--✝iѵɛɳ२२४०^{†ลℓк †๏ мэ} 15:41, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

East Indian language

• Wrong number.
• Is the Marathi name the name of the language or of the people?Xx236 (talk) 08:50, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

@Xx236: its the both. --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०^{†ลℓк †๏ мэ} 08:56, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for creating this, Tiven. I have access to some academic sources at work (I am a linguist, although not an expert on Indian languages) and when I have the time I'll try to add some more sources to this article. I think the current references are adequate to show why there should be an article about the subject. I did some minor fixes to the article, linking "Marathi" to Marathi language (because the dialect is a variant of the language and not of the people ;-) ) and so on; like most other articles it could use some more work, but it's a good beginning I think! --bonadea contributions talk 12:42, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

@Bonadea: if u want any help in this matter on the marathi or hindi language or any indian topic feel free to contact me as I contribute to marathi and hindi version of wiki too and I won't hesitate to help.. --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०^{†ลℓк †๏ мэ} 14:15, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, I appreciate that, but the point of what I wrote above seems to have been somewhat lost. We are writing an encyclopedia here and for articles about languages we use sources based on what experts say, and sources based on research, not our own experience. Hopefully you are aware of the distinction between being a speaker of a language and an expert on that language. Most native speakers of a language (any language) are not experts on it. --bonadea contributions talk 08:10, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mother Teresa

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mother Teresa you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tiven2240 -- Tiven2240 (talk) 17:40, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Tiven2240, I'm afraid you don't understand how GA nominations work. The person who nominates a GA should not then go and open the review, as you have done here; nominators are not allowed to review their own nominations, and by opening the review you've blocked anyone else from reviewing the article. In order to fix this, I'm going to have to nominate the Talk:Mother Teresa/GA2 page for a speedy deletion. Please do not object to the speedy deletion; it really is necessary to get this page deleted, since a valid reviewer can't be found while the page still exists.

You have also nominated the article for a Good Article Reassessment. This is completely out of process. A reassessment should not be done while a nomination is underway, as they both have the purpose of determining whether an article is of GA quality, but the reassessment is almost invariably of an article that is currently a GA. I am removing the GAR request, and will be doing a speedy deletion nomination of the community reassessment page, since it is not appropriate. Please find yourself a mentor to advise you how things work; it will help you avoid major errors in the future. Please also note that the Mother Teresa article will likely fail unless the sourcing is improved. In addition to the two "citation needed" templates, you recently tried to cite another Wikipedia as a source (by definition, Wikipedia is not a reliable source), and have also cited at least one blog. Blogs are typically not considered reliable sources; you'll want to acquaint yourself with proper sourcing methods if you wish to succeed in getting the article to GA status. Best of luck. BlueMoonset (talk) 07:04, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

• Hello Tiven2240! You evidently are new to Wikipedia and looking at your talk page posts on teahouse or on a bot's page I understand that you have a long time to make here before nominating GA article. Irrespective of those, GA nominations should be made by editors who have considerably edited the subject article. I see that you are not a major contributor to Mother Teresa, nor Arvind Kejriwal which you also nominated. I am simply going to revert your nominations to avoid editors waste their time in reviewing it and leave a dent of failed nomination. Happy editing. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:40, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mother Teresa

The article Mother Teresa you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Mother Teresa for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tiven2240 -- Tiven2240 (talk) 04:21, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Marcação da imagem File:Casablanca Produtora.png (portuguese) / Image marking File: Casablanca Produtora.png (english)

Good evening,

I would like to request help, I need to change the license assigned to the file I uploaded to Wikimedia Commons.

For lack of accurate information, assign an incorrect license to the file in question.

The correct license is Copyright, not Creative Commons

File:Casablanca Produtora.png

URL of the author of the image is: http://www.casablancafilmes.com.br Author: © 2017 Casablanca

No further, I'm waiting.

--WSO.SPMinas (talk) 03:24, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rajeev Dasot IPS (March 19)

{{subst:Afc decline|full=Draft:Rajeev Dasot IPS|cv=no|reason=bio|details=|comment=We need non-trivial discussion in [[WP:RS}].And no news sources from France etc. to prove that a bridge collapsed in Rajasthan!|sig=yes}}

Hello! Tiven2240, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Winged Blades Godric 12:25, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Re-initiating INCOTM

It's been almost an year since "Indian collaboration of the month" was active. Firstly we need to restart this as soon as possible for development of India-related articles to greater heights. The members page was blanked, where many of them are inactive. This mass message is to all the members of WikiProject India, about this and interested editors interested will sign up. After this message gets delivered, we'll wait for 7 days before we start a discussion under a thread on the collaboration's talk page, among the members. The discussion will include what to clean-up of sub-pages, a new set of guidelines for smooth and uninterrupted functioning of the collaboration etc. Please keep all the discussions under this thread only, so that it will easier for future reference. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Re-initiating INCOTM

It's been almost an year since "Indian collaboration of the month" was active. Firstly we need to restart this as soon as possible for development of India-related articles to greater heights. The members page was blanked, where many of them are inactive. This mass message is to all the members of WikiProject India, about this and interested editors interested will sign up. After this message gets delivered, we'll wait for 7 days before we start a discussion under a thread on the collaboration's talk page, among the members. The discussion will include what to clean-up of sub-pages, a new set of guidelines for smooth and uninterrupted functioning of the collaboration etc. Please keep all the discussions under this thread only, so that it will easier for future reference. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Incubator/Indian military history

You are invited to join the Indian military history work-group, an initiative of the Military history WikiProject. This group is to exclusively deal with the topics related to Indian military. If you're interested, please add you name to the participants list. Ignore if you are already a member. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Indian defence services

You are requested to participate in the discussion of Wiki Loves Indian defence services on the talk page of WikiProject India. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:44, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Guru Nanak College (GTB nagar) Mumbai

Hi, I'm Teblick. Tiven2240, thanks for creating Guru Nanak College (GTB nagar) Mumbai!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This article needs more independent, reliable references. The only reference appears to be a personal evaluation of the college rather than a source with objective coverage.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Eddie Blick (talk) 23:24, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Discussion to restart Indian collaborations of the month.

A discussion on INCOTM's talk page has been initiated. It includes various steps to be taken to keep the project alive and also regarding electing the coordinators. Please discuss. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

Your help desk question

You have a response.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 19:39, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Phoebe Lin

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Phoebe Lin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Skamecrazy123 (talk) 05:27, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Phoebe Lin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Phoebe Lin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phoebe Lin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 16:50, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Indic script

Please STOP adding and re-adding Indic script to our articles as this contravenes WP:INDICSCRIPT - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 17:36, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

NPP

When tagging articles (音樂大童) for 'Not English' please include the language. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:44, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Abortion article video

Hi there, Tiven2240: I noticed that you placed a well-made video at the heading to the article on Abortion, which is several minutes long and has many words. While the video may contain only content from the article, I opened a new talk page discussion and also messaged frequent contributor user:Doc_James (sp?) that this video was added without talk page consensus, which is not normally recommended--- especially for a controversial subject like this. I hope this message finds you well. 208.76.28.70 (talk) 15:54, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for yr message--✝iѵɛɳ२२४०^{†ลℓк †๏ мэ}

Replaceable fair use File:President Kovind.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:President Kovind.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Train2104 (t • c) 09:43, 25 July 2017 (UTC)