PSPazW

Welcome

Hello, PSPazW, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! CommanderWaterford (talk) 13:28, 1 June 2020 (UTC) Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PSPazW (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

My old account was blocked some time ago, and I wanted to get a new start with a new account. I'm no longer using the old account - I lost the password. This is currently my only account. PSPazW (talk) 23:52, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Not enough context here. Which old account are you talking about? Yamla (talk) 00:45, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PSPazW (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

jsobel was the old account PSPazW (talk) 00:50, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Based on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dan Sander, that doesn't seem to be the case. only (talk) 10:20, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PSPazW (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Thanks, but I'm sorry - I'm not clear what the issue is. This is a new account, I no longer use or have access to the old jsobel account, and to best of my knowledge, I have not broken any Wikipedia guidelines. Can you please specify what the issue is, and how I can rectify it to be unblocked? Thank you. PSPazW (talk) 8:23 am, Today (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

Your editing patterns are consistent with what we usually see from paid editors, and in addition to that our technical logs (linked by Only above) suggest that a direct connection to several other accounts that have been engaging in covert advertisement. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:44, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

PSPazW (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Thanks so much for the feedback. Yes, in looking more closely at Wikipedia guidelines for paid contributions, I realize I should have added a statement on the talk page accompanying any paid contributions that I made. I will make sure to do that in the future, and will do so for any post paid contributions that I have previously made. Regarding your comment about other accounts that have been engaging in covert advertisement, I do not have any connections to any other accounts. I'm not sure how you have gotten that information, but this must be a mistake. PSPazW (talk) 22:13, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Accept reason:

After consulting the CheckUser who delivered the SPI results, I am going to grant this unblock request. Please be sure that your future contributions are consistent with WP:PAID and WP:COI. I'm also blocking the Jsobel123 account – you can use this account or Jsobel123, but not both, so let me know if you'd prefer to use that one. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 23:45, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

• To the reviewing administrator: on the sockpuppetry front, the technical picture is consistent with PSPazW's explanation that Jsobel123 (talk · contribs) is the only previous account used by this user. Feel free to make unblock decisions on that basis. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 19:08, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

@L235: Thank you very much. I'll continue to use PSPazW. PSPazW (talk) 00:00, 1 October 2020 (UTC) @L235: I'm trying to add COI articles to my user page but it looks like it's still blocked. PSPazW (talk) 18:18, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

You seem to be editing other pages so you should be able to edit your user page. If it still doesn't work let me know what the message is and I'll do my best to investigate. If it's just the "This account is a suspected sockpuppet of Dan Sander (talk · contribs · logs) and has been blocked indefinitely" message you can remove that if you'd like – that's just a maintenance tag and doesn't actually create a block on its own. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 18:44, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

@L235: Ah, I see that now. Thank you! PSPazW (talk) 18:47, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, PSPazW

Thank you for creating Christian French.

User:Barkeep49, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for disclosing your paid editing on this article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Barkeep49}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Barkeep49 (talk) 19:13, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

The Jacks (band) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, The Jacks (band), has issues with our copyright policy and needs to be reviewed by an AfC reviewer owing to your paid editing disclosure. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Barkeep49 (talk) 19:20, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Nana (American rapper) moved to draftspace

Thank you for complying with our pay disclosure policy by placing a notice on the talk page. However, as a paid editor you are also required to submit new articles through WP:AFC, rather than creating them in mainspace. You can submit this draft by clicking on the template that has been placed at the top of the article. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:08, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Josie Man (January 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Josie Man and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Josie Man, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 19:38, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, PSPazW! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MurielMary (talk) 19:38, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nana (American rapper) (March 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by -noah- was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nana (American rapper) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Nana (American rapper), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Noah!^💬 19:26, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Phat Phunktion has been accepted

Phat Phunktion, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Pbrks (talk) 22:26, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stacy Amma Osei-Kuffour has been accepted

Stacy Amma Osei-Kuffour, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

K.e.coffman (talk) 05:43, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: SongVest has been accepted

SongVest, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 01:35, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anne McCabe (July 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MurielMary were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anne McCabe and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Anne McCabe, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 13:14, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chrome Sparks (July 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chrome Sparks and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Chrome Sparks, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:56, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Steve Adelman (July 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Steve Adelman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Steve Adelman, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chris Troutman (talk) 00:56, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Nana (American rapper)

Hello, PSPazW. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nana (American rapper), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Nana (American rapper)

Hello, PSPazW. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nana".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:12, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Loney Hutchins has been accepted

Loney Hutchins, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MoonlightVector^{Talk page} 19:26, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: OTR (musician) (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:OTR (musician) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:OTR (musician), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 17:57, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Edgeout Records

Hello, I see you used to edit under the name Jsobel123, which is the editor who started the page Edgeout Records. Can you please confirm for me if you were paid to create this article? Thank you Chubbles (talk) 15:55, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Answer: Yes. (This was before I understood the disclosure rules.)

Ok Thank you Chubbles (talk) 15:16, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Papo Vázquez has been accepted

Papo Vázquez, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 08:26, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Anne McCabe

Hello, PSPazW. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anne McCabe, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Steve Adelman

Hello, PSPazW. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Steve Adelman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:03, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dallas String Quartet has been accepted

Dallas String Quartet, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 05:12, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Chrome Sparks

Hello, PSPazW. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chrome Sparks, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Steve Adelman

Hello, PSPazW. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Steve Adelman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:56, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Chrome Sparks

Hello, PSPazW. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chrome Sparks".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:44, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Courtney Stewart has been accepted

Courtney Stewart, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Doric Loon (talk) 18:19, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:OTR (musician)

Hello, PSPazW. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:OTR (musician), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Nicolas Namoradze has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Nicolas Namoradze. Thanks! Noahfgodard (talk) 19:27, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello - appreciate your check-in! I did this one unpaid. PSPazW (talk) 16:07, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Userpage paid disclosures

I have inserted a blank line in between each of your paid editing disclosures on your userpage. Before, they were all displaying as one unbroken line and wrapping at random places, making it difficult to read. With the blank lines it is far more legible. Please include a blank line with any new disclosures you add - thank you. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:04, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

Thank you. Will do. PSPazW (talk) 17:54, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:OTR (musician)

Hello, PSPazW. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "OTR".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:42, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bette Smith (May 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HenryTemplo was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bette Smith and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bette Smith, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

HenryTemplo (talk) 09:33, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicolas Namoradze has been accepted

Nicolas Namoradze, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Israell (talk) 15:13, 4 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pip Millett has been accepted

Pip Millett, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Missvain (talk) 05:10, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bette Smith has been accepted

Bette Smith, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Missvain (talk) 18:47, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nana (American rapper) (July 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nana (American rapper) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 01:55, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wray Armstrong (August 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 97198 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Wray Armstrong and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

97198 (talk) 10:03, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fousheé has been accepted

Fousheé, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 04:08, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ana Cristina Cash has been accepted

Ana Cristina Cash, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:53, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Greg Suess (December 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Clarityfiend was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Greg Suess and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Clarityfiend (talk) 08:36, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Wray Armstrong

Hello, PSPazW. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wray Armstrong, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Nana (American rapper)

Hello, PSPazW. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Nana".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:59, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sam Milgrom has been accepted

Sam Milgrom, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cabrils (talk) 23:42, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Wray Armstrong

Hello, PSPazW. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Wray Armstrong".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 12:53, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Robert Sirota

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Robert Sirota requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.jensenartists.com/robert-sirota. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:07, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Robert Sirota moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Robert Sirota, is not suitable as written to remain published. Since you have declared your paid editing status, this must go through AfC for review. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:43, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Thanks, OneI. I always submit my paid contributions through the editorial system, but in this case it didn't give me that option; somehow because a previous draft was still in the system, it only allowed me to directly publish my new one. I'll try again to submit properly and see if it works this time. PSPazW (talk) 18:11, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Sirota has been accepted

Robert Sirota, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 04:43, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pasquale Grasso has been accepted

Pasquale Grasso, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BuySomeApples (talk) 04:07, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Odunsi (The Engine) (April 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Odunsi (The Engine) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 14:42, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Fair enough, but then why has the existing, inferior page been allowed to stay up so far? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Odunsi_the_Engine PSPazW (talk) 15:20, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

User:AngusWOOF Why is the other page on the same non-notable subject still up? PSPazW (talk) 01:23, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

You have some options:

1) If Odunsi is not notable, send the one in mainspace to AFD

2) Move your draft content to that page to improve it and make it a redirect to the mainspace one. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 19:51, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Greg Suess

Hello, PSPazW. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Greg Suess, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:05, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Untitled Space has been accepted

The Untitled Space, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

❯❯❯ Raydann^(Talk) 09:13, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Thank you Raydann!

If you're knowledgeable about art and galleries, is there any chance you could take a look at this one too? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Musichead_Gallery PSPazW (talk) 12:39, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Jeff Slate has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jeff Slate. Thanks! Satdeep Gill (talk • contribs 22:15, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

I've made some changes in response – thanks for your suggestions! PSPazW (talk) 14:34, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jeff Slate (July 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sionk was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jeff Slate and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sionk (talk) 21:07, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blake Mills, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Feist. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gabríel Ólafs has been accepted

Gabríel Ólafs, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Numberguy6 (talk) 17:42, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Musichead Gallery has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Musichead Gallery. Thanks! Newystats (talk) 05:42, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Musichead Gallery (August 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Newystats were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Musichead Gallery and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Newystats (talk) 05:44, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Odunsi (The Engine)

Hello, PSPazW. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Odunsi (The Engine), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:03, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:John Summit has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:John Summit. Thanks! Cabrils (talk) 03:01, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matt Pierson (October 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Matt Pierson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 18:44, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Odunsi (The Engine)

Hello, PSPazW. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Odunsi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:42, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Natalie Jane (October 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spinster300 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Natalie Jane and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Spinster300 (talk) 11:04, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Natalie Jane has been accepted

Natalie Jane, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Spinster300 (talk) 19:37, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Summit (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Summit and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 19:27, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fahren Feingold has been accepted

Fahren Feingold, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

- Rich^T|C|E-Mail 17:53, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matt Pierson (November 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Matt Pierson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 19:05, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Summit has been accepted

John Summit, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 13:55, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Musichead Gallery

Hello, PSPazW. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Musichead Gallery, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:06, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.Deb (talk) 10:24, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Jeff Slate

Hello, PSPazW. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jeff Slate".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 01:39, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Vindys has been accepted

The Vindys, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

—Alalch E. 15:10, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, PSPazW. Thank you for your work on The Vindys. Alalch E., while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

This is okay, thank you. Kindly review the changes I've made here before accepting (not determinative wrt acceptance, just me talking as an editor), for a possible future reference regarding style.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Alalch E.}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

—Alalch E. 15:15, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

@Alalch E.:

TY for the sensible edits. :-)

PSPazW (talk) 15:30, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jupiter String Quartet has been accepted

Jupiter String Quartet, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheBritinator (talk) 15:53, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jonathan Shank (March 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jonathan Shank and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 04:09, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello! I'm wondering what you felt was insufficient here, since I've got more than 10 press sources focused specifically on the subject. Is it that most of these sources are industry press as opposed to more "mainstream" press? Hoping to gain some guidance for improving it. Thanks! PSPazW (talk) 19:03, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

March 2024

Hello! Please see this talk section and do whatever is needed. We can't just waltz in and change text while leaving the sources unchanged and made incorrect. In this case, for clarity, it must be mentioned, with the sources already cited, that her name is given in different versions in various sources. SergeWoodzing (talk) 10:34, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Matt Pierson

Hello, PSPazW. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Matt Pierson".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:25, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Audius (blockchain music network) (May 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Audius (blockchain music network) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Liance^talk 19:02, 30 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your feedback – I didn't know that about the cryptocurrency news outlets. I've replaced those citations with more reliable ones. PSPazW (talk) 14:25, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cary Baker (June 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cary Baker and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 17:47, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi @S0091: and @PSPazW:

I have a conflict of interest! I have known Cary Baker since I was a teenager; I was an REM fanatic and he was their publicist. That said, PSPazW, if you search ProQuest via the Wikipedia Library and Google books I suspect you will find the necessary coverage. If not, I'm sure there will be ample press when the book comes out. JSFarman (talk) 20:28, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Oh yeah, I didn't notice PSPazW meets the requirements for WP:Wikipedia Library access. PSPazW it should be automatic, meaning you don't need to request access. S0091 (talk) 20:39, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Paid disclosure

Hi PSPazW, first thank for you making the disclosures on you User page. I looked the for one regarding Cory Baker but did not find one specific to him. I am assuming it is one them though. Can you point me to which one? I also assume all your editing is on the behalf of a client. If that is correct, it might be good idea to make a blanket statement at the top of your User page simply stating you are a paid editor. I also wonder if it wouldn't be more efficient/clear to list the drafts/articles on your User page and make the more detailed declaration on the draft/article's talk pages? S0091 (talk) 18:20, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi and thanks for the helpful comments. Conqueroo is the client for the Cary Baker article. Regarding reviews of his book, it's not out till this fall and so there are no reviews yet. I'm going to look for better citations for the narrative, although I have done a pretty thorough search already. Also there will be a citation for his papers being at the Rock Hall of Fame available soon. PSPazW (talk) 18:53, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

And I forgot to put my disclosure on the article talk page. It's there now. :-) PSPazW (talk) 18:56, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing to the disclosure. As for as the disclosure on the talk page, actually the WP:Paid policy states "or", quote: They must do this on their main user page, or on the talk page accompanying any paid contributions, or in edit summaries. so technically you are not required to do both (but please keep doing it because it is helpful). That's why I am wondering if there's not a better approach for a scenario like yours. My guess is when the core policy developed editors assumed client=draft/article but that's not the situation here. If I understand it correctly, you are person/firm A (PSPazW) who has been hired by person/firm B (Oren Hope, they pay you/firm A) to edit/create articles on Wikipedia behalf the clients of person/firm C (Conqueroo, who pays Oren), which could be several draft/articles. Is that about right or am I off? To be clear, you are doing everything right so this is not a complaint. S0091 (talk) 19:24, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Yes, that's basically right. PSPazW (talk) 19:54, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

Thanks PSPazW. There's no additional actions you need to take other than keep doing what you have doing as far the disclosures. For Baker, reviews of his book might be enough for notability but so much of the content is supported by sources based on what he says about himself that it might still fail WP:NPOV. S0091 (talk) 20:22, 12 June 2024 (UTC)