User talk:Jaguar/Archive 31

Archive 25

←

Archive 29

Archive 30

Archive 31

Yes. I'm being serious.

You made several date and spelling changes to the article three days ago. This goes against both WP:DATERET and WP:RETAIN. And instead of attempting to obtain a consenus for these changes on the talk page, you blindly reverted the restoration of the previous date and spelling formats. Experianced editors should know the guidelines and rules when editing Wikipedia. I don't know why you are acting like this. You should know better.--JOJ ^Hutton 14:00, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

You reverted thirteen of my edits to the article, including various copyedits, new content to the technical specifications section and the addition of five new images. The date formats were inconsistent. I was going to make a start to bringing the article to GA, my first steps were to clean up the structure. I'm astounded that you reverted literally everything. ♦ jaguar 14:11, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

I reverted literally everthing because your edits were massive and against the guidelines. You obtained no cosensus for this massive change in date format and spelling. I'm not sure why you are doing this, but it is very disruptive. You should go back and fix your errors in judgement,--JOJ ^Hutton 14:15, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Which guidelines, pray tell? ♦ jaguar 14:20, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

The very two I JUST linked in my previous comment.--JOJ ^Hutton 14:29, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

I'm losing brain cells here, Joj. Please let me get on with editing. ♦ jaguar 14:32, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Why are you stalling? Your edits were against the guidelines. Are you denying that?--JOJ ^Hutton 14:39, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) Jojhutton, next time, use a script to fix the RETAIN issues. You reverted massive improvements that Jaguar was making, which is not constructive and the way edit wars start. JOEBRO64 18:23, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

I’m not an expert. It’s up to each editor to follow the guidelines. These in appropriate edits should never have been hidden into other edits. You can’t defend the indefensible.201.170.77.145 (talk) 18:27, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Now in Portuguese

Rare Replay lives on: pt:Usuário:GhostP./Rare Replay czar 08:31, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Our valiant project is now transatlantic! I would have gave him a hand with Solar Jetman had I known... ♦ jaguar 23:51, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Super Mario Galaxy

Your input would be of value on the talk page for Super Mario Galaxy, where I have raised a discussion regarding the inclusion of "U R MR GAY" with reliable sources. As you have made significant contributions to the article, your perspective seems relevant. Waxworker (talk) 16:51, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Cleaning up Special:WantedTemplates

Hi, due to quirks in the way that Wikipedia parses javascript pages, curly braces are parsed as templates, unless they are inside of <nowiki>...</nowiki>, <pre>...</pre>, <syntaxhighlight>...</syntaxhighlight> ... As a result of this, your script page, User:Jaguar/vector.js, is generating links in Special:WantedTemplates (in particular links to Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:"+"subst:Currentdate"+"). Recently, an interface editor attempted to fix this by adding <nowiki> at the top and </nowiki> at the bottom of your script page. This didn't work because you already have <nowiki>...</nowiki> on that page. It would be great if you could add <syntaxhighlight>...</syntaxhighlight> tags (you don't have these) at the top and bottom of your page like this which will prevent your page from generating links in Special:WantedTemplates. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:50, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Done. Do feel free to change anything ― coding isn't my forte, I'm afraid. ♦ jaguar 23:46, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chidden

The article Chidden has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

"Hamlet" is four or five homes by each other. No sources, notability not established with substantive sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92^Talk 22:05, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured topic removal candidates/Wipeout/archive1

Letting you know I started a review of the Wipeout topic here. GamerPro64 01:42, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks GP. ♦ jaguar 16:52, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

User:Jaguar/vector.js

Thanks for trying to fix the problem with this edit. Unfortunately it didn't work because of the excess tab spacing inside of the closing tag. Also, to avoid breaking the javascript, there needs to be // before the tags. So, it would be great if you could fix it like this. Thanks again! Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:55, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Alternative, this also works notice that the nowiki tags are below the nowiki tags at the top of the page. Thanks! Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:56, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Falklands '82 question

I think this is for you? Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:35, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for that. ♦ jaguar 19:24, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Happy First Edit Day, Jaguar, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk, FAQ, contribs) 20:24, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

TWELVE YEARS!?!? I didn't realise! Oh my days I'm getting old!! ♦ jaguar 20:37, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Seven years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:13, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Wipeout Omega Collection

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Wipeout Omega Collection you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Haleth -- Haleth (talk) 02:01, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Star Fox gameplay.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Star Fox gameplay.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Wipeout Omega Collection

The article Wipeout Omega Collection you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Wipeout Omega Collection for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Haleth -- Haleth (talk) 01:21, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Wipeout Omega Collection

The article Wipeout Omega Collection you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Wipeout Omega Collection for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Haleth -- Haleth (talk) 01:41, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

GAN Backlog Drive - July 2021

Good article nominations | July 2021 Backlog Drive
July 2021 Backlog Drive: This Thursday, July 1, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number, length, and age, of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

GANs

Hi Jaguar. I'm not sure how active you are nowadays but I have two GANs on the go if you're interested in reviewing them. They are Hoodoo Mountain and Mount Price. Volcanoguy 11:50, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi Volcanoguy. I'm not as active as before but I'll give them a go. They look well written. ♦ jaguar 15:30, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Hoodoo Mountain is an FAC if you would like to review it. Volcanoguy 15:52, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

"Chairwoman"

Is there a provision of the MOS that says "chairwoman" or "chairman" is preferable to "chair"? I see you are altering instances of "chair" to include gendered terms (as on Juanita Maxwell Phillips), but I don't understand why. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 20:58, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi AleatoryPonderings. There probably isn't anything set in stone in the MOS per se but in MOS:IDINFO there is a statement regarding gendered nouns: "gendered nouns (for example "man/woman", "waiter/waitress", "chairman/chairwoman""). It is the proper vernacular at the end of the day ― 'chairman' has always been the commonly used noun. ♦ jaguar 22:43, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

I opened a discussion about this at Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style#"Chair"_v_"chairwoman". AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 23:17, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Paradoxes

Concerning the general topic of gender neutral, you'll find (as I have months ago) that many who preach tolerance, tend to practice intolerance. Quite the paradox. GoodDay (talk) 20:26, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

I found that out years ago sadly. This has always plagued Wikipedia. This project is honestly doomed with the majority of people who dominate it are simply unable to think or tolerate. ♦ jaguar 20:28, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!

Greetings,

It is already past the middle of the contest and we are really excited about the Months of African Contest 2021 achievements so far! We want to extend our sincere gratitude for the time and energy you have invested. If you have not yet participated in the contest, it is not too late to do it. Please list your username as a participant on the contest’s main page.

Please remember to list the articles you have improved or created on the article achievements' section of the contest page so they can be tracked. In order to win prizes, be sure to also list your article in the users by articles. Please note that your articles must be present in both the article achievement section on the main contest page, as well as on the Users By Articles page for you to qualify for a prize.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

• Overall winner
  • 1st - $500
  • 2nd - $200
  • 3rd - $100
• Diversity winner - $100
• Gender-gap filler - $100
• Language Winners - up to $100*

Thank you once again for your valued participation! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 18:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Good Job!

		The Good Jb! Award
		I feel you deserve some attention, especially for the unreasonably high amount of GA reviews. How many do you have at this point? 700-something? Hold on... 1, 2, 3, shshsmmssh, 20, 21, mhsrmhsh 70 71 72 mrmrmsmrhs 200 201 202 shsmrmsr Panini!🥪 12:32, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank you Panini LOL! 740 adds up over the years. I'll be damned if that number somehow got to 1000. ♦ jaguar 13:42, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Surrey articles for GA review

Hi @Jaguar:
Hope all is well. You very kindly reviewed Dorking for WP:GA back in February and Stane Street (Chichester) at the end of last year. I wondered if you would be willing to look at another couple of Surrey articles please? I nominated Weybridge about six weeks ago and Leatherhead at WP:GAN yesterday, but they have not yet been picked up for review. I know that you are winding down your Wikipedia work before starting a new job in January, but if you do have any time to look at either article, that would be fantastic. (I am also hoping to nominate Haslemere in a week or so's time.) I do completely understand if you are too busy.
Thanks and best wishes Mertbiol (talk) 12:59, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi Mertbiol, I've taken up the reviews and should hopefully get to them in a day or two. I never mind reviewing local towns! Haslemere would be good. It's a shame that I'm having to wind down Wikipedia work as I had many grand plans for Hampshire towns... ♦ jaguar 00:10, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Thanks @Jaguar: This is very kind of you. I look forward to your reviews! Best wishes Mertbiol (talk) 06:37, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi @Jaguar: Just a quick note to let you know that I have nominated the Haslemere article for WP:GA status. If you're able to review it, that would be fantastic, but please don't worry if you are too busy. Thanks and best wishes Mertbiol (talk) 10:29, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Hello Jaguar: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice if it's occurring in your area of the world, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:15, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Happy Holidays!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2022!

Hello Jaguar, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2022. Happy editing, JOEBRO64 16:48, 25 December 2021 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

GAN Backlog Drive – January 2022

Good article nominations | January 2022 Backlog Drive
January 2022 Backlog Drive: On New Year's Day, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage.
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).

Orphaned non-free image File:Crash Bandicoot gameplay 1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Crash Bandicoot gameplay 1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

I hate to do this to you, but...

I'll cut the chit-chat. I put up a peer review and would appreciate some comments if you have any. If you do, I super-duper-double-pinky promise that I'll review your future PlayStation 2 FAC if you plan on it taking it that far. Panini!^🥪 15:39, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

@Panini!: I'll leave some comments hopefully tonight. The article looks to be in good shape as it is. ♦ jaguar 11:34, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Promotion of PlayStation (console)

Congratulations, Jaguar! The article you nominated, PlayStation (console), has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best articles on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured article. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Gog the Mild (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:06, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/PlayStation (console)/archive1

I've left some comments on the above nomination. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 00:46, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Thank you Snuggums! I will get to your comments hopefully tonight. Been very busy lately. ♦ jaguar 11:34, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Congrats on the successful nomination! SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 23:04, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Thanks SNUGGUMS! PlayStation 2 next... maybe. But definitely not 3, or 5. ♦ jaguar 23:08, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Not a problem :) SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 01:00, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:PlayStation colour logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:PlayStation colour logo.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Newfiebluejay (talk) 22:21, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Paper Mario: Color Splash/archive1

Hey, Jaguar! I hate to bring you out of the Color Splash peer review water just to dunk you into the Color Splash FAC ocean, but the nomination is close to being archived due to inactivity. I would really appreciate it if you could leave comments. Panini! • 🥪 22:44, 26 March 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Like I'm Gonna Lose You/archive1

Hi Jaguar! I just wanted to let you know that "Like I'm Gonna Lose You", which you reviewed against the good article criteria twice in 2016, is a current featured article candidate. Since you must have a level of familiarity with the article now I thought I would leave a head's up :) --NØ 06:11, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!

You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Review a article for Good Article

Hi Jaguar Can you please review the article Mammootty for a Good Article. I have gone through the article and I didn't feel any errors are there. Could you please have a review on it and if any changes needed i will try my level best for changing the errors.Paavamjinn (talk) 20:57, 22 April 2022 (UTC)

@Paavamjinn: I'm sorry, I haven't been on Wikipedia for quite a while. I would have taken the review if I was active last month. I see it now undergoing review, but let me know if you have any future GANs. ♦ jaguar 19:21, 22 May 2022 (UTC)

Jaguar Sure will get in touch with you for future GANs.Paavamjinn (talk) 05:04, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Precious anniversary

Precious

Seven years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:44, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

Wishing Jaguar a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee!   Chris Troutman (talk) 20:31, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Wipeout 2048 scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 12 August 2022. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 12, 2022, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/August 2022. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 18:08, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Title (EP)/archive1

Hey Jaguar! Thanks a lot for your input at the nomination for "Like I'm Gonna Lose You". I have another active Trainor FAC right now that is (relatively) failing to get attention, if you might be able to take a look. Would love to return the favor when (if?) you will nominate something one day!--NØ 16:27, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi just wanted to leave another heads-up about this. If this passes before the 31st it will help me keep a monthly streak going :)--NØ 11:51, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Thanks for being a friendly figure on here all these years. Hope you get well soon and this kitten helps!

NØ 10:44, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

wipeout 2048

hello, Jaguar! i had a question regarding this article and the associated blurb. do you have any reliable sources available for the european and north american release dates mentioned in the blurb and article infobox? they are currently mentioned in the article without a citation, so i am unsure what sources were used to obtain these dates. this playstation.com source suggests that the north american release date occurred a week earlier than stated in the article. (according to the vita article, this earlier date is the same as the vita's north american launch date.) also, this gamefaqs source states that the release date for the game in the playstation store was the same for both the european and north american markets. (i admittedly have a harder time believing this source, since if it were accurate, then europeans were apparently able to buy the game a week before they were able to buy the console.) dying (talk) 20:49, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi Dying, sorry for the late response. It is not a requirement for video game release dates to be sourced, as many of them have been lost to the depths of time and can only be found via aggregate sources. I've added reliable sources for the release dates in the article anyway, 22 Feb for Europe/NA, and 19 Jan for Japan. ♦ jaguar 10:30, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

thanks for getting back to me, Jaguar. i'm admittedly not that worried about whether the dates are sourced in the article or not; my worry is that one of the dates may be incorrect, and is about to be featured on the main page. i do appreciate the addition of sources for the european and japanese release dates. however, if i'm not mistaken, the eurogamer source mentions "the game's release in Europe on February 22", but states nothing about its release date in north america. the playstation.com source i linked above appears to be pretty solid, and most other sources i have come across either report the same date or are perhaps one or two days off, so i remain concerned that the north american release date currently mentioned in the blurb is still incorrect. dying (talk) 11:44, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Thank you today for the article! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:19, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Here's to a job well done. JOEBRO64 12:24, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Half Barnstar Get!

		The Half Barnstar
		I must congratulate you and TheJoebro64 for your extraordinary efforts getting Donkey Kong Country to Featured status. To see a title that carried such significant influence (including on one particular series I hold near and dear) join those ranks is a great personal joy and absolutely requires my thanks. Cat's Tuxedo (talk) 03:49, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Donkey Kong Country FAC

Just saw this passed and wanted to say well done! SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 12:07, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Thank you, SNUGGUMS! Honestly it was mostly through Joe's tireless efforts that the article saw the light of day. A large part of me wants to shirk from taking any credit! ♦ jaguar 21:48, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

My pleasure, and don't sell yourself short; you also helped get it to a state worthy of being promoted by previously working this up to GA level. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 23:31, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

'Black Twitter'

Please can you consult Talk:Reactions to the death of Elizabeth II section on "Black Twitter" and state your opinion on its removal. JamesLewisBedford01 (talk) 17:28, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Source review

Hi Jaguar, hope you're doing well. I was wondering whether you'd be able to conduct a source review for Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Monaco: What's Yours Is Mine/archive2. No worries if you're busy, though. Kind regards, Anarchyte (talk) 14:14, 15 September 2022 (UTC)

Woking

Hi @Jaguar: Hope you are well. I'm not sure if you're checking Wikipedia at the moment, but I wanted to ask if you would be willing to review yet another article. I nominated Woking at WP:GAN over three months ago, but it has not yet been picked up. I wondered if you would be able to review it please? It would be great to get another WP:Surrey article up to GA status. Thanks and best wishes Mertbiol (talk) 17:39, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

editnotices

Jaguar, i checked your recent contributions to see if you have had a chance to address my comment above, and was surprised to see that you had created 18 new editnotices, all apparently stating that their associated article is written in british english. were some of these created in error? for example, you created an editnotice for the namibia article, even though it appears to be written in south african english, and another for the north korea article, even though it appears to be written in u.s. english. dying (talk) 03:31, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello Dying, and apologies for the late reply as I have been away from Wikipedia for a while. The release dates for Wipeout 2048 were amended by another user, I believe. I have changed Namibia's editnotice to South African English. I do not know why the North Korea article was recently changed to American English, since the country teaches and uses British English. I've left it for now, but will delete it if there's pushback. ♦ jaguar 21:47, 30 August 2022 (UTC)

how recent was this change? i tried searching through the last few years of the article's history for the word "labour", but was unable to find anything. admittedly, i had used a binary search, so i could have missed something. however, if the article had been using british english recently for a notable amount of time, i would have assumed that my search would have been able to pick up something. it's possible that i performed my search incorrectly, though i figured that it would be easier to simply ask you when the change occurred. dying (talk) 12:37, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

also, thanks for mentioning the update on the wipeout 2048 article. i have contacted the editor, who has since helped me resolve the issue. dying (talk) 22:07, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Jaguar, i recently realized that it might be easier to determine when the north korea article last used british english by looking at your edits to the article, since that would likely point to when you were most familiar with it. i was surprised to see that you had only made two edits: you first changed the page to use british english via a script, and then reverted the page later that day to the version immediately before you used the script. alas, it did not take me long after that to discover that others editors have previously addressed similar issues on your talk page, and that you have been brought to ani over changing articles to use british english before. i had only been trying to be helpful, in case you had a malfunctioning script or something and were unaware, but now i see that this issue is far more involved than i had initially expected.

i have no interest in pursuing this matter any further, as i have no beef with you and would rather you return to bringing articles up to featured status. at the same time, i think dropping this would be a breach of implicit responsibility on my part, as this appears to be a clear misuse of your template editor bit. so, i am pinging Dennis Brown, an active administrator who weighed in significantly during your ani case; xaosflux, the administrator who initially granted you the template editor bit; and Primefac, the administrator who renewed the bit for you. they obviously have far more experience with this sort of thing than i do, and i am washing my hands of this mess.

i do hope that you are able to avoid being disruptive in this manner in the future, as i had enjoyed reading your featured article, and would be glad to see more productive work from you. dying (talk) 04:52, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Aarhus

Aarhus has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 18:18, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Agriculture in Wales

Agriculture in Wales has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 21:12, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

You're missed

Miss seeing you about and working on Hampshire villages! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:04, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Eight years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:24, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Unfortunately he's no longer active, and quiet by email too. Who is going to expand all of those crappy Hampshire village stubs now! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:48, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

I am happy that Jaguar was busy in August and September last year, and hope for more. 10 edits to article space is all I need for someone to be called active ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:55, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Mark Reed

On many articles about Personal Software Services games, you have reviews from Computer Gamer credited to someone named Mark Reed. I can't find this person actually named anywhere in the magazine, most of the reviews are anonymous or credited to initials that don't match Mark Reed (like "A.H."). Where did you get this name from? Ringtail Raider (talk) 16:32, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Charles III requested move discussion

There is a new requested move discussion in progress for the Charles III article. Since you participated in the previous discussion, I thought you might like to know about this one. Cheers. Rreagan007 (talk) 06:10, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Gran Turismo 3 screenshot.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gran Turismo 3 screenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello Jaguar! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:18, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Andy Murray

Andy Murray has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 07:05, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Yes

September songs

my story today

yes, you were missed -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:18, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Thank you, Gerda! Was quite amusing seeing my name on the missing list. Shame there was no cash reward for my safe return. It feels like a decade since I last edited, so it's going to take some getting used to. I hope you are keeping well. ♦ jaguar 21:21, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

I don't watch every move on the missing list ;) - good to see you again! If you click on the songs you see how well I'm doing privately, and if you click to the story you can read something I picked related to the day, today - for Michaelmas - The Company of Heaven, with many meanings. I run a project of expanding all psalms articles (to be completed this year), and another of improving articles of those in our deaths list, in good cases for an appearance on the Main page. That will never be completed, although I focus on those with sources in German that I can read and others don't, and to music that I love. I dropped out of DYK, doing only what I feel has to be known, - with my own stories instead. How about you? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:34, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

I'm pleased to hear that, Gerda, and that you're still active and doing well. I wish you luck with the psalms, I'll have a look at them later. I've had a turbulent year if I'm honest, but Wikipedia might take my mind off things. I enjoyed writing FAs, and giving forgotten topics the attention they deserve. ♦ jaguar 21:58, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Great to see you back and that you're still alive! ;-) ♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:52, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

@Dr. Blofeld: check your emails!! ♦ jaguar 12:56, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Welcome back!

@Jaguar: Woohoo!!!!! Great to see you again!!!!!!! 123957a (talk) 19:22, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

@123957a: thank you - I'm relieved some are happy! ♦ jaguar 19:50, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

@Jaguar: You're welcome! 123957a (talk) 21:20, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Some stroopwafels for you!

Glad to see you back :) The Herald (Benison) (talk) 22:46, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

Thank you Benison! It is good to hear from you too, I hope you're well. ♦ jaguar 11:49, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Wickham Common for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wickham Common is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wickham Common until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

FOARP (talk) 10:16, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Editnotices/Page/World War I

Template:Editnotices/Page/World War I has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Interstellarity (talk) 12:02, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Pegasus Bridge (video game)

Pegasus Bridge (video game) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 06:40, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

Tseax Cone GAN

Hi Jaguar, I hope you're doing well. Would you be interested in reviewing Tseax Cone for GA? Volcanoguy 04:30, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Seasons Greetings!

Hello there, thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia! Wishing you a Very Merry Christmas and here's to a happy and productive 2024! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:12, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Seasonal greetings!!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2024!

Hello Jaguar, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2024. Happy editing, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:27, 25 December 2023 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 05:27, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of ZX Spectrum

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article ZX Spectrum you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of PresN -- PresN (talk) 23:44, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Battle of B-R5RB

Battle of B-R5RB has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:47, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

TFA for PlayStation (console)?

I've got this listed as the April 30 TFA. No need to do anything if this works for you. Let me know if there's anything I can do. (I see one "self-published source" tag on a YouTube citation ... thoughts?) - Dank (push to talk) 19:57, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Now on April 3. - Dank (push to talk) 15:37, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rayman 2 soundtrack 1.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rayman 2 soundtrack 1.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Edziza Formation

Hi Jaguar, I just want to let you know that I have also nominated Edziza Formation for GA. Sorry I didn't mention it in my email to you but this was article was just created. Volcanoguy 15:28, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

GA

Greetings ! I would like to try and bring my first article to GA and I was wondering if you could help me. The article in question is Wii Sports Resort. It would basically consist of you helping me step-by-step. I am asking since you seem to have lot of experience with GA with 67 good articles. Maxime12346 (talk) 11:28, 8 April 2024 (UTC)

TFA

story · music · places

Today's TFA, Felix M. Warburg House, was written by Vami_IV and Epicgenius, introduced: "This article is about another of the great houses that once lined Fifth Avenue in New York. Specifically, this is the mansion of Felix M. Warburg, a Jewish financier who ignored fears of anti-Semitic reprisal to his decided to build himself a big Gothic manor in the middle of New York City. Although the Warburgs no longer remain, their legacy does: the museum is now the home of the Jewish Museum (Manhattan) and the building largely survives as they left it. It's a beautiful building and I hope you will all enjoy it."! - in memory -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:59, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Today's story mentions a concert I loved to hear and a piece I loved to sing in choir, 150 years old OTD. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:52, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Thank you Gerda. I hope you are well. ♦ JAGUAR  15:04, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

Check out places and music, and you'll see: yes! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:08, 22 May 2024 (UTC)

DYK for ZX Spectrum

On 12 June 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article ZX Spectrum, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the ZX Spectrum (pictured) is one of the best-selling British computers of all time? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/ZX Spectrum. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, ZX Spectrum), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:03, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 25,802 views (1,075.1 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of June 2024 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Historical background of the 2014 pro-Russian unrest in Ukraine

Historical background of the 2014 pro-Russian unrest in Ukraine has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Rsk6400 (talk) 13:38, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society

Dear Jaguar/Archive 31,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more. ​

Best regards, The Herald (Benison) (talk) 11:31, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

— The Herald (Benison) (talk) 11:31, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

I can't believe it! I have been flummoxed with the paradox of being old without being old! ♦ JAGUAR  18:34, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious

Nine years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:39, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Nouakchott

Nouakchott has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:09, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jumping Flash! 2 - Baron Aloha.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jumping Flash! 2 - Baron Aloha.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:14, 7 October 2024 (UTC)