Farooqahmadbhat, you are invited to the Teahouse!Edit

 

Hi Farooqahmadbhat! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Gestrid (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

Welcome to the Teahouse!Edit

  Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia.

Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges

from: Knightrises10

Your submission at Articles for creation: Devepora has been acceptedEdit

Devepora, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (utc) 10:28, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Junaid Azim Mattu (November 12)Edit

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Legacypac (talk) 05:54, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bufliaz has been acceptedEdit

Bufliaz, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 06:03, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mehak Zubair (November 12)Edit

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Legacypac (talk) 06:04, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Peer Ki Gali has a new commentEdit

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Peer Ki Gali. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 06:09, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:Tina DabiEdit

  Draft:Tina Dabi, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Tina Dabi and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Tina Dabi during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 06:56, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Requesting for administrators attention - I am looking for helpEdit

The user Legacypac (talk) is the suspected user on Wikipedia who decline and object quality and notable pages. Please take appropriate action against the said user.

The following article that Legacypac (talk) has declined:

  • If you have any legitimate reasons for objecting to Legacypac's declines of your submissions then you need to say what those reasons are, not just say that he is a "suspected user" (whatever that is supposed to mean). From my checks of a few of the drafts it seems that he has actually been very generous to you, for example simply advising you to reword a draft instead of tagging it for speedy deletion as a copyright infringement, raising a discussion on whether to delete another draft rather than tagging it for speedy deletion as spam and as re-creation of content deleted at an earlier deletion discussion, as many editors would have done. His handling of your drafts seems absolutely fine, from what I have seen of them. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:11, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

This user is on my talkpage and the AfC help desk complaining. Thanks User:JamesBWatson Legacypac (talk) 16:35, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Junaid Azim Mattu (November 12)Edit

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 15:25, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peer Ki Gali has been acceptedEdit

Peer Ki Gali, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 15:56, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Herman (Village) has been acceptedEdit

Herman (Village), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (utc) 16:32, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Peer Ki Gali moved to draftspaceEdit

An article you recently created, Peer Ki Gali, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 TT me 16:16, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peer Ki Gali has been acceptedEdit

Peer Ki Gali, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 05:34, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reshnagri has been acceptedEdit

Reshnagri, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (utc) 10:28, 18 November 2018 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Namda has a new commentEdit

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Namda. Thanks! AngusWOOF (barksniff) 05:44, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kotranka has been acceptedEdit

Kotranka, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (utc) 16:59, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chandimarh has been acceptedEdit

Chandimarh, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 16:18, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yaripora has been acceptedEdit

Yaripora, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

JC7V (talk) 19:37, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Peer Ki GaliEdit

Hello Farooq, thank you very much for creating the Peer Ki Gali page. I have corrected the coordinates to the ones shown on Google maps. Can you please double check that it is correct? Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 09:05, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

@Kautilya3: This is a matter of concern that you have moved Peer Ki Gali to Pir Panjal Pass" without getting involved in article research. In Fact, you have disrupted the current version which needs administrator's intervention. The Pir Panjal Range should be merged to "Pir Panjal Pass" but not "Peer Ki Gali". The 'pir panjal pass' represents a group of mountains while 'peer ki gali' represents a tourist spot. (Farooqahmadbhat (talk) 09:15, 23 November 2018 (UTC))

Moreover, sources said, there is no "Pir panjal Pass" But "Peer Ki Gali". The said user (Kautilya3 (talk)) has renamed the article Peer Ki Gali to Pir Panjal Pass without adding sources that could indicate the "peer ki gali" is the "Pir panjal pass". (Farooqahmadbhat (talk) 09:15, 23 November 2018 (UTC))

That is strange. The Pir Panjal Range says "The Pir Panjal Pass (also called Peer Ki Gali)", and you have added yesterday, a link to the new page without making any correction to the information. Are you now saying that "Pir Panjal Pass" and "Peer Ki Gali" are different places? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 18:28, 23 November 2018 (UTC)
Sir, I was looking for the sources that could indicate "Peer Ki Gali" is also known as "Pir Panjal Pass" and i failed to gather the information from reliable sources. Since, you moved "Peer Ki Gali" to "Pir Panjal Pass", I tried a lot to collect the information about your changes and later, i realized that "Peer Ki Gali" and "Pir Panjal Pass" are not same geographically. I am surprised, that a senior user like you moved the page without supplying variable sources. Moreover, the mentioned phrase on Pir Panjal Range "The Pir Panjal Pass (also called Peer Ki Gali)" is not added by me... I have only linked "Peer Ki Gali" to the said page and the rest of words ("The Pir Panjal Pass (also called" ____) were added by another user. (Farooqahmadbhat (talk) 18:36, 23 November 2018 (UTC))
For native names, English language sources may be hard to get. We do depend on people with local knowledge to add such information without asking for sources. For Kashmir especially, good quality information is very hard to get.
Further, if you bothered to click on the Google maps link I gave you yesterday, you would have noticed that it is showing both at the same place.
Anyway, I have now added a reliable source. So this controversy is now resolved. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 07:10, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

By the way, the shrine that you have labelled as that of Nund Rishi, has been labelled on Google maps as a shrine for Sheikh Ahmed Karim. You might want to investigate further. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 09:43, 24 November 2018 (UTC)

I have investigated each and every part of Pir Panjal Pass but i am still in doubt whether it should be Peer Ki Gali or Pir Panjal Pass. The truth is; you know better than me and i feel helpless and tired while searching for the sources here and there. Anyway, thanks for showing your interest in PKG or PPP. (Farooqahmadbhat (talk) 12:00, 24 November 2018 (UTC))

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chitragam has been acceptedEdit

Chitragam, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (utc) 16:34, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hirpora has been acceptedEdit

Hirpora, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (utc) 16:55, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Khadermoh has been acceptedEdit

Khadermoh, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (utc) 15:17, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tukroo has been acceptedEdit

Tukroo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (utc) 15:36, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kalampora has been acceptedEdit

Kalampora, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (utc) 15:40, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amshipora has been acceptedEdit

Amshipora, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (utc) 16:54, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanger Wani has been acceptedEdit

Sanger Wani, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 22:45, 27 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kashmiri handicrafts has been acceptedEdit

Kashmiri handicrafts, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 05:50, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

  The India Star
Farooqahmadbhat, I award you The India Star for all your hard work in WikiProject India-related articles, especially your recent creation of an article about Kashmiri handicrafts. Keep up the good work! You are making a difference here! With regards, AnupamTalk 08:23, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Panzer, Shopian has been acceptedEdit

Panzer, Shopian, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

JC7V (talk) 03:34, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gulistan, Baramulla has been acceptedEdit

Gulistan, Baramulla, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (utc) 16:00, 29 November 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Noori ChambEdit

  Hello! Your submission of Noori Chamb at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:27, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Siar Baba Waterfall has been acceptedEdit

Siar Baba Waterfall, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (utc) 15:23, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yaadon Ka Idiot Box has been acceptedEdit

Yaadon Ka Idiot Box, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Legacypac (talk) 15:29, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 3Edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yaadon Ka Idiot Box, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mint (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shitlu has been acceptedEdit

Shitlu, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (utc) 16:56, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karimabad, Pulwama has been acceptedEdit

Karimabad, Pulwama, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SemiHypercube 18:17, 4 December 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dool, Kishtwar has been acceptedEdit

Dool, Kishtwar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SemiHypercube 18:19, 4 December 2018 (UTC)


Re: Draft:Kashmir Administrative ServiceEdit

Hello Farooqahmadbhat I have added projects India, to your article. You may wish to join them, check their to-do, and meet new people with interest in these topics. Cheers, --Gryllida (talk) 06:50, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Where did you take the information from? It would be great to include it as sources for the article. Please let me know if you need help. ( To reply click 'edit' next to this section, and add your reply at the end. ) Gryllida (talk) 06:50, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

@Gryllida: Sir, I am working........... I am in process of completing the topic and then i'll supply all the possible and verified sources... Thank you so much... I feel very happy to see the friendly chartered wiki users like you... In fact, people like you, are the foundation of Wikipedia Farooqahmadbhat (talk) 07:00, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kashmir Administrative Service has been acceptedEdit

Kashmir Administrative Service, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 14:20, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!Edit

  The Original Barnstar
For your excellent work on starting articles such as Kashmiri handicrafts, Peer Ki Gali and Kashmir Administrative Service. (The Original Barnstar, the first on Wikipedia, is given to recognize particularly fine contributions to Wikipedia, to let people know that their hard work is seen and appreciated.) signed, DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 19:36, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jammu and Kashmir Public Service Commission has been acceptedEdit

Jammu and Kashmir Public Service Commission, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (utc) 12:26, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer grantedEdit

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

TonyBallioni (talk) 16:58, 10 December 2018 (UTC)

Regarding votingEdit

Please mention your vote in AfD (as its necessary), in bold, example as: Keep, Delete or Comment.(Info:WP:AFDFORMAT)
--Gpkp (utc) 16:25, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jammu and Kashmir State Vigilance Commission has been acceptedEdit

Jammu and Kashmir State Vigilance Commission, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (utc) 16:49, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

KikoRikiEdit

Hi Farooqahmadbhat!

I am updating KikoRiki's wiki info on behalf of the KikoRiki brand owner.

The copyright owners wanted to update the info that was on the wiki because it's very outdated and negatively impacting the brand. I have a more updates to follow. Please kindly apply the update that I will submit.


Thanks, Fununionriki — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fununionriki (talkcontribs) 07:35, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) In that case, you need to read and follow the instructions at WP:COI. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 08:17, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
Feel free to make constructive changes at any time. Earlier, i reverted the latest changes made by "Fununionriki" because the edits were not cited. Farooqahmadbhat (talk) 08:24, 13 December 2018 (UTC)

You are wrong! Scotland is in Great Britain even children know it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by United10000 (talkcontribs) 05:04, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation! see, WP:PTOPIC

Tech News: 2018-51Edit

20:35, 17 December 2018 (UTC)

TalkbackEdit

Hello, Farooqahmadbhat. You have new messages at Template:Did you know nominations/Aadil Gurezi.
Message added 13:39, 22 December 2018 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 13:39, 22 December 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Dool, Kishtwar) has been reviewed!Edit

Thanks for creating Dool, Kishtwar.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Thanks for writing it, it would be great if you could add a source for that it's largest village by area.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|1997kB}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

‐‐1997kB (talk) 05:23, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Speedy taggingEdit

You tagged the above two articles as A7 and put comments in the article. This is disruptive. If you want to comment on your A7, then do so on the article's Talk page. Even then, generally A7s don't require comments by the tagger; the issue should be obvious on its face. For example, the fact that a source returns a 404 is irrelevant to a speedy tag as for an article to survive a7, it requires only significant credible claims, whether they are sourced or not. An article can survive A7 with zero sources. I don't think you're experienced enough to tag articles for speedy deletion; I suggest you stop.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:05, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

@Bbb23: With due respect, my intention was not making disruptive edits. In fact, I thought it might help admins to gather the more information about the speedy tagged articles. Now, I came to know that adding comments in A7 articles is disruptive. Thanks a lot. Sir, there are many more articles which needs to be deleted under A7 and G11. If you give me one more chance to tag the articles for speedy deletion, it may help Wikipedia to remove the spam articles. I will be careful in future while tagging the articles. Thanks Farooqahmadbhat (talk) 15:27, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
I have once again removed your speedy template the article has a clear claim of notability as "the oldest department store in the State of Penang". Theroadislong (talk) 18:56, 23 December 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Ignite Media GroupEdit

Hello Farooqahmadbhat, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Ignite Media Group, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not blatantly vandalism or a hoax. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. -- Amanda (aka DQ) 13:33, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

@DeltaQuad: Sir, thanks for letting me know. I have a question. If G3 is not suitable for the said article, then I think the page deserves G11. The article has been created 9 years ago and still it has not been improved because the constructive sources are not available. Farooqahmadbhat (talk) 13:50, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
A minor point, you should note that Amanda/DeltaQuad is a female admin, and "Sir" is probably not appropriate Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:33, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
(talk page stalker), @Farooqahmadbhat: I suggest using gender neutral terms as needed when talking to users on Wikipedia whose gender you aren't too sure about. Although I don't think it is a policy anywhere, it is still a small point that needs to be considered in general day to day interactions. For further reading see Wikipedia:Gender-neutral language in Wikipedia policies, Singular they, Wikipedia:Gender-neutral language. (I know you are currently blocked, but when and IF you are unblocked, this is something to consider otherwise also if not already considered.) I know I had a little bit of confusion in trying to understand this early on in Wikipedia. Regards. DiplomatTesterMan (talk) 09:35, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
I apologize for using the gender terms as i was not aware of WP:GNLPOLICY. Farooqahmadbhat (talk) 12:33, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

December 2018Edit

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 14:12, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
 
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Farooqahmadbhat (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The reasons for which I have been blocked are baseless. I have never used multiple accounts but sometimes I access Wikipedia through vpn from the same account because we are facing continuous shutdown of internet. Evidences here Farooqahmadbhat (talk) 14:28, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

The blocking admin has responded w/o unblocking. See Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks#Checkuser and Oversight blocks. It's been I guess 56 days. Please follow the unblock instructions from Swarm to appeal to ArbCom. arbcom-en@wikimedia.org Dlohcierekim (talk) 15:34, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

The user "Bbb23" is following his personal opinions rather than being a sincere wikipedian. I would like to check the evidences collected by Checkuser "Bbb23" for blocking my account. The checkuser claims that i have multiple account or have abused multiple accounts. His claim is completely baseless and untrue based on his mode. His admin rights should be revoked after investigating the matter. Farooqahmadbhat (talk) 17:22, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

You aren't at all helping your case here. Bbb23 is one of our best administrators, and checkuser evidence is not "baseless", nor a matter of personal opinion. I would try another methodology than this, because I'll faint in shock if another administrator unblocks you based on that particular plea. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 18:13, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
I'm still hoping that an admin will definitely review my account activities once again (including IP) rather than speaking Bbb23's language. Since Bbb23 have removed help template from my talk page, I'll find every possible way to re-check my account by other responsible editors. Thanks Farooqahmadbhat (talk) 19:02, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
Bbb23 wasn't hiding your request from administrators. You have an open unblock request, that is all you need, and any administrator who is willing to look at unblock requests will see it. Therefore the "Administrator attention" template was redundant, that's all. I'd like to see you unblocked as you've created several nice articles, and ultimately that's what Wikipedia is about, but as I said above your methodology is inappropriate. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 19:22, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
If this is the case of my wrong methodology, then a warning message would be sufficient. Farooqahmadbhat (talk) 19:32, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
I have struck parts where I was accusing Bbb23 because I just spent some time reading WP:CHECKUSER and realised Bbb23 must have been doing what they felt right. I am blocked for a week now and I still don't know what accounts I used for socking. Farooqahmadbhat (talk) 15:42, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Farooqahmadbhat (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #23651 was submitted on Dec 24, 2018 19:43:28. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 19:43, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

  • Separate to my emailing ArbCom, the reviewing admin at UTRS has requested a CheckUser at that end as well. So, it will be looked in to if it hasn't already.  Swarm  {talk}  23:56, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

26 days have been passed and no action have been taken so far. If i have been blocked for editing habits or contributions then kindly have a look at diff1 diff2 and diff3 too. Does that mean all these similar adits have been done by me? Please reconsider my block for the sake of God. Farooqahmadbhat (talk) 07:29, 20 January 2019 (UTC)}}

Maybe I should better wait till ArbCom looks into this. Farooqahmadbhat (talk) 18:15, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Tech News: 2019-02Edit

18:30, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Tech News: 2019-03Edit