JC7V7DC5768

This user tries to do the right thing. If they make a mistake, please let them know.

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

Your GA nomination of Xbox 360

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Xbox 360 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 00:00, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Sudanese protests (2018)

Why did you delete this, instead of adding a few references? I am confusion. For info, I asked @Ammarpad: about this page on their RfA. It is not meant as a hostile question for either of you. SashiRolls ^{t · c} 00:25, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Irene Keng

Thanks for your mail regarding Irene Keng, I think this is probably a borderline case for WP:NACTOR. Maybe nominate it and see what the community thinks. Personally, it's one of the AfDs that I probably wouldn't !vote either way on. --woodensuperman 09:04, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Draft Crystal Lagoons

Hello @JC7V7DC5768 You left a message saying the references used in the Crystal Lagoons draft are not up to Wikipedia standard, however, they are editorial all articles published in independent media sources. None are paid publications. Could you please give more insight into why you feel they do not meet guidelines and the draft can be approved? Thanks, @Michaelscottoriginal — Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaelscottoriginal (talk • contribs) 15:12, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

United Patriots Front‎

Hi i am here to ask you that might be you made some mistake that you've edited protest to hate . so, hate and protest are different. If you think i made a mistake than you can revert . Regards, AD ^Talk 06:03, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

I've seen in MANY sources that the group was called a hate group. Some Wikipedia pages even label them a hate group. Whatever do what you want with the article. I guess I try to help and I get hated. JC7V (talk) 17:45, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

• @Azkord: One of the articles linked in the United Patriots Front article labeled the United Patriots Front as a hate group. But again, political articles aren't my forte. I am about removing POV and peacockery as can be seen in my userpage history and I didn't want a racist group like the United Patriots Front to have anything in their page that could be seen as Pro United Patriots Front. But whatever, too bad Australia doesn't have their own SPLC. JC7V (talk) 18:40, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Email

Could you please explain this nonsense email you sent me in which you talked about percentages, 14 February, and outer space? Or is your account compromised? L293D (☎ • ✎) 01:56, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for being a compromised account.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  —CYBERPOWER (Happy 2019) 04:37, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, JC7V7DC5768. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 04:57, 6 January 2019 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

If you are the real JC7V, please check your inbox. I have sent an email to the address you used for Wikipedia before being compromised. Please respond ASAP. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk • contribs) 04:57, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Not compromised

My account is not compromised. I emailed some users some interesting info (I am into science in real life) and I never thought it would make everyone rattled. I never socialize on Wikipedia because i am too busy doing grunt work like vandal fighting and AFC reviewing, but i went about it the wrong way and I should have used IRC instead to socialize. I have asperger's so I don't know how to communicate good with others and I heard some theories on other universes and intelligent life on other planets and I thought it would be cool to share it with others. BTW AE, I removed you as a mentor because I am editing here 6 months and I doubt I need a mentor at this point. Thanks for helping me after the Winkelvi incedent in August (where he snapped at me for suggesting he not interact with another editor). I wish you were my mentor in August when Klueske was biting me for giving advice about paid editing to a newer user that conflicted with what he thought was right. JC7V (talk) 05:37, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Per this message, I have gone ahead and unblocked you. You should really leave such stuff on a person's talk page and send emails only when you feel the contents should remain private.  :-)—CYBERPOWER (Happy 2019) 07:31, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

Good bye

My account is not hacked. I was just having some fun. I apologize for that. I was pissed that Ammarpad didn't get promoted to admin and that I was being hounded for opposing JJMC89's RFA so i went nuts, I snapped. I've been abused here first by Kleuske in August over giving advice to an editor about paid editing that i was told by another admin, then Winkelvi abused me because I suggested he not interact with Snuggungms. Oshwah threatened to block me in August because an ip was falsely accusing me of stalking them when i was reverting the extreme changes they made to an article without consensus. I was abused by TonyBallioni in August when he accused me of being bitey. I am sick of being treated like shit here. I am sick of all the fake niceness when no one appreciateds my work here. After seeing Flooded with them Hundreds being abused at his ORFA poll i lost all good faith in this fucking site. I don't socialize on IRL since I don't chat but i wanted to here so what. JC7V (talk) 06:20, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

• Hey, I hope you're okay. I appreciate you're contributions here and I think a lot of us do. TonyBallioni and Oshwah are both friendly, reasonable people, and I don't think either of them intended to 'abuse' you in any way. And, Winkelvi's community banned, so who cares at this point? Also sorry you feel FwtH was abused at RfA, as one of their opposers. I know the feeling of being wronged/seeing others wronged and being driven to the brink by it; I just use it to motivate me to be a force for good here. Hope you'll reconsider your departure. No individual editors here are worth it.  ~~Swarm~~  {talk}  07:03, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Xbox 360

The article Xbox 360 you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Xbox 360 for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of David Fuchs -- David Fuchs (talk) 17:41, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Peer reviews

Hello! Editors can only have one peer review open at a time, if you could please close all but one. (not watching, please {{ping}}) czar 18:17, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Gene Hackman

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Gene Hackman you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Balon Greyjoy -- Balon Greyjoy (talk) 10:00, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Gene Hackman

The article Gene Hackman you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Gene Hackman for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Balon Greyjoy -- Balon Greyjoy (talk) 09:40, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Forced Alliance

Hello, JC7V7DC5768. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Forced Alliance.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 18:03, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Sorry

Sorry for saying that its because you are making fun of my Articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sayouloveme (talk • contribs) 22:03, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

go to [www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osmar_Schindler]

Your GA nomination of Gene Hackman

The article Gene Hackman you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Gene Hackman for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Balon Greyjoy -- Balon Greyjoy (talk) 16:01, 25 January 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Derek and the Dominos

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Derek and the Dominos you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Brandt Luke Zorn -- Brandt Luke Zorn (talk) 00:40, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Draft:His, Hers & the Truth

Hello, JC7V7DC5768. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:His, Hers & the Truth.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:23, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Draft on Gavagai Explorer declined by you some time ago

Hullo, I just now reviewed the draft page on Gavagai Explorer (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Gavagai_Explorer) you declined some time ago. You noted that " Issues are non independent sources (interview ones), routine sources (award announcements), or sources when taken together don't show WP:SIGCOV, please read WP:SIGCOV and WP:NCORP to see what sources are needed. JC7V (talk) 19:00, 8 December 2018 (UTC)" but I would like to point out that many of them (refs 8 to 16 as per the current version of the page) are not interviews nor award announcements but actual news reports on results generated by this company. I am not entirely comfortable editing the page too much since I am involved with the company, but I did try now to break up the paragraph a bit to make that clearer! (I also added a recent Ph D thesis entirely independent of the company as a reference (reference number 7)). I realise the value of each page must be taken on its own, without comparison to other pages but at the same time I do find that many other product pages have much less support in published data than this one :-). Please advise how I might proceed?

Jussi Karlgren (talk) 14:26, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Need more sources, ones that are reliable ,independent. See WP:RS or drop me a line and I'll point you in the right direction

I was told to ask you for help? Sorry new to this processM8ms2 (talk) 01:23, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

M8ms2 (talk) 01:23, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Los Angeles Innovation Team

Hello, JC7V7DC5768. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Los Angeles Innovation Team".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. DannyS712 (talk) 09:12, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Gerry Math

Hello, JC7V7DC5768. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gerry Math".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:10, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Derek and the Dominos

The article Derek and the Dominos you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Derek and the Dominos for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Brandt Luke Zorn -- Brandt Luke Zorn (talk) 19:01, 20 February 2019 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been indefinitely blocked by the Arbitration Committee.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, then appeal by emailing the Arbitration Committee (direct address: arbcom-enwikimedia.org).

---

Administrators: This block may not be modified or lifted without the express prior written consent of the Arbitration Committee. Questions about this block should be directed to the Committee's mailing list.

~ Rob₁₃^Talk 01:06, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Simpsons Movie 2

Hello, JC7V7DC5768. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Simpsons Movie 2".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 08:23, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Maxmoefoe

Hello, JC7V7DC5768. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Maxmoefoe".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. GamerPro64 04:22, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Chuck McCarthy

Hello, JC7V7DC5768. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Chuck McCarthy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:55, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Animal drive

Hello, JC7V7DC5768. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Animal drive".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 17:32, 7 July 2019 (UTC)

What did I do?

Okay I rarely ever visit wikipedia and I have made absolutely ZERO edits, Though it maybe a person who is using a fake clone of my ID, Since I only visit Wikipedia for the sake of my "Research" please check, As you've said that I was removing content from pages. Thankyou. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 223.190.117.206 (talk) 04:19, 20 February 2022 (UTC)