User talk:Narutolovehinata5

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Please leave a new message below this line. Remember to add a section heading. Thank you. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 08:18, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

• Also, if you are asking why I tagged your page for deletion, just leave a new message below the "Talk Page" thing. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 07:40, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Please add new sections below this line. Thank you. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:46, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Yū Sasahara

On 11 October 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Yū Sasahara, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that although Yū Sasahara dreamed of becoming a singer as a child, her father persuaded her to pursue a career in voice acting instead? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Yū Sasahara. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Yū Sasahara), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Peter Handke

Thank you for the article! The hook tells me nothing about her, only that she shares a story with many others: the parents don't want what a child dreams of. I will not protest against that kind of hooks, even if I don't understand them. Kindly consider to do the same with mine. I have real work to do here, Peter Handke, Nobel Prize winner with an article in sad condition today, and will be something else tomorrow. It's article work that counts, because they will stay. Hook wording is for one day, and not worth arsorbing thinking time for too long. Peace? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:32, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

In what aspects do you need help Gerda? Is it the hook wording, or hook suggestions? Or simply help on the article itself? I'm afraid the message you left above wasn't very clear. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 09:09, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

@Gerda Arendt: Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:16, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

I didn't give it a header Peter Handke, I thanked you for your article about another voice actress. Does that help understanding? I mentioned Handke only to explain how much more I want to do work on the real articles, than argue about miniature details of a DYK hook wording. Handke had a 6-digit view number yesterday, - one of those reaches many more readers than even a stats hook.

From my workshop: today, I want to write to write about Joshua Guerrero who impressed me as Des Grieux in Puccini's Manon Lescaut at the Oper Frankfurt. I know nothing else about him yet. A hook saying just that would be enough, it mentions an interesting opera, Puccini's first success, after two failures before. Everybody loves La bohème, this is where it came from, let readers find out. It evokes a powerful drama, ending with death of the girl in the desert, some will know that, others can find out. Oper Frankfurt was opera house of the year 2018 and several times before, no nead to mention that again, some will know and others can find out. That's what defines "interesting" for me: something readers are offered to learn about if they don't know yet. look, video, 5bio --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:04, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

@Gerda Arendt: I'm not the expert in opera here, you are, so if I know nothing about the person then I can't give suggestions on what could be used as a hook. In any case, if it's about hook suggestions that you want to ask about, particularly something related to his opera career, one thing I could suggest is to see if reviews could be found on his performances. Perhaps there are quotes out there praising his work and giving unusual qualities about him. Another suggestion could be to see, for example, finding information about their personal life and highlighting an aspect that people wouldn't normally associate with opera, i.e. to highlight contrast (an example would be Isabelle Druet's interest in reggae, since most people probably wouldn't expect an opera singer to like reggae as well). Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 09:22, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, you and I seem to speak different languages. I didn't ask you for advice about a hook about an article not yet written. I defended my choice. I will look for a review, but please keep in mind that ERRORS are sensitive for things not stricly factual, and a review is always the personal view of one critic (+ saying "a critic noted" makes a hook clumsy, imho). Something like Druet's interest in Reggae is nothing I would want to mention in the short line of a blurb. I might if in context of the great things she did, such in a TFA blurb (but perhaps not even then). For a living person, I try to say something that captures the essence of that person (who may read it!), not some cute quirky little aspect. - I remember the hook about an operatic soprano, article written by her daughter (with some help from project opera) who reported (on International Womens Day!) how happy her mother was, then 94, and alive only for a few more months. Imagine Ms. Druet, 30 years from now and reading in our archives that all we had to say about her was interest in Reggae.

I'd need hook help for the wording of Britten's Purcell Realizations (content is clear), and a suggestion (not promising to take it) for Clara Schumann, GA-to be. I am inclined - assuming that everybody knows already about marriage, and relation to Brahms - to mention tours to England and teaching 69 international student, assuming that what she really did unusually - being the first to play recital as we are used to today - will be nothing the general audience may grasp. I seriously consider FA for her, just to say a bit more ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:55, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

@Gerda Arendt: I'm really sorry Gerda, but I'm having difficulties with understanding exactly what you want help for. You mention that you are seeking for help for Britten's Purcell Realizations and Clara Schumann; however, you did not mention either of those articles in your initial comment. You also mention Joshua Guerrero. So are you asking me to help out with the Realizations and Schumann articles? And in what specific way are you asking for help here? The comments you left above weren't exactly clear and were on a bit on the long side. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:35, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

I am sorry to make you guessing. In my initial comment, I asked to please leave my hooks alone, to give me time for article work instead of forcing me to discuss hooks. You offered help for hook wording, and said I don't want it, then felt awful and not polite, rejecting a kind offer, and thought about for which hooks you could help, coming up with the two. No need for you to do anything. Did you check out the Anne Sharp hook and understand how much I want to say something about a BLP that the person can be proud of? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:53, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

(watching) Gerda, this is a very strange thread. You seem to be concluding that someone shouldn't look at your hooks because you're too busy with new article content. So why are you nominating hooks? Yoninah (talk) 23:28, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Do you know that sometimes I ask myself that very question? ITN is much more rewarding, in terms of reaching readers. 104k were interested in Handke already before he reached the main page. I had the good feeling to reach interested people by improving the article from an almost unreferenced detailed list of controversies to a sourced article also mentioning literature. Next day 50k, and still 22k yesterday, - easily more than all DYK of 2019 together. It took me half a day, - the estimated time of a DYK hook discussion such as for the Britten mentioned above, which in the end may raise readership from 500 to 700, or for Druet mentioned above, where - yes - Reggae attracted a few more readers (1,390) than the average opera singer (700?), but which readers? By not mentioning opera at all, didn't we loose those who may have been interested in her? Just some thoughts. Back to an earlier question: do you understand how pleased I was with the Anne Sharp hook? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:48, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Madara Uchiha

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Madara Uchiha has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 13:33, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

2019 US Banknote Contest

	US Banknote Contest
	November-December 2019
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here

Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)

Isla dela Victoria

Hi Narutolovehinata5, I've done a Cleanup of this article, I removed some irrelevant text but this seems to be more about local politics than the development itself. Cheers, Baffle☿gab 23:09, 25 October 2019 (UTC)

GA assessment

Hey, there, I noticed you declined my GA assessment while I was busy working on acquiring sources. I thought you had decided to have another editor take over it? lullabying (talk) 22:20, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

@Lullabying: Yes, I had requested another editor to take over as I had just been too busy to finish the review, and to be honest I wasn't confident in my skills as a GA reviewer. I'm very sorry for the inconvenience this situation has caused you. If you still have any questions, I think it might be a better idea to ask the new reviewer as they might be able to help out more. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:12, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Yes, but you were the one who closed the request while I was still working on it. I was under the impression you were no longer in charge of it. lullabying (talk) 15:43, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Lullabying - is it Idol × Warrior Miracle Tunes!? I'm a bit backed up, but I don't mind looking at it if you still want it nominated. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:08, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

@Lee Vilenski: Hey! It's nice to see you again. That would be great -- I'm currently in the process of getting more citations for the characters section since it was the only section that had issues. lullabying (talk) 22:23, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Always great to see a friendly face. I'll get to it (I have a couple GANs open, but I'll get to it after). Looks like it's been through a few hands.Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:38, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

November 2019 at Women in Red

November 2019, Volume 5, Issue 11, Numbers 107, 108, 140, 141, 142, 143 Check out what's happening in November at Women in Red... Online events: New: Librarians / Leaders / Geofocus: Asian Women Month Continuing: Suffrage / #1day1woman / Stub Contest Editor feedback: Check out the conversation regarding: Disappearing articles Help us plan our future events at the Ideas Cafe Join the conversations on our talkpage Social media: Facebook / Instagram / Pinterest / Twitter Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 22:58, 29 October 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging

  Boo!

Happy Halloween!

---

Hello Narutolovehinata5:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween!
    – Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:00, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Send Halloween cheer by adding {{subst:Happy Halloween}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

New Page Review newsletter November 2019

Hello Narutolovehinata5,

This newsletter comes a little earlier than usual because the backlog is rising again and the holidays are coming very soon.

Getting the queue to 0

There are now 726 holders of the New Page Reviewer flag! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog but it's still roughly less than 10% doing 90% of the work. Now it's time for action.
Exactly one year ago there were 'only' 3,650 unreviewed articles, now we will soon be approaching 7,000 despite the growing number of requests for the NPR user right. If each reviewer soon does only 2 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by every reviewer doing only 1 review every 2 days - that's only a few minutes work on the bus on the way to the office or to class! Let's get this over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.
Want to join? Consider adding the NPP Pledge userbox.
Our next newsletter will announce the winners of some really cool awards.

Coordinator

Admin Barkeep49 has been officially invested as NPP/NPR coordinator by a unanimous consensus of the community. This is a complex role and he will need all the help he can get from other experienced reviewers.

This month's refresher course

Paid editing is still causing headaches for even our most experienced reviewers: This official Wikipedia article will be an eye-opener to anyone who joined Wikipedia or obtained the NPR right since 2015. See The Hallmarks to know exactly what to look for and take time to examine all the sources.

Tools

• It is now possible to select new pages by date range. This was requested by reviewers who want to patrol from the middle of the list.
• It is now also possible for accredited reviewers to put any article back into the New Pages Feed for re-review. The link is under 'Tools' in the side bar.

Reviewer Feedback

Would you like feedback on your reviews? Are you an experienced reviewer who can give feedback to other reviewers? If so there are two new feedback pilot programs. New Reviewer mentorship will match newer reviewers with an experienced reviewer with a new reviewer. The other program will be an occasional peer review cohort for moderate or experienced reviewers to give feedback to each other. The first cohort will launch November 13.

Second set of eyes

• Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work, especially while some routine tagging for deletion can still be carried out by non NPR holders and inexperienced users. Read about it at the Monitoring the system section in the tutorial. If you come across such editors doing good work, don't hesitate to encourage them to apply for NPR.
• Do be sure to have our talk page on your watchlist. There are often items that require reviewers' special attention, such as to watch out for pages by known socks or disruptive editors, technical issues and new developments, and of course to provide advice for other reviewers.

Arbitration Committee

The annual ArbCom election will be coming up soon. All eligible users will be invited to vote. While not directly concerned with NPR, Arbcom cases often lead back to notability and deletion issues and/or actions by holders of advanced user rights.

Community Wish list

There is to be no wish list for WMF encyclopedias this year. We thank Community Tech for their hard work addressing our long list of requirements which somewhat overwhelmed them last year, and we look forward to a successful completion.

---

To opt-out of future mailings, you can remove yourself here

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

DYK for Jo Walker-Meador

I added another hook on the DYK for Jo Walker-Meador per request. Please review. Thanks. Chris (talk) 23:19, 6 November 2019 (UTC)

Followed up on another hook. Let's hope the third time is the charm. Chris (talk) 23:39, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Please check my references for Bodyguard Kiba: Apocalypse of Carnage 2

You asked for references for the production staff in Bodyguard Kiba: Apocalypse of Carnage 2, which I provided in the form of screenshots from the credits. I resubmitted the article here but it was never checked. Now the images have been removed by Wikipedia bots but you still haven't approved the article. Could you please give me your e-mail address so that I could send you the screenshots directly? If you are unwilling to do that, I have provided the screenshots for you here. Please review them and see that my information is correct. Nicholas0 (talk) 14:13, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

@Nicholas0: The cast could probably be cited to the film itself (the template {{cite film}} exists for this purpose). The one that really needs an inline citation is the paragraph that starts with "The production designer was Wayne Chen"; screenshots are insufficient for Wikipedia referencing purposes, although I suppose they could be cited to the film itself if no online or offline references could be found. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 00:26, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

I have cited the paragraph accordingly, but you can still check the screenshots I sent you to prove that I am not lying. Nicholas0 (talk) 01:31, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

I never said or even implied that you were lying, only that references were needed. In fact, I'm assuming in good faith that the film's credits has the required information. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 01:48, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Hadiqa Bashir

Hi @Narutolovehinata5: - Like you know, I am participating in WAM and the article on Hadiqa Bashir wasn't accepted. I see the reason and I understand that some facts need to be put as is. I have removed that part from the article as you indicated. I would love to know from you on how to best represent information that is as factual but doesn't come across as paraphrasing. I can learn a few things and would love your help. Thanks! --Parul Thakur (talk) 12:01, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

@Parul Thakur: It's relatively simple: the information could have been kept in the article, but instead of copying the source word-for-word, the paragraph could have instead been rewritten using your own words. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 12:30, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

@ParulThakur: Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 12:31, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

@Narutolovehinata5: I don't think I had copied the source word-to-word but I get your point. Will keep that in mind. Thank you!--Parul Thakur (talk) 13:23, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)