Withdrawal from the EU has been advocated by both left-wing and right-wing Eurosceptics, while pro-Europeanists, who also span the political spectrum, have advocated continued membership and maintaining the customs union and single market. The UK joined the European Communities (EC) in 1973 under the Conservative government of Edward Heath, with continued membership endorsed by a referendum in 1975. In the 1970s and 1980s, withdrawal from the EC was advocated mainly by the political left, with the Labour Party's 1983 election manifesto advocating full withdrawal. From the 1990s, opposition to further European integration came mainly from the right, and divisions within the Conservative Party led to rebellion over the Maastricht Treaty in 1992. The growth of the UK Independence Party (UKIP) in the early 2010s and the influence of the cross-party People's Pledge campaign have been described as influential in bringing about a referendum. The Conservative Prime Minister, David Cameron, pledged during the campaign for the 2015 UK General Election to hold a new referendum—a promise which he fulfilled in 2016 following pressure from the Eurosceptic wing of his party. Cameron, who had campaigned to remain, resigned after the result and was succeeded by Theresa May, his former Home Secretary. She called a snap general election less than a year later, but lost her overall majority. Her minority government is supported in key votes by the Democratic Unionist Party.
On 29 March 2017, the Government of the United Kingdom invoked Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union. May announced the government's intention not to seek permanent membership of the European single market or the EU customs union after leaving the EU and promised to repeal the European Communities Act of 1972 and incorporate existing European Union law into UK domestic law. Negotiations with the EU officially started in June 2017. In November 2018, the Draft Withdrawal Agreement, negotiated between the UK Government and the EU, was published. The House of Commons voted against the agreement by a margin of 432 to 202 (the largest parliamentary defeat in history for a sitting UK government) on 15 January 2019, and again on 12 March with a margin of 391 to 242 against the agreement. On 14 March 2019, the House of Commons voted for the Prime Minister, Theresa May, to ask the EU for such an extension of the period allowed for the negotiation. Members from across the House of Commons rejected the agreement with the leadership of the Labour Party stating in public debates in the House of Commons that any deal must maintain a customs union and single market, and with a large percentage of its members rejecting the Irish backstop as it is currently drafted in the EU withdrawal agreement. Opponents of the EU Withdrawal Agreement cited concerns that the agreement as drafted could plunge Northern Ireland into a conflict and spark a return of The Troubles as a result of Brexit.
The broad consensus among economists is that Brexit will likely reduce the UK's real per capita income in the medium term and long term, and that the Brexit referendum itself damaged the economy.[a] Studies on effects since the referendum show a reduction in GDP, trade and investment, as well as household losses from increased inflation. Brexit is likely to reduce immigration from European Economic Area (EEA) countries to the UK, and poses challenges for UK higher education and academic research. As of March 2019[update], the size of the "divorce bill"—the UK's inheritance of existing EU trade agreements—and relations with Ireland and other EU member states remains uncertain. The precise impact on the UK depends on whether the process will be a "hard" or "soft" Brexit.
Terminology and etymology
- Article 50
- Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union is a procedure in treaty that sets out how member states can leave the Union, with a two-year timetable for leaving. Article 50 was triggered by Prime Minister Theresa May at the end of March 2017.
- A term referring to the government's proposal to keep Northern Ireland in some aspects of the European Union Customs Union and of the European Single Market to prevent a hard border in Ireland, so as not to compromise the Good Friday Agreement.
- Blind / Blindfold Brexit
- Coined in September 2018 to describe a scenario where the UK leaves the EU without clarity on the terms of a future trade deal. EU and British negotiators would then have until 31 December 2020 to sign off on a future trade deal, during which time the UK will effectively remain a member of the EU, but with no voting rights.
- Brexit (like its early variant, Brixit) is a portmanteau of "British" and "exit". Grammatically, it has been called a complex nominal. The first attestation in the Oxford English Dictionary is a Euractiv blog post by Peter Wilding on 15 May 2012. It was coined by analogy with "Grexit", attested on 6 February 2012 to refer to a hypothetical withdrawal of Greece from the eurozone (and possibly also the EU altogether, although there was never a clear popular mandate for it). At present, Brexit is impending under the EU Treaties and the UK Acts of Parliament, and the current negotiations pursuant thereto.
- Canada plus / Canada model
- This is shorthand for a model where the United Kingdom leaves the European Union and signs a free trade agreement. This would allow the UK to control its own trade policy as opposed to jointly negotiating alongside the European Union, but would require rules of origin agreements to be reached for UK–EU trade. It is likely this would lead to trade being less "free" than joining the EFTA, and result in additional border controls being required, which is an issue of contention, particularly on the island of Ireland. The Canadian–European Union deal took seven years to negotiate, but Brexiteers argue it would take much less time between the UK and EU as the two participants already align on regulatory standards.
- Chequers plan
- The short name given by the media to The framework for the future relationship between the United Kingdom and the European Union, the government's white paper drawn up at Chequers and published on 12 July 2018 which set out the sort of relationship the UK government wanted with the EU after Brexit. On 22 November 2018 the government published the updated draft.
- Customs Union
- A customs union is an agreement under which two or more countries agree not to impose taxes on imported goods from one another and to apply a common tariff on goods imported from countries not party to the agreement. For more information.
- Divorce bill
- It is expected that the UK will make a contribution toward financial commitments that it approved while still a member of the EU, but are still outstanding. The amount owed is officially referred to as the financial settlement but has informally been referred to as an exit bill or divorce bill. While serving as Brexit Secretary, Dominic Raab said the UK will not pay the full financial settlement to the EU in a no-deal scenario but would instead pay a significantly lower amount to cover the UK's "strict legal obligations". The UK Government's estimate of the financial settlement in March 2019 is £38 billion.
- Hard and soft Brexit
- "Hard Brexit" and "soft Brexit" are unofficial terms that are commonly used by news media to describe the prospective relationship between the UK and the EU after withdrawal. A hard Brexit (also called a no-deal Brexit) usually refers to the UK leaving the EU and the European Single Market with few or no deals (trade or otherwise) in place, meaning that trade will be conducted under the World Trade Organization's rules, and services will no longer be provided by agencies of the European Union (such as aviation safety). Soft Brexit encompasses any deal that involves retaining membership in the European Single Market and at least some free movement of people according to European Economic Area (EEA) rules. Theresa May's "Chequers plan" embraced some aspects of a "soft" Brexit. Note that the EEA and the deal with Switzerland contain fully free movement of people, and that the EU has wanted that to be included in a deal with UK on fully free trade.
- Hard border
- Because of Brexit, a physical border could be erected between Northern Ireland, a constituent part of the United Kingdom, and the Republic of Ireland, an EU member state. This raises concerns about the future of the Good Friday Agreement (or Belfast Agreement), a peace deal signed in 1998 which helped to end the Northern Ireland conflict (The Troubles).
- Indicative vote
- Indicative votes are votes by members of parliament on a series of non-binding resolutions. They are a means of testing the will of the House of Commons on different options relating to one issue. MPs have voted on eight different options for the next steps in the Brexit process on 27 March 2019; however, none of the proposals earned a majority in the indicative votes. MPs also voted on four options on 1 April 2019 in the second round of indicative votes. Still, none of the proposals earned a majority.
- Those supporting Brexit are sometimes referred to as "Leavers". Alternatively the term "Brexiteers", or "Brexiters" has been used to describe adherents of the Leave campaign. Likewise, the pejorative term "Brextremist", a portmanteau of "Brexiter" and "Extremist" has been used by some outlets to describe Leavers of an overzealous, uncompromising disposition.
- Meaningful vote
- A meaningful vote is a vote under section 13 of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018, requiring the government to arrange for a motion proposing approval of the outcome of negotiations with the EU to be debated and voted on by the House of Commons before the European Parliament decides whether it consents to the withdrawal agreement being concluded on behalf of the EU in accordance with Article 50(2) of the Treaty on European Union.
- Managed no-deal
- "Managed no-deal Brexit" or "managed no deal Brexit"was increasingly used near the end of 2018, in respect of the complex series of political, legal and technical decisions needed if there is no withdrawal agreement treaty with the EU when the UK exits under the Article 50 withdrawal notice.
- No deal Brexit
- This means the UK would leave the European Union without a withdrawal agreement.
- Norway model/ Norway plus
- This is shorthand for a model where the United Kingdom leaves the European Union but becomes a member of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) and the European Economic Area, possibly with the addition of a customs union ("plus"). EFTA and EEA membership would allow the UK to remain in the single market but without having to be subject to the Common Fisheries Policy, Common Agricultural Policy, and the European Court of Justice. The UK would be subject to the EFTA court, which largely shadows the ECJ, have to transfer a large amount of EU law into UK law, and have little say on shaping EU rules (some of which the UK will be compelled to take on). The UK would also have to allow freedom of movement between the EU and UK, something that was seen as a key issue of contention in the referendum.
- People's Vote
- People's Vote is an advocacy group launched in April 2018, who calls for a public vote on the final Brexit deal. The People's Vote march is part of a series of demonstrations against Brexit.
- Those in favour of the UK remaining in the EU are sometimes referred to as "Remainers". The derogatory term "Remoaner" (a blend of "remainer" and "moan") is sometimes used by Brexiters to describe adherents of the Remain campaign.
- Second referendum
- A second referendum (otherwise known as People's vote) has been proposed by a number of politicians and pressure groups. The Electoral Commission of UK has the responsibility for nominating lead campaign groups for each possible referendum outcome.
- Slow Brexit
- The term ‘slow Brexit’ was first coined by British Prime Minister Theresa May on 25 March 2019 as she spoke to Parliament, warning MPs that Article 50 could be extended beyond 22 May, slowing down the Brexit process. A ‘slow Brexit’ implies a longer period of political uncertainty in which members of Parliament will debate the next steps of Britain’s departure from the European Union.
Background: The United Kingdom and Europe
The "Inner Six" European countries signed the Treaty of Paris in 1951, establishing the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC). The 1955 Messina Conference deemed that the ECSC was a success, and resolved to extend the concept further, thereby leading to the 1957 Treaties of Rome establishing the European Economic Community (EEC) and the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom). In 1967, these became known as the European Communities (EC). The UK attempted to join in 1963 and 1967, but these applications were vetoed by the President of France, Charles de Gaulle.
Accession and period of European Union membership
After de Gaulle relinquished the French presidency, the UK successfully applied for membership and the Conservative prime minister Edward Heath signed the Treaty of Accession in 1972. Parliament passed the European Communities Act later that year and the UK joined Denmark and Ireland in becoming a member of the EC on 1 January 1973.
The opposition Labour Party won the February 1974 general election without a majority and then contested the subsequent October 1974 general election with a commitment to renegotiate Britain's terms of membership of the EC, believing them to be unfavourable, and then hold a referendum on whether to remain in the EC on the new terms. Labour again won the election (this time with a small majority), and in 1975 the United Kingdom held its first ever national referendum, asking whether the UK should remain in the European Communities. Despite significant division within the ruling Labour Party, all major political parties and the mainstream press supported continuing membership of the EC. On 5 June 1975, 67.2 per cent of the electorate and all but two UK counties and regions voted to stay in; support for the UK to leave the EC in 1975 appears unrelated to the support for Leave in the 2016 referendum.
The Labour Party campaigned in the 1983 general election on a commitment to withdraw from the EC without a referendum, although after a heavy defeat Labour changed its policy. In 1985, the Thatcher government ratified the Single European Act—the first major revision to the Treaty of Rome—without a referendum.
In October 1990, under pressure from senior ministers and despite Margaret Thatcher's deep reservations, the United Kingdom joined the European Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM), with the pound sterling pegged to the deutschmark. Thatcher resigned as Prime Minister the following month, amid Conservative Party divisions arising partly from her increasingly Eurosceptic views. The United Kingdom and Italy were forced to withdraw from the ERM in September 1992, after the pound sterling and the lira came under pressure from currency speculation ("Black Wednesday").
Under the Maastricht Treaty, the European Communities became the European Union on 1 November 1993, reflecting the evolution of the organisation from an economic union into a political union. Denmark, France, and Ireland held referendums to ratify the Maastricht Treaty. In accordance with British constitutional convention, specifically that of parliamentary sovereignty, ratification in the UK was not subject to approval by referendum. Despite this, the British constitutional historian Vernon Bogdanor wrote at the time that there was "a clear constitutional rationale for requiring a referendum" because although MPs are entrusted with legislative power by the electorate, they are not given authority to transfer that power (the UK's previous three referendums all concerned the transfer of parliamentary powers). Further, as the ratification of the treaty was in the manifestos of the three major political parties, voters opposed to ratification had no way to express that opposition. For Bogdanor, while the ratification of the treaty by the House of Commons might be legal, it would not be legitimate—which requires popular consent. The way in which the treaty was ratified, he judged, was "likely to have fundamental consequences both for British politics and for Britain's relationship with the European Community." This perceived democratic deficit directly led to the formation of the Referendum Party and the United Kingdom Independence Party.
Euroscepticism, opt-outs and 'outers'
In 1994, Sir James Goldsmith formed the Referendum Party to contest the 1997 general election on a platform of providing a referendum on the nature of the United Kingdom's relationship with the rest of the European Union. The party fielded candidates in 547 constituencies at that election, and won 810,860 votes—2.6 per cent of the total votes cast—but failed to win a parliamentary seat due to the vote being spread across the country. The Referendum Party disbanded after Goldsmith's death in 1997.
The UK Independence Party (UKIP), a Eurosceptic political party, was formed in 1993. It achieved third place in the UK during the 2004 European elections, second place in the 2009 European elections and first place in the 2014 European elections, with 27.5 per cent of the total vote. This was the first time since the 1910 general election that any party other than Labour or the Conservatives had taken the largest share of the vote in a nationwide election. UKIP's electoral success in the 2014 European election is documented as the strongest correlate of the support for the leave campaign in the 2016 referendum.
UKIP won two by-elections (triggered by defecting Conservative MPs) in 2014; in the 2015 general election, the party took 12.6 per cent of the total vote and held one of the two seats won in 2014.
|Country||# of opt‑outs||Policy area|
|Schengen Area||Economic and Montetary Union (EMU)||Security and Defence Policy (CSDP)||Area of freedom, security and justice (AFSJ)||Charter of Fundamental Rights||Social Chapter|
|Ireland||2||O (opt-in)||NO||NO||O (opt-in)||NO||NO|
|United Kingdom||4||O (opt-in)||O||NO||O (opt-in)||O||F|
"opt-in" – possibility to opt in on a case-by-case basis.
Opinion polls 1977–2015
Both pro- and anti-EU views have had majority support at different times since 1977. In the European Communities membership referendum of 1975, two-thirds of British voters favoured continued EC membership. There is Euroscepticism both on the left and right of British politics.
According to a statistical analysis published in April 2016 by Professor John Curtice of Strathclyde University, surveys showed an increase in Euroscepticism (defined as a wish to sever or reduce the powers of the EU) from 38% in 1993 to 65% in 2015. Euroscepticism should, however, not be confused with the wish to leave the EU: the BSA survey for the period July–November 2015 showed that 60 per cent backed the option to continue as an EU member and 30 per cent backed the option to withdraw.
Referendum of 2016
Negotiations for membership reform
In 2012, Prime Minister David Cameron initially rejected calls for a referendum on the UK's EU membership, but then suggested the possibility of a future referendum to endorse his proposed renegotiation of Britain's relationship with the rest of the EU. According to the BBC, "The prime minister acknowledged the need to ensure the UK's [renegotiated] position within the European Union had 'the full-hearted support of the British people' but they needed to show 'tactical and strategic patience'." On 23 January 2013, under pressure from many of his MPs and from the rise of UKIP, Cameron announced that a Conservative government would hold an in-or-out referendum on EU membership before the end of 2017, on a renegotiated package, if elected in the 7 May 2015 general election. This was included in the Conservative Party manifesto for the election.
The Conservative Party won the election with a majority. Soon afterwards, the European Union Referendum Act 2015 was introduced into Parliament to enable the referendum. Cameron favoured remaining in a reformed European Union, and sought to renegotiate on four key points: protection of the single market for non-eurozone countries, reduction of "red tape", exempting Britain from "ever-closer union", and restricting immigration from the rest of the European Union.
In December 2015, opinion polls showed a clear majority in favour of remaining in the EU; they also showed support would drop if Cameron did not negotiate adequate safeguards[definition needed] for non-eurozone member states, and restrictions on benefits for non-British EU citizens.
The outcome of the renegotiations was announced in February 2016. Some limits to in-work benefits for new EU immigrants were agreed, but before they could be applied, a member state such as the UK would have to get permission from the European Commission and then from the European Council, which is composed of the heads of government of every member state.
In a speech to the House of Commons on 22 February 2016, Cameron announced a referendum date of 23 June 2016, and commented on the renegotiation settlement. He spoke of an intention to trigger the Article 50 process immediately following a leave vote, and of the "two-year time period to negotiate the arrangements for exit."
The agreed referendum question was "Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?"
The official campaign group for leaving the EU was Vote Leave after a contest for the designation with Leave.EU. Vote Leave was later found to have exceeded its allowed spending limit during the campaign.
The official campaign to stay in the EU, chaired by Stuart Rose, was known as Britain Stronger in Europe, or informally as 'Remain'. Other campaigns supporting remaining in the EU included Conservatives In, Labour in for Britain, #INtogether (Liberal Democrats), Greens for a Better Europe, Scientists for EU, Environmentalists For Europe, Universities for Europe and Another Europe is Possible.
The result was announced on the morning of 24 June: 51.89 per cent voted in favour of leaving the European Union, and 48.11 per cent voted in favour of remaining a member of the European Union. Comprehensive results are available from the UK Electoral Commission Referendum Results site. A petition calling for a second referendum attracted more than four million signatures, but was rejected by the government on 9 July.
|United Kingdom European Union membership referendum, 2016|
|Leave the European Union||17,410,742||51.89%|
|Remain a member of the European Union||16,141,241||48.11%|
|Invalid or blank votes||25,359||0.08%|
|Registered voters and turnout||46,500,001||72.21%|
|Voting age population and turnout||51,356,768||65.38%|
|Source: Electoral Commission|
Voter demographics and trends
According to researchers based at the University of Warwick, areas with "deprivation in terms of education, income and employment were more likely to vote Leave". The Leave vote tended to be greater in areas which had lower incomes and high unemployment, a strong tradition of manufacturing employment, and in which the population had fewer qualifications. It also tended to be greater where there was a large flow of Eastern European migrants (mainly low-skilled workers) into areas with a large share of native low-skilled workers. Those in lower social grades (especially the 'working class') were more likely to vote Leave, while those in higher social grades (especially the 'upper middle class') more likely to vote Remain.
According to Thomas Sampson, an economist at the London School of Economics, "Older and less-educated voters were more likely to vote 'leave' [...] A majority of white voters wanted to leave, but only 33 per cent of Asian voters and 27 per cent of black voters chose leave. There was no gender split in the vote [...] Leaving the European Union received support from across the political spectrum [...] Voting to leave the European Union was strongly associated with holding socially conservative political beliefs, opposing cosmopolitanism, and thinking life in Britain is getting worse". Econometric studies show that "education and, to a lesser extent, age were the strongest demographic predictors of voting behaviour". Support for leaving was linked with "poor economic outcomes at the individual or area level" and with "self-reported opposition to immigration, but not with exposure to immigration".
Opinion polls found that Leave voters believed leaving the EU was "more likely to bring about a better immigration system, improved border controls, a fairer welfare system, better quality of life, and the ability to control our own laws", while Remain voters believed EU membership "would be better for the economy, international investment, and the UK's influence in the world". Polls found that the main reasons people voted Leave were "the principle that decisions about the UK should be taken in the UK", and that leaving "offered the best chance for the UK to regain control over immigration and its own borders". The main reason people voted Remain was that "the risks of voting to leave the EU looked too great when it came to things like the economy, jobs and prices".
Resignations, contests, and appointments
After the result was declared, Cameron announced that he would resign by October. He stood down on 13 July 2016, with Theresa May becoming Prime Minister after a leadership contest. George Osborne was replaced as Chancellor of the Exchequer by Philip Hammond, former Mayor of London Boris Johnson was appointed Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, and David Davis became Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union. Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn lost a vote of confidence among his parliamentary party, and an unsuccessful leadership challenge was launched. On 4 July, Nigel Farage announced his resignation as leader of UKIP.
Irregularities have been alleged in the conduct of the referendum campaign.
On 11 May 2018, the UK Electoral Commission found against Leave.EU, which ran a separate campaign to the official pro-Brexit group Vote Leave, following its investigations into alleged irregularities during the referendum campaign. Leave.EU's co-founder Arron Banks has stated that he rejects the outcome of the investigation and will be challenging it in court.
In July 2018, the UK Electoral Commission found Vote Leave to have broken electoral law, spending over its limit. Also, the House of Commons Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee released an interim report on Disinformation and ‘fake news’, stating that the largest donor in the Brexit campaign, Arron Banks, had "failed to satisfy" the Committee that his donations came from UK sources, and may have been financed by the Russian government.
There has been litigation to explore the constitutional footings on which Brexit stands after the Miller case and the 2017 Notification Act:
- In R. (Webster) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, the High Court of Justice determined that the decision to leave the EU was an executive decision of the Prime Minister using a statutory power of decision found to have been delegated to her by the Notification Act.[better source needed] This case was criticised academically, and it is also subject to an appeal.
- The confirmation that the decision was an executive act was part of the basis of R. (Wilson) v. Prime Minister the impact irregularities in the referendum, which is the basis for the executive decision to leave, is being challenged, with a hearing on 7 December 2018.[clarification needed]
- Regarding the reversibility of a notification under Article 50, Wightman and others v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union was referred to Court of Justice of the European Union; the UK government sought to block this referral, taking the matter on appeal to the UK Supreme Court, but was unsuccessful. On 10 December 2018, the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the UK could unilaterally revoke its Article 50 notification.
Timeline June 2016 to April 2019
Below is the timeline of major events concerning Brexit.
23 June: The UK holds a referendum on whether to leave the European Union. 51.9% of voters vote to leave.
24 June: David Cameron announces his resignation as Prime Minister.
13 July: Theresa May accepts the Queen's invitation to form a government. David Davis is appointed the newly created Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union to oversee withdrawal negotiations.
27 July: The European Commission nominates French politician Michel Barnier as European Chief Negotiator for the United Kingdom Exiting the European Union.
7 December: The UK House of Commons votes 461 to 89 in favour of May’s plan to trigger Article 50 by the end of March 2017.
24 January: The UK Supreme Court rules in the Miller case that Parliament must pass legislation to authorise the triggering of Article 50.
26 January: The UK Government introduces a 137-word bill in Parliament to empower May to initiate Brexit by triggering Article 50. Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn instructs his MPs to support it.
16 March: The bill receives Royal Assent.
29 March: A letter from May is handed to President of the European Council Donald Tusk to invoke Article 50, starting a two year process with the UK due to leave the EU on 29 March 2019.
18 April: Theresa May announces that a general election is to take place on 8 June.
8 June: A general election is held in the UK. The Conservative Party remains the largest single party in the House of Commons but loses its majority, resulting in the formation of a minority government with a confidence-and-supply arrangement with the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) of Northern Ireland.
19 June: Brexit negotiations commence.
6 July: A UK White paper on The future relationship between the United Kingdom and the European Union is finalised.
8 July: Davis resigns as Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union. Dominic Raab is appointed as his successor the following day.
21 September: EU reject the UK white paper.
14 November: Brexit withdrawal agreement published.
15 November: Raab resigns as Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union. Stephen Barclay is appointed as his successor the following day.
25 November: Other 27 EU Member States endorse the Withdrawal Agreement.
15 January: First meaningful vote held on the Withdrawal Agreement in the UK House of Commons. The UK Government is defeated by 432 votes to 202.
12 March: Second meaningful vote on the Withdrawal Agreement with the UK Government defeated again by 391 votes to 242.
14 March: UK Government motion passes 412 to 202 to extend the Article 50 period.
20 March: May requests the EU extend the Article 50 period until 30 June 2019.
21 March: The European Council offers to extend the Article 50 period until 22 May 2019 if the Withdrawal Agreement is passed by 29 March 2019 but, if it does not, then the UK has until 12 April 2019 to indicate a way forward. The extension is formally agreed the following day.
29 March: The original end of the Article 50 period and the original planned date for Brexit. Third vote on the Withdrawal Agreement after being separated from the Political Declaration. UK Government defeated again by 344 votes to 286.
5 April: May requests for a second time that the EU extend the Article 50 period until 30 June 2019.
10 April: The European Council grants another extension to the Article 50 period to 31 October 2019, or the first day of the month after that in which the Withdrawal Agreement is passed, whichever comes first. However, the UK must hold European Parliament elections in May 2019; otherwise it will leave on 1 June 2019.
Article 50 process
Withdrawal from the European Union is governed by Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union. Under the Article 50 invocation procedure, a member notifies the European Council, whereupon the EU is required to "negotiate and conclude an agreement with [the leaving] State, setting out the arrangements for its withdrawal, taking account of the framework for its future relationship with the [European] Union". The negotiation period is limited to two years unless extended, after which the treaties cease to apply. There was a discussion whether parallel negotiation of withdrawal terms and future relationships under Article 50 are appropriate (Chancellor Merkel's initial view) or whether Britain did not have the right to negotiate future trade with the EU27 as this power is arguably reserved to the EU as long as the UK is a member (the view of a European Commission lawyer).
Although the 2015 Referendum Act did not expressly require Article 50 to be invoked, the UK government stated that it would expect a leave vote to be followed by withdrawal. Following the referendum result, Cameron resigned and said that it would be for the incoming Prime Minister to invoke Article 50.
The Supreme Court ruled in the Miller case in January 2017 that the government needed parliamentary approval to trigger Article 50. Subsequently, the House of Commons overwhelmingly voted, on 1 February 2017, for a government bill authorising the prime minister to notify an intention to leave under Article 50, and the bill passed into law as the European Union (Notification of Withdrawal) Act 2017. Theresa May then signed a letter invoking Article 50 on 28 March 2017, which was delivered on 29 March by Tim Barrow, the UK's ambassador to the EU, to European Council President Donald Tusk.
It had been argued that the Article 50 withdrawal process could be halted unilaterally by the British government, with which opinion the author of Article 50 itself, Lord Kerr, expressed agreement. The European Parliament's Brexit committee said that unilateral revocation, regardless of its legality, poses a substantial moral hazard, with an EU member state potentially able to abuse it to blackmail the Union.
The reversibility of notifications under Article 50 was subject to litigation, which a cross-party group of Scottish politicians and the Good Law Project referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union. The UK government sought to block this referral, ultimately in the UK Supreme Court, but it was unsuccessful in this attempt. On 10 December 2018, the ECJ ruled that a country could unilaterally cancel its withdrawal from the EU, by simple notice, provided that it did so prior to actual departure, unconditionally and in good faith. However the Government's immediate response was that it had no intention of exercising that right.
|Wikisource has original text related to this article:|
Both parties to the withdrawal negotiation are bound by Article 50 (3) of the Treaty, which states explicitly that the EU treaties will cease to apply "from the date of entry into force of the withdrawal agreement or, failing that, two years after" the withdrawal notification unless the EU Council and UK agree to extend the two-year period.
The European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (as amended by a UK Statutory Instrument on 11 April 2019), in section 20 (1), defines 'exit day' as 11:00 p.m. on 31 October 2019. Originally, 'exit day' was defined as 11:00 p.m. on 29 March 2019 GMT (UTC+0).
Withdrawal Agreement and Political Declaration
Various EU leaders said that they would not start any negotiation before the UK formally invokes Article 50. In October 2016, European Commission President Juncker rejected a suggestion that the EU should negotiate in such a way that Britain would be able to hold a second referendum. On 28 June 2016, Chancellor of Germany Angela Merkel, and on the following day European Council President Tusk, stated that the UK could remain in the European Single Market (ESM) only if the UK accepted its four freedoms of movement: for goods, capital, services, and labour. In October, Prime Minister Theresa May emphasised that ending the jurisdiction of EU law and free movement from Europe were the UK's priorities, along with British and EU companies having maximum freedom to trade in the UK and the ESM.
In November 2016, May proposed that Britain and the other EU member states mutually guarantee the residency rights of the 3.3 million non-British EU citizens in the UK and those of the 1.2 million British citizens living in the rest of the European Union, in order to exclude their fates being bargained during Brexit negotiations. Despite initial approval from a majority of EU states, May's proposal was blocked by Council President Tusk alongside member state Germany.
In January 2017, the Prime Minister presented 12 negotiating objectives and confirmed that the UK government would not seek permanent single market membership. She also called for an end to European Court of Justice jurisdiction, a new customs agreement excluding the common external tariff and the EU's common commercial policy, an end to free movement of people, co-operation in crime and terrorism, collaboration in areas of science and technology, engagement with devolved administrations, maintaining the Common Travel Area with Ireland, and preserving existing workers' rights. She also confirmed, "that the Government will put the final deal that is agreed between the UK and the EU to a meaningful vote in both Houses of Parliament, before it comes into force." The European Parliament's lead negotiator Guy Verhofstadt responded that there could be no "cherry-picking" by the UK in the talks.
The statutory period for negotiation began on 29 March 2017, when the UK formally submitted a letter notifying withdrawal. The letter called for a "deep and special relationship" between the UK and the EU, and warned that failure to reach an agreement would result in EU-UK trade under World Trade Organization terms, and a weakening of the UK's co-operation in the fight against crime and terrorism. The letter suggested prioritising an early deal on the rights of EU citizens in the UK and vice versa, and stated that the UK would not seek to remain within the ESM. Instead, the UK would seek a free trade agreement with the EU. In response, Merkel insisted that the EU would not discuss future co-operation without first settling the terms of leaving the EU; Verhofstadt referred to the letter as "blackmail" with regard to the point on security and terrorism, and EU Commission president Jean-Claude Juncker said the UK's decision to no longer be a part of the Union was a "choice they will regret one day".
The UK and EU negotiators agreed that initial negotiations, relating especially to residency rights, would commence in June 2017 (immediately after the French presidential and parliamentary elections), and full negotiations, relating especially to trading agreements, could commence in October 2017 (immediately after the German federal election, 2017). The first day of talks was 19 June.
On 29 April 2017, immediately after the first round of French presidential elections, the remaining 27 member state heads of government accepted negotiating guidelines prepared by Tusk. The guidelines took the view that Article 50 permitted a two-phased negotiation, in which the UK first agrees to a financial commitment and to lifelong benefits for EU citizens in Britain, and then negotiations on a future relationship could begin. In the first phase, the member states would demand the UK pay a "divorce bill", initially estimated as amounting to £52bn and then, after additional financial demands from Germany, France, and Poland, to £92bn. A report of the European Union Committee of the British House of Lords, published on 4 March 2017, stated that if there were to be no post-Brexit deal at the end of the negotiating period, the UK could withdraw without payment.
On 22 May 2017, the European Council authorised its negotiators to start the Brexit talks and it adopted its negotiating directives. The first day of talks took place on 19 June, where Davis and Michel Barnier, European Chief Negotiator for Brexit, agreed to prioritise the question of residency rights, while Davis conceded that a discussion of the Northern Irish border would have to await future trade agreements.
On 22 June 2017, Prime Minister May guaranteed that no EU citizen living legally in the UK would be forced to leave, and offered that any EU citizen who lived in the UK for more than five years until an unspecified deadline between March 2017 and March 2019 would enjoy the same rights as a UK citizen, conditional on the EU providing the same offer to British citizens living legally in the EU. The Prime Minister detailed her residency proposals on 26 June, but drew no concessions from EU negotiators, who had declined to expedite agreement on expatriates by the end of June 2017, and who are hoping for European courts to continue to have jurisdiction in the UK with regards to EU citizens, according to their negotiation aims published in May 2017.
The second round of negotiations began in mid-July 2017. Progress was made on the Northern Irish border question; UK negotiators requested a detailed breakdown of the "divorce bill" demand; and the EU negotiators criticised the UK's citizenship rights offer. David Davis did not commit to a net payment by the UK to the EU with regards to the requested divorce bill, while Michel Barnier would not compromise on his demand for the European Court of Justice to have continuing jurisdiction over the rights of EU citizens living in the UK after Brexit, rejecting the compromise proposal of a new international body made up of UK and EU judges.
On 16 August 2017, the UK government disclosed the first of several papers detailing British ambitions following Brexit, discussing trade and customs arrangements. On 23 August Theresa May announced that Britain would leave the EU Court of Justice's direct jurisdiction when the planned transition period ended, but that both the British courts and the EU Court of Justice would also keep "half an eye" on each other's rulings afterwards as well. One of the UK government's position papers published in August called for no additional restrictions for goods already on the market in the UK and EU.
The third round of negotiations began on 28 August 2017. There was disagreement over the financial settlement; The Irish Times explained that British negotiators referred to the seven-year Multi-annual Financial Framework (MFF or Maff) for the period 2014–2020 agreed by member states and the European parliament as a "planning tool" for the next period rather than a legally-binding financial obligation on member states. The British case is that the MFF sets ceilings on spending under various headings and is later radically revised during the annual budget process when real legal obligations on each state arises. This contrasts with the EU Commission's methodology for calculating the UK Brexit bill which involves dividing the MFF into the shares historically agreed by each member state. On the Irish border question there was a "breakthrough", with the British side guaranteeing free movement of EU citizens within the Common travel area constituting Ireland and the United Kingdom.
On 5 September 2017, Davis said that "concrete progress" had been made over the summer in areas such as protecting the rights of British expats in the EU to access healthcare and over the future of the Irish border, while significant differences over the "divorce bill" remained. On 9 September, the EU Commission published several negotiating papers, including one in which the EU concedes/declares that it is the responsibility of the UK to propose solutions for the post-Brexit Irish border. The paper envisages that a "unique" solution would be permissible here; in other words, any such exceptional Irish solution would not necessarily be a template for post-Brexit relationships with the other EU member states.
On 22 September 2017, May announced further details of her Brexit proposal. In addition to offering 20 billion euros over a two-year transition period and continued acceptance of European immigrants, she also offered a "bold new security relationship" with the EU which would be "unprecedented in its depth" and to continue to make "an ongoing contribution" to projects considered greatly to the EU and UK's advantage, such as science and security projects. She also confirmed that the UK would not "stand in the way" of Juncker's proposals for further EU integration. Barnier welcomed May's proposal as "constructive," but that it also "must be translated into negotiating positions to make meaningful progress". Similarly, President of France Emmanuel Macron was adamant that the EU would not begin negotiations on future EU-UK relationships until "the regulation of European citizens, the financial terms of the exit, and the questions of Ireland" were "clarified" by the UK.
The fourth round of talks began on 25 September, with Barnier declaring he had no mandate from the EU27 to discuss a transition deal suggested by Prime Minister May. Davis reiterated that the UK could honour commitments made during its EU membership only in the context of a future "special partnership" deal with the EU.
At the European Council meeting of 19/20 October 2017, the 27 leaders of the EU states were to decide whether or not to start trade negotiations with the UK. However, Davis has conceded that so soon after the German elections on 24 September, a German coalition government may not be in place in time for making this decision in October, delaying any European Council decision until their December meeting.
EU negotiators have stated that an agreement must be reached between Britain and the EU by October 2018 in order to leave time for national parliaments to endorse Brexit.
On 9 October 2017, May announced to the British Parliament that Britain could operate as an "independent trading nation" after Brexit if no trade deal is reached with the EU.
In December 2017, EU leaders announced an agreement to begin the next phase of negotiations, with talks on a transition period after March 2019 to begin in early 2018 and discussions on the future UK–EU relationship, including trade and security, to begin in March.
On 10 June 2018, the Irish Prime Minister Leo Varadkar cleared the path for the June negotiations by postponing the Irish border question until the final Brexit deal in October 2018.
On 19 June 2018, the UK and the EU published a joint statement outlining agreements at the negotiators' level. Michel Barnier praised the "dedication and commitment" of the negotiating teams, and said progress had been made in issues like customs, VAT and the European nuclear agreement, Euratom.
On 12 July 2018, Prime Minister May and part of the cabinet published a proposal for agreement on future relations between UK and EU. Its nickname came to be known by various British media outlets as the Chequers plan.
On 14 November 2018, a lengthy meeting of the Cabinet approved a Draft Withdrawal Agreement. The following day, Brexit Secretary Dominic Raab, his Cabinet colleague Esther McVey and several junior ministers resigned their posts because of their disagreement with the contents of the document.
On 19 December 2018, the EU Commission announced its "no-deal" Contingency Action Plan in specific sectors, in respect of the UK leaving the European Union "in 100 days' time."
In the wake of the United Kingdom's vote to leave the European Union, the Department for International Trade (DIT) for striking and extending trade agreements between the UK and non-EU states was created by Prime Minister Theresa May, shortly after she took office on 13 July 2016. By 2017, it employed about 200 trade negotiators and was overseen by the Secretary of State for International Trade, currently Liam Fox. In March 2019, the UK government announced that it would cut many import tariffs to zero, in the event of a no-deal Brexit. The Confederation of British Industry said the move would be a "sledgehammer for our economy", and the National Farmer's Union was also highly critical. Additionally, the plan appears to breach standard WTO rules.
UK Government's legal advice
Following an unprecedented vote on 4 December 2018, MPs ruled that the UK government was in contempt of parliament for refusing to provide to Parliament, the full legal advice it had been given on the effect of its proposed terms for withdrawal. The key point within the advice covered the legal effect of the "backstop" agreement governing Northern Ireland, the Republic of Ireland and the rest of the UK, in regard to the customs border between the EU and UK, and its implications for the Good Friday agreement which had led to the end of the Troubles in Northern Ireland, and specifically, whether the UK would be certain of being able to leave the EU in a practical sense, under the draft proposals.
The following day, the advice was published. The question asked was, "What is the legal effect of the UK agreeing to the Protocol to the Withdrawal Agreement on Ireland and Northern Ireland in particular its effect in conjunction with Articles 5 and 184 of the main Withdrawal Agreement?" The advice given was that:
- The Protocol is binding on the UK and EU [para 3], and anticipates a final future resolution of the border and customs issues being reached [para 5,12,13]. But "the Protocol is intended to subsist even when negotiations have clearly broken down" [para 16] and "In conclusion, the current drafting of the Protocol ... does not provide for a mechanism that is likely to enable the UK lawfully to exit the UK wide customs union without a subsequent agreement. This remains the case even if parties are still negotiating many years later, and even if the parties believe that talks have clearly broken down and there is no prospect of a future relationship agreement." [para 30]
Delay of vote on Withdrawal Agreement
On 10 December 2018, the Prime Minister postponed the vote in the House of Commons on her Brexit deal. The announcement came minutes after the Prime Minister's Office confirmed the vote would be going ahead. Faced with the prospect of a defeat in the House of Commons, this option gave May more time to negotiate with Conservative backbenchers and the EU, even though they had ruled out further discussions. The decision was met with calls from many Welsh Labour MPs for a motion of no confidence in the Government. The Leader of the Opposition, Jeremy Corbyn, described the government as being in "disarray".
The European Research Group, the segment of the Conservative Party that favours a "hard" Brexit, opposes the Prime Minister's proposed Withdrawal Agreement treaty. Its members strongly object to the Withdrawal Agreement's inclusion of the Irish backstop. ERG members also object to the proposed £39 billion financial settlement with the European Union and state that the agreement would result in the UK's agreement to continuing to follow EU regulations in major policy areas; and to the continuing jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice over interpretation of the agreement and of European law still applicable to the UK.
Sir Ivan Rogers, the UK ambassador to the EU at the time of the 2016 referendum, publicly commented on 13 December 2018 that the EU was always adroit at reframing things that have already been agreed, such as the Irish backstop, in ways that "make the medicine slip down".
Vote on Withdrawal Agreement
On 15 January 2019, the House of Commons voted 432 to 202 against the deal, which was the largest majority against a United Kingdom government ever. Soon after, a motion of no confidence in Her Majesty's Government was tabled by the opposition, which was rejected by 325 votes to 306.
Second vote on Withdrawal Agreement
On 24 February, Theresa May announced that the next vote on the withdrawal agreement would be on 12 March 2019, 17 days away from Brexit. The deal was voted against 391 to 242, a loss of 149 votes down from 230 from when the deal was proposed in January.
On 20 March 2019, the Prime Minister Theresa May wrote to European Council President Donald Tusk requesting that Brexit be postponed until 30 June 2019. On 21 March 2019, May presented her case to a European Council summit meeting in Brussels. After May left the meeting, a discussion amongst the remaining EU leaders resulted in the rejection of 30 June date and offered instead a choice of two new alternative Brexit dates. On 22 March 2019 the extension options were agreed between the UK government and the European Council. The first alternative offered was that if MPs rejected May's deal in the next week, Brexit would be due to occur by 12 April 2019, with, or without, a deal—or alternatively another extension be asked for and a commitment to participate in the 2019 European Parliament elections given. The second alternative offered was that if MPs approved May's deal, Brexit would be due to occur on 22 May 2019. The later date was the day before the start of European Parliament elections. After the government deemed unwarranted the concerns over the legality of the proposed change (due to its containing two possible exit dates) the previous day, on 27 March 2019 both the Lords (without a vote) and the Commons (by 441 to 105) approved the statutory instrument changing the exit date to 22 May 2019 if a withdrawal deal is approved, or 12 April 2019 if it is not. The amendment was then signed into law at 12:40 p.m. the next day.
Third vote on Withdrawal Agreement
On 18 March 2019, the Speaker informed the House of Commons that a third meaningful vote could only be held on a motion that was significantly different from the previous one, citing parliamentary precedents going back to 1604.
The Withdrawal Agreement was brought back to the House without the attached understandings on 29 March. The Government's motion of support for the Withdrawal Agreement was lost by 344 votes to 286, a loss of 58 votes down from 149 from when the deal was proposed on 12 March.
Following the failure of UK Parliament to approve the Withdrawal Agreement by 29 March, the UK was now legally due to leave the EU on 12 April 2019. On 10 April 2019, late-night talks in Brussels resulted in another extension to 31 October 2019; Theresa May had again only requested an extension until 30 June. Under the terms of this new extension, if the Withdrawal Agreement is passed before October, Brexit would occur on the first day of the subsequent month. However, the UK would now be obligated to hold European Parliament elections in May, or leave the EU on 1 June without a deal.
Other post-referendum political developments
Domestic legislation after Article 50 notification
European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018
In October 2016, Theresa May promised a "Great Repeal Bill", which would repeal the European Communities Act 1972 and restate in UK law all enactments previously in force under EU law. Subsequently renamed the European Union (Withdrawal) bill, it was introduced to the House of Commons on 13 July 2017.
On 12 September 2017, the bill passed its first vote and second reading by a margin of 326 votes to 290 votes in the House of Commons. The bill was further amended on a series of votes in both Houses of Parliament. After the Act became law on 26 June 2018, the European Council decided on 29 June to renew its call on Member States and Union institutions to step up their work on preparedness at all levels and for all outcomes.
The Withdrawal Act fixed the period ending 21 January 2019 for the government to decide on how to proceed if the negotiations have not reached agreement in principle on both the withdrawal arrangements and the framework for the future relationship between the UK and EU; while, alternatively, making future ratification of the withdrawal agreement as a treaty between the UK and EU depend upon the prior enactment of another act of Parliament for approving the final terms of withdrawal when the current Brexit negotiations are completed. In any event, the act does not alter the two-year period for negotiating allowed by Article 50 that ends at the latest on 29 March 2019 if the UK has not by then ratified a withdrawal agreement or agreed a prolongation of the negotiating period.
The Withdrawal Act which became law in June 2018 allows for various outcomes including no negotiated settlement. It authorises the government to bring into force, by order made under section 25, the provisions that fix "exit day" and the repeal of the European Communities Act 1972, but exit day must be the same day and time as when the EU Treaties are to cease to apply to the UK.
Additional government bills
A report published in March 2017 by the Institute for Government commented that, in addition to the European Union (Withdrawal) bill, primary and secondary legislation will be needed to cover the gaps in policy areas such as customs, immigration and agriculture. The report also commented that the role of the devolved legislatures was unclear, and could cause problems, and as many as 15 new additional Brexit Bills may be required, which would involve strict prioritisation and limiting Parliamentary time for in-depth examination of new legislation.
In 2016 and 2017, the House of Lords published a series of reports on Brexit-related subjects, including:
Voting on the final outcome
Replying to questions at a parliamentary committee about Parliament's involvement in voting on the outcome of the negotiations with the EU, the Prime Minister said that "delivering on the vote of the British people to leave the European Union" was her priority. The shadow Brexit secretary, Keir Starmer, commented that the government did not want a vote at the beginning of the process, to trigger Article 50, nor a vote at the end.
2017 British general election
A general election was held on 8 June 2017, announced at short notice by the new Prime Minister Theresa May. The Conservative Party, Labour and UKIP made manifesto pledges to implement the referendum, although the Labour manifesto differed in its approach to Brexit negotiations, such as unilaterally offering permanent residence to EU immigrants. The Liberal Democrat Party and the Green Party manifestos proposed a policy of remaining in the EU via a second referendum. The Scottish National Party manifesto proposed a policy of waiting for the outcome of the Brexit negotiations and then holding a referendum on Scottish independence. Compared to the 2015 general election, the Conservatives gained votes (but nevertheless lost seats and their majority in the House of Commons). Labour gained significantly on votes and seats, retaining its position as the second-largest party. The Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) and Sinn Féin also made gains in votes and seats. Parties losing votes included the SNP, Liberals, Greens, and especially UKIP.
On 26 June 2017, Conservatives and the DUP reached a confidence and supply agreement whereby the DUP would back the Conservatives in key votes in the House of Commons over the course of the parliament. The agreement included additional funding of £1 billion for Northern Ireland, highlighted mutual support for Brexit and national security, expressed commitment to the Good Friday Agreement, and indicated that policies such as the state pension triple lock and Winter Fuel Payments would be maintained.
Opinion polling tended to show a plurality of support for Brexit after the referendum and until the 2017 General Election. Since then, opinion polls have tended to show a plurality of support for remaining in the EU or for the view that Brexit was a mistake. This seems to be largely due to a preference for remaining in the EU among those who did not vote in 2016's referendum (some of whom were too young to vote at the time). In March 2019, a petition submitted to the UK Parliament petitions website, calling on the government to revoke Article 50 and stay in the European Union, reached a record-level of six million signatures.
Whether the UK leaves with a withdrawal agreement or alternatively without any withdrawal agreement ("no deal" Brexit) will affect future impacts, particularly in connection with the location of EU agencies and the regulation and control of cross-border outward and inward movements of persons and animals, of goods for export and import, and of financial and other transactions.
According to a 2016 study by Ken Mayhew, Emeritus Professor of Education and Economic Performance at Oxford University, Brexit posed the following threats to higher education: "loss of research funding from EU sources; loss of students from other EU member states; the impact on the ability of the sector to hire academic staff from EU member states; and the impact on the ability of UK students to study abroad." The UK received more from the European agencies and institutions for research than it financially contributed with universities getting just over 10% of their research income from the European agencies and institutions. All funding for net beneficiaries from European agencies and institutions, including universities, was guaranteed by the British government in August 2016. Before the funding announcement, a newspaper investigation reported that some research projects were reluctant to include British researchers due to uncertainties over funding. Currently the UK is part of the European Research Area and the UK is likely to wish to remain an associated member.
Border between the UK and Republic of Ireland
There is concern about whether the border between the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland becomes a "hard border" with customs and passport checks on the border, and whether this could affect the Good Friday Agreement that brought peace to Northern Ireland. In order to forestall this the European Union proposed a "backstop agreement" within the Withdrawal Agreement that would put Northern Ireland under a range of EU rules in order to forestall the need for border checks. Although the UK government has signed off on proposals including the backstop, it regards the idea of having EU rules applying in Northern Ireland only as a threat to the integrity of the UK, and also does not want the UK as a whole to be subject to EU rules and the customs union indefinitely.
Until October 2019, both the UK and Ireland will be members of the EU, and therefore both are in the Customs Union and the Single Market. There is freedom of movement for all EU nationals within the Common Travel Area and there are no customs or fixed immigration controls at the border. Since 2005, the border has been essentially invisible. Following Brexit, the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland will become a land border between the EU and a non-EU state which may entail checks on goods at the border or at Irish ports, depending on the co-operation and alignment of regulations between the two sides. It is therefore possible that the border will return to being a "hard" one, with fewer, controlled, crossing posts and a customs infrastructure. Both the EU and the UK have agreed this should be avoided. A February 2019 report by Irish Senator Mark Daly and two UNESCO chairmen indicated that reinstating a hard border would result in the return of violence.
In March 2019, the UK government announced that it would not perform customs checks at the Irish border after a no-deal Brexit and acknowledged that that might present a smuggling risk. On 17 March the President of Ireland signed into law the Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union (Consequential Provisions) Act 2019.
Border with France
The President of the Regional Council of Hauts-de-France, Xavier Bertrand, stated in February 2016 that "If Britain leaves Europe, right away the border will leave Calais and go to Dover. We will not continue to guard the border for Britain if it's no longer in the European Union," indicating that the juxtaposed controls would end with a leave vote. French Finance Minister Emmanuel Macron also suggested the agreement would be "threatened" by a leave vote. These claims have been disputed, as the Le Touquet 2003 treaty enabling juxtaposed controls was not an EU treaty, and would not be legally void upon leaving.
After the Brexit vote, Xavier Bertrand asked François Hollande to renegotiate the Touquet agreement, which can be terminated by either party with two years' notice. Hollande rejected the suggestion, and Bernard Cazeneuve, the French Interior Minister, confirmed there would be "no changes to the accord."
Analysts and commentators expect that Brexit will have damaging immediate and longer term effects on the economies of the UK and at least part of the 27 other EU member states. In particular, there is a broad consensus among economists and in the economic literature that Brexit will likely reduce the UK's real per capita income in the medium and long term, and that the Brexit referendum itself damaged the economy.[b] Studies on effects since the referendum show a reduction in GDP, trade and investment, as well as household losses from increased inflation.
According to one study, the referendum result had pushed up UK inflation by 1.7 percentage points in 2017, leading to an annual cost of £404 for the average British household. Studies published in 2018, estimated that the economic costs of the Brexit vote were 2% of GDP, or 2.5% of GDP. According to a December 2017 Financial Times analysis, the Brexit referendum results had reduced national British income by between 0.6% and 1.3%. A 2018 analysis by Stanford University and Nottingham University economists estimated that uncertainty around Brexit reduced investment by businesses by approximately 6 percentage points and caused an employment reduction by 1.5 percentage points. A number of studies found that Brexit-induced uncertainty about the UK's future trade policy reduced British international trade from June 2016 onwards. A 2019 analysis found that British firms substantially increased offshoring to the European Union after the Brexit referendum, whereas European firms reduced new investments in the UK.
— In the long term
There is overwhelming or near-unanimous agreement among economists that leaving the European Union will adversely affect the British economy in the medium- and long-term.[c] Surveys of economists in 2016 showed overwhelming agreement that Brexit would likely reduce the UK's real per-capita income level. 2019 and 2017 surveys of existing academic research found that the credible estimates ranged between GDP losses of 1.2–4.5% for the UK, and a cost of between 1–10% of the UK's income per capita. These estimates differ depending on whether the UK exits the EU with a hard Brexit or soft Brexit. In January 2018, the UK government's own Brexit analysis was leaked; it showed that UK economic growth would be stunted by 2–8% for at least 15 years following Brexit, depending on the leave scenario.
According to most economists, EU membership has a strong positive effect on trade and as a result the UK's trade would be worse off if it left the EU. According to a study by University of Cambridge economists, under a "hard Brexit" whereby the UK reverts to WTO rules, one-third of UK exports to the EU would be tariff-free, one-quarter would face high trade barriers and other exports risk tariffs in the range of 1–10%. A 2017 study found that "almost all UK regions are systematically more vulnerable to Brexit than regions in any other country." A 2017 study examining the economic impact of Brexit-induced reductions in migration" found that there would likely be "a significant negative impact on UK GDP per capita (and GDP), with marginal positive impacts on wages in the low-skill service sector." It is unclear how changes in trade and foreign investment will interact with immigration, but these changes are likely to be important.
With Brexit, the EU would lose its second-largest economy, the country with the third-largest population and "the financial capital of the world", as the German newspaper Münchner Merkur put it. Furthermore, the EU would lose its second-largest net contributor to the EU budget (2015: Germany €14.3 billion, United Kingdom €11.5 billion, France €5.5 billion). Thus, the departure of Britain would result in an additional financial burden for the remaining net contributors, unless the budget is reduced accordingly: Germany, for example, would have to pay an additional €4.5 billion for 2019 and again for 2020; in addition, the UK would no longer be a shareholder in the European Investment Bank, in which only EU members can participate. Britain's share amounts to 16%, €39.2 billion (2013), which Britain would withdraw unless there is an EU treaty change.
— In the short term
Short-term macroeconomic forecasts by the Bank of England and other banks of what would happen immediately after the Brexit referendum were too pessimistic. The assessments assumed that the referendum results would create greater uncertainty in markets and reduce consumer confidence more than it did. A number of economists noted that short-term macroeconomic forecasts are generally considered unreliable and that they are something that academic economists do not do, unlike banks. Economists have compared short-term economic forecasts to weather forecasts whereas the long-term economic forecasts are akin to climate forecasts: the methodologies used in long-term forecasts are "well-established and robust".
Regional inequality in UK
Studies on the economic impact that different forms of Brexit will have on different parts of the country indicate that Brexit will exacerbate regional economic inequality in the UK, as already struggling regions will be hardest hit by Brexit.
UK financial sector
Economists have warned that London’s future as an international financial centre depends on whether the UK will obtain passporting rights for British banks from the European Union. If banks located in the UK cannot obtain passporting rights, they have strong incentives to relocate to financial centres within the EU. According to John Armour, Professor of Law and Finance at Oxford University, "a 'soft' Brexit, whereby the UK leaves the EU but remains in the single market, would be a lower-risk option for the British financial industry than other Brexit options, because it would enable financial services firms to continue to rely on regulatory passporting rights."
According to a 2017 study by University of Exeter and Chatham House researchers, there are considerable benefits for the UK to be integrated into the European energy market. The study notes, "if the UK wants to enjoy the economic benefits of remaining part of what is an increasingly integrated European electricity market then, as European legislation is currently drafted, it will not only have to forgo an element of autonomy through accepting legislation and regulations made collectively at the EU level, but it will also lose much of its voice in that decision making process, effectively becoming a rule-taker rather than a rule-maker."
European Union institutions
Council of the European Union
Analyses indicate that the departure of the relatively economically liberal UK will reduce the ability of remaining economically liberal countries to block measures in the Council of the European Union. According to the Lisbon Treaty (2009), decisions of the Council are made by qualified majority voting, which means that a majority view can be blocked should at least four members of the Council, representing at least 35% of the population of the Union, choose to do so. In many policy votes, Britain, allied with other northern EU allies (Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands, the Scandinavian and the Baltic states), had a blocking minority of 35%.
UK MEPs are expected to retain full rights to participate in the European Parliament up to the Article 50 deadline. However, there have been discussions about excluding UK MEPs from key committee positions.
The EU will need to decide on the revised apportionment of seats in the European Parliament in time for the next European Parliament election to be held in May 2019 (with the parliamentary term starting in June), when the United Kingdom's 73 MEPs will have vacated their seats. In April 2017, a group of European lawmakers discussed what should be done about the vacated seats. One plan, supported by Gianni Pittella and Emmanuel Macron, is to replace the 73 seats with a pan-European constituency list; other options which were considered include dropping the British seats without replacement, and reassigning some or all of the existing seats from other countries to reduce inequality of representation.
The combined EU fishing fleets land about 6 million tonnes of fish per year, of which about 3 million tonnes are from UK waters. The UK's share of the overall EU fishing catch is only 750,000 tonnes (830,000 tons). This proportion is determined by the London Fisheries Convention of 1964 and by the EU's Common Fisheries Policy. The UK government announced in July 2017 that it would end the 1964 convention in 2019. Loss of access to UK waters will particularly affect the Irish fishing industry which obtains a third of its catch there.
According to an analysis by researchers at Wageningen University and Research, Brexit would lead to higher prices in seafood for consumers (because the UK imports most of its seafood). British fishermen would be able to catch more fish, but the price for UK fish would decline. As a result, the analysis found that Brexit would result in a "lose-lose situation" for both the UK and the EU, and for both British consumers and the fishing industry. According to a 2018 study, "Brexit poses a major challenge to the stability of European fisheries management. Until now, neighbouring EU Member States have shared the bounty of the living resources of the seas around Britain. Taking full responsibility for the regulation of fisheries within the UK's Exclusive Economic Zone will cut across longstanding relationships, potentially putting at risk recent recovery and future sustainability of shared fish stocks."
Gibraltar and Spain
Gibraltar is outside the European Union's common customs area and common commercial policy and so has a customs border with Spain. Nevertheless, the territory remains within the European Union until Brexit is complete.
During the Brexit referendum campaign, the Chief Minister of Gibraltar warned that Brexit posed a threat to Gibraltar's safety. Gibraltar voted overwhelmingly (96 per cent) to remain in the EU. After the result, Spain's Foreign Minister renewed calls for joint Spanish–British control of the peninsula. These calls were strongly rebuffed by Gibraltar's Chief Minister and questions were raised over the future of free-flowing traffic at the Gibraltar–Spain border. The UK government states it will only negotiate on the sovereignty of Gibraltar with the consent of its people.
In February 2018, Sir Joe Bossano, Gibraltar's Minister for Enterprise, Training, Employment and Health and Safety (and former Chief Minister) expressed frustration at the EU's attitude, suggesting that Spain was being offered a veto, adding "It's enough to convert me from a supporter of the European Union into a Brexiteer".
In April 2018, Spanish Foreign Minister Alfonso Dastis said that the Spanish had a long-term aim of "recovering" Gibraltar, but that Spain would not hold Gibraltar as a "hostage" to the EU negotiations. In 2018, a new Spanish government stated that its policy on the issue remained the same as Dastis's.
A 2019 study in the Lancet suggested that Brexit would have an adverse impact on health in the UK under every Brexit scenario, but that a No-Deal Brexit would have the worst impact. The study found that Brexit would deplete the National Health Service (NHS) workforce, create uncertainties regarding care for British nationals living in the EU, and put at risk access to vaccines, equipment, and medicines.
The UK's exit from the European Union will leave Ireland and Cyprus as the only two remaining common law jurisdictions in the EU. Paul Gallagher, a former Attorney General of Ireland, has suggested this will isolate those countries and deprive them of a powerful partner that shared a common interest in ensuring that EU legislation was not drafted or interpreted in a way that would be contrary to the principles of the common law. Lucinda Creighton, a former Irish government minister for legal affairs, has said that Ireland relies on the "bureaucratic capacity of the UK" to understand, influence and implement EU legislation.
Studies estimating the long-term impact of Brexit on immigration note that many factors affect future migration flows but that Brexit and the end of free movement will likely result in a large decline in immigration from EEA countries to the UK. Will Somerville of the Migration Policy Institute estimated immediately after the referendum that the UK "would continue to receive 500,000 or more immigrants (from EU and non-EU countries taken together) per year, with annual net migration around 200,000". The decline in EEA immigration is likely to have an adverse impact on the British health sector. According to the New York Times, Brexit "seems certain" to make it harder and costlier for the NHS, which already suffers from chronic understaffing, to recruit nurses, midwives and doctors from the rest of Europe.
Official figures for June 2017 (published in February 2018) showed that net non-British EU immigration to the UK slowed to about 100,000 immigrants per year (corresponding to the immigration level of 2014) while immigration from outside the European Union increased. Taken together, the two inflows into the UK resulted in an only slightly reduced net immigration of 230,000 newcomers in the year to June 2017. The Head of the Office of National Statistics suggested that Brexit could well be a factor for the slowdown in EU immigration, but cautioned there might be other reasons. The number of non-British EU nurses registering with the NHS fell from 1,304 in July 2016 to 46 in April 2017.
Since the referendum, British citizens have attempted to ensure their retention of EU citizenship via a number of different mechanisms, including applying to other EU member states for citizenship, and petitioning the European Commission.
Currently, EEA sportspersons face minimal bureaucracy to play or perform in the UK. After Brexit, any foreigner wanting to do so more than temporarily could need a work permit. Such work permits can be tricky to obtain, especially for young or lower ranked players. Conversely, British nationals playing in EEA states may encounter similar obstacles where none exist today.
Relocation of agencies
Brexit requires relocating the offices and staff of the European Medicines Agency and European Banking Authority, currently based in London. The agencies together employ more than 1,000 people and will respectively relocate to Amsterdam and Paris. The EU is also considering restricting the clearing of euro-denominated trades to eurozone jurisdictions, which would end London's dominance in this sector.
Flights between the UK and the 27 EU countries are enshrined into the European Common Aviation Area. The UK Government's aviation guidance document states that post-Brexit: "UK and EU licensed airlines would lose the automatic right to operate air services between the UK and the EU without seeking advance permission. This would mean that airlines operating between the UK and the EU would need to seek individual permissions to operate." In the event that no agreement can be made between the UK and EU, it is the intention of the UK Government to allow permission for existing flights to the UK to remain unimpeded in the expectation this will be reciprocated by EU countries. The loss of automatic access to the European Common Aviation Area will affect airlines; for instance a British registered airline cannot operate intra-EU flights, nor can a European registered airline operate domestic UK flights. Some British airlines created European divisions to resolve the issue. The European Aviation Safety Agency will no longer cover UK airlines.
The UK has sought to replace the existing ECAA partnerships that the EU has with 17 non-EU countries. By the end of 2018, the UK had concluded individual air service agreements (ASA) with the United States, Canada Switzerland, Albania, Georgia, Iceland, Israel, Kosovo, Montenegro and Morocco. Flights to and from these countries will continue as scheduled post-Brexit.
The UK has separate bilateral air service agreements (ASA) with 111 countries, which permit flights to and from the country. As a result, there will there will be no change post-Brexit for airlines operating in these countries.
The French minister for European Affairs, Nathalie Loiseau, said in September 2018 that trains in the Channel Tunnel may no longer be allowed into France in the event of a no-deal Brexit. Discussions were carried out in October between the British Department for Transport and the rail transport authorities of France, Belgium and the Netherlands. A temporary authorisation for three months was agreed in February 2019, ensuring transport continuity in the event of a no-deal Brexit.
The Vienna Convention on Road Traffic is written by the UN, not the EU, allowing road traffic between the UK and EU even without a deal.
The UK will remain in the European Common Transit Convention (CTC) after Brexit. This would apply to any new trading relationship with the EU, including after exit with no Withdrawal Agreement treaty. The CTC applies to moving goods between the EU member states, the EFTA countries (Iceland, Norway, Liechtenstein and Switzerland) as well as Turkey, Macedonia and Serbia. The CTC, with its supplementary Convention on the Simplification of Formalities in the Trade of Goods, reduces administrative burdens on traders by removing the need for additional import/export declarations when transiting customs territories, and provides cashflow benefits by allowing the movement of goods across a customs territory without the payment of duties until the final destination.
In the event of a "no-deal" Brexit, the number of permits available to haulage drivers will be "severely limited": the Department for Transport proposes to allocate these by lottery. Even with a customs union, the experience of Turkish hauliers suggests that significant difficulties and delays will occur both at the border and within some countries.
As suggested by the Scottish Government before the referendum, the First Minister of Scotland announced that officials were planning an independence referendum due to the result of Scotland voting to remain in the European Union when England and Wales voted to leave. In March 2017, the SNP leader and First Minister Nicola Sturgeon requested a second Scottish independence referendum in 2018 or 2019 (before Britain's formal exit from the EU). The UK Prime Minister immediately rejected the requested timing, but not the referendum itself. The referendum was approved by the Scottish Parliament on 28 March 2017. Sturgeon called for a "phased return" of an independent Scotland back to the EU.
After the referendum, First Minister Sturgeon suggested that Scotland might refuse consent for legislation required to leave the EU, though some lawyers argued that Scotland cannot block Brexit.
On 21 March 2018, the Scottish Parliament passed the Scottish Continuity Bill. This was passed due to stalling negotiations between the Scottish Government and the British Government on where powers within devolved policy areas should lie after exit day from the European Union. This Act allows for all devolved policy areas to remain within the remit of the Scottish Parliament and reduces the executive power upon exit day that the UK Withdrawal Bill provides for Ministers of the Crown. The Bill gained Royal Assent on 28 April 2018.
Concerns have been raised that Brexit might create security problems for the UK. In particular in law enforcement and counterterrorism where the UK could use the European Union's databases on individuals crossing the British border. Security experts have credited the EU's information-sharing databases with helping to foil terrorist plots. British leaders have expressed support for retaining access to those information-sharing databases, but it could be complicated to obtain that access as a non-member of the EU. Brexit would also complicate extradition requests. Under a hard Brexit scenario, the UK would lose access to basic law enforcement tools, such as databases comprising European plane travel records, vehicle registrations, fingerprints and DNA profiles.
UK bilateral international agreements
The Financial Times said that there were approximately 759 international agreements, spanning 168 non-EU countries, that the UK would no longer be a party to upon leaving the EU. This figure does not include World Trade Organization or United Nations opt-in accords, and excludes "narrow agreements", which may also have to be renegotiated.
UK-EU relationship post-Brexit
The UK's post-Brexit relationship with the European Union could take several forms. A research paper presented to the UK Parliament in July 2013 proposed a number of alternatives to being a member state which would continue to allow access to the EU internal market. These include remaining in the European Economic Area, negotiating deep bilateral agreements on the Swiss model, or exit from the EU without EEA membership or a trade agreement under the WTO Option. There may be an interim deal between the time the UK leaves the EU and when the final relationship comes in force.
UK relations with CANZUK countries
Pro-Brexit activists and politicians have argued that for negotiating trade and migration agreements with the "CANZUK" countries—those of Canada, Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom. Numerous academics have criticised this alternative for EU membership as "post-imperial nostalgia". Economists note that distance reduces trade, a key aspect of the gravity model of trade, which means that even if the UK could obtain similar trade terms with the CANZUK countries as it had as part of the Single Market, it would be far less valuable to the UK.
World Trade Organization
Questions have arisen over how existing international arrangements with the EU under World Trade Organization (WTO) terms should evolve. Some countries—such as Australia and the United States—wish to challenge the basis for division (i.e., division between the UK and the continuing European Union) of the trade schedules previously agreed between them and the EU, because it reduces their flexibility.
Brexit has inspired many creative works, such as murals, sculptures, novels, plays, movies and video games. The response of British artists and writers to Brexit has in general been negative, reflecting a reported overwhelming percentage of people involved in Britain's creative industries voting against leaving the European Union.
- Causes of the vote in favour of Brexit
- Dutch withdrawal from the European Union
- European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Bill 2017–19
- Greek withdrawal from the eurozone
- Integration of non-EU states
- International reactions to the 2016 United Kingdom European Union membership referendum
- Multi-speed Europe
- Interpretation of EU Treaty law by European Court of Justice
- Opposition to Brexit in the United Kingdom
- Referendums related to the European Union
- Withdrawal of Greenland from the European Communities
- Hall, Damien (11 August 2017). "'Breksit' or 'bregzit'? The question that divides a nation". The Conversation.
- Tusk, Donald (10 April 2019). "EU27/UK have agreed a flexible extension until 31 October. This means additional six months for the UK to find the best possible solution". @eucopresident. Twitter. Retrieved 11 April 2019.
- Goodman, Peter S. (20 May 2016). "'Brexit,' a Feel-Good Vote That Could Sink Britain's Economy". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 28 November 2017.
finding economists who say they believe that a Brexit will spur the British economy is like looking for a doctor who thinks forswearing vegetables is the key to a long life
- Sampson, Thomas (2017). "Brexit: The Economics of International Disintegration". Journal of Economic Perspectives. 31 (4): 163–184. doi:10.1257/jep.31.4.163. ISSN 0895-3309.
The results I summarize in this section focus on long-run effects and have a forecast horizon of 10 or more years after Brexit occurs. Less is known about the likely dynamics of the transition process or the extent to which economic uncertainty and anticipation effects will impact the economies of the United Kingdom or the European Union in advance of Brexit.
- Baldwin, Richard (31 July 2016). "Brexit Beckons: Thinking ahead by leading economists". VoxEU.org. Retrieved 22 November 2017.
On 23 June 2016, 52% of British voters decided that being the first country ever to leave the EU was a price worth paying for 'taking back control', despite advice from economists clearly showing that Brexit would make the UK 'permanently poorer' (HM Treasury 2016). The extent of agreement among economists on the costs of Brexit was extraordinary: forecast after forecast supported similar conclusions (which have so far proved accurate in the aftermath of the Brexit vote).
- "Brexit survey". igmchicago.org. Retrieved 1 November 2017.
- "Brexit survey II". igmchicago.org. Retrieved 1 November 2017.
- Sodha, Sonia; Helm, Toby; Inman, Phillip (28 May 2016). "Economists overwhelmingly reject Brexit in boost for Cameron". The Observer. ISSN 0029-7712. Retrieved 1 November 2017.
- "Most economists still pessimistic about effects of Brexit". Financial Times. Retrieved 22 November 2017.
- "Subscribe to read". Financial Times. Retrieved 22 November 2017.
Unlike the short-term effects of Brexit, which have been better than most had predicted, most economists say the ultimate impact of leaving the EU still appears likely to be more negative than positive. But the one thing almost all agree upon is that no one will know how big the effects are for some time.
- Wren-Lewis, Simon. "Why is the academic consensus on the cost of Brexit being ignored?". The Conversation. Retrieved 22 November 2017.
- "Brexit to Hit Jobs, Wealth and Output for Years to Come, Economists Say". Bloomberg L.P. 22 February 2017. Retrieved 22 November 2017.
The U.K. economy may be paying for Brexit for a long time to come... It won't mean Armageddon, but the broad consensus among economists—whose predictions about the initial fallout were largely too pessimistic—is for a prolonged effect that will ultimately diminish output, jobs and wealth to some degree.
- Johnson, Paul; Mitchell, Ian (1 March 2017). "The Brexit vote, economics, and economic policy". Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 33 (suppl_1): S12–S21. doi:10.1093/oxrep/grx017. ISSN 0266-903X.
- "Most economists say Brexit will hurt the economy – but one disagrees". The Economist. Retrieved 22 November 2017.
- "This is the real reason the UK's economic forecasts look so bad". The Independent. 23 November 2017. Retrieved 28 November 2017.
One thing economists do generally agree on is that leaving the European Union and putting new trade barriers between Britain and our largest and closest trading partners is extremely unlikely to boost UK productivity growth—and is far more likely to slow it
- Al Jazeera. (2018). Brexit jargon: From backstop to no deal, 17 key terms explained (Al Jazeera). Retrieved 29 March 2019.
- BBC. (2019). Brexit: Jargon-busting guide to the key terms (BBC). Retrieved 29 March 2019.
- Blitz, James (6 September 2018). "The danger of a 'blind Brexit'". Financial Times. Retrieved 6 October 2018.
- Castle, Stephen (20 September 2018). "As Britain's departure nears, talk grows of a 'blind Brexit'". The New York Times. p. A10. Retrieved 6 October 2018.
- Boffey, Daniel (3 September 2018). "Emmanuel Macron stresses opposition to 'blind Brexit'". The Guardian. Retrieved 6 October 2018.
- Bevington, Matthew (19 September 2018). "Why talk is growing around "blind Brexit"". Prospect. Retrieved 6 October 2018.
- "Britain and the EU: A Brixit looms". The Economist. 21 June 2012. Retrieved 25 June 2016.
- Ro, Christine. "How Brexit changed the English language". www.bbc.com. Retrieved 11 April 2019.
- Wilding, Peter (15 May 2012). "Stumbling towards the Brexit". BlogActiv.eu. Retrieved 22 July 2016.
- Friederichsen, Paul (27 June 2016). "Coining catchy "Brexit" term helped Brits determine EU vote". Daily News. New York. Retrieved 22 July 2016.
- "Brexit, n." OED Online. Oxford University Press, March 2017. Web. 9 May 2017.
- Krause-Jackson, Flavia (28 June 2015). "Economist Who Coined 'Grexit' Now Says Greece Will Stay in Euro". Bloomberg Business.; Atkins, Ralph (23 December 2012). "A year in a word: Grexit". Financial Times.; "'Grexit' –Wer hat's erfunden?". citifirst.com.
- Hjelmgaard, Kim; Onyanga-Omara, Jane (22 February 2016). "Explainer: The what, when, and why of "Brexit"". USA Today. Retrieved 25 June 2016.
- "Would Canada-plus do the trick?". Retrieved 17 November 2018.
- Stewart, Heather (29 August 2018). "No-deal Brexit is only alternative to Chequers plan, says Lidington". The Guardian. Retrieved 31 August 2018.
- Kentish, Benjamin (30 August 2018). "Brexit: David Lidington warns EU that Chequers plan is only alternative to no-deal". The Independent. Retrieved 31 August 2018.
- "Draft Political Declaration setting out the framework for the future relationship between the United Kingdom and the European Union". gov.uk. Department for Exiting the European Union via GOV.UK. 22 November 2018. Retrieved 23 November 2018.
- Keep, Matthew (12 December 2017). "Brexit: the exit bill" (PDF). House of Commons Library. CBP-8039. Retrieved 15 February 2018.
When the UK leaves the EU it is expected to make a contribution towards the EU's outstanding financial commitments—spending that was agreed while the UK was a member. The media have labelled this as an 'exit bill' or 'divorce bill', the EU see it as a matter of 'settling the accounts'. The issue has been discussed in the first phase of Brexit negotiations under the title of the 'single financial settlement' (the settlement).
- "PM to discuss no-deal Brexit plans". BBC News. 13 September 2018.
- "Economic and Fiscal Outlook" (PDF). Office for Budget Responsibility. March 2019. p. 111. Retrieved 24 March 2019.
- ""Hard" Brexit most likely outcome for UK leaving EU, says S&P". Reuters. 11 November 2016. Retrieved 18 March 2017.
- Morris, Hugh (25 October 2018). "Air industry chief predicts 'chaos' for holiday flights in event of no-deal Brexit". The Telegraph. Retrieved 26 October 2018.
- "Brexit: What are the options? Alternative Brexit models". BBC News. 15 January 2017. Retrieved 24 February 2017.
- "How Brexit weakens and strengthens Britain's Conservatives". The Economist. Retrieved 3 October 2018.
- Institute for Government. (2019). Indicative votes. Article updated 1 April 2019; retrieved 8 April 2019.
- How did my MP vote on Brexit indicative votes? (First round). BBC News. Published 27 March 2019; retrieved 8 April 2019.
- How did my MP vote on Brexit indicative votes? (Second round). BBC News. Published 1 April 2019; retrieved 8 April 2019.
- "Oxford English Dictionary definition of Leaver". Oxford English Dictionary. Retrieved 18 January 2019.
- Wheeler, Brian (14 December 2017). "Brexit: Can Leavers and Remainers call a Christmas truce?". BBC. Retrieved 18 January 2019.
- Kuenssberg, Laura (7 September 2017). "Brexiteers' letter adds to pressure on May". BBC. Retrieved 1 November 2017.
- Peck, Tom (28 December 2017). UK must pay for French ports after Brexit, Macron to tell May. The Independent.
- Page, Ruth; Busse, Beatrix; Nørgaard, Nina (14 August 2018). Rethinking Language, Text and Context: Interdisciplinary Research in Stylistics in Honour of Michael Toolan. Routledge. ISBN 9781351183208. Retrieved 31 March 2019.
- Page, Ruth; Busse, Beatrix; Nørgaard, Nina (14 August 2018). Rethinking Language, Text and Context: Interdisciplinary Research in Stylistics in Honour of Michael Toolan. Routledge. ISBN 9781351183208. Retrieved 31 March 2019.
- Seargeant, Philip (28 July 2017). "Brexiteers and Broflakes: how language frames political debate". Open University. Retrieved 31 March 2019.
- "Oxford English Dictionary definition of Brexiter". Oxford English Dictionary. Retrieved 26 October 2018.
- "The lexicon of leaving: AP demystifies UK's Brexit jargon". AP NEWS. 29 January 2019. Retrieved 16 March 2019.
- MacIntyre-Kemp, Gordon (25 October 2018). "Why the Brextremist position has hallmarks of a religion". The National. Retrieved 16 March 2019.
- Maguire, Kevin (13 February 2019). "Commons Confidential: The Labour plotters' table". www.newstatesman.com. Retrieved 16 March 2019.
Brextremist bore Peter Bone’s tea room hissy fit during a discussion of the details of Theresa May’s bad plan confirmed that leaving is a religion for the headbangers’ headbanger. As Tory colleagues discussed trade and the backstop, Bone-head startled MPs sitting nearby by raising his arms in the air and wailing: “I don’t care. I don’t care. I just want to leave.”
- Jones, Owen (14 July 2015). "The left must put Britain's EU withdrawal on the agenda". The Guardian. Retrieved 30 April 2019.
- West, Catherine (30 January 2018). "I know a left-wing Brexit is a myth – I wrote the report on why it would never work". The Guardian. Retrieved 20 April 2019.
- Blakeley, Grace (23 November 2018). "Lexit: The left's strategy for Brexit". BBC. Retrieved 30 April 2019.
- Peretz, George (27 December 2018). "Four reasons Jeremy Corbyn is dead wrong about EU state aid". The Guardian. Retrieved 30 April 2019.
- Institute for Government. (2019). Parliament's 'meaningful vote' on Brexit. Article updated 29 March 2019; retrieved 8 April 2019.
- Maguire, Patrick (11 December 2018). "Could the next Tory leader really pull off a "managed no-deal Brexit"?". www.newstatesman.com.
- Foster, Peter (18 December 2018). "Managed no deal: What exactly does it mean for Brexit – and what will happen?". The Telegraph.
- "What is a ‘no deal’ Brexit?" 
- "The Norway model is back on the Brexit agenda – here's what that means". businessinsider.com. Retrieved 17 November 2018.
- "Remainer (definition)". oxforddictionaries.com. Oxford English Dictionary. Retrieved 31 August 2018.
- "remoaner noun - Definition, pictures, pronunciation and usage notes". www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com. Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary.
a name given to a person who believes that the UK should remain in the European Union and does not support Brexit: - The journalist doesn't mind being called a Remoaner, as it tells her that her opponents, the Brexiteers, are getting desperate.
- Institute for Government. (2019). How would a second referendum on Brexit happen? Article updated 22 March 2019; retrieved 23 March 2019.
- "Theresa May Wields Threat of 'Slow Brexit' in Final Bid for Support". Bloomberg. Retrieved 31 March 2019.
- "Theresa May warns of 'slow Brexit' as MPs vote to grab the reins". Metro. 26 March 2019.
- "1967: De Gaulle says "non" to Britain – again". BBC News. 27 November 1976. Retrieved 9 March 2016.
- "Into Europe". Parliament of the United Kingdom. Retrieved 25 February 2017.
- "English text of EU Accession Treaty 1972, Cmnd. 7463" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 December 2016. Retrieved 24 February 2017.
- "1973: Britain joins the EEC". BBC News. 1 January 1973. Retrieved 9 March 2016.
- Alex May, Britain and Europe since 1945 (1999).
- "BBC on this day – 26 – 1975: Labour votes to leave the EEC". BBC.
- the Shetland Islands and the Outer Hebrides
- Miller, Vaughne (13 July 2015). "Research Briefings – The 1974–1975 UK Renegotiation of EEC Membership and Referendum". Parliament of the United Kingdom. Retrieved 19 May 2016.
- "Who Voted for Brexit? A comprehensive district level analysis". Becker, Fetzer, Novy, University of Warwick. Retrieved 22 November 2016.
- Vaidyanathan, Rajini (4 March 2010). "Michael Foot: What did the "longest suicide note" say?". BBC News Magazine. BBC. Retrieved 21 October 2015.
- Dury, Hélène. "Black Wednesday" (PDF). Retrieved 24 February 2016.
- "EU treaties". Europa (web portal). Archived from the original on 13 September 2016. Retrieved 15 September 2016.
- "EUROPA The EU in brief". Europa (web portal). Retrieved 19 May 2016.
- Bogdanor also quotes John Locke’s The Second Treatise of Government: ‘The Legislative cannot transfer the power of making laws to any other hands. For it being but a delegated power from the People, they who have it cannot pass it to others.' – Bogdanor, Vernon (8 June 1993). Why the people should have a vote on Maastricht: The House of Lords must uphold democracy and insist on a referendum. The Independent.
- Bogdanor, Vernon (26 July 1993). Futility of a House with no windows. The Independent.
- Heath, Anthony; Jowell, Roger; Taylor, Bridget; Thomson, Katarina (1 January 1998). "Euroscepticism and the referendum party". British Elections & Parties Review. 8 (1): 95–110. doi:10.1080/13689889808413007. ISSN 1368-9886.
- Carter, N.; Evans, M.; Alderman, K.; Gorham, S. (1 July 1998). "Europe, Goldsmith and the Referendum Party". Parliamentary Affairs. 51 (3): 470–485. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pa.a028811. ISSN 0031-2290.
- "UK Election 1997". Politicsresources.net. Archived from the original on 21 September 2011. Retrieved 16 July 2015.
- "10 key lessons from the European election results". The Guardian. 26 May 2014. Retrieved 31 May 2014.
- "Does Migration Cause Extreme Voting?" (PDF). Becker and Fetzer, University of Warwick. 18 October 2016. Retrieved 30 November 2016.
- Matt Osborn (7 May 2015). "2015 UK general election results in full". The Guardian.
- Mortimore, Roger. "Polling history: 40 years of British views on "in or out" of Europe". The Conversation. Retrieved 25 October 2016.
- Gifford, Chris. The Making of Eurosceptic Britain. Ashgate Publishing, 2014. pp. 55, 68
- Foster, Anthony. Euroscepticism in Contemporary British Politics: Opposition to Europe in the Conservative and Labour Parties since 1945. Routledge, 2003. pp. 68–69
- Taylor, Graham. Understanding Brexit: Why Britain Voted to Leave the European Union. Emerald Group Publishing, 2017. p. 91. Quote: "The coalition that came together to secure Brexit, however, included a diverse range of individuals, groups and interests. […] There were also supporters of Brexit on the left..."
- Tarran, Brian (8 April 2016). "The Economy: a Brexit vote winner?". Significance. 13 (2): 6–7. doi:10.1111/j.1740-9713.2016.00891.x.
- Nicholas Watt (29 June 2012). "Cameron defies Tory right over EU referendum: Prime minister, buoyed by successful negotiations on eurozone banking reform, rejects "in or out" referendum on EU". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 2 July 2012.
David Cameron placed himself on a collision course with the Tory right when he mounted a passionate defence of Britain's membership of the EU and rejected out of hand an "in or out" referendum.
- Sparrow, Andrew (1 July 2012). "PM accused of weak stance on Europe referendum". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 2 July 2012.
Cameron said he would continue to work for "a different, more flexible and less onerous position for Britain within the EU".
- "David Cameron 'prepared to consider EU referendum'". BBC News. 1 July 2012. Retrieved 2 July 2012.
Mr Cameron said ... he would 'continue to work for a different, more flexible and less onerous position for Britain within the EU'.
- "David Cameron promises in/out referendum on EU". BBC News. 23 January 2013. Retrieved 23 April 2016.
- "At-a-glance: Conservative manifesto". BBC News. 15 April 2015.
- Perraudin, Frances (14 April 2015). "Conservatives election manifesto 2015 – the key points". the Guardian.
- "David Cameron sets out EU reform goals". BBC News. 11 November 2015. Retrieved 16 January 2016.
- New Open Europe/ComRes poll: Failure to win key reforms could swing UK's EU referendum vote openeurope.org, 16 December 2015.
- Spaventa, Eleanore. "Explaining the EU deal: the "emergency brake"". Retrieved 25 October 2016.
- "Prime Minister sets out legal framework for EU withdrawal". UK Parliament. 22 February 2016. Retrieved 29 February 2016.
- "The process for withdrawing from the European Union" (PDF). Government of the United Kingdom. Retrieved 24 June 2016.
- Jon Stone (13 April 2016). "Vote Leave designated as official EU referendum Out campaign".
- "Leave.eu". Leave.eu. Retrieved 19 May 2016.
- Other major campaign groups included Grassroots Out, Get Britain Out and Better Off Out.
- "Vote Leave campaign broke electoral law". BBC News. 17 July 2018.
- "Conservatives In". Archived from the original on 28 May 2016. Retrieved 2 June 2016.
- Alan Johnson MP. "Labour in for Britain – The Labour Party". Labour.org.uk. Archived from the original on 3 June 2016. Retrieved 19 May 2016.
- "Britain in Europe". Liberal Democrats. Retrieved 19 May 2016.
- "Greens for a Better Europe". Green Party. Retrieved 19 May 2016.
- "Home". Scientists for EU. Retrieved 2 June 2016.
- "Environmentalists For Europe homepage". Environmentalists For Europe. Retrieved 19 May 2016.
- "Universities for Europe". Universities for Europe. Retrieved 19 May 2016.
- "Another Europe is Possible". Retrieved 8 June 2016.
- "EU referendum: BBC forecasts UK votes to leave". BBC News. 24 June 2016. Retrieved 24 June 2016.
- "EU Referendum Results". Sky (United Kingdom). Retrieved 24 June 2016.
- Hooton, Christopher (24 June 2016). "Brexit: Petition for second EU referendum so popular the government site's crashing". The Independent. Independent Print Limited. Retrieved 24 June 2016.
- Boult, Adam (26 June 2016). "Petition for second EU referendum attracts thousands of signatures". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 26 June 2016.
- "Brexit: Petition for second EU referendum rejected". BBC News. 9 July 2016. Retrieved 9 July 2016.
- Sascha O Becker, Thiemo Fetzer, Dennis Novy. "Who voted for Brexit? A comprehensive district-level analysis". Economic Policy, Volume 32, Issue 92, 1 October 2017, pp. 601–650. Quotes: "We find that fundamental characteristics of the voting population were key drivers of the Vote Leave share, in particular their education profiles, their historical dependence on manufacturing employment as well as low income and high unemployment. At the much finer level of wards within cities, we find that areas with deprivation in terms of education, income and employment were more likely to vote Leave. [...] A larger flow of migrants from Eastern Europe reaching a local authority area with a larger share of unqualified people or a larger share of manufacturing workers is also associated with a larger Vote Leave share".
- Noel Dempsey & Neil Johnston. "Political disengagement in the UK: who is disengaged?". House of Commons briefing paper. House of Commons Library, 14 September 2018. p. 23
- "How the United Kingdom voted on Thursday… and why". Lord Ashcroft Polls. 24 June 2016.
- "Brexit: David Cameron to quit after UK votes to leave EU". BBC. 24 June 2016. Retrieved 24 June 2016.
- "UKIP leader Nigel Farage stands down". BBC News. 4 July 2016. Retrieved 5 July 2016.
- The Electoral Commission. (2018). Report on an investigation in respect of the Leave.EU Group Limited Concerning pre-poll transaction reports and the campaign spending return for the 2016 referendum on the UK’s membership of the European Union. Retrieved 14 April 2019.
- "Leave.EU fined £70,000 over Brexit spending". BBC News. 11 May 2018. Retrieved 11 May 2018.
- Samson, Adam (11 May 2018). "Leave.EU campaign fined by UK Electoral Commission". Financial Times. Retrieved 11 May 2018.
- The Electoral Commission. (2018). Report of an investigation in respect of Vote Leave Limited, Mr Darren Grimes, BeLeave, Veterans for Britain Concerning campaign funding and spending for the 2016 referendum on the UK’s membership of the EU. Retrieved 14 April 2019.
- House of Commons Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee. (2018). Disinformation and ‘fake news’: Interim Report. Published 29 July 2018; retrieved 14 April 2019.
- House of Commons Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee. (2019). Disinformation and ‘fake news’: Final Report. Published 18 February 2019; retrieved 14 April 2019.
- "Robert Craig: New Article 50 Case Resoundingly Rejected by the Divisional Court". UK Constitutional Law Association. 26 June 2018. Retrieved 20 November 2018.
- "Article 50 Challenge". CrowdJustice. Retrieved 20 November 2018.
- 'Grounds for Judicial Review' in Wilson v Prime Minister, 13 August 2018.
- "UKEU Challenge Update" (PDF). UKEU Challenge. Retrieved 20 November 2018.
- Maugham, Jolyon (21 September 2018). "Today's ruling shows the triggering of article 50 can be reversed". The Guardian. Retrieved 20 November 2018.
- UK Supreme Court. "Reasons for the determination in the matter of Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union (Appellant) v Wightman and others (Respondents)" (PDF). UK Supreme Court. Retrieved 20 November 2018.
- "The United Kingdom is free to revoke unilaterally the notification of its intention to withdraw from the EU" (PDF). Court of Justice of the European Union. 10 December 2018. Retrieved 18 January 2019.
- Khetani-Shah, S. & Deutsch, J. (2017). Brexit timeline: From referendum to EU exit (Politico Pro).
- Sparrow, A. (2016). MPs vote to demand Brexit plan and say article 50 should be triggered by the end March – as it happened (Guardian). Retrieved 29 March 2019.
- "Government loses 'meaningful vote' in the Commons". UK Parliament. 16 January 2019. Retrieved 8 April 2019.
- "Government's Brexit deal defeated again in 'meaningful vote'". UK Parliament. 12 March 2019. Retrieved 8 April 2019.
- Stewart, Heather; Boffey, Daniel (5 April 2019). "May asks for Brexit extension to 30 June as Tusk offers up to a year". The Guardian.
- "New Brexit deadline set for 31 October". 11 April 2019. Retrieved 11 April 2019.
- European Council (10 April 2019). "Special meeting of the European Council (Art. 50) (10 April 2019) – Conclusions" (PDF). Retrieved 11 April 2019.
- Article 50(3) of the Treaty on European Union.
- Patrick Wintour (22 July 2016). "UK officials seek draft agreements with EU before triggering article 50". The Guardian. Retrieved 12 October 2016.
- Renwick, Alan (19 January 2016). "What happens if we vote for Brexit?". The Constitution Unit Blog. Retrieved 14 May 2016.
- Wright, Ben (26 February 2016). "Reality Check: How plausible is second EU referendum?". BBC News. BBC. Retrieved 14 May 2016.
- In a leaflet sent out before the referendum, the UK government stated "This is your decision. The Government will implement what you decide." "Why the Government believes that voting to remain in the European Union is the best decision for the UK. The EU referendum, Thursday, 23 June 2016" (PDF).
- "Brexit: David Cameron to quit after UK votes to leave EU". BBC News. BBC. 24 June 2016. Retrieved 24 June 2016.
- Cooper, Charlie (27 June 2016). "David Cameron rules out second EU referendum after Brexit". The Independent. London. Retrieved 27 June 2016.
- Ram, Vidya. "U.K. govt. must get Parliament nod for Brexit: Supreme Court". The Hindu. Retrieved 8 March 2017.
- Bowcott, Owen; Mason, Rowena; Asthana, Anushka (24 January 2017). "Supreme court rules parliament must have vote to trigger article 50". The Guardian. Retrieved 9 February 2017.
- "Brexit: MPs overwhelmingly back Article 50 bill". BBC. 1 February 2017. Retrieved 1 February 2017.
- "Article 50: May signs letter that will trigger Brexit". BBC News. 28 March 2017. Retrieved 28 March 2017.
- Tusk, Donald [@eucopresident] (29 March 2017). "The Article 50 letter. #Brexit" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
- Stamp, Gavin; Hunt, Alex (28 March 2017). "Theresa May officially starts Brexit process". BBC News. Retrieved 29 March 2017.
- Szyszczak, Erika; Lydgate, Emily (10 October 2016). Triggering Article 50 TEU: A Legal Analysis (PDF) (Report). UK Trade Policy Observatory, University of Sussex. ISBN 978-1-912044-70-2. Retrieved 18 November 2017.
[...] the weight of academic opinion is that Article 50 TEU does allow for a Member State to revoke the application to withdraw and simply revert to the status quo.
- "Brexit is reversible, says author of Brexit treaty". The Independent. 21 February 2017.
- "a revocation of notification [by Article 50] needs to be subject to conditions set by all EU27, so that it cannot be used as a procedural device or abused in an attempt to improve on the current terms of the United Kingdom's membership""European Plenary sitting 10 April 2017". European Parliament. 10 April 2017. Retrieved 26 June 2017.
- Bowcott, Owen (16 November 2018). "Government takes Brexit article 50 case to UK supreme court". the Guardian. Retrieved 20 November 2018.
- Court, The Supreme. "Permission to appeal determination in the matter of Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union (Appellant) v Wightman and others (Respondents)". Supremecourt.uk. Retrieved 20 November 2018.
- Brexit ruling: UK can cancel decision, EU court says BBC Scotland, 10 December 2018
- "Key dates in Brexit process". Reuters. 2 February 2018. Retrieved 13 February 2019.
- "Statutory Instruments – 2019 No. 859 – Exiting The European Union – The European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (Exit Day) (Amendment) (No. 2) Regulations 2019" (PDF). The Stationery Office Limited. 11 April 2019. Retrieved 13 April 2019.
- "European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018". legislation.gov.uk. 2018. sec. 20(1). Retrieved 13 February 2019.
“exit day” means 29 March 2019 at 11.00 p.m.(and see subsections (2) to (5));Subsections (2) to (5) provide the option of amending the date by a Ministerial Regulation "if the day or time on or at which the Treaties are to cease to apply to the United Kingdom in accordance with Article 50(3) of the Treaty on European Union is different from that specified in the definition of “exit day” in subsection (1)." Article 50(3) of the Treaty on European Union states: The Treaties shall cease to apply to the State in question from the date of entry into force of the withdrawal agreement or, failing that, two years after the notification referred to in paragraph 2, unless the European Council, in agreement with the Member State concerned, unanimously decides to extend this period.
- The UK legislation states the day and hour as "29 March 2019 at 11.00 p.m." in the knowledge that the UK Interpretation Act 1978 s.4 (a) prescribes that "An Act or provision of an Act comes into force where provision is made for it to come into force on a particular day, at the beginning of that day".
- Walker, Nigel (6 February 2019). "House of Commons Briefing Paper 7960, summary". House of Commons. Retrieved 16 February 2019.
- "Directives for the negotiation of an agreement with the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland setting out the arrangements for its withdrawal from the European Union (Section II.8)". Europa (web portal). Retrieved 1 November 2017.
- "No notification, no negotiation: EU officials banned from Brexit talks with Britain". 30 June 2016. Retrieved 4 July 2016.
- "Juncker on populist right-wingers: "I want to stand against these forces"". 31 October 2016. Retrieved 31 October 2016.
- "Brexit-Bundestagsdebatte: Mit Merkel wird es kein Rosinenpicken für die Briten geben" [Brexit parliamentary debate: With Merkel there will be no cherrypicking for the British]. Die Welt. 28 June 2016. Retrieved 14 May 2017.
- "Theresa May – her full Brexit speech to Conservative conference". Independent. 2 October 2016. Retrieved 14 May 2017.
- Mason, Rowena (5 October 2016). "Theresa May's Conservative party conference speech – key points analysed". The Guardian. Retrieved 14 May 2017.
- Hope, Christopher (23 November 2016). "British expats set to be granted right to carry on living in EU with Theresa May 'close to reciprocal rights deal'". The Telegraph. Retrieved 18 January 2017.
- Swinford, Steven (29 November 2016). "Angela Merkel says "nein" to Theresa May's calls for early deal on rights of EU migrants and British ex-pats". The Telegraph. Retrieved 18 January 2017.
- "Brexit: Theresa May to trigger Article 50 by end of March". BBC News. 2 October 2016. Retrieved 16 October 2016.
- "The government's negotiating objectives for exiting the EU: PM speech". Gov.uk. 17 January 2017.
- Kuenssberg, Laura (17 January 2017). "Brexit: UK to leave single market, says Theresa May". BBC. Retrieved 14 May 2017.
- "Brexit: The UK's letter triggering Article 50". BBC News. 29 March 2017. Retrieved 15 May 2017.
- Asthana, Anushka (30 March 2017). "Don't blackmail us over security, EU warns May". The Guardian. Retrieved 15 May 2017.
- Nikos Chrysoloras (2 April 2017). "Your Guide to Key Dates in the Brexit Negotiations". Bloomberg. Retrieved 23 June 2017.
- Roberts, Dan (20 June 2017). "Brexit: UK caves in to EU demand to agree divorce bill before trade talks". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 9 September 2017.
- "Merkel lobt May-Angebot zum Brexit [Merkel praises May's offer on Brexit]". Die Zeit. Hamburg. 23 June 2017. Retrieved 23 June 2017.
- "European Council (Art. 50) guidelines for Brexit negotiations". Council of the European Union Website. Council of the European Union. 29 April 2017. Retrieved 14 April 2017.
- Foster, Peter (29 April 2017). "EU Brexit guidelines: What's in the document, and what it really means". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 14 May 2017.
- "Divorce settlement or leaving the club? A breakdown of the Brexit bill" March 2017, A breakdown of the Brexit bill (2017)
- Worstall, Tim (3 May 2017). "It Is To Laugh at Their Mistake – EU's Brexit Bill Claim Now At €100 Billion". Forbes. Retrieved 15 May 2017.
- "Brexit: UK 'not obliged' to pay divorce bill say peers". BBC News. 4 March 2017.
- "Council (Art 50) authorises the start of Brexit talks and adopts negotiating directives – Consilium". Europa (web portal).
- "Brexit: UK caves in to EU demand to agree divorce bill before trade talks", The Guardian, 19 June 2017. Retrieved 20 June 2017
- Boffey, Daniel (22 June 2017). "Donald Tusk echoes John Lennon to suggest UK could stay in EU". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 23 June 2017.
- Abert, Eric (27 June 2017). "Brexit: les expatriés, premier bras de fer entre Londres et Bruxelles [Brexit: Expatriates, the first armwrestling match between London and Brussels]". Le Monde. Paris. Retrieved 27 June 2017.
- Bush, Stephen (2 May 2017). "Theresa May and Jean-Claude Juncker's dinner leaked because no-one thinks Brexit will work". New Statesman. Retrieved 15 May 2017.
- "Brexit-Verhandlungen: London will EU-Bürger in Grossbritannien halten" [Brexit negotiations: London wants to keep EU citizens in Britain]. Neue Zürcher Zeitung. 26 June 2017. Retrieved 27 June 2017.
- "Reality Check: Britain and EU at odds over citizens' rights". BBC News. 27 June 2017. Retrieved 27 June 2017.
- "EU and UK 'singing from same hymn sheet' on Northern Ireland". The Irish Times. 20 July 2017. Retrieved 20 July 2017.
- Nuspliger, Niklus (20 July 2017). "Zweite Verhandlungsrunde in Brüssel: London bleibt zu Brexit-Rechnung unverbindlich" [Second round of negotiations in Brussels: London remains non-committal to Brexit bill]. Neue Zürcher Zeitung. Retrieved 21 July 2017.
- "Brexit: UK and EU at odds over "exit bill"". BBC News. 21 July 2017. Retrieved 21 July 2017.
- "UK forwarders: Brexit customs proposal short on details". joc.com.
- "PM: UK leaving EU court's jurisdiction". BBC. 23 August 2017. Retrieved 1 November 2017.
- "Brexit: Jean-Claude Juncker criticises UK's position papers". BBC News. 30 August 2017. Retrieved 30 August 2017.
- "Huge gulf in negotiations on UK's Brexit bill". The Irish Times. 31 August 2017. Retrieved 2 September 2017.
- "Major breakthrough in Irish strand of Brexit talks". The Irish Times. 1 September 2017. Retrieved 2 September 2017.
- "Brexit: "Significant differences" over exit bill says Davis". BBC News. 5 September 2017. Retrieved 5 September 2017.
- "Don't use Irish border as test case for EU–UK border, says Barnier". The Irish Times. 7 September 2017. Retrieved 7 September 2017.
- Guardian Wires (22 September 2017). "Theresa May's Brexit speech in Florence". YouTube. Retrieved 1 November 2017.
- "Keep EU trade as it is until 2021 – May". BBC. 22 September 2017. Retrieved 1 November 2017.
- CNN, Laura Smith-Spark. "UK PM seeks to break Brexit deadlock". CNN. Retrieved 1 November 2017.
- "The Latest: EU's Brexit Chief Welcomes 'Constructive' Speech". USNews.com. Retrieved 1 November 2017.
- "Brexit: UK needs to clarify issues – Macron". BBC News. 23 September 2017. Retrieved 23 September 2017.
- "Hopes and frustrations as Brexit talks resume after May speech". Reuters. 24 September 2017. Retrieved 28 September 2017.
- Foster, Peter (7 September 2017). "Brexit trade talks deadline to slip to December, says European Parliament chief". The Telegraph. Retrieved 7 September 2017.
- "Council Conclusions" (PDF). 20 October 2017. Retrieved 8 December 2017.
- "UK explores 'no deal' Brexit". BBC. 9 October 2017. Retrieved 1 November 2017.
- "Brexit: EU leaders agree to move talks to next stage". BBC News. 15 December 2017. Retrieved 19 December 2017.
- "Border deal is not likely until October, Taoiseach claims". The Irish Times. 11 June 2018. Retrieved 11 June 2018.
- "Commons set for Brexit vote showdown". BBC News. 20 June 2018. Retrieved 20 June 2018.
- "Joint statement from the negotiators of the European Union and the United Kingdom Government on progress of negotiations under Article 50 TEU" (PDF). Consilium.eu. 20 June 2018. Retrieved 20 June 2018.
- "Brexit: Cabinet backs draft agreement". BBC News. 14 November 2018. Retrieved 15 November 2018.
- "Draft Agreement on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland from the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, as agreed at negotiators' level on 14 November 2018". European Commission. 14 November 2018. Retrieved 15 November 2018.
- "Brexit: Dominic Raab and Esther McVey among ministers to quit over EU agreement". BBC News. 15 November 2018. Retrieved 15 November 2018.
- .European Commission - Press release, Brussels, 19 December 2018.
- "Theresa May signals Whitehall rejig with two new Cabinet posts". civilserviceworld.com. CSW. Retrieved 14 July 2016.
- Trading places / Negotiating post-Brexit deals. Economist, 4–10 February 2017, p. 25
- "Temporary tariff regime for no deal Brexit published". GOV.UK.
- correspondent, Lisa O'Carroll Brexit; Boffey, Daniel (13 March 2019). "UK will cut most tariffs to zero in event of no-deal Brexit". Theguardian.com.
- Glaze, Ben; Bloom, Dan; Owen, Cathy (13 March 2019). "Car prices to rise by £1,500 as no-deal tariffs are revealed". walesonline.
- "No-deal tariff regime would be 'sledgehammer' to UK economy, CBI warns". Aol.co.uk.
- "This is why farmers are suddenly very worried about a no-deal Brexit". The Independent. 13 March 2019.
- "No-deal plans a bid 'to break EU unity'". Bbc.co.uk. 13 March 2019.
- Sandford, Alisdair (13 March 2019). "UK zero-tariff plan for no-deal Brexit would not spare some EU imports" (PDF). Euronews.com.
- McCormack, Jayne (14 March 2019). "Does NI tariffs plan violate WTO law?". Bbc.co.uk.
- "EU to apply normal tariffs on trade with UK in case of no-deal Brexit". Uk.reuters.com. 13 March 2019.
- "EU says UK no-deal Brexit tariff plan is 'illegal'". The Independent. 15 March 2019. Retrieved 15 March 2019.
- "Brexit: Legal advice warns of Irish border 'stalemate'". BBC News. 5 December 2018. Retrieved 24 December 2018.
- "Theresa May calls off vote on Brexit deal after massive opposition from Tory rebels". The Independent. 10 December 2018. Retrieved 11 December 2018.
- Boffey, Daniels (10 December 2018). "EU figures rule out concessions as May postpones Brexit vote". The Guardian. Retrieved 29 December 2018.
- "Welsh Labour MPs call for no confidence vote". ITV News. Retrieved 11 December 2018.
- Jessica Elgot & Heather Stewart, Theresa May splits Tories over anti-backstop Brexit deal, The Guardian (28 January 2019).
- Laura Hughes, Eurosceptics still defiant over May’s Brexit deal, Financial Times (13 December 2018).
- William Booth, May's plan for phasing Britain out of the E.U., Washington Post (25 November 2018).
- Jack Maidment, Eurosceptic Tories publish analysis of Theresa May's Brexit deal and claim UK could pay EU £39bn 'for nothing', The Daily Telegraph (18 November 2018).
- Sir Ivan Rogers on Brexit, University of Liverpool 
- "Brexit: Theresa May's deal is voted down in historic Commons defeat". BBC News. BBC. 15 January 2019. Retrieved 16 January 2019.
- Voce, Antonio; Clarke, Seán; Voce, Antonio; Clarke, Seán. "How did your MP vote on May's Brexit deal?". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 15 January 2019.
- "PM's Brexit deal rejected by huge margin". BBC News. 15 January 2019.
- Stewart, Heather (15 January 2019). "Theresa May loses Brexit deal vote by majority of 230". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 15 January 2019.
- Rayner, Gordon; Maidment, Jack; Crisp, James; Yorke, Harry (16 January 2019). "No confidence vote result: Theresa May wins confidence vote but is snubbed by Jeremy Corbyn over cross-party Brexit talks". The Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 17 January 2019.
- Reuters, Thomas. "May promises Brexit vote in U.K. parliament by March 12".
- "Brexit: MPs reject Theresa May's deal for a second time". BBC News. BBC. 13 March 2019. Retrieved 19 March 2019.
- "Brexit: 'Tired' public needs a decision, says Theresa May". BBC News. 20 March 2019.
- "Brexit: Theresa May to urge MPs to back deal as delay agreed". BBC News. 22 March 2019. Retrieved 22 March 2019.
- Ciaran McGrath (26 March 2019). "Get us out NOW! May's Brexit delay 'UNLAWFUL' – MPs issue shock legal block". Daily Express. Retrieved 28 March 2019.
...Brexiteer MPs led by Sir Bill Cash have written to Mrs May warning of their "serious legal objections" to her decision to delay Article 50, and hence Brexit, beyond March 29. ... The Government is confident a proposed law change altering the Brexit date is "legally correct" in response to concerns raised by lawyers. Ministers were pressed over the legality of the statutory instrument (SI) to change the exit day of the UK's withdrawal from the EU by Lord Pannick, who successfully led the Supreme Court Article 50 case against the Government. ... The concern centres on the SI, due to be debated by peers and MPs on Wednesday, containing two alternative exit days.
- "Amendment to the Motion – Business of the House – Motion to Agree – in the House of Lords at 3:06 pm on 26th March 2019". TheyWorkForYou. 26 March 2019. Retrieved 28 March 2019.
...Lord Pannick: ... A number of lawyers have expressed concern about the legality of this statutory instrument. The concern is that it sets out two alternative exit days: 12 April or 22 May.
- Andrew Sparrow; Jedidajah Otte (27 March 2019). "All eight indicative vote options on Brexit defeated by MPs – as it happened". Guardian. Retrieved 28 March 2019.
The statutory instrument needs to be passed by both the Commons and the Lords. In the Lords peers passed it earlier today, without a division
- Daniel Thomas (27 March 2019). "MPs vote down rival Brexit plans as May offers to resign – as it happened". Financial Times. Retrieved 28 March 2019.
MPs delay Brexit date by 441 to 105
- "Third Brexit vote must be different – Speaker". BBC News. 18 March 2019. Retrieved 18 March 2019.
- "Brexit: MPs face new vote on withdrawal deal". BBC News. 29 March 2019. Retrieved 29 March 2019.
- "Brexit: Brexit: MPs reject May's EU withdrawal agreement". BBC News. 29 March 2019. Retrieved 29 March 2019.
- "European Union (Withdrawal) Bill 2017–19 – UK Parliament". Parliament of the United Kingdom. Retrieved 23 July 2017.
- "EU repeal bill wins first Commons vote". BBC News. 12 September 2017. Retrieved 1 November 2017.
- "Conclusions adopted by the European Council (Art. 50), 29 June 2018" (PDF). europa.eu.
- What is “exit day”? House of Commons Library, 19 March 2019.
- Hannah White and Jill Rutter, "Legislating Brexit: The Great Repeal Bill and the wider legislative challenge", Institute for Government, 20 March 2017, p. 9 
- "Brexit could place 'huge burden' on Parliament". BBC. 20 March 2017.
- Hinson, Suzanna (23 January 2018). "Analysis of the Nuclear Safeguards Bill 2017–19". Retrieved 6 February 2018.
- Anushka Asthana (20 December 2016). "Theresa May indicates MPs will not be given vote on final Brexit deal". The Guardian. Retrieved 24 February 2017.
- Asthana, Anushka; Walker, Peter (19 April 2017). "Theresa May calls for general election to secure Brexit mandate". The Guardian. Retrieved 19 April 2017.
- "General election 2017: UKIP needed to stop Brexit 'backsliding'". BBC News. 28 April 2017. Retrieved 29 April 2017.
- Anushka Asthana (24 April 2017). "Labour vows to rip up and rethink Brexit white paper". The Guardian. Retrieved 25 April 2017.
- "General Election 2017: Labour's 'day one' pledge to EU nationals". BBC News. 25 April 2017. Retrieved 25 April 2017.
- "'This is your chance,' Lib Dems tell voters opposed to Hard Brexit". The Herald. 18 April 2017. Retrieved 23 April 2017.
- "Green Party leader Caroline Lucas calls for second EU referendum". The Independent. 2 September 2016. Retrieved 19 April 2017.
- "Lib Dem leader Tim Farron responds to Theresa May's general election announcement". The Independent. 18 April 2017. Retrieved 19 April 2017.
- "Stronger for Scotland" (PDF). SNP website. 1 June 2017. Retrieved 13 June 2018.
- "SNP manifesto summary: Key points at-a-glance". BBC News. 30 May 2017. Retrieved 13 June 2018.
- "Election 2017 Results". BBC News. 9 June 2017. Retrieved 13 June 2018.
- "Conservatives agree pact with DUP to support May government". BBC News. 26 June 2017. Retrieved 26 June 2017.
- Curtice, John (8 February 2019). "Has There Been a Shift in Support for Brexit?". What UK Thinks. Retrieved 16 May 2019.
Until the 2017 general election typically more people said that the decision to leave the EU was right than stated it was wrong. Since then, however, the oppose has been the case... The reason why the balance of opinion had shifted in favour of Remain, even though very few Leave voters had changed their minds, was because those who had not voted before (in some cases because they had been too young to do so) were now decisively in favour of Remain.
- "What is a ‘no deal’ Brexit?"
- Mayhew, Ken (1 March 2017). "UK higher education and Brexit". Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 33 (suppl_1): S155–S161. doi:10.1093/oxrep/grx012. ISSN 0266-903X.
- Between 2007 and 2013 the UK received €8.8 billion from the EU for research while contributing €5.4 billion to the EU's research budget.UK research and the European Union: the role of the EU in funding UK research (PDF). London: Royal Society. 2016. pp. 12, Figure 4.
- MacKenzie, Debora. "Here's why British scientists are so opposed to Brexit". MIT Technology Review. Retrieved 16 January 2019.
- Around 11% of the research income of British universities came from the EU in 2014–2015 University Funding Explained (PDF). London: UK Universities. July 2016.
- Elgot, Jessica; Elliott, Larry; Davis, Nicola (13 August 2016). "Treasury to guarantee post-Brexit funding for EU-backed projects". The Guardian.
- Sample, Ian (12 July 2016). "UK scientists dropped from EU projects because of post-Brexit funding fears". The Guardian. Retrieved 18 July 2016.
- "It is likely that the UK would wish to remain an associated member of the European Research Area, like Norway and Iceland, in order to continue participating in the EU framework programmes."UNESCO Science Report: towards 2030 (PDF). Paris: UNESCO Publishing. 2015. p. 269. ISBN 978-92-3-100129-1.
- Lyons, Niamh (31 January 2017). "Brexit will not mean hard border, leaders vow". The Times, Ireland edition. Retrieved 29 April 2017.
- Brexit: the unexpected threat to peace in Northern Ireland Nic Robertson, CNN, 6 April 2018
- George Mitchell: UK and Ireland need to realise what's at stake in Brexit talks. Belfast Telegraph, 8 April 2018
- Brexit threatens Good Friday agreement, Irish PM warns. David Smith, The Guardian, 14 March 2018
- "Q&A: The Irish border Brexit backstop". BBC News. 13 December 2018.
- "FactCheck: What are the options for the Irish border after Brexit?". Channel4.com. Retrieved 25 October 2018.
- "Britain does not want return to Northern Ireland border controls, says May". The Irish Times. 26 July 2016. Retrieved 12 October 2016.
- "'Violence in NI' if hard border returns". BBC News. 18 February 2019.
- Cooper, Charlie (13 March 2019). "UK to unilaterally waive all checks at Irish border in no-deal Brexit". Politico.
- "Brexit Q&A: From smuggling to taxes - what does it all mean?". Independent.ie.
- President of Ireland's website, news release 17 March 2019
- Patrick Wintour (3 March 2016). "French minister: Brexit would threaten Calais border arrangement". The Guardian.
- "Q&A: Would Brexit really move "the Jungle" to Dover?". Retrieved 27 April 2016.
- "Xavier Bertrand a les accords du Touquet dans le viseur". Libération.
- Treaty between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Government of the French Republic concerning the Implementation of Frontier Controls at the Sea Ports of both Countries on the Channel and North Sea (PDF), The Stationery Office, 4 February 2003, cm6172, archived from the original (PDF) on 12 January 2008, retrieved 5 July 2016,
This Treaty is concluded for an unlimited duration and each of the Contracting Parties may terminate it at any time by written notification ... The termination shall come into effect two years after the date of this notification.
- Buchanan, Elsa (30 June 2016). "François Hollande rejects suspension of Le Touquet treaty at Calais despite UK Brexit". International Business Times. Retrieved 4 July 2016.
- "Brexit: Everyone Loses, but Britain Loses the Most". PIIE. 1 March 2019. Retrieved 17 March 2019.
- Breinlich, Holger; Leromain, Elsa; Novy, Dennis; Sampson, Thomas (20 November 2017). "The consequences of the Brexit vote for UK inflation and living standards: First evidence". VoxEU.org. Retrieved 21 November 2017.
- Born, Benjamin; Müller, Gernot; Schularick, Moritz; Sedláček, Petr (30 September 2018). "£350 million a week: The output cost of the Brexit vote". VoxEU.org. Retrieved 1 October 2018.
- Born, Benjamin; Müller, Gernot; Schularick, Moritz; Sedláček, Petr (28 November 2017). "£300 million a week: The output cost of the Brexit vote". VoxEU.org. Retrieved 28 November 2017.
- "Centre for Economic Policy Research". cepr.org. Retrieved 28 November 2017.
- Savage, Michael; McKie, Robin (29 September 2018). "Britain's bill for Brexit hits £500m a week – and rising". the Guardian. Retrieved 29 September 2018.
- Giles, Chris (18 December 2017). "The real price of Brexit begins to emerge". Financial Times. Retrieved 19 December 2017.
- Bloom, Nicholas; Chen, Scarlet; Mizen, Paul (16 November 2018). "Rising Brexit uncertainty has reduced investment and employment". VoxEU.org. Retrieved 20 November 2018.
- Crowley, Meredith; Exton, Oliver; Han, Lu (21 January 2019). "The impact of Brexit uncertainty on UK exports". VoxEU.org. Retrieved 21 January 2019.
- "DP13446 Renegotiation of Trade Agreements and Firm Exporting Decisions: Evidence from the Impact of Brexit on UK Exports". cepr.org. Retrieved 21 January 2019.
- Graziano, Alejandro; Handley, Kyle; Limão, Nuno (2018). "Brexit Uncertainty and Trade Disintegration".
- Soegaard, Christian. "Brexit has already hurt EU and non-EU exports by up to 13% – new research". The Conversation. Retrieved 5 November 2018.
- Douch, Mustapha; Edwards, T. Huw; Soegaard, Christian (2018). "The Trade Effects of the Brexit Announcement Shock".
- Breinlich, Holger; Leromain, Elsa; Novy, Dennis; Sampson, Thomas (12 February 2019). "Voting with their money: Brexit and outward investment by UK firms". VoxEU.org. Retrieved 13 February 2019.
- "Brexit referendum spurs British companies into investing in EU". Reuters. 11 February 2019. Retrieved 13 February 2019.
- "The Government's Own Brexit Analysis Says The UK Will Be Worse Off in Every Scenario Outside The EU". BuzzFeed. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
- "Secret data show Britain worse off under all Brexit scenarios". Financial Times. Retrieved 30 January 2018.
- "HM Treasury analysis: the long-term economic impact of EU membership and the alternatives". Government of the United Kingdom. Retrieved 8 June 2016.
- "Brexit and the UK's Public Finances" (PDF) (IFS Report 116). Institute for Fiscal Studies. May 2016. Retrieved 18 June 2016.
- "The economic consequences". The Economist. Retrieved 1 November 2017.
- "If it ain't broke, don't Brexit". The Economist. Retrieved 1 November 2017.
- Corsetti, Giancarlo; Crowley, Meredith; Exton, Oliver; Han, Lu (13 December 2017). "A granular analysis of the exposure of UK exports to EU tariffs, quotas and antidumping under 'no deal'". VoxEU.org. Retrieved 13 December 2017.
- Chen, Wen; Los, Bart; McCann, Philip; Ortega-Argilés, Raquel; Thissen, Mark; van Oort, Frank (2017). "The continental divide? Economic exposure to Brexit in regions and countries on both sides of The Channel". Papers in Regional Science. 97: 25–54. doi:10.1111/pirs.12334. ISSN 1435-5957.
- Portes, Jonathan; Forte, Giuseppe (1 March 2017). "The economic impact of Brexit-induced reductions in migration". Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 33 (suppl_1): S31–S44. doi:10.1093/oxrep/grx008. ISSN 0266-903X.
- "EU-Austritt des UK: Diese Folgen hat der Brexit für Deutschland und die EU" [UK Exit from EU: Brexit has these consequences for Germany and the EU]. Merkur.de (in German). 22 August 2016. Retrieved 30 November 2016.
Die Briten haben sich für einen Abschied entschieden, Europa wird nun anders aussehen. Der Kontinent verliert seine (neben Frankreich) stärkste Militärmacht samt Atomwaffenarsenal, seine zweitgrößte Volkswirtschaft, das Land mit der drittgrößten Bevölkerung, die Finanzhauptstadt der Welt und einen von zwei Plätzen im UN-Sicherheitsrat. [The British have decided to leave. Europe will now look different. The continent will be losing its strongest military power (alongside France), ... its second largest economy, the country with the third largest population, the financial capital of the world, and one of two seats on the UN Security Council.]
- Hendrik Kafsack (8 August 2016). "EU-Haushalt: Deutschland überweist das meiste Geld an Brüssel". Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (in German). Retrieved 9 October 2016.
- Reuters/dpa (10 September 2016). "Brexit wird teuer für Deutschland". Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (in German). Retrieved 9 October 2016.
- McCann, Allison; Schreuer, Milan; Tsang, Amie (7 February 2019). "Where Europe Would Be Hurt Most by a No-Deal Brexit". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 20 May 2019.
- "Europe's small open countries brace for Brexit". The Economist. 11 April 2019. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 20 May 2019.
- "Central bank of the year: Bank of England – Central Banking". Central Banking. 16 February 2017. Retrieved 22 November 2017.
- Macro, Mainly (9 February 2017). "mainly macro: How Brexit advocates intend to smear economics". mainly macro. Retrieved 22 November 2017.
- Eichengreen, Barry (10 August 2017). "The experts strike back! How economists are being proved right on Brexit". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 28 November 2017.
- David Miles (11 January 2017). "Andy Haldane is wrong: there is no crisis in economics". Financial Times.
- Carter, Andrew; Swinney, Paul. "Brexit and the Future of the UK's Unbalanced Economic Geography". The Political Quarterly. 0 (0). doi:10.1111/1467-923X.12649. ISSN 1467-923X.
What all of these studies agree on is that whichever Brexit deal is struck, even the most advantageous will have a negative impact on future economic growth for all places across the UK in the short to medium term. And they also agree that over the longer term its places that are already struggling that are likely to struggle the most, further exacerbating the country's unbalanced economic geography.
- Eichengreen, Barry (7 January 2019). "The international financial implications of Brexit". International Economics and Economic Policy: 1–14. doi:10.1007/s10368-018-0422-x. ISSN 1612-4812.
- Armour, John (1 March 2017). "Brexit and financial services". Oxford Review of Economic Policy. 33 (suppl_1): S54–S69. doi:10.1093/oxrep/grx014. ISSN 0266-903X.
- Lockwood, Matthew; Froggatt, Antony; Wright, Georgina; Dutton, Joseph (1 November 2017). "The implications of Brexit for the electricity sector in Great Britain: Trade-offs between market integration and policy influence". Energy Policy. 110: 137–143. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2017.08.021. ISSN 0301-4215.
- "(PDF) With or without you? Policy impact and networks in the Council of the EU after Brexit". ResearchGate.
- Gruyter, Caroline de. "There Is Life for the EU After Brexit". Carnegie Europe.
- "A two-speed post-Brexit Europe is best avoided". Financial Times.
- Dorothea Siems (18 June 2016). "Sperrminorität". Die Welt (in German). Retrieved 9 October 2016.
- "European Parliament moves to sideline British MEPs". The Irish Times. Retrieved 15 November 2016.
- "MEPs debate who inherits British seats". politico.eu. Retrieved 12 April 2017.
- ""Is Brexit an opportunity to reform the European Parliament?" [pdf]" (PDF).
- "Main world producers (2007)" (PDF). Retrieved 23 July 2018.
- Daniel Boffey (15 February 2017). "UK fishermen may not win waters back after Brexit, EU memo reveals". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 3 July 2017.
Source: House of Lords, NAFC Marine Centre, University of the Highlands and Islands.
- Milne, Claire (21 June 2017). "Is the EU 'pinching our fish'?". fullfact.org. Retrieved 3 July 2017.
- Lorna Siggins (3 July 2017). "Fishing announcement UK's "first serious shot on Brexit"". The Irish Times. Retrieved 3 July 2017.
- Carrington, Damian (24 April 2018). "Hard Brexit would mean more and cheaper British fish – but there's a catch". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 17 January 2019.
- Phillipson, Jeremy; Symes, David (1 April 2018). "'A sea of troubles': Brexit and the fisheries question". Marine Policy. 90: 168–173. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2017.12.016. ISSN 0308-597X.
- Harry Cockburn (28 May 2016). "Brexit could threaten the sovereignty of Gibraltar, chief minister warns". The Independent. Retrieved 26 October 2018.
- "Brexit: Spain calls for joint control of Gibraltar". BBC News. Retrieved 26 June 2016.
- Joe Duggan (12 September 2016). "Chief Minister Fabian Picardo says 'British means British' at National Day political rally".
- "Govt's stark analysis highlights Brexit border challenge". Gibraltar Chronicle.
- "the UK would seek the best possible deal for Gibraltar as the UK exits the EU, and there would be no negotiation on the sovereignty of Gibraltar without the consent of its people." Theresa May, 6 April 2017, "UK won't negotiate away Gibraltar sovereignty, May tells Tusk". The Guardian. 6 April 2017.
- 'Sir Joe slams EU’s ‘disgraceful’ stance on Brexit and Gibraltar': The Gibraltar Chronicle, 2 February 2018
- "Spain hopes for Brexit deal on Gibraltar before October: foreign minister". Reuters. 4 April 2017.
- González, Miguel (17 October 2018). "Borrell urge a las empresas a prepararse para un Brexit sin acuerdo". El País.
- McKee, Martin; Galsworthy, Mike; Stuckler, David; Jarman, Holly; Greer, Scott; Hervey, Tamara; Fahy, Nick (25 February 2019). "How will Brexit affect health services in the UK? An updated evaluation". The Lancet. 0 (0). doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30425-8. ISSN 0140-6736.
- Burns, Kevin (11 September 2017). "Legal experts say common law Ireland to be "isolated" within EU after Brexit". Irish Legal News. Retrieved 12 September 2017.
- "Irish Government's legal bill "to go up after Brexit"". Irish Legal News. 11 September 2017. Retrieved 12 September 2017.
- Forte, Giuseppe; Portes, Jonathan (1 May 2017). "Macroeconomic Determinants of International Migration to the UK". Rochester, NY.
- Portes, Jonathan (1 November 2016). "Immigration after Brexit". National Institute Economic Review. 238 (1): R13–R21. doi:10.1177/002795011623800111. ISSN 0027-9501.
- Somerville, Will (June 2016). When the Dust Settles: Migration Policy after Brexit. Migration Policy Institute Commentary.
- Bennhold, Katrin (21 November 2017). "Where Brexit Hurts: The Nurses and Doctors Leaving London". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 22 November 2017.
- Wright, Robert (22 February 2018). "Annual net migration of EU citizens to UK falls below 100,000". Financial Times. Retrieved 13 June 2018.
- Siddique, Haroon (12 June 2017). "96% drop in EU nurses registering to work in Britain since Brexit vote". The Guardian. Retrieved 1 November 2017.
- Moss, Stephen (5 February 2019). "'The UK no longer feels like home': the British Europhiles racing for EU passports". The Guardian.
- Rosenbaum, Martin (30 June 2018). "Surge in Britons getting another EU nationality". BBC News.
- "Brexit: New move to keep EU citizenship". BBC News. 18 July 2018.
- "Brexit: What effect could leaving the European Union have on football transfers?". BBC Sport. 31 October 2018.
- "How Brexit will affect Premier League football | Goal.com". Goal.com.
- Collis, Helen (23 May 2017). "Brussels releases criteria to host EU agencies after Brexit". Politico. Retrieved 26 May 2017.
- "EU states set for squabble over who gets London's agencies after Brexit". Reuters. 2017. Retrieved 22 November 2017.
- Stafford, Philip (18 May 2017). "Europe nears decision on base for euro clearing". Financial Times. Retrieved 26 May 2017.
- "Flights to and from the UK if there's no Brexit deal". Her Majesty's Government. 24 September 2018. Retrieved 9 February 2019.
- Morris, Hugh (25 October 2018). "Air industry chief predicts 'chaos' for holiday flights in event of no-deal Brexit". The Telegraph. Retrieved 26 October 2018.
- Grayling, Chris (30 November 2018). "Transatlantic flight guarantee as UK and Canada agree new air arrangement". UK Government, Department for Transport. Retrieved 9 February 2019.
- "Switzerland and Britain reach post-Brexit aviation deal". Thelocal.ch. 17 December 2018.
- "Brexit no-deal may stop Eurostar trains entering France: French minister". Reuters. 13 September 2018. Retrieved 15 February 2019.
- Berti, Adele (20 December 2018). "Eurostar: a casualty of Brexit?". Railway Technology. Retrieved 15 February 2019.
- Peltier, Clément (15 February 2019). "Brexit : trois mois de sursis pour Eurotunnel et Eurostar" [Brexit: a three-month respite for Eurotunnel and Eurostar]. L'Echo touristique (in French). Retrieved 15 February 2019.
- HM Treasury, 17 December 2018. 
- Logistics Manager, 18 December 2018.
- "UK to remain in European Common Transit Convention after Brexit", Irish Examiner, 17 December 2018.
- Hauliers face lottery for permits in no-deal Brexit – The Guardian, 5 November 2018
- Turkey border gridlock hints at pain to come for Brexit Britain: Truck drivers bemoan long queues and endless paperwork needed to enter EU The Financial Times, 16 February 2017, by Mehul Srivastava and Alex Barker
- "Getting to Europe Post Brexit – The Impact on Ferry Companies". Atc-logistics.ie. 23 April 2018.
- Simons, Ned (24 January 2016). "Nicola Sturgeon Denies She Has "Machiavellian" Wish For Brexit". The Huffington Post UK. Retrieved 3 February 2016.
- "Scotland Says New Vote on Independence Is 'Highly Likely'". The New York Times. 25 June 2016.
- "Nicola Sturgeon says Scotland will pursue EU membership after independence". The Independent. 20 March 2017. Retrieved 20 March 2017.
- Stewart, Heather (16 March 2017). "Theresa May rejects Nicola Sturgeon's referendum demand". The Guardian. Retrieved 15 May 2017.
- "Sturgeon: independent Scotland may need "phased" return to EU". The Guardian. 14 May 2017.
- "Could Scotland block Brexit?". Retrieved 26 June 2016.
- Elliott; Mark. "Can Scotland block Brexit?". PublicLawForEveryone.com. Retrieved 13 July 2016.
- "Whitehall lawyers drawing up plans to challenge Continuity Bill in courts". Herald Scotland. 2018. Retrieved 3 April 2018.
- "Forging a new UK-wide agricultural framework post-Brexit". LSE. 2018. Retrieved 3 April 2018.
- "Why Brexit may be good for terrorists and the Kremlin and bad for European security". The Washington Post. 2018.
- McClean, Paul (30 May 2017). "After Brexit: the UK will need to renegotiate at least 759 treaties". Financial Times. Retrieved 31 May 2017.
Through analysis of the EU treaty database, the FT found 759 separate EU bilateral agreements with potential relevance to Britain, covering trade in nuclear goods, customs, fisheries, trade, transport and regulatory co-operation in areas such as antitrust or financial services. This includes multilateral agreements based on consensus, where Britain must re-approach 132 separate parties. Around 110 separate opt-in accords at the UN and World Trade Organization are excluded from the estimates, as are narrow agreements on the environment, health, research and science. Some additional UK bilateral deals, outside the EU framework, may also need to be revised because they make reference to EU law. Some of the 759 are so essential that it would be unthinkable to operate without them. Air services agreements allow British aeroplanes to land in America, Canada or Israel; nuclear accords permit the trade in spare parts and fuel for Britain's power stations. Both these sectors are excluded from trade negotiations and must be addressed separately.
- "Leaving the EU – Research Paper 13/42" (PDF). House of Commons Library. 1 July 2013. Retrieved 19 May 2015.
- Andrew Roberts (13 September 2016). "CANZUK: after Brexit, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Britain can unite as a pillar of Western civilisation". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 3 September 2018.
- James C. Bennett (24 June 2016). "Brexit boosts 'CANZUK' replacement for European Union: Column". Usatoday.com. Retrieved 3 September 2018.
- Scotti, Monique (21 January 2018). "Push for free movement of Canadians, Kiwis, Britons and Australians gains momentum". Globalnews.ca. Retrieved 3 September 2018.
- "Post-imperial nostalgia: Brexit and the Empire". Daily Times. 8 March 2017. Retrieved 3 September 2018.
- "Brexit, CANZUK, and the Legacy of Empire". The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 2019. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
- Krugman, Paul (10 July 2018). "Opinion | Brexit Meets Gravity". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
- 21 August; 2018|#LSEThinks; Brexit, Economics of; Comments, Featured|7 (21 August 2018). "Long read: Can Brexit defy gravity? It is still much cheaper to trade with neighbouring countries". LSE BREXIT. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
- Sampson, Thomas; Dhingra, Swati; Ottaviano, Gianmarco; Reenen, John Van (2 June 2016). "How 'Economists for Brexit' manage to defy the laws of gravity". VoxEU.org. Retrieved 14 January 2019.
- "Australia raises doubts over post-Brexit plans for EU food import quotas". The Guardian. 25 November 2017.
- Mia Jankowicz, "Britain's thriving art scene strangled by Brexit chaos" in Politics.co.uk, 20 March 2017: Online Link
- Ansorg, N. & Haastrup, T.: "Brexit Beyond the UK's Borders: What It Means for Africa", GIGA Focus Afrika No. 03/2016
- Clarke, Harold D.; Goodwin, Matthew; Whiteley, Paul (2017). Brexit: Why Britain Voted to Leave the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1316605042.
- Evans, Geoffrey; Menon, Anand (2017). Brexit and British Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press. ISBN 978-1509523863.
- Hobolt, Sara B. (7 September 2016). "The Brexit vote: a divided nation, a divided continent". Journal of European Public Policy. 23 (9): 1259–1277. doi:10.1080/13501763.2016.1225785. ISSN 1350-1763.
- Oliver, Tim (2018). Understanding Brexit: A concise introduction. Bristol: Policy Press. ISBN 978-1447346395.
- O'Rourke, Kevin (2019). A Short History of Brexit: From Brentry to Backstop. London: Pelican. ISBN 978-0241398272.
- O'Toole, Fintan (2018). Heroic Failure: Brexit and the Politics of Pain. London: Apollo. ISBN 978-1789540987.
- Outhwaite, William (ed.), Brexit: Sociological Responses (London: Anthem Press, 2017). ISBN 978-1783086443
- Peers, Steve (2016). The Brexit: The Legal Framework for Withdrawal from the EU or Renegotiation of EU Membership. Oxford: Hart Publishing. ISBN 978-1-84946-874-9. OCLC 917161408.
- Rogers, Ivan (2019). 9 Lessons in Brexit. London: Short Books. ISBN 978-1780723990.
- UK government's Brexit information
- UK government's official negotiation documents
- European Parliament – Brexit impact studies
- Legal Effect of the Protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland, Attorney General's advice to Prime Minister, 13 November 2018
- UK government's Explainer (for the withdrawal agreement) 14 November 2018
- House of Lords report analysing the proposed Withdrawal Agreement, 5 December 2018
- EU's official negotiation documents
- UK Parliament – Brexit News
- Reading list of post-EU Referendum publications by Parliament and the Devolved Assemblies – House of Commons Library
- Record of Brexit-related business in the devolved legislatures (Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales) – House of Commons Library
- Gov UK – Department for Exiting the European Union
- BBC: "Brexit: What are the options?" (10 October 2016)
- BBC: "Brexit vote: What could happen next?" (17 December 2018)
- The Brexit Papers, Bar Council, December 2016
- Plan for Britain: The government's negotiating objectives for exiting the EU: PM's speech delivered and published on 17 January 2017 – transcript of speech as delivered at Lancaster House, London
- The United Kingdom’s exit from and new partnership with the European Union, February 2017 ("White paper")
- Brexit at Curlie
- Quotes about Brexit on Euronews
- European Council Brexit Guidelines
- The economic effects of the government's proposed Brexit deal National Institute of Economic and Social Research, November 2018
- How will Brexit affect the UK’s manufacturing industry? UK Trade Policy Observatory, February 2018
- The real post-Brexit options Lecture by Ivan Rogers at the University of Glasgow, 23 May 2018
- What are the options for the UK’s trading relationship with the EU after Brexit? UK in a Changing Europe, King's College London, December 2018
- Brexit phrasebook: a guide to the talks' key terms The Guardian, 23 November 2018
- Lord Ashcroft: How the United Kingdom voted on EU referendum day – and why Conservative Home, 17 March 2019
- Explanatory Memorandum for the Withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union (Consequential Provisions) Bill 2019 introduced by the Irish government in the legislature (Oireachtas)
- EU Council decision, 22 March 2019, extending the negotiating period
Relating to court cases
- Judgment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union
- Judgment of the European Court of Justice in the Wightman case: Right of unilateral revocation of the notification
- Wilson v Prime Minister  EWHC 3520 (Admin)
- Ewan McGaughey Could Brexit be Void? King's Law Journal, Volume 29, 2018, Issue 3
- UK withdrawal from the European Union: Legal and procedural issues European Parliamentary Research Service, March 2017
- Ronan McCrea The legal issues of revoking the notification to leave the EU – but then notifying to leave again London School of Economics, 20 December 2018