User talk:Launchballer/archive/2013/1-100
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Talkback
Message added 20:02, 9 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Cobalion. Setting Justice everywhere.active 20:02, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
You removed my Derek edit
I'm afraid I'm new and don't know what I'm doing. I read your link to no avail. Any chance you could briefly run me through why what I did is different from the format of the Pilot summary? Chris Hindle (talk) 04:28, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Having thought about the matter further, I have changed my mind. There doesn't seem to be any reason to keep the page, so I have deleted it. Sorry about the delay. JamesBWatson (talk) 21:14, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: List of Districts of England by Population Density
Hello Launchballer. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of List of Districts of England by Population Density, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: R3 is for "recently created" redirects, and this is 7 years old. There's a reason for that restriction; on old redirect may be linked to externally, and we have no way to check that. Also "redirects are cheap", deleting it doesn't save any space, and none of the reasons at WP:R#DELETE applies. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 22:17, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Refs?
Did you seriously think that your Wimbledon Chase article would be accepted with a complete absence of references - grid or otherwise? Pull your finger out and provide some external links then we can think about moving it. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:08, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Possibly see you at the next London Wikimeet on April 14? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:41, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
Kingston Road
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello Launchballer, Thank you for editing and fixing Em-Amen article.
The change that you made indicates she was born as Amy Reeder Hadley. Instead, Hadley is the name of her ex-husband...Naraht (talk) 18:11, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
Everything Starts With an 'e'
Hi. I have declined your two redirect speedies.The 2007 one is too old for a WP:CSD#R3 (the point of limiting that to new redirects is that over time external links in may have been created which it is better not to break) and your new one seems to me possibly useful. Generally, we are reluctant to deleted redirects unless they are actually confusing or harmful - see WP:RFD#HARMFUL. Regards, JohnCD (talk)
Talkback (JohnCD)
Message added 15:48, 31 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Your Signature
I was hoping I could convince you to tone down your signature as it nearly blinds me when it is on the page with your color scheme. WP:SIG#Appearance and color might be of interest to you in doing this. Thank you. — User:Technical 13 ( C • M • View signature as intended) 14:20, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
- No, is the short answer to your request. There was a big uproar over my signature several years ago and it hasn't been changed since. If colour was an issue, it would have been mentioned at the time. And by the way, I suggest you address the glaring issues with your signature before you bollock me over mine.--Launchballer 14:37, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
- My signature conforms to the standards that have been set. As I'm sure you have read on my talk page, I've had many discussions about it, and have in response to those made it conform to all of the guidelines set in WP:SIG. As far as your signature goes, it is COMPLETELY non-compliant to WCAG 2.0 AA(A) standards with a contrast ratio of 3.19 according to [1] (The only way that that checker says it could be compliant would be if the font size was 18pt or greater, which it is not). — User:Technical 13 ( C • M • View signature as intended) 15:59, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
- I was asked on my talk page to come comment.
- My signature conforms to the standards that have been set. As I'm sure you have read on my talk page, I've had many discussions about it, and have in response to those made it conform to all of the guidelines set in WP:SIG. As far as your signature goes, it is COMPLETELY non-compliant to WCAG 2.0 AA(A) standards with a contrast ratio of 3.19 according to [1] (The only way that that checker says it could be compliant would be if the font size was 18pt or greater, which it is not). — User:Technical 13 ( C • M • View signature as intended) 15:59, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
- By my interpretation of WP:SIG, neither of your signatures are technically in violation, but both should be changed.
- Launchballer, my reading of WP:SIG tells me that there's no hard-and-fast rule about contrast, but as a courtesy to others, you should, of your own accord, make it easier on others people's eyes.
- Technical_13, while the max character count stated in WP:SIG only mentions code and not visible characters, your signature's visible length is excessive, and I'd give you the same advice as I did Launchballer: you should really change it of your own accord, despite being technically permitted to do what you're doing (and despite providing instructions for people to change how they view it should they have a problem with it -- which is not a solution). I could also do a little research to show you many discussions that ended with the decision that max character count for signatures actually pertains to the total including date/time stamp, which would put you significantly over. But I'm too lazy to do that.
- To sum up, both your signatures are annoying to many people. You both know this and you should want to endeavor to avoid annoying people, rather than arguing over what the "rules" technically allow. Equazcion (talk) 17:07, 1 Apr 2013 (UTC)
- For what it's worth, I agree with Equazcion. Jonathunder (talk) 01:25, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
- To sum up, both your signatures are annoying to many people. You both know this and you should want to endeavor to avoid annoying people, rather than arguing over what the "rules" technically allow. Equazcion (talk) 17:07, 1 Apr 2013 (UTC)
- Your issue with mine was length, so I was happy to shorten it in good faith. Now please adjust your color scheme Launch. It is blinding, which is both annoying and inconviencing. Thank you. — User:Technical 13 ( C • M • View signature as intended) 01:50, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
- T13, please strongly consider dropping the "View signature as intended" completely. You'll gain far more respect from working with consensus than maintaining conflict for the sake of it. —Sladen (talk) 10:20, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
- Having an extra link to something you feel passionate about is not only allowed, but an effect that I've seen administrators use to support/promote their WikiProjects and such. My signature is shorter with the extra link than it was with "Contributions" and "discussions" spelled out. My signature does no harm, it doesn't violate color requirements that say that anything that is like blinking or scrolling where as it causes undo pain or being forced to squint because it is too bright and there is too little of a contrast ratio is not allowed. That brightness in his signature physically hurts my eyes, and others as well from what I've read. — User:Technical 13 ( C • M • View signature as intended) 10:38, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
- Once again, you're arguing, for the sake of it. Instead one could simply make the sig change, and invest the same energy editing article space.[54 edits total] —Sladen (talk) 10:58, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
- Having an extra link to something you feel passionate about is not only allowed, but an effect that I've seen administrators use to support/promote their WikiProjects and such. My signature is shorter with the extra link than it was with "Contributions" and "discussions" spelled out. My signature does no harm, it doesn't violate color requirements that say that anything that is like blinking or scrolling where as it causes undo pain or being forced to squint because it is too bright and there is too little of a contrast ratio is not allowed. That brightness in his signature physically hurts my eyes, and others as well from what I've read. — User:Technical 13 ( C • M • View signature as intended) 10:38, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
- T13, please strongly consider dropping the "View signature as intended" completely. You'll gain far more respect from working with consensus than maintaining conflict for the sake of it. —Sladen (talk) 10:20, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
* I think 54 is decent for someone that has been actively editing just six weeks, and you have ignored the dozens of other edits I have invested in my userspace drafts. — User:Technical 13 ( C • M • View signature as intended) 11:05, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
- Of those 54 edits, 12 are from 2011, and 9 are from 2012. Please consider making the signature change (of your own accord), and focusing on useful contributions. —Sladen (talk) 11:11, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
- That still ignores the 20 userspace drafts, 124 WP:VPT, 18 WP:Help desk, 19 WP:TH, and numerous requested template fixes from requests on those boards. I'm done discussing it here and will file a formal complaint with the appropriate administrators/arbitrators group because his signature is in violation of "As some users have vision problems, be sparing with color. If you insist on using different colors in your signature, please ensure that the result will be readable by people with color blindness, defective color vision, and other visual disabilities." that requires him to be sparing with colors and ensure the results will be readable, which he was not and the result is not. — User:Technical 13 ( C • M • View signature as intended) 11:45, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
- Of those 54 edits, 12 are from 2011, and 9 are from 2012. Please consider making the signature change (of your own accord), and focusing on useful contributions. —Sladen (talk) 11:11, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Launchballer - I don't know how long you've had your signature (apparently I've commented on it in the past...), or how long WP:SIG has had the requirement on colour contrast. But it appears (taking Technical_13's word for it, as the ratio calculator isn't working for me) your signature doesn't meet the current guideline. This says As some users have vision problems, be sparing with color. If you insist on using different colors in your signature, please ensure that the result will be readable by people with color blindness, defective color vision, and other visual disabilities, and in the footnote to that mentions 5:1 for the contrast. If you've had this scheme for a while, maybe it's time for a new one? Rd232 talk 23:10, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
- Wow. I had absolutely no idea this thread was that long. I was busy editing article space at the time - an example which certain users may wish to follow. A refreshment of the discussion can be found here and here.
As you will see, the current signature was created by an administrator, after considerable discussion, after a complaint (minor issues tend not to be reported), so to complain further about it is insulting to Xeno, the administrator who created it. As far as I'm concerned, this is the same ruckus that was kicked up almost four years ago so it falls foul of WP:STICK and with all due respect I'm not being told what I can and can't do regarding my signature by someone who had the most messed up signature I've ever seen in my five or so years of editing Wikis (it still isn't much better).--Launchballer 00:28, 3 April 2013 (UTC)- I have been editing somewhat longer than that, using the default signature the whole time with no difficulty. Perhaps you might try it? Jonathunder (talk) 00:47, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- Actually, this is a solution to it. I find the boilerplate signature, well, boilerplate - it says nothing about me.--Launchballer 00:49, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- I have been editing somewhat longer than that, using the default signature the whole time with no difficulty. Perhaps you might try it? Jonathunder (talk) 00:47, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- Launchballer, I have good vision but even I find your signature difficult to read. Rockwell Extra Bold renders very poorly at default size; the "un" squishes together, the "h" looks extremely similar to the "b", and the "e" looks something like the "a", or possibly "o". If I did have impaired visual acuity it would almost certainly be impossible to read. Please change it. Regarding
As far as I'm concerned, this is the same ruckus that was kicked up almost four years ago
, well, in the sense that you still have a disruptive signature in one way or another, yes, it is still the same problem. — Hex (❝?!❞) 12:22, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- Launchballer, I have good vision but even I find your signature difficult to read. Rockwell Extra Bold renders very poorly at default size; the "un" squishes together, the "h" looks extremely similar to the "b", and the "e" looks something like the "a", or possibly "o". If I did have impaired visual acuity it would almost certainly be impossible to read. Please change it. Regarding
(Then why wouldn't they have mentioned it then?) Anyway, is this better?--Launchballer 13:23, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- No, that is not better. It fails the colour contrast guidelines and the text almost illegible at my normal screen resolution of 125%. At 100% resolution the letters fade into invisibility. The colors do not meet the color contrast guidelines; people with vision problems relating to contrast will not be able to read your name, and people with color blindness will not be able to see it at all. -- Dianna (talk) 14:11, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- Is this better?--Launchballer 14:14, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- It meets the contrast guidelines and looks okay at 125%, but at 100% the letters all start to meld together, becoming illegible. How about Launchballer ? Can everyone see that okay? -- Dianna (talk) 14:31, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- If you don't mind me asking, could I have a screendump of it melding together at 100%?--Launchballer 14:59, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- Here's how it looks for me, with the problems I described above: — Hex (❝?!❞) 15:50, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- To me, that clearly reads as "Launchballer". I don't see any problems with it.--Launchballer 16:00, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- Plainly you do not have any vision problems then. It needs to be legible to all users, not just those with good vision. -- Dianna (talk) 18:30, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- The problem described by Hex may be related to how Rockwell Extra Bold is supported by Windows XP. On Ubuntu the text is quite readable.
- Now, on other issues, is it OK if I immortalize this disagreement in the list of Wikipedia:Lamest edit wars. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 19:40, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
- You have a point, the machine on which I'm experiencing the issue (for one reason or another) is running XP. I haven't had a chance to check it on my usual Win7 box. That said, a lot of people still use XP, so the problem shouldn't be ignored. — Hex (❝?!❞) 09:46, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
- As Hex said, even XP is still used, the grammar School where I was until last year even had Win2000/NT. I would say that it would be best to let the font out, on linux (Open Suse with KDE GUI) it seems like the font isnt even used, which looks way better than with the fon on my Win7. and as on my comment after the outdent (My1xT is insecure Account of My1) a combination of fixing the colors and killing the font would be best...
- No, Petri, that would not be OK as there isn't any sort of edit war here, lame or otherwise. Jonathunder (talk) 20:59, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
- You have a point, the machine on which I'm experiencing the issue (for one reason or another) is running XP. I haven't had a chance to check it on my usual Win7 box. That said, a lot of people still use XP, so the problem shouldn't be ignored. — Hex (❝?!❞) 09:46, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
- Plainly you do not have any vision problems then. It needs to be legible to all users, not just those with good vision. -- Dianna (talk) 18:30, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- To me, that clearly reads as "Launchballer". I don't see any problems with it.--Launchballer 16:00, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- Here's how it looks for me, with the problems I described above: — Hex (❝?!❞) 15:50, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- If you don't mind me asking, could I have a screendump of it melding together at 100%?--Launchballer 14:59, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- It meets the contrast guidelines and looks okay at 125%, but at 100% the letters all start to meld together, becoming illegible. How about Launchballer ? Can everyone see that okay? -- Dianna (talk) 14:31, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- Is this better?--Launchballer 14:14, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
Well I think the blue on yellow is even worse than red on cyan... an a bit darker blue and a brighter yellow, but stronger than Dianna suggested, a bit like Launchballer is that ok???
Talkback (Dodger67)
Message added 08:51, 4 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Disambiguation link notification for April 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Nachna Onda Nei (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Queen, The Rising, Roger Taylor, Digital download and Bhangra
- Flying (Chas & Dave song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Rock, Pop and Dave Peacock
- Carshalton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Rose Hill and Wallington
- Generations of Love (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Cassette and Jesus Loves You
- Kaka Bhaniawala (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Bhangra
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:48, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks
In the courtesy of you commenting at my user page, I already know. Talk to me? See what I done? I am Applist 03:22 2013-4-5 UTC —Preceding undated comment added 03:22, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for the edits on Robert Lombardo!
Oh venerable Launchballer, I don't know how you came to do this ( perhaps by way of Dr Watson? ) but thank you so very much. The entry looks great. I am still fumbling with how to do things. Your edits are a great improvement. Let's hope it passes admin. I would love to play chess, but my skills are so abysmal that games are over very quickly. Thank you again for your help!Final4one (talk) 18:26, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
SPER's
Hi there, Can I just remind you to change the |answered=no to |ansered=yes if you have answered the request . This means that it no longer shows up in the backlog, and others don't need to waste time marking them done. Mdann52 (talk) 10:11, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
Sirah
I've undeleted the (very minimal) article to User:Launchballer/Sirah (rapper). Cheers, Whouk (talk) 11:33, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
Thank You! Articlespace placement Robert Lombardo
Thank you Launchballer. I greatly appreciate your intervention. I will keep track of article progress. I see no reason for it to be deleted, but we never know do we? Final4one (talk) 13:44, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
Why does this not come up when I just go to Wikipedia without signing in? It appears in the articlespace, if I search while logged in, but otherwise not.Final4one (talk) 14:30, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 08 April 2013
- Wikizine: WMF scales back feature after outcry
- WikiProject report: Earthshattering WikiProject Earthquakes
- News and notes: French intelligence agents threaten Wikimedia volunteer
- Arbitration report: Subject experts needed for Argentine History
- Featured content: Wikipedia loves poetry
- Technology report: Testing week
Disambiguation link notification for April 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- The Cats (reggae band) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to My Girl and Falling In Love
- Cleo Laine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to West London
- Don't Let It Go to Your Head (Jean Carne song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Electronic
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:17, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
Re: Scottsdale Mall
If you just want to create a disambiguation page for the mall, I don't think that you need the articles to be undeleted for that, since the clarification for each entry would be along the lines of ", in <insert place here>", or something terse like that. Though, at least per some discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scottsdale Centre Mall, there may be disagreement as to whether at least one instance of "Scottsdale Mall" warrants even a mention in a broader article on its corresponding town—in which case, we wouldn't have an entry for that particular mall, per WP:DABRELATED ("Do not include articles unless the term being disambiguated is actually described in the target article.").
Note that I myself have no opinion on whether the malls actually should or shouldn't be mentioned, since those deletion discussions occurred a few years ago and things may have changed; I'm just stating a potential caveat that I see.
If, after considering this, you still think it'd be useful to have those articles undeleted, you should make a request at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. I was inactive on Wikipedia for some years and, due to inactivity, am no longer an administrator, so I wouldn't be able to do the undeletion myself. —TKD [talk][c] 13:37, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
Thanks!
- Well, I haven't seen that one before. It was my pleasure.--Launchballer 09:01, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
- I wonder what inspired the attack, do I really come across as mean and opinionated? Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:10, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
- Not in the slightest. You come across as being one of the more reasonable editors on here. I mean, at User talk:Dodger67#The Casspir I would have absolutely exploded had he said that to me.--Launchballer 09:14, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
- I wonder what inspired the attack, do I really come across as mean and opinionated? Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:10, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
Talkback (Vejvančický)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Request for uninvolved 3rd party to comment.
Hello. I am requesting your opinions at Talk:Thomas Savage (died 1611)#Move and add to Thomas Savage as a third party to a discussion which I feel is nearing an impasse. I feel confident that if you chose to participate, your comments ideas and suggestions will be neutral and non-biased in favor or against either of the currently involved participants. If you do not wish to participate, I understand and respect your wishes. Thank you. Technical 13 (talk) 19:41, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 15 April 2013
- WikiProject report: Unity in Diversity: South Africa
- News and notes: Another admin reform attempt flops
- Featured content: The featured process swings into high gear
Disambiguation link notification for April 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Higher Ground (Jennifer Rush song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Electronic, Single, Pop and 45 RPM
- The Sun Machine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Electronic and Space Oddity
- Diamonds on the Soles of Her Shoes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to 45 RPM
- Go Deh Yaka (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Electronic
- Hot! Wild! Unrestricted! Crazy Love (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Electronic
- Lost in Music (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to We Are Family
- Lost in Music (Stereo MCs song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Electronic
- Reggaematic Funk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Electronic
- Spanish Harlem (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Stand By Me
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
LOL
Your edit summaries are cracking me up :D - Alison ❤ 21:18, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
ANI discussion split to DRV
Since you commented on this at ANI, please see Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2013_April_21#Beautiful_Store. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 12:56, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Launchballer. All of the deletion reviews for a particular day take place on the same page. I believe that your comment was intended for the deletion review of Beautiful Store rather than the one for two animated GIFs used in Captain Tsubasa 5: Hasha no Shōgō Campione. Accordingly, I have moved it to the appropriate section. [2] If this was not your intent, please feel free to undo this. --B (talk) 13:24, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Zac Poonen.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 13:33, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Music (John Miles song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to John Miles and Bob Marshall
- Here Come the Girls (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to 45 RPM
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:29, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 22 April 2013
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Editor Retention
- News and notes: Milan conference a mixed bag
- Featured content: Batfish in the Red Sea
- Arbitration report: Sexology case nears closure after stalling over topic ban
- Technology report: A flurry of deployments
Well, I was about to notify you tag at I moved the discussion to Talk:On the Rebound (instrumental)#Requested move, but it looks like you already realized it, given the fact that you have already posted a response. If I didn't post it the way you were intending to propose, my apologies; I put it the best that I could, based in what I saw in your proposal. Steel1943 (talk) 21:40, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
Talkback (Steel1943)
Message added 22:01, 25 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Bot Script
I just wanted to let you know that I am still working on a bot script to cleanly handle the 1000 links to chartarchive.org. It's just taking a bit of time to develop one.—cyberpower ChatOnline 02:45, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
- The script run is slowly coming to a close. You can follow Cyberbot II's contributions if you like and look at the slowly disappear from the list.—cyberpower ChatOnline 01:58, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
Talkback (Cyberpower78)
Message added 16:19, 28 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Whack Back!
I undid your undoing of my recent edit to Higher Ground as it is now a blue link and te article exists so it's considered suitable for inclusion on the list. DISEman (talk) 08:02, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 April 2013
- News and notes: Chapter furore over FDC knockbacks; First DC GLAM boot-camp
- In the media: Wikipedia's sexism; Yuri Gadyukin hoax
- Featured content: Wiki loves video games
- WikiProject report: Japanese WikiProject Baseball
- Traffic report: Most popular Wikipedia articles
- Arbitration report: Sexology closed; two open cases
- Recent research: Sentiment monitoring; UNESCO and systemic bias; and more
- Technology report: New notifications system deployed across Wikipedia
Disambiguation link notification for May 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- It Hurts So Good (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Single, Shazam, 45 RPM and Richard Stannard
- Don't Let It Die (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Demo, Hurricane Smith and Middle Of The Road
- Oh, Babe, What Would You Say? (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Hurricane Smith
- Ral Donner (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Norwood Park
- Sirah (rapper) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Mighty Mike
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Categorizing albums
Please stop WP:ALBUM and several WP:CFDs have concluded that all albums by artist should exist, even if that artist has only one album (per WP:SMALLCAT) and album redirects should be categorized for navigation. Either way, unilaterally emptying and deleting a category is out of process. If you need to respond, please notify me with {{tb}} or post the answer to my talk. Thanks. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 15:43, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
Re DJ Hoppa
Not a problem; hope your work on that goes well. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 16:23, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Meetup
I may be late but I hope to get to Penderel's Oak on Sunday. Will you be there? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:37, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Probably not, as my exams are approaching (my first one's the day after). I may attend the next one but I'm making no promises.--Launchballer 21:07, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
Please don't edit using MS Word
because this edit broke the H:ILL to ml:വിക്കിപീഡിയ:ധൈര്യശാലിയായി താളുകള് പുതുക്കുക - it became ml:വിക്കിപീഡിയ:ധൈര്യശാലിയായി താളുകള് പുതുക്കുക which doesn't exist. --Redrose64 (talk) 19:56, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot.
I have automatically detected that your edit to Business Magazine may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:10, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
The Krasnodar genre-warrior
(Krasnodar in south Russia near the Black Sea is where the 46.159.0.0/16 nuisance is based). I only blocked the range for 3 days (which expires 22:25 UTC tonight), because it is a very large one; but I have consulted a check-user who reckons there is not too much collateral damage, and it helps that it is in a non-English-speaking country, so that many users on that range will be interested in ru:wiki rather than en:wiki. So if he starts up again, I would be prepared to block for a week next time. JohnCD (talk) 20:49, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
- At least.--Launchballer 21:05, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 06 May 2013
- Technology report: Foundation successful in bid for larger Google subsidy
- Featured content: WikiCup update: full speed ahead!
- WikiProject report: Earn $100 in cash... and a button!
FYI
Just wanted to let you know Slowking4 removed a bunch of messages from their talk page [3]. While they are obviously entitled to do so per the guidelines, the way this was done so here seems a bit poor as they removed messages it appears you are replying to without making this clear so it may now seem that you are replying to things you may only be partially doing. Just wanted to let you know in case you wish to clarify or remove your message. Cheers. Nil Einne (talk) 13:55, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
- I saw it, but I wasn't entirely sure what to make of it. I suppose it's within guidelines, so I don't see what harm it could do.--Launchballer 14:17, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
A page you started has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Conrad Pugsley, Launchballer!
Wikipedia editor Barney the barney barney just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
interesting.
To reply, leave a comment on Barney the barney barney's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Disambiguation link notification for May 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited New York New York (Grandmaster Flash and the Furious Five song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Edward Fletcher (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:24, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
Removing a category
Hello. Why did you make this edit to {{User wikipedia/Administrator someday}}?--Rockfang (talk) 00:55, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
- I was trying to fix the categories; the template itself shouldn't've been in Category:Wikipedia administrator hopefuls.--Launchballer 06:27, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
- Ok. I don't think that the above edit removed the template from any category. I think your edit changed the userbox so it doesn't put users into the category. If I'm correct, do you mind if I revert that edit?--Rockfang (talk) 06:51, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
- Go ahead but I want that template removed from the category. Templates can't hope to do anything!--Launchballer 06:53, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
- I think this edit fixed it.--Rockfang (talk) 07:39, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
- Fantastic, thank you.--Launchballer 07:42, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
- I think this edit fixed it.--Rockfang (talk) 07:39, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
- Go ahead but I want that template removed from the category. Templates can't hope to do anything!--Launchballer 06:53, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
- Ok. I don't think that the above edit removed the template from any category. I think your edit changed the userbox so it doesn't put users into the category. If I'm correct, do you mind if I revert that edit?--Rockfang (talk) 06:51, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Panties
Sorry, but I've declined your speedy. It's not a song, it appears to be an EP or a mixtape by Tyler, The Creator & Jasper The Dolphin (whoever the hell they might be...). See http://mixtapemonkey.com/mixtape.php?m=205 Peridon (talk) 15:53, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
The edit history containing an attack
Here is the edit history for Soviet Union. Should I ignore the allegation that I was being disruptive? Robert McClenon (talk) 20:26, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
- I personally don't consider it disruptive. I personally find Peterzor's edits on that page a bit dubious. I'm going to revert myself and see where we get.--Launchballer 20:33, 13 May 2013 (UTC)
WP:BLPN notice
I have recently filed a inquiry at the Biographies of living persons noticeboard which directly involves some actions you have taken recently. I believe I have represented the actions and concerns fairly, but if I have unintentionally misrepresented your position please correct me. Cheers!Coffeepusher (talk) 16:36, 15 May 2013 (UTC)
ANI
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Coffeepusher (talk) 04:22, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 13 May 2013
- News and notes: WMF–community ruckus on Wikimedia mailing list
- WikiProject report: Knock Out: WikiProject Mixed Martial Arts
- Featured content: A mushroom, a motorway, a Munich gallery, and a map
- In the media: PR firm accused of editing Wikipedia for government clients; can Wikipedia predict the stock market?
- Arbitration report: Race and politics opened; three open cases
Disambiguation link notification for May 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Soul Serenade (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Willie Mitchell and 45 RPM
- Conrad Pugsley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Wizard
- Gold Plated (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Mike Vernon
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:48, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Wikipedia talk:Files for deletion/2013 May 21
Hi, I saw your comment at Wikipedia talk:Files for deletion/2013 May 21:
- I am currently using a school computer, and they have blocked Commons on 'Open Resource Sharing'. Could someone move these two over there?
I don't know what your request is, if you have any more questions you can add the {{helpme}} template here, and someone will be by to assist you. --kelapstick(bainuu) 10:19, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry about that (too early in the morning) I hadn't realized that it was a talk page (I had thought you had created the FFD page with that comment), and I removed the comment. I have since reverted myself. I will have a look at what you are asking. Sorry about that. --kelapstick(bainuu) 10:26, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Beautiful People (band)
There was nothing there worth restoring: the whole text of the deleted article was "Rachel Louisa Haig, a key member of this band, and Eleanor Showering, also a key member, are extremely beautiful people." JohnCD (talk) 14:23, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Thank you
Launchballer, thanks for taking care of this edit request. Right after you completed that, I noticed the wrong year was also in two other places in the article. Therefore, I just made this new edit request. Thanks, again. Sorry for not noticing it originally. --76.189.109.155 (talk) 07:56, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- I see you made the edit already. Thanks a lot. But there are two minor corrections to it that are needed. Thanks again. --76.189.109.155 (talk) 08:18, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- I see you edited it again. But sorry to say that you made a minor error and forgot to remove some stray text. See the edit request for what needs corrected. Thanks much. --76.189.109.155 (talk) 09:31, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- There's still a mistake in the edit. If you just copy and paste the corrected version I show in the edit request, it'll make it easier. Thanks. --76.189.109.155 (talk) 09:43, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- Everything's perfect now. If you remove the comma after 1989 in the first guy's listing, it'll be even more perfect. Where it says "in 1989,[3] at the age of 23" you can just remove the comma. It's unnecessary. Nice job. --76.189.109.155 (talk) 09:52, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- Done--Launchballer 09:57, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks, my friend. Good work. --76.189.109.155 (talk) 09:59, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- Done--Launchballer 09:57, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- Everything's perfect now. If you remove the comma after 1989 in the first guy's listing, it'll be even more perfect. Where it says "in 1989,[3] at the age of 23" you can just remove the comma. It's unnecessary. Nice job. --76.189.109.155 (talk) 09:52, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- There's still a mistake in the edit. If you just copy and paste the corrected version I show in the edit request, it'll make it easier. Thanks. --76.189.109.155 (talk) 09:43, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
- I see you edited it again. But sorry to say that you made a minor error and forgot to remove some stray text. See the edit request for what needs corrected. Thanks much. --76.189.109.155 (talk) 09:31, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 20 May 2013
- Foundation elections: Trustee candidates speak about Board structure, China, gender, global south, endowment
- WikiProject report: Classical Greece and Rome
- News and notes: Spanish Wikipedia leaps past one million articles
- In the media: Qworty incident continues
- Featured content: Up in the air
Delete
Can you help with delete request Platform Racing? The i-wanna-let-user-discuss-if-is-should-be-deleted are not special user friendly. concern=unotable flash game. No source who say why the flash game are notable. --89.249.2.53 (talk) 08:02, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Going Left Right (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Mark Taylor, Promo and Single
- Burundi Black (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Single and Limited Edition
- Beautiful People (band) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Chris Brown
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:02, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
No!
- Another edit like this and you will find yourself blocked. Except in cases of vandalism such as this, kindly leave it to me to decide when to delete messages. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:56, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
I had thought that so ridiculous a post it wasn't worth wasting your time with it... but okay. Point taken.--Launchballer 20:21, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Discogs.com
I believe this, added to a number of articles by User:81.111.157.180 is an unreliable source (user edited). I would appreciate your thoughts. Flat Out let's discuss it 10:38, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
- I disagree. Users can add entries, but - crucially - cannot edit anyone else's. It should be used with a pinch of salt, but it should be used.--Launchballer 10:40, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for your thoughts, much appreciated. Flat Out let's discuss it 10:41, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Category:Notable Deal or No Deal contestants
Category:Notable Deal or No Deal contestants, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Robofish (talk) 18:56, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 May 2013
- News and notes: First-ever community election for FDC positions
- In the media: Pagans complain about Qworty's anti-Pagan editing
- Foundation elections: Candidates talk about the Meta problem, the nation-based chapter model, world languages, and value for money
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Geographical Coordinates
- Featured content: Life of 2π
- Recent research: Motivations on the Persian Wikipedia; is science eight times more popular on the Spanish Wikipedia than the English Wikipedia?
- Technology report: Amsterdam hackathon: continuity, change, and stroopwafels
Hello, Launchballer. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Herb Rooney, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
- edit the page
- remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
- save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:28, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Please see the talk page for this article. Thanks. Inglok (talk) 11:12, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Herb Rooney for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Herb Rooney is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Herb Rooney until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 19:06, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
re Work (song)
Hello, I noticed you protected this redirect. Could you point the redirect to Work#Songs? Thank you.--Launchballer 16:55, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, no longer an admin, you'll have to ask a sysop or at WP:RFP. — Cirt (talk) 19:21, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Platform Racing
We cannot speedy them, think they will also need to be taken to PROD. GiantSnowman 09:51, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
- You should have said then. I have restored the article; I suggest you evidence some notability ASAP. GiantSnowman 09:57, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, I'm afraid I only noticed that once I'd restored the history, apologies. GiantSnowman 10:04, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
- Please have a look at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games#Platform Racing. GiantSnowman 11:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, I'm afraid I only noticed that once I'd restored the history, apologies. GiantSnowman 10:04, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Platform Racing for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Platform Racing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Platform Racing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GiantSnowman 12:47, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited I Will Remember, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Single (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:28, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
New York, New York Hotel and Casino
Well, that is based on how the company brands it. This also matches how many casinos are disambiguated. What other option are you thinking of? Vegaswikian (talk) 20:05, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
- Not saying that is the correct name, just that it is in line with established conventions. For the record, the article is actually at New York-New York Hotel and Casino. I believe that at one time this was branded with the dash in the name, that no longer appears to be the case. If you go to their web site, the tab at the top currently uses 'Las Vegas Hotel - New York-New York Hotel & Casino' but that is not what is on the logo. Several of the building reference sites use 'New York-New York' or 'New York-New York Hotel and Casino' or some variation. So again what other option are you thinking of? Vegaswikian (talk) 21:12, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
- New York, New York is the name of a city and the primary use for that title. It can not and should not be the name for the article on the hotel and casino. Vegaswikian (talk) 21:41, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
The latter of the two articles is currently too short—see nomination template for details. You could either bring it up to minimum length, another 500 prose characters, or just proceed with the Bliss article. Please respond there with your plans. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:11, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
- Done - please see the above link.--Launchballer 20:16, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 05 June 2013
- From the editor: Signpost developments
- Featured content: A week of portraits
- Discussion report: Return of the Discussion report
- News and notes: "Cease and desist", World Trade Organization says to Wikivoyage; Could WikiLang be the next WMF project?
- In the media: China blocks secure version of Wikipedia
- WikiProject report: Operation Normandy
- Technology report: Developers accused of making Toolserver fight 'pointless'
Deadlinks
Hi, please don't delete dead links. Often it is possible for techies to fix them or use Wayback machine to correct the link. That's why a deadlink tag is added. It's better to show the address for the original resource or replace the ref with one that works. Thanks Span (talk) 14:14, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- A floating [4] is absolutely useless unless it links somewhere and on popups, which omits proper references, appears as [#] and looks like a test. I call them burqed links because all you can see is some number-sized slot in the middle of two covers; at the end of the day, this isn't The Prisoner. This is Wikipedia. We do not identify references as numbers, we use their names. Although having said that, what is this Wayback machine that can be used to format dead links?--Launchballer 14:42, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- A wayback machine is a webservice which archives Websites from before so you can look on them in an earlier state
- here's an example [5] this shows Google at its beginning where it looked rather plain, and you also can use this to "revive" dead links...
- My1 15:14, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- Many refs aren't properly formatted; that isn't a reason to delete them. This ref did link somewhere but the address changed, is all. Span (talk) 15:23, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- Is there some way of knowing the parameters of when the website existed?--Launchballer 15:25, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- Many refs aren't properly formatted; that isn't a reason to delete them. This ref did link somewhere but the address changed, is all. Span (talk) 15:23, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Nathalie Holt
I've reverted the IP and protected for three days (auto-confirmed). However, I don't feel that someone noted for playing on four other people's album tracks and throwing eggs really is notable enough for an article. Peridon (talk) 14:29, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 18:10, 9 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Egging
Please see the talk page. Difficultly north (talk) - Simply south alt. 10:38, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- What talk page? The only reason I have any idea of what you mean is because I clicked (last change) and it had a link to your contributions in the diff. Please see my response.--Launchballer 10:44, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Redtop ref
Tabloid style, over dramatisation, sensationalism and exaggeration of a virtual non-event, see Tabloid_journalism#Red_top. Creating an entire section and creating a silly heading is deprecated by policy WP:NOTNEWS and WP:SENSATION. Leaky Caldron 11:48, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Natalie Holt for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Natalie Holt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natalie Holt until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. J Milburn (talk) 14:13, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Naomi Thompson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Nothing to Lose and Howard Jones
- Ego Trippin' (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Maurice Smith
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
That's been added. Took me a while to figure out which revision was best, though this one appears to at least have all the references and was the larger one so that's the one I provided. Wizardman 23:01, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Fort Grahame Waterdrome
yes, I made it last night and it got deleted before I'd woken up......plan is to get the Fort Grahame article per se done up soon, the location is not in BC Names but I found material on it, including staff, in the HBC files at the Manitoba archives; found the name on the reserve descriptions on Tsay Keh Dene Nation's article. Thanks.Skookum1 (talk) 08:19, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 12 June 2013
- Featured content: Mixing Bowl Interchange
- In the media: VisualEditor will "change world history"
- Discussion report: VisualEditor, elections, bots, and more
- Traffic report: Who holds the throne?
- Arbitration report: Two cases suspended; proposed decision posted in Argentine History
- WikiProject report: Processing WikiProject Computing
A page you started has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Swan Lake (The Cats song), Launchballer!
Wikipedia editor Kudpung just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Article seems to be OK, but please do not use blogs for references.
To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Speedy deletion nomination of Per Marin Tvengsberg
I have also tagged it for deletion because it doesn't credibly indicate the important/significance of the subject not least the fact that it borders patent nonsense. If you wish to start an article, please draft it in user-space. Oh, and per WP:SIG, your signature must link to either your user page, your user talk page or, for some reason that I do not fully understand, your contributions.--Launchballer 20:02, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Sorry I do not understand what you mean by the fact that it borders patent nonsense? --Svedjebruk (talk) 20:06, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Better. We regard patent nonsense as anything which contains no encyclopedic content whatsoever.--Launchballer 20:08, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
I have made the user page as you asked me to. Encyclopedia is a type of reference work – a compendium holding a summary of information from either all branches of knowledge or a particular branch of knowledge. Can you please take a look at http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Slash_and_burn. When you use the word whatsoever, is that an exact description or an ironic phrase contending irritated feelings. If the last, how have I irritated you? It has not been my intent.--Svedjebruk (talk) 20:20, 15 June 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Svedjebruk (talk • contribs)
--Svedjebruk (talk) 20:54, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
That's on WikiSource, which isn't Wikipedia and unfortunately I've never so much as even set foot on that site, so I can't judge inclusion standards there - although if that's acceptable there, that's probably why. As far as I'm concerned, there is very little, if any, encyclopaedic content in that article hence my usage of the word whatsoever. Generally, when people say userspace they mean subpages such as those at User:Launchballer#Subpages.--Launchballer 20:51, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
There are more and more references to Per Martin Tvengsberg and his books on Wikipedia and more to come. Just to give you a few examples of encyclopedic content, take a look at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_agriculture, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_age, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vikings. References to Per Martin Tvengsberg and his books. But if Wikipedia is better off without info about him I have no strong feelings about this. Follow the Wikipedia policy. --Svedjebruk (talk) 21:20, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Start Choppin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Promo, Single and Limited Edition
- John Kpiaye (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Matumbi
- List of Big Brother 14 housemates (UK) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to The Mirror
- List of The Apprentice candidates (UK series nine) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to The Telegraph
- Natalie Holt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to The Mirror
- Sneakbo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to The Wave
- Where You Been (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Out There
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Unblock-auto request
- Launchballer/archive/2013 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- 171.33.221.254 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by 10SatchellJ (talk · contribs). The reason given for 10SatchellJ's block is: "Vandalism-only account".
Decline reason: As you have edited since this unblock request, I can only assume you're not having this issue (✉→BWilkins←✎) 00:52, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
I am currently using a school computer and it has been autoblocked. I'm going home now, since I don't have another lesson today. Any chance of IP block exemption AT LEAST until 12:58, 19 June 2013 when it expires?--Launchballer 12:50, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Pugsley
You tagged User:Launchballer/Broken Complex for deletion with {{delete|Founder …}} which concealed the fact that you were proposing deletion. A simple {{db-u1}} would have been better - we don't need to know why you want it deleted. While we are on the subject of deletion …
I really am sorry to dampen your youthful enthusiasm by sending Conrad Pugsley to AfD. What clinched it for me was when someone mentioned John Gladden in the pub the other day - Google search. The blue Marlin is still on his roof - streetview. Now I would rate John Gladden as more notable in Norbury than Conrad Pugsley is Sutton. John made it to a few national sources but he does not have a Wikipedia article. OK, other stuff exists is never an argument for inclusion so, conversely, "other stuff does not exist" is never an argument for deletion which is why I have not cited Gladden in the AfD nomination. (If the AfD decides Pugsley is notable then you could try an article for Gladden and I will supply a photo of the marlin.) — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:57, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
- I tend to explain myself when I'm requesting deletion of an article which wasn't started by me (I requested the deleted text by the deleting administrator), because I feel like I'm flicking two fingers up at the restoring administrator. Anyway, Gladden (in my opinion) would only have one event to his name (albeit a 798lb one, how did that get up there?) whereas Pugsley has several, ranging from having a controversial sculpture of him produced to surviving a court case. He's undergoing another for failure to pay his rent (he changed his name to something ludicrous) but I'll let the press report that, and the other users decide the fate of the AfC. I've replied there.--Launchballer 20:31, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 June 2013
- Traffic report: Most popular Wikipedia articles of the last week
- WikiProject report: The Volunteer State: WikiProject Tennessee
- News and notes: Swedish Wikipedia's millionth article leads to protests; WMF elections—where are all the voters?
- Featured content: Cheaper by the dozen
- Discussion report: Citations, non-free content, and a MediaWiki meeting
- Technology report: May engineering report published
- Arbitration report: The Farmbrough amendment request—automation and arbitration enforcement
Swan Lake response
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Question possibly answered
I may have answered your question, please check it out.thanks, Prabash.Akmeemana 13:52, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Help request
Please try to find a suitable project for your request. I don't know what type of musician you are looking up but you can find projects that might be able to help by looking on the talk pages of other musicians like Talk:Beyoncé_Knowles or Talk:Mick Jagger.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 21:25, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- The Voice UK discography (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Killing Me Softly, Picking Up the Pieces and Mike Ward
- Colin Chisholm (singer) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Daily Record and Tom Jones
- List of Big Brother 14 housemates (UK) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Spotlight and Daily Star
- Bilbo Baggins (band) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Daily Record
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
I Love It Icona Pop thingy
Ayye, just wanted to let you know that I didn't introduce the information about Nancys Rubias or whatever. This was an IP edit by 79.151.167.79, and I just formatted it to make it logical English. Sorry if I messed some things up, computer keyboards are racist against llamas and other hooved animals. Helicopter Llama 20:41, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
J Mascis
Spin is a fairly well-known music magazine. Definitely not "dubious" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.68.177.25 (talk) 00:27, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 June 2013
- Traffic report: Most-viewed articles of the week
- In the media: Daily Dot on Commons and porn; Jimmy Wales accused of breaking Wikipedia rules in hunt for Snowden
- News and notes: Election results released
- Featured content: Wikipedia in black + Adam Cuerden
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Fashion
- Arbitration report: Argentine History closed; two cases remain suspended
June 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Controversy and criticism of Big Brother (UK) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- over Makosi's treatment | Manchester Evening News - menmedia.co.uk<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref>
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:02, 28 June 2013 (UTC)