Open main menu

Your submission at Articles for creation: September 2018 Jalalabad suicide bombing has been acceptedEdit

September 2018 Jalalabad suicide bombing, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 10:56, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Portal:Current eventsEdit

Do not mention weekdays and keep to present tenses if the event happened on the day the entry is being added to. For example:

Sunday events

  • Two people died in a car crash on Sunday.  N
  • Two people are killed in a car crash.  Y

CentreLeftRight 06:04, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nathaniel PetgraveEdit

Hello 11S117,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Nathaniel Petgrave for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

CentreLeftRight 18:36, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Joseph Metheny.jpgEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Joseph Metheny.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:28, 6 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Cristhian Rivera.jpg listed for discussionEdit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Cristhian Rivera.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. GMGtalk 20:32, 15 November 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Deaths of Tala and Rotana Farea for deletionEdit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deaths of Tala and Rotana Farea is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deaths of Tala and Rotana Farea until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chetsford (talk) 19:25, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Brendt Christensen.jpgEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Brendt Christensen.jpg, which you've attributed to Photo by: The News-Gazette/AP. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:20, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Murder of Missy BeversEdit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Murder of Missy Bevers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:11, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

December 2018Edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Thousand Oaks shooting. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ―Mandruss  00:12, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Elizabeth LecronEdit

 

The article Elizabeth Lecron has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NOTNEWS and WP:NCRIME. While there is some coverage in notable sources, the person is not WP:N outside of the crime, and I don't see the point in giving someone there own wp for doing something like this.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Comatmebro (talk) 07:12, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Elizabeth Lecron for deletionEdit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elizabeth Lecron is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elizabeth Lecron until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. CoolSkittle (talk) 07:20, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

December 2018Edit

  Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing an article on Wikipedia, you will see a small field labeled "Edit summary" shown under the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

 

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing →   Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! CoolSkittle (talk) 07:30, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Applewhite imageEdit

 
Ironically, this image is free. You can add it to any page where it's appropriate. This stuff is complicated and the rules don't always make a lot of sense.

I felt bad reverting you as I could see you were struggling to get the image formatting down, but unfortunatly that image is non-free content and therefore can only be used on pages for which a proper fair-use rationale has been provided. It is used on Applewhite's own article because, him being dead, it is not possible to obtain a new, free image and he is the subject of that article. Absent a similarly compelling rationale for inclusion in the Heaven's Gate it simply can't be used there.

I know that's a lot to digest. One of the easiest ways to tell if an image is free is to see if it was uploaded here or at Wikimedia Commons. Commons only hosts free-to-use material so anything there is ok and can be linked in the same manner. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:43, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Mass murder in 2019Edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Mass murder in 2019 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ... discospinster talk 20:47, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2018 Colts Neck mansion killingsEdit

 

The article 2018 Colts Neck mansion killings has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Event without lasting notability, all coverage is from within two weeks of the event in November 2018. Per WP:EVENTCRIT: "Routine kinds of news events (including most crimes, accidents, deaths, celebrity or political news, "shock" news, stories lacking lasting value such as "water cooler stories," and viral phenomena) – whether or not tragic or widely reported at the time – are usually not notable unless something further gives them additional enduring significance."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. signed, Rosguill talk 21:49, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

2019 Maidan Shahr attackEdit

I have redirected it to 2019 Afghan military base attack because it was created 17 minutes before you created 2019 Maidan Shahr attack.

You should consider searching on Wikipedia's search bar first before you create the article. You can expand 2019 Afghan military base attack if you still want to expand. Capitals00 (talk) 17:30, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of 2018 Colts Neck mansion killings for deletionEdit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2018 Colts Neck mansion killings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018 Colts Neck mansion killings until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. signed, Rosguill talk 18:10, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Maidan Shar attackEdit

 On 22 January 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Maidan Shar attack, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 21:17, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

April 2019Edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at File:Brian Golsby.jpg. Please stop providing false licensing to images. Magog the Ogre (tc) 03:35, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

"Murdered" war deadEdit

If the Patikul shootout is a mass murder, why do neither of the sources in the article, nor the article, mention anything about murder? Are you making this up? If so, it should be removed per WP:NOR. If the label can be verified, the lead sentence should note it was a mass murder upfront, making the reason for the category clear. There are no BLP concerns on this one, the supposed "murderers" having already been "murdered". InedibleHulk (talk) 05:37, April 24, 2019 (UTC)

Prejudice warningEdit

  Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at 2019 Sebring shooting. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Of the eight sources in the article, zero describe these as murders or a mass murder. They only say he was accused. Everyone has the right to a fair trial, and even if they didn't, this would still clearly be against Wikipedia's verifiability policy. InedibleHulk (talk) 05:54, April 24, 2019 (UTC)

And againEdit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page. Your latest round of edit summaries to untried killings suggests you can't distinguish between a murder and a homicide, or a crime and a criminal charge, or a reported fact and a personal opinion. Until you can, you are incompetent to edit crime articles. That's not an insult, it's a recommendation. InedibleHulk (talk) 22:23, April 25, 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2019 Lahore bombingEdit

 

The article 2019 Lahore bombing has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 23:33, 8 May 2019 (UTC)

July 2019Edit

  Your addition to Portal:Current events/2019 July 2 has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:32, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at List of terrorist incidents in July 2019. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block.

Please join the discussion at Talk:List of terrorist incidents in July 2019#Military attacks are not terrorism instead of reverting or undoing others' edits (diff, diff, diff, diff). Thank you. Levivich 23:58, 17 July 2019 (UTC)

In addition, fuck you and your stupid lies, you fucking stupid liar! If you need me banned to make your habitual lying here easier, I'd rather you use this legitimate personal attack against me than more of your patent nonsense. You're welcome. InedibleHulk (talk) 00:15, July 18, 2019 (UTC)
To be clear, "you" refers to 11S117. You're not wrong, Levivich. I daresay you're alright. InedibleHulk (talk) 00:34, July 18, 2019 (UTC)

Disruptive editing must stop nowEdit

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. You have repeatedly reverted my changes with nary an edit summary and completely refusing multiple requests to engage at article talk. Cease and desist this disruptive immediately or I will escalate the matter. Simonm223 (talk) 15:49, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussionEdit

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:11S117 reported by User:Levivich (Result: ). Thank you. Levivich 16:03, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019Edit

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at List of terrorist incidents in July 2019. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 17:08, 18 July 2019 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you startedEdit

Thanks for creating 2019 Morrisville killings.

User:Rosguill while examining this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

It's not clear that the subject meets WP:NEVENT. Coverage in sources above the local level appears to be limited to the week of the killings, which falls short of the WP:COVERAGE section of NEVENT.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

signed, Rosguill talk 23:35, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Lamont Stephenson.gif listed for discussionEdit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lamont Stephenson.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

October 2019Edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at List of terrorist incidents in January 2015, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 01:05, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

  Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing an article on Wikipedia, you will see a small field labeled "Edit summary" shown under the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

 

I noticed your recent edit to List of terrorist incidents in July 2019 does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing →   Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Drmies (talk) 01:06, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Manchester Arndale stabbingEdit

 

The article Manchester Arndale stabbing has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Mental health issue, no fatalities, WP:NOTNEWS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WWGB (talk) 03:53, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Return to the user page of "11S117".