Islam and democracy

  (Redirected from Islamic democracy)

There exist a number of perspectives on the relationship of Islam and democracy among Islamic political theorists, the general Muslim public, and Western authors.

Some modern Islamic thinkers, whose ideas were particularly popular in the 1970s and 1980s, rejected the notion of democracy as a foreign idea incompatible with Islam. Others have argued that traditional Islamic notions such as shura (consultation), maslaha (public interest), and ʿadl (justice) justify representative government institutions which are similar to Western democracy, but reflect Islamic rather than Western liberal values. Still others have advanced liberal democratic models of Islamic politics based on pluralism and freedom of thought.[1] Some Muslim thinkers have advocated secularist views of Islam.[2]

A number of different attitudes regarding democracy are also represented among the general Muslim public, with polls indicating that majorities in the Muslim world desire a political model where democratic institutions and values can coexist with the values and principles of Islam, seeing no contradiction between the two.[3][4][5] In practice, political history of the modern Muslim world has often been marked by undemocratic practices in states of both secular and religious character. Analysts have suggested a number of reasons for this, including the legacy of colonialism, oil wealth, the Arab-Israeli conflict, authoritarian secularist rulers, "the mind-set of Islam" and Islamic fundamentalism.

Traditional political conceptsEdit


Muslim democrats, including Ahmad Moussalli (professor of political science at the American University of Beirut), argue that concepts in the Quran point towards some form of democracy, or at least away from despotism. These concepts include shura (consultation), ijma (consensus), al-hurriyya (freedom), al-huqquq al-shar'iyya (legitimate rights). For example, shura (Al Imran – Quran 3:159, Ash-Shura – Quran 42:38) may include electing leaders to represent and govern on the community's behalf. Government by the people is not therefore necessarily incompatible with the rule of Islam, whilst it has also been argued that rule by a religious authority is not the same as rule by a representative of God. This viewpoint, however, is disputed by more traditional Muslims. Moussalli argues that despotic Islamic governments have abused the Quranic concepts for their own ends: "For instance, shura, a doctrine that demands the participation of society in running the affairs of its government, became in reality a doctrine that was manipulated by political and religious elites to secure their economic, social and political interests at the expense of other segments of society," (In Progressive Muslims 2003).

Sunni IslamEdit

Deliberations of the Caliphates, most notably the Rashidun Caliphate, were not democratic in the modern sense rather, decision-making power lay with a council of notable and trusted companions of Muhammad and representatives of different tribes (most of them selected or elected within their tribes).

In the early Islamic Caliphate, the head of state, the Caliph, had a position based on the notion of a successor to Muhammad's political authority, who, according to Sunnis, was ideally elected by the people or their representatives,[6] as was the case for the election of Abu Bakr, Umar bin Alkhattab, Uthman, and Ali as Caliph. After the Rashidun Caliphs, later Caliphates during the Islamic Golden Age had a much lesser degree of collective participation, but since "no one was superior to anyone else except on the basis of piety and virtue" in Islam, and following the example of Muhammad, later Islamic rulers often held public consultations with the people in their affairs.[7]

The legislative power of the Caliph (or later, the Sultan) was always restricted by the scholarly class, the ulama, a group regarded as the guardians of Islamic law. Since the law came from the legal scholars, this prevented the Caliph from dictating legal results. Sharia rulings were established as authoritative based on the ijma (consensus) of legal scholars, who theoretically acted as representatives of the Ummah (Muslim community).[8] After law colleges (madrasas) became widespread beginning with the 11th and 12th century CE, a student often had to obtain an ijaza-t al-tadris wa-l-ifta ("license to teach and issue legal opinions") in order to issue legal rulings.[9] In many ways, classical Islamic law functioned like a constitutional law.[8]

Shia IslamEdit

According to the Shia understanding, Muhammad named as his successor (as leader, with Muhammad being the final prophet), his son-in-law and cousin Ali. Therefore, the first three of the four elected "Rightly Guided" Caliphs recognized by Sunnis (Ali being the fourth), are considered usurpers, notwithstanding their having been "elected" through some sort of conciliar deliberation (which the Shia do not accept as a representative of the Muslim society of that time). The largest Shia grouping—the Twelvers branch—recognizes a series of Twelve Imams, the last of which (Muhammad al-Mahdi, the Hidden Imam) is still alive and the Shia are waiting for his reappearance.

Theoretical perspectives on democracyEdit


The early Islamic philosopher, Al-Farabi (c. 872–950), in one of his most notable works Al-Madina al-Fadila, theorized an ideal Islamic state which he compared to Plato's The Republic.[10] Al-Farabi departed from the Platonic view in that he regarded the ideal state to be ruled by the prophet, instead of the philosopher king envisaged by Plato. Al-Farabi argued that the ideal state was the city-state of Medina when it was governed by Muhammad, as its head of state, as he was in direct communion with God whose law was revealed to him. In the absence of the prophet, Al-Farabi considered democracy as the closest to the ideal state, regarding the republican order of the Rashidun Caliphate as an example within early Muslim history. However, he also maintained that it was from democracy that imperfect states emerged, noting how the republican order of the early Islamic Caliphate of the Rashidun caliphs was later replaced by a form of government resembling a monarchy under the Umayyad and Abbasid dynasties.[11]

Varieties of modern Islamic theoriesEdit

Muslih and Browers identify three major perspectives on democracy among prominent Muslims thinkers who have sought to develop modern, distinctly Islamic theories of socio-political organization conforming to Islamic values and law:[1]

  • The rejectionist Islamic view, elaborated by Sayyid Qutb and Abul A'la Maududi, condemns imitation of foreign ideas, drawing a distinction between Western democracy and the Islamic doctrine of shura (consultation between ruler and ruled). This perspective, which stresses comprehensive implementation of sharia, was widespread in the 1970s and 1980s among various movements seeking to establish an Islamic state, but its popularity has diminished in recent years.
  • The moderate Islamic view stresses the concepts of maslaha (public interest), ʿadl (justice), and shura. Islamic leaders are considered to uphold justice if they promote public interest, as defined through shura. In this view, shura provides the basis for representative government institutions that are similar to Western democracy, but reflect Islamic rather than Western liberal values. Hasan al-Turabi, Rashid al-Ghannushi, and Yusuf al-Qaradawi have advocated different forms of this view.
  • The liberal Islamic view is influenced by Muhammad Abduh's emphasis on the role of reason in understanding religion. It stresses democratic principles based on pluralism and freedom of thought. Authors like Fahmi Huwaidi and Tariq al-Bishri have constructed Islamic justifications for full citizenship of non-Muslims in an Islamic state by drawing on early Islamic texts. Others, like Mohammed Arkoun and Nasr Hamid Abu Zayd, have justified pluralism and freedom through non-literalist approaches to textual interpretation. Abdolkarim Soroush has argued for a "religious democracy" based on religious thought that is democratic, tolerant, and just. Islamic liberals argue for the necessity of constant reexamination of religious understanding, which can only be done in a democratic context.

Secularist viewsEdit

In the modern history of the Muslim world, the notion of secularism has acquired strong negative connotations due to its association with foreign colonial domination and removal of religious values from the public sphere. Traditional Islamic theory distinguishes between matters of religion (din) and state (dawla), but insists that political authority and public life must be guided by religious values.[12] Some Islamic reformists like Ali Abdel Raziq and Mahmoud Mohammed Taha have advocated a secular state in the sense of political order that does not impose any single interpretation of sharia on the nation, though they did not advocate secularism in the sense of a morally neutral exercise of state power. The Islamic scholar Abdullahi Ahmed An-Na'im has argued for a secular state built on constitutionalism, human rights and full citizenship, seeking to demonstrate that his vision is more consistent with Islamic history than visions of an Islamic state.[2] Proponents of Islamism (political Islam) reject secularist views that would limit Islam to a matter of personal belief and insist on implementation of Islamic principles in the legal and political spheres.[12] Moreover, the concept of 'Separation of Powers' was propounded by Ruhollah Khomeini.

Muhammad IqbalEdit

The modern Islamic philosopher, Muhammad Iqbal, viewed the early Islamic Caliphate as being compatible with democracy. He "welcomed the formation of popularly elected legislative assemblies" in the Muslim world as a "return to the original purity of Islam." He argued that Islam had the "gems of an economic and democratic organization of society", but that this growth was stunted by the monarchist rule of Umayyad Caliphate, which established the Caliphate as a great Islamic empire but led to political Islamic ideals being "repaganized" and the early Muslims losing sight of the "most important potentialities of their faith."[13]

Muhammad AsadEdit

Another Muslim scholar and thinker, Muhammad Asad, viewed democracy as perfectly compatible with Islam. In his book The Principles of State and Government in Islam, he notes:

Viewed from this historical perspective, 'democracy' as conceived in the modern West is infinitely nearer to the Islamic than to the ancient Greek concept of liberty; for Islam maintains that all human beings are socially equal and must, therefore, be given the same opportunities for development and self-expression. On the other hand, Islam makes it incumbent upon Muslims to subordinate their decisions to the guidance of the Divine Law revealed in the Qur'ãn and exemplified by the Prophet: an obligation which imposes definite limits on the community's right to legislate and denies to the 'will of the people' that attribute of sovereignty which forms so integral a part of the Western concept of democracy.[14]

Abul A'la MaududiEdit

Islamist writer and politician Abul A'la Maududi, conceived of an "Islamic state" that would eventually "rule the earth".[15] The antithesis of secular Western democracy, it would follow an all-embracing Sharia law. Maududi called the system he outlined a "theo-democracy", which he argued would be different from a theocracy as the term is understood in the Christian West, because it would be run by the entire Muslim community (pious Muslims who followed sharia), rather than ruled by a clerical class in the name of God.[1][16] Maududi's vision has been criticized (by Youssef M. Choueiri) as an

ideological state in which legislators do not legislate, citizens only vote to reaffirm the permanent applicability of God's laws, women rarely venture outside their homes lest social discipline be disrupted, and non-Muslims are tolerated as foreign elements required to express their loyalty by means of paying a financial levy.[17][18]

L. Ali KhanEdit

Legal scholar L. Ali Khan argues that Islam is fully compatible with democracy. In his book, A Theory of Universal Democracy, Khan provides a critique of liberal democracy and secularism. He presents the concept of "fusion state" in which religion and state are fused. There are no contradictions in God's universe, says Khan. Contradictions represent the limited knowledge that human beings have. According to the Quran and the Sunnah, Muslims are fully capable of preserving spirituality and self-rule.[19]

Javed Ahmed GhamdiEdit

Religious scholar, Javed Ahmed Ghamdi interprets the Quranic verses as ''The collective affairs of Muslims are run on the basis of mutual consultations'' (42:37).[20] He is of the view that all the matters of a Muslim state must be sought out through consultations.The parliamentary bodies would provide that platform to practice and implement those consultations.

Views of the general Muslim publicEdit

Esposito and DeLong-Bas distinguish four attitudes toward Islam and democracy prominent among Muslims today:[21]

  • Advocacy of democratic ideas, often accompanied by a belief that they are compatible with Islam, which can play a public role within a democratic system, as exemplified by many protestors who took part in the Arab Spring uprisings;
  • Support for democratic procedures such as elections, combined with religious or moral objections toward some aspects of Western democracy seen as incompatible with sharia, as exemplified by Islamic scholars like Yusuf al-Qaradawi;
  • Rejection of democracy as a Western import and advocacy of traditional Islamic institutions, such as shura (consultation) and ijma (consensus), as exemplified by supporters of absolute monarchy and radical Islamist movements;
  • Belief that democracy requires restricting religion to private life, held by a minority in the Muslim world.

Polls conducted by Gallup and PEW in Muslim-majority countries indicate that most Muslims see no contradiction between democratic values and religious principles, desiring neither a theocracy, nor a secular democracy, but rather a political model where democratic institutions and values can coexist with the values and principles of Islam.[3][4][5]

Islam and democracy in practiceEdit


There are several ideas on the relationship between Islam in the Middle East and democracy. Waltz writes that transformations to democracy seemed on the whole to pass by the Islamic Middle East at a time when such transformations were a central theme in other parts of the world, although she does note that, of late, the increasing number of elections being held in the region indicates some form of adoption of democratic traditions.[22]

Following the Arab Spring, professor Olivier Roy of the European University Institute in an article in Foreign Policy has described political Islam as "increasingly interdependent" with democracy, such that "neither can now survive without the other".[23]

Orientalist scholars offer another viewpoint on the relationship between Islam and democratisation in the Middle East. They argue that the compatibility is simply not there between secular democracy and Arab-Islamic culture in the Middle East which has a strong history of undemocratic beliefs and authoritarian power structures.[24] Kedourie, a well known Orientalist scholar, said for example: "to hold simultaneously ideas which are not easily reconcilable argues, then, a deep confusion in the Arab public mind, at least about the meaning of democracy. The confusion is, however, understandable since the idea of democracy is quite alien to the mind-set of Islam."[25] A view similar to this that understands Islam and democracy to be incompatible because of seemingly irreconcilable differences between Sharia and democratic ideals is also held by some Islamists.

However, within Islam there are ideas held by some that believe Islam and democracy in some form are indeed compatible due to the existence of the concept of shura (meaning consultation) in the Quran. Views such as this have been expressed by various thinkers and political activists in the Middle East.[26] They continue to be the subject of controversy, e.g. at the second Dubai Debates, which debated the question "Can Arab and Islamic values be reconciled with democracy?"[27]

Brian Whitaker's 'four major obstacles'Edit

Writing on The Guardian website,[28] Brian Whitaker, the paper's Middle East editor, argued that there were four major obstacles to democracy in the region: 'the imperial legacy', 'oil wealth', 'the Arab–Israeli conflict' and 'militant or "backward-looking" Islam'.

The imperial legacy includes the borders of the modern states themselves and the existence of significant minorities within the states. Acknowledgment of these differences is frequently suppressed usually in the cause of "national unity" and sometimes to obscure the fact that minority elite is controlling the country. Brian Whitaker argues that this leads to the formation of political parties on ethnic, religious or regional divisions, rather than over policy differences. Voting therefore becomes an assertion of one's identity rather than a real choice.

The problem with oil and the wealth it generates is that the states' rulers have the wealth to remain in power, as they can pay off or repress most potential opponents. Brian Whitaker argues that as there is no need for taxation there is less pressure for representation. Furthermore, Western governments require a stable source of oil and are therefore more prone to maintain the status quo, rather than push for reforms which may lead to periods of instability. This can be linked into political economy explanations for the occurrence of authoritarian regimes and lack of democracy in the Middle East, particularly the prevalence of rentier states in the Middle East.[29] A consequence of the lack of taxation that Whitaker talks of in such rentier economies is an inactive civil society. As civil society is seen to be an integral part of democracy it raises doubts over the feasibility of democracy developing in the Middle East in such situations.[24]

Whitaker's third point is that the ArabIsraeli conflict serves as a unifying factor for the countries of the Arab League, and also serves as an excuse for repression by Middle Eastern governments. For example, in March 2004 Sheikh Mohammad Hussein Fadlallah, Lebanon's leading Shia cleric, is reported as saying "We have emergency laws, we have control by the security agencies, we have stagnation of opposition parties, we have the appropriation of political rights – all this in the name of the Arab-Israeli conflict". The West, especially the US, is also seen as a supporter of Israel, and so it and its institutions, including democracy, are seen by many Muslims as suspect. Khaled Abou El Fadl, a lecturer in Islamic law at the University of California comments "modernity, despite its much scientific advancement, reached Muslims packaged in the ugliness of disempowerment and alienation."

This repression by secularistic Arab rulers has led to the growth of radical Islamic movement groups, as they believe that the institution of an Islamic theocracy will lead to a more just society. Unfortunately, these groups tend to be very intolerant of alternative views, including the ideas of democracy. Many Muslims who argue that Islam and democracy are compatible live in the West, and are therefore seen as "contaminated" by non-Islamic ideas.[28]



Early in the history of the state of Pakistan (March 12, 1949), a parliamentary resolution (the Objectives Resolution) was adopted stating the objectives on which the future constitution of the country was to be based. It contained the basic principles of both Islam and Western Democracy, in accordance with the vision of the founders of the Pakistan Movement (Muhammad Iqbal, Muhammad Ali Jinnah, Liaquat Ali Khan).[64] It proclaimed:

Sovereignty belongs to Allah alone but He has delegated it to the State of Pakistan through its people for being exercised within the limits prescribed by Him as a sacred trust.

  • The State shall exercise its powers and authority through the elected representatives of the people.
  • The principles of democracy, freedom, equality, tolerance and social justice, as enunciated by Islam, shall be fully observed.
  • Muslims shall be enabled to order their lives in the individual and collective spheres in accordance with the teachings of Islam as set out in the Quran and Sunnah.
  • Provision shall be made for the religious minorities to freely profess and practice their religions and develop their cultures.

This resolution was included in the 1956 constitution as preamble and in 1985[65] it was inserted in the constitution itself as Article 2 and Schedule item 53[66] (but with the word "freely" in Provision shall be made for the religious minorities to freely profess and practice their religions and develop their cultures, removed.[67]). The resolution was inserted again in the constitution in 2010,[68] with the word "freely" reinstated.[67]

However, Islamisation has proceeded slowly in Pakistan, and Islamists and Islamic parties and activists have expressed frustration that sharia law has not yet been fully implemented.



Since the revolution in Iran, the largest Shia country, Twelver Shia political thought has been dominated by that of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the founder and leader of the revolution. Khomeini argued that in the absence of the Hidden Imam and other divinely-appointed figures (in whom ultimate political authority rests), Muslims have not only the right, but also the obligation to establish an "Islamic state".[69] To that end they must turn to scholars of Islamic law (fiqh) who are qualified to interpret the Quran and the writings of the imams.

Once in power and recognizing the need for more flexibility, Khomeini modified some earlier positions, insisted the ruling jurist need not be one of the most learned, that Sharia rule was subordinate to interests of Islam (Maslaha—"expedient interests" or "public welfare"[70]), and the "divine government" as interpreted by the ruling jurists, who could overrule Sharia if necessary to serve those interests. The Islamic "government, which is a branch of the absolute governance of the Prophet of God, is among the primary ordinances of Islam, and has precedence over all 'secondary' ordinances."

The last point was made in December 1987, when Khomieni issued a fatwa in support of the Islamic government's attempt to pass a labor protection bill not in accordance with sharia.[71][72] He ruled that in the Islamic state, governmental ordinances were primary ordinances,[73] and that the Islamic state has absolute right (Persian: ولايت مطلقه‎) to enact state commandments, taking precedence over "all secondary ordinances such as prayer, fasting, and pilgrimage".

Were the powers of government to lie only within the framework of secondary divine decrees, the designation of the divine government and absolute deputed guardianship (wilayat-i mutlaqa-yi mufawwada) to the Prophet of Islam (peace be upon him and his progeny) would have been in practice entirely without meaning and content. ... I must point out, the government which is a branch of the absolute governance of the Prophet of God is among the primary ordinances of Islam, and has precedence over all secondary ordinances such as prayer (salat), fasting (sawm), and pilgrimage (hajj).

The idea and concept of Islamic democracy has been accepted by many Iranian clerics, scholars and intellectuals.[74][75][76][77][78] The most notable of those who have accepted the theory of Islamic democracy is probably Iran's Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who mentions Islamic democracy as "Mardomsalarie Dini" in his speeches.

There are also other Iranian scholars who oppose or at least criticise the concept of Islamic democracy. Among the most popular of them are Ayatollah Naser Makarem Shirazi[79] who have written: "If not referring to the people votes would result in accusations of tyranny then it is allowed to accept people vote as a secondary commandment."[80] Also Mohammad-Taqi Mesbah-Yazdi has more or less the same viewpoint.


Some Iranians, including Mohammad Khatami, categorize the Islamic republic of Iran as a kind of religious democracy.[81] They maintain that Ayatollah Khomeini held the same view as well and that's why he strongly chose "Jomhoorie Eslami" (Islamic Republic) over "Hokoomate Eslami" (Islamic State).

Others maintain that not only is the Islamic Republic of Iran undemocratic (see Politics of Iran) but that Khomeini himself opposed the principle of democracy in his book Hokumat-e Islami: Wilayat al-Faqih, where he denied the need for any legislative body saying, "no one has the right to legislate ... except ... the Divine Legislator", and during the Islamic Revolution, when he told Iranians, "Do not use this term, 'democratic.' That is the Western style."[82] Although it is in contrast with his commandment to Mehdi Bazargan. It is a subject of lively debate among pro-Islamic Iranian intelligentsia. Also they maintain that Iran's sharia courts, the Islamic Revolutionary Court, blasphemy laws of the Islamic Republic of Iran, and the Mutaween (religious police) violate the principles of democratic governance.[83] However, it should be understood that when a democracy is accepted to be Islamic by people, the law of Islam becomes the democratically ratified law of that country. Iranians have ratified the constitution in which the principle rules are explicitly mentioned as the rules of Islam to which other rules should conform.Ayatollah khomeini fervently believed that principles of democracy can't provide the targeted justice of Islam in the Sharia and Islamic thoughts.(Mohaghegh.Behnam 2014) This contrast of view between the two Iranian head leaders of this Islamic country, as above mentioned about Khatami's and Khomeini's views have provisionally been being a case of disaffiliation of nearly half a country in most probable political coincidence, so the people cognizant of this heterogeneous political belief shall not be affiliated by newly formed views of democratic principles.(Mohaghegh, Behnam 2014)

A number of deviations from traditional sharia regulations have been noted in Iran

... the financial system has barely been Islamized; Christians, for example, are not subject to a poll tax and pay according to the common scheme. Insurance is maintained (even though chance, the very basis for insurance should theoretically be excluded from all contracts). The contracts signed with foreigners all accept the matter of interest.[84]

Indices of democracy in Muslim countriesEdit

There are several non-governmental organizations that publish and maintain indices of freedom in the world, according to their own various definitions of the term, and rank countries as being free, partly free, or unfree using various measures of freedom, including political rights, economic rights, freedom of the press and civil liberties.

The following lists Muslim-majority countries and shows the scores given by two frequently used indices: Freedom in the World (2018)[85] by the US-based Freedom House and the 2019 Democracy Index[86] by the Economist Intelligence Unit. These indices are frequently used in Western media, but have attracted some criticism and may not reflect recent changes.

Key: * – Electoral democracies – Disputed territory (according to Freedom House)
Location Democracy Index Score Democracy Index Rank Democracy Index Category Freedom in the World Status Type of government Religion and State
Afghanistan 2.85 141 Authoritarian regime Not free Unitary presidential Islamic republic State religion
Albania 5.89 79 Hybrid regime Partly free Parliamentary system Secular state
Algeria 4.01 113 Hybrid regime Not free Unitary parliamentary constitutional republic State religion
Azerbaijan 2.75 146 Authoritarian regime Not free Presidential system Secular state
Bahrain 2.55 149 Authoritarian regime Not free Constitutional monarchy State religion
*Bangladesh 5.88 80 Hybrid regime Partly free Parliamentary republic Secular state
*Bosnia and Herzegovina 4.86 102 Hybrid regime Partly free Parliamentary republic Secular state
Brunei Authoritarian regime Not free Absolute monarchy State religion
Burkina Faso 4.04 112 Hybrid regime Partly free Semi-presidential system Secular state
Chad 1.61 163 Authoritarian regime Not free Presidential system Secular state
Comoros 3.15 131 Authoritarian regime Partly free Presidential system, Federal republic State religion
Djibouti 2.77 144 Authoritarian regime Not free Semi-presidential system Secular state
Egypt 3.06 137 Authoritarian regime Not free Unitary semi-presidential constitutional republic State religion
Gambia 4.33 107 Hybrid regime Partly free Presidential system Secular state
Guinea 3.14 132 Authoritarian regime Partly free Presidential system Secular state
Guinea-Bissau 2.63 148 Authoritarian regime Partly free semi-presidential Secular state
*Indonesia 6.48 64 Flawed democracy Partly free Presidential system Secular state
Iran 2.38 151 Authoritarian regime Not free Unitary presidential constitutional republic subject to a Supreme Leader State religion
Iraq 3.74 118 Authoritarian regime Not free Parliamentary republic State religion
Ivory Coast 4.05 111 Hybrid regime Partly free Presidential system Secular state
Jordan 3.93 114 Authoritarian regime Partly free Constitutional monarchy State religion
Kazakhstan 2.94 139 Authoritarian regime Not free Presidential system Secular state
Kosovo - Partly free Secular state
Kuwait 3.93 114 Authoritarian regime Partly free Constitutional monarchy State religion
Kyrgyzstan 4.89 101 Hybrid regime Partly free Parliamentary republic Secular state
Lebanon 4.36 106 Hybrid regime Partly free Confessionalist Parliamentary republic Secular state
Libya 2.02 156 Authoritarian regime Not free Provisional government State religion
Malaysia 7.16 43 Flawed democracy Partly free Constitutional monarchy, parliamentary democracy State religion
Maldives Partly free State religion
Mali 4.92 100 Hybrid regime Partly free Semi-presidential system Secular state
Mauritania 3.92 116 Authoritarian regime Not free Islamic republic, Semi-presidential system Islamic state
Morocco 5.10 96 Hybrid regime Partly free Constitutional monarchy State religion
Niger 3.29 127 Authoritarian regime Partly free Semi-presidential system Secular state
Nigeria 4.12 109 Hybrid regime Partly free Federalism, presidential system Secular state, Islamic state (only in the northern Nigerian states)
Oman 3.06 137 Authoritarian regime Not free Absolute monarchy State religion
Pakistan 4.25 108 Hybrid regime Partly free Federalism, parliamentary republic Islamic state[87][88][89]
Palestine (occupied by Israel) 3.89 117 Authoritarian regime Not free Semi-presidential system Secular state (in West Bank), de facto Islamic state (in Gaza Strip)
Qatar 3.19 128 Authoritarian regime Not free Absolute monarchy State religion
Saudi Arabia 1.93 159 Authoritarian regime Not free Islamic absolute monarchy Islamic state
*Senegal 5.81 82 Hybrid regime Free Semi-presidential system Secular state
*Sierra Leone 4.86 102 Hybrid regime Partly free Presidential system Secular state
Somalia Not free Federalism, Semi-presidential system State religion
Somaliland (Somalia) Partly free
Sudan 2.70 147 Authoritarian regime Not free Federalism, presidential system Secular state (de jure), Islamic state (de facto)
Syria 1.43 164 Authoritarian regime Not free Semi-presidential system Secular state
Tajikistan 1.93 159 Authoritarian regime Not free Presidential system Secular state
*Tunisia 6.72 53 Flawed democracy Free Semi-presidential system State religion
Turkey 4.09 110 Hybrid regime Not free Presidential system Secular state[90][91]
Turkmenistan 1.72 162 Authoritarian regime Not free Presidential system, one-party state Secular state
United Arab Emirates 2.76 145 Authoritarian regime Not free Federalism, Constitutional monarchy State religion
Uzbekistan 2.01 157 Authoritarian regime Not free Presidential system Secular state
Western Sahara (controlled by Morocco) Not free
Yemen 1.95 158 Authoritarian regime Not free Provisional government Islamic state

Islamic democratic parties and organizationsEdit

This is a list of parties and organizations which aim for the implementation of Sharia or an Islamic State, or subscribe to Muslim identity politics, or in some other way fulfil the definitions of political Islam, activist Islam, or Islamism laid out in this article; or have been widely described as such by others.

Country or scope Movement/s
  Bangladesh Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami[93][94]
  Finland Finnish Islamic Party
  Israel Ra'am
  Jordan Islamic Action Front[98]
  Kuwait Hadas
  Malaysia United Malays National Organisation[108][109]

Malaysian United Indigenous Party

  Morocco Justice and Development Party[110][111]
  Rwanda Islamic Democratic Party
  Sudan National Umma Party Sudan
  Somalia Peace and Development Party
  Syria Muslim Brotherhood of Syria[116][117][118]
  Tajikistan Islamic Renaissance Party of Tajikistan[119]

See alsoEdit


  1. ^ a b c Muslih, Muhammad; Browers, Michaelle (2009). "Democracy". In John L. Esposito (ed.). The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Islamic World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. ^ a b John L. Esposito. "Rethinking Islam and Secularism" (PDF). Association of Religion Data Archives. pp. 13–15. Retrieved April 20, 2019.
  3. ^ a b Esposito, John L.; DeLong-Bas, Natana J. (2018). Shariah: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford University Press. p. 145.
  4. ^ a b "Most Muslims Want Democracy, Personal Freedoms, and Islam in Political Life". Pew Research Center. July 10, 2012.
  5. ^ a b Magali Rheault; Dalia Mogahed (October 3, 2017). "Majorities See Religion and Democracy as Compatible". Gallup.
  6. ^ Encyclopedia of Islam and the Muslim World (2004), vol. 1, p. 116-123.
  7. ^ Weeramantry, Christopher G. (1997). Justice Without Frontiers: Furthering Human Rights. The Hague: Kluwer Law International. p. 135. ISBN 90-411-0241-8.
  8. ^ a b Feldman, Noah (March 16, 2008). "Why Shariah?". The New York Times. Retrieved October 5, 2008.
  9. ^ Makdisi, George (April–June 1989). "Scholasticism and Humanism in Classical Islam and the Christian West". Journal of the American Oriental Society. 109 (2): 175–182 [175–77]. doi:10.2307/604423. JSTOR 604423.
  10. ^ Arabic and Islamic Natural Philosophy and Natural Science. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. 2018.
  11. ^ Bontekoe, Ronald; Stepaniants, Mariėtta Tigranovna (1997). Justice and Democracy: Cross-Cultural Perspectives. University of Hawaii Press. p. 251. ISBN 0-8248-1926-8.
  12. ^ a b John L. Esposito, ed. (2014). "Secularism". The Oxford Dictionary of Islam. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  13. ^ Bontekoe, Ronald; Stepaniants, Mariėtta Tigranovna (1997). Justice and Democracy: Cross-Cultural Perspectives. University of Hawaii Press. p. 253. ISBN 0-8248-1926-8.
  14. ^ "Muhammad Quote from his book".
  15. ^ Maududi, Sayyid Abdul al'al (1960). Political Theory of Islam (1993 ed.). Lahore, Pakistan: Islamic Publications. p. 35. the power to rule over the earth has been promised to the whole community of believers. [italics original]
  16. ^ Ullah, Haroon K. (2013). Vying for Allah's Vote: Understanding Islamic Parties, Political Violence, and Extremism in Pakistan. Georgetown University Press. p. 79. ISBN 978-1-62616-015-6. Maududi proposed forming a Muslim theodemocracy in which Islamic law would guide public policy in all areas of life. (Maududi specifically rejected the term 'theocracy' to describe his ideal state, arguing that the truly Islamic state would be ruled not by the ulema but by the entire Muslim community.)
  17. ^ Choueiri, p.111, quoted in Ruthven, Malise (2000). Islam in the World (2nd ed.). Penguin. p. 70.
  18. ^ Choueiri, Youssef M. (2010). Islamic Fundamentalism: The Story of Islamist Movements (3rd ed.). London: Bloomsbury Continuum. p. 144. ISBN 978-0-8264-9801-4.
  19. ^ "Abstracts: A Theory of Universal Democracy". University of Wisconsin Law School. Archived from the original on October 6, 2011. Retrieved November 3, 2014.
  20. ^ "Is Democracy Compatible with Islam? | Javed Ahmad Ghamidi". Retrieved September 24, 2019.
  21. ^ Esposito, John L.; DeLong-Bas, Natana J. (2018). Shariah: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford University Press. pp. 142–143.
  22. ^ Waltz, S.E., 1995, Human Rights & Reform: Changing the Face of North African Politics, London, University of California Press Ltd
  23. ^ Roy, Olivier (April 16, 2012). "The New Islamists". Foreign Policy.
  24. ^ a b Weiffen, Britta (2004). "The Cultural-Economic Syndrome: Impediments to Democracy in the Middle East" (PDF). Comparative Sociology. 3 (3–4): 353–375. doi:10.1163/1569133043019780. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 6, 2009 – via European Public Choice Society (EPCS).
  25. ^ Kedourie, E., 1994, Democracy and Arab Political Culture, London, Frank Cass & Co Ltd, page 1
  26. ^ Esposito, J. & Voll, J.,2001, Islam and Democracy, Humanities, Volume 22, Issue 6
  27. ^ "Can Arab and Islamic values be reconciled with democracy?". YouTube. Retrieved November 3, 2014.
  28. ^ a b Whitaker, Brian (March 15, 2004). "Beware instant democracy". The Guardian. Retrieved November 3, 2014.
  29. ^ Beblawi, H., 1990, The Rentier State in the Arab World, in Luciani, G., The Arab State, London, Routledge
  30. ^ Slimani, Salah (May 10, 2012). "Islamists Predict Victory as Algerians Head to the Polls". Bloomberg Businessweek. Archived from the original on May 18, 2012.
  31. ^ "Algeria's Islamists confident of election victory". RNW. May 7, 2012. Archived from the original on October 25, 2014.
  32. ^ Schemm, Paul (May 11, 2012). "Algerian Islamists fall to govt party in election". Associated Press. Archived from the original on January 9, 2016 – via HighBeam Research.
  33. ^ Faucon, Benoît (May 11, 2012). "Algerian Ruling Party Beats Islamists in Vote". The Wall Street Journal.
  34. ^ "Guide to Bahrain's politics". The Guardian. February 15, 2011.
  35. ^ Riaz, Ali (2003). ""God Willing": The Politics and Ideology of Islamism in Bangladesh". Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East. 23 (1–2): 301–320. doi:10.1215/1089201X-23-1-2-301.
  36. ^ "Obituary: Alija Izetbegovic". BBC. October 19, 2003. Retrieved January 1, 2010.
  37. ^ Binder, David (October 20, 2003). "Alija Izetbegović, Muslim Who Led Bosnia, Dies at 78". The New York Times.
  38. ^ Kirkpatrick, David D. (January 21, 2012). "Islamists Win 70% of Seats in the Egyptian Parliament". The New York Times.
  39. ^ a b Evans, Kevin R (2003). The history of political parties & general elections in Indonesia. Jakarta:Arise Consultancies.
  40. ^ Schwarz, Adam (1994). A Nation in Waiting: Indonesia in the 1990s. Allen & Unwin. pp. 172. ISBN 0-521-77326-1.
  41. ^ Dhume, Sadanand (December 1, 2005). "Indonesian Democracy's Enemy Within". YaleGlobal Online. Archived from the original on December 21, 2015.
  42. ^ "Jordan's Islamic Front rallies Muslims". Retrieved November 3, 2014.
  43. ^ Hamzeh, A. Nizar (1997). "Islamism in Lebanon: A Guide to the Groups". Middle East Quarterly. 4: 47–53.
  44. ^ "Muslim Brotherhood formally launches party". Libya Herald. March 3, 2012. Archived from the original on October 16, 2013. Retrieved March 8, 2012.
  45. ^ Soguel, Dominique (March 4, 2012). "Muslim Brother picked to lead new Libya party". Times of Malta. Agence France-Presse. Retrieved March 8, 2012.
  46. ^ Haimzadeh, Patrick (July 3, 2012). "Libya's Unquiet Election". Middle East Online.
  47. ^ Grant, George (July 1, 2012). "Party Profile: The National Forces Alliance". Libya Herald.
  48. ^ "Perlembagaan". UMNO Online (in Malay). Archived from the original on February 29, 2012. : Goal 3.3 and 3.5
  49. ^ "ISLAM HADHARI: Antara Pemalsuan dan Bid'ah" (PDF). Parti Islam Se Malaysia (PAS). Archived from the original (PDF) on March 11, 2012.
  50. ^ Chen, Cherice (November 25, 2011). "Morocco votes in first election since protests; Islamist party eyes victory". Taiwan News. Retrieved November 25, 2011.
  51. ^ Alami, Aida (November 25, 2011). "Moroccans Vote in Election Marking Shift of Power From King". Bloomberg Businessweek. Archived from the original on June 4, 2013. Retrieved November 25, 2011.
  52. ^ Sly, Liz (May 12, 2012). "Syria's Muslim Brotherhood is gaining influence over anti-Assad revolt". Washington Post.
  53. ^ Oweis, Khaled Yacoub (May 6, 2012). "Syria's Muslim Brotherhood rise from the ashes". Reuters.
  54. ^ "Mountain Rigger". The Economist. November 11, 2006.
  55. ^ "Tunisia legalises Islamist group Ennahda". BBC News Online. March 1, 2011. Retrieved June 24, 2011.
  56. ^ Khalaf, Roula (April 27, 2011). "Tunisian Islamists seek poll majority". Financial Times. Retrieved June 24, 2011.
  57. ^ "Tunisian leader returns from exile". Al Jazeera English. January 20, 2011. Retrieved June 24, 2011.
  58. ^ Kaminski, Matthew (October 26, 2011). "On the Campaign Trail With Islamist Democrats". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved October 26, 2011.
  59. ^ Feldman, Noah (October 30, 2011). "Islamists' Victory in Tunisia a Win for Democracy: Noah Feldman". Bloomberg View. Retrieved October 31, 2011.
  60. ^ ISIE, High and Independent Instance for the Elections. (2011). "Decree of 23 Nov. 2011 about the Final Results of the National Constituent Assembly Elections" (in Arabic). Archived from the original on November 18, 2011.
  61. ^ Lynch, Marc (June 29, 2011). "Tunisia's New al-Nahda". Foreign Policy.
  62. ^ Bay, Austin (November 30, 2011). "Tunisia and its Islamists: The Revolution, Phase Two". RealClearPolitics. Retrieved March 22, 2012.
  63. ^ Totten, Michael (March 21, 2012). "No to America and No to Radical Islam". Archived from the original on March 24, 2012. Retrieved March 22, 2012.
  64. ^ "Objectives Resolution, Republic of Rumi Archived November 7, 2014, at the Wayback Machine
  65. ^ (Revival of Constitution of 1973 Order, 1985 (President's Order No. 14 of 1985))
  66. ^ (with effect from March 2, 1985)
  67. ^ a b "Annex 731 The Objectives Resolution [Article 2(A)]". Retrieved January 16, 2015.
  68. ^ (Eighteenth Amendment) Act, 2010, Section 99 (with effect from April 19, 2010)
  69. ^ [1][dead link]
  70. ^ Abrahamian, Ervand, A History of Modern Iran, Cambridge University Press, 2008, p. 165
  71. ^ Schirazi, Asghar. The Constitution of Iran, p. 212
  72. ^ "Khomeini's REVERSALS of Promises". Retrieved May 4, 2015.
  73. ^ Arjomand, Said Amir (1993). "Shi'ite Jurisprudence and Constitution Making in the Islamic Republic of Iran". In Marty, Martin E.; Appleby, R. Scott (eds.). Fundamentalisms and the State: Remaking Polities, Economies, and Militance. University of Chicago Press. p. 104. ISBN 978-0-226-50884-9.
  74. ^ "President Says Democracy Conforms With Religion in Iran". Tehran Times. August 10, 2002. Archived from the original on March 8, 2007 – via WorldWide Religious News.
  75. ^ "" Official Website of Sayyid Mohammad Khatami "". Archived from the original on October 16, 2007. Retrieved May 4, 2015.
  76. ^ "AbdolKarim Soroush:: عبدالکريم سروش". Retrieved November 3, 2014.
  77. ^ "News". The Office of the Supreme Leader, Sayyid Ali Khamenei. Archived from the original on March 10, 2012.
  78. ^ "Participation in Majlis Elections, Religious and Logical Duty: Leader". Institute for Preserving and Publishing Works by Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenie. December 20, 2003. Archived from the original on September 27, 2007.
  79. ^ "پایگاه اطلاع رسانی دفتر مرجع عالیقدر حضرت آیت الله العظمی مکارم شیرازی". Retrieved May 4, 2015.
  80. ^ انوار الفقاهه- كتاب البيع – ج 1 ص 516
  81. ^ "Envoy: Religious democracy materialized by Islamic Revolution". Irna. Archived from the original on September 29, 2007.
  82. ^ Bakhash, Shaul, The Reign of the Ayatollahs, p.73
  83. ^ "Iranian President Khatami Clashes with Reformist Students at Tehran University". MEMRI TV. June 12, 2004. Archived from the original on February 9, 2005.
  84. ^ The Failure of Political Islam, by Olivier Roy, translated by Carol Volk, Harvard University Press, 1994, pp. 139–140.
  85. ^ "Freedom in the World 2018". January 13, 2018.
  86. ^ "Democracy Index 2019 A year of democratic setbacks and popular protest" (PDF). Economist Intelligence Unit. pp. 10–14. Retrieved April 23, 2020.
  87. ^ "Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan".
  88. ^
  90. ^ "Constitution of the Republic of Turkey".
  91. ^
  92. ^ Guide to Bahrain's politics – 4 Sep 2008. Ambassador Ereli, US Embassy, Bahrain/Wikileaks/The Guardian
  93. ^ "The Tenacity of Hope". The Economist. December 30, 2008. Retrieved October 25, 2014. [The BNP] seems also to have been hurt by its alliance with Islamist parties, the largest of which, Jamaat-e-Islami, was reduced from 17 seats to just two.
  94. ^ "Bangladesh and war crimes: Blighted at birth". The Economist. July 1, 2010. West [Pakistan]'s army had the support of many of East Pakistan's Islamist parties. They included Jamaat-e-Islami, still Bangladesh's largest Islamist party ... reinstating and enforcing that original constitution might amount to an outright ban on Jamaat, the standardbearer in Bangladesh for a conservative strain of Islam.
  95. ^ Islamists Win 75% of Seats in the Egyptian Parliament The New York Times.
  96. ^ Schwarz, Adam (1994). A Nation in Waiting: Indonesia in the 1990s. Allen & Unwin. p. 172. ISBN 0-521-77326-1.
  97. ^ Dhume, Sadanand. (December 1, 2005). Indonesian Democracy’s Enemy Within. Yale Global.
  98. ^ Cite error: The named reference was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  99. ^ Cite error: The named reference was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  100. ^ "Muslim Brotherhood formally launches party". Libya Herald. March 3, 2012. Retrieved March 8, 2012.
  101. ^ Soguel, Dominique (March 3, 2012). "Muslim Brother picked to lead new Libya party". Times of India. Tripoli. Agence France-Presse. Archived from the original on July 1, 2012. Retrieved March 8, 2012.
  102. ^ Beaumont, Peter (December 3, 2011), "Political Islam poised to dominate the new world bequeathed by Arab spring", The Guardian, retrieved January 31, 2012
  103. ^ "Islamists' Growing Sway Raises Questions for Libya". September 15, 2011. Retrieved June 10, 2012.
  104. ^ Spencer, Richard (November 19, 2011), "Libyan cleric announces new party on lines of 'moderate' Islamic democracy", The Telegraph, retrieved January 31, 2012
  105. ^ Cite error: The named reference Haimzadeh was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  106. ^ Grant, George (July 1, 2012), "Party Profile: The National Forces Alliance", Libya Herald
  107. ^ [2] Archived March 11, 2012, at the Wayback Machine
  108. ^ UMNO Online. UMNO's Constitution: Goal 3.5. From:"Archived copy". Archived from the original on February 29, 2012. Retrieved January 5, 2013.CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  109. ^ Cite error: The named reference ReferenceA was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  110. ^ Chen, Cherice (November 25, 2011). "Morocco votes in first election since protests; Islamist party eyes victory". Taiwan News. Retrieved November 25, 2011.
  111. ^ Alami, Aida (November 25, 2011). "Moroccans Vote in Election Marking Shift of Power From King". Bloomberg Businessweek. Archived from the original on November 27, 2011. Retrieved November 25, 2011.
  112. ^ Sidrah Moiz Khan "Pakistan's creation pointless if it fails to become Islamic welfare state" "Imran Khan said on Wednesday that Pakistan’s creation had been pointless if the country fails to become an Islamic welfare state" 27 June 2012.
  113. ^ Marcus Michaelsen "Pakistan's dream catcher" "Iqbal's work has influenced Imran Khan in his deliberations on an "Islamic social state" 27 March 2012.
  114. ^
  115. ^ "Frequently Asked Questions About Hamas". January 6, 2006. Retrieved August 2, 2011.
  116. ^ Syria’s Muslim Brotherhood is gaining influence over anti-Assad revolt By Liz Sly, Washington Post 12 May 2012
  117. ^ Khaled Yacoub Oweis "Syria's Muslim Brotherhood rise from the ashes," Reuters (6 May 2012).
  118. ^ "Syria Muslim Brotherhood Issues Post-Assad State-for-All Commitment Charter," Archived January 17, 2013, at the Wayback Machine (The Muslim Brotherhood’s Official English web site) (7 April 2012).
  119. ^ Cite error: The named reference ReferenceB was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  120. ^ "AKP explains charter changes, slams foreign descriptions". Hürriyet Daily News. Istanbul. March 28, 2010. Retrieved July 21, 2014. In the Western press, when the AK Party administration, the ruling party of the Turkish Republic, is being named, unfortunately most of the time 'Islamic,' 'Islamist,' 'mildly Islamist,' 'Islamic-oriented,' 'Islamic-leaning,' 'Islamic-based' or 'with an Islamic agenda,' and similar language is being used. These characterizations do not reflect the truth, and they sadden us," Çelik said. "Yes, the AK Party is a conservative democratic party. The AK Party's conservatism is limited to moral and social issues.


  • Mahmoud Sadri and Ahmad Sadri (eds.) 2002 Reason, Freedom, and Democracy in Islam: Essential Writings of Abdolkarim Soroush, Oxford University Press
  • Omid Safi (ed.) 2003 Progressive Muslims: On Justice, Gender and Pluralism, Oneworld
  • Azzam S. Tamimi 2001 Rachid Ghannouchi: A Democrat within Islamism, Oxford University Press
  • Khan L. Ali 2003 A Theory of Universal Democracy, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers
  • Khatab, Sayed & G.Bouma, Democracy in Islam, Routledge 2007

External linksEdit