User talk:Numerounovedant/Archive 3

Kalki Koechlin scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the Kalki Koechlin article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 10 January 2017. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/January 10, 2017. Thanks! Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 12:45, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

@Mike Christie: Thank you, it looks good to me. NumerounovedantTalk 10:11, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Kaash (2015 film) copyright problem

Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 18:20, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

@Diannaa: Thanks for the little piece of information. NumerounovedantTalk 10:10, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Happy New Year 2017!

To you and yours! May you have a happy, prosperous and joyous one! God bless!  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 12:45, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

@Ssven2: Back at you, sir. NumerounovedantTalk 10:12, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Reference errors on 5 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Kalki Koechlin page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:15, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiCup

Hi! Am not sure if you have notice it or not, but the annual editing competition Wikipedia:WikiCup has started and the signup is open till 5 February 2017. The cup encourages content improvement and tries to make editing on Wikipedia more fun; and it did that for me last year. I have hence decided to drop this friendly note hoping that you would take part. Although the signup ends on 5th Feb, the earlier you sign in the earlier you start scoring. Happy New Year and Happy Editing! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:53, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

@Dharmadhyaksha: Thank you for the notification. NumerounovedantTalk 06:26, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

FAC

Hey! How are you? I saw your comments on my FAC and I really appreciate your concern about the article. I just want to inform you (in case you didn't read above resolved comments there) that its very hard to find sources for a 2004 or any pre-2010s Bollywood film unless it is a Mughae-e-Azam, Sholay, DDLJ or say "pop culture Indian hits". I really appreciate your oppose and I will try to resolve your comments. I would like to inform you that there are no information available for its filming, pre or post production and other stuff.....well, I will still try my best. In case you don't know, checkout my other articles: Mary Kom, Kaminey and others to know about "How much I can write if sources are available!". And, please check Kalidas (film) (an FA), which has a size similar to my article and it also has no filming schedule info and stuff. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krish! (talk • contribs)

Thanks for your edits. I really appreciate your efforts. I have made few changes to avoid confusion as initially three reviews were placed at very confusing places. By the way, Do you have any idea to expand the production section by four or five lines? Once again thanks for your inputs, it really made the article look better.Krish | Talk 18:13, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

@Krish!: Yeah quite a few details could be added, i'll put up the comments at the FAC, and make some minor changes myself. NumerounovedantTalk 04:03, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Did you know what the directors really meant by saying "reverse" about Bryant case? Well they meant "power". In the film the sexual harassment case is filed by the "powerful" (the boss) and the accused is a normal employee. In real life, it was a fan (not powerful) and the accused was very powerful (the famous player). They wanted to showcase how money and power can change the same scenerio. I had seen their interview somewhere, and since the given article doesn't specify this, I thought it was better to remove.Krish | Talk 10:25, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

The Kapil Sharma Show

OK, now I agree that the article is not meeting GA criteria currently. Is the article meeting B grade criteria. If yes, please rate it! If no, then please rate it as C class because the article is meeting at least C class criteria. I want the article to be assessed at any class criteria. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️✍⋡ 08:39, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Done. NumerounovedantTalk 10:27, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

One more: Aaj Ki Raat Hai Zindagi. Please, it's a kind request to rate it. This one is also the same length as that of The Kapil Sharma Show. So a C class rating will be appreciated. Thanks in advance. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️✍⋡ 06:57, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Dear Zindagi

I've nominated the article for GA. This one is in good shape than The Kapil Sharma Show. Hope you would review it. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️✍⋡ 09:04, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

@Mr. Smart LION: I went through the article briefly. The bits that are required are there, however IMO the article needs a thorough copy-edit as the language is too casual in parts. It also has grammar issues and will greatly benefit from a c.e., so you may put it up for one at the WP:GOCE. I will be happy to review it after the c.e. NumerounovedantTalk 10:19, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

The article is already copy-edited. Check the article's revision history and its talk page. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️✍⋡ 06:58, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

@Mr. Smart LION: Hmm, that's a little strange because I do find the prose to be weak and lacking in parts. Anyway, right now it will be a little difficult for me to get to this one, but I might find some time in a week or so? NumerounovedantTalk 11:11, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

OK, I'll fix the issues once you start the GA page for the article. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️✍⋡ 12:59, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Kalki Koechlin

Hey, congrats on her main page appearance tomorrow. She and Hrithik Roshan share same birthday (same day but not year) and I've nominated the latter for GA. Interested in reviewing? - FrB.TG (talk) 11:47, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

@FrB.TG: Thank you, that's a fun fact! XD And as a matter of fact, I did go through Roshan's article on seeing your nomination. I was hesitant because of its size and my time restrictions on Wikipedia, but I might just review it after all. NumerounovedantTalk 12:47, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

That is okay. I don't have the patience of waiting for someone pick it up from GAN (I rarely nominate an article). Perhaps your friend, @Aoba47: could review it. I think he is a nice reviewer and seems to be an avid GA reviewer, though I am not sure of how much interest Bollywood is to him. - FrB.TG (talk) 17:22, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Oh yes I could talk at lengths about his humility, and yes he would never say no to a review if you were to ask. XD However, I already feel awful for making him review a rather under prepared article, so I think the least I can do is take one for him. I'll pick up the review for Roshan's article and he can share his views and suggestions. NumerounovedantTalk 17:33, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Nice to see her on the Main page today, thank you! - Would you hae time for looking at a FAC, peace and joy?

Thanks for the help with Koechlin's article, couldn't have happened without you! As for the FAC, I am not sure if I can be of any help there because of my unfamiliarity with the topic itself. I think I might be a little out of depth here and would not be able to offer much constructive feedback. NumerounovedantTalk 11:17, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nil Battey Sannata

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nil Battey Sannata you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dharmadhyaksha -- Dharmadhyaksha (talk) 12:01, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of How to Save a Life (Grey's Anatomy)

The article How to Save a Life (Grey's Anatomy) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:How to Save a Life (Grey's Anatomy) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk) 17:41, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Andha Naal

Hi, I intend to take it to FAC. Before that, I had opened a peer review which I now intend to close as it's been open for long. Would you be interested in posting comments? I'll close the PR after they're resolved. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:20, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

I remember going through the article briefly a couple of days ago, and it seemed fairly well written. I already have a couple of things going on here, but I will surely try to get around to the PR. Maybe later today, if not I'll let you know otherwise. NumerounovedantTalk 11:09, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

That's all the comments regarding Waiting from me. You said you'd do some c/e work in Andha Naal, you still up to it? I always prefer quid pro quo. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:54, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

@Kailash29792:Yes I might get to it later this evening, thanks for your comments on Waiting. Also, if you get a chance you must watch the film, it's really one of the finer films that came out of Bollywood last year. NumerounovedantTalk 10:03, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for those edits on Andha Naal. So have your comments been resolved? If yes, please say so on the PR page before I close it and nominate the article for FA. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:46, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

How to Save a Life

Hello: I had a look at the plot section as requested and have made a few minor changes to it. I have not seen this episode so cannot be of any help with plot details, but I hope the c/e makes it flow better and is what you were looking for. Regards. Twofingered Typist (talk) 16:29, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

@Twofingered Typist: Yes exactly, thanks a lot! NumerounovedantTalk 15:34, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The GA Reviewer Barnstar
	This is for reviewing Hrithik Roshan for GA that improved it greatly. Thank you! - FrB.TG (talk) 15:28, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

@FrB.TG: Good job with the article, Cheers! NumerounovedantTalk 18:48, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi, Hrithik Roshan is at FAC, should you wish to critique further. – FrB.TG (talk) 18:36, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nil Battey Sannata

The article Nil Battey Sannata you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Nil Battey Sannata for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Dharmadhyaksha -- Dharmadhyaksha (talk) 05:41, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Waiting (2015 film)

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Waiting has been completed.

I archived the URL for citation #3 at https://archive.org/web/ . It would certainly be worthwhile to archive the articles remaining citations (if allowed) when you have time.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 19:23, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

March 2017 WikiCup newsletter

And so ends the first round of the competition, with 4 points required to qualify for round 2. It would have been 5 points, but when a late entrant was permitted to join the contest in February, a promise was made that his inclusion would not result in the exclusion of any other competitor. To achieve this, the six entrants that had the lowest positive score of 4 points have been added to the 64 people who otherwise would have qualified. As a result, some of the groups have nine contestants rather than eight. Our top four scorers in round 1 were:

• Cas Liber, last year's winner, led the field with two featured articles on birds and a total score of 674.
• Iry-Hor, a WikiCup newcomer, came next with a featured article, a good article and a tally of 282 bonus points for a score of 517. All these points came from the article Nyuserre Ini, an Ancient Egyptian pharaoh,
• 1989, another WikiCup newcomer, was in joint third place at 240. 1989 has claimed points for two featured lists and one good article relating to anime and comedy series, all of which were awarded bonus points.
• Peacemaker67 shared third place with five good articles and thirteen good article reviews, mostly on naval vessels. He is also new to the competition.

The largest number of DYKs have been submitted by Vivvt and The C of E, who each claimed for seven, and MBlaze Lightning achieved eight articles at ITN. Carbrera and Peacemaker67 each claimed for five GAs and Krishna Chaitanya Velaga was well out in front for GARs, having reviewed 32. No featured pictures, featured topics or good topics yet, but we have achieved three featured articles and a splendid total of fifty good articles.

So, on to the second round. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 13:52, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For Nil Battey Sannata's GA success. Well done! Pavanjandhyala 15:30, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

FLC request

Hi. I am not sure if the topic interests you but I would appreciate if you could find some time reviewing the FLC nom for List of Sahitya Akademi fellows here. - Vivvt (Talk) 05:12, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

@Vivvt:I'll take a look soon. NumerounovedantTalk 19:39, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Never mind. I have withdrawn the nomination. Will reach out to you for the next time. - Vivvt (Talk) 04:03, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

@Vivvt: Sure thing. NumerounovedantTalk 11:39, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Ben Affleck

Hello, you offered suggestions on Ben Affleck's article last year as part of a Good Article nomination and a Peer Review. I wondered if you would please look at the article again and share your thoughts? In preparation for another GA nomination, I've been working on your suggestions.

I've fixed the issues with bare and dead links. I cut way down on the quotes from Ben's significant others, and trimmed the Eastern Congo Initiative significantly, moving much of the content to the organisation's own article. Popeye191 (talk) 16:22, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

@Popeye191: It's a long article and I am not as active as I want to be on Wikipedia at the moment, so it might be a long review. If that's not an issue than sure I'll take a look. NumerounovedantTalk 11:38, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Any feedback at all would be helpful, thanks Popeye191 (talk) 12:07, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

@Popeye191: Well, I have a busy couple of days; meanwhile I will wait for another reviewer to the pick up article and if nobody does that by the next week then I'll do it myself. NumerounovedantTalk 06:10, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks again for all you feedback on this article. I've submitted it for peer review now Popeye191 (talk) 07:27, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

FAC

Would you please take a look here. Thanks.Krish | Talk 13:53, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

@Krish!: Sure, I'll take a look tomorrow, meanwhile, can you help with this? NumerounovedantTalk 14:32, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Yes, I will tonight.Krish | Talk 08:26, 26 March 2017 (UTC)

Hey! I have tweaked the further sections, you should look at it. I would like to tell you that the article considerably changes during a c/e by GOCE, which means the unfamiliar editor sometimes misinterpret the sentences and they often re-write then differently. Sometimes, small mistakes are invisible to the eyes and that is why FACs are held. I would be glad if you could continue the review or give a c/e yourself. Your review has definitely helped the article. Thanks.Krish | Talk 11:36, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

@Krish!: Yes I understand, and I would go through the article and be happy to offer minor tweaks wherever necessary. Will do it by tonight. NumerounovedantTalk 12:18, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Waiting

This from Jagran Film Festival's official website might help. ** Pavan Jandhyala ** 03:16, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

@Pavanjandhyala: Thanks Pavan, I'll go through it. Also, can you consider taking a second look here and help me with these comments? I really don't want the article to be stuck in the storm. Thanks again. NumerounovedantTalk 07:49, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

If you don't intend to support, just cap those comments as resolved and move on. Nothing will happen to the article. Once the nominator has completed addressing our comments, the task is done. Supporting is not mandatory. Warring would only make the miserable feel awful. ** Pavan Jandhyala ** 12:07, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice Pavan. NumerounovedantTalk 12:19, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Kalidas

Although this article passed FA, it was later revealed that two of the sources extensively used in the article were mirror publications: books that cannot be used on Wiki, no matter how much they copy from us. As a result, I had to rework the article to a great extent, and now I've listed it for WP:FAR. Please post comments if necessary. --Kailash29792 (talk) 12:19, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Will do. NumerounovedantTalk 13:04, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Request for help (Liz Sanbourne)

Hello again. Thank you for your help with my Simone Russell FAC; I greatly appreciate your commentary/feedback as it can be somewhat cringey to look back at one of the first articles that I worked on. I am currently revising the second article that I ever worked on after joining Wikipedia (Liz Sanbourne), and I was wondering if you could look through it and provide some copyedits and/or comments about it. I strongly believe that I have exhausted all of the possible resources about this character, and I have been playing around with the idea of putting it up for FAC, but I would greatly appreciate your feedback. If I do put this up for FAC, this would be my last FAC for an article in this topic, as the last GA remaining is too far off for any considerations in FAC and I would like to take a break from working on articles relating to this show. Thank you either way! Aoba47 (talk) 19:40, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

@Aoba47: Of course, I'll take a look at it soon. NumerounovedantTalk 08:21, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

• Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 12:01, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

@Aoba47: Where do you want me put the comments? I don't think editing directly without clarifying is feasible here, owing to my lack of knowledge on the topic. NumerounovedantTalk 15:18, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

• Thank you again for your help; you can put the comments in the talk page. I apologize for the inconvenience. Hope you are having a wonderful start to your week so far. Aoba47 (talk) 15:21, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Alright, will do. And you can stop thanking me, it's a delight to read some of those articles. You put in so much heart into them, and it shows. NumerounovedantTalk 15:29, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Thank you, and it is always helpful to hear feedback in order to get better. Let me know if you need any help with any of projects as you have been helping me a lot lately so I want to make sure that I can do something for you as well. Aoba47 (talk) 16:25, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

@Aoba47: I will, thanks for the comments at Waiting's FAC. I do have a question for you, is there a specific reason why you chose the phrasing "X is a fictional character on the series Y" instead of using "from"? I mean there is nothing wrong with the phrasing, but it somehow gives me the idea that the character is still "on" the show, even if the character?series in no longer on air. It really is nothing, but I thought that I might as well ask. NumerounovedantTalk 19:10, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

That is a really good point; I actually never thought about it really. I think (to the best of my recollections) that I most likely copied the format from either a FA or GA on a fictional character. I have checked and the FA on Pauline Fowler uses "from" rather than "on". I agree with your logic, and I have altered this in the article. Aoba47 (talk) 19:20, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

@Aoba47: I hope the edits were helpful, even though there wasn't much to do because the article was already in a really good shape. Let me know if I can help more with it or anything at all. NumerounovedantTalk 20:22, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

• Your edits were very helpful and improved the article a great deal. Thank you for your help! Aoba47 (talk) 20:26, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

• I apologize for all the trouble. I was wondering if you could also look over the Vincent Clarkson article too as I did some revisions to that and I would greatly appreciate a fresh pair of eyes on it. Aoba47 (talk) 02:53, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

@Aoba47: I went through the article yesterday, while working on Liz's article. Will take a more thorough look and get back to you, maybe by tomorrow. NumerounovedantTalk 18:43, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

• Thank you; I greatly appreciate it! Aoba47 (talk) 18:45, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Need help and guidness

Hey Numerounovedant, how are you?? I want to discuss something with you about Vidya Balan's article on Wikipedia. Since you're a senior editor, so I think that I would be good to seek help and guidness from you.

There is an article on Wikipedia about "List of Hindi film clans". This article also features the "Roy Kapur family" clan. Vidya Balan is married to Siddharth Roy Kapur, so that means that Roy Kapur family is also Vidya Balan's family and the members of the family are her in-laws. And everyone knows that In-laws are relatives. So I replaced this "|relatives = Priyamani (second cousin)" with this "|relatives = See Roy Kapur family" on her info-box section ("List of Hindi film clans#Roy Kapur family" also has name of Priyamani) but a user whose name is "Krimuk2.0" reverted my edits with these reasons "Her in-laws aren't her relatives, but her husband's" and "In-laws are what they are, not relatives. also, stop using personal attacks unless you wish to be blocked". Now you tell me what should I do. I know that I am right, In-laws are family members, but he reverted my edits twice with lame excuses. Now I need your help please guide me that what should I do now?? Leave a message on my talk-page. It would be so kind of you. Thank you. Many Words (talk) 16:48, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

@Many Words: Sorry, somehow I completely read over it. As for your concenrs I believe that the Roy-Kapoor does not warrant a prominent mention as they are not immediate family. I am sure that the article mentions her relationship with them in the appropriate section. NumerounovedantTalk 06:39, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Congratulations! for bringing Waiting to the FA status. And, sorry for forgetting to comment on the FAC. Krish | Talk 13:35, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Congrats! Sorry I wasn't of much help except for making an edit (to the article) or two. – FrB.TG (talk) 19:25, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

@Krish!: @FrB.TG: Thank you guys, and don't worry, there's always going to be more stuff that I'll need help with. XD NumerounovedantTalk 04:06, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Vedant, would you like to perform the source review on Mary Kom? I know I didn't even review your article but if you don't have any problem with it. I have always appreciated your efforts and always will.Krish | Talk 06:14, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Alright, but it might be a day or two before I start​. NumerounovedantTalk 06:28, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Congratulations on your success, keep up the good work. Yashthepunisher (talk) 07:14, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

@Yashthepunisher: Thank you sir. NumerounovedantTalk 12:35, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Arre bas karo bhai, bacche ki jaan loge kya! :) We are almost the same age. Yashthepunisher (talk) 17:18, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

@Yashthepunisher: Hahaha. XD Arre, I don't go around addressing just about anyone as sir. It's exclusively for the people that I come to respect, join the club sir! NumerounovedantTalk 06:30, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Well I'm flattered. Thanks again! Yashthepunisher (talk) 16:15, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

I'm a little late here, but many congratulations, Vedant! :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 16:10, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

@Krimuk2.0: Thank you! NumerounovedantTalk 16:24, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Are you working on the lovely Ms Knightley's article next? Krimuk2.0 (talk) 16:36, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

@Krimuk2.0:Yes, I had a couple of artists in mind including James Franco, Julia Stiles and Knightley. I've decided to give her a try first. NumerounovedantTalk 16:51, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Awesome! Good luck. :) Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:37, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

FAC Request

Hello again! I hope that you are having a wonderful weekend so far. I was wondering if you could possible help me with my current FAC? I understand if you do not have the time. I would greatly appreciate your help, especially after all of the help that you have provided in my last FAC. Also, leet me know if there is anything that I can do to help you with any of your projects on here. Thank you in advance! Aoba47 (talk) 23:46, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Sure, I'll take a look soon. I might need some help later with Hannah Baker, but currently I am going very slow. NumerounovedantTalk 04:08, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

I will the first to comment there. LOLKrish | Talk 07:22, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Sounds good to me; I will be more than happy to help out with Hannah Baker in the future. Aoba47 (talk) 09:18, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

@Krish!: Hahaha thanks. NumerounovedantTalk 12:34, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Did you forget?Krish | Talk 05:26, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

No I didn't, I'll get to it later today. NumerounovedantTalk 06:32, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

• Hi. When you get the chance, could you review Naruto for FA? 1989 22:55, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

I'll take a look soon. NumerounovedantTalk 13:44, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hannah Baker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vanity Fair. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

Keira Knightley filmography

This list looks a bit fork-y to me. You should have discussed before creating it separately. I'm witnessing a lot of such lists on WP. Don't mind, just expressing myself. Yashthepunisher (talk) 19:36, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

@Yashthepunisher: No, I totally understand, I should've asked. That's part of the reason why I mentioned "for now" in the edit summary. This was a redirect anyway, we can go back to how it was in no time. How do you feel about it? I mean how do you want to go with this? NumerounovedantTalk 19:52, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

I think we should abstain ourselves from creating such unnecessary lists. It should be restored. Yashthepunisher (talk) 11:14, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

I'll do that. NumerounovedantTalk 11:47, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Miss Malini

As discussed on my talk page, I think it's great if you conduct the GA review. But the GOCE editing shall be finished first. Before that, there are two sentences I think I could use your help in paraphrasing:

• The book 40 Retakes: Bollywood Classics You May Have Missed says, My father was also the editor of the famous Tamil weekly magazine, Ananda Vikatan, and a close friend of R.K. Narayan from Mysore. During their discussions, a nice screenplay full of satire and humour came up with the help of Narayan. Immediately, my father launched the Tamil movie called Miss Malini, with Kothamangalam Subbu, a satirist himself and a lyricist in the role that Motilal played in the Hindi version. I've already written "Soon after the screenplay developed, Narayan's friend, Gemini Studios owner S. S. Vasan launched the film", but I think it can be further expanded.
• This source does not explicitly appear to state that Miss Malini was Narayan's only film screenplay. The interviewer Randor Guy asks Narayan's brother Ramachandran if he wrote for any other film, to which he replies, "He wrote a story for Jupiter Pictures, Coimbatore, but it was never produced" and "Many writers worked on Avvaiyar and Narayan was one among them. But, I have no idea how much of his work Vasan used." According to Guy, Narayan wrote a treatment for Moondru Pillaigal, but that's far as it went. So is it safe to say (using this source) that Miss Malini was the only screenplay written by Narayan for a released film? --Kailash29792 (talk) 05:52, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

@Kailash29792: Hey, here's what i feel-

• The quote regarding the screenplay seems a little vague to me in the context that an entire screenplay came up during"discussions". I think that the quote doesn't really give away much, were they planned discussions? Casual conversations? A little bit of both? I mean the whole context changes with these possibilities, if you can dig up just a little more about the "discussions", I am sure we can be more explicit about the piece. If not, we can still expand upon the "satire and humour" bit.
• Also, yes I believe that as long as you say "for a released film", the source can be used to substantiate the Narayan's screenplay claim. However, this might read as irrelevant to some, but a quick and crisp mention of the fact that Narayan did write for films (irrespective of the script's fate), would not hurt either.

I hope that my comments help. NumerounovedantTalk 09:48, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Partially  Done. I've added a footnote explaining Narayan's other contributions to cinema, but I'll discuss the screenplay/discussions part with others before expanding it. --Kailash29792 (talk) 11:10, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Alright, let me know if I can be of any more help. NumerounovedantTalk 19:19, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

May 2017 WikiCup newsletter

The second round of the competition has now closed, with just under 100 points being required to qualify for round 3. YellowEvan just scraped into the next round with 98 points but we have to say goodbye to the thirty or so competitors who didn't achieve this threshold; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. Our top scorers in round 2 were:

• Cas Liber, led the field with five featured articles, four on birds and one on astronomy, and a total score of 2049, half of which came from bonus points.
• 1989 was in second place with 826 points, 466 of which were bonus points. 1989 has claimed points mostly relating to anime and Japanese-related articles.
• Peacemaker67 took third place with two FAs, one GA and seven GARs, mostly on naval vessels or military personnel, scoring 543 points.
• Other contestants who scored over 400 points were Freikorp, Carbrera, and Czar. Of course all these points are now wiped out and the 32 remaining contestants start again from zero in round 3.

Vivvt submitted the largest number of DYKs (30), and MBlaze Lightning achieved 13 articles at ITN. Carbrera claimed for 11 GAs and Argento Surfer performed the most GARs, having reviewed 11. So far we have achieved 38 featured articles and a splendid 132 good articles. Commendably, 279 GARs have been achieved so far, more than double the number of GAs.

So, on to the third round. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 13:16, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Keira Knightley, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pride and Prejudice (film) and Ted Elliott. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Waiting (2015 film) scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the Waiting (2015 film) article has been scheduled as today's featured article for May 27, 2017. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/May 27, 2017, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1100 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:33, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

It looks good to me, thank you. NumerounovedantTalk 13:55, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for the article! - I have a FAC open. Best wishes for exams! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:01, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Never mind, I try to forget the FAC --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:27, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

@Gerda Arendt: I see that the article went through a lot of traffic at the FAC. Best wishes for the next one. NumerounovedantTalk 13:08, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Sara Ramirez

Can you help me by addinf a cropped version of this, one suitable to fit in the body of the article? Callietorres (talk) 15:17, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

@Callietorres: I hope it looks good to you. NumerounovedantTalk 16:00, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Yes, thank you. Callietorres (talk) 16:03, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ellen Pompeo

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ellen Pompeo you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk) 18:40, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

FLC

I would appreciate your help here.Krish | Talk 07:58, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Sure, meanwhile will you take a look at Nil Battey Sannata's FAC? NumerounovedantTalk 08:07, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ellen Pompeo

The article Ellen Pompeo you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ellen Pompeo for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk) 14:21, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

FAC

Hello again! I hope that everything is going well for you. If possible, I would greatly appreciate it if you could provide any feedback/commentary on my current FAC. I understand that it is a busy time of the year so I completely understand if you do not have the time or energy to look at this nomination. Thank you either. Great work with your current FAC; have a wonderful rest of your day. Aoba47 (talk) 20:30, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

I'll take a look soon. NumerounovedantTalk 08:01, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

• Thank you. Take as much time as you need as it will be up there for a while. Aoba47 (talk) 14:30, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ashwiny Iyer Tiwari

added a link pointing to Femina (magazine)

Jwala Gutta

added a link pointing to Chetan Anand

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Kalidas (film)

The article is undergoing a FAR here. Please provide comments before it is closed. Thank you.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 09:02, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Actually, he already commented. --Kailash29792 (talk) 09:04, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

He still has to come back to you on it (aka "Will go through the entire article as a whole again").  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 09:17, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for the ping, but I was hoping for some more people to go through it before i commented again just to avoid being redundant. NumerounovedantTalk 10:26, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Prateik Babbar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bengali film. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

List of accolades received by Madras (film)

Hello Numerounovedant, how's everything with you? My fourth attempt at a film accolades list for FLC. I have nominated the list here. Feel free to leave comments.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 09:33, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

I'll go through it by the end of the week. NumerounovedantTalk 16:28, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

FL

I have nominated the list here. I have worked the hardest here. Please do look at it.Krish | Talk 15:44, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Travelling

I'm travelling till Monday morning. I hope someone else will address all the remaining comments at Miss Malini. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:11, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Well, I do have an exam lined up next week and I am not in a hurry if you're not. Take your time and I'll try to get through the rest of review too by the end of the week. NumerounovedantTalk 17:28, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Loev (film)

The article Loev (film) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Loev (film) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk) 17:41, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

The WikiCup

As a WikiCup judge, I have rejected three of your submissions for the WikiCup because they were made too late. The relevant rule states "contestants have 10 days to nominate their work after promotion (for good and featured content), appearance on the main page (for did you knows and in the news articles) or the completion of good article reviews. Work submitted after this time is no longer eligible." In this case it was 21, 18 and 26 days. In fact, Ellen Pompeo would not have been eligible in any event because you had not done significant work on the article during the course of the competition (ie during 2017) before the GA review. Sorry about that. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:43, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

• Numerounovedant (submissions) claimed Ellen Pompeo as a Good Article with a 2.4-times multiplier
• Numerounovedant (submissions) claimed Talk:Sévérine/GA1 as a Good Article Review
• Numerounovedant (submissions) claimed Talk:Sara Ramirez/GA1 as a Good Article Review

Thank you for the heads up, that's all right. Sorry for the confusion NumerounovedantTalk 15:52, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Peer review/M. G. Ramachandran filmography/archive1

I have opened up a PR for my next future attempt at FLC. Please feel free to leave comments there. Thanks.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 10:45, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

I'll drop by soon Ssven2. NumerounovedantTalk 19:53, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

A gentle reminder.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 08:26, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

@Ssven2: I just got back from a long week of travel, will try and get to this tonight. NumerounovedantTalk 09:56, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Source review

Can you perform the source review here? I would appreciate it.Krish | Talk 14:26, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

I am sorry Krish, I am already cranky from having handled the sources at my FAC, and another article. I don't think I'll be up for any more source related tasks anytime soon. NumerounovedantTalk 19:52, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

I can understand but can you that for this list? It only has like 10 sources and all well-known. Thanks!Krish | Talk 12:41, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Krish aren't they more like 70? NumerounovedantTalk 09:57, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Well it does have 70 sources but out of which around 50 is from one publisher TV by the Numbers. Rest are from Variety, Deadline, The Hollywood Reporter etc. Each and every source is notable, you just have to post there. It requires just a glance.Krish | Talk 13:36, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup 2017 July newsletter

The third round of the competition has finished in a flurry of last minute activity, with 288 points being required to qualify for round 4. It was a hotly competitive round with all but four of the contestants exceeding the 106 points that was necessary to proceed to round 4 last year. Coemgenus and Freikorp tied on 288, and both have been allowed to proceed, so round 4 now has one pool of eight competitors and one of nine.

Round 3 saw the achievement of a 26-topic Featured topic by MPJ-DK as well as 5 featured lists and 13 featured articles. PanagiotisZois and SounderBruce achieved their first ever featured articles. Carbrera led the GA score with 10, Tachs achieved 17 DYKs and MBlaze Lightning 10 In the news items. There were 167 DYKs, 93 GARs and 82 GAs overall, this last figure being higher than the number of GAs in round 2, when twice as many people were taking part. Even though contestants performed more GARs than they achieved GAs, there was still some frustration at the length of time taken to get articles reviewed.

As we start round 4, we say goodbye to the fifteen or so competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them (some people have fallen foul of this rule and the points have been removed).

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 05:37, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

A year ago ...

Indian sports and film
... you were recipient no. 1420 of Precious, a prize of QAI!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:12, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

What a lovely thing to remember, thank you Gerda. NumerounovedantTalk 09:20, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

My memory is rather lousy, but I keep a good list (follow the link) of inspiration: so many things to be thankful for! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:24, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

List of accolades received by Vishwaroopam

My sixth attempt at a film accolades list for FLC, Vedant. I have nominated the list here. Feel free to leave comments.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 08:14, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Will do Ssven2. Also, could you possibly do a source review for Loev?. Thanks​ either way. NumerounovedantTalk 13:47, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

I am taking a break from reviewing (including source reviews). So, I am afraid I'll have to decline the offer. Really sorry. No offense intended.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 17:13, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

GA

Would you like to review Alex Parrish? I know she is no Hannah Baker but still. I would appreciate your help.Krish | Talk 06:39, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

Hahaha, alright Krish. Let me know once you nominate it. NumerounovedantTalk 07:24, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

It's here.Krish | Talk 10:28, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

I am a little pre-occupied in RL Krish, will take a look soon (maybe by the end of the month)? NumerounovedantTalk 17:08, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

I will be leaving this site after Monday for a whole year.Krish | Talk 20:09, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Dude, its already the end of the month.Krish | Talk 15:10, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Well, to be fair, you were going to leave and I really didn't check if you were around. But, now that I know, here you go. NumerounovedantTalk 16:52, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

It's been 10 days yet you still haven't replied back. I will be leaving wikipedia next week so please hurry!Krish | Talk 14:10, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Nadodi Mannan

Hello, Vedant. How's everything with you? The 1958 Tamil film Nadodi Mannan is my next attempt at GA. It's nominated for GAN here. Do let me know if you are interested or not in reviewing the article by pinging me. Thanks.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 07:54, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

I am a little pre-occupied in RL Ssven2, will take a look soon (maybe by the end of the month)? NumerounovedantTalk 17:07, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Sure thing. No problem. Hope everything turns out alright for you.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 07:29, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Nani filmography/archive1

This is my fourth attempt at a featured list. Feel free to leave comments if any. :) Pavanjandhyala (talk) 18:33, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

I am a little pre-occupied in RL Pavan, will take a look soon (maybe by the end of the month)? NumerounovedantTalk 17:07, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

No issues. Take your time. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 08:24, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Loev FAC

Very sorry to hear about the outcome of the FAC. Although Ceranthor may have been right in most of his comments, did you think any of them was based on the article's factual accuracy? Because sometimes I feel that, regardless of the prose, it is the article's FA (factual accuracy, not this one) that matters. --Kailash29792 (talk) 04:31, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Ugh not really, honestly Kailash, it was an awfully difficult plot to write because of all the undertones and connotations attached to it. I've had to change it so many times that I am not even sure if that actually is true to what the film portrayed. As for the production section, I am sure you're familiar with how difficult it is to look up sources for independent films in India. I think I might have invested too much into it, and after almost 300 edits I think it came down to redundant reading. I just didn't feel up for actually having to go through it again. It looks mostly​ fine to me as it stands. The review, on the other hand, I believe could have gone better had the reviewer just put in/removed the commas/articles (which were his major concerns from what i draw) instead of having listed them. I would have been easier for both sides, as there was absolutely no part that was well substantiated. I am not as active here as I used to be, and crazy time has gone by since I began with this one. NumerounovedantTalk 05:07, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi Numerounovedant, I just wanted to clarify something about this FAC. I opposed per section 1a of the featured article criteria. Featured articles must represent the best of Wikipedia, and that means they have to be professionally written, which I do not think is true for the Loev article as it currently stands (though it is well-written). Also, it's not true that my major concerns were comma usage; in fact, just four were. I'm sorry that you found my review frustrating, but at the end of the day you nominated the article to get feedback, and I provided extremely specific and detailed suggestions to try and give you an idea of some methods for improving the article to an FA standard. I hope you continue working on this article, as I think it's engaging and well-written, and could reach FA with some hard work and determination. Best of luck with everything, ceranthor 19:33, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

@Ceranthor: I do appreciate the time that put into offering the comments, it was just long overdrawn FAC. Thanks for the feedback. NumerounovedantTalk 16:47, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Hi, Vedant. I am sorry that it had to turn out this way. I hope that this does not discourage you from producing more articles for the encyclopedia and perhaps renominating the article sometime later; of course there is much more to an article than a bronze star. You did a wonderful work with Loev. Good luck with your future endeavor. – FrB.TG (talk) 21:05, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Of course not, FrB.TG. It can frustrating during an FAC, waiting forr comments, and honestly after fourty days the thought of a source review still to come with the rest of it wasn't​ particularly exciting. I'd rather work on a new article, and there are a lot of things that I still want on work on here. Thanks for looking out, sir. I appreciate it. NumerounovedantTalk 16:47, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Request for help with FAC

Hello again! I hope that everything is going well for you. If possible, I would greatly appreciate it if you could provide any feedback/commentary on my current FAC. I understand that it is a busy time of the year so I completely understand if you do not have the time or energy to look at this nomination. Thank you either way. Good luck with your current projects; have a wonderful rest of your week. Aoba47 (talk) 16:53, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Hey Aoba47, long time (sort of)! I hope everything well with you as well. I've been really busy in RL, but I'll definitely take a look as soon as I find some spare time. NumerounovedantTalk 16:25, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

• Thank you for your response, and I hope that everything is going well for you in RL. Aoba47 (talk) 16:43, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup 2017 September newsletter

Round 4 of the WikiCup has ended and we move forward into the final round. In round 4, a total of 12 FAs, 3 FLs, 44 GAs, 3 FLs, 79 DYKs, 1 ITN and 42 GARs was achieved, with no FPs or FTs this time. Congratulations to Peacemaker67 on the Royal Yugoslav Navy Good Topic of 36 items, and the 12 featured articles achieved by Cas Liber (5), Vanamonde93 (3), Peacemaker67 (2), Adityavagarwal (1) and 12george1 (1). With a FA scoring 200 points, and bonus points available on top of this, FAs are likely to feature heavily in the final round. Meanwhile Yellow Evan, a typhoon specialist, was contributing 12 DYKs and 10 GAs, while Adityavagarwal and Freikorp topped the GAR list with 8 reviews each. As we enter the final round, we are down to eight contestants, and we would like to thank those of you who have been eliminated for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. The lowest score needed to reach round 5 was 305, and I think we can expect a highly competitive final round.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck, and let the best man (or woman) win! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 06:25, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

WikiProject Women in Red/The World Contest

Hi. Thankyou for your participation in the challenge series or/and contests. In November The Women in Red World Contest is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There will be over $4000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. If this would appeal to you and you think you'd be interested in contributing new articles on Indian actresses or whatever during this month please sign up in the participants section. The articles done may also count towards the ongoing challenge. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate and raise money to buy books about women for others to use, this is also fine. Help would also be appreciated in drawing up the lists of missing articles. If you think of any missing articles please add them to the Indian list in the sub page on Asia at Missing articles. Thankyou, and if taking part, good luck!♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:12, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Kaththi/archive1

I would appreciate your comments as always, Vedant.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 08:46, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/M. G. Ramachandran filmography/archive1

I have nominated this list which you have peer reviewed for FLC. I really would appreciate your comments there, Vedant.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 13:06, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

@Ssven2: Still trying to find my way back here. I'll try and start with this, and also try to the one before this. NumerounovedantTalk 13:57, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

No problem.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 15:15, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

GA Review

Would you like to review Gunday? I would appreciate your gesture.Krish | Talk 19:05, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

You can at least reply. Don't you think?Krish | Talk 09:40, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

I am sorry, I somehow completely read over this. However, I don't feel up for a GAR Krish, sorry again. NumerounovedantTalk 06:50, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup 2017 November newsletter: Final results

The final round of the 2017 WikiCup is over. Congratulations to the 2017 WikiCup top three finalists:

• First Place - Adityavagarwal (submissions)
• Second Place - Vanamonde (submissions)
• Third Place - Cas Liber (submissions)

In addition to recognizing the achievements of the top finishers and everyone who worked hard to make it to the final round, we also want to recognize those participants who were most productive in each of the WikiCup scoring categories:

• Featured Article – Cas Liber (actually a two-way tie with themselves for an astonishing five FAs in R2 and R4).
• Good Article – Adityavagarwal had 14 GAs promoted in R5.
• Featured List – Bloom6132 (submissions) and 1989 (submissions) both produced 2 FLs in R2
• Featured Pictures – SounderBruce (submissions) improved an image to FP status in R5, the only FP this year.
• Featured Topic – MPJ-DK (submissions) has the only FT of the Cup in R3.
• Good Topic – Four different editors created a GT in R2, R3 and R4.
• Did You Know – Adityavagarwal had 22 DYKs on the main page in R5.
• In The News – MBlaze Lightning (submissions) had 14 ITN on the main page in R2.
• Good Article Review – Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (submissions) completed 31 GARs in R1.

Over the course of the 2017 WikiCup the following content was added or improved on Wikipedia: 51 Featured Articles, 292 Good Articles, 18 Featured Lists, 1 Featured Picture, 1 Featured Topics, 4 Good Topics, around 400 Did You Knows, 75 In The News, and 442 Good Article Reviews. Thank you to all the competitors for your hard work and what you have done to improve Wikipedia.

Regarding the prize vouchers - @Adityavagarwal, Vanamonde93, Casliber, Bloom6132, 1989, and SounderBruce: please send Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) an email from the email address to which you would like your Amazon voucher sent. Please include your preference of global Amazon marketplace as well. We hope to have the electronic gift cards processed and sent within a week.

We will open up a discussion for comments on process and scoring in a few days. The 2018 WikiCup is just around the corner! Many thanks from all the judges. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), and Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:41, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018

So the 2017 WikiCup has come to an end. Congratulations to the winner, to the other finalists and to all those who took part. 177 contestants signed up, more than usual, but not all of them submitted entries in the first round. Were editors attracted by the cash prizes offered for the first time this year, or were these irrelevant? Do the rules and scoring need changing for the 2018 WikiCup? If you have a view on these or other matters, why not join in the WikiCup discussion about next year's contest? Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Moneyball (film)/archive1

I would appreciate your comments as always, Vedant. This is my first attempt at a Hollywood film accolades list BTW.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 16:20, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by The Tree of Life (film)/archive1

I would appreciate your comments here too, Vedant. Do let me know if you are interested in reviewing this by pinging me. Thank you.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 07:13, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

November 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at Sonia Gandhi. Capitals00 (talk) 11:25, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Nothing is without a source, if only Wikipedia gave some breathing space you would see. NumerounovedantTalk 11:30, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

ARBIPA sanctions alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Capitals00 (talk) 11:28, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi

Thanks for your comments and support at the FLC. How are you? It's been a while. Yashthepunisher (talk) 11:37, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Hey Yash, yess long time! I've been good, thanks for asking. Been busy with final year of college​ and other things. How have you been? NumerounovedantTalk 11:42, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

If that's the case, you should concentrate on the studies. I am good and active nowadays on WP, don't know for how long. Any future WP plans? Yashthepunisher (talk) 11:59, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Yess, just six more months xD. I did have plans to go back to Knightley's article, a couple of Grey's Anatomy episodes. I also wanted to work on Sonia Gandhi, but that turned out exacly how i thought it would. So, I'll give that a rest and do a lot of homework for the artcile's main body first, maybe in the sandbox. I also wanted to work on Ribbon's article. You should watch it, if at all you get a chance, it's an impressive debut film.

What about you? I'd love to be the sidekick on one of your projects, if you need one as I really don't feel up for talking up anything new already. NumerounovedantTalk 12:27, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Articles related to politics are always tough to work on. Sure, films like Ribbon and Death in the Gunj are on my watch-list now. And Don't be so harsh on yourself, you have done much for Indian cinema articles here and we can work as collaborators and not as some 'sidekick'. I'm currently working on Satya. Lets see. Yashthepunisher (talk) 13:14, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

It's been a weird year for Indian cinema, no film could inspire me to work here whatsoever. That has a part to play in my inactivity. Also, particularly interesting have been my renewed and newfound interest sports and politics respectively.

But yes, I'd love to work together, maybe somewhere we can contribute with a similar level of interest. Anddd, a sidekick may as well be just as good the hero. xD NumerounovedantTalk 13:39, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Trapped, Toilet, Shubh Mangal Saavdhan, Newton and Death in the Gunj were quite good this year. Sure thing, we will definitely collaborate in the near future. Cheers! Yashthepunisher (talk) 15:25, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Agreed Yash, I've seen 3 of them. Will try and watch Newton and Toilet too.

If something comes up that you want to work on, you know where to find me. I'll be on the lookout too. xD NumerounovedantTalk 18:04, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Sure Brother. Yashthepunisher (talk) 18:10, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Train-the-Trainer 2018: Invitation to participate

Hello, it gives us great pleasure to inform that the Train-the-Trainer (TTT) 2018 programme organised by CIS-A2K is going to be held from 26–28 January 2018.

• What is TTT?

Train the Trainer or TTT is a residential training program. The program attempts to groom leadership skills among the Indian Wikimedia community members. Earlier TTT have been conducted in 2013, 2015, 2016, and 2017.

• Who should join?

An editor who is interested to conduct real-life and online Wiki-events such as outreach, workshop, GLAM, edit-a-thon, photowalk etc.

Any active Wikimedian contributing to any Indic language Wikimedia project is eligible to apply.

An editor must have 500+ edits.

Anyone who have already participated in an earlier iteration of TTT, can not apply.

Please see more about this program at: CIS-A2K/Events/Train the Trainer Program/2018. Please fill this form to show your interest to join. The last date of signing up is 7 December 2017. If you have any question, please let us know.

On behalf of Titodutta. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 11:23, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

FL

Hey! Vedant, I would appreciate your comments here like I always have. Thanks.Krish | Talk 10:34, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Yes Krish!, in a day or two. NumerounovedantTalk 10:48, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

A gentle reminder.Krish | Talk 11:10, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Please TalkBack at the FLC page. Thanks.Krish | Talk 19:35, 14 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Numerounovedant. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Steve McQueen filmography/archive1

I would appreciate your comments as always here, Vedant. Do let me know if you are interested in reviewing this by pinging me. Thank you.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 12:57, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

I'll surely try Ssven2. NumerounovedantTalk 05:10, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

FLC

Hi, can you please leave your comments on this FLC of mine? It has been inactive for a while. Yashthepunisher (talk) 15:47, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

@Yashthepunisher: I've left some comments. NumerounovedantTalk 08:37, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Thanks much. Yashthepunisher (talk) 13:06, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Thank you actually, it was interesting to come across so many regional writers that i had never heard of, i am all for reading the likes of the list there! Also Yash, let me know if you'd be interested in reviewing My Friend Pinto for GA. I'll only nominate if you'd have any time to spare at all. NumerounovedantTalk 18:29, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Sure thing, I will review it. But first, expand the lead of this article to a reasonable size. Yashthepunisher (talk) 11:24, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Yes, that and a soundtrack section. I'll let you know when that's done, thank you so much. NumerounovedantTalk 12:11, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

@Yashthepunisher: feeling up for it? NumerounovedantTalk 13:35, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Sure. Yashthepunisher (talk) 13:41, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Merry Christmas to all!

	We wish you a Merry Christmas and a prosperous New Year 2018!
	Wishing you and yours a Merry Christmas, and a Happy, Glorious, Prosperous New Year! God bless!  — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 10:24, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Back at you Ssven2! NumerounovedantTalk 19:07, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Help

Would you like to review this? I want to take a long break from wiring here and before that I need to be done with these. Bajirao Mastani review is already underway, this is the only complete work which is pending. I would appreciate your gesture. Thanks.Krish | Talk 13:05, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

I'll take a look tomorrow and let you know soon Krish. NumerounovedantTalk 19:27, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

So?Krish | Talk 05:19, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

I am sorry Krish, it's a bulky article and I just do not have the time. NumerounovedantTalk 18:48, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of My Friend Pinto

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article My Friend Pinto you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Yashthepunisher -- Yashthepunisher (talk) 14:01, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Hannah Baker

Hi Numerounovedant, I've significantly reduced the 'storyline' section, but it could still use some futher work. The Reception section has lots of off-topic text about the series, rather than the character, that should be removed to 13 Reasons Why per WP:COATRACK and Stay on topic. I'll leave that up to other editors though. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 00:59, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Thank you so much Baffle gab. I really appreciate the help. NumerounovedantTalk 06:09, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

No worries; good luck with the article, and Happy New Year. :) Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 06:15, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Right back at you. Cheers. NumerounovedantTalk 06:19, 29 December 2017 (UTC)