Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Vishwaroopam/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:32, 18 August 2017 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of accolades received by Vishwaroopam edit

Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Vishwaroopam/archive1

Nominator(s): — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 07:53, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article provides a listing of the notable awards and nominations received by the 2013 Indian Tamil spy film, Vishwaroopam starring Kamal Haasan and Pooja Kumar. This film is notable for garnering its cast and crew members several awards and nominations. It is my sixth attempt at a accolades FLC. Any constructive comments to improve this list are most welcome. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 07:53, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Pavanjandhyala

Can't we just limit the supporting actors to three or four? There are six entries at present, and each has a citation at its back. That does look something not alright.
Plot summary, if available, is advisable to be placed before the details about the technical crew.
No comments on anything in the second paragraph. It is fine.
"... Lalgudi N. Ilayaraaja and Boontawee 'Thor' Taweepasas received the award for Best Art Director" -- Why are you mentioning their full names again here?
Refs look fine, and anyways the one doing a source review would comment on issues if any.

Well written one, on par with the standards you usually exhibit. Let me know once you are done. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 10:03, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala: All of your above comments have been resolved. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 10:42, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I see that. Glad to support this nomination. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:50, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Pavanjandhyala: Thanks, Pavan. Your thoughts and comments are greatly appreciated. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 16:47, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Aoba47

I would include a period in the caption for the photo as it is a complete sentence/thought.
I am uncertain about the wording of the first sentence. It makes me think that Haasan wrote and directly the film by himself, even though he wrote it with someone else. You address this in the next sentence, but it seems a little contradictory to say that he wrote the film, and in the next sentence say that he co-wrote it.
I am confused by the placement of the references in the sentence on the supporting role. Why not just put Reference 2 at the end of the sentence, rather than repeating it for only some of the actors and breaking up the flow of the content?
In the first two sentences of the lead's second paragraph, I would avoid repeating the name of the film twice (especially as a way to start the sentence).
Would it be better to move the last sentence of the second paragraph to the start of the third paragraph? The second paragraph appears to focus primarily on the release and commercial performance, while the last sentence would seem better suited for the third paragraph's focus on the awards and nominations for the film.

Everything else looks good. Wonderful work with this list. I will support this once my comments are addressed. Aoba47 (talk) 14:17, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Aoba47: All of your above comments have been resolved. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 08:27, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for addressing my comments. I support this. Great work as always. Aoba47 (talk) 12:54, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support good work on the list but I think you should link Haasan in the image caption and the currency sign only once. – FrB.TG (talk) 10:05, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Aoba47 and FrB.TG: Thanks guys. Your thoughts and comments are greatly appreciated. Frank, I have resolved your comments BTW. Can you guys also take a look at my other FLC too (Pavanjandhyala too)? Thanks again. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 16:58, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

"screenplay and dialogues with" by "dialogues" do you just mean "script"?

@The Rambling Man: Yes, but I am making it specific as screenplay is also part of the script. I have changed "screenplay and dialogues" to "script". — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 16:43, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No need to abbreviate to RAW when you don't use it again.
Is caesium really spelled without an a in Indian English?
"A bilingual, made" missing "film" after bilingual here I think.
" was done by" reads clumsily to me.
"film had its release on " -> "film was released on"
"Recipients and Nominees -> nominees.

The Rambling Man (talk) 11:23, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@The Rambling Man: The rest have been resolved. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 16:43, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support: Although I had read the list way back in July, when Ssven2 asked me look, I was not able to put my comments. After reading this again, I think it has only got better. Sorry for the delay Buddy!Krish | Talk 12:49, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Almost ready to promote- can you add on "|language=" tags to the non-English refs, like the Ananda Vikatan ones? Source review passed other than that. --Pres N 01:37, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@PresN: Done. As asked. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 08:34, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted. --Pres N 20:08, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.