Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates

Active discussions
The closure log

Comments from Giants2008 (talk · contribs), PresN (talk · contribs), and The Rambling Man (talk · contribs), and other notes of pertinence. Should you wish to contact the delegates, you can use the {{@FLC}} ping facility.

FLC
  • Unsuccessful
    • None
  • FLCs of special note
    • We now have many lists in need of more attention. See here for the oldest ones. Please do what you can to contribute to these nominations!

FLRC
  • Kept
    • None
  • Delisted
    • None
  • FLRCs of special note
    • None

Make "Introductory Summary" a requirement for Featured topicsEdit

Hi all. Comments most welcome at Wikipedia talk:Featured and good topic candidates#Make "Introductory Summary" a requirement for Featured topics. Best - Aza24 (talk) 02:45, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Pop Smoke discographyEdit

The Pop Smoke discography needs to be closed. It has been opened since February and has not been going well at all. I am planning on retiring in July and by the looks of it, the article will not be promoted. You know I'm shooting for the stars, aiming for the moon 💫 (talk) 07:42, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

I'm interpreting this as you wanting the nomination withdrawn, so closed, though to be clear, it "has not been going well" because you didn't return to the nomination to respond to concerns for the past couple months rather than due to any major problems- if you don't retire, feel free to renominate it if you're able to respond to comments. --PresN 13:46, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

FL: 1st Central Committee of the Workers' Party of North KoreaEdit

Has this passed? Is there a reason why it hasn't passed? --Ruling party (talk) 08:42, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

It has not passed; although it's been open for quite a while, it hasn't gotten enough reviews for me to feel comfortable promoting it (and presumably the other two feel the same). I don't have the availability to give it a review myself at the moment, sorry. --PresN 04:10, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
@PresN: How long does it need to wait? Other lists that were nominated at the same time have already passed. --Ruling party (talk) 12:28, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
@Ruling party: It's not based on time, it's based on getting enough in-depth reviews. Other lists that were nominated after that have passed because they got sufficient reviewer attention; no comments have been left on the 1st Central Committee FLC in almost 2 months. I'd recommend seeking out likely reviewers or projects to take a look. --PresN 03:22, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

6-month old nomination just addedEdit

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Spaceflight before 1951/archive1 was just added (by me) to the bottom of the page. It's in a weird state- it was started in December but never transcluded here, which normally would see it deleted (as I just did with two other ancient, empty nominations)... except that enough people were directly notified that it actually has a lot of discussion and two supports. So, I've added it here instead, as our oldest nomination by quite a lot. --PresN 15:16, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Much appreciated! With the issues with the tables (which is a VERY big issue since it affects all of the Timeline articles) and also the back and forth re: reliability of sources, is there some sort of lesser level of quality these articles could be given that still reflects the ridiculous amount of time I've put into salvaging to make them serviceable? Is there a "Good List" analog to "Good Article"? Thanks. --Neopeius (talk) 04:27, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Discussion re possibly creating a Good List criteriaEdit

Please be advised there of a discussion at WT GA: Lists and GAN. Any advice, suggestions or comments are welcome. — Maile (talk) 15:38, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

Return to the project page "Featured list candidates".