Orphaned non-free image File:No Frills Brand.JPG edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:No Frills Brand.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:02, 25 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

A belated welcome! edit

 
Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!  

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Kiwichris. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome!  Masum Ibn Musa  Conversation 15:31, 21 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Shortened footnotes edit

Hi Kiwichris, thanks for your good work on NZ politics articles. I see you've quoted different pages from the same book at the Jim McLay. Shortened footnotes is a much more suitable reference style for this; I'll change that over step-by-step; have a look at the diffs (start with this one) if you want to find out how to do that. Schwede66 09:39, 8 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi again, thought I'd add to this old item as the heading is the correct one. With this edit, you changed {{sfn|Norton|1988|p=247}} to {{sfn|Norton|1988|pp=247}}, and as the template documentation explains, the initial version was correct. Would you mind changing it back? I appreciate your ongoing hard work! Schwede66 17:16, 3 November 2017 (UTC)Reply


Hopefully that has fixed it. Kiwichris (talk) 06:02, 4 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

1,000 edits edit

  The New Zealand Barnstar of National Merit
Well, you've gone through the 1,000 edits barrier, and I have seen many of your edits on my watchlist, as our interests cross over. You have, from day 1, made a very useful contribution to New Zealand politics articles. Thank you!
this WikiAward was given to Kiwichris by Schwede66 on 08:48, 26 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

And if you'd like to get a suggestion on how to be even better, a simple suggestion is to use edit summaries. Schwede66 08:48, 26 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Autopatrolled granted edit

 

Hi Kiwichris, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! MusikAnimal talk 20:17, 18 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Electorate maps edit

Hi Kiwichris, I'm delighted to see the 1938 electorate map turn up. Where did the boundary data come from? I'd be keen to illustrate some of the longer by-election articles with maps and wonder whether we could work on that together. Schwede66 18:38, 1 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Sounds like a plan. For the base image, I used this file as a template. For the new boundaries and allocations I used a map on page 35 of Barry Gustafson's history of the National Party. Kiwichris (talk) 05:43, 2 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
I see. So it's traced by hand, as opposed to you having found a GIS file or some such. I have a copy of the Electoral Atlas of New Zealand that contains all the maps up until the 1980s, but it's packed away as our house is under EQC repair. So if I send you scans, could that be of help? Or should I trace maps myself in Google Earth and send you the KML file? Schwede66 20:49, 2 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
You can send me scans/photos and I can make new maps if you like. I'm a bit of a novice with Google earth, so not too sure about KML files. I was planning to go to the library here (which has a reference copy of Electoral Atlas of New Zealand) and scan some of the maps myself when I get a chance. The 1938 map is only the first of many I plan to make. Some of the pages for obsolete electorates would also benefit greatly from this as well which, as you say, will benefit by-election pages too.Kiwichris (talk) 06:03, 3 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Photo licence edit

Re Ray Ahipene-Mercer, where does it say that the photo is creative commons? Just wondering because if it's not, you'll be getting into strife over it. Schwede66 07:25, 15 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Bottom left corner.Kiwichris (talk) 07:52, 15 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
Ah, didn't spot that. But it's "NC" (non-commercial), which isn't allowed on Wikimedia Commons. Schwede66 09:04, 15 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Cut paste move edit

I've reverted your cut paste move of the 1910 by-election. WP:CUTPASTE explains why a cut paste move is "highly undesirable". Easy to avoid; simply move the page instead. That way, a redirect to the new location is automatically created. Any queries, please ask; here's good. Schwede66 20:05, 22 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:New Zealand Cricket All-time XI edit

 Template:New Zealand Cricket All-time XI has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. IgnorantArmies (talk) 17:53, 8 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Senior Whip of the Labour Party edit

It seems that for a while the title was Chief Whip instead of Senior Whip. Do you know anything about the name change or dates for it? Mattlore (talk) 08:01, 29 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Regrettably not. Wilson only gives the term senior (for all parties) going back to 1890 when his list begins. Kiwichris (talk) 08:29, 29 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Robert Hornblow edit

By the way, you didn't overlook anything, but I only wrote that bio this morning. Schwede66 03:06, 8 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

That's cool. Nice job with the article! Kiwichris (talk) 03:17, 8 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Initials edit

The Manual of Style says that initials use fullstops. Schwede66 08:06, 28 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Democrats for Social Credit candidates edit

Hi, thanks for undoing the edit. I carried on from User:Yarrowworks' initial editing, turns out they didn't realise either. Ajf773 (talk) 17:41, 28 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Berkeley Dallard cut-and-paste move edit

  Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give B. L. Dallard a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Berkeley Dallard. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Ollieinc (talk) 09:29, 5 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Adding full names edit

I've been around for long enough that I could remember that name (Neil Cherry). Thanks for all your good work replacing initials with full names. Much appreciated! Schwede66 07:29, 15 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Moving articles edit

By the way, when you move an article, it's a very simple process to tidy up the links using AutoWikiBrowser. You may not want to have to learn another tool, and if that's the case, you could do the following:

  • check 'what links here', identify incoming links from templates, and update them manually
  • let me know that you've moved an article, and I'll tidy things up next time I run AWB (as I've just done with Jerry Skinner)

The reason for the manual template update first is that it takes a wee while for the WP database to catch up on template transclusions. So when I come along, that would presumably have sorted itself, and the resulting list of links to deal with would then be quite a bit shorter. Happy to help in that way if you wish. Schwede66 08:56, 22 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:New Zealand Labour Party logo.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:New Zealand Labour Party logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 21 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Colours & Metiria Turei edit

Good work on restoring the colours of the parties at New Zealand general election, 2017. I thought something was missing after my edit but couldn't figure it out. Also, it seems you were right about Metiria Turei. This is a list of candidates in the Te Tai Tonga electorate, and Turei's name appears as a candidate. So it appears that even after stepping down from the Green list and announcing that she would retire from politics at the election, she in fact ran for election. Akld guy (talk) 23:12, 29 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

About NZ FPTP Election Boxes edit

Hi Kiwichris, I see that you have removed some of the changes I have made to NZ election boxes (FPTP), without an edit summary attached. Is there a particular reason for doing this? I have made it a personal mission (for when I have the time) to update the election summaries for the pre-MMP era, since I believe it is important to show each party's ownership of the electorates over time. I will be reverting your changes, unless they are justified TechnicalForte (talk) 06:52, 8 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Well we've never used those previously so it just seems strange to start now. I would say the reason no other users over the years have added the hold/change boxes is that it is already pretty obvious which party has won the electorate already by looking at the highest polling candidate therefore "each party's ownership of the electorates" is already evident with what we have. Also, those boxes are mainly used to calculate "swing" which was never much of a feature in NZ politics pre 1996. Kiwichris (talk) 07:01, 8 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

I haven't been around for long, but I do know that Wikipedia is meant to be continuously improved with time. Even if we have not added those summary boxes, they are a key component of the other Anglospheric nations that use FPTP (namely the USA, UK, and Canada), so NZ should be up to their standards - despite our FPTP elections being in the past. I still see no real reason to nullify the improvements that I am making, so I will be reverting them. Thanks for your consideration. TechnicalForte (talk) 10:57, 10 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

As you're new to Wikipedia I'll advise you that decisions like this are made by consensus, not by individual users jumping in head first and then dictating their terms to others. Kiwichris (talk) 11:16, 10 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Gaurav Sharma (politician) edit

 

The article Gaurav Sharma (politician) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Failed political candidate with the expected level of coverage for that; doesn't meet WP:NPOL or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 19:35, 12 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Kiwichris. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Gaurav Sharma (politician) edit

 

The article Gaurav Sharma (politician) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

As per discussion here fails WP:POLITICIAN and doesn't meet WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. NZFC(talk) 18:20, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Gaurav Sharma (politician) for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gaurav Sharma (politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaurav Sharma (politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NZFC(talk) 19:40, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Christians Against Abortion/meta/shortname edit

 Template:Christians Against Abortion/meta/shortname has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 17:43, 23 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Simon Bridges image edit

Wikipedia is a non-profit organisation, why would an image with a license that excludes commercial use not be allowed here? Clesam11 (talk) 04:07, 14 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Check here for an explanation regarding what licences can and can't be used on Wikipedia. The image has not yet been reviewed by an admin, but when it is it will be nominated for deletion. Its annoying, but that's the way Wikipedia works. Kiwichris (talk) 04:17, 14 February 2018 (UTC)Reply
Very odd given it's not being used for commercial use. Oh well, thanks. Clesam11 (talk) 04:29, 14 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of National Party of Australia leadership election, 2016 for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National Party of Australia leadership election, 2016 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Party of Australia leadership election, 2016 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. StAnselm (talk) 08:56, 20 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

New article edit

Please take a look at (and add to?) List of electoral firsts in New Zealand, partly based on List of electoral firsts in the United Kingdom but with wider coverage of MPs and ministers generally. Hugo999 (talk) 03:42, 27 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nice work with the article! I've added a bunch of stuff that immediately sprang to mind. Be sure to check out this page also with regards to dates of MPs longevity. Kiwichris (talk) 04:33, 27 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Members of the New Zealand Parliament who have served for at least 30 years for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Members of the New Zealand Parliament who have served for at least 30 years is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Members of the New Zealand Parliament who have served for at least 30 years until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ―Justin (koavf)TCM 06:42, 22 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Typo in file name? edit

The file name of the image of the mayor of Auckland, Charles Grey, seems to contain a misspelling of his name as "Gery". The file is here. Can we clear this up? Akld guy (talk) 11:02, 30 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

I've requested a renaming on Commons. Kiwichris (talk) 11:09, 30 September 2018 (UTC)Reply
OK, so long as he's positively identified and not some other mayor. Akld guy (talk) 11:15, 30 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Kiwichris. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

A kitten for you! edit

 

Good work for spotting and correcting all those Qld Labor Party errors!

Kerry (talk) 23:26, 4 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Election box begin edit

HNY to you. Following the recent change in naming convention for election articles, I suggest that headers of election results tables should no longer be "General election, YYYY" but should move to "YYYY general election". What do you think? If you concur, I'll sit down and set up an AWB run, so there's no need to go through and update everything manually. Schwede66 03:39, 21 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Yeah makes sense to match the conventions and if you can automate it so much the better! Kiwichris (talk) 03:49, 21 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problem on 2019 Christchurch mayoral election edit

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://www.radionz.co.nz/news/political/383935/race-for-the-mayoralty-what-you-need-to-know, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:13, 6 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

I see your point, but the content was just a list of dates and corresponding events. It is quite hard to reword something so basic. Kiwichris (talk) 07:24, 7 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:2002 New Zealand general election by electorate edit

 Template:2002 New Zealand general election by electorate has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 00:09, 16 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Original Barnstar
Keep up with your New Zealand local election creations. Sheldybett (talk) 13:30, 22 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Christchurch mayoral election articles edit

Kia ora Chris, thanks for writing all those mayoral election articles. That's awesome work. What I've just done is to run QuickStatements on Wikidata. That means that we've got a complete record of Wikidata entries for the the Christchurch mayoral elections starting in 1875. So if you set up any further articles, there is a Wikidata entry that you can readily link to.

Once you've got a spreadsheet for QuickStatements set up this is a relatively simple task. If you'd like me to set up complete election sets for other cities be in touch and we can work together on this. This process is also good for filling out empty fields for those items where a Wikidata entry exists already. Schwede66 01:09, 11 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

No worries, I have got results for Chch elections up to 1995. I'm currently on holiday but will get articles for them up when I get back to NZ. I have to admit I don't really know how to set up wikidata very well, so any pointers would definitley be appreciated! Kiwichris (talk) 04:42, 13 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

DLP in election boxes edit

Hi there. I've only just noticed, but back in December you went through and changed a bunch of election boxes on pages like Electoral results for the Division of Maribyrnong, changing "DLP" to "Democratic Labor" for elections in the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s. The problem is that all these links are now broken, pointing to the current Democratic Labour Party (Australia) rather than the Democratic Labor Party (historical) as they should. This is why they were all "DLP", because the template is set up so that DLP points to the historical party and "Democratic Labor" to the current one. Would you mind fixing all these up? Frickeg (talk) 04:08, 20 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

I've just noticed it's in a whole bunch of other articles as well, e.g. Candidates of the 1973 Victorian state election, 1973 Victorian state election, 1963 Australian federal election, particularly with the colour templates. Please fix these all up - they were carefully organised so that we had them linking properly to the appropriate articles/colours. If you have any evidence that the DLP used this wheat-colour they've recently adopted in the 50s/60s/70s I'd love to see it (I have tried many times to try to find their "official" colour back then). Frickeg (talk) 04:15, 20 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for alerting me to this. It seems someone has changed this template to register "democratic labor" as the modern DLP erroneously as this was the spelling used by the historical party (old DLP had no "u" but the modern does). I've fixed the template again and the edits you listed above should now link to the historic DLP. Additionally, I concur regarding colouring, the original DLP used blue in their advertising not amber. Kiwichris (talk) 07:38, 20 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
Hi, that was actually me because the modern DLP used the "Labor" spelling before 2013, so we need a way to make the election boxes show "Democratic Labor" (linking to the current party) for elections between 1980 and 2013 (because this template works in conjunction with the the name template). So it should be DLP = historical party, Democratic Labor = modern party with -or spelling, Democratic Labour = modern party with -our spelling. Frickeg (talk) 01:05, 21 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
Hi, have you had a chance to look at this? They were all carefully calibrated until you went through and changed them, and I'm hoping you used some sort of automated tool because then the revert will be easy. Otherwise I will seek some help from other OzPol editors, but it would be nice if you could help. Open to easier solutions if you have any! Frickeg (talk) 02:49, 3 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Location for next Wellington Meetup edit

Kia ora, I'm letting all those interested in Wellington Wikipedia / Wikidata / Wikicommons meetups know that the location for the next two meet ups has changed. The location for the Wellington Meetup 17 August 2019 and Wellington Meetup 31 August 2019 is now in the Alexander Turnbull Library Reading Room, Level 1, National Library. The National Library net.work space area will be closed for building work from 12 August. See the meetup pages for more information. Looking forward to seeing you there. Einebillion (talk) 05:15, 3 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

All good thanks for letting me know. Kiwichris (talk) 05:59, 3 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Harbour Board edit

Just about to change things. Eddaido (talk) 12:21, 11 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Do you see where these photos came from? How they got there? Eddaido (talk) 12:31, 11 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

What do you mean? Kiwichris (talk) 02:47, 12 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Suggested link for 2020 New Zealand general election page edit

Morena @Kiwichris

This is Kalena from the NZ Ministry of Justice Comms team. We noticed you had recently edited 2020_New_Zealand_general_election and we're asking for your assistance to add a reference to the page. The official web site for the 2020 referendums has gone live at https://www.referendum.govt.nz/ but it is not yet featured on Wikipedia. As we are not Wikipedia editors, we don't want to make edits to the page and break any code. Are you able to add the web site to relevant Wikipedia pages on our behalf? Apart from the main 2020 election page, other pages requiring the external link reference are:

2020 New Zealand cannabis referendum | 2020 New Zealand euthanasia referendum | End of Life Choice Act

Thank you --Justicenz (talk) 20:48, 11 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

I have added links to both the referendum pages, but think that including them on the articles of the act and election would be beyond their scope. Also, the best place to suggest edits in the future is on the talk page of an article. Kiwichris (talk) 04:05, 14 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Auckland local body elections, 1974 edit

Hi, I see you're the main author of 1974 Auckland City mayoral election. I'm looking for the Auckland local body election results for the Values Party in 1974. Can you suggest any sources, online or offline? Thanks. Muzilon (talk) 04:32, 8 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, the only place I could ever find this sort of information was in contemporary media. I had to look up newspapers on microfiche in libraries. So that would be your best bet. Kiwichris (talk) 06:06, 8 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Future elections in New Zealand edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Future elections in New Zealand requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:08, 29 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Linter errors edit

Hope your bubble is all good. Please review wikipedia:Linter. You are probably unaware that the removal of half the ‘bold’ markings causes a problem. Schwede66 09:32, 12 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Future elections in New Zealand edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Future elections in New Zealand requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 13:32, 18 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Survey on proposed 2021 Wikimedia Aotearoa conference edit

Hi there, as an editor in Aotearoa I wanted to let you know about the survey currently running to catch people's interest in an in-person conference in 20201. Here is the link - it's open til 18 November. https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/K37CY2B MurielMary (talk) 10:36, 30 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Helen White (politician) edit

On 25 November 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Helen White (politician), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 42 new MPs were elected to the 53rd New Zealand Parliament: 23 for Labour, including Arena Williams, Ibrahim Omer, Helen White, Neru Leavasa, Ingrid Leary, Rachel Brooking, Anna Lorck, Tracey McLellan, and Shanan Halbert (all pictured); 5 for National, including Joseph Mooney, Simon Watts, and Penny Simmonds; 9 for ACT, including Toni Severin, Simon Court, Brooke van Velden, and Chris Baillie; 3 for the Greens, including Ricardo Menéndez March and Teanau Tuiono; and 2 for Māori, including Rawiri Waititi? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Helen White (politician)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—valereee (talk) 00:04, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Arena Williams edit

On 25 November 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Arena Williams, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 42 new MPs were elected to the 53rd New Zealand Parliament: 23 for Labour, including Arena Williams, Ibrahim Omer, Helen White, Neru Leavasa, Ingrid Leary, Rachel Brooking, Anna Lorck, Tracey McLellan, and Shanan Halbert (all pictured); 5 for National, including Joseph Mooney, Simon Watts, and Penny Simmonds; 9 for ACT, including Toni Severin, Simon Court, Brooke van Velden, and Chris Baillie; 3 for the Greens, including Ricardo Menéndez March and Teanau Tuiono; and 2 for Māori, including Rawiri Waititi? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Arena Williams), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—valereee (talk) 00:05, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Rachel Brooking edit

On 25 November 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rachel Brooking, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 42 new MPs were elected to the 53rd New Zealand Parliament: 23 for Labour, including Arena Williams, Ibrahim Omer, Helen White, Neru Leavasa, Ingrid Leary, Rachel Brooking, Anna Lorck, Tracey McLellan, and Shanan Halbert (all pictured); 5 for National, including Joseph Mooney, Simon Watts, and Penny Simmonds; 9 for ACT, including Toni Severin, Simon Court, Brooke van Velden, and Chris Baillie; 3 for the Greens, including Ricardo Menéndez March and Teanau Tuiono; and 2 for Māori, including Rawiri Waititi? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Rachel Brooking), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—valereee (talk) 00:06, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Anna Lorck edit

On 25 November 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Anna Lorck, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 42 new MPs were elected to the 53rd New Zealand Parliament: 23 for Labour, including Arena Williams, Ibrahim Omer, Helen White, Neru Leavasa, Ingrid Leary, Rachel Brooking, Anna Lorck, Tracey McLellan, and Shanan Halbert (all pictured); 5 for National, including Joseph Mooney, Simon Watts, and Penny Simmonds; 9 for ACT, including Toni Severin, Simon Court, Brooke van Velden, and Chris Baillie; 3 for the Greens, including Ricardo Menéndez March and Teanau Tuiono; and 2 for Māori, including Rawiri Waititi? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Anna Lorck), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—valereee (talk) 00:06, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Tracey McLellan edit

On 25 November 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tracey McLellan, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 42 new MPs were elected to the 53rd New Zealand Parliament: 23 for Labour, including Arena Williams, Ibrahim Omer, Helen White, Neru Leavasa, Ingrid Leary, Rachel Brooking, Anna Lorck, Tracey McLellan, and Shanan Halbert (all pictured); 5 for National, including Joseph Mooney, Simon Watts, and Penny Simmonds; 9 for ACT, including Toni Severin, Simon Court, Brooke van Velden, and Chris Baillie; 3 for the Greens, including Ricardo Menéndez March and Teanau Tuiono; and 2 for Māori, including Rawiri Waititi? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Tracey McLellan), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—valereee (talk) 00:06, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Shanan Halbert edit

On 25 November 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Shanan Halbert, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 42 new MPs were elected to the 53rd New Zealand Parliament: 23 for Labour, including Arena Williams, Ibrahim Omer, Helen White, Neru Leavasa, Ingrid Leary, Rachel Brooking, Anna Lorck, Tracey McLellan, and Shanan Halbert (all pictured); 5 for National, including Joseph Mooney, Simon Watts, and Penny Simmonds; 9 for ACT, including Toni Severin, Simon Court, Brooke van Velden, and Chris Baillie; 3 for the Greens, including Ricardo Menéndez March and Teanau Tuiono; and 2 for Māori, including Rawiri Waititi? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Shanan Halbert), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—valereee (talk) 00:07, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Joseph Mooney (New Zealand politician) edit

On 25 November 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Joseph Mooney (New Zealand politician), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 42 new MPs were elected to the 53rd New Zealand Parliament: 23 for Labour, including Arena Williams, Ibrahim Omer, Helen White, Neru Leavasa, Ingrid Leary, Rachel Brooking, Anna Lorck, Tracey McLellan, and Shanan Halbert (all pictured); 5 for National, including Joseph Mooney, Simon Watts, and Penny Simmonds; 9 for ACT, including Toni Severin, Simon Court, Brooke van Velden, and Chris Baillie; 3 for the Greens, including Ricardo Menéndez March and Teanau Tuiono; and 2 for Māori, including Rawiri Waititi? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Joseph Mooney (New Zealand politician)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—valereee (talk) 00:07, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Simon Watts edit

On 25 November 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Simon Watts, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 42 new MPs were elected to the 53rd New Zealand Parliament: 23 for Labour, including Arena Williams, Ibrahim Omer, Helen White, Neru Leavasa, Ingrid Leary, Rachel Brooking, Anna Lorck, Tracey McLellan, and Shanan Halbert (all pictured); 5 for National, including Joseph Mooney, Simon Watts, and Penny Simmonds; 9 for ACT, including Toni Severin, Simon Court, Brooke van Velden, and Chris Baillie; 3 for the Greens, including Ricardo Menéndez March and Teanau Tuiono; and 2 for Māori, including Rawiri Waititi? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Simon Watts), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—valereee (talk) 00:07, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Ricardo Menéndez March edit

On 25 November 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ricardo Menéndez March, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 42 new MPs were elected to the 53rd New Zealand Parliament: 23 for Labour, including Arena Williams, Ibrahim Omer, Helen White, Neru Leavasa, Ingrid Leary, Rachel Brooking, Anna Lorck, Tracey McLellan, and Shanan Halbert (all pictured); 5 for National, including Joseph Mooney, Simon Watts, and Penny Simmonds; 9 for ACT, including Toni Severin, Simon Court, Brooke van Velden, and Chris Baillie; 3 for the Greens, including Ricardo Menéndez March and Teanau Tuiono; and 2 for Māori, including Rawiri Waititi? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Ricardo Menéndez March), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

—valereee (talk) 00:20, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Article proposal edit

Hello, I've considering creating a page and want to know if it meets GNG. Schwede66 recommended I ask you.

It can be found here, if you're interested in giving your thoughts.

Nexus000 (talk) 11:44, 27 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Rut Golden Bay-Motueka edit

 Template:Rut Golden Bay-Motueka has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 21:08, 6 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

National Library edit

Kia ora, do I understand it right that you have access to material at the National Library? If so, I wonder if you could do me a favour. I believe NatLib holds The Southland Times on microfilm. I was fishing around for anything about William Young (New Zealand politician) of Otahuti in Southland; he's the MLC who we know least about by quite some margin. There are two contenders that I could find:

  1. William Young, died 13 May 1959 aged 82 and was buried at Calcium Cemetery, which is under 6 km from Otahuti. It's a distinct possibility that this is the right person as his will mentions that his son is a farmer in Otahuti.
  2. If that's not a hit, then I think there's a fair chance that this is him.

Either way, there would presumably be an obituary in said newspaper for an ex-MLC; that would at least be worth a mention, I'd think. Could you possibly have a look for something following the respective deaths on 13 May 1959 and 18 December 1967? There's no particular hurry, of course, but any help would be much appreciated. Schwede66 23:12, 16 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

In pre-covid times I would visit the National Library every now and then. Since then the only time I've been in the area it has been closed. Next time I am able to visit (could be some time yet) I'll have a look for this MLC obituary though. Not sure if they do have Southland Times, but they definitely have ODT so can check that at the least. Kiwichris (talk) 02:35, 17 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks heaps. Staff from the parliamentary library tell me that they do hold the Southland Times. But yes, the ODT may have picked up on the death, too. I did check The Press for the 13 May 1959 death but drew a blank. Schwede66 03:36, 17 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
I checked this out when there and your initial hunch was right, it was the 1959 one. For the record they don't have The Southland Times (and nothing on ODT), but they have an old biographies index of article clippings on microfiche and as luck would have it this guy was there. I have updated the article with the information from it. Kiwichris (talk) 02:23, 19 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sources for Convoy 22 edit

Hey Chris Gotten some new sources to back up the white nationalist, Christian fundamentalist and anti-Semitic motivations of the protestors in Wellington on the talk page. I hope it helps you. --222.153.41.232 (talk) 03:21, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Independent Reform/meta/shading edit

 Template:Independent Reform/meta/shading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:51, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:New Zealand Socialist Party/meta/shading edit

 Template:New Zealand Socialist Party/meta/shading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:53, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:The Opportunities Party/meta/shading edit

 Template:The Opportunities Party/meta/shading has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:21, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Barnstar for you edit

  The New Zealand Barnstar of National Merit
For your brilliant work on finding out who William Young (New Zealand politician) was. It was the shortest MP/MLC bio and nobody knew anything. Several people have been looking for the last few months. And you've single-handedly solved the mystery. Excellent work!
this WikiAward was given to Kiwichris by Schwede66 on 08:15, 19 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Country data New Zealand Labour Party pre 1970s edit

 Template:Country data New Zealand Labour Party pre 1970s has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:34, 17 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

ITN recognition for Stan Rodger edit

On 30 May 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Stan Rodger, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 09:46, 30 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wikimedia Aotearoa New Zealand Incorporated - Draft Strategy 2022-2025 Feedback Round edit

Kia ora,

The Committee of Wikimedia Aotearoa New Zealand Incorporated have developed a draft strategy for 2022 -2025. Feedback from members of the Wikimedia User Group of Aotearoa New Zealand that are New Zealanders or residents of Pacific islands without an established chapter is encouraged. The draft strategy can be read and commented on at this Google docs link  https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XoqMupo_5TlLs_6xuMU-3KU5_Lzks8unwFRo4QuDVM4/edit?usp=sharing  or in the discussion page of the Wikimedia User Group of Aotearoa New Zealand by adding a New Topic. https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Talk:Wikimedia_User_Group_of_Aotearoa_New_Zealand  The feedback round closes at midnight Sunday 9 October 2022. ~~~~ Einebillion (talk) 03:19, 20 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Syrian emigrants to New Zealand edit

 

A tag has been placed on Category:Syrian emigrants to New Zealand indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 01:12, 9 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

B&H World Series Cups edit

I've been looking at these and I note so have you. I was about to add 87−88 when I noted you had done it.

Is it worth co−ordinating if you plan to put up more in the next week or so? I make it that 88−89, 89−90, 90−91, 92−93, 94−95, 95−96, and 96−97 are to be done. I would not like to work on any one of these if you were doing the same.FieldOfWheat (talk) 21:28, 29 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Perhaps we could each take one end of the dates and meet in the middle? Kiwichris (talk) 06:27, 30 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Walter Nash edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Walter Nash you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Marshelec -- Marshelec (talk) 19:43, 1 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Walter Nash edit

The article Walter Nash you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Walter Nash and Talk:Walter Nash/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Marshelec -- Marshelec (talk) 02:23, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Walter Nash edit

The article Walter Nash you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Walter Nash for comments about the article, and Talk:Walter Nash/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Marshelec -- Marshelec (talk) 20:01, 10 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

  The New Zealand Barnstar of National Merit
Well done getting Walter Nash to Good Article status!
this WikiAward was given to Kiwichris by Jon (talk) on 23:05, 12 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Walter Nash edit

On 14 June 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Walter Nash, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Walter Nash's 14 years as New Zealand's minister of finance is the longest continuous time that anyone has ever served in that post? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Walter Nash. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Walter Nash), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 00:02, 14 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

1887–1891 Atkinson Ministry edit

Hi, in this edit you converted the Bassett references to {{sfn}} In the process you changed the reference from a 1969 edition published by Reed to a 1975 edition published by Auckland University Press. You didn't change any of the page numbers. Can you confirm that the page numbers are the same in both editions, and then can you correct the references in the text from {{sfn|Bassett|1969|p= to {{sfn|Bassett|1975|p= because at the moment none of them work and they put the article into Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors. Thanks, DuncanHill (talk) 09:28, 29 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for telling me. I've changed the reference to the 1969 edition. Kiwichris (talk) 09:58, 29 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. DuncanHill (talk) 10:00, 29 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Women's Rights Party edit

 

The article Women's Rights Party has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article does not meet the notability criteria. It does not have any substantial independent coverage. Without it there is not enough material to make an accurate informed article. Should such coverage become available, the article can be recreated.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HenryCrun15 (talk) 08:18, 8 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Women's Rights Party for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Women's Rights Party is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Women's Rights Party until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 04:59, 1 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

November 2023 edit

Introduction to contentious topics edit

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Fermiboson (talk) 09:12, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notice of neutral point of view noticeboard discussion edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. —Panamitsu (talk) 23:07, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Invitation to an in-person meetup in Mohua / Golden Bay edit

 
Golden Bay Air are holding some seats for us until 21 November

Thinking about your summer break? Think about joining other Wikipedians and Wikimedians in Golden Bay / Mohua! Details are on the meetup page. There's heaps of interesting stuff to work on e.g. the oldest extant waka or New Zealand's oldest ongoing legal case. Or you may spend your time taking photos and then upload them.

Golden Bay is hard to get to and the airline flying into Tākaka uses small planes, so we are holding some seats from and to Wellington and we are offering attendees a $200 travel subsidy to help with costs.

Be in touch with Schwede66 if this event interests you and you'd like to discuss logistics. Schwede66 09:14, 13 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Tim Costley edit

On 16 November 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tim Costley, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when he was in the Royal New Zealand Air Force, future politician Tim Costley starred in a YouTube video that joked about having sex with sheep? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tim Costley. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Tim Costley), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 00:03, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Moriarty Novel.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Moriarty Novel.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:32, 31 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Ryan Hamilton (New Zealand politician) edit

On 11 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ryan Hamilton (New Zealand politician), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a third of the MPs elected in the 2023 New Zealand election were new to Parliament, including Carlos Cheung, Grant McCallum, Suze Redmayne, Dana Kirkpatrick, Ryan Hamilton, James Meager, Greg Fleming, Vanessa Weenink, Mike Butterick, Katie Nimon, David MacLeod, Miles Anderson, Carl Bates, Rima Nakhle, Nancy Lu, Cushla Tangaere-Manuel, Reuben Davidson, Scott Willis, Darleen Tana, Takutai Moana Kemp (all pictured), Kahurangi Carter, Todd Stephenson, Laura Trask, Cameron Luxton, Tākuta Ferris, Mariameno Kapa-Kingi, Casey Costello, Jamie Arbuckle, and Tanya Unkovich? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Vanessa Weenink. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ryan Hamilton (New Zealand politician)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Schwede66 00:07, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Jamie Arbuckle edit

On 11 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Jamie Arbuckle, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a third of the MPs elected in the 2023 New Zealand election were new to Parliament, including Carlos Cheung, Grant McCallum, Suze Redmayne, Dana Kirkpatrick, Ryan Hamilton, James Meager, Greg Fleming, Vanessa Weenink, Mike Butterick, Katie Nimon, David MacLeod, Miles Anderson, Carl Bates, Rima Nakhle, Nancy Lu, Cushla Tangaere-Manuel, Reuben Davidson, Scott Willis, Darleen Tana, Takutai Moana Kemp (all pictured), Kahurangi Carter, Todd Stephenson, Laura Trask, Cameron Luxton, Tākuta Ferris, Mariameno Kapa-Kingi, Casey Costello, Jamie Arbuckle, and Tanya Unkovich? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Vanessa Weenink. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Jamie Arbuckle), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Schwede66 00:14, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Casey Costello edit

On 11 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Casey Costello, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a third of the MPs elected in the 2023 New Zealand election were new to Parliament, including Carlos Cheung, Grant McCallum, Suze Redmayne, Dana Kirkpatrick, Ryan Hamilton, James Meager, Greg Fleming, Vanessa Weenink, Mike Butterick, Katie Nimon, David MacLeod, Miles Anderson, Carl Bates, Rima Nakhle, Nancy Lu, Cushla Tangaere-Manuel, Reuben Davidson, Scott Willis, Darleen Tana, Takutai Moana Kemp (all pictured), Kahurangi Carter, Todd Stephenson, Laura Trask, Cameron Luxton, Tākuta Ferris, Mariameno Kapa-Kingi, Casey Costello, Jamie Arbuckle, and Tanya Unkovich? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Vanessa Weenink. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Casey Costello), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Schwede66 00:14, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Reuben Davidson edit

On 11 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Reuben Davidson, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a third of the MPs elected in the 2023 New Zealand election were new to Parliament, including Carlos Cheung, Grant McCallum, Suze Redmayne, Dana Kirkpatrick, Ryan Hamilton, James Meager, Greg Fleming, Vanessa Weenink, Mike Butterick, Katie Nimon, David MacLeod, Miles Anderson, Carl Bates, Rima Nakhle, Nancy Lu, Cushla Tangaere-Manuel, Reuben Davidson, Scott Willis, Darleen Tana, Takutai Moana Kemp (all pictured), Kahurangi Carter, Todd Stephenson, Laura Trask, Cameron Luxton, Tākuta Ferris, Mariameno Kapa-Kingi, Casey Costello, Jamie Arbuckle, and Tanya Unkovich? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Vanessa Weenink. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Reuben Davidson), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Schwede66 00:15, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Cushla Tangaere-Manuel edit

On 11 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cushla Tangaere-Manuel, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that a third of the MPs elected in the 2023 New Zealand election were new to Parliament, including Carlos Cheung, Grant McCallum, Suze Redmayne, Dana Kirkpatrick, Ryan Hamilton, James Meager, Greg Fleming, Vanessa Weenink, Mike Butterick, Katie Nimon, David MacLeod, Miles Anderson, Carl Bates, Rima Nakhle, Nancy Lu, Cushla Tangaere-Manuel, Reuben Davidson, Scott Willis, Darleen Tana, Takutai Moana Kemp (all pictured), Kahurangi Carter, Todd Stephenson, Laura Trask, Cameron Luxton, Tākuta Ferris, Mariameno Kapa-Kingi, Casey Costello, Jamie Arbuckle, and Tanya Unkovich? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Vanessa Weenink. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Cushla Tangaere-Manuel), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Schwede66 00:16, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

ITN recognition for Mike Procter edit

On 20 February 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Mike Procter, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 02:57, 20 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

March 2024 GAN backlog drive edit

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
 
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
  • On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

ITN recognition for Jonathan Hunt (New Zealand politician) edit

On 8 March 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Jonathan Hunt (New Zealand politician), which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 23:09, 8 March 2024 (UTC)Reply