Your draft article, Draft:The Big Sick

edit
 

Hello, Captain Assassin!. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "The Big Sick".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 14:36, 1 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

4th GA Cup - Round 2

edit
WikiProject Good Articles's 2016-2017 GA Cup
 

Greetings, GA Cup competitors!

December 29th marked the end of the first round, after it was extended from its previously scheduled conclusion at the end of November. Because of the smaller pool of contestants this year, it was decided to keep sign-ups open throughout the month of December.

This extension proved to be very helpful as we saw that more users signed up and completed many reviews. Krishna Chaitanya Velaga earned an impressive 402 points, followed by Cartoon network freak with a close 338 points. Shearonink who signed up after our extension was in third with 170 points.

We had a rule clarification in Round 1 which was that many articles were being passed with blatant copyright violations and plagarism occurring in the articles. Thus, the judges have concluded that if an article is passed even if it has a copyright violation/plagarism, we will not provide points for that article as it wouldn't be considered a "complete review" under the scoring rules.

In the end, 94 articles were reviewed by 14 users who will all advance to Round 2. The judges had planned on having 16 contestants advance but since only 14 did, we are changing the pools in this round. We will be having 2 pools of 3 and 2 pools of 4 in Round 2, with the top 2 in each pool advancing to Round 3 as well as the top participant ("9th place") of all remaining competitors. Round 2 will begin on January 1 at 00:00:00 UTC and will end on January 29 at 23:59:59 UTC. Information about Round 2 and the pools can be found here.

Cheers from 3family6, Figureskatingfan, Jaguar, MrWooHoo, and Zwerg Nase!

To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletters, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:21, 1 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 1, 2017)

edit
 
Some of the Aeolian Islands
Hello, Captain Assassin!.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Aeolian Islands

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Tectonics • Helena Bergström


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:07, 2 January 2017 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Your draft article, Draft:Africa (upcoming film)

edit
 

Hello, Captain Assassin!. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Africa".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Zupotachyon Ping me (talkcontribs) 03:09, 3 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Action Man (film)

edit
 

Hello, Captain Assassin!. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Action Man".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Zupotachyon Ping me (talkcontribs) 00:44, 5 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Rauf Klasra

edit
 

The article Rauf Klasra has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per cited sources, the subject has not received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. It fails to pass the notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Justice007 (talk) 10:13, 5 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Rauf Klasra for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rauf Klasra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rauf Klasra (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Justice007 (talk) 12:47, 5 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Allegiant – Part 1

edit
 

Hello, Captain Assassin!. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Allegiant – Part 1".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 17:56, 6 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Allegiant – Part 2

edit
 

Hello, Captain Assassin!. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Allegiant – Part 2".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 17:57, 6 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:The Jungle Book (2015 film)

edit
 

Hello, Captain Assassin!. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "The Jungle Book".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 17:59, 6 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:The Sandman (film)

edit
 

Hello, Captain Assassin!. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "The Sandman".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 18:00, 6 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 2, 2017)

edit
 
Professional audio – pictured is a portable setup of various live audio production and recording equipment
Hello, Captain Assassin!.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Professional audio

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Aeolian Islands • Tectonics


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:08, 9 January 2017 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

ethnicelebs.com is not a reliable source

edit

Hi Captain Assassin!. I noticed that you added ethnicelebs.com as a reference in Charlie Plummer. From the RSN discussions and their own disclaimer, this isn't a reliable source. I've gone ahead and removed it. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 19:29, 10 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Oasis Golf and Aqua Resort for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oasis Golf and Aqua Resort is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oasis Golf and Aqua Resort until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rogermx (talk) 21:15, 10 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Get It While You Can

edit
 

Hello, Captain Assassin!. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Get It While You Can".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 01:21, 12 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Magic City (film)

edit
 

Hello, Captain Assassin!. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Magic City".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 01:31, 12 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Caliber (film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Caliber (film). Since you had some involvement with the Caliber (film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 16:38, 12 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

American Darling listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect American Darling. Since you had some involvement with the American Darling redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 22:13, 13 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Twin Earths (film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Twin Earths (film). Since you had some involvement with the Twin Earths (film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 22:16, 13 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Legacy of Secrecy (2013 film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Legacy of Secrecy (2013 film). Since you had some involvement with the Legacy of Secrecy (2013 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 22:23, 13 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

The Litigators (film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Litigators (film). Since you had some involvement with the The Litigators (film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 22:53, 13 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK

edit

  Hello! Your submission of Molly's Game at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! North America1000 09:56, 14 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK

edit

  Hello! Your submission of Lizzie (2017 film) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! North America1000 12:22, 14 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Ferdinand (film)

edit

You kinda seemed to have forgotten about this draft that you created, Draft:Ferdinand (film). I'm going to help you by leaving a link to the draft so you can further develop it. Draft:Ferdinand (film) Superchunk22 (talk) 16:53, 15 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 3, 2017)

edit
 
Some of the human organs
Hello, Captain Assassin!.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Organ (anatomy)

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Professional audio • Aeolian Islands


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:08, 16 January 2017 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Alexandra Bartee listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Alexandra Bartee. Since you had some involvement with the Alexandra Bartee redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 20:20, 17 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Zap Gun! listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Zap Gun!. Since you had some involvement with the Zap Gun! redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 21:45, 19 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

The Grackle (film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Grackle (film). Since you had some involvement with the The Grackle (film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 18:56, 20 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Contractors (film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Contractors (film). Since you had some involvement with the Contractors (film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 19:01, 20 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 4, 2017)

edit
 
Ghanaian nationalists celebrating the 50th anniversary of national independence in 2007
Hello, Captain Assassin!.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

African nationalism

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Organ (anatomy) • Professional audio


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:09, 23 January 2017 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

dear captain assassin stop deleting my minions 2 page and links please i worked for 40 minutes to make them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.40.165.255 (talk) 09:07, 26 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Lizzie (2017 film)

edit

On 29 January 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lizzie (2017 film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Chloë Sevigny portrays the accused ax-murderer Lizzie Borden in the upcoming film Lizzie? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lizzie (2017 film). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Lizzie (2017 film)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Vanamonde (talk) 21:39, 29 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 5, 2017)

edit
Hello, Captain Assassin!.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Nvidia Shadowplay

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: African nationalism • Organ (anatomy)


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:07, 30 January 2017 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

DYK for The Wall (2017 film)

edit

On 30 January 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Wall (2017 film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Dwain Worrell's debut screenplay The Wall is also Amazon Studios' first original spec script? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Wall (2017 film). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, The Wall (2017 film)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 09:55, 30 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Carlos Saldanha

edit

 Template:Carlos Saldanha has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 20:39, 31 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Carlos Saldanha

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Template:Carlos Saldanha, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 20:40, 31 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Get Out (film) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Get Out (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Get Out (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. L3X1 My Complaint Desk 20:35, 1 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Was closed as Snow Keep by admins. They said I had not enough grounds.L3X1 My Complaint Desk 13:47, 2 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

4th GA Cup - Round 3

edit
WikiProject Good Articles's 2016 GA Cup - Round 3
 

Hello, GA Cup competitors!

Sunday saw the end of Round 2. Shearonink took out Round 2 with an amazing score of 499. In second place, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga earned an astounding 236 points, and in third place, Cartoon network freak received 136 points. Originally, we had plans for one wild card for 9th place, however it appears that both Chris troutman and J Milburn were tied for 9th place. Therefore, we have decided to have both advance to Round 3.

In Round 2, 91 reviews were completed! At the beginning of this GA Cup, the longest wait was over 7 months; at the end of Round 2, the longest wait had decreased to a little over 6 months. It's clear that we continue to make a difference at GAN and throughout Wikipedia, something we should all be proud of. Thanks to all our competitors for helping to make the GA Cup a continued success, and for your part in helping other editors improve articles. We hope to see all remaining users fighting it out in Round 3 so we can keep decreasing the backlog.

To qualify for the third round, contestants had to earn the two highest scores in each of the four pools in Round 2; plus, one wildcard. For Round 3, users were placed in 3 random pools of 3. To qualify for the Final of the 3rd Annual GA Cup, the top user in each pool will progress, and there will also be one wildcard. This means that the participant who comes in 4th place (all pools combined) will also move on. Round 3 has already started and will end on February 26 at 23:59:59 UTC. Information about Round 3 and the pools can be found here.

Also, we'd like to announce the departure of judge Zwerg Nase. We thank him for all his hardwork and hope to see him back in the future.

Good luck and have fun!

Cheers from Figureskatingfan, 3family6, Jaguar, and MrWooHoo.

To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:10, 1 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Rosaline (film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rosaline (film). Since you had some involvement with the Rosaline (film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 21:25, 4 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

The Story of Dr. Seuss listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Story of Dr. Seuss. Since you had some involvement with the The Story of Dr. Seuss redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 21:54, 4 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

redirect creation

edit

Why would you create a redirect like Yahya Abdul-Mateen II? Chris Troutman (talk) 06:07, 5 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Chris troutman: No worries. I'm going to convert it into the article soon. --Captain Assassin! «TCG» 07:27, 5 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
No, that doesn't answer my question. I understand why people create articles but I'm trying to understand why you create redirects like that. Chris Troutman (talk) 15:20, 5 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
Sometimes people search actors who don't have articles, so it would redirect the readers to their notable credits (films or television shows). And second, I intended to create them soon. --Captain Assassin! «TCG» 13:00, 6 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

The Legends of the Underzoo listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Legends of the Underzoo. Since you had some involvement with the The Legends of the Underzoo redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 20:32, 5 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 6, 2017)

edit
 
A high school in Malaysia
Hello, Captain Assassin!.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Secondary school

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Nvidia Shadowplay • African nationalism


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:08, 6 February 2017 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Speedy deletion nomination of Faith Wood-Blagrove

edit

Hello Captain Assassin!,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Faith Wood-Blagrove for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

DrStrauss talk 11:16, 6 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of Draft:Hasan Ahmed (actor)

edit

  Draft:Hasan Ahmed (actor), a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Hasan Ahmed (actor) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Hasan Ahmed (actor) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. MB 16:26, 7 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Faran Model College Jhang logo.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Faran Model College Jhang logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 8 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK approved,

edit

Hello, Captain,

Your DYK nomination has been reviewed and approved. Congratulations! I hope you draw plenty of readers.

Georgejdorner (talk) 14:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hellow Captain, you can creted Draft:Star Worlds Episode XXXIVE=MC2: The Force Awakens the Last Jedi Who Went Rogue?. Bruno Rene Vargas (talk) 02:53, 10 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Star Worlds Episode XXXIVE=MC2: The Force Awakens the Last Jedi Who Went Rogue

edit

Hellow Captain, you can creted Draft:Star Worlds Episode XXXIVE=MC2: The Force Awakens the Last Jedi Who Went Rogue?. Bruno Rene Vargas (talk) 02:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Horse Soldiers (film)

edit

  Hello! Your submission of Horse Soldiers (film) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 17:29, 10 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Citizen Hughes: The Power, the Money, and the Madness listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Citizen Hughes: The Power, the Money, and the Madness. Since you had some involvement with the Citizen Hughes: The Power, the Money, and the Madness redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 23:08, 11 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

The Man on Carrion Road (2014 film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Man on Carrion Road (2014 film). Since you had some involvement with the The Man on Carrion Road (2014 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 23:14, 11 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Donald Duck (film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Donald Duck (film). Since you had some involvement with the Donald Duck (film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 03:54, 12 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Hello! Your submission of LAbyrinth (2017 film) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Mindmatrix 15:22, 12 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 7, 2017)

edit
 
The Sun and planets of the Solar System (distances not to scale) are examples of astronomical objects.
Hello, Captain Assassin!.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Astronomical object

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Secondary school • Nvidia Shadowplay


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:08, 13 February 2017 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Harker (film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Harker (film). Since you had some involvement with the Harker (film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 02:35, 13 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Age of Reptiles (film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Age of Reptiles (film). Since you had some involvement with the Age of Reptiles (film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 02:50, 13 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Violent Talent (film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Violent Talent (film). Since you had some involvement with the Violent Talent (film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 02:57, 13 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Sydney Unplugged listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sydney Unplugged. Since you had some involvement with the Sydney Unplugged redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 02:13, 17 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

The Long Green Shore (film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Long Green Shore (film). Since you had some involvement with the The Long Green Shore (film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 02:17, 17 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Memorial Day (2014 film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Memorial Day (2014 film). Since you had some involvement with the Memorial Day (2014 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 02:21, 17 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Smallfoot (2016 film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Smallfoot (2016 film). Since you had some involvement with the Smallfoot (2016 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 20:44, 19 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Rango 2 listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rango 2. Since you had some involvement with the Rango 2 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 20:54, 19 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Killer Crow (2015 film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Killer Crow (2015 film). Since you had some involvement with the Killer Crow (2015 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 21:08, 19 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

The Caves of Steel (film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Caves of Steel (film). Since you had some involvement with the The Caves of Steel (film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 21:21, 19 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Married and Cheating listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Married and Cheating. Since you had some involvement with the Married and Cheating redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 23:25, 19 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 8, 2017)

edit
 
Växjö surrounded by lakes, as seen from an airplane
Hello, Captain Assassin!.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Växjö

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Astronomical object • Secondary school


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:08, 20 February 2017 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Murder Mystery (film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Murder Mystery (film). Since you had some involvement with the Murder Mystery (film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 02:33, 20 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

The Greys (2014 film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Greys (2014 film). Since you had some involvement with the The Greys (2014 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 02:40, 20 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Guild of Copy Editors February 2017 News

edit
Guild of Copy Editors February 2017 News
 

 

Hello everyone, and welcome to the February 2017 GOCE newsletter. The Guild has been busy since the last time your coordinators sent out a newsletter!

December blitz: This one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 11 through 17 December; the themes were Requests and eliminating the November 2015 backlog. Of the 14 editors who signed up, nine editors completed 29 articles. Barnstars and rollover totals are located here. Thanks to all who took part.

January drive: The January drive was a great success. We set out to remove December 2015 and January and February 2016 from our backlog (195 articles), and by 22 January we had cleared those and had to add a third month (March 2016). At the end of the month we had almost cleared out that last month as well, for a total of 180 old articles removed from the backlog! We reduced our overall backlog by 337 articles, to a low of 1,465 articles, our second-lowest month-end total ever. We also handled all of the remaining requests from December 2016. Officially, 19 editors recorded 337 copy edits (over 679,000 words).

February blitz: The one-week February blitz, focusing on the remaining March 2016 backlog and January 2017 requests, ran from 12 to 18 February. Seven editors reduced the total in those two backlog segments from 32 to 10 articles, leaving us in good shape going in to the March drive.

Coordinator elections for the first half of 2017: In December, coordinators for the first half of 2017 were elected. Jonesey95 stepped aside as lead coordinator, remaining as coordinator and allowing Miniapolis to be the lead, and Tdslk and Corinne returned as coordinators. Thanks to all who participated!

Speaking of coordinators, congratulations to Jonesey95 on their well-deserved induction into the Guild of Copy Editors Hall of Fame. The plaque reads: "For dedicated service as lead coordinator (2014, 1 July – 31 December 2015 and all of 2016) and coordinator (1 January – 30 June 2015 and 1 January – 30 June 2017); exceptional template-creation work (considerably streamlining project administration), and their emphasis on keeping the GOCE a drama-free zone."

Housekeeping note: We do not send a newsletter before every drive or blitz. To have a better chance of knowing when the next event will start, add the GOCE's message box to your watchlist.

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators: Miniapolis, Jonesey95, Corinne and Tdslk.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:20, 20 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Beast (film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Beast (film). Since you had some involvement with the Beast (film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 03:40, 21 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Manhunt (2015 film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Manhunt (2015 film). Since you had some involvement with the Manhunt (2015 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 03:43, 21 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Stretch Armstrong (2014 film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Stretch Armstrong (2014 film). Since you had some involvement with the Stretch Armstrong (2014 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 03:46, 21 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Escape from New York (2015 film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Escape from New York (2015 film). Since you had some involvement with the Escape from New York (2015 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 01:17, 22 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Lore (2015 film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lore (2015 film). Since you had some involvement with the Lore (2015 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 01:22, 22 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Inside the Machine (2014 film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Inside the Machine (2014 film). Since you had some involvement with the Inside the Machine (2014 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 01:28, 22 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Close Enough listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Close Enough. Since you had some involvement with the Close Enough redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 01:45, 22 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

John Ledger (film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect John Ledger (film). Since you had some involvement with the John Ledger (film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 01:43, 23 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

John Ledger listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect John Ledger. Since you had some involvement with the John Ledger redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 01:44, 23 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Event 15 (film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Event 15 (film). Since you had some involvement with the Event 15 (film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 02:09, 23 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Death Wish (2015 film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Death Wish (2015 film). Since you had some involvement with the Death Wish (2015 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 02:14, 23 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Horse Soldiers (film)

edit

On 23 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Horse Soldiers (film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the upcoming film Horse Soldiers is Nicolai Fuglsig's feature film directorial debut? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Horse Soldiers (film). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Horse Soldiers (film)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 12:02, 23 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

I don't think we should redirect actor links to film articles. It is inappropriate to tie them to just one film. They could easily be in a second film and still not meet notability guidelines. Let's keep actor links red until a stand-alone article can be created for the person. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 15:21, 24 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Aquaman (film)

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Aquaman (film), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TJRC (talk) 21:03, 24 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Please help for speedy deletion contest for this page Islamway.net Albicelestes (talk) 22:42, 26 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 9, 2017)

edit
 
Parallel goods traders queuing outside Sheung Shui Station in Hong Kong
Hello, Captain Assassin!.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Grey market

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Växjö • Astronomical object


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:08, 27 February 2017 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Proposed deletion of The Devil You Know (TV pilot)

edit
 

The article The Devil You Know (TV pilot) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article devoted to TV pilot – TV pilots are generally not considered notable except under exceptional circumstances, as per WP:TVSHOW. Souring consisting of nothing but casting notices do not demonstrate notability for TV pilots.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --IJBall (contribstalk) 08:08, 28 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

March 2017 WikiCup newsletter

edit

And so ends the first round of the competition, with 4 points required to qualify for round 2. It would have been 5 points, but when a late entrant was permitted to join the contest in February, a promise was made that his inclusion would not result in the exclusion of any other competitor. To achieve this, the six entrants that had the lowest positive score of 4 points have been added to the 64 people who otherwise would have qualified. As a result, some of the groups have nine contestants rather than eight. Our top four scorers in round 1 were:

  •   Cas Liber, last year's winner, led the field with two featured articles on birds and a total score of 674.
  •   Iry-Hor, a WikiCup newcomer, came next with a featured article, a good article and a tally of 282 bonus points for a score of 517. All these points came from the article Nyuserre Ini, an Ancient Egyptian pharaoh,
  •   1989, another WikiCup newcomer, was in joint third place at 240. 1989 has claimed points for two featured lists and one good article relating to anime and comedy series, all of which were awarded bonus points.
  •   Peacemaker67 shared third place with five good articles and thirteen good article reviews, mostly on naval vessels. He is also new to the competition.

The largest number of DYKs have been submitted by Vivvt and The C of E, who each claimed for seven, and MBlaze Lightning achieved eight articles at ITN. Carbrera and Peacemaker67 each claimed for five GAs and Krishna Chaitanya Velaga was well out in front for GARs, having reviewed 32. No featured pictures, featured topics or good topics yet, but we have achieved three featured articles and a splendid total of fifty good articles.

So, on to the second round. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 13:52, 1 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of LAbyrinth (2017 film)

edit

  Hello! Your submission of LAbyrinth (2017 film) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 22:52, 2 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 10, 2017)

edit
Hello, Captain Assassin!.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Plastic explosive

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Grey market • Växjö


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:10, 6 March 2017 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Your draft article, Draft:Five Nights at Freddy's (film)

edit
 

Hello, Captain Assassin!. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Five Nights at Freddy's".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. GamerPro64 18:03, 6 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

4th GA Cup - The Final

edit
WikiProject Good Articles's 2016 GA Cup - Final
 

Hello, GA Cup competitors!

Sunday, February 26 saw the end of Round 3. Shearonink finished in first with 616 points, which is more than the point totals for all the other competitors combined! In second place, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga earned an impressive 152 points, followed by Sturmvogel_66 in third with 111 points. Chris troutman and Kees08 each received a wild-card and were able to advance to the Final Round. There was a major error on the part of the judges, and initially, 8 users were advanced instead of 5. This has been corrected, and we sincerely apologize for this confusion.

In Round 3, 71 reviews were completed! At the beginning of this GA Cup, the longest wait was over 7 months; at the end of Round 3, the longest wait is still holding steady at a little over 6 months, the same as for the previous round. By the end of all three Rounds, the total number of nominations increased slightly - this suggests that users are more willing to nominate, knowing that their articles will be reviewed. We hope to see all remaining users fighting it out in the Final so we can keep tackling the backlog.

In the Final Round, the user with the highest score will be the winner. The Final has already started and will end on March 31st at 23:59:59 UTC. Information about Finals and the pools can be found here.

Good luck and have fun!

Cheers from Figureskatingfan, 3family6, Jaguar, and MrWooHoo.

To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletters, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:32, 6 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of The Devil You Know (TV pilot) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Devil You Know (TV pilot) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Devil You Know (TV pilot) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --IJBall (contribstalk) 01:06, 7 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Cadet College Jhang

edit
 

The article Cadet College Jhang has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

PROD log

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Enaya Afzal.....📝 (Talk) 17:11, 8 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Chenab College, Chiniot

edit
 

The article Chenab College, Chiniot has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

PROD log

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Enaya Afzal.....📝 (Talk) 17:12, 8 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Daily Nai Baat

edit
 

The article Daily Nai Baat has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

PROD log

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Enaya Afzal.....📝 (Talk) 17:23, 8 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

The Ballad of Pablo Escobar (film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Ballad of Pablo Escobar (film). Since you had some involvement with the The Ballad of Pablo Escobar (film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 01:13, 10 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

By Virtue Fall (film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect By Virtue Fall (film). Since you had some involvement with the By Virtue Fall (film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 01:16, 10 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

The Key Man (2014 film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Key Man (2014 film). Since you had some involvement with the The Key Man (2014 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 01:20, 10 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Seven Years, Three Days (2014 film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Seven Years, Three Days (2014 film). Since you had some involvement with the Seven Years, Three Days (2014 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 01:23, 10 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Significance (film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Significance (film). Since you had some involvement with the Significance (film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 01:31, 10 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of LAbyrinth (2017 film)

edit

  Hello! Your submission of LAbyrinth (2017 film) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 02:16, 10 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Final call for QPQ, since you used the one you submitted in another nomination. Thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 02:16, 10 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Betty Gabriel

edit
 

The article Betty Gabriel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Neither role is significant, and no reliable sources. Doesn't meet WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 18:18, 12 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 11, 2017)

edit
Hello, Captain Assassin!.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Tandoori chicken

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Plastic explosive • Grey market


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:19, 13 March 2017 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Nomination of Betty Gabriel for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Betty Gabriel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betty Gabriel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 21:07, 13 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Lore (future film based on comic) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lore (future film based on comic). Since you had some involvement with the Lore (future film based on comic) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 00:20, 14 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Almost Heroes (2014 film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Almost Heroes (2014 film). Since you had some involvement with the Almost Heroes (2014 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 22:10, 14 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Earthseed (film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Earthseed (film). Since you had some involvement with the Earthseed (film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 22:21, 14 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK for LAbyrinth (2017 film)

edit

On 16 March 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article LAbyrinth (2017 film), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in the upcoming film LAbyrinth, Johnny Depp portrays a detective investigating the murders of Tupac Shakur and The Notorious B.I.G.? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/LAbyrinth (2017 film). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, LAbyrinth (2017 film)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Mifter (talk) 12:02, 16 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 12, 2017)

edit
 
The long-legged buzzard is an example of a bird of prey.
Hello, Captain Assassin!.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Bird of prey

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Tandoori chicken • Plastic explosive


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:08, 20 March 2017 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Doc Savage (2014 film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Doc Savage (2014 film). Since you had some involvement with the Doc Savage (2014 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 02:01, 20 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Daredevil (2015 film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Daredevil (2015 film). Since you had some involvement with the Daredevil (2015 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 02:14, 20 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Concrete Island (2014 film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Concrete Island (2014 film). Since you had some involvement with the Concrete Island (2014 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 02:21, 20 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Club Ufone

edit
 

The article Club Ufone has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This social networking site was never notable. Now it is offline. I suggest to redirect to Ufone.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GreenCricket (talk) 11:33, 21 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Club Ufone for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Club Ufone is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Club Ufone until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GreenCricket (talk) 11:34, 21 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

1950 (film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 1950 (film). Since you had some involvement with the 1950 (film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 01:44, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Bullet Run (film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bullet Run (film). Since you had some involvement with the Bullet Run (film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 01:46, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Asteroids (film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Asteroids (film). Since you had some involvement with the Asteroids (film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 01:59, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Amped (film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Amped (film). Since you had some involvement with the Amped (film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 02:38, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Amped (2014 film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Amped (2014 film). Since you had some involvement with the Amped (2014 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 02:38, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Candy Land (2014 film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Candy Land (2014 film). Since you had some involvement with the Candy Land (2014 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 02:40, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Avatar 3

edit
 

Hello, Captain Assassin!. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Avatar 3".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 07:47, 24 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

This week's article for improvement (week 13, 2017)

edit
 
The Czech philosopher Radovan Richta (1924–1983) originated the theory of technological evolution.
Hello, Captain Assassin!.

The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection:

Technological evolution

Please be bold and help to improve this article!


Previous selections: Bird of prey • Tandoori chicken


Get involved with the TAFI project. You can: Nominate an article • Review nominations


Posted by: MusikBot talk 00:08, 27 March 2017 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject TAFI • Opt-out instructionsReply

Our Kind of Traitor (2014 film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Our Kind of Traitor (2014 film). Since you had some involvement with the Our Kind of Traitor (2014 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 00:34, 28 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Little Boy (2013 film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Little Boy (2013 film). Since you had some involvement with the Little Boy (2013 film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 00:42, 28 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

The Grimm Legacy (film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect The Grimm Legacy (film). Since you had some involvement with the The Grimm Legacy (film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 00:07, 30 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Trollhunters (film) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Trollhunters (film). Since you had some involvement with the Trollhunters (film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 00:24, 30 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Captain Underpants (TV series) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Captain Underpants (TV series). Since you had some involvement with the Captain Underpants (TV series) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 02:05, 30 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Relanxious (actor) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Relanxious (actor). Since you had some involvement with the Relanxious (actor) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 01:33, 31 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Club Ufone logo.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Club Ufone logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 31 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Club Ufone screenshot.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Club Ufone screenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:11, 31 March 2017 (UTC)Reply