Anton Webern

Anton Friedrich Wilhelm von Webern (3 December 1883 – 15 September 1945), better known as Anton Webern[a] (German: [ˈantoːn ˈveːbɐn] (listen)), was an Austrian composer and conductor whose music was among the most radical of its milieu in its sheer concision, even aphorism, and steadfast embrace of then novel atonal and twelve-tone techniques. With his mentor Arnold Schoenberg and his colleague Alban Berg, Webern was at the core of those within the broader circle of the Second Viennese School.[b]

Anton Webern
Webern in Stettin, October 1912
Webern in Stettin, October 1912
Born3 December 1883
Vienna, Austria
Died15 September 1945(1945-09-15) (aged 61)
Mittersill, Austria
Occupation
  • Composer
  • conductor
Notable workList of compositions
Signature
Anton Webern transparent signature bw.png

Little known in the earlier part of his life, mostly as a student and follower of Schoenberg, but also as a peripatetic and often unhappy theater music director with a mixed reputation as an exacting conductor, Webern came to some prominence and increasingly high regard as a vocal coach, choirmaster, conductor, and teacher[c] during Red Vienna. With Schoenberg away at the Prussian Academy of Arts (and with the benefit of a publication agreement secured through Universal Edition), Webern began writing music of increasing confidence, independence, and scale during the latter half of the 1920s—his mature chamber and orchestral works, music that, perhaps more than his earlier expressionist works, would later decisively influence a generation of composers. Amid Austrofascism, Nazism, and World War II, Webern remained nevertheless committed to taking the "path to the new music", as he styled it in a series of private lectures delivered in 1932–1933 (but unpublished until 1960). He continued writing some of his most mature and later celebrated music while increasingly ostracized from official musical life as a "cultural Bolshevist", taking occasional copyist jobs from his publisher as he lost students and his conducting career.

Following his death shortly after World War II, Webern became more widely celebrated and influential than ever before, albeit initially through pedagogy often lacking full context, and the thread of his work was taken by composers in directions far beyond any residual post-Romanticism and expressionism that had remained in his style. His gradual innovations in schematic organization of pitch, rhythm, register, timbre, dynamics, articulation, and melodic contour; his later adaptation and generalization of imitative contrapuntal techniques such as canon and fugue; and his inclination toward athematicism, abstraction, and lyricism variously informed and oriented European, typically serial or avant-garde composers such as Olivier Messiaen, Pierre Boulez, Karlheinz Stockhausen, Luigi Nono, Bruno Maderna, Henri Pousseur, Bernd Alois Zimmermann, and György Ligeti. Later, both Brian Ferneyhough and Helmut Lachenmann also found much in Webern on the way to complexity in the case of the former and musique concrète instrumentale in the case of the latter, engaging particularly with his atonal works by some contrast to earlier post-Webernism. Less so in the United States, his music attracted the interest of Elliott Carter and Aaron Copland, whose critical ambivalence was marked by a certain enthusiasm and fascination nonetheless;[3] Milton Babbitt, who ultimately derived more inspiration from Schoenberg's twelve-tone practice than that of Webern; and particularly Igor Stravinsky, to whom it was very fruitfully reintroduced by Robert Craft, and without which Stravinsky's late works might have taken different shape. Indeed, Stravinsky staked his contract with Columbia Records to see that Webern's "complete" music was first both recorded and widely distributed.[4] Among the more interdisciplinary New York School, John Cage and Morton Feldman both cited the staggering effect of its sound on their own music, first meeting at a performance of the Symphony, Op. 21, and even singing the praises of Christian Wolff distinctly as "our Webern". A richer and more historically informed understanding of Webern and his music began to emerge during the latter half of the 20th century onward in the work of Kathryn Bailey Puffett, Julian Johnson, Felix Meyer, and Anne Shreffler as archivists, biographers, and musicologists, most importantly Hans and Rosaleen Moldenhauer, gained access to sketches, letters, lectures, audio recordings, and other articles of or associated with Webern's estate.

BiographyEdit

1883–1918: Youth, education, and war in Austria-HungaryEdit

 
Schloss Preglhof, Webern's childhood home, in Oberdorf

Webern was born in Vienna, then in Austria-Hungary. He was the only surviving son of Carl von Webern, a descendent of minor nobility [de], high-ranking civil servant, mining engineer,[5] and owner of the Lamprechtsberg copper mine in the Koralpe; and Amalie (née Geer), a competent pianist, accomplished singer, and possibly the only obvious source of the future composer's talent.[6]

 
A brick barn in a field of wildflowers on the Preglhof estate[7]

He lived in Graz and Klagenfurt for much of his youth. But his distinct and lasting sense of Heimat was shaped by readings of Peter Rosegger;[8] and moreover by frequent and extended retreats with his parents, sisters, and cousins to his family's country estate, the Preglhof, which Webern's father had inherited upon the death of Webern's grandfather in 1889.[9]

 
Family grave at the cemetery in Schwabegg, on a meander spur of the Drava

Webern memorialized the Preglhof in a diary poem "An der Preglhof" and in the tone poem Im Sommerwind (1904), both after Bruno Wille's idyll. Once Webern's father sold the estate in 1912,[10] Webern referred to it nostalgically as a "lost paradise".[11] He continued to revisit the Preglhof,[12] the family grave at the cemetery in Schwabegg, and the surrounding landscape for the rest of his life;[13] and he clearly associated the area, which he took as his home, very closely with the memory of his mother Amelie, who had died in 1906 and whose loss also profoundly affected Webern for decades.[14]

In 1902, Webern began attending classes at Vienna University. There he studied musicology with Guido Adler, writing his thesis on the Choralis Constantinus of Heinrich Isaac. This interest in early music would greatly influence his compositional technique in later years, especially in terms of his use of palindromic form on both the micro- and macro-scale and the economical use of musical materials.

Webern's cousin Ernst Dietz, an art historian studying in Graz, may have introduced Webern to the work of the painters Arnold Böcklin and Giovanni Segantini, whom Webern came to admire.[15] Segantini's work was a likely inspiration for Webern's 1905 single-movement string quartet.[16]

 
Webern, 1912

Young Webern was enthusiastic about the music of Ludwig van Beethoven, Franz Liszt, Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, Franz Schubert ("so genuinely Viennese"), Hugo Wolf, and Richard Wagner, visiting Bayreuth in 1902. He also enjoyed the music of Hector Berlioz and Georges Bizet. In 1903, besides describing some of Alexander Scriabin's music as "languishing junk," Webern wrote of Robert Schumann's Symphony No. 4 that it was "boring," that Carl Maria von Weber's Konzertstück in F minor was passé, and that he found Johannes Brahms's Symphony No. 3 (which struck Eduard Hanslick as "artistically the most nearly perfect") "cold and without particular inspiration, ... badly orchestrated—grey on grey."[17] Writing about an all-Russian concert program, Webern praised one of Alexander Glazunov's symphonies as "not particularly Russian" in contrast to some of Nikolai Rimsky-Korsakov's music, of which he thought less.[17][d]

In 1904, he approached Hans Pfitzner for composition lessons but left angrily after hearing criticism of Gustav Mahler and Richard Strauss.[19] It may have been at Guido Adler's advice that he paid Schoenberg for composition lessons. Webern progressed quickly under Schoenberg's tutelage, publishing his Passacaglia, Op. 1, as his graduation piece in 1908. He also met Berg, then another of Schoenberg's pupils. These two relationships would be the most important in his life in shaping his own musical direction.

With the help of friends and colleagues, Webern later began working peripatetically as a conductor and musical coach in various towns and cities, among them Ischl, Teplitz (now Teplice, Czech Republic), Danzig (now Gdańsk, Poland), Stettin (now Szczecin, Poland), and Prague, before finally moving back to Vienna. He conducted some of Debussy's music in 1911, having written rapturously to Schoenberg about Claude Debussy's opera Pelléas et Mélisande in 1908.

1918–1934: Rise in Red ViennaEdit

 
Webern, 1927, portrait by Georg Fayer

From 1918 to 1921, Webern helped organize and operate the Society for Private Musical Performances, which gave concerts of then recent or new music by Béla Bartók, Berg, Ferruccio Busoni, Debussy, Erich Wolfgang Korngold, Mahler, Maurice Ravel, Max Reger, Erik Satie, Strauss, Stravinsky, and Webern himself. After their Society performances in 1919 (and while working on his own Opp. 14–15), Webern wrote to Berg that Stravinsky's Berceuses du chat "[move] me completely beyond belief," describing them as "indescribably touching," and that Stravinsky's Pribaoutki were "something really glorious"; like the Berceuses du chat, Webern's subsequent Five Canons, Op. 16, were only several measures long each and scored for vocalist accompanied by clarinets (or in the case of Nos. 2 and 4, a clarinet).

After the dissolution of the Society amid catastrophic hyperinflation in 1921, Webern obtained work as director not only of the Wiener Schubertbund, but also, from 1922 until the dissolution of these institutions after the failed February Uprising, of the mixed-voice amateur Singverein der Sozialdemokratischen Kunstelle[e] and the Arbeiter-Sinfonie-Konzerte[f] through his relationship with DJ Bach, Director of the Sozialdemokratische Kunststelle.[g][20] His performances in this capacity were aired on Österreichischer Rundfunk no fewer than twenty times starting in 1927. In 1933 he engaged Erich Leinsdorf as rehearsal and solo pianist for the Singverein,[21] who later reflected on the experience as of "utmost value to my musical and critical development";[22] together they gave a performance of Stravinsky's dance cantata on folk idioms Les Noces,[23] of which the popevki-like 3-7A cell and its 4–10 variant[24] are not altogether unlike the rhythmized trichords of Webern's Op. 24 from the following year (1934)[25] or the Op. 30 tetrachords[26] (which Stravinsky later admired)[27] apart from Stravinsky's tendency to anhemitony[28] in marked contrast to Webern's hemitonicism.[29] In 1926, Webern noted his voluntary resignation as chorusmaster of the Mödling Männergesang-Verein,[h] a paid position, in controversy over his hiring of a Jewish singer, Greta Wilheim, to replace a sick one. Letters document their correspondence in many subsequent years, and she (among others) would in turn provide him with facilities to teach private lessons as a convenience to Webern, his family, and his students.[30]

Webern's music began to be performed more widely during and after the 1920s, yet he found no great success such as Berg enjoyed with Wozzeck nor even as Schoenberg did, to a lesser extent, with Pierrot lunaire or in time with Verklärte Nacht. His Symphony, Op. 21, was performed in New York through the League of Composers in 1929 and again in Oxford at the ninth festival of the International Society for Contemporary Music, and he was later awarded Music Prize of the City of Vienna. By the early 1930s, he had become President of the Vienna section of the ISCM and was developing a close working friendship with Krenek, alongside whom Webern lectured, whose music (taking a twelve-tone turn) Webern conducted, and with whom Webern shared certain affinities during what was again becoming an increasingly difficult time for both. As Stefan Zweig wrote before his suicide in 1942, "the short decade between 1924 and 1933, from the end of German inflation to Hitler's seizure of power, represents—in spite of all—an intermission in the catastrophic sequence of events whose witnesses and victims our generation has been since 1914."[31]

1933–1938: Austrofascism and AnschlussEdit

Your 'avowal of faith' has given me extraordinary joy, your avowal of the viewpoint that art has its own laws and that, if one wants to achieve something in it, only these laws and nothing else can have validity. However, as we recognize this we also sense that, the greater the confusion becomes, the graver is the responsibility placed on us to safeguard the heritage given us for the future.

Webern, March 6, 1934, responding to Křenek's essay "Freedom and Responsibility" in Willi Reich [de]'s music journal 23. Eine Wiener Musikzeitschrift. Křenek advocated for "a Catholic Austrian avante garde" in opposition to "the Austrian provincialism that National Socialism wants to force on us".[32] Webern was unhappy with anti-clericalism of the Social Democrats as a Catholic[33] and alarmed by accelerating civil disorder and political instability. Both he and Křenek opposed the anti-modernist cultural policy of the Nazis.[32]

He [Webern] said to me, "It's only the superior old German culture that can save this world from the demoralized condition into which it has been thrown." You see, during the '20s and early '30s, Germany and Austria were in social chaos. This country [the US] experienced something similar at the time of the Vietnam War. You [interviewer, 1987] remember how it was here [in the US]. Students were rebelling, occupying campus buildings; armed protesters were clashing with the police. People were wondering: how far will it go? how's it going to turn out? It was that kind of climate in Central Europe, only much worse. Here there was some sort of control, but there was no control in Vienna. The attitudes of young people were so cynical, and their behavior in the cafés and on the streets was really worrisome to the older generations. People like Webern thought the world was lost. Everything was so Bolshevik—so without discipline and cultivation—that only some kind of determined autocracy could solve society's problems and provide the salvation for all of Western humanity. If you asked Webern, 'Why does it have to be somebody like Hitler?', his answer was, 'Who knows if these excesses we've been reading about are real? As far as I'm concerned that's propaganda!' ... This conversation took place in 1936. It seems to me that, in the preceding years, there must have been a time when Webern felt the pull of great contradictions, a time when he was torn constantly ... ."

Louis Krasner, as told to Don C. Seibert and published in Fanfare in 1987. Krasner's pejorative "Bolshevik," in a manner similar to its use against Webern et al. ("cultural Bolshevism"), is language drawn from mostly rightist anti-Bolshevik propaganda.[34]

Webern's music, along with that of Berg, Křenek, Schoenberg, and others, was denounced as cultural Bolshevism and proscribed as Entartete Kunst by the Nazi Party in Germany, and its publication and performance were forbidden, although neither did it fare well under Austrofascism.[35] An Austrian gauleiter on Bayerischer Rundfunk labeled both Berg and Webern as Jewish composers in 1933,[36] and Berg wrote to Adorno of prior instances.[37] Amid the rise of fascism in the 1930s, both found it harder to earn a living; Webern lost a promising conducting career which might have otherwise been more noted and recorded and had to take on work as an editor and proofreader for his publishers, UE.[38] In 1933, Webern attacked Nazi cultural policies in private lectures; publication "would have exposed Webern to serious consequences."[39]

Violinist Louis Krasner described Webern as naive and idealistic but not entirely without his wits, shame, or conscience, contextualizing Webern as a member of Austrian society at the time, one departed by Schoenberg and one in which the already pro-Nazi Vienna Philharmonic had even refused to play the late Berg's Violin Concerto.[40] Krasner was particularly troubled by a 1936 conversation with Webern about the Jews, in which Webern expressed his vague but unambiguously anti-Semitic opinion that "Even Schoenberg, had he not been a Jew, would have been quite different!" Krasner remembered that "Jews ... were at the center of the difficulty. Those who wanted to, put the blame for all this calamity, for all this depraved condition, on the Jews who had brought it with them—along with a lot of radical ideas—from the East. People blamed the Jews for their financial worries. The Jews were, at the same time, the poverty-stricken people who came with nothing, and the capitalists who controlled everything."[41]

When the Nazis invaded Austria, Krasner was visiting Webern in Maria Enzersdorf; Webern, uncannily seeming to anticipate the timing down to 4 o'clock in the afternoon, turned on the radio to hear this news and immediately warned Krasner, urging him to flee, whereupon he did (first to Vienna). Whether this was for Krasner's safety or to save Webern the embarrassment of Krasner's presence during a time of possible celebration in the pro-Nazi Webern family (or indeed in most of pro-Nazi Mödling, by Krasner's description as well as one even more vivid of Arnold Greissle-Schönberg),[42] Krasner was ambivalent and uncertain, withholding judgment. Krasner revisited frequently, hoping to convince friends (e.g., Schoenberg's daughter Gertrude and her husband Felix Greissle) to emigrate before time ran out. Krasner eventually left more permanently, after a 1941 incident wherein he felt only his US passport saved him from both locals and police.[43] Only later did Krasner himself realize how self-admittedly "foolhardy" he had been and in what danger he had placed himself, revealing an ignorance perhaps shared by Webern, who wrote to Humplik and Jone on the day of the Anschluss to be left alone: "I am totally immersed in my work [composing] and cannot, cannot be disturbed."[44] Krasner's presence could have been a disturbance to Webern for this reason, and Bailey Puffett speculates that this may indeed be why he was rushed off by Webern.[45]

Webern's attitude towards Nazism has been variously described. This may reflect Webern's own vacillations, ambivalence, or cognitive dissonance no less than the different contexts in which, or the audiences to whom, his views were expressed: a very wide variety of differences were represented in his friends, family, and colleagues, from active members of the Nazi Party within his family[46] to the Zionist Schoenberg, who emigrated; the left-leaning Berg,[i] who died in 1935; and others of their Social Democratic milieu in previously "red" Vienna,[55] most of whom fled. [56] Nazism itself, "not a coherent doctrine or body of systemically interrelated ideas, but rather a vaguer worldview made up of a number of prejudices with varied appeals to different audiences which could scarcely be dignified with the term 'ideology,'"[57] has been variously described.

There is, moreover, political complexity to complicate individual culpability.[38] After World War I, the center-left Social Democrats had governed with the right-wing Social Christians in increasingly tenuous coalition, with the emergence of paramilitaries and disorder culminating in civil war. As a matter of Realpolitik and self-determination, prominent Austromarxists Otto Bauer and Karl Renner, among other Social Democrats, endured in their support of a German-Austrian Anschluss, unanimously passed by the Provisional National Assembly in 1918 as an answer to the Grossdeutsche Lösung before the peace treaty-imposed post-Habsburg rump state ("ce qui reste, c'est l'Autriche").[j] With their party outlawed and some members interned under Austrofascism, some Social Democrats, at least initially, viewed National Socialists as no worse than what had become of Social Christians, merged by Engelbert Dollfuss into the clericofascist Vaterländische Front in concert with appeals to Austrians' Catholic identity and imperial history in order to maintain independence of Nazi Germany[k] through alliance with Fascist Italy and Hungary;[60] thus Bauer, Renner, and others supported the Anschluss referendum even under Nazi occupation[61] following years of deteriorating German-Austrian relations and Austrian weakening, including the failed Austrian Nazi coup d'état and continuing economic warfare and destruction of infrastructure. Likewise, as an expression more of pan-nationalism and populism than frank Nazism, many Austrians hoped for post-Anschluss political stability and prosperity. Bailey Puffett wrote that Webern may well have hoped to be able again to conduct and to be better able to secure a future for his family under a new regime that proclaimed itself "socialist" no less than nationalist.[38]

1938–1945: German Reich, Kristallnacht, and World War IIEdit

In broad terms, Webern's attitude seems to have first warmed to a degree of characteristic fervor and later, in conjunction with widespread German disillusionment, cooled to Hitler and the Nazis to such an extent that by 1945 he had resolved to emigrate to England.[62] Webern's patriotism led him to endorse the Nazi regime in a series of letters to Joseph Hueber, who was serving in the army and himself held such views.[63] On 2 May 1940, Webern described Hitler as "this unique man" who created "the new state" of Germany;[64] thus Alex Ross characterizes him as "an unashamed Hitler enthusiast".[65]

Following Kristallnacht, Webern checked on and aided Jewish colleagues DJ Bach, Otto Jokl, Josef Polnauer, and Hugo Winter.[66] Polnauer, a fellow early Schoenberg pupil, historian, and librarian for whom Schoenberg was unable to secure passage to the US,[67] managed to survive the Holocaust as an albino and later edited a 1959 publication by UE of Webern's correspondence from this time with Hildegard Jone [de], Webern's then lyricist and collaborator, and her husband, sculptor Josef Humplik.[68]

Webern's financial situation deteriorated until, by August 1940, his personal records reflected no monthly income.[69] He attended the 1943 Winterthur première of his Op. 30 only with the diplomatic intervention and financial support of Werner Reinhart, its dedicatee.

Webern's 1944–1945 correspondence is strewn with references to bombings, deaths, destruction, privation, and the disintegration of local order; but also noted are the births of several grandchildren.[70] At the age of sixty (i.e., in Dec. 1943), Webern wrote that he was living in a barrack away from home and working from 6 am to 5 pm, compelled by the state in a time of war to serve as an air-raid protection police officer.[70] On 3 March 1945, news was relayed to Webern that his only son, Peter, died on 14 February of wounds suffered in a strafing attack on a military train two days earlier.[71]

Toward the end of the war, the Weberns provided Schoenberg's first son Görgi and his family, for whom Schoenberg was unable to secure their passage to the US despite many attempts,[67] food and shelter in a Mödling apartment belonging to their son-in-law.[72] With the Red Army approaching, the Weberns fled on foot to Mittersill, about 75 km. away; there, Amalie, one of Webern's daughters, wrote of "17 persons pressed together in the smallest possible space."[70] Görgi and his family stayed behind for their safety, but due to the Nazi munitions and propaganda in the apartment's storeroom, Görgi was held and nearly executed as a Nazi spy when he was discovered. He was able to convince a Jewish, German-speaking officer that he was not, drawing attention to his clothes, sewn with the yellow Star of David.[43] Görgi and his family continued to live in this apartment with this family until 1969.[72]

 
Grave of Webern and his wife "Minna" at the cemetery in Mittersill

1945: Allied-administered AustriaEdit

On 15 September 1945, following the arrest of his son-in-law for black-market activities, Webern was smoking a cigar outside his home so as not to disturb his sleeping grandchildren about one hour before curfew when he was shot and killed by US Army cook PFC Raymond Norwood Bell of North Carolina, who, overcome by remorse, died of alcoholism in 1955.[73]

Webern's wife Wilhelmine "Minna" Mörtl was buried with him when she died in 1949. Her last years were marred by grief, illness, loneliness (as friends and family continued to emigrate), and continuing poverty and consequent embarrassment. She worked to get his 1907 Piano Quintet finally published by Bomart via Kurt List and Opp. 17, 24–25, and 29–31 published by UE at the behest of Alfred Schlee [de], who solicited her urgently, with the abolition of the Entartete Kunst ban, for Webern's manuscripts hidden in Vienna. News of performances abroad made her wish that Webern had lived to experience more successes, and her grief was compounded by the lack of commemoration in Vienna: she asked Jone in 1948, "Should Anton have already been forgotten? Or is it the fault of the dreadful time in which we live?" In 1947 she wrote to Dietz, who had emigrated to the US, that "during the summer of 1945 [Webern] became convinced that he could not live here [in Austria] any more. He was firmly resolved to go to England and he would have carried it out, too"; likewise, in 1946, she wrote to DJ Bach, who had emigrated to London: "How difficult the last eight years had been for him. [He] was so embittered that he had only the one wish: to flee from this country. But one was caught, without a will of one's own. ... It was close to the limit of endurance what we had to suffer."[74]

MusicEdit

Tell me, can one at all denote thinking and feeling as things entirely separable? I cannot imagine a sublime intellect without the ardor of emotion.

Webern, June 23, 1910, writing to Schoenberg[75] (and to be much later echoed by Theodor W. Adorno,[76] who described Webern as "the only one to propound musical expressionism in its strictest sense, carrying it to such a point that it reverts of its own weight to a new objectivity[77])

Webern's works are concise, distilled, and select; when Boulez, for a second time, recorded all of his then published compositions, including some of those without opus numbers, the results fit on just six CDs.[78] Not all of his works were or could be published in his lifetime, especially after 1934. His music is often considered inaccessible by listeners and difficult by performers alike;[79] Babbitt observed that during Webern's life it "was regarded (to the very limited extent that it was regarded at all) as the ultimate in hermetic, specialized, and idiosyncratic composition."[80] Though his œuvre comprises stylistic shifts, it is typified by spartan textures, in which every note can be heard; carefully chosen timbres, often resulting in very detailed instructions to the performers and use of extended instrumental techniques (flutter tonguing, col legno, and so on); wide-ranging melodic lines, often with leaps greater than an octave or more;[81] and brevity: the Six Bagatelles for string quartet, Op. 9, (1913), for instance, last about three minutes in total.[82] The concerns and techniques of his music were cohesive, interrelated, and only very gradually transformed with the overlap of old and new, particularly in the case of his middle-period lieder (for example, his first use of twelve-tone technique in Op. 17, Nos. 2 and 3, was not especially stylistically significant and only eventually became realized as otherwise so in later works).[83]

A very general feature of Webern's music, as much of Schoenberg's, is a predilection toward the use of minor seconds, major sevenths, and minor ninths, as noted with some insight in 1934 by microtonalist Alois Hába, writing of his and his students' affinities with Schoenberg in particular,[84] and later by both Valentina Kholopova and Yuri Kholopov in formulations more specific to Webern[85] and with a more unifying emphasis on the semitone in the context of axial inversional symmetry and octave equivalence (i.e., interval class 1, or ic1), approaching Allen Forte's more generalizing pitch-class set analysis.[86] Webern's consistent and distinctive use of ic1 in particular within small subsets of other intervals, sometimes derived from a given twelve-tone row in his later practice, was well noted.[l] Webern often musically expresses ic1 as a major seventh, minor ninth, or even wider interval.[88] Webern's intervallic practices may be more globally understood as the outcome of a inversionally symmetrical treatment of pitch in a manner comparable to other modernists, including Berg, Bartók, Debussy, Schoenberg, and Stravinsky, or more nascently even Liszt and Wagner, but often far more strictly and increasingly in schemes with other parameters (e.g., fixed or "frozen" register, the association of articulations and dynamics with specific pitches).[89]

1899–1908: Formative juvenilia and emergence from studyEdit

Webern published little of his early work in particular; like Brahms, Webern was meticulous and revised extensively.[90] Many juvenilia remained unknown until the work and findings of the Moldenhauers in the 1960s, effectively obscuring and undermining formative facets of Webern's musical identity.[91] Thus when Boulez first oversaw a project to record "all" of Webern's music, not including the juvenilia, the results fit on three rather than six CDs.[92]

Except for the violin pieces and a few of my orchestra pieces, all of my works from the Passacaglia on relate to the death of my mother.

Webern, letter to Alban Berg[93]

Webern's earliest works consist primarily of lieder, the genre that most testifies to his roots in Romanticism, specifically German Romanticism; one in which the music yields brief but explicit, potent, and spoken meaning manifested only latently or programmatically in purely instrumental genres; one marked by significant intimacy and lyricism; and one which often associates nature, especially landscapes, with themes of homesickness, solace, wistful yearning, distance, utopia, and belonging. Robert Schumann's "Mondnacht" is an iconic example; Joseph Freiherr von Eichendorff, whose lyric poetry inspired it, is not far removed from the poets (e.g., Richard Dehmel, Gustav Falke, Theodor Storm) whose work inspired Webern and his contemporaries Berg, Reger, Schoenberg, Strauss, Wolf, and Alexander Zemlinsky.[94] Wolf's Mörike-Lieder were especially influential on Webern's efforts from this period. But well beyond these lieder alone, all of Webern's music may be said to possess such concerns and qualities, as is evident from his sketches, albeit in an increasingly symbolic, abstract, spare, introverted, and idealized manner.[95]

Webern's first piece after completing his studies with Schoenberg was the Passacaglia for orchestra (1908), Op. 1. Harmonically, it is a step forward into a more advanced language, and the orchestration is somewhat more distinctive than his earlier orchestral work. However, it bears little relation to the fully mature works he is best known for today. One element that is typical is the form itself: the passacaglia is a form which dates back to the 17th century, and a distinguishing feature of Webern's later work was to be the use of traditional compositional techniques (especially canons) and forms (the Symphony, the Concerto, the String Trio, and String Quartet, and the piano and orchestral Variations) in a modern harmonic and melodic language.[96]

1908–1924: Atonality, aphorism, and liederEdit

Webern wrote freely atonal music somewhat in the style of Schoenberg starting with Op. 3. The two were so close in their artistic development that in 1951 Schoenberg reflected that he had sometimes no longer known who he was. But Webern did not merely follow Schoenberg.[98] Ethan Haimo noted the swift, radical influence in summer 1909 of Webern's novel and arresting Fünf Sätze for string quartet, Op. 5, on Schoenberg's subsequent Klavierstück Op. 11, No. 3 (which differs markedly from Op. 11, Nos. 1 and 2 of February 1909);[m] Fünf Orchesterstücke for orchestra, Op. 16; and monodrama Erwartung, Op. 17.[100] In 1949 Schoenberg still remembered being "intoxicated by the enthusiasm of having freed music from the shackles of tonality" and believing with his pupils "that now music could renounce motivic features and remain coherent and comprehensible nonetheless".[101]

With Opp. 18–20, Schoenberg began to retreat somewhat. In Pierrot lunaire (1912), Op. 21, there are elements of Kabarett, neoclassicism, and neo-Romanticism (e.g., canon and passacaglia in "Nacht," canon and fugue in "Der Mondfleck," waltz in "Serenade," triadic harmony in "O alter Duft"), as befits the text's protagonist. With its contrapuntal procedures and nonstandard ensemble, Pierrot was received by Webern as a direction for the composition of his own Opp. 14–16.[106]

Of some fifty-six songs on which Webern worked during and after World War I (1914–1926), he ultimately finished and later published only thirty-two, carefully ordered into sets as Opp. 12–19.[107] "How much I owe to your Pierrot", he wrote Schoenberg upon completing a setting of Georg Trakl's "Abendland III", Op. 14, No. 4,[108] in which, distinctly, there is no silence or rest until a pause at the concluding gesture. A recurring theme is that of the wanderer, estranged or lost and seeking return to or at least retrieval from an earlier time and place. This wartime theme of wandering in search of home or rest fits with two complex, interrelated concerns more broadly evident in Webern's work: first, the loss and memory of his mother, father, and nephew, usually from a religious perspective; and second, Webern's broad and spiritual, even pantheistic sense of Heimat in the form of abstracted and idealized rural landscapes, such as that of the lost Preglhof esate or the Alps.[109] In a stage play he wrote in October 1913, Tot, Webern drew on Emanuel Swedenborg's notion of correspondence to explore these concerns over the course of six alpine scenes of reflection and self-consolation.

Johnson argues that the whole of Webern's music takes on the nature of such dramatic and visual tableaux, if in a more abstract and formal manner in some of the late works. Melodies frequently begin and end on weak beats, settle into or arise out of ostinati, or otherwise dynamically and texturally emerge or fade away.[110] Tonality, useful for communicating direction and narrative in programmatic pieces, becomes more tenuous, fragmented, static, symbolic, and visual or spatial in function, thus mirroring the concerns and topics, explicit or implicit, of Webern's music and his textual selections for lieder, especially from the poetry of Stefan George and Trakl. Expanding on the orchestration of Mahler, Webern sought a colorful and novel but idiosyncratically fragile and intimate sound, not infrequently bordering on silence at a typical ppp, whether evocative of the female or an angelic voice (e.g., the use of solo violin),[111] to inward or outward luminosity or darkness (e.g., the use of the entire range of register within the ensemble;[112] registral compression and expansion;[113] the use of celesta, harp, and glockenspiel;[114] the use of harmonics and sul ponticello),[115] or to angels and heaven (e.g., the use of harp and trumpet in the circling ostinati of Op. 6, No. 5,[109] and winding to conclusion at the very end of Op. 15, No. 5).[116]

For Webern especially, text-setting became a means of composing more than atonal aphorisms, but Schoenberg sought other means, "long ... yearning for a style for large forms ... to give personal things an objective, general form."[n] From as early as 1906 Berg, Schoenberg, and Webern indulged a shared interest in esotericism, Swedenborgian mysticism, and Theosophy, reading Honoré de Balzac (Louis Lambert and Séraphîta) and August Strindberg (Till Damaskus and Jacob lutte) as they explored ways forward in their own work. Gabriel, the protagonist of Schoenberg's semi-autobiographical Die Jakobsleiter (1914–1922, rev. 1944)[o] begins by describing a journey: "whether right, whether left, forwards or backwards, uphill or down – one must keep on going without asking what lies ahead or behind."[p] Webern interpreted this line as a metaphor for pitch space, as Schoenberg did later,[q] ultimately considering Jakobsleiter a "real twelve-tone composition" for its opening hexachordal ostinato and referring to a "Scherzo [theme] ... which accidentally consisted of all the twelve tones," aware that "[a]n historian will probably one day find ... how enthusiastic [Webern and I] were about this." On the journey to composition with twelve tones, Webern revised many of his middle-period lieder in the years after their apparent composition but before publication, increasingly prioritizing clarity of pitch relations, even against timbral effects, as Anne Shreffler and Felix Meyer have described.

1924–1945: Formal coherence and expansionEdit

 
The symmetry of Webern's tone row from Variations, Op. 30, is apparent from the equivalent, P1=IR1 and R12=I12, and thus reduced number of row forms, two, P and R, plus transpositions. Consisting of three related tetrachords: a and c consisting of two minor seconds and one minor third and b consisting of two minor thirds and one minor second. Notes 4–7 and 6–9 also consist of two minor seconds and one minor third. "The entire series thus consists of two intervals and has the greatest possible unity of series form, interval, motif, and chords.[26]

Paradoxically, this product of hermetic constructivism seems infused with intense emotion, that emotion evenly diffused across the whole surface of the music. Gone is the mono-directional thrust of Classical and Romantic music; in its place a world of rotations and reflections, opening myriad paths for the listener to trace through textures of luminous clarity yet beguiling ambiguity.

George Benjamin, describing Webern's Symphony, Op. 21.[121]

With the Drei Volkstexte (1925), Op. 17, Webern used Schoenberg's twelve-tone technique for the first time, and all his subsequent works used this technique. The String Trio (1926–1927), Op. 20, was both the first purely instrumental work using the twelve-tone technique (the other pieces were songs) and the first cast in a traditional musical form.[122]

Like that of both Brahms and Schoenberg, Webern's music is marked by its emphasis on counterpoint and formal considerations, and his commitment to systematic pitch organization in the twelve-tone method is inseparable from this prior commitment.[123] His tone rows are often arranged to take advantage of internal symmetries: a row may be divided into four groups of three pitches which are variations, such as inversions and retrogrades, of each other, thus creating invariance. This gives Webern's work considerable motivic unity, although this is often obscured by the fragmentation of the melodic lines. This fragmentation occurs through octave displacement (using intervals greater than an octave) and by moving the line rapidly from instrument to instrument in a technique referred to as Klangfarbenmelodie.[124]

Webern's late cantatas seem to indicate new developments in style, which Webern himself noted ecstatically in letters to the Humpliks,[125] or at least a thoroughgoing synthesis of the formal rigors of his mature instrumental works with the word painting of his lieder on a larger, orchestral scale.[126] They are texturally somewhat denser and more homophonic at the surface through nonetheless contrapuntal polyphonic means,[125] with "Schweigt auch die Welt" culminating in a twelve-tone simultaneity.

An apparent third cantata (1944–1945), setting "Das Sonnenlicht spricht" from Jone's Lumen cycle, was left in his sketchbook, having been planned initially as a concerto.[127]

Arrangements and orchestrationsEdit

In his youth (1903), Webern orchestrated at least five of Franz Schubert's various lieder, giving the piano accompaniment to an appropriately Schubertian orchestra of strings and pairs of flutes, oboes, clarinets, bassoons, and horns: "Der Vollmond Strahlt auf Bergeshöhn" (the Romanze from Rosamunde), "Tränenregen" (from Die schöne Müllerin), "Der Wegweiser" (from Winterreise), "Du bist die Ruh", and "Ihr Bild";[128] in 1934, he did the same for Schubert's six Deutsche Tänze (German Dances) of 1824.

For Schoenberg's Society for Private Musical Performances in 1921, Webern arranged, among other things,[129] the 1888 Schatz-Walzer (Treasure Waltz) of Johann Strauss II's Der Zigeunerbaron (The Gypsy Baron) for string quartet, harmonium, and piano.

In 1924, Webern arranged Franz Liszt's Arbeiterchor (Workers' Chorus, c. 1847–1848)[130] for bass solo, mixed chorus, and large orchestra; it was premièred for the first time in any form on 13 and 14 March 1925, with Webern conducting the first full-length concert of the Austrian Association of Workers Choir. A review in the Amtliche Wiener Zeitung (28 March 1925) read "neu in jedem Sinne, frisch, unverbraucht, durch ihn zieht die Jugend, die Freude" ("new in every respect, fresh, vital, pervaded by youth and joy").[131] The text, in English translation, reads in part: "Let us have the adorned spades and scoops,/ Come along all, who wield a sword or pen,/ Come here ye, industrious, brave and strong/ All who create things great or small." Liszt, initially inspired by his revolutionary countrymen, had left it in manuscript at publisher Carl Haslinger [de]'s discretion.[132]

Performance styleEdit

Eric Simon, who then played clarinet in the orchestra, related this episode: 'Webern was obviously upset by Klemperer's sober time-beating. He thought that if you did not go through physical and mental stresses and strains a performance was bound to be poor. During intermission he turned to the concert master and said: "You know, Herr Gutmann, the phrase there in measure so-and-so must be played Tiiiiiiiiiii-aaaaaaaaa." Klemperer, overhearing the conversation, turned around and said sarcastically: "Herr Gutmann, now you probably know exactly how you have to play the passage!"' Peter Stadlen, who sat with Webern at the concert, later provided a first-hand account of the composer's reaction after the performance: '... Webern turned to me and said with some bitterness: "A high note, a low note, a note in the middle—like the music of a madman!"'

The Moldenhauers detail Webern's reaction to Otto Klemperer's confused and unsympathetic 1936 ISCM performance of his Symphony (1928), Op. 21, which Webern had earlier played at the piano for Klemperer "with enormous intensity and fanaticism ... passionately".[133]

Webern insisted on lyricism, nuance, rubato, sensitivity, and both emotional and intellectual understanding in performance of music;[134] this is evidenced by anecdotes, correspondence, extant recordings of Schubert's Deutsche Tänze (arr. Webern) and Berg's Violin Concerto under his direction, many such detailed markings in his scores (including a specially marked score of the Piano Variations),[135] and finally by his compositional process as both publicly stated and later revealed in the musical and extramusical metaphors and associations everywhere throughout his sketches. As both a composer and conductor, he was one of many (e.g., Wilhelm Furtwängler, Dimitri Mitropoulos, Hermann Scherchen) in a contemporaneous tradition of conscientiously and non-literally handling notated musical figures, phrases, and even entire scores so as to maximize expressivity in performance and to cultivate audience engagement and understanding.[136] Felix Galimir, of the Galimir Quartet, told The New York Times in 1981: "Berg asked for enormous correctness in the performance of his music. But the moment this was achieved, he asked for a very Romanticized treatment. Webern, you know, was also terribly Romantic—as a person, and when he conducted. Everything was almost over-sentimentalized. It was entirely different from what we have been led to believe today. His music should be played very freely, very emotionally."[137]

This aspect of Webern's work had been typically missed in his immediate post-war reception, however, even as it may radically affect the music's reception. For example, Boulez's "complete" recording of Webern's music yielded more to this aesthetic the second time after largely missing it the first; but Eliahu Inbal's rendition of Webern's Symphony, Op. 21 with the hr-Sinfonieorchester is still far more within the spirit of the late Romantic performance tradition (which Webern seemingly intended for his music),[r] nearly slowing to half-tempo for the whole of first movement and taking care to delineate and shape each melodic strand and expressive gesture throughout the entirety of the work.[139]

Reception, influence, and legacyEdit

The 15th of September 1945, the day of Anton Webern's death, should be a day of mourning for any receptive musician. We must hail not only this great composer but also a real hero. Doomed to a total failure in a deaf world of ignorance and indifference he inexorably kept on cutting out his diamonds, his dazzling diamonds, the mines of which he had such a perfect knowledge.

Igor Stravinsky lauded Webern in a special edition of Die Reihe[140]

In 1947, Schoenberg remembered and expressed solidarity with Berg and Webern despite rumors of the latter's having "fallen into the Nazi trap":[s] "Let us—for the moment at least—forget all that might have at one time divided us. For there remains for our future what could only have begun to be realized posthumously: One will have to consider us three—Berg, Schoenberg, and Webern—as a unity, a oneness, because we believed in ideals, once perceived, with intensity and selfless devotion; nor would we ever have been deterred from them, even if those who tried might have succeeded in confounding us."[t] Krasner notes that this "puts 'Vienna's Three Modern Classicists' into historical perspective," summarizing it as "what bound us together was our idealism."[141]

In part because he had largely remained obscure and arcane during his own lifetime,[145] interest in Webern's music increased in the aftermath of World War II[146] as it came to represent a universally or generally valid, systematic, and compellingly logical model of new composition,[147] with his œuvre acquiring "a saintly, visionary aura".[145] This was made possible in large part by René Leibowitz as he championed, performed, promulgated, and published Schoenberg et son école,[148] but Theodor W. Adorno and others also contributed.[149] When Webern's Piano Variations were performed at Darmstadt in 1948, young composers listened in a quasi-religious trance.[145] In 1955, the second issue of Eimert and Stockhausen's journal Die Reihe was devoted to Webern's œuvre, and in 1960 his lectures were published by UE.[146]

It has been suggested that post-war composers' fascination with Webern's music was enabled by its apparent simplicity and concision facilitating musical analysis.[150] Gottfried Michael Koenig speculates on the basis of his personal experience that since Webern's scores represented such a highly concentrated source, they may have been considered the better for didactic purposes than those of other composers. Robert Beyer [de] criticized the approach of early serialists to Webern's music as reductive and narrowly focused on some of Webern's apparent methods rather than on his music more generally, especially neglecting timbre in their typical selection of Opp. 27–28. Karel Goeyvaerts recalled that at least on first impression, the sound of Webern's music reminded him of "a Mondrian canvas," explaining that "things of which I had acquired an extremely intimate knowledge, came across as crude and unfinished when seen in reality."[151] Expressing a related opinion, contemporaneous German music critic and contributor to Die Reihe Wolf-Eberhard von Lewinski wrote in the Darmstädter Tagblatt (3 September 1959) that some of the later and more radical music at Darmstadt was "acoustically absurd [if] visually amusing"; several days later, one of his articles in the Der Kurier was similarly headlined "Meager modern music—only interesting to look at."[152]

Meanwhile, Webern's characteristically passionate pan-German nationalism and politics were not widely known or mooted,[145] likely due to his personal associations in fin-de-siècle and Red Vienna, his marginalization under fascism and Gleichschaltung, his loyalty and assistance to his Jewish friends and colleagues (especially after Kristallnacht),[153] and his mysterious fate in the immediate aftermath of World War II.[u] Significantly as relates to his reception, Stravinsky noted that Webern never compromised his artistic identity and values.

Somewhat independently and singularly, Luigi Dallapiccola found inspiration in Webern's lesser-known middle-period lieder, with the 1953 Goethe-Lieder especially recalling Webern's Op. 16 in style.[154] A later work, Dialoghi (1959–1960), testifies to his intimate familiarity with not only with Webern's procedures and works in particular, but also those of Schoenberg as well.[155]

Well into and beyond the 1960s, Webern's work continued to influence musicians even as far removed as Joel Thome and Frank Zappa,[156] yet many post-war European musicians and scholars had already begun to look beyond[157] as much as back at Webern: there was some rapprochement with Berg and advocacy for more engagement with the expressionism of Webern's atonal works in contrast to some earlier post-Webernism. In Adorno's 1954 lecture "The Aging of the New Music," he claimed that in the prevailing climate "artists like Berg or Webern would hardly be able to make it"; against the "static idea of music" and "total rationalization" of the "pointillist constructivists," he advocated for more subjectivity, citing Über das Geistige in der Kunst (1911), in which Wassily Kandinsky wrote: "Schoenberg's [expressionist] music leads us to where musical experience is a matter not of the ear, but of the soul—and from this point begins the music of the future." Even as the first scene of Pousseur's Votre Faust (1960–1968) quotes the opening of "Schweigt auch die Welt," dramatizing the composer Henri's analysis of Webern's Op. 31, it already has several elements of late or postmodernism, with its extreme plurality of historically developed styles, mobile form, and polyvalent roles in the service of a self-reflexive theme of relative, unstable identity[158] (traces perhaps of Berg, whose example Pousseur cites,[159] from whose music he quotes in the second scene, and whose writings he translated into French in the 1950s).[160][v] Boulez was "thrilled" by Berg's "universe ... never completed, always in expansion—a world so ... inexhaustible," referring to the rigorously organized, only partly twelve-tone Chamber Concerto and echoing Adorno's praise for Lulu,[w] the première of which Boulez conducted in 1979 after its finished orchestration by Friedrich Cerha. Both Ferneyhough and Lachenmann sympathetically expanded upon and poetically went further than Webern in attention to the smallest of details and the use of ever more radically extended techniques: for example, Ferneyhough's 1967 Sonatas for string quartet comprise not only serial, but also atonal sections much in the style of Webern's Op. 9 yet more intensely sustained; and Lachenmann wrote in the 1985 essay, "Hearing [Hören] is Defenseless—without Listening [Hören]," of "a melody made of a single note [...] in the viola part" in mm. 2–4 of Webern's Op. 10, No. 4, amid "the mere ruins of the traditional linguistic context," in a comparison to his own 1969 Air, in which even "the pure tone, now living in tonal exile, has in this new context no aesthetic advantage over pure noise."

In the Communist Bloc, the music of the Second Viennese School proved an often bewildering or professionally dangerous but sometimes exciting or inspiring alternative to socialist realist art music, given access. Whereas Berg's Lyric Suite, performed by the Kolisch Quartet at the 1927 Baden-Baden ISCM festival where Bartók performed his own Piano Sonata, could inspire Bartók in his subsequent third and fourth string quartets[161] and later Concerto for Orchestra,[162] Second Viennese influence on composers behind the Iron Curtain was mediated by anti-fascist and anti-German sentiment[163] and obstructed by anti-formalist cultural policies[164] and Cold War separation more generally. In 1970 Ligeti explained, "In countries where there exists a certain isolation, in Eastern Europe, one cannot obtain correct information. One is cut off from the circulation of blood."[165] Following the 1956 uprising in Hungary, the influence of Webern initially predominated, bearing on Pál Kadosa, Endre Szervánszky, and György Kurtág.[166] Among Czechs, Marek Kopelent, who discovered the Second Viennese School as an editor and was particularly taken by Webern,[167] was ostracized and blacklisted for his avant-garde music at home and despaired, unable to attend performances of his own works abroad;[168] while Pavel Blatný, who attended the Darmstädter Ferienkurse and wrote music with serial techniques in the late 1960s, returned to tonality in Brno and was rewarded.[169] Later still and farther east, Sofia Gubaidulina, for whom music was an escape from the sociopolitical atmosphere of post-Stalinist Soviet Russia, cited the influence of both JS Bach and Webern in particular; she emigrated to Germany in 1992.[170]

Webern's music remains polarizing and provocative[105] within various communities of musicians and scholars. Its legacy (or canonic status) has been celebrated, confirmed, and challenged[149] with recourse or reference to culture, history, ideology, philosophy, politics, social context, and public opinion or audience reception as a critical basis, ranging from the earlier interdisciplinary aesthetics and sociomusicology of Adorno and Ernst Bloch to the New Musicology of Susan McClary and more adjacently Richard Taruskin in the US. Complementing formal musical analysis, which itself was enriched by David Lewin's work toward a more integrative and phenomenological approach, Julian Johnson worked toward a hermeneutics of Webern's music, building on the middle-period lieder sketch studies of Felix Meyer and Anne Shreffler as well as the work of the Moldenhauers. Since the "Restoration of the 1980s," as Martin Kaltenecker termed a paradigm shift from structure more toward perception within the discourse of New Music, challenges have been raised within historical musicology, prompting controversy and admonishments: Charles Rosen scorned a "kind of historical criticism ... avoiding any serious engagement with a work or style that one happens not to like";[171] Andreas Holzer warned of "the spread of post-factual tendencies in musicology";[x] and Pamela M. Potter cautioned that "[i]t is important to consider all the scholarship on musical life in the Third Reich that, taken together, reveals the complexity of the day-to-day existence of musicians and composers", as "[i]t seems inevitable that debates about the political culpability of individuals will persist, especially if the stakes remain so high for composers, for whom an up or down vote can determine inclusion in the canon."[172] Though noted for his polemicism,[173][y] Taruskin's work on New Music since and including the Second Viennese School[175][z] in particular was criticized not only by Holzer[aa] and Rosen,[ab] but also by Max Erwin,[ac] Larson Powell,[ad] Christian Utz [de], Martin Zenck [de],[ae] and particularly Franklin Cox, who faulted him as an unreliable historian and "ideologist of tonal restoration," arguing that his "reactionary historicist" project opposed the Second Viennese School's "progressivist historicist" emancipation of the dissonance.[182] Taruskin himself admitted to having acquired a "dubious reputation" on the Second Viennese School and noted that he was described as "coming, like Shakespeare's Marc Anthony, 'to bury Webern, not to praise him'".[183] In relation to post-Webernism more generally, Holzer warned of attempts "to place Darmstadt in a fascistoid corner or even identifying it as a US propaganda institution amid the Cold War"[af] through "unbelievable distortions, exaggerations, reductions and propagation of clichés".[ag]

Recordings by WebernEdit

NotesEdit

  1. ^ He never used his middle names but signed his name as Anton von Webern until the 1919 Adelsaufhebungsgesetz [de], one of many social-democratic reforms after post-World War I social unrest and political upheaval, which repealed the right to use the aristocratic sign "von" in the then newly proclaimed Republic of German-Austria.
  2. ^ The broader circle of the Second Viennese School included, among others, Oskar Adler, Theodor W. Adorno, Hans Erich Apostel, Robert Gerhard, Norbert von Hannenheim, Heinrich Jalowetz, Hanns Jelinek, Sándor Jemnitz, Otto Jokl [de], Rudolf Kolisch of the Kolisch Quartet, Ernst Krenek, Rita Kurzmann-Leuchter [de], Erwin Leuchter [de], Olga Novakovic, Paul Pisk, Rudolf Ploderer, Josef Polnauer, Willi Reich [de], Josef Rufer, Peter Schacht, Julius Schloss, Nikos Skalkottas, Erwin Stein, Eduard Steuermann, Viktor Ullmann, Rudolf Weirich, Adolph Weiss, Egon Wellesz, Alexander Zemlinsky, and Winfried Zillig. Contemporaneous performers, friends, admirers, and supporters of the circle at various times included figures as diverse as Guido Adler, David Josef Bach,[1] Ernst Bachrich, Imre [Emerich] Balabán and Béla Bartók of the New Hungarian Music Society, Julius Bittner, Artur Bodanzky, Richard Buhlig, Edward Clark, Henry Cowell, Herbert Eimert, Gottfried Feist [ca], Marya Freund, Felix Galimir of the Galimir Quartet, George Gershwin, Richard Gerstl, Walter Gropius, Marie Gutheil-Schoder, Alois Hába, Emil Hertzka, Felicie Hüni-Mihacsek, Erich Itor Kahn, Wassily Kandinsky, Hans Keller, Erich Kleiber, Gustav Klimt, Wilhelm Klitsch, Erich Wolfgang Korngold, Louis Krasner, Józef Koffler, Oskar Kokoschka, René Leibowitz, Erich Leinsdorf, Adolf Loos, Darius Milhaud and Francis Poulenc of Les Six, Elisabeth Lutyens, Gustav and Alma Mahler, Frank Martin, Dimitri Mitropoulos, Soma Morgenstern, Dika Newlin, Will Ogdon, Max Oppenheimer, Otakar Ostrčil, Maurice Ravel, Rudolph Reti, Arnold Rosé et al. of the Rosé Quartet, Hans Rosbaud, Nikolai Roslavets et al. of the Association for Contemporary Music, Hermann Scherchen, Egon Schiele, Alfred Schlee [de], Franz Schreker, Erwin Schulhoff, Rudolf Serkin, Roger Sessions, Peter Stadlen, Erika Stiedry-Wagner [de], Igor Stravinsky, Georg Trakl,[2] Edgard Varèse et al. of the International Composers Guild, Imre Waldbauer et al. of the Waldbauer-Kerpely Quartet [hu], Franz Werfel, Arnold Zweig, and Jung-Wien writers Peter Altenberg, Hermann Bahr, Karl Kraus, and Arthur Schnitzler.
  3. ^ As a teacher, Webern guided and variously influenced Frederick Dorian (Friederich Deutsch), Hanns Eisler, Arnold Elston, Fré Focke [de], Karl Amadeus Hartmann, Philipp Herschkowitz, Kurt List, Matty Niël [nl], Karl Rankl, Humphrey Searle, Leopold Spinner, Stefan Wolpe, Ludwig Zenk [cs], and possibly René Leibowitz.
  4. ^ These youthful impressions are in some contrast to the opinions of Webern in the 1930s, by then a decided nationalist who, as Roland Leich described, "lectured at some length on the utter supremacy of German music, emphasizing that leading composers of other lands are but pale reflections of Germanic masters: Berlioz a French Beethoven, Tchaikovsky a Russian Schumann, Elgar an English Mendelssohn, etc."[18]
  5. ^ Singing Society of the Social Democratic Arts Council
  6. ^ Workers' Symphony Concerts
  7. ^ Social Democratic Arts Council
  8. ^ Men's Singing Society
  9. ^ Adorno recalled that "Berg was little concerned with politics, although he saw himself implicitly a socialist."[47] Following both the 1918 Jännerstreik and the 1919 Spartacist uprising, Berg wrote to Erwin Schulhoff, who would have been sympathetic, "What names does the Entente have (outside of Russia) that ring of idealism as [Rosa] Luxemburg and [Karl] Liebknecht do?"[48] Berg was then adapting Junges Deutschland playwright Georg Büchner's Woyzeck, with its Vormärz theme of alienation,[49] into an opera, Wozzeck. Büchner's revolutionary call for "Peace to the huts! War on the palaces!" (Friede den Hütten! Krieg den Palästen!) in 1834[48] was later paraphrased by August Bebel in 1871 during the Paris Commune[50] and Vladimir Lenin in 1916 and again in his 1917 "Appeal to the Soldiers of All the Belligerent Countries" at the outset of the wave of revolutions that ended World War I, the February Revolution first among them. Premièred in 1925 by Erich Kleiber at the Berlin State Opera, Wozzeck was then taken to Prague by Otakar Ostrčil at the National Theatre in 1926, where it provoked a "scandal," as Berg wrote to Adorno, staged by "Czech Nationalists (virtually Nazis)" and "clerical lobbies [that] was purely political! (To them I am the Berlin Jew Alban (Aaron?) Berg. Ostrčil bribed by the Russian Bolsheviks, the whole thing arranged by the 'Elders of Zion' etc)."[51] In Rudé právo, Zdeněk Nejedlý praised Berg's music and ridiculed the idea that Wozzeck was staged as a Bolshevik conspiracy, as Antonín Šilhan insinuated in Národní listy. Emanuel Žák, writing for Čech, ascribed its "degenerate" nature to Jewish influence.[52] Subsequently the Bohemian State Committee forbade further performances.[51] In its third première in 1927, Nikolai Roslavets' Association for Contemporary Music staged Wozzeck at the Mariinsky Theatre in Leningrad with Berg (and Dmitri Shostakovich) in attendance.[53] Berg wired home to his wife Helene [de] that it "was a huge, tumultuous success," though critical reception was mixed.[54] With Stalinism, it would be 82 years before any Russian opera company performed Wozzeck again.
  10. ^ Thus, when Berg wrote Edward Dent in 1933 asking about an academic position for Adorno to live in England, Dent not only declined on the basis of protectionism and underfunding,[58] but also blamed both "the Jews" as conflated with Social Democrats and pan-Germanists as conflated with Nazi imperialists, confusing Berg: "Germany has had a surplus of musical production for years, and Austria even more so; this is why you (as also [Zoltán] Kodály and Bartók etc.) take it for granted that you can earn your money primarily in Germany. You [note in Berg's hand: '(The Jews?)'] are indeed Hitlerians, as you consider Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Holland, Scandinavia, Czechoslovakia and perhaps even England as belonging to 'Germany'!!! And as the Jews are particularly talented musicians, and all want to live in the capital, almost all music in Austria is concentrated in Vienna. For otherwise the musical idealists [DJ Bach et al.] would have tried years ago to make Innsbruck and Graz (for example) into significant musical centres, as Oxford and Cambridge are in England. And then your students would sing madrigals and motets, like ours, instead of making Nazi propaganda! And the workers would sing Bach and Handel, instead of proletarian choir music, which I am occasionally sent from Germany—a music that only mirrors present hardship, rather than enabling these people to find a musical heaven in which they can think of higher things for an hour."[59]
  11. ^ The Nazis also appealed to Austria's imperial history while yet recentering it within Germany proper.
  12. ^ Philip Ewell cites Erhard Karkoschka, Walter Kolneder, Heinz-Klaus Metzger, Pousseur, and Stockhausen on this point.[87]
  13. ^ When Bartók performed Schoenberg's Op. 11 (23 April 1921 in Budapest, 4 April 1922 in Paris), he omitted No. 3.[99]
  14. ^ On April 1, 1914, having already completed Op. 22/i, "Seraphita," Schoenberg wrote to Alma Mahler: "It is now my intention after a long time to once again to write a large work. ... For a long time I have been yearning for a style for large forms. My most recent development had denied this to me. Now I feel it again and I believe it will be something completely new, more than that, something that will say a great deal. ... But what I can feel of the content (this is not yet completely clear to me) is perhaps new in our time: here I shall manage to give personal things an objective, general form, behind which the author as person may withdraw."[117]
  15. ^ Scholarship varies somewhat as to the genesis of Jakobsleiter, but Auner notes a scherzo fragment dated May 27, 1914,[118] and Schoenberg wrote to Berg about setting Strindberg's Jacob lutte as early as spring 1911. Webern introduced Schoenberg to Balzac's Louis Lambert and Séraphîta on March 9, 1911.[119]
  16. ^ "Ob rechts, ob links, vorwärts oder rückwärts, bergauf oder bergab – man hat weiterzugehen, ohne zu fragen, was vor oder hinter einem liegt."
  17. ^ In 1941 Schoenberg lectured: "the ... law of the unity of musical space demands an absolute and unitary perception. In this space, as in Swedenborg's heaven (described in Balzac's Séraphîta) there is no absolute down, no right or left, forward or backward."[120]
  18. ^ Although Webern tended to inflate the actual duration of his music or to prefer slower tempi than followed in most performances, he reckoned "almost a quarter of an hour" for the first movement of Op. 21,[138] which Inbal approaches.
  19. ^ This is Krasner's phrase, by which he interprets Schoenberg's "those who tried might have succeeded in confounding us" as referring to Webern specifically.[141] But Douglas Jarman notes Schoenberg's discomfort with Berg in light of the Jewish banker scene in Act III of Lulu, though Erwin Stein and later Cehra and Perle defended Berg variously.[142] Webern sought to allay Schoenberg's concerns when asked once about his feelings toward the Nazis; similarly, when in 1938 Eduard Steuermann asked Krasner about rumors of Webern's possible "interest in and devotion to the Nazis" on Schoenberg's behalf, Krasner lied by denying the rumors categorically and entirely. As a result, Schoenberg's Violin Concerto of 1934 (or 1935)–36 continued to bear a dedication to Webern, although worded very simply ("to Anton von Webern"), as a result of Schoenberg's continuing suspicions or, indeed, on Webern's behalf, i.e., to protect Webern from further Nazi suspicion and persecution. Schoenberg and Webern continued to correspond at least through 1939.[143]
  20. ^ Schoenberg's statement was prepared for publication as a handwritten inscription by facsimile reproduction in the 1948 Editions Dynamo didactic score with analyses prepared by Leibowitz of Webern's then unpublished Op. 24,[144] which Webern had in 1934 dedicated to Schoenberg for his sixtieth birthday.
  21. ^ In 2013, the Moldenhauers' dogged investigation of Webern's once mysterious death and the experiences and testimony of those involved were portrayed in a one-act opera, The Death of Webern, which, though written in the eclectic style of its composer Michael Dellaira, paraphrases and quotes from Webern's music (e.g., the Passacaglia, Op. 1 in the third and final scenes, klangfarbenmelodie in the sixth scene).
  22. ^ Célestin Deliège [fr] also notes the relation of Votre Faust to Busoni's Doktor Faust. Ross notes its relation to Thomas Mann's Doctor Faustus.
  23. ^ Advocating for the completion of its orchestration, Adorno wrote that "Lulu is one of those works that reveals the extent of its quality the longer and more deeply one immerses oneself in it. ... Nor is there any validity to an aesthetic objecton, voiced by friends such as Hermann Scherchen: that Lulu, a traditional opera, is passé.
  24. ^ "der Ausbreitung 'postfaktischer' Tendenzen in der Musikwissenschaft"
  25. ^ Allan Benedict Ho and Dmitry Feofanov note Taruskin's "pitbull, leave-no-prisoners-behind style, overt bias, careless handling of facts, and the like."[174]
  26. ^ In a 2008 post-script to his 1996 essay "How Talented Composers Become Useless,"[176] Taruskin wrote, "The Nazis had every right to criticize Schoenberg, as do we all. It is not for their criticism that we all revile them."[177] In his Oxford History series, he compared both the tone and content of Leibowitz's Second Viennese advocacy and polemical aesthetics to the propaganda of Joseph Goebbels, found "Nazi resonances" in Eimert's "only composers who follow Webern are worthy of the name," and compared Boulez's "[s]ince the Viennese discoveries, any musician who has not experienced ... the necessity of dodecaphonic language is USELESS" to the Zhdanov Doctrine.[178] Though Taruskin cited Krasner in claiming that Webern joyfully welcomed the Nazis with the Anschluss,[179] Krasner told Fanfare that Webern "packed [him] off quickly" as soon he turned on the radio and heard the news break rather "for my safety ... [b]ut perhaps ... also to avoid the embarrassment which my presence would have caused had his family arrived, or friends celebrating the Nazi entry into Austria."[43]
  27. ^ While sympathetic to the critical orientation of Taruskin's equations, Holzer found them inappropriate and simplistic, contextualizing Boulez then as a cocky 25-year-old.
  28. ^ Rosen charged that Taruskin's "hostile presentation of much of the twentieth century does not result in historical objectivity."[171]
  29. ^ Erwin singled out Taruskin's account of the Darmstädter Ferienkurse as "thoroughly discredited," noting that "he not infrequently attributes this sort of power to composers and theorists of the post-war avant-garde," for example, "that Adorno or Leibowitz officiated with near-dictatorial power over the institutional apparatus of post-war New Music."
  30. ^ Powell wrote that "Richard Taruskin's recent references to Webern's politics are tendentiously meant to discredit the music."[180]
  31. ^ Utz agreed with Zenck that Taruskin makes "rather blunt ... simplifying and distorting equation[s]," while averring with Taruskin that "there is no such thing as 'apolitical music'" and acknowledging that "an authoritarian rhetoric that spoke of the 'worthlessness' of contrary aesthetic attitudes, or the 'eradication' or 'extinction' of certain residues of past styles, is found everywhere in the writings of the 1950s and 60s."[181]
  32. ^ "Darmstadt in ein 'faschistoides' Eck zu stellen oder es gar als Propagandainstitution der USA im Kalten Krieg auszuweisen"
  33. ^ "unglaublichen Verdrehungen, Übertreibungen, Verkürzungen und Propagierungen von Klischeebildern"

ReferencesEdit

  1. ^ Johnson 2006, 198–199.
  2. ^ Shreffler 1994, 21–22.
  3. ^ Emmery 2020, 72–82.
  4. ^ Clements 2022; Miller 2022a, 99
  5. ^ Moldenhauer and Moldenhauer 1978, 30–31.
  6. ^ Hayes 1995, 18.
  7. ^ Hayes 1995, 20.
  8. ^ Johnson 1999, 83.
  9. ^ Hayes 1995, 19; Johnson 1999, 21, 220
  10. ^ Johnson 1999, 99.
  11. ^ Johnson 1999, 20–23.
  12. ^ Johnson 1999, 102.
  13. ^ Johnson 1999, 57, 80.
  14. ^ Johnson 1999, 22, 38, 74–75, 79, 86, 94, 128.
  15. ^ Johnson 1999, 252.
  16. ^ Johnson 1999, 72–77.
  17. ^ a b Bailey Puffett 1998, 35.
  18. ^ Moldenhauer and Moldenhauer 1978, 510.
  19. ^ Bailey Puffett 1996, 32.
  20. ^ Johnson 2006, 197.
  21. ^ Stewart 1991, 187.
  22. ^ Leinsdorf 1997, 13.
  23. ^ Holland, Bernard (12 September 1993). "Erich Leinsdorf, 81, a Conductor of Intelligence and Utility, Is Dead". The New York Times.; Moldenhauer 1961, 327; Antokoletz 2014, 75, 225
  24. ^ Toorn and McGinness 2012, 43–52, 67–75, 124–126; Peyser 2008, 80–81; Sills 2022, 48–49, 84, 119–123
  25. ^ Leeuw 2005, 56–58; Moldenhauer and Moldenhauer 1978, 431–439; Puffett 1996, 63
  26. ^ a b Leeuw 2005, 161.
  27. ^ Sills 2022, 48–49, 119–126, 284–285.
  28. ^ Maes 2002, 284–285; Taruskin 1996b, 383–413
  29. ^ Ewell 2013, 219–223, 242; Hába 1934, 15–17
  30. ^ Bailey Puffett 1998, 121; Moldenhauer and Moldenhauer 1978, 292, 450
  31. ^ Perle 1980, 201.
  32. ^ a b Stewart 1991, 188.
  33. ^ Bailey Puffett 1998, 164; Stewart 1991, 187
  34. ^ Krasner and Seibert 1987, 337–338.
  35. ^ Bailey Puffett 1998, 161, 165; Moldenhauer and Moldenhauer 1978, 473–475, 478, 491, 498–499; Taruskin 2008a, 211–212
  36. ^ Notley 2010.
  37. ^ Adorno and Berg 2005, 85, 89.
  38. ^ a b c Bailey Puffett 1998, 161.
  39. ^ Webern 1963, 7, 19–20.
  40. ^ Krasner and Seibert 1987, 341.
  41. ^ Krasner and Seibert 1987, 338.
  42. ^ Greissle-Schönberg 2003b.
  43. ^ a b c Krasner and Seibert 1987.
  44. ^ Shreffler 1999, 299.
  45. ^ Bailey Puffett 1998, 86, 165.
  46. ^ Bailey Puffett 1998, 86, 169.
  47. ^ Simms and Erwin 2021, 375.
  48. ^ a b Perle 1980, 19–24.
  49. ^ Botstein 2010, 330; Schwartz 2017, 85–91
  50. ^ Broué 1971, 13–14.
  51. ^ a b Adorno and Berg 2005, 85.
  52. ^ Simms and Erwin 2021, 215.
  53. ^ Ho 2011, 117–118.
  54. ^ Perle 1980, 199.
  55. ^ Johnson 2006, 199; Simms and Erwin 2021, 375
  56. ^ Moldenhauer and Moldenhauer 1978, 517–518.
  57. ^ Fulbrook 2011, 1920.
  58. ^ Adorno and Berg 2005, 248.
  59. ^ Adorno and Berg 2005, 249–250.
  60. ^ Simms and Erwin 2021, 375–376; Wodak 2009, 52
  61. ^ Hochman 2016, 35, 239.
  62. ^ Bailey Puffett 1998, 86, 167; Moldenhauer and Moldenhauer 1978, 641–643
  63. ^ Bailey Puffett 1998, 86, 174.
  64. ^ Moldenhauer and Moldenhauer 1978, 527.
  65. ^ Ross 2007, 352.
  66. ^ Moldenhauer and Moldenhauer 1978, 516–519.
  67. ^ a b Schoenberg 2018, 209.
  68. ^ Bailey Puffett 1998, 86, 105, 173; Krasner and Seibert 1987; Webern 1967
  69. ^ Bailey Puffett 1998, 86, 166.
  70. ^ a b c Bailey Puffett 1998, 183.
  71. ^ Moldenhauer and Moldenhauer 1978, 600–601.
  72. ^ a b Greissle-Schönberg 2003a.
  73. ^ Moldenhauer 1961, 85, 102, 1141–16; Moldenhauer and Moldenhauer 1978, 632
  74. ^ Moldenhauer and Moldenhauer 1978, 638–643.
  75. ^ Moldenhauer and Moldenhauer 1978, 113.
  76. ^ Adorno 2004, 418.
  77. ^ Adorno 1984, 448.
  78. ^ Webern 2000.
  79. ^ Johnson 1999, 128; Prausnitz 2002, 261; Doctor 1999, 200; Paddison 1998, 51; Auner 1999, 14; Perle 1990, 45
  80. ^ Babbitt 2003, 54.
  81. ^ Hayes 2021, 9.
  82. ^ Clark 2001, 573.
  83. ^ Antokoletz 2014, 44; Bailey Puffett 1991, 14, 31–35, 94, 107–109, 125, 418; Johnson 1999, p. 165
  84. ^ Hába 1934, 15–17.
  85. ^ Ewell 2013, 242.
  86. ^ Ewell 2013, 220–223.
  87. ^ Ewell 2013, 219–221.
  88. ^ Bailey Puffett 1991, 47; Hayes 2021, 9
  89. ^ Antokoletz 2014, 44–47; Baragwanath 1999, 62–83
  90. ^ Meyer and Shreffler 1996, 136; Shere 2007, 7
  91. ^ Chen 2006; Puffett 1996, 38; Yang 1987, vi
  92. ^ Fitch 2000.
  93. ^ Hayes 1995, 71.
  94. ^ Johnson 1999, 42–45.
  95. ^ Johnson 1999, 211–236.
  96. ^ Bailey Puffett 1996, 147, 150, 195.
  97. ^ Busoni 1987, 388–9; Haimo 2010, 100–104; Moldenhauer and Moldenhauer 1978, 123–125, 706–707
  98. ^ Johnson 1999, 149.
  99. ^ Krones 2017, 125.
  100. ^ Haimo 2010, 100–104.
  101. ^ Haimo 2006, 318–352.
  102. ^ Miller 2022b; Moldenhauer and Moldenhauer 1978, 263–264, 269–272, 712–713
  103. ^ Pino 1980, 200.
  104. ^ Dolan and Rehding 2021, 135, 144, 157–159, 183, 514, 527–529, 534.
  105. ^ a b Miller 2022b.
  106. ^ Johnson 1999, 149–150; Shreffler 1994, 131–132
  107. ^ Johnson 1999, 129.
  108. ^ Johnson 1999, 149–150.
  109. ^ a b Johnson 1999, 121.
  110. ^ Johnson 1999, 105–108.
  111. ^ Johnson 1999, 112, 121.
  112. ^ Johnson 1999, 94, 110–112.
  113. ^ Johnson 1999, 57.
  114. ^ Johnson 1999, 110–112.
  115. ^ Johnson 1999, 125.
  116. ^ Johnson 1999, 141, 201.
  117. ^ Auner 2003, 123–124.
  118. ^ Auner 2003, 123–125; Berry 2008, 86; Smither 2001, 678
  119. ^ Brown 2011, 120.
  120. ^ Schoenberg 1950, 113.
  121. ^ Service 2013.
  122. ^ Perle 1995, 125.
  123. ^ Shere 2007, 10.
  124. ^ Schmusch 1995, 223, 226–230.
  125. ^ a b Moldenhauer and Moldenhauer 1978, 576–578.
  126. ^ Bailey Puffett 2001.
  127. ^ Moldenhauer and Moldenhauer 1978, 742.
  128. ^ Moldenhauer and Moldenhauer 1978, 67, 746.
  129. ^ Moldenhauer and Moldenhauer 1978, 237.
  130. ^ Merrick 1987, 31.
  131. ^ Moldenhauer and Moldenhauer 1978, 282.
  132. ^ Arnold 2002, 386–387; Merrick 1987, 31
  133. ^ Moldenhauer and Moldenhauer 1978, 470–471, 679–680.
  134. ^ Moldenhauer and Moldenhauer 1978, 470–471.
  135. ^ Jackson 2005, 465.
  136. ^ Johnson 1999, p. 216.
  137. ^ Horowitz, Joseph (11 January 1981). "Felix Galimir Recalls Berg and Webern in Vienna". The New York Times.
  138. ^ Moldenhauer and Moldenhauer 1978, 693.
  139. ^ LLC, New York Media (9 April 1979). New York Magazine. New York Media, LLC.
  140. ^ Moldenhauer and Moldenhauer 1978, 693; Stravinsky 1959
  141. ^ a b Krasner and Seibert 1987, 346–47.
  142. ^ Jarman 2017; Perle 1985, 283–284
  143. ^ Arnold Schönberg Center n.d.; Kater 1999, clv; Krasner and Seibert 1987, 345
  144. ^ Leibowitz 2018, 2, 5, 7, 11, 13, 81, 83, 86.
  145. ^ a b c d Ross 2007, 267.
  146. ^ a b Grant 2001, 103.
  147. ^ Fosler-Lussier 2007, 38.
  148. ^ Taruskin 2009, 15–18.
  149. ^ a b Erwin 2020, p. 93–94.
  150. ^ Grant 2001, 104.
  151. ^ Goeyvaerts 1994, 39; Grant 2001, 104
  152. ^ Iddon 2013, 250.
  153. ^ Moldenhauer and Moldenhauer 1978, 292, 450, 516–517; Morgan 1993, 79
  154. ^ Alegant 2010, 38–46, 103–105, 292.
  155. ^ Alegant 2010, 74–83, 103–105.
  156. ^ "Tom Mulhern's Interview with Frank Zappa, 1983".
  157. ^ Erwin 2020, 93.
  158. ^ Ehman 2013, p. 178.
  159. ^ Bregegere 2014, 147; Pousseur 2009, 227
  160. ^ Berg 1957.
  161. ^ Antokoletz and Susanni 2011, xxix.
  162. ^ Suchoff 2004, 22.
  163. ^ Krones 2017, 56.
  164. ^ Krones 2017, 123–124.
  165. ^ Fosler-Lussier 2007, 49.
  166. ^ Frandzel 2002; Krones 2017, 122–124
  167. ^ Johnson 2015, 53–54.
  168. ^ Johnson 2015, 59–65.
  169. ^ Johnson 2015, 34.
  170. ^ Sitsky 2002, 183–185.
  171. ^ a b Rosen 2012, 246.
  172. ^ Potter 2005, 446.
  173. ^ Robin, William (1 July 2022). "Richard Taruskin, Vigorously Polemical Musicologist, Dies at 77". The New York Times.; Mitchinson 2001, 34 MacDonald n.d.; Kosman 2014; Forte 1986, 321; Schuijer 2008, 23
  174. ^ Ho 2011, 200.
  175. ^ Bick 2009; Eichner 2012, 28; Taruskin 2008b, 397; White 2008, 203
  176. ^ Taruskin 1996a.
  177. ^ Taruskin 2008c, 92.
  178. ^ Taruskin 2009, 18–19.
  179. ^ Taruskin 2008a, 211–212.
  180. ^ Powell 2013, 3.
  181. ^ Utz 2021, 114.
  182. ^ Cox 2011, 1,36–38,53.
  183. ^ Taruskin 2011, 3.

BibliographyEdit

  • Adorno, Theodor. 1984. Musikalische Schriften, Vol. 5. Gesammelte Schriften, Vol. 18. Suhrkamp Verlag ISBN 978-3-518-57696-0.
  • Adorno, Theodor. 2004. Aesthetic Theory. Impacts Series. A&C Black. ISBN 978-0-8264-7691-3.
  • Adorno, Theodor W. and Alban Berg. 2005. Correspondence 1925–1935. Edited by Henri Lonitz. [Translated by Wieland Hoban]. Cambridge, UK and Malden, MA: Polity Press. ISBN 978-0-745-62336-8. (Translation of Briefwechsel 1925–1935. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag, 1997.)
  • Alegant, Brian. 2010. The Twelve-tone Music of Luigi Dallapiccola. Rochester: University of Rochester Press. ISBN 978-1-58046-325-6.
  • Antokoletz, Elliott. 2014. A History of Twentieth-Century Music in a Theoretic–Analytical Context. New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-88187-6 (hbk).
  • Antokoletz, Elliott, and Paolo Susanni. 2011. Béla Bartók: A Research and Information Guide, third edition. New York, NY: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-203-88889-6.
  • Arnold, Ben (ed.). 2002. The Liszt Companion. Jazz Companions Series. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. ISBN 978-0-313-30689-1 (accessed 9 August 2014).
  • Arnold Schönberg Center. n.d. "Concerto for Violin and Orchestra Op. 36". Werk- und Quellendatenbank: Werke mit Opuszahlen (op. 26–50c). Vienna: Arnold Schönberg Center (accessed 9 August 2014).
  • Auner, Joseph. 1999. "The Second Viennese School as a Historical Concept." In Schoenberg, Berg, and Webern: A Companion to the Second Viennese School, edited by Bryan R. Simms, 1–36. Westport CT and London: Greenwood Press. ISBN 978-0-313-29604-8.
  • Auner, Joseph. 2003. A Schoenberg Reader. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-12712-6.
  • Babbitt, Milton. 2003. "The Composer as Specialist." In The Collected Essays of Milton Babbitt, edited by Stephen Peles, with Stephen Dembski, Andrew Mead, and Joseph N. Straus, 48–54. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-15540-1.
  • Bailey Puffett, Kathryn. 1991. The Twelve-Note Music of Anton Webern: Old Forms in a New Language. Music in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-39088-0 (hbk). ISBN 978-0-521-54796-3 (pbk).
  • Bailey Puffett, Kathryn (ed.). 1996. Webern Studies. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-47526-6.
  • Bailey Puffett, Kathryn. 1998. The Life of Webern. Musical Lives. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-57336-8 (cloth) ISBN 978-0-521-57566-9 (pbk).
  • Bailey Puffett, Kathryn. 2001. "Webern, Anton." Grove Music Online (accessed 9 October 2022).
  • Baragwanath, Nicholas. 1999. "Alban Berg, Richard Wagner, and Leitmotivs of Symmetry." 19th-century Music 23(1):62–83.
  • Berg, Alban. 1957. Écrits, ed. and trans. Henri Pousseur. Monaco: Editions du Rocher. Enlarged edition, ed. Dominique Jameaux et al., Paris: Christian Bourgois, 1985.
  • Berry, Mark. 2008. "Arnold Schoenberg's 'Biblical Way': From 'Die Jakobsleiter' to 'Moses und Aron'." Music & Letters 89(1):84–108.
  • Bick, Andreas, 2009. "Richard Taruskin: The Danger of Music". Silent Listening blog (accessed 2 August 2014).
  • Botstein, Leon. 2010. "Alban Berg and the Memory of Modernism." In Alban Berg and His World, edited by Christopher Hailey, 299–344. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-14855-7 (hbk). ISBN 978-0-691-14856-4 (pbk).
  • Bregegere, Andre. 2014. "L'harmonie revée: An Analysis of Henri Pousseur's Votre Faust and Les litanies d'Icare". PhD diss. New York: City University of New York.
  • Broué, Pierre. 1971. The German Revolution 1917–1923, trans. John Archer, eds. Ian Birchall and Brian Pearce, intro. by Eric D. Weitz. Historical Materialism Series. Reprinted, Chicago: Haymarket Books. 2006. ISBN 978-1-931-85932-5 (pbk).
  • Brown, Julie. 2011. "Understanding Schoenberg as Christ". In The Oxford Handbook of the New Cultural History of Music, edited by Jane F. Fulcher, 117–162. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-199-35409-2.
  • Busoni, Ferruccio. 1987. Ferruccio Busoni: Selected Letters, edited, translated, and with an introduction by Antony Beaumont New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Chen, Stephanie Hui-Shan. 2006. Webern's Reception in the Post-War Era. Self-published on author's web page (accessed 4 July 2018).
  • Clark, Duncan. 2001. "Anton Webern." In Classical Music: The Rough Guide, edited by Joe Staines, 572–575. Rough Guides. London: Rough Guides Ltd. ISBN 978-1-85828-721-8.
  • Clements, Andrew. 2022. "The Complete Music of Anton Webern review – hugely influential recordings of jewel-like works". The Guardian.com (6 January, accessed 18 September 2022).
  • Cox, Franklin. 2011. Review: Richard Taruskin's The Oxford History of Western Music, Part 1. Search Journal for New Music and Culture, no. 9 (Winter 2012), http://www.searchnewmusic.org/cox_review.pdf
  • Doctor, Jennifer. 1999. The BBC and Ultra-Modern Music, 1922–1936: Shaping a Nation's Tastes.
  • Dolan, Emily and Alexander Rehding, eds. 2021. The Oxford Handbook of Timbre. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-190-63725-5 (ebk). ISBN 978-0-190-63722-4 (hbk).
  • Ehman, Caroline. 2013. "Reimagining Faust in Postmodern Opera". PhD diss. Rochester: Eastman School of Music, University of Rochester.
  • Eichner, Barbara. 2012. History in Mighty Sounds: Musical Constructions of German National Identity, 1848–1914. Music in Society and Culture 1. Boydell Press. ISBN 978-1-84383-754-1.
  • Emmery, Laura. 2020. Compositional Process in Elliott Carter's String Quartets: A Study in Sketches. Ashgate Studies in Theory and Analysis of Music After 1900. London and New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-367-15132-4 (hbk). ISBN 978-0-429-05525-6 (ebk).
  • Erwin, Max. 2020. "Who is Buried in Webern's Tomb? Orientations in the Reception of Serial Music from Messiaen to Stockhausen." Perspectives of New Music 58(2), 93–128.
  • Ewell, Philip A. 2013. "Russian Pitch-Class Set Analysis and the Music of Webern." Gamut: Music Theory Society of the Mid-Atlantic, Vol. 6: Iss. 1, Article 7: 219–276
  • Fitch, Fabrice. 2000. Webern Complete Edition. The Gramophone. Vol. 78: 74 (accessed 18 September 2022).(subscription required)
  • Forte, Allen. 1986. "Letter to the Editor in Reply to Richard Taruskin from Allen Forte: Making Stravinsky Soup and Other Epistemusicological Pursuits: A Hymenopteran Response". Music Analysis 5, nos. 2–3 (July–October): 321–337.(subscription required)
  • Fosler-Lussier, Danielle. 2007. Music Divided: Bartók's Legacy in Cold War Culture, Vol. 7. Los Angeles: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-24965-3.
  • Frandzel, Benjamin. 2002. "A Canon Across Time: György Kurtág's Officium Breve in memoriam Andreae Szervánszky, op. 28". Studia Musicologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 43, nos. 3–4 (June): 383–396.(subscription required)
  • Fulbrook, Mary. 2011. A History of Germany 1918–2008: The Divided Nation, third edition. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1-4443-5972-5
  • Goeyvaerts, Karel. 1994. "Paris: Darmstadt 1947–1956: Excerpt from the Autobiographical Portrait", translated by Patrick Daly, Peter Vosch, and Roger Janssens. Revue belge de Musicologie / Belgisch Tijdschrift voor Muziekwetenschap 48 (The Artistic Legacy of Karel Goeyvaerts. A Collection of Essays): 35–54.
  • Grant, M. J. 2001. Serial Music, Serial Aesthetics: Compositional Theory in Post-War Europe. Music in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-61992-9.
  • Greissle-Schönberg, Arnold. 2003a. "Chapter Four: Georg (Görgi) Schönberg: My Favorite Uncle". Arnold Schönberg's European Family website (accessed 2 August 2014).
  • Greissle-Schönberg, Arnold. 2003b. "Chapter Five: 1938: Austria Vanishes". Arnold Schönberg's European Family website (accessed 2 August 2014).
  • Hába, Alois. 1934. "Schönberg und die weiteren möglichkeiten der musikentwicklung." In Arnold Schönberg zum 60. Geburtstag, 13. September 1934, edited by Hildegard Jone, 15–17. Vienna: Universal Edition.
  • Haimo, Ethan. 2006. Schoenberg's Transformation of Musical Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-86542-5.
  • Haimo, Ethan. 2010. "The Rise and Fall of Radical Athematicism". In The Cambridge Companion to Schoenberg, edited by Joseph Auner and Jennifer Shaw, 94–107. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-139-82807-9.
  • Hayes, Aaron. 2021. Concepts of Time in Post-War European Music. London and New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-20096-0 (ebk). ISBN 978-0-367-19192-4 (hbk).
  • Hayes, Malcolm. 1995. Anton von Webern. London: Phaidon Press. ISBN 978-0-7148-3157-2.
  • Hochman, Erin R. 2016. Imagining a Greater Germany: Republican Nationalism and the Idea of Anschluss. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. ISBN 978-1-501-70444-4.
  • Ho, Allan B. and Dmitry Feofanov. 2011, rev 2014. The Shostakovich Wars. https://www.siue.edu/~aho/ShostakovichWars/SW.pdf
  • Iddon, Martin. 2013. New Music at Darmstadt: Nono, Stockhausen, Cage, and Boulez. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-03329-0.
  • Jackson, Roland John. 2005. Performance Practice: A Dictionary-guide for Musicians. New York and London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-4159-4139-6
  • Jarman, Douglas. 2017. "'Frisch, Fromm, Fröhlich, Frei': The Deutscher Turnerbund and the Berg Violin Concerto." Musicologica Austriaca: Journal for Austrian Music Studies (accessed 2 November 2022).
  • Johnson, Julian. 1999. Webern and the Transformation of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-66149-2.
  • Johnson, Julius. 2006. "Anton Webern, the Social Democratic Kunstelle and Musical Modernism." Austrian Studies 14, no. 1: 197–213.
  • Johnson, Victoria. 2015. "Notes from the Underground: Explorations of Dissent in the Music of Czech-born Composers Marek Kopelent and Petr Kotík". MA thesis. Phoenix: Arizona State University.
  • Kater, Michael. 1999. Composers of the Nazi Era: Eight Portraits. Oxford University Press.
  • Kosman, Joshua. 2014. "UC Music Historian Richard Taruskin Relishes Provocateur Role". SFGate webzine (31 May). San Francisco Chronicle website
  • Krasner, Louis, and Don C. Seibert. "Some Memories of Anton Webern, the Berg Concerto, and Vienna in the 1930s." Fanfare (November–December 1987): 335–347(subscription required)
  • Krones, Hartmut, Helmut Loos and Klaus-Peter Koc, eds. 2017. Die Rezeption der Wiener Schule in Osteuropa. Musikgeschichte in Mittel- und Osteuropa: Mitteilungen der internationalen Arbeitsgemeinschaft an der Universität Leipzig 19. Leipzig: Gudrun Schröder Verlag. ISBN 978-3-926196-76-7.
  • Leeuw, Ton de. 2005. Music of the Twentieth Century: A Study of Its Elements and Structure, translated from the Dutch by Stephen Taylor. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. ISBN 978-90-5356-765-4. Translation of Muziek van de twintigste eeuw: een onderzoek naar haar elementen en structuur. Utrecht: Oosthoek, 1964. Third impression, Utrecht: Bohn, Scheltema & Holkema, 1977. ISBN 978-90-313-0244-4.
  • Leibowitz, René. 2018. René Leibowitz to Editions Dynamo: The 114 Letters of René Leibowitz to the Editions Dynamo of Pierre Aelberts Between 1947 and 1951, edited by Tobias Broeker. Stuttgart. Self-published on author's web site (accessed 9 October 2022).
  • Leinsdorf, Erich. 1997. Erich Leinsdorf on Music. Portland: Amadeus Press. ISBN 978-1-574-67028-8.
  • MacDonald, Ian. n.d.. "The Shostakovich Debate: The Question of Dissidence (5)". Music under Soviet Rule. Southern Illinois University Edwardsville website.
  • Maes, Francis. 2002. A History of Russian Music From Kamarinskaya to Babi Yar''. [Translated by Arnold J. Pomerans and Erica Pomerans]. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. (Translation of Geschiedenis van de Russische muziek: Van Kamarinskaja tot Babi Jar. Nijmegen: Uitgeverij SUN, 1996.) ISBN 978-0-520-21815-4.
  • Merrick, Paul. 1987. Revolution and Religion in the Music of Liszt. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-32627-8.
  • Meyer, Felix, and Anne Shreffler. 1996. "Performance and Revision: The Early History of Webern's Four Pieces for Violin and Piano, Op. 7". In Webern Studies, edited by Kathryn Bailey Puffett, 135–169. Cambridge Composer Studies. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-47526-6.
  • Miller, David H. Spring 2022. "Singing Webern, Sounding Webern: Bethany Beardslee, Grace-Lynne Martin, and Marni Nixon, 1950–1957". Journal of the American Musicological Society. 75(1):81–127. University of California Press.
  • Miller, David H. 2022. "Shadows, wraiths, and amoebas: the distinctive flops of Anton Webern in the United States". Transposition. 10. École des hautes études en sciences sociales (EHESS) and the Cité de la musique-Philharmonie de Paris. (30 May, accessed 26 October 2022)
  • Mitchinson, Paul. 2001. "Richard Taruskin Explores the Dark Side of Music". Lingua Franca 11, no. 5 (July–August), 34–43.
  • Moldenhauer, Hans. 1961. The Death of Anton Webern: A Drama in Documents. New York: Philosophical Library. OCLC 512111
  • Moldenhauer, Hans, and Rosaleen Moldenhauer. 1978. Anton von Webern: A Chronicle of His Life and Work. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. ISBN 978-0-394-47237-9 London: Gollancz. ISBN 978-0-575-02436-6.
  • Morgan, Robert P. 1993. Modern Times: From World War I to the Present. Man & Music Series; Vol. 8. London: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-1-349-11291-3 (ebk). ISBN 978-1-349-11293-7 (hbk).
  • Notley, Margaret. 2010. "[1934, Alban Berg, and the Shadow of Politics: Documents of a Troubled Year]". In Alban Berg and His World, edited by Christopher Hailey, 223–268. The Bard Music Festival. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-1-4008-3647-5.
  • Paddison, Max. 1998. Adorno's Aesthetics of Music. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-62608-8
  • Perle, George. 1980. The Operas of Alban Berg, Vol. I: Wozzeck. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-06617-5.
  • Perle, George. 1985. The Operas of Alban Berg, Vol. II: Lulu. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-06616-8.
  • Perle, George. 1990. The Right Notes: Twenty-Three Selected Essays by George Perle on Twentieth-Century Music. Stuyvesant: Pendragon Press. ISBN 978-0-945-19337-1.
  • Perle, George. 1995. The Listening Composer. Berkeley: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-20518-5.
  • Peyser, Joan. 2008. To Boulez and Beyond. Revised ed. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press. ISBN 978-1-4616-9776-3.
  • Pino, David. 1980. The Clarinet and Clarinet Playing. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons. Reprinted, Mineola, NY: Dover Publications, Inc. 1998. ISBN 978-0-486-40270-3 (pbk).
  • Potter, Pamela M. 2005. "What Is 'Nazi Music'?". The Musical Quarterly 88, no. 3 (July): 428–455. doi:10.1093/musqtl/gdi019.
  • Pousseur, Henri. 2009. "Harmonie? Harmonies! (1995)". In Série et harmonie généralisées: une théorie de la composition musicale. Selected and edited by Pascal Decroupet, 225–242. Collection Musique-Musicologie. Wavre: Mardaga. ISBN 978-2-804-70013-3.
  • Powell, Larson. 2013. "Karl Amadeus Hartmann: The Politics of Musical Inner Emigration." Search Journal for New Music and Culture, no. 10 (Fall 2013), http://www.searchnewmusic.org/powell_hartmann.pdf
  • Prausnitz, Frederik. 2002. Roger Sessions: How a "Difficult" Composer Got That Way. Cary, NC: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-195-10892-7.
  • Puffett, Derrick. 1996. "Gone with the Summer Wind; or, What Webern Lost: Nine Variations on a Ground." In Webern Studies, edited by Kathryn Bailey Puffett, 32–73. Cambridge Composer Studies. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-47526-6.
  • Rosen, Charles. 2012. Freedom and the Arts: Essays on Music and Literature. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press. ISBN 978-0-674-04752-5
  • Ross, Alex. 2007. The Rest Is Noise: Listening to the Twentieth Century. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, ISBN 978-0-374-24939-7.
  • Schoenberg, Arnold. 1950. Style and Idea, ed. Dika Newlin. New York: Philosophical Library, Inc.
  • Schoenberg, Arnold. 2018. Schoenberg's Correspondence with American Composers, ed. and trans. Sabine Feisst. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-195-38357-7 (hbk).
  • Schuijer, Michiel. 2008. "Analyzing Atonal Music: Pitch-class Set Theory and Its Contexts". Eastman Studies in Music. Rochester: University of Rochester Press. ISBN 978-1-58046-270-9 (hbk).
  • Schmusch, Rainer. 1995. "Klangfarbenmelodie." In Terminologie der Musik im 20. Jahrhundert, edited by Hans Heinrich Eggebrecht, 221–234. Handwörterbuch der musikalischen Terminologie. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag. ISBN 978-3-51506-659-4.
  • Schwartz, Peter J. 2017. "'Guckt euch selbst an!' Büchner's Woyzeck and the Pericope Adulterae." In Georg Büchner: Contemporary Perspectives, edited by Robert Gillett, 79–91. Leiden: Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-34163-0 (ebk). ISBN 978-90-04-33859-3 (hbk).
  • Service, Tom. 2013. "Symphony Guide: Webern's Op 21". Tom Service on Classical Blog. The Guardian.com (17 December, accessed 2 August 2014).
  • Shere, David Matthew. 2007. "A Survey of Webern's Life and Compositional Vocabulary". PhD diss. Santa Barbara: University of California, Santa Barbara. ISBN 978-0-549-26874-1.
  • Shreffler, Anne C. 1994. Webern and the Lyric Impulse: Songs and Fragments on Poems of Georg Trakl. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-198-16224-7.
  • Shreffler, Anne C. 1999. "Anton Webern". In Schoenberg, Berg, and Webern: A Companion to the Second Viennese School, edited by Bryan R. Simms, 251–314. Westport, Connecticut and London: Greenwood Press, 1999. ISBN 978-0-313-29604-8.
  • Sills, Helen. 2022. Stravinsky, God, and Time. Leiden: Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-51853-7 (ebk). ISBN 978-90-04-51853-7 (hbk).
  • Simms, Bryan R. and Charlotte Erwin. 2021. Berg. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-190-93144-5 (hbk).
  • Sitsky, Larry, ed. 2002. Music of the Twentieth-century Avant-garde: A Biocritical Sourcebook. Foreword by Jonathan D. Kramer. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press. ISBN 978-031-3-29689-5 (pbk).
  • Smither, Howard E. 2001. A History of the Oratorio, Vol. 4: The Oratorio in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Chapel Hill and London: The University of North Carolina Press.
  • Stewart, John Lincoln. 1991. Ernst Krenek: The Man and His Music. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-07014-1.
  • Stravinsky, Igor. 1959. "[Foreword]". Die Reihe 2 (2nd revised English edition): vii.
  • Suchoff, Benjamin. 2004. Béla Bartók: A Celebration. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press. ISBN 978-081-0-84958-7 (hbk).
  • Taruskin, Richard, 1996. "Classical View: How Talented Composers Become Useless". Archives (10 March). New York Times website (accessed 2 August 2014).
  • Taruskin, Richard. 1996. Stravinsky and the Russian Traditions, Vol. II: A Biography of the Works Through Mavra. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-07099-8.
  • Taruskin, Richard. 2008a. "The Dark Side of the Moon". The Danger of Music and Other Anti-Utopian Essays, 202–216. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-24977-6.
  • Taruskin, Richard. 2008b. "Back to Whom? Neoclassicism as Ideology". The Danger of Music and Other Anti-Utopian Essays, 382–405. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-94279-0.
  • Taruskin, Richard. 2008c. "How Talented Composers Become Useless". The Danger of Music and Other Anti-Utopian Essays, 86–93. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-94279-0.
  • Taruskin, Richard. Music in the Late Twentieth Century. The Oxford History of Western Music, Vol. 5. Revised edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-195-38485-7.
  • Taruskin, Richard. 2011. "'Alte Musik' or 'Early Music'?". Twentieth-Century Music, 8, No. 1 (March): 3–28. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/S1478572211000260.
  • Toorn, Pieter van den and John McGinness. 2012. Stravinsky and the Russian Period: Sound and Legacy of a Musical Idiom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107-02100-6 (hbk).
  • Utz, Christian. Musical Composition in the Context of Globalization: New Perspectives on Music History in the 20th and 21st Century, edited by Wieland Hoban. [Translated by Laurence Sinclair Willis.] Revised and expanded edition. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag. ISBN 978-3-837-65095-2.
  • Webern, Anton. 1963. The Path to the New Music. Edited by Willi Reich [de]. [Translated by Leo Black.] Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania: Theodore Presser Co., in Association with Universal Edition. Reprinted London: Universal Edition, 1975. (Translation of Wege zur neuen Musik. Vienna: Universal Edition, 1960.)
  • Webern, Anton. 1967. "Letters to Hildegard Jone and Josef Humplik", edited by Josef Polnauer, translated by Cornelius Cardew and Élisabeth Bouillon. Bryn Mawr: Theodore Presser; London, Vienna, and Zürich: Universal Edition.
  • Webern, Anton. 2000. Sämtliche Werke/Complete Works/L'Œuvre complète/L'opera completa. Oelze · Pollet · Schneider · McCormick · Finley · Aimard · Cascioli · Maisenberg · Zimerman · Kremer · Hagen · BBC Singers · Emerson String Quartet · Ensemble Intercontemporain · Berliner Philharmoniker · Pierre Boulez. 6-CD set. Deutsche Grammophon 0289 457 6372 9 GX 6. Hamburg: Deutsche Grammophon.
  • White, Harry. 2008. Music and the Irish Literary Imagination. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-156316-4.
  • Wodak, Ruth. The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh University Press, 2009.
  • Yang, Tsung-Hsien. "Webern Symphony: Beyond Palindromes and Canons". PhD diss. Waltham, Massachusetts: Brandeis University, 1987.

Further readingEdit

External linksEdit