Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women/Archive 13
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | → | Archive 17 |
Can anyone help to get this article approved? It is about a woman who is deputy mayor of Jerusalem. A male reviewer decided many months that being a deputy mayor does not confer notability! Can anyone help? It has been the on waiting list for review since May. We are talking about an article that has many solid references and the subject is a notable woman who is working to better the city of Jerusalem and the welfare of women.--Geewhiz (talk) 05:23, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of List of ACM-W Celebrations for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of ACM-W Celebrations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of ACM-W Celebrations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cypherquest (talk)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
 Hello, |
As a heads up, the alerts will now report proposals for mergers and splits, as well as AFC submissions. There's a bit of a backlog, but now you have a way to track it! Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 02:03, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
Review of Yum China CEO page
Hello! My name is Monica and I work for Yum China. I am looking for editors to review the article for the company's CEO Joey Wat.
As explanation: I created a Wikipedia account to suggest improvements to articles related to the company, including CEO Joey Wat. In the past, we at Yum China weren't aware we needed to explain our conflict of interest. We have since learned about the site's policies and have disclosed at Talk:Joey Wat.
There were two tags on the article added following edits made by my colleague before we were aware of the rules. I have been looking into how these should be dealt with. The editor who accepted submission at Articles for Creation removed the undisclosed payments tag, but the COI tag remains. The editor who added the COI tag seems to think I offer paid Wikipedia-editing services, which is not true. If there is any problematic content, I can take steps to help address and I am happy to do so, but so far no editors have confirmed which text is inappropriate. I'm now seeking wider input. Can someone from this project take a look at the article and share any concerns, or explain what's needed to remove the tag? There is further discussion at Talk:Joey Wat. Thanks, MX Yum China (talk) 07:48, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
hi all, just added a couple of women projects to Wright's talkpage, i was quite shocked at the article's sorry state for such an iconic mother goose illustrator (it hasnt been improved much since its creation in 2005!), and thought i'd mention it here hoping that some editors may be able to add to it (i know i should be improving it but...
). Coolabahapple (talk) 08:49, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Coolabahapple: Couldn't find much but have enlarged it a bit - found a source saying that not a lot was known about her life. Can't be sure about her dates - there's some fairly confusing and unconvincing genealogical stuff on the talk page. The book I found, Women Illustrators of the Golden Age might offer ideas for more articles on women illustrators.
- And that's another morning when Real Life stuff hasn't been achieved. Such is the Wikipedia time-sink! PamD 11:52, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
September 2019 at Women in Red
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:23, 27 August 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Hey all!
Many of you probably know me from Women in Red, but I'm a photo restorer, who tries to do a minimum of 50% women-related images. Have been succeeding this year, at least. Always open to suggestions, can't really promise to fulfill them, as research doesn't always pan out in an image that's suitable for restoration, but I'll try! Currently working on Gina Krog. Adam Cuerden (talk)Has about 6.9% of all FPs 18:41, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
Pre-event Survey for WikiWomenCamp 2020
Please consider completing this Pre-event Survey for WikiWomenCamp 2020. Thank you! --Rosiestep (talk) 15:51, 17 September 2019 (UTC)
Tutor for it-N user
Hi. The Italian user Luigi asked me for help but I am super busy with Wiki Loves Monuments now. He need somebody to revise some articles here on enwiki Claudia Letizia, Milena Miconi, Sabrina Ferilli and Fanny Cadeo, I think he enlarged them all. Is anybody available? Thank you!--Alexmar983 (talk) 17:46, 21 September 2019 (UTC) Also, maybe some of the articles should be evaluated again.--Alexmar983 (talk) 17:49, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
October Events from Women in Red
|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:34, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red's stub contest is starting now
Our three-month stub contest is starting now and will continue until the end of the year. Although there will be no physical prizes, each month (October, November and December) recognition will be given to the winners of two different sections: one for new stubs, the other for enhancing existing stubs to start class and beyond. The contest is open to all registered members of Women in Red. Join in now and help us improve women's coverage on Wikipedia.--Ipigott (talk) 19:09, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
Human Rights- Commercial sexual exploitation of children
You are invited to join us for Wiki Loves Human Rights Child Trafficking. This year the Wikimedia Foundation has signed a Memerandum of Understanding to collaborate with the United Nations on advancing information on human rights within Wikimedia. Several projects will happen internationally starting from November 2019, which is around the anniversary of the universal declaration of human rights. I've initiated a project and collected topics on commercial sexual exploitation of children. It would be great if you'd support the project by translating articles, improving existing ones and writing new ones.
- You can sign up as a participant at: Wiki Loves Human Rights Child Trafficking - Participants.
--Sparrow (麻雀) 🐧 18:16, 19 October 2019 (UTC)
References
Sally Helgesen
Hi,
I have resubmitted a draft for a bestselling author Sally Helgesen after fixing the issues pointed out by the first reviewer. Can someone help me out with the review process as the previous reviewers have not responded in about a week?
Thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajobryan (talk • contribs) 20:02, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
Request for information on WP1.0 web tool
Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.
We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:25, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
November 2019 at Women in Red
|
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:57, 29 October 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Nomination of Jordan Evans (politician) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jordan Evans (politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jordan Evans (politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ☆ Bri (talk) 18:30, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
December events with WIR
|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:42, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Template needed
Hi. Does anybody here know what template is available to flag articles with gender bias? Specifically I looked up the Oregon Ducks because they have been in the news. But Wikipedia only covered men's basketball. It's kind of a pain to have to write the content one is trying to look up. Thank you. -SusanLesch (talk) 16:26, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
Merger discussion Water supply and women in developing countries
There is a merger discussion here - please add your opinion, and help if you can? Thanks. The question is: Perhaps it should be merged into an overarching article such as water issues in developing countries or WASH. EMsmile (talk) 02:30, 4 November 2019 (UTC)
Alice S. Fisher
There is an unsourcced paragraph of contentious material in the article about Alice S. Fisher, a partner at the law firm where I work. I have suggested an alternative paragraph, with a source, at: Talk:Alice_S._Fisher#Fixing_Unsourced_Paragraph Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. JZ at LW (talk) 18:54, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Hi, JZ at LW. You seem to have attracted a very experienced editor on the talk page. I would have to defer to their findings. Best wishes. -SusanLesch (talk) 18:21, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi Wikipedians, This actress has 22 film and TV credits. I have added IMDb as a ref/citation for "each" film and TV item, but someone (2601:246:C700:9B0:8DB1:30F:3466:53DA) is really trying to Afd article. Someone can step up and save this wiki article. |See rev diff SWP13 (talk) 15:16, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
Art+Feminism 2020 San Diego edit-a-thon
Hi everyone!
I am organizing two Art+Feminism edit-a-thons this year here in San Diego, one in the Spring and one in the Fall in the lead up to the 2020 election. What is the best way for me to connect with members who might be interested in 1) participating either in-person or online and/or 2) be willing to help as a trainer/instructor/helper during these events? Any guidance is appreciated!
Thank you! Praxis2020 (talk) 04:29, 18 January 2020 (UTC)
Request of Help
I was looking for some small help. I created an article Draft:Me Too movement (Pakistan) in user namespace. Article is almost ready but before taking to main namespace Looking for help in English language Spell-check, punctuation, grammar check and corrections. Using better alternative words etc. Thanks in advance.
Request of Help
I was looking for some small help. I created an article Valentine's Day in Pakistan. While article subject orientation is related to Romance relationships and festival, but in some parts of the world it touches serious issues like violations of women's rights & Human rights At this stage looking for help in better chronological order within article, and continued copy edit help in times to come.
Thanks in advance.
February with Women in Red
|
.jpg)
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:30, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Please comment on Talk:Male privilege
Your participation would be appreciated in this request for comment on Talk:Male privilege. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 05:50, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Wikimedia 2030 community discussions: Halfway to the conclusions
In case you are unaware, this information regarding Wikimedia 2030 community discussions may be of interest to you as it will affect editors everywhere. --Rosiestep (talk) 18:11, 5 February 2020 (UTC)
WikiProject Women in Green
Thanks to considerable support, WikiProject Women in Green which has been a task force of WikiProject Women is now a wikiproject in its own right. It will continue to work closely with WP Women and related projects. I would like to thank Dr. Blofeld for providing invaluable assistance over the past four or five years. Anyone interested in upgrading articles about women to GA status or higher is welcome to participate in the project.--Ipigott (talk) 11:32, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Excellent, thanks for this. Alanna the Brave, SusunW, yourself, Sportsfan77777 and a few others have been so important in this taking off. Hard to believe it was four and half years ago it was started! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:23, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Announced it at the new Wikipedia:Town Hall.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:37, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
I don't see why the above article should not be included in this project or in the Women in Music WP but another editor has removed those banners when they have been added.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 11:37, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
- I have re-added the banner {{WikiProject Women in music}}. Their reasons were spurious but reflect a common mis-conception that project banners = categorization. They do not. Voceditenore (talk) 12:56, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
- Johnsoniensis, I've also left a comment to that effect on Talk:Lily & Madeleine and a link to Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Guide#General principles to enlighten the editor in question. By the way, you've been doing sterling work on tagging and assessing the women in music articles. Bravo! Voceditenore (talk) 13:11, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for the clarification.--Johnsoniensis (talk) 15:17, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Women in the United States
At Talk:Women in the United States, I proposed a restructuring of the article. I just wanted to make sure this is acceptable.—Naddruf (talk ~ contribs) 15:17, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Focus
A suggestion for your project page, because I recently managed to add a GA nomination to the "January focus: Musician", until I figured out that January 2019 is not January 2020: Replace the old #GA focus of the month by a wikilink to the WP:WikiProject Women in Green/Goal Tracking/2020, and get rid of the apparently also obsolete WP:WikiProject Women in Green/GA Tasks Bulletin Board.
Wild guess, WIG is not something to put in a WPBS if your project is already there, same idea as for WIR, where my attempt to keep WIR in WPBS—after asking how that should be handled—failed (=WIR removed twice). –84.46.53.188 (talk) 02:51, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Script to detect unreliable sources
I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. The idea is that it takes something like
- John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (
John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)
and turns it into something like
- John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.
It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.
I'm still expanding coverage and tweaking logic, but what's there already works very well. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 01:38, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
The above linked article reads like a very unduly negative page. Its content does not clearly indicate why the person is notable. There is very little coverage of this woman's writing. Is anyone willing to help improve this article. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 21:01, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
- I found 5 sources (so far) on newspapers.com:
- https://www.newspapers.com/clip/44331507/shameful_chapter_in_jewish_history/
- https://www.newspapers.com/clip/44330758/a_nourishing_friendship/
- https://www.newspapers.com/clip/44329330/letters_to_the_editor/
- https://www.newspapers.com/clip/44291846/human_rights_charlatans_exposed_brazi/
- https://www.newspapers.com/clip/44292278/vincent_sticks_to_facts_explodes_lies/
- That's all I have time for this evening, but I'll look for more tomorrow.
- Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 01:39, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
- I've added/revised for WP:NPOV, but my eyes have scotomas, making proofreading difficult, so I'd apppreciate help with that. Cheers! Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 19:07, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- Grand'mere Eugene, thank you so much for taking this on. You did a great job! --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 02:10, 24 February 2020 (UTC)
- I've added/revised for WP:NPOV, but my eyes have scotomas, making proofreading difficult, so I'd apppreciate help with that. Cheers! Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 19:07, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Judge Judy GAR
Judy Sheindlin, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Nole (chat·edits) 21:35, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Female Art Dealers
Good afternoon from Berlin, there is a project that I would like to suggest and can work on myself. When I was observing galleries in Germany, Europe and the USA, I "naturally" noticed that women as art dealers only appeared very sporadically in the first half of the 20th century, and only slowly began to appear more frequently after 1945 from the 1980s. In the 1950s and 1960s there were some pioneers who had to fight very hard (in the US less than in Europe). I would add a contribution about gallery owners in the contribution Art Dealer and would be very grateful for content and language support / corrections. Many greetings
--PH_C 12:57, 6 March 2020 (UTC) PhilCult84 (talk)
Opinions are needed on the following: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine#Battered woman syndrome vs. battered person syndrome. A permalink for it is here. Please read the arguments before weighing in. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 23:58, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
April 2020 at Women in Red
|
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:58, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women footballer / soccer player articles nominated for deletion
An editor is nominating numerous articles about women footballers / soccer players who have played in top leagues in France and Sweden. The leagues most likely were included on WP:NFOOTY unbalanced list of notable leagues at the time of creation - and have since been removed but that's probably irrelevant here. Basically, many of the articles need improved referencing to meet WP:GNG.
Please see centralized discussion: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women in Red#Proposed deletion of women's footballer / soccer player articles.
Or if you're able to help update the articles to ensure WP:GNG met, even better. Searching French or Swedish Google makes a difference. Hmlarson (talk) 23:13, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
March 2020 : Tell Us About Here results
Hello!
During March, Wiki Loves Women ran the Tell Us About Her campaign on the ISA Tool. The drive was aimed at improving the visibility of political leaders and activists across Africa on Wikimedia projects. If you do not know it yet, the ISA tool is a fun and mobile-friendly tool that helps players to add better descriptions to photographs within selected categories that have been uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. The descriptions make the images more useful on Wikipedia and Wikidata. The information that is added to the image description is structured data (in the form of depicts or captions). Categories chosen for the Tell Us More About Her campaign were related to politicians, activists and, in particular, feminists based in Africa.
You can find out more about the campaign and the results here. There are many campaigns currently running on the ISA Tool, this was the first women-focused one. Please feel free to add your own! Isla Haddow (talk) 10:59, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Move discussion
There's an ongoing discussion regarding a potential move for Colleen Villard. The discussion can be found at Talk:Colleen Villard#Requested move 11 April 2020. Input from project members would be very much appreciated. Thanks, Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 23:46, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
The Princesse de Broglie painting and a biographical article on sitter
I wrote the article Draft:Pauline de Galard de Brassac de Béarn about the subject in The Princesse de Broglie painting by Ingress. Galard is referenced as wikidata:Q16206573 with no articles on any Wikipedia sites. There are only a few sources that address her personal accomplishments. Yet, she was a French noble, married to a famous person and the mother to several other people with WP articles. According to current guidelines, the subject does not meet WP:NBIO. One suggession from the WP community was to merge the biographical article into the existing article on the painting. This might be the best choice. I am concerned that this recommendation to add personal information about the subject in the painting would not be a good fit. The existing article has feature status (and thus throughly reviewed and vetted) talking extensively about Ingress process, not the sitter. I would like to hear from other editors on this topic. Should the draft be removed due to community standards and allow the article on the painting to be expanded with more biographical details on the sitter? Or should the policy on notability be handled differently in cases like this? Thanks for any input that will help me sort out an approach. - DutchTreat (talk) 11:44, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- Could her article be expanded with more information? The Drover's Wife (talk) 12:12, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
- @The Drover's Wife: Thanks for the encouragement. I will try to find more sources. - DutchTreat (talk) 09:20, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
- Lacking further sources about published works in her name. Most references refer to the painting. Does the community believe that being the subject of a famous painting is not sufficient WP:NBIO for a complete article? - DutchTreat (talk) 12:01, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
- @The Drover's Wife: Thanks for the encouragement. I will try to find more sources. - DutchTreat (talk) 09:20, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
| Hello, |
Australian women categories
There's an interesting discussion at Wikipedia:Australian_Wikipedians'_notice_board#Australian_women_categories which has led to Category:21st-century women writers no longer having an Australian presence as they have decided to do away with Category:21st-century Australian women writers. PamD 22:39, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
May 2020 at Women in Red
|
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 20:58, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A few days ago, I happened upon the phrase that “Feminism” is the radical notion that women are people
. By no means was this my first experience with this definition, but it did prod my curiosity. It took all but seconds to learn that this definition is attributed to Marie Shear. I was a little disappointed to see the article about her is rather on the short side. Perhaps outside the quote she wasn’t very notable? I suppose I shouldn’t complain, as I’m not (yet) notable for anything. This is one of those cases where “so fix it” applies, but on the chance that this is being seen by eyeballs that are attached to brains already capable and inclined to fix it, I would be grateful for any improvements they may make. If anyone pointS me to some sources, preferably of the RS variety I’d be willing to work with you on dabbling with this article and using the fixins bar. Thanks. --That man from Nantucket (talk) 13:32, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Taxation on Women's breasts
There is a discussion to delete the article about the Breast Tax on women. Please share your opinions here - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breast Tax. Your opinions are needed. 2402:3A80:190B:A5D4:2841:8265:4B49:AA48 (talk) 14:43, 12 May 2020 (UTC)
Requesting opinion on a page move request.
Hello,
@ Talk:Aurat (disambiguation)#Requested_move_11_May_2020 is taking place about article relating to women of mainly of Asian origin. In Past 2 days only two opinions are received and more opinions will be preferable. Thanks for your opinion and participation in discussion.
Articles relating to women
Hello Wikiproject Women editors. After I created the article Tracy R. Norris, I noticed that it has been included in the Wikiproject Women, and I am glad to see that my modest efforts have so contributed. I also created two other articles, which I believe may be of interest to this project: Fully feathered basket and Mary Knight Benson. I do hope Wikiproject Women editors peruse these articles for the project's consideration. Most kind regards, Hu Nhu (talk) 16:08, 13 May 2020 (UTC)
WP:Articles for Creation now has a sort tool; you can use it to review Draft articles which are specifically biographies of Women: Wikipedia:AfC sorting/Culture/Biography/Women
Just thought some folks here would like to be able to see proposed drafts and weigh in: Wikipedia:AfC sorting/Culture/Biography/Women. MatthewVanitas (talk) 03:06, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
June 2020 at Women in Red
| June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 17:10, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
| Hello, |
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aurat (word)
The terms "Aurat", "Arvad", "Avret", and "Awrath" may refer to: Women of Asian religious or cultural descent and identity.
Self nomination for AFD since article copy pasted to Draft:Aurat for incubation because IMHO current article title Aurat (word) is misleading and confusing leading to western systemic bias and stifling the article growth. Please find Detail reason at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aurat (word)
I invite project members to review current and potential sourcing and weigh in on the AfD discussion. Thanks! Bookku (talk) 02:47, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
Featured article length & Laura Harrier
FAC Laura Harrier is currently in a standstill. One editor supported the promotion to FA status but the current editor believes the article is too short to be a Featured Article. Could anyone assist with this article or quickly look over it for a review, or if not interested in reviewing it, let me know if it is indeed too short please? Factfanatic1 (talk) 13:36, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
Request for comment about Greta Thunberg
If you are interested there is a request for comment about Talk:Greta Thunberg#Picture change. AnomalousAtom (talk) 10:47, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
July 2020 at Women in Red
|
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:10, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Johanson Analysis
I am not sure the best place to post the following request for input. If this isn't it, please direct me toward a better site. I've posted in the Teahouse, also, but so far no response.
I wrote an article on the Johanson analysis for the representation of women and girls in movies. Another editor set up a draft page for me where we are fine-tuning the article. If anyone here would like to take a look at the page and offer comments, it would be appreciated. You can find it here: Draft: Johanson analysis
While writing this article, I looked up the author of the analysis (MaryAnn Johanson) and found that a page existed for her some years ago that was deleted. The discussion I found for the deletion is somewhat brief and includes a rationale by one editor against the deletion. However, the deletion went through anyway, it looks like because the other editor didn't feel the references given for Johanson established notability. I suspect the original page wasn't written according to established Wikipedia practices, and that's what got it into trouble. I haven't seen the original article, but I don't see any problem establishing notability for Johanson, certainly not in 2020. She is a prominent film critic and feminist known in the US and abroad. I'd like to investigate the possibility of reinstating her page to provide a link to the page about the Johanson analysis. The analysis provides a more thorough manner of rating the representation of women in the media than the Bechdel test (and other related analyses), and the Bechdel test includes pages for both the test and its author. Such articles address the intent both of developing better representation of women in Wikipedia and through the Wikipedia, in general, as set forth in Wikiproject Women. I'd much appreciate any suggestions, comments, or help that anyone here on this. JacDT (talk) 14:03, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
- JacDT Your draft seems well in hand. Grand'mere Eugene is a fine mentor. I wouldn't worry overmuch about a previous article that has been deleted. If you are able to find adequate WP:RS, which are not promotional and can establish her WP:Notability, go for it. Whatever the problems of the previous version were, as long as your article is neutral, cited, not a WP:Copyvio and complies with WP:BLP, you should be fine. If you are interested, there are essays on writing about women available at Women in Red (WIR). At the top of the talk page, just click on the box with the logo at the very top (it's grey) where it says show. WIR is an extremely active and very helpful project, so if you need more help or input feel free to join us there. SusunW (talk) 16:53, 16 July 2020 (UTC)
August 2020 at Women in Red
|
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:49, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Rfc: Why participation of Muslim background women on Wikipedia as editors is too less?
Hi.
If you feel interested in, then kindly do share your inputs on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Islam#Why does editorial participation of Muslim women on Wikipedia is too less?
Thanks and regards
Deletion discussion about Avandi
Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avandi --Brookford (talk) 18:31, 4 August 2020 (UTC)
New article moved back to draftspace
Hello! I'm a very, very new editor, and I'm wondering if there are any resources you recommend for ensuring my draft about health economist & CEO Kyna Fong (Draft:Kyna Fong) meets the requirements to be approved for the main space. As of now, it needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. I would greatly appreciate any feedback, help, or suggestions you have! Thanks so much. --Ambercooley (talk) 18:52, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- It looks like you have made a good start, and just need more sources to write from on her early life and education. I left 5 potential sources on the draft. Let me know if you need more sources or any other help with this article. — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 00:12, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
RfC on defining violence in the lead of the Violence article
Opinions are needed on the following matter: Talk:Violence#RfC about the first and second sentences in the lead. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 04:01, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
September Women in Red edithons
|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Peer review request
Requesting peer review at Wikipedia:Peer review/Women in Islam/archive1,
Meredith Kopit Levien
ResolvedHello! On behalf of The New York Times Company (and as disclosed on the article's talk page), I've suggested some updates (actually, corrections) to the Meredith Kopit Levien article at Talk:Meredith Kopit Levien. One editor implemented the first request, but I've struggled to get someone to review Additional_requests to fix inaccurate text. I've drafted specific changes here, which I hope makes reviewing and implementing easy. Would a member of WikiProject Women be willing to review and update the article on my behalf? Thanks for your consideration. Inkian Jason (talk) 18:16, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
- The request has been answered, so I am marking this section as resolved. Thanks! Inkian Jason (talk) 15:35, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Alexis Texas for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alexis Texas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexis Texas (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Right cite (talk) 05:28, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
October editathons from Women in Red
|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Discussion of draft Wikimedia Universal Code of Conduct closing in nine days
A Wikimedia committee has posted a draft version of a Universal Code of Conduct at meta which, while it contains language about respecting the diversity of community members and condemning hate speech that appears in vandalism, does not appear to prohibit or otherwise mention racism, sexism, homophobia, or other forms of prejudice outside of vandalism and direct insults (in the English version, at least.) It does concern itself with, for example, defining repeated sarcasm as a form of harassment. In the page containing summaries of committee meetings the words "racism", "sexism", and "homophobia" also do not appear. (In the English version.)
Perhaps there is a good or practical reason for this; I'm not personally familiar with the high-level Wikimedia policy development process. But the discussion of the UCoC draft closes on October 7, after which the drafting committee will submit its recommendation to the Wikimedia Board of Trustees, so I am placing this message in this talk page in the hopes of ensuring that editors who can comment constructively on the absence of language providing guidance on non-insult, non-vandalism expressions of prejudice get a chance to comment. --▸₷truthious Ⓑandersnatch◂ 19:39, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
New improved article Aroused (film)
I researched and improved the page Aroused (film) - let me know if you want to help out with further research, thank you! Right cite (talk) 03:40, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
November edit-a-thons from Women in Red
|
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Discussion about including content on negative social-media comments on an actress, if you have an opinion. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 18:56, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
FAR notice
I have nominated Kellie Loder for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm Bacon 20:02, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
Requested move Lady A → Lady A (band)
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Lady A § Requested move 9 November 2020. This is a discussion about moving Lady A → Lady A (band) as per the WP:BANDDAB naming convention guideline & to disambiguate the band from Anita White AKA Lady A (singer). Peaceray (talk) 04:28, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Wiki/Women/Womxn Meet Up for Movement Strategy Implementation
Preceding the global movement strategy implementation events scheduled for November 21&22 and December 5&6, regional, thematic, and language-based wiki communities are holding their own events. Wiki/women/womxn of all language communities will be coming together for a Zoom meeting this weekend. Hope many of you can participate.
- Wiki/Women/Womxn Meet Up for Movement Strategy Implementation
- Saturday, November 14, 2020, at 16:00 - 18:00 UTC
- Special guest: Katherine Maher, WMF CEO and Executive Director
English-language Wikipedia's Meet Up for Movement Strategy Implementation
The English-language Wikipedia's Meet Up for Movement Strategy Implementation will occur on Tuesday, 17th November 2020, from 5 to 7pm UTC via Zoom. Details here: m:Wikimedia UK/Events/Discussion about priorities for the English Wikipedia. --Rosiestep (talk) 14:38, 13 November 2020 (UTC)