Jrank Edit

Per past RSN discussions, this source should be highlighted as generally unreliable. Thanks. 137a (talkedits) 18:02, 31 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  Done Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 13:36, 17 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Motley fool Edit

Hi, is there a discussion you can point me towards for the listing of the Motley fool as generally unreliable? :3 F4U (they/it) 23:24, 13 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It was discussed at RSN here and here (just search for Motley Fool). It's also listed here and in here. It doesn't seem to be the worst source in the world, but it seems very speculative and opinion driven. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 23:30, 13 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Fantastic tool Edit

Just a thank you for creating such a useful tool. Amigao (talk) 20:40, 17 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Any chance of also picking up other language lists? Edit

For example I write quite a lot about Turkey and sometimes cite Turkish sources here on English Wikipedia. Any chance of your very useful script also scanning the other language lists such as https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vikipedi:G%C3%BCvenilir_kaynaklar/M%C3%BCtemadi_kaynaklar

I am incited to request this after Yeni Şafak was described as "obviously reliable" in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nail_Olpak Chidgk1 (talk) 13:13, 27 September 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]