You've got mail!Edit

 
Hello, Wikipedical. Please check your email; you've got mail! The subject is wikipedia email - Newspapers.com.
Message added 23:00, 23 May 2017 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

--Cameron11598 (Talk) 23:00, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Monument Valley 2Edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Monument Valley 2, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kleuske (talk) 18:33, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Battlefront II page moveEdit

Please make sure to cleanup up the links to the old page. @Amakuru: As info. -- ferret (talk) 18:19, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Hopefully the WP:DISAMBIGPROJECT will come along and sort these out soon!  — Amakuru (talk) 21:41, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Move discussionEdit

ArbCom 2017 election voter messageEdit

 Hello, Wikipedical. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 24Edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Airtel digital TV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Multiplex, Topper, ETC, Prime News, Masti, ETV 2, Paras and Peace of Mind

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curatedEdit

Hi, I'm PRehse. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, The Opposition with Jordan Klepper, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

PRehse (talk) 11:05, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of The One Percent (TV series) for deletionEdit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The One Percent (TV series) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The One Percent (TV series) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Radiphus 22:15, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians who like Black MirrorEdit

Hey! I saw that you edited the article Black Mirror and thought maybe you would be interested in this new user category I created?-🐦Do☭torWho42 () 01:30, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Greg PenceEdit

One piece in the NYT and one in Roll Call is hardly "significant coverage". Especially since it is not over time, but only in the context of a political campaign that he has not won (because it hasn't happened yet). I created that as a redirect because that's the appropriate way to handle this. I do not want to take this to AfD but I will if you don't self-revert it back into a redirect. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:45, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

"Significant coverage" refers to the depth of coverage, not the number of articles. Those two long profiles certainly establish notability. Even having said that, a quick peek at Google News shows that there's a good deal of coverage about Greg Pence – and not just mere mentions. Moreover, per WP:NTEMP: "once a topic has been the subject of significant coverage in accordance with the general notability guideline, it does not need to have ongoing coverage." So it does not matter that he hasn't received coverage "over time." I believe that the article currently satisfies notability guidelines and should be improved rather than deleted. If you still have concerns, you should bring the article to AfD. -- Wikipedical (talk) 16:03, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Paramount Pictures logo (2013).jpgEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Paramount Pictures logo (2013).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:05, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Page mover grantedEdit

Hello, Wikipedical. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, and move subpages when moving the parent page(s).

Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.

Useful links:

If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Primefac (talk) 01:40, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 9Edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Escape at Dannemora, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brett Johnson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 9 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter messageEdit

 Hello, Wikipedical. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Corporate (TV series)Edit

I've restored yet again the perfectly valid prodcodes per the cc.com site. If you want to remove prodcodes go take a look and the completely unreferenced and incorrect ones at List of Teachers (2016 TV series) episodes. Also that article is completely not keeping with the standard practice of leaving ratings below millions unrounded. 119.224.3.221 (talk) 22:58, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

List of Super BowlsEdit

Hi there. I saw you moved List of Super Bowl champions back in 2012 (and immediately reverted yourself). Your edit summary: "Not just winners, a list of games" makes a lot of sense. I've been thinking about it and the page probably should be moved to List of Super Bowls as the list is very much about more than just the champions; it includes information about Super Bowl participants, stadiums, cities, attendance, etc.. Before I open a move request on the talk page I figured I would ask you if you had any specific rationale for moving it back that I should take into consideration?

Thanks, - PaulT+/C 19:19, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

Re: List of Super BowlsEdit

Originally posted to my talk page. Moved here to keep the discussion all in one place. I hope you don't mind.

Hey there. I believed (and believe) the name should be moved – because the lists describe much more than just the winners/'champions' – but as I recall I noticed there are many, many other similar pages like List of NBA champions, List of Stanley Cup champions, List of Wimbledon gentlemen's singles champions, etc. So a much larger naming conventions discussion should be initiated instead of a single page move. -- Wikipedical (talk) 16:20, 22 May 2019 (UTC)

I'm not sure that a huge discussion beyond something at the talk page of the article is necessary. Just because those other pages exist doesn't mean that they necessarily dictate anything an the Super Bowl page. Unless, is there specific MOS guidance on the topic? I'm not aware of anything that might be relevant. - PaulT+/C 03:59, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
I don't know of any MOS discussion, but noticing that consistency exists with other articles was my rationale for moving it back. -- Wikipedical (talk) 17:43, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Untitled Deadwood film listed at Redirects for discussionEdit

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Untitled Deadwood film. Since you had some involvement with the Untitled Deadwood film redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 17:08, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

External linksEdit

Ah! Then how to link TikTok profiles to list? List of most-followed Instagram accounts have same format. -- CptViraj (📧) 14:06, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

"Joker (upcoming film)" listed at Redirects for discussionEdit

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Joker (upcoming film). Since you had some involvement with the Joker (upcoming film) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 17:47, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

The WDSMP noteEdit

For the WDSMP note, it will only be included on the bottom of the page, it will not disrupt from the labeled distributor of the film by 20CF or whoever else, please try to come to some compromise that will allow the mention WDSMP note on the page. The case for 20CF is different from that of Universal or WB, as their owners don’t operate film divisions, for Disney, they have a distribution system that can easily be listed as a small note in the notes section and still allow 20CF to be listed in the primary section. 184.54.163.113 (talk) 03:32, 23 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter messageEdit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Ressurection Of The ChristEdit

I agree with your OP statement about my comment about it possibly being filmed already. But I would just tell you the film is listed on the Industry standard website IMDB PRO(a valid professional source) as specifically in Pre-production(preparing for filming) with an official Teaser Poster(uploaded just 3 days ago) and logo supplied by the production company. Meaning that it is not in "development hell"(as that is listed on site as "in development") but has in fact been greenlit and is an active film production looking to begin filming with a projected April(/Easter) 2021 release date and an estimated(from the Script) runtime of 167mins.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt5795232/

So it is indeed an active film project, and not stuck in development. It's mainly slightly too early(like 6 months really) for a film page just yet. I hope you don't take it the wrong way, just telling you the film is indeed a real legit production with an official projected release date.Colliric (talk) 07:32, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

  • User:Colliric, Imdb is generally not considered a reliable source but is used as an external link. Moreover, a film's listing supplied by its own production company is not independent of the subject. Notability is recognized by significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Plus, as WP:NFF notes, "Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles." -- Wikipedical (talk) 19:18, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Revisit on RfCEdit

Found this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Film/Archive_74#Revisit_on_RfC

--172.58.99.162 (talk) 18:55, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

2020 in television moved to draftspaceEdit

An article you recently created, 2020 in television, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 14:19, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi Wikipedical, In mainspace now. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 22:44, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Deuce.pngEdit

 

The file File:Deuce.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 7 February 2020 (UTC)