Archive

Archives


1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Your thread has been archivedEdit

 

Hi DoctorWho42! You created a thread called time-limit on welcoming committee? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 30 January 2020 (UTC)


One questionEdit

I added small cell lung cancer into category of rare diseases, as per National Organization for Rare Disorders. I am surprised nobody added this earlier, but it's never too late. Why is it now showing up on this page? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Rare_diseases — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.199.110.74 (talk) 19:00, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

It was redirected to lung cancer by Rewster (talk · contribs) in 2006 and then to small cell carcinoma by TadejM (talk · contribs) in 2010.--🐦DrWho42 (🔨) 19:12, 31 January 2020 (UTC)

Your signatureEdit

Hello. I noticed that your signature is hard to read. According to this contrast calculator, your contrast ratio is 3.567, well below the minimum 4.5 suggested in the WP:SIGAPP policy. This is an accessibility issue. Would you consider fixing this? My suggestion: ―🐦DoctorWho42 🔨Mandruss  18:31, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

changed the colours to contrast better!--🐦DrWho42 (👻) 03:16, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
A large improvement. Thank you very much. ―Mandruss  03:27, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Doctor Who Survival.jpgEdit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Doctor Who Survival.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:31, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Doctor Who The Krotons.jpgEdit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Doctor Who The Krotons.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:41, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Doctor Who Ghost Light.jpgEdit

 

Thank you for uploading File:Doctor Who Ghost Light.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:45, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Category:Human Food WikiLove templates has been nominated for mergingEdit

 

Category:Human Food WikiLove templates has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:48, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fundrazr screenshot 2017.pngEdit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Fundrazr screenshot 2017.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Bernie Sanders' Dank Meme Stash for deletionEdit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bernie Sanders' Dank Meme Stash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernie Sanders' Dank Meme Stash (4th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ThirdDolphin (talk) 02:58, 23 May 2020 (UTC)