User talk:Wikipedical/Archive 3

Barry Marder page

Why are you editing Barry Marder and Ted L Nancy pages? Do we need our attorney to explain what the Barry Marder and Ted L Nancy wikipedia should contain? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mtamony (talk • contribs) 16:22, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

• Hello. Your attorney does not decide what should be on Wikipedia, consensus does. I've changed it into a disambiguation page for the two authors now. -- Wikipedical (talk) 17:53, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
• Why are you editing these pages? Bruce Baum did not author some of the books you have listed. You are incorrectly editing pages. Mtamony —Preceding undated comment added 18:51, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
• Why do you continue to edit these pages? You have edited Barry Marder page as well as Ted L Nancy page? We can update the content and create better citations, but why just redirect it? Mtamony

Non-free rationale for File:ScroogeFirst.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:ScroogeFirst.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:25, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Arrested Development cast members, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dave Thomas and Ian Roberts (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Your free 1-year Questia online library account is approved ready

Good news! You are approved for access to 77,000 full-text books and 4 million journal, magazine, newspaper articles, and encyclopedia entries. Check your Wikipedia email!

1. Go to https://www.questia.com/specialoffer
2. Input your unique Offer ID and Promotional code. Click Continue. (Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive).
3. Create your account by entering the requested information. (This is private and no one from Wikipedia will see it).
4. You'll then see the welcome page with your Login ID. (The account is now active for 1 year).

If you need help, please first ask Ocaasi at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com and, second, email QuestiaHelp@cengage.com along with your Offer ID and Promotional Code (subject: Wikipedia).

• A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a Questia article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free Questia pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:Questia/Citations.
• Questia would love to hear feedback at WP:Questia/Experiences
• Show off your Questia access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/Questia_userbox}} on your userpage
• When the 1-year period is up, check the applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi EdwardsBot (talk) 05:16, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

The Weekenders (TV pilot)

I don't think a close and move on the same day that an article is nominated through WP:RM is a good closure. Since the RM process is supposed to run for atleast 7 days, could you revert what you did, and reopen the discussion (to run for 7 days from the date of reopening) ? Or could you provide a policy-based rationale for the early close and move? Since you didn't leave a rationale for your early close, or a rationale for the move, it's a headscratcher as to what parameters you used to determine that it should be moved, and to the name it was moved to. -- 76.65.131.248 (talk) 22:42, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Double Redirect

In the future, it would be best to fix a double redirect, before nominating it at RFD. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 09:39, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Todd Zuniga

Hello. Just to let you know that I declined your PROD on Todd Zuniga. I was a bit undecided so have erred on the side of keeping it - partly because there are sources from legitimate news publications given as references. It would be worth taking to WP:AfD though for a proper consensus. Cheers, Whouk (talk) 12:14, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Recent prods

I have removed several prod tags that you recently placed on articles. Would you care to explain how the prod rationale on Frankie Paul article, which already cites Allmusic and two encyclopedias, stating "Fails to meet WP:N; no reliable sources." is in any way appropriate? I am struggling to see this as constructive editing. --Michig (talk) 06:41, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Please note as well that, although it is not required, the article's creator or other significant contributors should ideally be left a message at their talk page(s) informing them of the proposed article deletion, except for cases where contributors are no longer regarded as active editors on Wikipedia. This should be done by adding the {{subst:Proposed deletion notify|Name of Article‎}} tag, or other appropriate text. I do not see any evidence of notifications in your contribution history. If I missed them, please let me know here. Thanks, Tgeairn (talk) 05:33, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of Louie episodes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Variety

Louie (TV series) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Variety

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:07, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Your recent PRODs

You are prodding too many articles in too short a space of time. Not only are you creating a lot of work for other editors you are clearly not spending enough time looking at these articles and considering alternatives to deletion before tagging them. Some of the articles you tagged are clearly not suitable for proposed deletion, which is only for uncontroversial deletion candidates. --Michig (talk) 05:57, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Having reviewed some of the Prods, I agree with Michig's comment, and feel the need to emphasize that Prods have only ever meant to be used for uncontroversial deletions. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 03:23, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Sky AfD

Hey Wikipedical. I would love to but (and this is embarrassing after being here for so long) I don't know how to :$. If you could help me out, I'll message all the editors who have voted so far to draw their attention to the enlarged AfD. doktorb _words^deeds 03:19, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Sky AfD

For your information, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of channels on Sky has been modified to include an expanded list of directly related articles. I'm just letting you know that this has happened so you may add or amend your comments in response. Many thanks, doktorb _words^deeds 03:40, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

Big thanks

Just wanted to stop by and say a big thank you for your cleaning up of the references on the Lost article. I've been meaning to get to it for quite awhile now, and I started yesterday, and it was nice to see that you got more of it completed. There's still a bit more, mainly just formatting the refs that currently don't use cite templates. So yeah, thanks again! See ya around. Drovethrughosts (talk) 12:43, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

UK channel line up Afd

Just to let you know, I've created Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of digital terrestrial television channels (UK) as a further extension of the current debate on channel listings on Wikipedia. Your input would be appreciated doktorb _words^deeds 17:42, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your clear outline of the edit warring at Indovision - appreciate the effort you put into that - cheers

we have issues in the South East Asian projects (Malaysia and Indonesia are the ones I have watched at times - where the channel and services articles become vast unalpha, un anything globs of old programmes, and uncited info that seems to stretch for as far as the eye can see - so to speak... ) where such articles attract repeated re-insertions of material clearly not encyclopediac SatuSuro 15:21, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Sky Italia channel line up Afd

Hi Wikipedical, I appreciate you reaching out to me. I am a brand new "editor" at Wikipedia and I am still unsure how to use this interface, it is a bit bewildering, however I have join in on commenting because they did delete Sky Italia channel page which I still need for work. I am very upset about that. How can we make sure that useful items are recognized as useful even if they piss people off? I am going to try and comment to keep most of the pages but this really is frustrating.Lanaii7 (talk) 16:26, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Star Wars Live-Action TV Series (Proposed Deletion)

Considering the fact that a consensus is already emerging against a proposed merger of the Star Wars Live-Action TV Series, I'm not sure what your reasoning is to propose deletion.

I haven't been able to locate the discussion on this matter (refered to in the template). I'd appreciate a link.--rrzzrr (talk) 21:36, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Nevermind, found the discussion. --rrzzrr (talk) 21:40, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion on To Catch A Goddess

Hello Wikipedical! I noticed you recently tagged To Catch A Goddess with A7 where th article is about a film. A7 only applies on (1) Individuals, (2) Animals, (3) Organisations, (4) Web content. So that, I declined your speedy. Please be more careful next time. Thank you and have a nice day! Mediran ^{talk to me!} 05:31, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

PS If you think the article really needs to be deleted, please nominate it on AFD. Mediran ^{talk to me!} 05:33, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Your request for rollback

Hi Wikipedical/Archive 3. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! v/r - TP 15:48, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of "Breaking changes" for speedy deletion

You recently nominated the "breaking changes" redirect page for speedy deletion - however, redirect pages are not eligible for speedy deletion (according to the speedy deletion template on the same page). Jarble (talk) 02:55, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Polo200/Sandbox

Thanks for specifying which article you meant; a db-repost is useless for a mass AFD without a link and without anything clear in the text of the page. The difference between the two is that User:2679D/List of StarHub TV and mio TV channels was created after the deletion discussion, while Polo's sandbox wasn't. The deletion of a page with certain content definitely doesn't mean that we automatically delete the same content in other previously-existing pages that weren't part of the discussion; sometimes the deletion reason is applicable in both situations (e.g. copyvios), but it's not here. Imagine if User:Nyttend/Ohio NRHP/Pickaway were in mainspace: it's definitely not encyclopedic, and it would deserve to be deleted, but it's fine in userspace because it helps me to coordinate tasks unobtrusively, and it therefore wouldn't be deleted just because the mainspace page was. Nyttend (talk) 02:49, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Nor is this sandbox. As I keep telling you, the sandbox existed three years before the mainspace page was deleted, and as such it is not a repost. You're free to nominate it for miscellany for deletion (and I'd lean toward a "delete" vote), but WP:FAKEARTICLE is not a reason for speedy deletion. Nyttend (talk) 02:56, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Dish México

Hi, sorry excuse but mind if I ask, what is your source that Dish México isn't called Dish México. The website clearly says Dish México. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 12:52, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

My subpage

Thanks for letting me know about that. It was a page I haven't really done much with. I requested a speedy delete, so the subpage should be deleted shortly. --hmich176 09:16, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

List of Qwest Choice TV channels

Hello, just letting you know I removed the prod from the above article as was previously proposed for deletion. Thank you. Rotten regard Softnow 19:31, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Unjini

Hello again, just letting you know that I removed the prod from the above article as locations if verifiable are usually considered notable.

Thank you. Rotten regard Softnow 20:52, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Please remember to follow the directions when PRODding articles

The PROD template clearly states you should be notifying the author(s) and WikiProjects when you PROD and article for deletion. You did not do this with the Cable TV Wakasa Obama. Please remember to do so for any articles you PROD in the future. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 09:03, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

SNL

The template is totally confusing for many wikipedians and other viewers. Please let us change to the way it was. --AmazingRaceClub talk • edits —Preceding undated comment added 23:06, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Re: SNL

However, the things you named are TV shows. There is a difference as in the TV shows this template is used to describe what happened in an episode. In this case, it does not work with SNL as SNL has notes, not episode desription. It was better the other way as right next to the episode the notes were given as what the special guests were, etc. Putting it one next to each other makes it more confusing then putting it one under another in this white table instead of this. Either way SNL 38 and 37 are the only ones that have the new layout so. It is better to keep it the way it has been for years. --AmazingRaceClub talk • edits —Preceding undated comment added 23:06, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Saturday Night Live (season 32), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Downey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Wikipedical. You have new messages at Koavf's talk page.
Message added 19:10, 6 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:10, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Anthony Crispino

Hello, just letting you know I removed the prod from the above article as it has previously been proposed for deletion. Thank you. Rotten regard 18:43, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Gun laws in the United States by state

Interesting rename. I'm not sure, but think it makes sense. But this is surely not correct. There are two completely different articles -- the one you just renamed to Gun laws in the United States by state, about the state laws, and Gun law in the United States, about the federal laws. The old name Gun laws in the United States (by state) should definitely redirect to Gun laws in the United States by state. (If you reply here I will see what you say.) — Mudwater ^(Talk) 05:59, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

• Yep, thanks for the note, I've corrected my initial redirect mistake. -- Wikipedical (talk) 06:02, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. — Mudwater ^(Talk) 06:04, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shammi Narang, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newsreader (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Yasuhiro Matsuda

Hello Wikipedical. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Yasuhiro Matsuda, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Being a professor indicates importance/significance, use WP:PROD or WP:AFD instead. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 00:46, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ben Hoffman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New Girl (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Does WP:V apply to plot summaries?

Hi Wikipedical. I appreciate more eyes on the Talk:The_Sword_of_Shannara#Sources_for_claims_in_the_plot_summaries question. But I'm a bit uncertain on which way your comment is intended to go, relative to the two opinions that were stated immediately preceding your comment.

I'm feeling a bit disoriented by the discussion there, as this is the first time I've every heard an editor take a position that original research plot summaries of fiction are okay on the Wikipedia, and that the core policy WP:V does not apply to those parts of the encyclopedia.

Moreoverr, since that editor seems not to want to follow WP:BRD procedure, and discuss for a while to see if a consensus can be reached, and just wants to revert, I don't think it is a productive idea for me to revert him again to try to keep the focus on the Discussion/Consensus-building.

At any rate, a clarification of your comment would be much appreciated. And if your view is that the recent revert of the article does not represent policy, then perhaps you could consider reverting and bringing it back to the Talk page for more consensus building. Cheers. N2e (talk) 05:32, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for puttung your thoughts into the discussion. Since it has no source whatsovever, as you point out, the primary source ought to be cited with page number(s) etc, which you also indicated you agreed with.

That, to me, would indicate that the {citation needed} tags should have stayed, and not be removed by The Ed17, during the course of the discussion. That is my only argument. Then the WP:BRD process on the Talk page could run its course in the normal way. If the consensus is your view, and my view, that even primary sources should be cited, then that consensus would indicate that the tags on the plot summary stay. I don't want to be the only editor reverting The Ed17 there, so if you really think that, I offer again the opportunity for you to revert it so the discussion can continue in good faith.

I don't agree that citationneeded tags are necessary nor appropriate. As I said at the discussion, while it is preferable to have inline citations, the absence of them in a plot summary section implies the section content's source is the primary source itself, like To Kill a Mockingbird#Plot summary, as I mentioned. -- Wikipedical (talk) 13:21, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Fair enough. Thanks for sharing your thought and rationale. And thanks for entering into that discussion in good faith. Cheers. N2e (talk) 13:47, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Adult Swim programs

Alright, I am prepared to make a compramise or a an agreement with you. I would like for you to stop doing large scale edits to the page, which could end in us both being blocked from editing, which nobody wants, and I believe these are reasonable suggestions.

• You can organize the page you have been organizing it. It is much more informative this way.
• The colored boxes should not be colored. It does not make much sense.
• The boxes that were colored should be kept, though should not be colored like they previously were. This allows for more information storage.
• Do not remove ratings, ratings are information just like everything else here. If you say there is no reason to keep it, that brings the question into mind: What reason is there to delete it? Plus, it is not our job to say it is not useful. Someone out there will probably find some use for it.
• Keep unaired programming noted, as they were scheduled to air but did not. I would suggest moving it into it's own section.
• Keep all information from the previous article. If it does not have a scource, I will try my hardest to find it, as I am certain they are not lies.
• Keep the expired/finished section. Expired programming should belong in the past programming section, as it is accquired programming they do not have the rights to any longer. Finished programming, on the other hand, they still have the rights to broadcast.

Then again, I do not have the authority to make such edits without any sort of permission, and neither do you (not trying to be disrespectful). Many users agree with this statement, but that does not necessarily mean they disagree with your decisions, and another has agreed with me that you should check the talk page first for discussion. For now, I would recommend you not change anything until you start a discussion at the talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.121.222.242 (talk) 20:44, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Anthony Cooper

Sorry, I just felt that he is a big enough character to have his own page. - Anotymous 24.67.49.175 (talk) 07:20, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Fairview Alpha Wildcats

Hi. I don't understand why you changed the CSD template on the above article. The school doesn't exist. Why is "not notable" more relevant than "hoax"? Gtwfan52 (talk) 12:37, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Wikipedical. You have new messages at Gtwfan52's talk page.
Message added 12:46, 27 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Gtwfan52 (talk) 12:46, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Zev Wolfson

Hello Wikipedical. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Zev Wolfson, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims coverage in reliable sources. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 12:41, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Hello Wikipedical and thank you Malik Shabazz for your last comment and support and understanding. To whom it may concern, if this case is still an issue, I would greatly encourage you to see this Talk:Zev Wolfson. thanks, Yambaram (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:05, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Rash page moves

Please think twice before moving pages. There are at least five (5) other articles called Concerto for Two Pianos and Orchestra (name), apart from the Bruch. -- Jack of Oz ^[Talk] 10:24, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Mad Anthony Band

Hello Wikipedical. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Mad Anthony Band, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The award won is probably enough for A7. Lack of sources do indicate it may fail the GNG though, so take to AfD if required. Thank you. GedUK  11:26, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Stephen Baldwin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baldwin brothers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Fridays episodes, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages KISS and David Naughton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

The Suggestibles

Hi, I have removed the PROD tag as it is not eligible (previously deleted by this method) - please take to WP:AFD. Regards, GiantSnowman 16:07, 18 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dream Satellite TV, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Planet Rock (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Wikipedical. You have new messages at Ronhjones's talk page.
Message added 22:02, 28 February 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

 Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 22:02, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Masterclass (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bruce Weber (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Nikki Bell (actress) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nikki Bell (actress) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikki Bell (actress) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:50, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Maron (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adam Scott (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:26, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Declined prod

I wanted to let you know that I declined your prod on Projectproject; while there aren't many sources there, there are a few, which are enough to make me believe the subject might be notable. You're welcome to take it to WP:AFD if you like, if you can't find further sourcing after searching for it. Qwyrxian (talk) 10:29, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Horace Mann

Seeing no response here after several days, I restored my edit today. If you respond now there, I'd appreciate your letting me know. Cheers. Swliv (talk) 21:12, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Rocko's Modern Life episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joe Murray (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 21:38, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Variety logo 2013.gif)

Thanks for uploading File:Variety logo 2013.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 05:09, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Lost

Hi Wikipedical,

I apologize for the Lost (TV series) move; I saw that there was no previous move to the title and therefore thought that I would be bold, but I should have seen the discussion on the talk page. I have moved the talk page back to where it was. Do you know if a move to the main Lost title has been discussed? I do not find this middle-of-the-road, partial-disambiguation title to be adequate.

Neelix (talk) 20:40, 30 April 2013 (UTC)