User talk:Sarah/Archive21

Latest comment: 6 years ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic The Signpost: 23 June 2017

Australasian Intervarsity Debating Championships

Hi,

I know it's yet another 'debate' related page but can you have a look a Australasian Intervarsity Debating Championships - I had removed large elements of this page as being either unreferenced or WP:OR, however an IP user has put them back - I am unable to find any WP:RS for the "results" are you or should they just be "removed".

Thanks Codf1977 (talk) 08:51, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi Codf, my apologies but I don't have time to look at this now. Just use your best judgment. :) I haven't looked at the article but from what you've said here, if there's no reliable source for results, I'd just remove them and leave the IP a message explaining that they need to produce a reliable source per WP:V if they want the material to be kept here. For other information, if it seems non-controversial but just isn't sourced, you could put a couple of fact tags on it and wait a few weeks to see if the IP produces any sources and then remove it if they don't. If the information seems controversial and is unsourced, I'd just remove it. I'll have a look-see at the page when I have some time but it probably won't be for a few days. Cheers, Sarah 06:44, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
I have removed it all - most of it has been tagged since February, your eye over the article, when you have some time would be appreciated. Codf1977 (talk) 09:18, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Problematic IP

Hi Sarah, I was wondering if you could deal with User:122.107.175.135 reported by User: Radiopathy (Result: )? IP doesn't seem to listen at all. Bidgee (talk) 06:40, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Oh, you were so lucky, Mr Bidgee. I was about to leave when you posted that request. I've blocked the guy. Am heading out now but will catch up with you later. I hope you're over the flu now. Cheers, Sarah 06:56, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
Cheers for that Sarah, guess I was lucky to ask when I did! Yep over it at last! Bidgee (talk) 08:16, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Hello. I filed the 3RR report. Our friend is IP hopping:
124.168.226.60 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Thank you. Radiopathy •talk• 15:45, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi Radiopathy. I've blocked that IP. It's on a completely different ISP to the first one but the first edit to the template is pretty obvious. Sarah 00:34, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
As I said to Radiopathy, likely that they used an unsecured WiFi or another persons computer (geolocate is only useful with Telstra/Bigpond IP's as the geo info given by the ISP is more accurate). Also looks to have moved to another IP 60.240.231.203 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Bidgee (talk) 05:14, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
Hmmmm, we might have to sprot the main articles for a bit. That is probably going to be more effective than trying to play catch-up with the IPs. I'm not here much at present as its the new membership year and I have so much WMAu work to get done before the AGM so I'm not going to be very useful with blocking IPs. And you probably won't get a very quick response via the noticeboards. Are there main pages that he's focusing on which you think might be useful to sprot? Sarah 09:56, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
Take your pick from any of these - actually only the Australian ones (down to Hey Hey It's Saturday); that's what he seems to focus on. Do whatever you can - it's very much appreciated. Radiopathy •talk• 15:13, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
When you get a chance (I know you are busy so I'm in no hurry), could you block CTVDigital1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) who refuses to cite sources even though they have been warned to level 4! Bidgee (talk) 09:14, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Thank you

GregJackP Boomer! 04:34, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

That's okay. I feel very disappointed about it but when I found that comment on the mentorship page I realised he had left me with no options. Sarah 09:51, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
From me too - thanks for putting an end to it. Minor4th • talk 11:37, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
(moved from AFI page):  ::Thank you Sarah. I'm very appreciative of your considerable time invovement in this, and the outcome. I'm sure many other are too. AustexTalk 14:24, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

A humble apology

I'm sorry, Sarah. I asked Mr. Martin to stop adding biographical material to other existing articles and he took it as a personal attack to launch an ANI discussion. My only concern is that you and Salvio will be disappointed with me. I did not intend for any of this to happen, just Mr. Martin stop adding the deleted material back into other notable articles as a method of having it included even though his article got deleted. I'm sorry you are being dragged in again after you and Salvio have been so helpful. I could go on all day duking it out with Martin's crew, but none of it is worth a thing if decent, reliable people such as yourself are bothered by the drama of the affair. Nineteen Nightmares (talk) 23:47, 10 July 2010 (UTC)Nineteen Nightmares

I am disappointed and frankly, I'm fed up. You need to stop thinking of yourself as the WikiPolice, leave them alone and go and do something constructive. If you refuse to agree to leave them alone and show yourself incapable of doing so, you're going to end up banned from the site. And what benefit will come from that? I just can't understand what you think you're doing and why you think "duking it out" with them is of any benefit to anyone, least of all yourself. You can't stop Martin making the edits he's going to make. And by going down this path against everyone's advice, you're now at the stage where you won't even be able to work within Wikipedia's structures and report him to WP:COIN for spamming himself into articles. And another step forward and you won't even be able to edit this site. You need to go and agree to having no further interaction with them and then you need to go and edit articles and show the community that they weren't fools when they gave you another chance and agreed to the mentorship. There's nothing more I or Salvio or anyone else can do to help you without you taking this seriously and helping yourself. And 'helping yourself' means putting an end to this time-sink of an argument, staying away from them, and going and making useful contributions. Sarah 06:36, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
Sarah, I am unable to log in even to respond to these comments and have just found out I was blocked. I have not been to the site in several days, perhaps a week because I was fed up. Basically I already agreed very early on to stay away from the other group. I told Salvio this. I left a comment to the same effect on the ANI page. In any case, I'm done editing Wikipedia. Too much trouble, too many babies, too many passive agressive debacles that do nothing, go nowhere, are designed to harrass. I volunteer here like everybody else. When I find that being a productive editor at the site is sidetracked by useless ANI reports that solve nothing, there's very little reason to continue. I have screamed and yelled about a convicted sock that is still gaming the site. He is then able to make me the focus of an ANI? Even Salvio said there was no personal attack in what I said. Enough of the Through the Looking Glass. I'm a reader again now. The shame for Wiki, however, is losing editors who are educated and capable, but encounter so much resistence they leave the site. I saved at least two articles from AfD, Drum Workshop and Dialogic card by adding refs, editing for tone and content and so forth. One nominator even rescinded his nom after I was through because it was a notable subject and the article was improved to site standards because I took the time to research and improve the article. Did anyone notice? Does anyone say anything positive? No. Instead a group of editors that have done exactly this same thing before to others, including admins, are allowed to confuse and intimidate everyone to their way of thinking by acting as gadflys and tagging and ANIing anyone that they don't agree with. Its sick. If the supes had taken care of Mr. Martin's bad behavior in the first place, I would not have felt compelled to keep an eye on him. Instead I am banned for trying to do the right thing, even if I was somewhat rough in my responses. I'm not going to keep putting myself in the crosshairs of a bunch of petty tyrants. I have no intent to interact with those people and have said so. I have enjoyed some of my work here and you and Salvio have been exemplary in your behaviors. I'm not bitter, just tired of it. I oil paint, am rebuiding a 1949 Dodge Custom and a 1965 Ford Galaxie, in addition to playing guitar in a band and studying and training in the martial arts. I really don't have time for editing here unless I can be productive. And there's no way to be productive when a group of people report you to ANI everytime they don't get their way or are chastised for breaking site rules. 64.168.94.110 (talk) 16:38, 17 July 2010 (UTC)Nineteen Nightmares

The Wikipedia Signpost: 12 July 2010

Martin: No deliberate WP:COI

Also, on a personal note, be assured I have had and still have every intention of fully complying with my own COI-related issues which I'd like to discuss with you later so that we are on the same page and are "communicating" with each other. So there is no doubt in either of our minds as to what is OK and not OK. There has been no attempt on my part to deliberately go behind your back or to skirt the issues in a hidden way. I have placed a note on the AFI page under your comments on references regarding this issue. Note too that my edits are FAR more extensive than these few book references (including references to other publications as well): Most recent _edit historyThank you. AustexTalk 20:06, 12 July 2010 (UTC)


Reputation Management re Austex

Sarah: I know you are busy, have been gone awhile, and I imagine you don't want to talk about this, but it is important to me to protect my reputation since my block. Redeeming myself here is something I take seriously. I hope you will at least listen based on my own strong feelings about it.
First, there is so much more than can be gained by the common courtesy of communicating FIRST, individually, instead of attacking or condemning in front of all of Wikipedia. All I needed was a short note from you re the references issue, but instead you laid into me pretty good (with no AGF, using extremely strong, harsh language that leaves the impression said that I flat-out violated our agreement re COI. I don't think that such a harsh an assessment was warranted because: 1) I did the one and only La Frontera edit precisely as prescribed, and 2) the first mentionof naqy kind re references was in your harst reprimand....essentially implying that I went behind your back since the block to delierately edit where I shouldn't. After your strong reprimand I placed notice on the Austin, Texas talk page for the references to be vetted by other editors (copied below) and/or when I get back from vation in late July I will replace each one individually. But rather than sugesting to all editors the possibility of a total site ban, all you had to do was to let me know your thoughts on the references first before chastising me so harshly in the AFI discussion.


Your comments leave an impression that I have been going behind your back or deliberately skirting the issues, which I havent. And which I suspect you don't really beleive, either, do you? In fact, haven't I always come to you first to discuss most issues (such as the name change before initiating it)? But here you are threatening a topic ban, or a full site ban...???????
I do think it is important to at least clear the air, so....for your own recollection as much as mine, the comments I object to are these:
  • "I see since Martin's block expired when he promised me he would comply with WP:COI and move onto editing articles and material not related to himself, he's added 11 references to his book to the Austin, Texas article" --We have never discussed references until now.
  • "The community should also consider a topic ban prohibiting Martin from adding material about himself and his commercial interests, projects, book, etc into articles" -- I have not added such material or any edits about myself or my interests.
  • "If he wants to recommend his book or wants to add himself or his projects and other interests into articles, he should be complying with COI - as he promised me he would when his block finished" --other than the references where I have I done this? I'm not "recommending" my book any more than recommending any other book that I would reference. But regardless, I'm removing them. Just wish you had told me before telling the whole world.
  • If he continues injecting himself and his commercial interests into articles, I will be coming back here asking for a full site ban." --a full site ban????? Where am I inserting or "injecting himself" in my personal or commercial interests???? I certainly don't have any intention of doing so.


To state it again officially for the record:
  1. I have no interest or intention at all in promoting my personal interests on Wikipedia.
  2. Or to "recomend my book" includingh using it as a reference. PS - Surely there are noteworthy history book writers who edit here on the subjects they know.
  3. Or interjecting my "commercial interests."
  4. Or adding material about "myself, my projects, my commerical interests, or my business..." (which I feel that I have been unfairly accused of doing in your broad sweeping lanuage)
  5. I also promised not to re-create the two previous pages on Wikipedia and I have instead moved them to an alternate Wiki site that accepts such pages.
  6. I will "comply with COI - as he promised me that he(I) would."
But I feel like I have benn complying, have been extensively editing articles, and yet my reputation is damaged from your strong language, making it even harder now for me to move away from the bad actions of the past. And above all I want to redeem my past history here. So your consideration in help comment in some way to others that I am NOT going behid you back would be greately appreciated. AustexTalk 05:46, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
(talk page stalker) Excuse me butting in here but I don't see what the problem is with an of the above comments, you have a commercial interest in citing your own book, you may not intend that as the reason for inserting cites but it is never the less the case. It is therefore totally reasonable to make the above comments, they do not to me infer any "going behind your back". You have a number of areas in which you have a conflict of interest one of them is Austin, Texas (due to your book) the simple solution is don't edit that article and other editors won't have a problem, if you choose to ignore the conflict of interest advice on the matter you must take what ever comes your way in criticism.Codf1977 (talk) 14:48, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for your advice but with all due respect I think this is a topic I would prefer to discuss with Sarah. AustexTalk 18:14, 14 July 2010 (UTC)


Discussion re References

Because of the book ("Austin" - which is a history book) I have already chosen not edit the article's history pages as I have outlined below to avoid even the appearance of a COI. However I believe that editing the rest of the Austin, Texas article presents no particular COI just because I live in Austin. AustexTalk 15:57, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
First, before you get overly concerned, you should take a minute to check out the actual book HERE. It is always better than to communicate constuctively with each other than to make implied threats as above re "if I ignore your advice."
What implied threat is in that comment - I think you should take a moment to re-read what I said - "if you choose to ignore the conflict of interest advice on the matter" - in other words the advice on the conflict of interest page - that being don't edit pages you have a COI in. As for you assertion that you don't see why quoting your own book is not a COI then I really can't help you. Codf1977 (talk) 16:39, 18 July 2010 (UTC)


I certainly agree that quoting from the book is a COI as you said above: But I haven't quoted from the book. Your language says that I "don't see why quoting your own book is not a COI" I agree it would be. But that is not the issue. Instead what we are talking about is reference citations. And while I feel that is perhaps a gray area, nevertheless I placed the notice on the [[Austintalk page (section 17)) (also shown below)that I will not myself use the book for references AND will not edit any of the history section or any area covered by the book (approx 1890 - 1940). As for the existing refrences, Sarah said to go ahead leave them in. But instead I plan to replace them with other references (when I get home from vacation) AND/OR I will let other independent editors review them, vett them HERE (section 16), and use them if they like, or not. I beleive doing so precisely complies with the guidelines of WO:COI


Official Notice re COI re Austin, Texas

Re the current edits I have added to the Austin talk page the COI edit template (Request Edit) on July 17, 2010. After 10 days if not changed by anothre editor, I will either replace edits or leave them "as is."
To be clear, I do expect to potentially do other edits to the overall article that is not within that time perood. Other than being an Austinite, I have no conflict writing about Austin in general with thoroughly referenced citations -- for example writing about local government, the economy, climate, music or sports.....(but not Austin history).
Interestingly, from my observations on Wikipedia it appears that a large number of articles are routinely edited by editors close enough to to the article to know the subject (whether it is math issues or cities...) Thank God my name isn't William Webster. Would I then be disqualified from ALL subjects? (that's a joke) AustexTalk 19:06, 18 July 2010 (UTC)


Austin and COI

Just wanted to comment on how impressed I am with your professionalism regarding your possible conflict of interest. Thank you, and as another editor said at Talk:Austin, Texas, it's great to have an expert around. I'll be sure to check out your book next time I walk into a local bookstore; I'm a postcard person myself. Cheers, Dabomb87 (talk) 03:15, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Well....to be truthful I could not be deemed an expert by any stretch of the imagination! I have a ton to learn and am mostly learning through mistakes (usually a hard but valuable lesson). And I've learned to disclose conflicts of interest and to avoid them. But thanks very much for you kind words, however. It's very refreshing to hear, and your comments mean a lot to me. Best wishes in your editing.... AustexTalk

**** Move Discussion to Austex talk page ****

Sarah: I have no idea if this is kosher (so to speak) on Wikipedia but in order to take the burden of this evolving discussion off your (Sarah's) page I have copied over the last two entries to my own Austex for those who want to extend the discussion there. If not you are always welcome to continue to edit this page instead. For myself, I intend to use that page for my future postings on this topic. The new site is located: HERE
(PS - If you prefer we not handle it this way I'll delete it on my page and we'll continue here. Just let me know. AustexTalk 13:13, 20 July 2010 (UTC))

Notice re COI intent on the Austin, Texas article from User:Austex

(Below is a message I posted on the Austin, Texas talk page July 14, 2010.)''
Posted HERE (Sec 17)'



NOTICE OF INTENT RE POTENTIAL COI ISSUES: I'm User:Austex an Austin editor on Wikipedia. Last year I wrote a book on Austin history by Arcadia Publishing telling the history of Austin from the 1890's to about 1940 using historic collectible postcards. The book reference and reviews are HERE. Another editor has suggested that I potentially have a conflict of interest WP:COI in editing any or all sections of theAustin, Texas article having written a book the on Austin history. That seems to go a bit overboard for me. I certainly understand the obvious Conflict of Interest from using the book to edit the history section and especially from 1980-1940. But I just don't see a conflict in editing other sections outside of the "History Section" -- such as sports, climate, government, climate, etc -- as many editors on Wikipedia do edit on the subjects and cities they know and are familiar with, or have researched.
However, as of July 14, 2010, in the spirit of WP:CIV civility and showing good faith WP:AFD and for avoiding a WP:COI issue through self-disclosure, I am offering the following statement: I hereby give formal notice that I will not edit Austin, Texas history information between 1890 and 1940 (the time period of the book) and will only make edits in unaffiliated sections or general topics in the article. Furthermore I will strictly follow the COI guidelines involving my editing and will only make edits that are strictly nuetral in nature and for which I have no personal interest or POV. I have read the COI guidelines and will abide by them fully. AustexTalk 01:46, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
If any editor has concerns please leave a message at my talk page here or send an email from my main page email userbox. (updated) AustexTalk 01:46, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Signpost: 19 July 2010

User:Nineteen Nightmares requesting unblock

See this editor's talk page. You're the blocking admin, and the last comment of yours that I could find is here at ANI. Perhaps you can look at his unblock request and decide if it meets the conditions you had in mind for allowing him to resume editing: "The block is indefinite but if he agrees to leave the other users alone, he can be unblocked." I find that his request lacks clarity, and I can't determine if he meets your conditions. It seems that ANI was working on an interaction ban, and I don't know if that thread ever reached a conclusion. If you want to bargain directly with him, perhaps he will agree to a suitable interaction ban. See WP:RESTRICT#Placed by the Wikipedia community for some examples of past interaction bans. EdJohnston (talk) 03:42, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Conflict of Interest re Adding Language

FYI: The following was added both at the Round Rock, Texas talk page along witha "Request Edit Template) and to my own talk page regarding a WP:COI and to let other editors vett the issue and add it or not, without further involvement from me.

NOTE: As a former partner in "La Frontera" I have a WP:COI conflict of interest re adding the "La Frontera" name to this movie paragraph below. It kust so happens that the movie was filwed there in 1974. If any editor(s)are so inclined, and think it is relevant to the article, they may add the name on the article page roughly in the position shown below. Most articles re the movie list this location, and there are event tours to the site using the development name. If you wisdh to do so please add it in normal black text, of course, rather than copying this paragraph: AustexTalk 17:57, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

  • The Texas Chain Saw Massacre (original version) was primarily filmed in Round Rock in 1974, in a house on Quick Hill Road where the La frontera development now sits. [1] Contrary to popular belief the movie is not based on a true story.[2] Tours are still conducted by TCM groupies at the sites from the movie including the Round Rock site. Tobe Hooper, Director. 1974. [Movie FAQ's]

The Wikipedia Signpost: 26 July 2010

Martin no CIO

Sarah, I know you are busy and tired of hearing about this any longer. Me too. Let's put it to rest. But it appears that you blanked out(and also did not archive) the entire discussion where:

1) I showed you specifically how I did not do any COI edits or go behind your back. In reality I used the {request edit} process, but you had not checked to see and I suppose perhaps you were using the "other" editors' accusations. I did fully comply with and used the {requestedit} template for any and all potenital WP:COI edits;
2)I asked you to plaese inform me personally of mistakes (such as the reference citations) as a common courtesy rather than assuming I was "going behind your back" and posting such accusation on-line in a strong worded manner (including suggesting a potential TOTAL SITE BAN) leaving a strong impression that I am not be trusted;(I added a {request edit} to these immediately, and
3) my list of your specific quotes of yours were extremely your harsh, accusatory, and mostly false accusations. If it had been a normal editor saying these things, with no or little proof or checking, you would have come down on the hard on them, don't you think? You also suggested the idea oif immediate bans including a total site ban. you made about me accusing me of the abocve and again suggesting various bans. Surely at some point I get to put the sockpuppett behind me and move forward constructively unless proven otherwise.
Look, I am living up to what I said I would do. I am doing EVERYTHING I can to redeem my foolish newbie mistake by becoming a very construcive and more educated editor and staying out of CIO issues. It really, really hurts that process, however, to be accused all over again in front of everyone, when I had in fact cleaned up my act. Just look at my edit counter.(I think I have over 700 page edits). Look at my User page and see what I'm learing and doing. I'm learning a lot and doing everything 100% by the rule book as best I can (there are sooo many rules!) But I am doing everything I said to you that I would do.
So my question is this: Is it normal practice to blank out and delete, and not archive anything that is negative toward you? I realize you have every right to do so as it is your page, but you kept tons and tons of the negative items about me in your Archive 20. But not my explanation of what I am doing right. Please correct me if I am mistaken and they do appear somewhere and I just could not find them (my list of your comments were in green to be easy to find). I could be wrong and they are just somewhere else and if so I apologize. And if not I will go ahead and post them instead on my talk page and archives.
If not (and I am asking politely) I would like some sort small acknowledgement or retraction from you re your harsh statement, letting people know I was not doing what you accused me of. I think it is only common courtesy and the right thing to do re Wikipedia as well. And if so this is the last I will say of the entire subject. AustexTalk 17:29, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
PS - Disclosure: total edits through today 1,827. (424 to articles) AustexTalk 17:47, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
Do you normally make accusations and insinuations about another person's integrity without even bothering to do a cursory examination of the evidence? I ask because if you'd bothered to look at my contributions, you would have seen that I haven't edited a single page for 6 weeks and if you'd bothered to look at the history for this page you'd have known that I have not removed any messages and that your messages were archived automatically by the bot (however, people are allowed to manage their talk pages however they wish and if I wanted to blank your messages without response that would be entirely up to me). If you have issues with the way the bot works, take it up with the bot owner, but it's got nothing to do with me and it's not anything I have any control over. I was shocked when I looked at the history of this page and saw that you've edited my talk page nearly 100 times since I've been away. This is over the top, obsessive and excessive. I've got absolutely no interest in continuing discussions with you and I'm not going to be retracting anything - I stand by *everything* I have said and you need to accept that and move on. Your false accusations and insinuations that I blanked your messages in order to hide negative comments are outrageous and show a profound inability to assume good faith of others and a lack of care in checking basic facts that are freely available and only one click away. I would be grateful if you would refrain from posting more comments about this matter on this page. I am extremely busy and I'm simply not prepared to give you any more time and it is likely any further messages from you on this matter will also end up being archived by the bot without response. You really need to accept that I am very busy and am unwilling to discuss this any further with you and move on. Sarah 02:20, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
  • SIGNING OFF YOUR PAGE -- You've had your say, so let me have mine and then we'll part ways: 1) Not checking first: What you are accusing me of doing above (not checking about the auto archive) is what I was complaining about with you --namely you so HARSHLY accusing me of going behind your back to make personal edits when in fact I had used {refedit} and done it by the book. But your not seeing this or reading my note, you were suddenly -- and most rudely -- talking about "total site ban's for me going "behind your back" to avoid detection -- with your not even having checked. 2) Excessive edits to your page: Yes there were many edits on your page because while you were gone it became the primary site for all the dicussons on {refedits} and related issues. As I noted on your page, since you were apparently gone, with the consent of others, I eventually moved all that to my User page and archive so as to no longer clutter up your page as it got longer and longer (I left the message about this on your talk page, too, but apparently you did not check that either befor accusing me of making so many edits). So please don't so accuse me of not checking. And you do so in such a rude and accusatory manner. 3) Leave you alone: I'm happy to leave you alone. I've been neither excessive or obsessive (beleive me, I don't obsess over you) but I stayed in touch regularly since you were the original blocking editor and I thought that was the correct protocol as wellas teh polite and appropriate thing to do. I wasn't doing it to harrass you. 4) Over-the-top harsh: I still think you were absolutely over-the-top harsh on me in your original comments that started all this (shown above)-- and that were shown to be in error. I am shocked (to use your word) that you would say above that you still "stand behind *everything*" when if you had bothered checking (again your words toward me) you'd see that your original comments were in fact in error and were not facts. 5) Civility: There is simply no reason to be so rude toward me as you are above, and as you certainly were in your original comments as well. You take a pretty harsh tone. So.....Instead I am going to Assume Good Faith that you were too busy coming back to Wikipedia to go back and read the dialog, and I hope you will assume the same regarding me. My goal and my efforts are toward constructive editing on Wikipedia. I've done a massive amount of work on at least one article, and a fair amount on another. So, now you've had your say, and I've had mine so I agree - no more discussion on all this and lets move on. As desired I won't be coming back to your page to report in or ask questions. AustexTalk 14:38, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
PS - We are all busy. AustexTalk 14:38, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Just noting for my own records and for any other users and admins who may be investigating this user in future, the claims here: "namely you so HARSHLY accusing me of going behind your back to make personal edits when in fact I had used {refedit} and done it by the book" are utterly bogus. My allegation (supported by diffs on ANI [1]) was that this user added 11 references to his own book into the Austin, Texas article: "I see since Martin's block expired when he promised me he would comply with WP:COI and move onto editing articles and material not related to himself, he's added 11 references to his book to the Austin, Texas article" and the evidence showed that he did exactly that: [2] and [3]. Obviously adding a dozen references to one's own book to an article that routinely receives in excess of 100,000 hits a month has COI-issues and these edits were not, as the user now claims, "by the book". This has been explained to him by multiple people and given his past history of blatant WP:AUTO, WP:COI and WP:SOCK violations, which lead to me blocking him and his checkuser-confirmed socks, should there be any further problems with self-promotion, promotion of his work, or other COI-related issues, I will fully endorse a full site ban, so please do notify me if such issues recur and a proposal is made. Sarah 04:39, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Luboš Motl

As a contributor to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luboš Motl back in 2005, you may be interested to know it has been re-nominated for deletion. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luboš Motl (3rd nomination). Robofish (talk) 16:40, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 August 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 20:59, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 16:10, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 September 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:43, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 September 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 20:25, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Not sure

The thread on facebook seemed to evaporate, the emails about my unpaid membership have stopped (I am very poor at the moment) - and I cannot make head or tail of http://www.wikimedia.org.au/wiki/2010-2011_AGM apart from the fact that you seemed to do a lot of nominating - unless I am wrong in my reading of it - there is no actual clear indication of who and what the final constituent committee is ? - cheers SatuSuro 02:33, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

http://www.wikimedia.org.au/wiki/Committee - apologies - it is clear now - sorry about that SatuSuro 02:42, 20 September 2010 (UTC)
I think I do a lot of nominating because I'm the secretary (so I collect and verify all the nominations and publish them on the website) so people probably just ask me to nominate/second them as they're talking to me anyway, plus a lot of people don't know who to ask to nominate them as you can only be nominated by current financial members. Yeah, I removed you from the application queue so you won't get anymore emails now. If you decide to go ahead with your application some time, just send me an email and I'll move your application back into the queue. Sarah 07:01, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Hey youre the sec - so I expect all that - no problems - I must get off wp and go earn some money so i can join in - thanks for the reply - cheers SatuSuro 07:06, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 September 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 22:54, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 September 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 22:01, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 October 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:57, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 October 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 07:47, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 October 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:32, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Xanderliptak

I have opened an RfC/U on Xanderliptak. Since you have attempted to deal with the concerns that I raise, I have mentioned you in the RfC. The RfC is not yet certified and may not be; currently I am the sole signatory, and any RfC not accompanied by evidence showing that two users tried and failed to resolve the same dispute will be deleted after 48 hours as "uncertified". But I thought you should be made aware. Any feedback will, of course, be most welcome. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 20:27, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 October 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:55, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 November 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 04:40, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 8 November 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 17:30, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Greets!

Hi Sarah, hope you're well. I've stumbled across a milestone today by creating my second article in 4 years (go me, right?), trial as an adult. I'm still adding to the Australian-specifics of the article, but since you have a bit of an interest in crime, I thought you might be able to have the tiniest peek for me? Cheers, — Deontalk 05:44, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 November 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:20, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 November 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:26, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 22:01, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 December 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 04:11, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 December 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:48, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 December 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:53, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 December 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 13:16, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Hogmanay greeting

  Thank you very much for working with me in 2010 to make the encyclopedia a better place. Regardless of any disagreements we may have had, I want to wish you all the very best for 2011. I look forward to working with you, and I hope for health and happiness to you and your family in the year to come. I therefore send you this glass of the cratur, so you can celebrate, whether it is Hogmanay or New Year's Day where you are. Warmest regards, --John (talk) 04:58, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 3 January 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:11, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 January 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 05:46, 11 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 January 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 19:27, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 January 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:33, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:29, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 7 February 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:01, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 February 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:19, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 February 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 18:24, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 February 2011

The Signpost: 7 March 2011

The Signpost: 14 March 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:44, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 March 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:32, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 March 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:41, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 April 2011

The Signpost: 11 April 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 10:21, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 April 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 06:41, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 April 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:14, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 May 2011

The Signpost: 9 May 2011

The Signpost: 16 May 2011

The Signpost: 23 May 2011

The Signpost: 30 May 2011

The Signpost: 6 June 2011

Discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Gwillhickers

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Gwillhickers. A discussion is going on there about that editor. You are being invited because your name has been mentioned in the RfC/U. Coemgenus 15:06, 12 June 2011 (UTC) (Using {{pls}})

Melbourne meetup this Saturday

  Melbourne Meetup

 
See also: Australian events listed at Wikimedia.org.au (or on Facebook)

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup at North Melbourne this Saturday (23 July). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne 16 Hope to see you there! JVbot (talk) 05:14, 20 July 2011 (UTC) (this automated message was delivered to all users at Wikipedia:Meetup/Melbourne/Participants)

The Signpost: 25 July 2011

The Signpost: 01 August 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:54, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 August 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:15, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 August 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 09:34, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 August 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:28, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 August 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 08:55, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

WP Australian Politics in the Signpost

"WikiProject Report" would like to focus on WikiProject Australian Politics for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Other editors will also have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 16:49, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 September 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:42, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 September 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:28, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 September 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 10:31, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

sockpuppet editing

There is an open WP:SPI case looking at sockpuppet editing primarily on the Johann Hari/ Talk page. As you edited the Johann Hari/Talk page between 2004 and 2011, your input is welcomed. Yonmei (talk) 21:44, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 September 2011


Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:21, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 3 October 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 05:57, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 October 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:19, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 October 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 11:06, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 October 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 11:22, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 October 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 18:08, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 7 November2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 13:12, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 November 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 23:18, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 November 2011

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:41, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 November 2011

The Signpost: 05 December 2011

The Signpost: 12 December 2011

The Signpost: 19 December 2011

The Signpost: 26 December 2011

The Signpost: 02 January 2012

G'day!

Nice to see you back. How have you been? --John (talk) 22:39, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

G'day mate! Nice to hear from you. :) I am really good, thanks. Yourself? I noticed when I looked at messages in my archive that you sent me a New Years message last year. Thanks for that. Hope all is well with you. We really should catch up sometime. Cheers, Sarah 22:50, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
I am thriving, thanks for asking. I'll be around. I might drop you an email. Take care. --John (talk) 22:57, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 January 2012

Wikipedia Day Melbourne Meetup

Hi there. Just inviting you to the Melbourne meetup this Sunday at 11am, to celebrate our 11th anniversary. Details on that page. Hope to see you there! SteveBot (talk) 02:13, 11 January 2012 (UTC) (on behalf of Steven Zhang)

Your input is needed on the SOPA initiative

Hi Sarah,

You are receiving this message either because you expressed an opinion about the proposed SOPA blackout before full blackout and soft blackout were adequately differentiated, or because you expressed general support without specifying a preference. Please ensure that your voice is heard by clarifying your position accordingly.

Thank you.

Message delivered as per request on ANI. -- The Helpful Bot 16:41, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 January 2012

The Signpost: 23 January 2012

The Signpost: 30 January 2012

UTRS Account Request

I confirm that I have requested an account on the UTRS tool. Sarah

Hi Sarah, thank you for your interest in the UTRS tool. I've approved your account, please feel free to login and test the system.
As part of this beta test, we'd like everyone to test every aspect of the tool. This includes acting as blocked users - we'd like each of you to file at least two appeals and respond to them as though you are blocked. Please try to act like a blocked user new to Wikipedia, unfamiliar with common terms and probably a bit frustrated at the situation.
When reviewing appeals, please act as though you are reviewing real blocks. You should be able to comment on any appeal, regardless of who has reserved it; reservations only ensure that reviewers don't send conflicting emails.
If you encounter any bugs (things not appearing to work right, and especially error messages), please file a bug report on JIRA. You will need to register an account there. New features can be suggested there as well, but please add the "after-beta" label to these so we can easily prioritize between bugs that must be fixed and features that can be added later.
Thank you again for volunteering to beta-test. The Helpful One 00:00, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 February 2012

February Melbourne Meetup

Hi All. Just letting you know that we have another meetup planned for Melbourne, on Sunday, 26th February at 11am. More details can be found at the meetup page. Pizza will be provided. Look forward to seeing all of you there :-) SteveBot (talk) 23:23, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 February 2012

MSU Interview

Dear Sarah,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the community HERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.


So a few things about the interviews:

  • Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
  • Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
  • All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
  • All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
  • The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.


Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your name HERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.


Sincerely,


Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) 07:26, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Young June Sah --Yjune.sah (talk) 20:13, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

tp refactor

Curious as to why you did this? Nobody Ent 13:08, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Obviously a mistake. I was surprised to see Bish's page come up on my watchlist and had a looksee...I guess I hit the rollback button by mistake. Sarah 13:11, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
Ah. Yes, she was still listed as one of the relatively few admins willing to do a self-block (which I've fixed). Nobody Ent 13:22, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 March 2012

The Signpost: 02 April 2012

The Signpost: 09 April 2012

Teahouse barnstar

  Teahouse Barnstar
Could not find a more deserving user, for your tireless contribution to the Teahouse, extra999 (talk) 03:07, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
Uh, thanks...but I'm guessing you want User:SarahStierch? Cheers, Sarah 03:30, 14 April 2012 (UTC)
Oops! Yeah, I meant her, extra999 (talk) 06:10, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 April 2012

Abuse Filter on the Article Feedback Tool

Hey there :). You're being contacted because you're an edit filter manager, At the moment, we're developing Version 5 of the Article Feedback Tool, which you may or may not have heard about. If you haven't; for the first time, this will involve a free-text box where readers can submit comments :). Obviously, there's going to be junk, and we want to minimise that junk. To do so, we're working the Abuse Filter into the tool.

For this to work, we need people to write and maintain filters. I'd be very grateful if you could take a look at the discussion here and the attached docs, and comment and contribute! Thanks :). Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 18:30, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 April 2012

The Signpost: 30 April 2012

The Signpost: 07 May 2012

The Signpost: 14 May 2012

Possibly unfree File:John Ewart Jimmy The Argonauts 1.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:John Ewart Jimmy The Argonauts 1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:57, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi! I'm interested in it not being deleted. If you can supply me with the source information, I'd be happy to "fix it up". Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 12:23, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, I don't have any more information about it than what I had when I uploaded it over six years ago. If they want to delete a picture of a long deceased person because it was taken in 1954 and is thus in the public domain in its country of origin, then so be it. I don't have any further information about the picture and if I did, I would have added it to the image description when I uploaded it. Cheers, Sarah 23:06, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 May 2012

Request for copy of deleted article "Download sites"

Hi Sarah, I've been pointed in your direction to obtain a copy of an article stub which was rather summarily nominated for deletion and then rapidly deleted, so rapidly that I had no opportunity to respond. I'm still at loss as to why it was removed except for Jesse Viviano's comment that the nominating editor thought it might have been a 'test'. Botany articles have been most of my focus at WP and in starting the 'Download sites' article I thought that sharing some of the good databases I have come across would not be a bad idea. If you could look at the stub which was deleted and give me your opinion, it would be much appreciated. cheers Paul venter (talk) 13:54, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 May 2012

Please Userfy or Email me a copy of deleted article

Hello, I'm here to request you to kindly userfy on email me a copy of the following deleted article National Tuberculosis Institute, so that I can work out the short comings. VIVEK RAI :  Friend?  07:50, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Kindly Userfy or Email me a copy of deleted article

Hey I'm here to request you to kindly userfy on email me a copy of the following deleted article Primavera Contract Management, so that I can edit it and resubmit. thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bilal.itani (talkcontribs) 12:59, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 June 2012

The Signpost: 11 June 2012

Great American Wiknic

We'll be meeting at West Branch Library noon to 4 p.m. on June 30th. See you soon! Bob the WikipediaN (talkcontribs) 02:57, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 June 2012

Wikinic - last minute planning

The Wiknic is nearly upon us! We need to figure out who can bring different food items; please reply at Wikipedia talk:Meetup/Evansville/Wiknic/2012#Food. Thanks! Bob the WikipediaN (talkcontribs) 22:52, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 June 2012

The Signpost: 02 July 2012

Request for Rollback

I am on English Wikipedia since June 2011. I face vandalism from diferent users when I am active. I am familiar distinguishing vandalism from good-faithed edits. It would be very helpful to work against vandalism if you grant me rollback permission. Regards. ZiaKhan 19:09, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

No wories, I've just read the Rollback and I'll use it correctly. Thanks. ZiaKhan 20:03, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

WikiWomen's Luncheon at Wikimania 2012

WikiWomen's Luncheon at Wikimania - You are invited!
Are you a woman attending Wikimania 2012? If so, join us on Saturday, July 14, for the annual WikiWomen's Luncheon (fka WikiChix Lunch) This event is for any women attending Wikimania. Pick up your lunch, compliments of Wikimania, and join us at 1:30pm in the Grand Ballroom for a lively facilitated discussion hosted by Sue Gardner. We look forward to seeing you there. Please sign up here.
Sarah (talk) 18:12, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 July 2012

Credo Reference Update & Survey (your opinion requested)

Credo Reference, who generously donated 400 free Credo 250 research accounts to Wikipedia editors over the past two years, has offered to expand the program to include 100 additional reference resources. Credo wants Wikipedia editors to select which resources they want most. So, we put together a quick survey to do that:

It also asks some basic questions about what you like about the Credo program and what you might want to improve.

At this time only the initial 400 editors have accounts, but even if you do not have an account, you still might want to weigh in on which resources would be most valuable for the community (for example, through WikiProject Resource Exchange).

Also, if you have an account but no longer want to use it, please leave me a note so another editor can take your spot.

If you have any other questions or comments, drop by my talk page or email me at wikiocaasi@yahoo.com. Cheers! Ocaasi t | c 17:31, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 July 2012

The Signpost: 23 July 2012

The Signpost: 30 July 2012

The Signpost: 06 August 2012

You have been missed

I doubt you remember me at all (I previously edited under the monicker "Master&Expert"), but I do feel as if I've spoken to you at some point or another (or otherwise I mentioned you elsewhere at some venue or another). Even if we haven't interacted, I've definitely seen you around quite a bit in the past and have greatly valued your insight on Wikipedia's most complex issues. Even if you opt against returning to active editing in the future, at least know that you are always welcome here on Wikipedia. You're one of the good ones.

Good luck. =) Kurtis (talk) 12:42, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 August 2012

The Signpost: 13 August 2012

The Signpost: 20 August 2012

Bangla (band)

Hi! Hope everything's well. I was searching for the article titled Bangla (band) and found that it was deleted on 20 December 2007 because of lack of significance of the band. I want to rewrite the article with providing proper reliable sources claiming the band's notability. It would be helpful for me if you can userfy the deleted article in the draft space User:Kmzayeem/Bangla (band). Thanks --Zayeemtalk 17:01, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

You have been missed

I doubt you remember me at all (I previously edited under the monicker "Master&Expert"), but I do feel as if I've spoken to you at some point or another (or otherwise I mentioned you elsewhere at some venue or another). Even if we haven't interacted, I've definitely seen you around quite a bit in the past and have greatly valued your insight on Wikipedia's most complex issues. Even if you opt against returning to active editing in the future, at least know that you are always welcome here on Wikipedia. You're one of the good ones.

Good luck. =) Kurtis (talk) 12:42, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you so much, Kurtis. I really appreciate your kind comments. Of course, I certainly remember you as Master&Expert. I am not sure that we ever edited the same articles but I do remember you from noticeboards and discussions etc. Thanks again for your kind comments and for taking the time to leave me a message. I do appreciate it very much. Cheers, Sarah 23:57, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Not a problem, glad to have made your day. In other news, I have become part of the "Wikipedians using their first name as their username" club. Very prestigious group of people, we are. ;)
Take care. =) Kurtis (talk) 22:52, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 August 2012

The Signpost: 03 September 2012

The Signpost: 10 September 2012

Happy 7th Wikipedia Anniversary to you :)

Hi Sarah :) Greetings on your 7th Wikipedia Anniversary since your joining of Wikipedia on 12 September, 2005! Best Wishes. Regards and Happy Editing! TheGeneralUser (talk) 20:10, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Email

 
Hello, Sarah. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Dejapasencore (talk) 19:45, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
I've responded. Cheers, Sarah 23:48, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 October 2012

The Signpost: 15 October 2012

The Signpost: 22 October 2012

The Signpost: 29 October 2012

How are you?

Been awhile since we've seen you on en Wiki and Commons! Still in the USA? Will be over in the USA in late November until mid December (heading to the Nor-Am Cup to photograph and no doubt report [WikiNews] at Copper Mountain, Colorado), so it's going to be interesting to meet-up with people at San Francisco and Denver. Bidgee (talk) 09:51, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi Bidgee, good to hear from you! Yeah, still here and looking forward to my third Thanksgiving and white Christmas. :) Let me know if you get further east-it would be great to see you. I'm about 90 minutes outside Louisville, Kentucky. Hope you have a safe trip and an awesome time. Sarah 23:38, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 November 2012

The Signpost: 12 November 2012

The Signpost: 19 November 2012

The Signpost: 26 November 2012

The Signpost: 03 December 2012

The Signpost: 10 December 2012

The Signpost: 17 December 2012

Merry Christmas!

Hello Sarah! Wishing you a very Happy Merry Christmas :) TheGeneralUser (talk) 13:49, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 December 2012

The Signpost: 31 December 2012

The Signpost: 07 January 2013

Rollbacker Rights

Can you grant me rollbacker rights please? Hiaw777 ( Talk ) 20:39, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 January 2013

The Signpost: 21 January 2013

The Signpost: 28 January 2013

The Signpost: 04 February 2013

The Signpost: 11 February 2013

The Signpost: 18 February 2013

The Signpost: 25 February 2013

The Signpost: 04 March 2013

The Signpost: 11 March 2013

Great American Wiknic

Hi! It's that time of year again-- this year's Wiknic will be held in Bloomington. We're still in the initial planning stages. Hope to see you in June! Bob the WikipediaN (talkcontribs) 21:11, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks Bob. Sarah 01:03, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 April 2013

The Signpost: 22 April 2013

The Signpost: 29 April 2013

RfC:Infobox Road proposal

WP:AURD (Australian Roads), is inviting comment on a proposal to convert Australian road articles to {{infobox road}}. Please come and discuss. The vote will be after concerns have been looked into.

You are being notified as a member on the list of WP:AUS

Nbound (talk) 06:09, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 May 2013

The Signpost: 13 May 2013

The Signpost: 20 May 2013

The Signpost: 27 May 2013

The Signpost: 05 June 2013

The Signpost: 12 June 2013

The Signpost: 19 June 2013

The Signpost: 26 June 2013

The Signpost: 03 July 2013

The Signpost: 10 July 2013

The Signpost: 17 July 2013

The Signpost: 21 August 2013

The Signpost: 28 August 2013

The Signpost: 04 September 2013

The Signpost: 11 September 2013

The Signpost: 16 October 2013

The Signpost: 23 October 2013

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

 

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter


Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 20:17, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 October 2013

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

 

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter


Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 20:17, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 October 2013

The Signpost: 06 November 2013

The Signpost: 13 November 2013

The Signpost: 20 November 2013

The Signpost: 04 December 2013

The Wikipedia Library Survey

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi t | c 14:59, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 December 2013

The Signpost: 08 January 2014

The Signpost: 15 January 2014

The Signpost: 19 March 2014

Jasper Harris

Hi, and thanks for your recent edits to Holland Park School. I notice that you deleted Jasper Harris from the list of the school's notable former pupils, which struck me as a little odd. I believe he's a child (or by now probably teen) actor who's been in a couple of BBC productions. I don't have any particular problem with leaving him "deleted" for now, since I don't have a firm view on his notability, but it's possible that he'll re-appear on this list in due course, particularly if someone creates an article about him in his own right. RomanSpa (talk) 12:16, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I deleted Jasper from the list because the link was red and there were no references or sources cited to support the claim that he is notable. I googled his name and looked at his credits on IMDB but saw nothing that indicated he is a notable actor. I have no problem with his inclusion (or his having a biography) if he is indeed notable, but there needs to be citations that establish his notability under Wikipedia's policies. Cheers, Sarah 12:58, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Agreed. I'm not sure whether things like IMDB count as reliable references, so I'm quite happy to leave this until an expert on TV and film actors decides to create Jasper Harris. RomanSpa (talk) 13:46, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
IMDB is definitely not a reliable source for article content and it shouldn't be used for citations, but it can be useful for credit lists. So I was not meaning to suggest that IMDB should be used as a source. I had just looked at it to see if he had many film/tv credits (they have him listed for four credits plus one uncredited part). As I said before, I have no problem with him being included or having his own biography if someone makes a case for his notability but my feeling is it would be premature because there really doesn't seem to be much in the way of reliable independent secondary sources to support a claim of notability. Sarah 14:12, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
Cool. :-) RomanSpa (talk) 15:19, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Request for permission

Hello Sarah, my name is Jim Cartar. I'm a recent changes patroller, so I have to face numerous vandals and non-constructive edits by non-registered users daily. Actually I don't use WP:TWINKLE to revert changes and hence it is very much problematic for me to revert changes. So, I was wondering if you can grant me rollback rights. I have already been trusted and given reviewer rights. So please let me know if you can do something. Thank you. Jim Carter (talk) 15:23, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 May 2014

Request for comment

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Evansville Wiknic 2014

It's time to start planning our Wiknic! This year Evansville is hosting. Bob the WikipediaN (talkcontribs) 18:33, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, Bob. Sarah 09:51, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 June 2014

The Signpost: 18 June 2014

Happy birthday!!!

Thanks! Sarah 12:43, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 July 2014

Stanton Griffis

Hi Sarah, I sent you an email and was told to let you know via this communication line. Respectfully, Ngriffis (talk) 17:18, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Wow! That was seven years ago! I have replied to your email. Regards, Sarah 23:10, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 August 2014

Magdalene asylum Thank you for posting on the talk page

I have only just been introduced to this situation, and have been looking for assistance. I have been in contact with other members, and it was suggested that I turn to the projects pages for guidance and I have done so. I am in agreement that it it is not appropriate to be WP:EW over such an issue as tagging. The issue that seems apparent to me, is that the user User:Signedzzz has aggressively been following his own agenda. I only looked at this article at the request of one of the users that has been contributing on a regular basis. If you have any guidance or suggestions beyond the ones listed above, that would be wonderful! Also, I don't think it was intentional, but the link you put for dispute resolution, linked to the WPDR radio station. I couldn't decide which dispute resolution would be appropriate, as since it seems to be related to a user concern, I couldn't decide if the notice board was appropriate or WP:DRN. Thank you very much! Jab843 (talk) 02:50, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Wow: I see that you're an administrator and an Awesome Wikipedian. I assume that you just made a mistake! No problem. zzz (talk) 08:39, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 August 2014

re. Copyvio on Ronald Ryan

Hi Sarah, thanks for informing me about my Copyvio contribution and citation on Ronald Ryan. I note you have reverted my recent edit, but I also note there are several Copyvio contributions from other users, which you have not reverted. I am a little confused on how I should 'rewrite' information in my own words, when other users have clearly not done this throughout the entire article. Can you please advise me further. Many thanks. 124.190.148.57 (talk) 00:39, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 August 2014

The Signpost: 27 August 2014

Redirect issues

Dear administrator, I would like to ask for your assistance in correcting some wrong redirects in many article names related to the geography in Armenia. The following pages should have their redirects changed:

Great Thanks.--Zyzzzzzy (talk) 04:23, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Zyzzzzzy, I'm confused why you need an administrator to do that? The redirects are not protected so you should be able to go to the redirect page and simply change the target page. For example, if you go to Dzorak, you should be able to change the redirect from #REDIRECT [[Zorak, Armenia]] to #REDIRECT [[Zorak, Syunik]], save the page and the redirect will now go to the new target page. I think you will only need an administrator if the redirect page is protected. I am reluctant to change the redirects myself because I don't know about this topic area and have not been given any information supporting the idea that they should be changed. Sarah 07:54, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
Really appreciated for the useful information.--Zyzzzzzy (talk) 13:50, 2 September 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 October 2014

The Signpost: 08 October 2014

Delete page permanently

Can you help me delete this page Bangkok International Preparatory and Secondary School (Bangkok Prep)

I do not want it to show up on Google search.Supriyasrikuruwal (talk) 05:39, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

It has already been deleted. You will have to nominate the other one for deletion and explain why it should be deleted under Wikipedia policy if you want that removed, too. Sarah 11:57, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 October 2014

Special:Undelete/User:Finneeeeee

Can you tell me what was the text of the pre-deleted text? (wihtout CSD template or such) I need the data for LTA.  Revi 11:44, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

All it said was: 192345566778ㅑㅕㅗㅑㅑㅑㅑ6677. Sarah 14:22, 13 December 2014 (UTC)
Thanks.    Revi 14:28, 13 December 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 December 2014

The Signpost: 24 December 2014

Standard offer

Hi, I hope you may be able to help me.

Could you please organise a review of my ban, because I want to work on Wikipedia articles about the Sinai and Palestine campaigns of World War 1, and have them looking their best for their centenary. I have not attempted any sockpuppetry or block evasion since being banned in January this year. I also have "a better editing record and a spotlessly clean block sheet" according to Hawkeye7 (talk) 11:19, 22 November 2014 (UTC).

Alternatively, can you offer me any advice as to how best to proceed? --Rskp (talk) 04:26, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

Standard offer only applies to people who are banned or indefinitely blocked from Wikipedia. It looks like you are just topic banned via Arbitration Enforcement. Have you looked at Banning policy#Arbitration enforcement bans? I think you are going to need to follow the instructions set down there and appeal via either AE or AN. Regards, Sarah 02:32, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
I happened to see this discussion. Some of User:RoslynSKP's restrictions have expired, but there is still two left. The more serious one is at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Ottoman Empire–Turkey naming dispute#RoslynSKP suspended topic ban. The wording suggests you might be able to appeal that restriction at WP:AE. Rskp could ask User:Sandstein for his advice, since he's the admin who issued the last block. If AE doesn't work out, you would need to ask Arbcom per WP:ARCA to lift the restriction. They would most likely want to see evidence that the problem has gone away. EdJohnston (talk) 02:55, 29 December 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 January 2015

The Signpost: 28 January 2015

The Signpost: 04 February 2015

The Signpost: 11 February 2015

The Signpost: 18 February 2015

The Signpost: 25 February 2015

The Signpost: 25 February 2015

The Signpost: 04 March 2015

The Signpost: 11 March 2015

The Signpost: 18 March 2015

.

EddieSegoura Ban Appeal

Hello. I am notifying you that the above is currently being considered at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Community de facto ban appeal by User:EddieSegoura, and your input (positive, negative, or otherwise) is invited there. You have received this notification and invitation as you participated in the previous ban appeal in 2009 and may be familiar with or remember some of the earlier context, you may be aware of other matters which are relevant to the appeal, or you may wish to express whether or not your view has changed since the last discussion. Regards, Ncmvocalist (talk) 18:47, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Miley Cyrus and Ronald McDonald edits

Hi Sarah,

I am so glad you deleted my posts!! I am actually a high school teacher and wanted to prove a point that wiki is an awesome and correct site for referencing. To prove my point, I did the Miley and Ronald pages to show how random and popular wiki sites are maintained and that yes you can edit, but if it is not approved it will very quickly be deleted.

This proves my point on why wiki should be allowed to be sourced.

Sorry for being a painful edit! Hope you now understand my reasons :-)

Have a great day,

Smiles,

Leonie (peggyleeee) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peggyleelee (talkcontribs) 12:16, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 May 2015

The Signpost: 27 May 2015

The Signpost: 03 June 2015

Dear Administrator,

This is regarding a deletion of my username and ip address from the revision history of the page 'M.Kannappan'.I would like to remove my personal details from the revision history page as i didn't realize it would stay there publicly as i had done the edits when i was begginning to use Wiki.

It would be great if you could delete my username and ip address from the revision history due to personal privacy concerns.

Below is the link for the page https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=M._Kannappan&action=history

Many thanks


Kind regards,

Kathir — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kathiravan 4747 (talkcontribs) 04:40, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 June 2015

The Signpost: 17 June 2015

The Signpost: 24 June 2015

The Signpost: 26 August 2015

The Signpost: 02 September 2015

Invitation to subscribe to the edit filter mailing list

Hi, as a user in the edit filter manager user group we wanted to let you know about the new wikipedia-en-editfilters mailing list. As part of our recent efforts to improve the use of edit filters on the English Wikipedia it has been established as a venue for internal discussion by edit filter managers regarding private filters (those only viewable by administrators and edit filter managers) and also as a means by which non-admins can ask questions about hidden filters that wouldn't be appropriate to discuss on-wiki. As an edit filter manager we encourage you to subscribe; the more users we have in the mailing list the more useful it will be to the community. If you subscribe we will send a short email to you through Wikipedia to confirm your subscription, but let us know if you'd prefer another method of verification. I'd also like to take the opportunity to invite you to contribute to the proposed guideline for edit filter use at WP:Edit filter/Draft and the associated talk page. Thank you! Sam Walton (talk) and MusikAnimal talk 18:22, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 September 2015

The Signpost: 04 November 2015

Two4one, a barnstar and an olive branch

  The Indiana Barnstar
Sarah, I wanted to thank you for your excellent additions at Hobart, Indiana, my hometown. I'm far away from there now, and I appreciate your reference improvements to the Notable people list. Most of the people on that list had been in my home at one time or another. Also, considering the bad foot we got off on, the regifting of this award, the first one I ever got (and from someone named Sarah, no less), seemed especially appropriate. Thanks for the schooling, and thanks for your work. John from Idegon (talk) 07:12, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Thank you, John. I really appreciate that very much. Sarah 02:27, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 January 2016

The Signpost: 13 January 2016

The Signpost: 20 January 2016

The Signpost: 27 January 2016

The Signpost: 09 March 2016

Murder of Kylie Maybury

Murder of Kylie Maybury could do a quick look and once over from you just in case i didn't spot an error or omission. Paul Benjamin Austin (talk) 21:21, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 March 2016

The Signpost: 23 March 2016

The Signpost: 1 April 2016

The Signpost: 14 April 2016

The Signpost: 24 April 2016

The Signpost: 2 May 2016

The Signpost: 17 May 2016

The Signpost: 28 May 2016

The Signpost: 05 June 2016

The Signpost: 15 June 2016

The Signpost: 04 July 2016

The Signpost: 21 July 2016

The Signpost: 04 August 2016

The Signpost: 18 August 2016

The Signpost: 06 September 2016

Extended confirmed protection

Hello, Sarah. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

  • Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
  • A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 September 2016

The Signpost: 14 October 2016

The Signpost: 4 November 2016

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

A new user right for New Page Patrollers

Hi Sarah.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sarah. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 November 2016

The Signpost: 22 December 2016

Happy Hogmanay!

  Happy Hogmanay!
Wishing you and yours a Happy Hogmanay. May the year ahead be productive and harmonious. --John (talk) 21:26, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 February 2017

Fair Use in Australia discussion

As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

Unprotection of User:Sarah/PT

Hello Sarah. Your page at User:Sarah/PT employs the {{Protected title}} template which is now marked as historical. Please see my closure of this request at RFPP. The cascade protection of these titles to prevent their recreation appears to be obsolete, per the message in {{PT personal}} and I have undone it. If you think that any of the listed pages need continued salting, you could use the normal protection interface to handle them. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 02:27, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 9 June 2017

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago

Awesome
 
Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:18, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 June 2017

  1. ^ Tim Hardin. "Texas Chainsaw Massacre (FAQs)". Retrieved July 23, 2010.
  2. ^ Texas Chainsaw Tours ltd website. "Texas Chainsaw Massacre Tours". web site. Retrieved July 23, 2010.