User talk:Maile66/Archive 8
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Maile66. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 |
List of U.S. states and territories by population
I admit that I don't ever use RFPP and so don't know the usual requirements for protection/unprotection. But can you please explain why this page needed to be unprotected? Edits to population tables like this can be really subtle and hard to check. kennethaw88 • talk 04:29, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
- kennethaw88 It was based on this response from the original protecting admin Gonzo fan2007. You are welcome to list it at RFPP to be protected again, but if you do so, please copy over the diff link I provided. When I look into the history now, I don't see where it was ever protected, only the log where I unprotected it. Something is missing in the article's history. The only way I came up with the above link was to search through the RFPP edit history. But the diff has a link where it shows Gonzo fan2007's original protection edit. — Maile (talk) 12:37, 31 December 2017 (UTC)
- Again, I don't have any opinion either way on the future protection of the article. I will say that if I was looking at this objectively, it's only averaging about 10 edits a month. That's not too difficult to keep clean, although I understand that subtle vandalism may be more difficult to detect on these types of pages. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 23:21, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
Sblakely17
Hi, in this diff you wrote 'page deleted' - which page? Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 16:52, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Curb Safe Charmer: My error. It was the draft of the article that was deleted. I've restored your report to AIV. Sorry about that. — Maile (talk) 17:04, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Shawka dam
FYI - from User talk:86.98.9.118
Thank you for your constructive edit to the List of Dams. It's a shame that it was interpreted as as "Test Edit" by an over-zealous senior editor who didn't bother to do basic research. I have readded your minimalist, but correct, work. I hope that that edit wasnt directly associated with you being BLOCKED, but I am sure that your status will be reprised. Regards Chienlit (talk) 14:10, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
- one good edit in a sea of tests and vandalism deserves both praise and encouragement.Chienlit (talk) 14:18, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Edgar181: is the admin who made that block. You are welcome to address your concerns to him. — Maile (talk) 14:44, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
207.203.58.13
If that edit violates WP:DOX, then almost every single instance of {{Shared IP edu}} violates it as well. The intent wasn't to harass anyone or out anyone's identity, but to make a comment based on the WHOIS (FIRN = Florida Information Resource Network). I just didn't feel like broadcasting to the likes of some of the administrators that it was a school so they'd block it for six years over minor vandalism, and tagging it the usual way with {{Shared IP edu}} or {{Shared IP gov}} actually would have been more invasive. PCHS-NJROTC (Messages)Have a blessed day. 20:02, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
- (tps) Yeah, that's hardly doxing, considering that the geolocate and Whois links at the bottom of the IP talk and contribs pages provide the same information. Cheers —DoRD (talk) 20:23, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
- Not even considering that, the posting of geolocation information narrows it down to a pool of 42,200 people, considering I didn't specify that it was a school IP... PCHS-NJROTC (Messages)Have a blessed day. 20:30, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Template for Tony Hillerman
Hello, I made the template for Tony Hillerman, and tested it by using Preview in my sandbox. I used the Sue Grafton template as my model. I learned I save it to Template: Tony Hillerman and do it just like starting an article, and there is the rub. I started only one article, and did that by writing it in my sandbox and submitting it. Then it had to pass muster by several reviewers before it was posted. I think there is another way, but I do not know that way. How do I post my text to its title? Thank you. --Prairieplant (talk) 23:24, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
- Oh. I didn't realize you'd only created one article. OK, I just created User:Prairieplant/Hillerman for you. Open that, and paste the Tony Hillerman template beneath that user page template that is at the top. Work on the template there, and save it there as many times as you need to get it looking like you want it to. Once the template looks like you want, save it there one more time. Then do a Copy of the entire page, minus the user page template at the top. Open Template:Tony Hillerman, and paste the template in there. Then Save. — Maile (talk) 23:40, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
- Prairieplant Congratulations! I see you did it. Looks good. Now, with your user subpage Prairieplant/Hillerman, you can do anything you want. You can have it deleted. Or you can use it for future sandbox work. Just because the user subpage says Hillerman doesn't mean you have to reserve it for only Hillerman's stuff. You can reuse the user page for anything you want to experiment with. — Maile (talk) 00:29, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you for your help! I have been wanting to do a navbox for his novels for a long time, now I get it. Adding to each article on his books now. Most of my editing has been on stub articles to make them real articles, and once I paired with an editor to write an article that got mentioned on the Wikipedia page. Slowly expanding my repertoire. --Prairieplant (talk) 00:33, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
- Prairieplant Hooray! FYI, I noticed this in the first place because this morning I created Anne Hillerman, and am considering (maybe) doing articles on each of her Leaphorn/Chee books. That series is among my all-time favorites of literature. — Maile (talk) 00:39, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you for your help! I have been wanting to do a navbox for his novels for a long time, now I get it. Adding to each article on his books now. Most of my editing has been on stub articles to make them real articles, and once I paired with an editor to write an article that got mentioned on the Wikipedia page. Slowly expanding my repertoire. --Prairieplant (talk) 00:33, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
- Prairieplant Congratulations! I see you did it. Looks good. Now, with your user subpage Prairieplant/Hillerman, you can do anything you want. You can have it deleted. Or you can use it for future sandbox work. Just because the user subpage says Hillerman doesn't mean you have to reserve it for only Hillerman's stuff. You can reuse the user page for anything you want to experiment with. — Maile (talk) 00:29, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
- Mine, too. I had such fun finding the material in the U of New Mexico library on his books. I was thinking Anne Hillerman should have her own series, even if she picked up her father's characters. Something to ponder. This issue arises with Agatha Christie, with her estate authorizing new titles by new authors using her characters. Does Wikipedia follow the lead of the Christie estate, or start a new series of the authorized titles? --Prairieplant (talk) 00:48, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
- Are you referring to a navbox template? Don't know what the official policy is, but it's probably author-specific. Anne would get her own navbox, if there were articles created. Without the articles for the novels, a navbox isn't a good idea. Did you by any chance see the three PBS adaptations - Skinwalkers, A Thief of Time and Coyote Waits? The casting on those was perfect - everything worked. — Maile (talk) 00:57, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
- Mine, too. I had such fun finding the material in the U of New Mexico library on his books. I was thinking Anne Hillerman should have her own series, even if she picked up her father's characters. Something to ponder. This issue arises with Agatha Christie, with her estate authorizing new titles by new authors using her characters. Does Wikipedia follow the lead of the Christie estate, or start a new series of the authorized titles? --Prairieplant (talk) 00:48, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
LegerPrime
Hello, just curious why you blocked this user? Only one of the edits given at ANI actually involved adding unsourced content. Were the other edits vandalism in some sense, whether hoaxing by adding stuff not in a cited source, or hoaxing by presenting fake sources, or something else? I didn't see a point in checking the content when you'd already done the block (I'd need to ask you anyway), so why try to determine your reasons when I could get your line of thought by asking you. I'm tempted to grant the unblock request, but I'm confused about the situation: everyone involved seems to be really solidly convinced that this user's been quite disruptive, so I'm guessing that I've missed something. Nyttend (talk) 12:33, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Nyttend The length of the block was based on previous blocks. The reason for the block was AIV request. The ANI post today has nothing to do with me. Please feel free to unblock if you feel it was incorrect. — Maile (talk) 12:59, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- (1) I actually don't remember the block length; all I meant was the idea of the block per se. (2) I was totally unaware of the AIV report; I figured this was the result of the ANI thread. (3) Thank you for that permission. I'll evaluate the ANI and AIV reports carefully before accepting or rejecting the request, of course. Nyttend (talk) 00:10, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
Hi!
I wonder if you´d consider lifting the protection a little early, there´s an edit I´d like to make. I can wait a day or two, but the beligerents have behaved towards each other, AFAIK. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:39, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- No. Protection expires tomorrow on its own. — Maile (talk) 12:19, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- Alright. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 12:31, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
- No. Protection expires tomorrow on its own. — Maile (talk) 12:19, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
User:100.34.151.65
Hi. User:100.34.151.65 appears to be continuing the same pattern of edits for which you blocked him or her two weeks ago. Could you take another look?--Srleffler (talk) 03:27, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
- One-week block this time. If this happens again, and it seems likely, you might once again try at AIV. Long-term blocks on IPs are iffy, but you might find someone at AIV who has no reservations about that. — Maile (talk) 13:24, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
Regarding an IP
Was Special:Contributions/2601:40:C200:507E:B543:B765:D85:2B04 creating hoaxes? Honestly, I think they weren't here to damage the encyclopedia, and should appeal the block. As an admin who can see deleted contribs, what do you think? Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 04:31, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
- In less than 2 hours, the block will expire anyway. Here's the AIV diff. Did you check the list of deleted contributions? — Maile (talk) 12:09, 7 March 2018 (UTC)
GA review
Great job with the articles on famous Hawaiian women. Really busy with real life so not much work on my end although possibly going to do articles on Irene Ii and Sarai Hiwauli Ii in the near future. I was wondering have you done a GA review before? Seeing if you be free to review 1892 Legislative Session of the Kingdom of Hawaii for GA status. Mahalo.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 02:57, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
- On it. — Maile (talk) 12:57, 16 March 2018 (UTC)
User:Исмаил Рагимов
User:Исмаил Рагимов has again WP:SNEAKY changed a number: [1]. I see you blocked him for a day for similar 6 month ago, so would you consider doing it again? For longer? I checked the original source and this was not a correction. Thanks. Rwendland (talk) 15:42, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
- His first block was 24 hours, and the only block he's had in the 10 months he'd been editing. He made the edit you linked 3 days ago, and was the only edit he had made for a week, and has not edited since. By AIV guidelines, this is considered a stale report. Decline to block. — Maile (talk) 18:29, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
You rock
Was about to ping you at WT:DYK because I had one hook at prep 6 and could not promote. You are awesome. Alex Shih (talk) 22:30, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Move
Can you move Helio Koa'eloa to Helio Koaʻeloa? Title is blacklisted and requires an admin. And Hulihe'e Palace to Huliheʻe Palace.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 04:11, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
Good article request rejected
May one remove his Good Article request from its talk page after it has been rejected? Jzsj (talk) 15:26, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
- BlueMoonset can you provide an answer to this question? — Maile (talk) 15:31, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
- Jzsj, no, you should never remove a past Good Article request once it has been reviewed. The article's history should always remain on the talk page. I believe you may be inquiring about Talk:Theology of Pope Francis; if you wish to make a new nomination, the old one stays as is and you add a new template at the top of the page, just like you would add it (per the GA nomination instructions page) if there hadn't been a previous nomination. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:43, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for the quick response, Jzsj (talk) 18:07, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
- Jzsj, no, you should never remove a past Good Article request once it has been reviewed. The article's history should always remain on the talk page. I believe you may be inquiring about Talk:Theology of Pope Francis; if you wish to make a new nomination, the old one stays as is and you add a new template at the top of the page, just like you would add it (per the GA nomination instructions page) if there hadn't been a previous nomination. BlueMoonset (talk) 17:43, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
Secretary of Hawaii
Do you know what the position Secretary of Hawaii [2] involved? It seems to be almost like lieutenant governor (the second person in the hierarchy of the executive branch of the Territory of Hawaii).--KAVEBEAR (talk) 23:21, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
- I don't know, but your guess makes sense since the current Lieutenant Governor of Hawaii is also considered Secretary. George R. Carter went directly from being Secretary to being Governor on the same day, so that must be the explanation. — Maile (talk) 23:41, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
Hi, a new user just moved this DYK template page, not knowing that we just needed to reformat the template. Could you undo the move? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 22:29, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Yoninah: Did I do it correctly for you? — Maile (talk) 22:41, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you, but now the page is called Template:Template:Did you know nominations/Kayrat Ryskulbekov. Can you delete one of the Templates? Yoninah (talk) 23:07, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
- It looks good now! Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 23:21, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you, but now the page is called Template:Template:Did you know nominations/Kayrat Ryskulbekov. Can you delete one of the Templates? Yoninah (talk) 23:07, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Sock
Seems like Krajoyn has a new sock: Boardrockus (talk · contribs) HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 06:06, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
- I don't know who this is, I see so many. But looks like another admin has blocked this one. — Maile (talk) 10:47, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Portal:Mandatory Palestine
Why did you delete Portal:Mandatory Palestine and its talk page?! Sokuya (talk) 16:17, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- It was at CSD, tagged for deletion by The Transhumanist. Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)/RfC: Ending the system of portals. You can consult The Transhumanist about this, or perhaps post at WP:VPP — Maile (talk) 16:25, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- I tagged a number of portals per CSD P2, during routine clean up. Note that speedy deleted pages can be restored upon request by an editor with the intent to work on them, or they can be recreated without having to get approval first. Our new tools make creating a new portal easy, and shouldn't take more than an hour or so from start to finish. That portal was mostly an empty shell. I hope this explanation has helped.
- I've kept a record of all the (incomplete) portals that were speedy deleted, so that we don't lose track of them, so they can be remade later, after the automation process has been fully developed. I'm hoping to get the portal building process reduced from hours to minutes. Sincerely, — The Transhumanist 19:07, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- @The Transhumanist: I'm joining the question - portal:Mandatory Palestine was quite important for many reasons. If the portal system remains, then we need it back.GreyShark (dibra) 05:32, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deletion of Portal:Military in Pakistan
Just wanted to ask you the problems that this portal had, So that we can remake a better version of this Portal. Regards; — Paki Buraq (talk) , 30 May 2018 (UTC)
- Paki Buraq This was actually one of a larger batch of portals that were listed on Category:Candidates for speedy deletion. I deleted it as part of that. It was nominated for deletion by The Transhumanist, so that would be the editor to put your question to. — Maile (talk) 16:55, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
- The portals I marked for speedy deletion were either empty shells, or only had 2 article excerpts or less in them. So, building a page from scratch will quickly have more meat than the portals that were deleted. Keep in mind that an admin can undelete a speedy deleted page upon request, if you'd rather work on that version rather than starting over. But, I think you will find that {{Box portal skeleton}} works much better these days than it used to. So it is probably easier to start over with that. ;) It generates the content of several of the sections automatically, and reduces reliance on subpages. Let me know if you need help during the process. Cheers. — The Transhumanist 19:21, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi, another user proposed a merge of Zion Square to Downtown Triangle (Jerusalem) back in May. Now he's asking for it to be closed with a short summary. Would you be able to help here? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 15:22, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
- Yoninah Am I closing this as no consensus to merge? I read the thread, and it looks like the other editor just stopped replying there. Should I also remove the proposed merge tags from both articles? Please advise. — Maile (talk) 16:05, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
- In fact, I think that it is necessary to merge and my colleagues in the Arabic Wikipedia suggested that because, although they are separate areas, but the articles have the same history and the same landmarks, I think that the article Zion Square should be placed as a section in Downtown Triangle (Jerusalem)--Anass (talk) 16:28, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
- Well, I just closed it as "No consensus", because I don't see one there. You want a merge, and Yoninah opposes it. Nobody else participated in the discussion. So, why did you request the discussion be closed? — Maile (talk) 16:34, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
- Why do not you participate as a third party?--Anass (talk) 16:46, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
- Anass I asked Maile66 because we need an uninvolved administrator to close the discussion, per your request. Thanks for helping here, Maile. Could you also remove the merge tags from the tops of Downtown Triangle (Jerusalem) and Zion Square? As I explained to Anass during the merge discussion, it makes no sense to bloat the GA article about the Downtown Triangle with more GA material from the Zion Square article. This is a legitimate example of WP:SPINOFF. Yoninah (talk) 16:51, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
- Why do not you participate as a third party?--Anass (talk) 16:46, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
- Well, I just closed it as "No consensus", because I don't see one there. You want a merge, and Yoninah opposes it. Nobody else participated in the discussion. So, why did you request the discussion be closed? — Maile (talk) 16:34, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
- Yoninah tags removed. Anass if you wish to continue this discussion, please do it on one of the article talk pages. — Maile (talk) 16:57, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
- I have started a new discussion, but I want that a lot of users participate--Anass (talk) 17:02, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
- Yoninah tags removed. Anass if you wish to continue this discussion, please do it on one of the article talk pages. — Maile (talk) 16:57, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Anass: @Yoninah: If you want more participants in this discussion, it would be appropriate to invite others on the article's project talk page, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Israel. — Maile (talk) 17:17, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
ʻokina
Can you help move these articles? Thanks in advance. KAVEBEAR (talk) 14:25, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- Elizabeth Kekaaniau → Elizabeth Kekaʻaniau
- Ha'ula Beach → Haʻula Beach
- Maui No Ka 'Oi Magazine → Maui Nō Ka ʻOi Magazine
- Ho'olaule'a → Hoʻolauleʻa
- Kaula'ināiwi Island → Kaulaʻināiwi Island
- Ho'omaluhia Botanical Garden → Hoʻomaluhia Botanical Garden
- Na 'Aina Kai Botanical Gardens → Na ʻĀina Kai Botanical Gardens
- Makaokaha'i Point → Makaokahaʻi Point
- Ke'anae Arboretum → Keʻanae Arboretum
- Hi'iaka's Healing Herb Garden → Hiʻiaka's Healing Herb Garden
- Pala'au State Park → Palaʻau State Park
- Pua'a-2 Agricultural Fields Archeological District → Puaʻa-2 Agricultural Fields Archeological District
- Pu'u'oke'oke'o → Pu‘u‘oke‘oke‘o
- Pana'ewa Rainforest Zoo → Panaʻewa Rainforest Zoo
your mistake concerning non-existant username
Hi, you recently blocked an IP based on false information. We all have trouble with due diligence when things get co-complicated, so just a heads up.126.161.185.241 (talk) 14:24, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
- You don't say which one. But the instructions for appealing the block are on that IP's talk page. Please follow those instructions, and it will be reviewed by a different administrator. — Maile (talk) 15:50, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
missing Apsyw sock with same edits
Special:Contributions/Aizom = Special:Contributions/Apsyw
Same edits, same LTA. Let's BAN one as the other, locally & globally. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 191.252.134.240 (talk • contribs)
- I don't have the authority to do a global block or global ban (two different processes). Please post your request at WP:ANI. — Maile (talk) 17:13, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
- Pretty sure 191.252.134.24 is wikinger using a webhost (Locaweb, providing VPS/cloud hosting, domains, etc). Just FYI. -★- PlyrStar93 →Message me. ← 17:44, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
- Posted a copy of this message on Wikimedia for There'sNoTime, who, I believe, globally locked the Aizcom account. You may be correct about the webhost. My administrative tools are limited to English Wikipedia. — Maile (talk) 17:55, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
- And I thought I was bringing this to you as an enwiki local matter, where you could just put a local block on enwiki. It's alright though, I can submit a report on WP:WPOP if you are not specialized on proxies. -★- PlyrStar93 →Message me. ← 18:06, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
- PlyrStar93 Understood But the original request above was for a global ban. I don't have those tools. But since it's all tied in to the same account, it would probably be better handled by the same person who globally locked the original account. — Maile (talk) 18:11, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Revoke TPA
Please revoke talk page access for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:49.148.250.204. (see my revert) thanks JC7V7DC5768 (talk) 04:50, 19 July 2018 (UTC) Done — Maile (talk) 11:09, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Liliha’s family
Please read page 139 to 144 of the source I sent you. This is so interesting how my Wikipedia edits with User:W Nowicki made such an impact on this paper. Although it seems unfair of the author to alleged we tried to hide anything. I’m trying to find reliable sources to substantiate this family legend about Keanolani, the illegitimate daughter of Kamehameha V and Abigail Maheha. The quote from Cooke comparing Abigail Maheha to a dog and a sow especially sickens me. It is sad the more I dig into the lives of this family descended from Kuini Liliha. It seems Governess Liliha’s family was cursed from the get go. Her most famous husband Boki died at sea. She was an unsuccessful rival against Kaʻahumanu and Kīnaʻu and died with no political power. All three of her daughters led tragic lives either marred by unlucky marriages or sexual misconducts (according to Victorian sensibility that is) and her two sons were relatively obscure politicians during the monarchy. KAVEBEAR (talk) 05:34, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- KAVEBEAR I read this as more of a university thesis, where theories are presented. Is there a living descendant to Kamehameha somewhere in Hawaii? Would DNA bear that out? Would such a person hide in the shadows, or come forth to publicly claim Hawaiian rights to stolen lands? The author takes a leap of a conclusion - sidestepping WP standards on sources - "presumably Native Hawaiian Wikipedia authors whose vividly detailed but surprisingly little-known accounts of their ancestors’ experiences at the school have been edited out of the official Wikipedia articles" How would we know that anybody is who they claim to be on Wikipedia? Kind of an unintended smile at, "a kahuna (Hawaiian priest or expert) from Maui prophesied that all who entered the school would die." Surely, there is more to what the kahuna said. We all die in the end. Thanks for sharing. Wikipedia gets around. — Maile (talk) 15:56, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, true. I kind of get the point her point that the edits were removed because it solely based on oral traditions. But then again oral traditions are hard to prove. Are there living descendants of Kamehameha I? This is a question I have disputed with myself. DNA is not possible since testing on Hawaiian royal remains would all hell would break loose and we still have no clue where the king is buried. I originally thought no because the conventional history was that the Kamehamehas died with Pauahi and Albert Kunuiakea. Claimants like call this conventional narrative a myth. No one in the early territorial days seem to dispute this and no one claimed direct descent from Kamehameha I. The most prominent self-style royals individuals like Emma DeFries claimed collateral descent rather than direct descent. Even a few years ago Kahu Bill Maiʻoho (a man with connection to the recognized alii of the monarchy) once said all the descendants of Kamehameha are gone and was rebuked by another person for saying that. Studying the newspapers from Hawaii, this has all changed since at the least the 80s or 90s where more and more individuals claim Kamehameha descent. I forgot which article it was but a person talked about alii coming out of then woodworks to describe the phenomena. There are certainly a lot of claimed descendants today and a few of the lines that I have since discovered have semblance of validity like Kamehameha V’s illegitimate daughter, but most seems to be connected to obscure (in the sense they had no political role or were regarded as important during the monarchy) lines from Kamehameha I. It is a mess that I try to stay away from especially with modern pretenders. KAVEBEAR (talk) 00:18, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- Actually, I'm rather glad there will (probably) never be allowed DNA testing on the royal remains. Back in the 1980s, USA Pres. Zachary Taylor was exhumed, because there had always been rumors he was poisoned. I remember thinking how sad it was that an American president could not rest in his own grave. So, they tested after exhuming his body and said he was not poisoned. Not to be deterred, the conspiracy theorists say the tests were flawed. Imagine if this were allowed on Hawaii's royal family. There would be no end to the nonsense if it was allowed even once. The reality ... if such a descendant of Kam I could be proven to be alive ... So? ... other than talk shows, what purpose would it serve? — Maile (talk) 00:57, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
My apologizes...
If you could please re-add the comment on WP:AIV, it was deleted on accident because I rolled back due to an unconstructive report. Thank you. --IanDBeacon (talk) 19:27, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
- OK. I took care of it. Thanks for telling me. — Maile (talk) 19:34, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Could you disable this user's talkpage access? Thanks. 2601:1C0:4401:24A0:416E:3E4A:635D:411A (talk) 00:33, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Done — Maile (talk) 00:43, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Undelete
Can you restore my user space User:KAVEBEAR/Kepelino?KAVEBEAR (talk) 04:22, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Done — Maile (talk) 11:38, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- Well KAVEBEAR ... it looks like RHaworth deleted it again. He left a message that this should have gone through WP:REFUND. — Maile (talk) 11:58, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- Maile, after you had restored did it cross your mind that removing the speedy tag might be a good idea? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:10, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- KaveBear, I would be minded to delete it as abandoned draft or misuse of Wikipedia as a free host. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:10, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- RHaworth there is a discussion going on about this at WP:ANI. I have restored a version without the tag, per that discussion. The G7 was previously put there by the user. It's not an abandoned draft or web hosting, by the way. It's background material on an article improvement in progress. This editor is pretty active on creating and improving content on Asia-Pacific. — Maile (talk) 13:28, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clifford Braimah
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clifford Braimah. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 23:10, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
User:Poppenreport
Perhaps you might want to delete the edit summaries of User:Poppenreport on their talkpage, under WP:CRD 2? --Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 19:48, 29 July 2018 (UTC) (please mention me on reply; thanks!)
- OK. Thanks. — Maile (talk) 20:02, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
Kalakaua's 1874-75 visit to the United States
Would you be interested in creating a start article on Kalakaua's 1874-75 visit to the United States? I am working on Leleiohoku's article right now who served as Kalakaua's regent during his absence from Hawaii and thought it would be a good joint DYK nomination for November 17 (anniversary of the start the trip). Do you think there would be any importance in separating it from Reciprocity Treaty of 1875 and talking about the quirky details of his trip including his meeting with P. T. Barnum? KAVEBEAR (talk) 06:48, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
- Thinking about it. — Maile (talk) 12:35, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
- "To Facilitate the Negotiation of a Treaty or Treaties of Reciprocity Aug 1874". The Pacific Commercial Advertiser at Newspapers.com. October 17, 1874. p. 2. Retrieved July 30, 2018.
- "Hookupu for Kalakaua prior to his 1874 departure". The Pacific Commercial Advertiser at Newspapers.com. November 14, 1874. p. 3. Retrieved July 30, 2018.
- "A Nation's Royal Visitor". National Republican at Newspapers.com. December 14, 1874. Retrieved July 30, 2018.
"Eater" section of the Vox Media article
Hello, Maile66. You recently helped me by adding an image of Mark McKinnon to his article, so I wanted to see if you'd be willing to assist with another article, too. The Eater article was recently moved into the main space, so I drafted a new summary of article for Vox Media (the site's parent company) here. Another editor seemed fine with the proposed wording, but the section still has not been updated. Would you be able to review the proposed text, which is essentially a sourced version of the Eater introduction, and copy over the markup appropriately if the wording looks good? Thanks for your consideration. Inkian Jason (talk) 19:35, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
- Inkian Jason I don't normally do this COI editing. I find it visually confusing in the edit window. The citations, that is. My understanding is that you want the one paragraph section in Vox Media swapped with what you wrote. One editor objects to all the citations and says you only need 5. And they have suggested the 5. In the edit window (on my browser), it just looks like a mass of citations overwhelming the text. Difficult for me to differentiate. Below the last sentence, below the last editor who said they're too busy, please put in another version, the same text, but with only the 5 citations. That way, I would only have to copy and paste for you. — Maile (talk) 23:40, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks. I've shared another version of the proposed text with fewer inline citations at the bottom of this section. Inkian Jason (talk) 14:48, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
- Done — Maile (talk) 17:17, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for your assistance. Inkian Jason (talk) 17:38, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
- Done — Maile (talk) 17:17, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Move
Can you help me with these moves? I wonder if there is an easier way to do this like a desk for non-admins to propose these non-controversial blacklist moves. I peruse Category:Hawaii geography stubs to find these problematic titles.
- ✓Kea'iwa Heiau State Recreation Area → Keaʻiwa Heiau State Recreation Area
- ✓Pao'a Point → Paoʻa Point
- ✓Ulupa'U Crater → Ulupaʻu Crater
- Moloka'i Light → Molokai Light - ? KAVEBEAR What you proposing with this one? I see two blue links, both of which are old. — Maile (talk) 11:35, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
Side note, I came across a person named Alohikea who was involved in the Honolulu Courthouse riot. I wonder if he has any relation to Lizzie Alohikea.
KAVEBEAR (talk) 03:20, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
- Lizzie got her name from her husband, Kauai musician (Hawaiian Music Hall of Fame) and politician Alfred Alohikea. Don't know when he was born, or exact date of death. But he died sometime in the 1930s. I can't find an obit for him, or much in the way of news while he was a politician. Taylor, Clarice B. (March 17, 1960). "Tales of Hawaii: Alfred Alohikea and Hanohano Hanalei". Honolulu Star-Bulletin at Newspapers.com. p. 38. Retrieved July 27, 2018. — Maile (talk) 12:21, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
- KAVEBEAR - Interesting trivia. Alohikea was Drum Major for the Royal Hawaiian Band at Liliukalani's funeral. — Maile (talk) 18:52, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
- "Alfred Alohikea, Hawaiian Band, Liliuokalani's 1917 funeral". Honolulu Star-Bulletin Newspapers.com. November 19, 1917. Retrieved July 28, 2018.
- KAVEBEAR - Interesting trivia. Alohikea was Drum Major for the Royal Hawaiian Band at Liliukalani's funeral. — Maile (talk) 18:52, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
- In regards to your thoughts about a desk to handle these, I have only dealt with your requests and don't know enough about that process. I'm confident of your requests, because I know your background on Wikipedia. But as for a general desk to handle this stuff, I'm wondering if m:Spam blacklist/About is the place to ask about that. Seems to me that Meta-Wiki has a lot to do with this. — Maile (talk) 13:20, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
Moreno
This might interest you: https://muse.jhu.edu/book/59088. KAVEBEAR (talk) 16:25, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
- Oh, ho! Just scanned through a bit and didn't see Wikipedia credited. However, this book was probably being researched for years. I'll read when I get the chance. Celso Caesar Moreno is a classic case of the dual nature of man. He did stupid things, grandiose schemes. He financially bilked Kalakaua and and tried to sell the United States an island he didn't really own. And yet, he really seemed to care about the involuntary servitude forced upon Italian immigrants to the US, and tried to end the practice. I'm happy this book is out. Thanks. — Maile (talk) 16:43, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Narrative of Kalakaua
You should listen to this if you get the chance, http://www.wbur.org/endlessthread/2018/08/10/david-kalakaua . I wonder how much objective truth there is to the oppositional narrative (the predominant one in English language source material) created by his opponent. When writing these articles, I find it hard to balance the imperialist narrative from the 1800s and the modern indigenous scholarship which in general worships the Hawaiian monarchs and gloss over their faults or the complicated politics behind the kingdom. KAVEBEAR (talk) 08:12, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
- This is a concern (for any subject matter) higher up the review chain, especially at FA. I understand what you are saying, and it's a concern with many subjects as political correctness overtakes the public narrative. On both sides of any issue, any public hero, is an agenda from whoever is telling the story.
- Liliuokalani is a bit easier, since she was very vocal and gave her perspective. Much more has been written about her, I think. Kalakaua has been some surprises for me. I'm finding as I research the current article, that he personally felt a connection to the missionaries and whaling history of Hawaii. There was more to this man than the party animal darling of the sugar barons. There was a deep part of him that defied all expectations, and dug his heels in on Hawaiian culture. But, you know, human beings tend to reinvent their heroes and events into their own ideals. And then another generation comes along and says, "No ... that wasn't how it was ... " — Maile (talk) 13:39, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
- OK, I have now listened to the whole story you linked. I wonder if Reddit people read the world tour article, because the majority of this story sounds a lot like what we wrote. Or ... it could just be a coincidence. Just in case, it's motivation to complete this article on the reciprocity state visit. Like the people talking in that story, I am somewhat stunned by the lack of knowledge today's Hawaiians have of their own history, assuming that was accurate. Perhaps Hawaiians are more focused on the theft of their land than they are about the monarchy history. Ironic that James Haley contributed to this story, because he has also done much for Texas history. But the contrast between the two cultures, is that (IMO) Sam Houston left a very large boot print across Texas. He was a flawed, slave-owning man, who probably had more governmental and military sense than his contemporaries. I have always felt that Spanish/Mexican Texas was remade in the image of Sam Houston, and in many aspects remains so today. Well, let's give this article our best accuracy based on the sources. — Maile (talk) 20:12, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
Men of Hawaii (all volumes)
I thought this might interest you. It contains all the four volumes of Men of Hawaii and Men and Women of Hawaii: https://evols.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/handle/10524/56593 KAVEBEAR (talk) 02:59, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know about this. — Maile (talk) 01:25, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
Mary Pitman Ailau
Can you review Template:Did you know nominations/Mary Pitman Ailau? It has a lot of text that can't count as new since it is from her brother's article. KAVEBEAR (talk) 02:04, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
- KAVEBEAR how am I supposed to determine which is which? There is no Wikipedia tool that detects that, as far as I know. Normally, if the amount copied is significant, it should have a Template:Copied on the new article's talk page. Otherwise, there is no way to determine what is not copied. The Earwig tool is not reliable for this, because is says 92.3% chance of copyvio .— Maile (talk) 11:51, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
- Also, just as a handy tool that I use, you might want to load DYKcheck tool to your common.js - it will tell you how old an article is, date of expansion, etc. But it goes by date and does not distinguish if part of the new text was copied from another article. For instance, on Mary Pittman, it tells me:
- Prose size (text only): 9298 characters (1524 words) "readable prose size"
- Article created by KAVEBEAR on September 2, 2018
- Article moved from User:KAVEBEAR/Mary Pitman Ailau on September 3, 2018
- Assuming article is at 5x now, expansion began 114 edits ago on September 2, 2018
- However, it's a cool tool to have in your .js and shows in your left-had toolbox as "DYK check" — Maile (talk) 12:52, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
Here. I went ahead and remove the common text between article. KAVEBEAR (talk) 13:16, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
Images on Newspapers.com
Do you know how to extract the largest image from newspapers.com? I am speaking about this one. This is the largest I could get File:Liliuokalani in 1914 (The Advertiser).jpg but don't know if that is dimensionally the largest possible. KAVEBEAR (talk) 18:02, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
- I'm not that adept at images. I've only added non-free images, and pretty much uploaded them as they were in the original. Do you have some kind of tool on your computer that lets you adjust the size, so you could re-save it as anther name? — Maile (talk) 18:13, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Hawaii women in politics
Do you know if any women served in the Hawaii territorial legislature between Rosalie Keliʻinoi in 1925 and Elsie Hart Wilcox in 1932? They would have to have been representatives instead of senators since Wilcox was the first female senator. Likely there were none but just curious if there were any.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 04:22, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
- [6] possibly three more interesting women figure to look into: Dinah H. Naeole, Annie Woolsey-Harris and Mrs. George W. Wright (possibly May Martha Lycett).--KAVEBEAR (talk) 04:33, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
- I don't know yet. That Wilcox family had some interesting women in the 20th Century. And that includes Emma Kauikeolani Napoleon Mahelona Wilcox who married into the family. — Maile (talk) 11:29, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
- KAVEBEAR Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red is focusing on women lawyers. Possible drive in September. See List of first women lawyers and judges in Hawaii and "Hawaii Women Lawyers: Non-profit organization serving its members and the community". www.hawaiiwomenlawyers.org. There is also List of first women lawyers and judges in Australia and Oceania. — Maile (talk) 11:26, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Clarice Bromley Taylor
Have you read much about or by Clarice Bromley Taylor (1896-1963)?[7] She was a columnist for the Honolulu Star-Bulletin and wrote the weekly column “Tales About Hawaii” from the late 1940s to the early 1960s. I’ve cataloguing a lot to these columnists with clippings such as Emma Ahuena Taylor and her mother Mary Fayerweather Montano since they give a publish version of the oral traditions not mentioned in the written text. Taylor was not connected to the events of the monarchy like these women but seems to have collected stories from old kamaanina families. I slightly intimidate by Taylor’s enormous amount of work. Wish there was someone who had already done a full catalogue of her work. KAVEBEAR (talk) 06:05, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- I've never heard of either one of these two women. — Maile (talk) 16:35, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
Invitation
By the way, you should check out the portals newsletter. If you like it, consider joining up (Portals WikiProject members receive it on their talk page). — The Transhumanist 19:26, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Food
Hello! After the successful pilot program by Wikimedia India in 2015, Wiki Loves Food (WLF) is happening again in 2018 and this year, it's going International. To make this event a grand success, your direction is key. Please sign up here as a volunteer to bring all the world's food to Wikimedia. Danidamiobi (talk) 20:16, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Redact
You made a redaction to Glasgow High School (Kentucky) and The user just made another edit, I might have to rollback the current revision... Thegooduser Let's Chat 🍁 23:48, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
- That was his last edit, which was reverting his previous post. He is now blocked. No need for action on your part, but thanks for telling me. — Maile (talk) 23:51, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Elvis Presley
Re: Talk:Elvis Presley on film and television. Thanks for trying to help, but I still don’t get it. I’m sure the “non-musical” definition is sound (ie solid), and was determined 60 or 70 years ago. So why is a film with Elvis (of all people!) singing on-screen, not classed as a musical? I’m sure I’ve seen some “musicals” (in the 2000’s) with only 1 or 2 songs (... but I can’t recall them).
Any comment will be helpful.
And should I have asked this on Talk? (Is it relevant to the article?). MBG02 (talk) 13:27, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
- You might get answers from others on the article's talk page. But you might also ask at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film. — Maile (talk) 13:47, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Rescuing sources
How did you do this? Is it pretty easy?KAVEBEAR (talk) 23:04, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
- Easiest thing in the world. On any article, to go Page/History. Among the links above the revisions list is "Fix dead links". Click on it, and it takes you to "Analyze a page". It will probably tell you "Login Required". You'll see a smaller link (upper right on my skin" that says "Not logged in". Click on that, and it lets you log in. Allow permission to IABotManagementConsole. I always click the little check box that says "Add archives to all non-dead references (Optional)" Then click the button "Analyze". Then it does its magic. — Maile (talk) 23:14, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
- Do you have to change the dates manually yourself? From 2018-08-21 to August 21, 2018 for example. I noticed your edits have the latter format while my recent attempts have the computer generated dates.KAVEBEAR (talk) 02:05, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
- By now, you've probably figured it out. But, no, I didn't do manual date changes. The tool takes care of that. — Maile (talk) 11:05, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
- Do you have to change the dates manually yourself? From 2018-08-21 to August 21, 2018 for example. I noticed your edits have the latter format while my recent attempts have the computer generated dates.KAVEBEAR (talk) 02:05, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleting module subpages
Can you please delete these following module subpages which are dependent on a deleted module which I am unable to nominate for speedy deletion as it is giving an error:
Thanks. Pkbwcgs (talk) 11:21, 22 September 2018 (UTC)
Creation of article Hera Pheri 3
I request you to lift the ban from creating the article on Hera Pheri 3 as suitably appropriate content is now available with appropriate references for its creation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Helpful14 (talk • contribs) 4 October 2018 (UTC)
- Helpful14 Please list your request at WP:RFPP#Current requests for reduction in protection_level. This article has a lengthy history of recreation and re-deletion, and for that reason, I would prefer an uninvolved admin look at this request. Also, please sign your posts: WP:Signatures. Thank you. — Maile (talk) 11:17, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
You may wish to revoke talk page access.--Cahk (talk) 08:02, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks, done. — Maile (talk) 11:31, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Audie Murphy most viewed
Hi Maile. I wanted to make sure you caught this. Due to a recent Reddit article, Audie Murphy logged 240,000 views in one day (9-13)! For a while there, it was the most read page on WP. I know it has spiked before, but I don't remember it ever going this high. All hail social media! Roam41 (talk) 00:45, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- Holy cow! I'm copying this message over to WPMIL. — Maile (talk) 00:50, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Newspapers.com Access
Hello! I saw your message on Nikkimaria's talk page, sorry for the delay in processing your request. In the future feel free to leave me a message directly on my talk page or email me via email this user. My emails go straight to my phone so it is a guaranteed quick response, same with the talk page message I have an IRC bot that pings me when someone else has left me a message. Again sorry for the delay it is my last semester at my university so things have been kind of hectic. Thank you for your understanding. I've requested renewal of your account. Happy editing! --Cameron11598 (Talk) 18:39, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
- Cameron Thank you for your help. It's working now. — Maile (talk) 20:52, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Milhist coordinator election voting has commenced
G'day everyone, voting for the 2018 Wikiproject Military history coordinator tranche is now open. This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. Project members should vote for any candidates they support by 23:59 (UTC) on 28 September 2018. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 15 September 2018 (UTC) Note: the previous version omitted a link to the election page, therefore you are receiving this follow up message with a link to the election page to correct the previous version. We apologies for any inconvenience that this may have caused.
Have your say!
Hi everyone, just a quick reminder that voting for the WikiProject Military history coordinator election closes soon. You only have a day or so left to have your say about who should make up the coordination team for the next year. If you have already voted, thanks for participating! If you haven't and would like to, vote here before 23:59 UTC on 28 September. Thanks, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:29, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Darr H. Alkire
Maile,
Thanks for your quick review of Charles Irving Elliott. I have another request along the same lines. I have been working on the stub of Darr H. Alkire and feel it has come quite along way since I found it. Would you mind reviewing it to determine if it falls under the Wikiproject Hawaii? Also, do you think it is still a stub? Thanks for all you doKlausVonVilver (talk) 08:40, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
- KlausVonVilver It's fine. I added the Hawaii project banner, and changed all to Start class. Let me give you some advice. Whatever project you personally think your work is related to, feel free to add that project's banner on the talk page. That's what I do to mine, even way back when I was a beginning editor. Nobody ever objected. If you believe it's no longer a stub, then change it. The classes are only guidelines on how much work some editor thinks needs to be done. You're an editor, and you'd probably be able to judge it yourself. The exception might be the Military History project, once it gets past Start or C class. They have their own ratings scale, and they are the most active project that I know of. If you ever need guidance on any article that is related to their project, you are more likely to get a quicker answer from them. If you have not done so, I recommend joining that project, and/or signing up for their newsletter (see my copy in a section above). Good work on your part, and good luck. — Maile (talk) 18:27, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Thanks again for the review, and for the guidance on how this works. KlausVonVilver (talk) 19:13, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Audie Murphy honors and awards for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Audie Murphy honors and awards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Audie Murphy honors and awards until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Qwirkle (talk) 17:01, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
Queue 2
Can you link Rudolf Helm on the Barbara P. McCarthy hook at Template:Did you know/Queue/2? The guy is notable, but he only had a German Wikipedia article until I created the article here. SL93 (talk) 21:58, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
Done — Maile (talk) 22:00, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you. SL93 (talk) 22:01, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
87.254.67.90
Hi. You indef an IP, 87.254.67.90 (talk · contribs). As far as I know IPs shouldn't be indef (excepting proxies, maybe). © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 04:39, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
- The IP has been given the option to appeal the block. — Maile (talk) 12:14, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
- I know you are not new as an admin, and I'm not patronizing you, but the policy for blocking is quite clear: "IP addresses should rarely, if ever, be blocked indefinitely." and "Long-term blocks should never be used for isolated incidents, regardless of the nature of their policy violation." The blocked IP is dynamic and an indefinite block solves nothing. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 21:25, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
- I don't know what your interest is in this, and maybe it doesn't matter, but I've posted about it at WP:ANI. Please continue the conversation there. — Maile (talk) 21:36, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
Your map request
Kalākaua coinage TFA for 12/4/2018
Just letting you know. Hope you are doing well.--Wehwalt (talk) 20:28, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you! — Maile (talk) 20:39, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
Newspapers.com
Do you know who I contact for access questions on Newspapers.com? I've lost access to publisher extra and can't view newspapers past the 1920s. KAVEBEAR (talk) 22:26, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- Well, my last quest for renewal was Redux_pf_Newspapers.com. Are you checking for the Renewal like it's set up to work? But it never works smoothly for me (not last year, either), no matter which path you take. But I would say the three people to contact are Nikkimaria, Samwalton9 (WMF) and Cameron11598. Good luck. — Maile (talk) 23:15, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
- I still have access to the site. The Renewal link you sent shows that my account is still in the green. Just not Publisher Extra anymore. Do you have access to Publisher Extra? KAVEBEAR (talk) 02:23, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- I don't know what you consider Publisher Extra, but when my subscription ran out, it let me access certain things but not others. So, I would say the most direct route for you is to ping all three of the editors I listed above. My advice is to start a thread on one of their talk pages, and ping the other two so everybody gets involved in the same thread. — Maile (talk) 02:32, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Looks like Cameron11598 has just sent off the latest batch of applications, including your renewal request, so hopefully your access should be restored soon. Samwalton9 (WMF) (talk) 10:26, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- I don't know what you consider Publisher Extra, but when my subscription ran out, it let me access certain things but not others. So, I would say the most direct route for you is to ping all three of the editors I listed above. My advice is to start a thread on one of their talk pages, and ping the other two so everybody gets involved in the same thread. — Maile (talk) 02:32, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Woops!
Regarding this, sorry for the mix-up. I had noticed new activity from the sock farm that had been reverted by others, but the edit summaries had not used the usual pending changes syntax, so I failed to notice that protection is still in place--but I should have checked that directly, so that's egg on my face. I'll attend to the proxies in appropriate spaces for now and then renew the page protection discussion if (or, realistically, when) the socks renew their activity following expiration of the current protection. Candidly, I think there's an argument to be made for changing the protection to indefinite before it expires, since the disruption has been carried out like clockwork for ages and the sockmaster is so dogged about it that they are trying to leverage the content in even while protection is in place--but that said, I appreciate that this is an atypical way for RPP requests to be processed, so I'll adopt the standard wait and see approach. Anyway, I appreciate your quick response and advice. Snow let's rap 04:06, 7 December 2018 (UTC)
Nominations now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards
Nominations for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards are open until 23:59 (GMT) on 15 December 2018. Why don't you nominate the editors who you believe have made a real difference to the project in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
HJH 2018
New volume of Hawaii Journal of History is out. Includes one on Kalakaua and British press of 1881 visit. https://www.uhpress.hawaii.edu/title/hjh/ KAVEBEAR (talk) 02:58, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
- What a good article. I have added it as "Further reading" at the bottom of Kalākaua's 1881 world tour. Thank you. — Maile (talk) 12:58, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
About Crisco
Hey there! I think I’ve seen this guy around when coming across sysop pages. I’m in the dark about why he left and want to know why. Do you mind if you can tell me about it? VincentLUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 14:09, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
- I have absolutely no idea. I just read on his user page that he stopped. He was a valuable contributor to DYK. — Maile (talk) 14:21, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
- Man that’s a great loss ><. I felt him though... VincentLUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 14:53, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
Arbcom elections
These guides represent the thoughts of their authors. All individually written voter guides are eligible for inclusion. |
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Maile66. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Merry Merry
Happy Christmas! | ||
Hello Maile66, Early in A Child's Christmas in Wales the young Dylan and his friend Jim Prothero witness smoke pouring from Jim's home. After the conflagration has been extinguished Dylan writes that My thanks to you for your efforts to keep the 'pedia readable in case the firemen chose one of our articles :-) Best wishes to you and yours and happy editing in 2019. MarnetteD|Talk 02:16, 19 December 2018 (UTC) |
Voting now open for "Military historian of the year" and "Military history newcomer of the year" awards
Voting for our annual Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards is open until 23:59 (GMT) on 30 December 2018. Why don't you vote for the editors who you believe have made a real difference to Wikipedia's coverage of military history in 2018? MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:17, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
Five years! |
---|
Queue 6
The hook right after Heather Elvis also mentions the word "trial". Could you shuffle things around? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 00:41, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
Done — Maile (talk) 00:44, 18 December 2018 (UTC)
Cf. this, thanks for making this change. Daniel Case (talk) 02:31, 18 December 2018 (UTC)