User talk:Deb/Archive 19

Thanks Deb, im trying to get figured this out.. there is a not more info hence im trying to work on them the draft mode.. anymore help would be super appreciated.. blessings your way.. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mahmoodyaqub (talk • contribs) 20:14, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Igor Sabo author of Exwog page

Hi, Deb. Why you delete page about Exwog program? It is a real program and information about it is correct. I am an author of Exwog program and want to add it to list of reporting software. This program is free and very useful for people. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mathematicalman (talk • contribs) 12:59, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Peter Vollmer author page

Deb, why is this page being deleted? I am simply trying to add him as a South African author who has published 4 books. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tjc009 (talk • contribs) 12:21, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Nissan UConnect

Deb, I am trying to assemble information on all of the computer systems that are in all cars. I was hoping to get input from Wikipedians in this endeavor. I do not work for any car company. I am evaluating them all. In fact, I work for the Center for Distracted Driving at the University of Utah. Your deletion of this article undermines my efforts to assemble all of this data. Would it be better to assemble one article about ALL car systems? Why is it that there can be an article on the Toyota Prius, but not on the computer systems inside of the Toyota Prius? Is it not noteworthy?

Please advise. This information deserves to be on Wikipedia in some form. I need input from people who may own these cars and have used these systems to get the information correct. There is lots of this sort of information on Wikipedia, but it is incomplete and I am attempting to fill in the gaps. Other articles haven't been deleted only because they don't have the name of the company in the title, but fill exactly the same role. Kellycoinguy (talk) 19:53, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Also, is there any way to retrieve the text you deleted? Kellycoinguy (talk) 19:56, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Ah, I can see that at least part of my problem is that I used Kellycoinguy rather than my old user name KellyCoinGuy and gave the impression that I was a total newbie. Apologies, I hope to get a response at KellyCoinGuy. As an example of a similar article that HASN'T been deleted, there is MyFord Touch KellyCoinGuy (talk) 20:49, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

The Heinlein Society

Deb, I've been a Wikipedia editor since 2005. I've got barnstars. I was the coordinator of Intellipedia's Featured Article for over two years. I'm very familiar with notability guidelines. Please don't delete The Heinlein Society while I'm still working on it. Thanks for your advice about sandboxes and under construction flags. I'll use a sandbox. Now I wish you could send me the wikitext that I created. I've lost time due to this zealous deletion, but I will AGF. BonnyDoonBoy (talk) 16:12, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Undid recent contribution(s), but which ones?

Hi Deb, you just wrote a me a note stating that you had undone one or more of my recent contributions because they appeared to be promotional. I am surprised because I have not contributed anything since January, and this only after having gone back and forth with various editors to make sure that my entry was acceptable. I really felt that I had cut out everything that was not an objective fact and that could be backed up by the various objective sources that were cited. Unfortunately, you make no mention or give any kind of indication which entries or passages you "undid", so it is very difficult to get any kind of feel for the areas where you are passing judgement. 9 months after my last edit, I do not know exactly what my original wording was, or if the contributions that you undid were important enough to try to reword to your satisfaction. Is there any way you can give me a clue to what, specifically, you changed? Thanks. September 24, 2015 Cesanth (talk) 12:31, 24 September 2015 (UTC) --Cesanth (talk) 12:31, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Deleted Page - 2008_Visual_Collaborative_Miami_Exhibition_(Pop-up)

Hello Deb

With respect to the difficult jobs volunteer admins do, the reason behind the deletion was vague and far from constructive. This article was not spam. it was well sourced with sufficient references. We appreciate a review of it contents or a restore. We are confident no wiki policies were violated. thanks for your prompt attention on this. It does take time putting one together and can appreciate a mature dialogue with your suggestions or acknowledge on what perhaps is a delete mistake. Blessings. - Mnanonymous

No one has suggested it was spam. There were two references, neither of which was independent. Your use of "we" suggests that more than one person is contributing under your username. This is contrary to wikipedia policy. Deb (talk) 19:06, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

Deleted Page

Hi Deb,

You have recently deleted one of the article which i submitted for review. The reseaon is as "12:42, 4 December 2015 Deb (talk | contribs) deleted page Draft:Anup Tapadia (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement)"

Now i have re-write the content, how do i re-submit it for review. please do let me know.

Thanks, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rahulmmx (talk • contribs) 10:38, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi Deb,

I believe that the CoderDojo movement is of global significance and request that the page be unlocked so that people can recreate it. As a founder of the movement, which is a charity, I promise I will not edit the page or cause others to put content I control on there as I do understand the wikipedia rules and respect them deeply. I can say that thousands and thousands of people world wide are or have been involved and even a short search in Google will return you numerous independent media articles about CoderDojo. Your assistance in this matter would be appreciated I am sure that there will be enough people willing to contribute once the lock down is removed. My two sons who attend CoderDojo are also keen to contribute without my influence - Bill Liao Co-Founder CoderDojo.

I have no recollection of this article or of deleting or protecting it. However, at the moment it's reading like a blatant advert and needs to be cleaned up PDQ if you don't want it deleted (again?). Deb (talk) 08:30, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi Deb, Thank you for replying about the CoderDojo page, I can see you have to deal with a lot of issues and don't have much time. I have removed the Philosophy section from the page as this seems to be the most noticeable non-neutral content. I hope this change is sufficient from your perspective as a moderator, if not I hope you can find the time to post a short note here. The CoderDojo movement has parallels with Football clubs, and each of the some 600 'Dojos' can be very proud of their own brand and at times may be over-zealous in their use of non-neutral language, it may be necessary for us to deal with the many different clubs in a similar fashion to List of association football clubs. - Lindsay MacVean (sometime CoderDojo volunteer) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lindsaymacvean (talk • contribs) 05:21, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi Deb, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.51.72.140 (talk) 12:08, 11 July 2015 (UTC) You deleted my recent changes to the Mobify Wikipedia page. I would like to revise the article to ensure it follows the guidelines that you directed me to. What is the best way to go about this? Thanks, --Kmcyr (talk) 19:37, 16 June 2015 (UTC)Kmcyr June 16, 2015

Deltapath speedy deletion and related Sockpuppet investigation

Deltapath was recently recreated by another user. currently, a Sockpuppet investigation is open see here. if you are interested please check them. thank you :) Nicky mathew (talk) 11:15, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Vizhiyil

It was previously deleted per afd-the creator put the article back up in March right after it was AFD-oddly it never appeared on the talk page that it was before and oddly not caught till now. Wgolf (talk) 19:21, 21 June 2015 (UTC) Also looks like a SPI, there is also Michuroks01 Wgolf (talk) 19:27, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Deleted page - French Operations Research & Decision Support Society

I find it really rude that you deleted the French Operations Research society without any prior warning. The society is one of the largest Operations Research (OR) societies in Europe, and OR is a well established and recognized academic field. There have been some discussions going on about similar pages for other countries, that ended up being kept. So I don't understand the hurry in deleting this one. Please clarify (and read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/German_Operations_Research_Society first). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bfortz (talk • contribs) 20:00, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

How dumb are you guys when we post sum thing unless the sheep people believe it you delet it, HYETECH superchargers is a real company I was doing research on. Check then out or call them Hyetechsuperchargers.com so don't delete posters when thry are real, HYETECH is a leading manufacturer and the products they supply have never been done before by any other company so how can we write this so it's won't be deleted if it's the truth.

Deleted page - Lexinnova Technologies

Hi, you just deleted the page Lexinnova Technologies. I do not believe any of the content on the page was promotional. Also I believe it met the notability criteria. LexInnova and its insights have been published in several leading journals and several other notable sources.

Please let me know if there are any modifications that can be made to make sure that it meets all the criteria. Please not that several of our competitors are already listed on wikipedia with a similar number of sources.

I can provide additional sources if needed.

Request your cooperation in the matter. Thank you. Nasir at Lexinnova (talk) 14:08, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Can you add Andy Griffith to the Death Section for July 3? I can't remember how to do it, and would probably screw it up

SayRayJ — Preceding unsigned comment added by SayRayJ (talk • contribs) 14:12, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Just checked and he's already there! Deb (talk) 14:14, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi Deb,

You deleted my page ==LED wallpaper== three days ago. I wish to rework my article because it was not intended to be advertising. Please let me know what to do. Thank you.Viarasp (talk) 11:27, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

Deleted Pages

Hi Deb, You deleted my page ZTEsoft yesterday. I don't intend to make this page promotional.I can revise it to meet the criteria. What should I do? Thanks.

Hi. I tried to revise the Page-ZTEsoft just now, and I noticed there was an warning "this page is under protection". I just want to make sure that this page will not be blocked if I revise it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cher1991 (talk • contribs) 13:38, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

I want to create ZTEsoft page for people who need to know the basic information about it. I will modify the previous one and make sure that it meets all the criteria. Can you please unlock the page as it is really important for me. ThanksCher1991 (talk) 14:39, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

Unsigned post

Hi Deb, You deleted a page I was editing under the pretense that it was an advertisement, but from my perspective it's simply a means of informing the public about what the program is in action to do (help educate people who arent getting a full masters degree) and how this program affects the ever-changing business market. If that is an advertisement then wouldn't havard's page be an advertisement? As well as any band/musician page? They both tell the history of their topics, as I was doing on mine, as well as the affects they have on the ever-changing cultures they are associated with. I mentioned where it was started because that's the history of the program. I mentioned how the certificates are becoming more accepted so people can see how the educational system and business executive growth models are both changing and how this kind of program may become more and more prevalent, giving way to more optional learning that gives similar lessons to graduate degrees, but not be the entire program a master's or doctorate takes. If talking about that program is an advertisement, any business described on wiki would also fall under that same category, would it not? I'm not at all angry, or trying to be rude. I just have to be very honest about the way I perceive the post I was working hard on and how your labelling it as an advertisement should not be a double standard. If that program cannot get its information posted on wikipedia because it's a program that's specific to a school, or a certain demographic, none of the businesses, musicians, non-profits, etc... should have that right then. It just feels like a double standard and with all due respect, I disagree with it being deleted for the reason that it was. Id appreciate if you would respond with rebuttals to my points here, as I believe them to be legitimate points. If you disagree, i respect that and look forward to learning why, but wikipedia is an information hub that covers many specific topics, businesses included. The standard should be the same for all of those topics, no? Thank you for your time. Sorry for rambling. I do get passionate when I feel smaller parties are being censored for an unjust reason, but this is in no way personal and I mean you no disrespect as a person, so please take this as a friendly, spirited debate post.

Hi Dev,

I would like to improve my page based on your comments. You are requested to again put my page back so that i can work on the same.

Thanks, — Preceding unsigned comment added by President DEF (talk • contribs) 17:58, 16 July 2015 (UTC)

My RfA

Pavlov's RfA reward Thank for !voting at my recent RfA. You voted Support so you get a whopping three cookies, fresh from the oven! All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 18:49, 16 July 2015 (UTC).

(talk page stalker)Wasn't that ten years ago??? :o !!! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 10:32, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

July 4

I don't see anything on Talk:July 4 about a large-scale deletion of entries. Was that intentional, or are you talking about a different talk page? OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:40, 17 July 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 21 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Paolo Alboni page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:27, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

thanks fro rmvoing

take kity

Ca1ek (talk) 12:53, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Deleted Pages

Hi Deb, You deleted my page Nutty - A Network Utility yesterday. I don't intend to make this page promotional.I believe it is giving information about the existence of an application that many users of the Linux platform need. I read through the 'Neutral Points of View' and believe I have not mentioned anything which goes against the spirit of neutrality. It will be much appreciated if you can return the page and mention which part of the same went against the promotional/neutrality nature so that I can rectify the same. Thanks. Siddharthadas (talk) 17:24, 24 July 2015 (UTC)siddharthadas

Sorry, no. It's very clear that you have a conflict of interest here.Deb (talk) 17:32, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

Hi Deb, You deleted Facilitated Application Specification Techniques- FAST page citing COI and promotions. A page existed with completely false information on it and I corrected it because I am the one who coined the term. I simply wanted the history and references to be correct so I cited the article that I wrote in 1985 that coined that phrase. I'm not promoting myself nor my company. I don't want incorrect information posted, though, especially about something that I did. Please reconsider - let me know what needs to be removed to make it non-promotional. By the way, I have the trademark application from 1985.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Grush (talk • contribs) 16:17, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

User:OluwaCurtis

Hello Deb,

Could you please assess the above editor? I came across them few weeks ago and they seemed a brilliant contents creator. The user had created 68 articles within a space of two months of editing experience and I'm sure they will definitely create hundreds of Nigeria-related articles on notable topics. I thought of nominating them for Autopatrol to reduce the stress of patrolling their pages but I'm concern about their experience because they joined Wikipedia 2 month ago. What is your opinion on this? Thanks! Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 09:48, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 28 July

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Jennifer Caron Hall page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:30, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Page Protection

Hi Deb, could you please protect the Cyclo (film) page? Thanks. -KH-1 (talk) 10:17, 31 July 2015 (UTC)

Page re-instate?

Hi Deb,

I would like to re-instate this page, I have been following it for a while - If there is an issue with the content, please let me know. Appreciate your input -

Best wishes, Mills

Not enough information here for me to act on. Please read the FAQ at top of page and don't forget to sign your posts. Deb (talk) 10:05, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi Deb,

I've read through your message and no page currently exists so I think the bot may be confused.

Do let me know how I can re-instate - *Be the change you want to see* (talk) 10:22, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Equally baffling, sorry.Deb (talk) 10:23, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Sorry! I am trying to reinstate the Cablefree page which has just been picked by the bot and then deleted.

*Be the change you want to see* (talk) 10:39, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi Deb. I'm deleting what you've userfied. It's spam. -- Y not? 15:38, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Fine with me. It was only userfied on the understanding that it would be fixed. Deb (talk) 16:59, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Deleted DropTask Page

A page that we have recently published has been deleted under the pretense that it was an advertisement. This was not the intention as it was simply stating factual information about the software. I understand and respect the rules of wikipedia and therefore would like to request access to it so that I can make the appropriate changes please.Thinkproductivity (talk) 14:33, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the response Deb. After your first warning I consequently made edits to the page and wouldn't have saved and published had I known that it was still in breach of the Wikipedia rules. I understand the conflict of interest. Am I able to obtain a copy of the text that was deleted for other use (without any intent to publish here) please?Thinkproductivity (talk) 14:52, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

August 2015 - Edit warring / Richmond Pharmacology

Hi Deb, Jytdog, All - I apologize for the lack of communication, I have being trying to gain a clearer understanding of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I am the marketing manager for Richmond Pharmacology and our recent edits to the page created by JzG, were done in good faith. We felt the original content was intended to put the company in bad light following recent legal proceedings with the HRA. Our reasons for recent edits made are as follows:

1. The omission of academic research is unreasonable, as its factual and referenced. Therefore it is a removal of relevant and factual information presumably motivated by the malicious intent to smear the organisation.

2. The reference to Metro provided does not support that Richmond pays up to £2,000 therefore this a pure fabrication by the Wikipedia contributor. The article asks the question whether £2,000 are enough to be a guinea pig and Richmond Pharmacology is mentioned there.

3. The Dhaliwal case is misrepresented as the reference clearly states the borderline nature; a far cry from “won” which suggests that she was awarded damages. The case is irrelevant to the entry and not reflective of the organisation. It has presumably been added by JzG out of malicious intent to lower the reputation of the organisation and its officers.

All the text provided in our recent edits is factual and to the point and unlike previous editions are well referenced. We welcome new additions so long as they are balanced. We also welcome your recommendation on how to improve the content so that it is completely neutral and complies with your COI policy.

Please kindly advise how we can resolve this amicably.

Regards Swelgemoed (talk), 09:24, 7 August 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.36.106.121 (talk)

Paul Barlow

Did I read it right? Paul Barlow passed away? Bill the Cat 7 (talk) 20:17, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

The Mass Pike

The redirect you had previously deleted under CSD R3 was recreated by the same editor again. Imzadi 1979 → 23:31, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Resellpk Page

Hello Wikipedia Develper,

I create a Page and write article according to the government of Pakistan. The Wikipedia say after submit the page , your page is not meet according to the Wikipedia and it will be deleted in 7 Days. The Link is that https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resellpk

............................................................. We have described about the Best Company of Pakistan which provide hosting.Although we can improve this page day by day by owner.This Company is Chartered by Pakistan.So Please don't need to delete this page.We can write this page according to the Government. ................................................................................................................ Our Government IT Head Department also contact by a Phone for discussing some issues about that company.But Company owner Requested for approval for that page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Allurdututorial (talk • contribs) 21:33, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Resellpk Page

If you further say that , this page is not meet to our criteria so please send that what should to do for improving this page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resellpk — Preceding unsigned comment added by Allurdututorial (talk • contribs) 21:38, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

VLCC Health Care Ltd

Hi Deb,

Submitted it again, Hope this time i have n't used any promotional language and wherever there is a claim, it is addressed by a reference.If you still think,there exists the need of removing or editing any portion of article then let me know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swapnilc2 (talk • contribs) 06:24, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Panther Industries

WP:A7 states, "The criterion does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source.... If the claim's credibility is unclear, you can improve the article yourself, propose deletion, or list the article at articles for deletion."

I would be happy if you would please copy the deleted work to my user space while I wait for an email reply with the details. Tim AFS (talk) 20:53, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

"With 20 employees, I very much doubt you will be able to find independent references."

They have a write-up in the July 1, 2007 issue of Packaging Digest, which is behind a paywall (although there is a single paragraph web-only blurb at [1] which appears to have been published just prior to the detailed article) and their earlier work is described in this 2004 RFID Journal article. But it's their applicator robotics which I found interesting, and for which they have won several awards, the trophies for which I saw with my own eyes, and on which I wanted to write as soon as I get the details in email.

Would you please copy the deleted work into my userspace? Tim AFS (talk) 14:13, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

NEW BEACON SCHOOL

New Beacon School.

Deb, I would be interested to know if you have any connection with New Beacon School, paid or otherwise. I would like to be sure that all bias is transparent in this article in which the sexual abuse of a minor is mentioned. I would like an explanation as to why and how Wiki is being used to continue the cover up of this sexual abuse case. Having read Guy Hamilton's note about editing, I have now reviewed the edits and it appears that you are the source writer and that you have made alterations to factually correct and well referenced edits. Is it also the case that you have semi protected this site? I would like to understand why you have apparently taken this stance against a victim of child sexual abuse, in favour of the public relations of the school. I refer particularly to the used of the word "claims", as noted below.

The Controversy section refers to the alleged cover up of sexual abuse of a boy at the school. The site has now been semi protected. This

This section is biased in that it is stated that the Seveonaoks Chronicle "claims"....... The word "claims" should be replaced with the word reported. The Newspaper made no claims, merely reported the proven facts. The word "claims" is a piece of blatant spin used by the author to minimise public perception of the schools behaviour in response to the award of by Criminial Injuries Compensation Authority in respect of sexual abuse of one of its pupils.

The word claimed is also used in respect of the perpetrator having been previously suspended. Again, the newspaper made no claims. It reported the facts. The words claimed should be changed to the word reported.

In the first sentence, the same "spin" technique is is used....."....a former pupil who claimed...." The use of the word claim implies doubt. The school has written to the child saying that did not doubt his testimony, but is saying another thing publicly. The sentence should be changed to "....a former pupil disclosed".

The page should not be an advertisement and public relations platform for the New Beacon School. It should be open to editing. Otherwise Wiki is being used by the school to protect its reputation in the very serious matter of the sexual abuse of children.

Kindly explain why the article has been edited in a way which repeats the schools one sided and misleading comments made in the press (for which the school has apologised) and is potentially damaging to the victim. Johnobrienuk (talk) 10:38, 31 August 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnobrienuk (talk • contribs)

To edictor Johnobrienuk -- I doubt that editor Deb has any connection to the school, though they should answer on their own. Would you please discuss the content of the article at its Talk page? To editor Deb I have been contacted also. I see that you have semi-protected the page and have been involved in back-and-forth editing for some time, perhaps protecting the page in another way. But what I don't understand is why there is no discussion at the Talk page. There's no sifting of any evidence. No consideration of balance of coverage. My first edits at the page and its Talk page might be seen as being on the whitewashing side, because I am looking for sources. But offhand I must say there's merit in Johnobrienuk's pointing to apology made by the school as being significant, IMO. That was in the article and now is not, if I understand correctly. My impression is that Johnobrienuk is a relatively new editor and does not see any proper example of Talk page discussion. Just looking at the one article, if I were a new editor I would think the way to proceed is to lobby on the side and to believe that is how things get done here. To both of you, please discuss specific items of content at the Talk page for a while, I request of you. Then eventually we can get around to discussing refinements of general tone when there is a properly sourced article with some consensus built up from discussion, hopefully. sincerely, --doncram 08:13, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, doncram, I've responded on your talk page. Deb (talk) 12:00, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Jeffrey Ehrlich - Deleted page

Dear Deb,

I'm writing to ask for some minor assistance. You deleted my article about Jeffrey Ehrlich, because it did not comply with Wikipedia's NPOV rules. I'd really like to revise the article to bring it into compliance with Wikipedia's standards, but I don't have a copy of it.

Could you provide me one, please? Or even just point me in the right direction?

I'm serious about fixing my mistakes, and I appreciate whatever help you can give me. Thanks so much.

Sincerely, KirkTiberius KirkTiberius (talk) 03:25, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

• Were there some special reasons for a) userfying by copy&paste instead of restore&move and b) leaving the speedy tag in place? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:23, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Not "special reasons", no - but I wanted to see how long it would take him to start work on his sandbox and I can't see any reason to restore all those revisions for an article that may never see the light of day again. Deb (talk) 15:28, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I finished cleaning up the page to fix the POV issues and reposted it. Is it appropriate to remove the tag on it about it sounding like promotional material? Thanks so much for your help! KirkTiberius (talk) 04:16, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Page deletion: PayU_India (understanding your context)

Hi Deb, I appreciate your strong patrolling. I created this page, as a knowledge point. It'd be good to have you go through the page again and suggest what you see now as NOT aligned with the Encyclopedic content and context of Wikipedia.

The intent here is purely knowledge and value driven. I am personally against the abuse of any disciplined platform. Thanks! paritoshsharma (talk) 09:35, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

(talk page watcher)So you agree with User:Deb; who also prevents the abuse of a disciplined platform. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 09:41, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

I totally agree. But [Note to Deb]: I have gone through deeply on many other pages on Wikipedia which have purely promotional content as per "your guidelines". Since they have been existing, I had modeled this page accordingly, which was purely writted with a NPOV as Wiki says! paritoshsharma (talk) 10:34, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

I'm afraid it wasn't. But I've done some work to remove the promotional content. If you see any other examples of articles with promotional content, please tag them accordingly so we can work on improving them also. Deb (talk) 10:36, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for all the help Deb. I would really like to work with you to understand where exactly am I going wrong in building this page. I am 100% for maintaining the sanctity of Wikipedia, though existing pages from the payments industry are misleading. Some of them don't even have proper citations, but still exist, which is blatant advertising.

I appreciate your inputs to help me improve my first effort. This way I will be a solid contributor to Wikipedia henceforth. paritoshsharma (talk) 13:59, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

Talk page

Hi, talk page of deleted article Talk:Thomas Automatic Tech Limited. Created by user to contest deletion. --Human3015^TALK  14:40, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Notice of nomination of Torches to Triggers for deletion

A discussion is taking place at Afd as to whether the article Torches to Triggers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted. You are receiving this notice as a previous editor on the article. --Bejnar (talk) 16:31, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of Panilux

Hi Deb, You deleted a page I created last night "Panilux". Why does it match deletion criteria while https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plesk does not? What is the difference? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zeknoss (talk • contribs) 16:33, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of Michael Foley author page

Dear Deb, I understand from your deletion note that your issue is is based on your understanding that he wrote only one book. If I cite all his books in the article will that address your concern and make the article appropriate? Jenchristielondon (talk) 17:46, 10 September 2015 (UTC)User talk:Jenchristielondon

Category:Welsh-speaking royals

Hi Deb, I was curious to see you'd created Category:Welsh-speaking royals. Do either Charles or William actually speak good (or much) Welsh, or do they simply read pre-prepared translations etc.?? Sionk (talk) 15:46, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

The bunch of em ned to start speaking English first! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 15:50, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Yes, Charles spent a term at Aberystwyth University in order to learn Welsh, prior to his investiture, and both he and William have made speeches in Welsh. I'm not saying their Welsh is perfect but it's probably better than mine! Charles was previously in the "Welsh-speaking people" category - one of the many who got "disappeared" by the monoglots. Deb (talk) 21:29, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

And William?? As for Charles, no doubt the term studying Welsh history and language would have given him a reasonable awareness of the language, and something approaching correct pronounciation, but I doubt his 1969 speech was anything more than reading off a pre-prepared script. Ah well, I guess I've got bigger tastier fish to fry than nominating the category for deletion, but other people might raise an eyebrow. Sionk (talk) 18:26, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of Crosby Securities Limited page

Hi Deb, the previous page of Crosby Securities Limited has been deleted, and I've revised the article and want to send to you for further review. May I know how to submit it for your preview before I post it? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniellau1234 (talk • contribs) 07:37, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Help us improve wikimeets by filling in the UK Wikimeet survey!

Hello! I'm running a survey to identify the best way to notify Wikimedians about upcoming UK wikimeets (informal, in-person social meetings of Wikimedians), and to see if we can improve UK wikimeets to make them accessible and attractive to more editors and readers. All questions are optional, and it will take about 10 minutes to complete. Please fill it in at:

https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/JJMNVVD

Thanks! Mike Peel (talk) 19:28, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

The best of british luxury

Hi Deb

Please can you go to my talk page to look at my latest comments? Many thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by The best of British luxury (talk • contribs) 15:26, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

Curries Online Page Deletion??

Hi Deb, apologies if I have broken any guidelines of Wikipedia but I'm a new contributor so still finding my feet, so to speak... (I'm not even sure if this is the correct place to ask you a question?!?)

I was just after some clarification on why you deleted my article on Curriesonline.co.uk and Kukd.com merger and the history of the 2 companies?

If you could please let me know the reasons, I would be more than happy to re-write the article with the required specifications added and/or removed.

Many thanks,

--81.145.217.218 (talk) 13:38, 24 September 2015 (UTC)DaveGee85

Hi Deb, ok I will read the information you recommended.

In the meantime, is there a way for you to send me back my deleted content until such time as I "know what I'm doing" ? Thanks, DaveGee85 (talk) 15:02, 24 September 2015 (UTC)DaveGee85

Thanks https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Deb Can I also have the profile info about myself that Largoplazo referred to as my "resume". Thanks for your help

DaveGee85 (talk) 15:29, 24 September 2015 (UTC)DaveGee85

Your page move

I am not sure if your page move from Controversies of Fifty Shades of Grey to Critical response to Fifty Shades of Grey is appropriate, since the article is wholly negative. I split this from Fifty Shades of Grey since the section was WP:UNDUE compared to other parts of the article. Perhaps Criticism of Fifty Shades of Grey would be a more appropriate title? Also, would such a negative article in fact be inappropriate? Thanks! sst^flyer 10:32, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Years of demolition of buildings

Re the categories by year, I have added navigation templates to the series for "Buildings and Structures" and "Sports venues" eg Category:Buildings and structures demolished in 2010 and Category:Sports venues demolished in 2010 Hugo999 (talk) 10:42, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Gazprom International

Hi, Deb. Thank you keeping eye on that page. Maybe we should redirect that page to Gazprom per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gazprom EP International B.V. but in that case the redirect should probably be semi-protected. Beagel (talk) 17:59, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

What the heck! I did not brake the rules

This is about Da Bezd Chanl Page you delete! I DID NOT ATTACK THIS USER, I'm not trying to be mean or rude, I DID NOT MAKE FUN OF THIS USER IN ANY WAY, THIS WAS NOT A ATTACK ON HIM *Facepalm* TrunkstheSuperSaiyan (talk) 03:58, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

For the benefit of any third party who may be reading this, I'm unable to reproduce the wording of the attack page as it was offensive to the subject. You will just have to decide whether to believe me or the creator of the attack page. Deb (talk) 09:10, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Tricky, to know which of you to believe. Call me foolish but I think I might go with the one who has been here since 30 March 2002 and has 119290 edits. But it's only a thought. DBaK (talk) 15:05, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Autopatrolled

Hi , can u give me this user right Kurdistantolive (talk) 11:09, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

No, I can't. Deb (talk) 11:39, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

why ? Kurdistantolive (talk) 14:18, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

I don't know you well enough. Deb (talk) 14:21, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi Deb, Any chance there would be a less drastic way of interacting that you deleting entire pages? trying to stick to guidelines as much as possible and comply but it's bit tough if it keeps getting deleted.. Hope you can help, thank you

Gatdd (talk) 10:21, 15 October 2015 (UTC)gat

A cup of tea for you!

With this ever dramatic world including WikiDrama, here's a cup of tea to alleviate your day! This e-tea's remains have been e-composted SwisterTwister talk 07:17, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Deleted page

Hi Deb! ,due to G11 Unambiguous advertising or promotion rule from my article so I've read Wikipedia:NPOV guidance, but I still trust that my article didn't advertise because it just school information page. So now i moved article back to my sandbox User:Vchukkrit/sandbox please examine my article that which sections isn't neutral. —Preceding undated comment added 14:04, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Poe bio

Hi Deb,

You might have noticed that the Poe discussion is closed now that we have an agreement on using David Levy's lede. I have edited the Poe bio to include that lede. Please take a look when you get a chance. JoePeschel (talk) 18:43, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi

sorry I was going to do it myself but I wasn't sure how to move it there Saturn star (talk) 13:00, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

No probs. Deb (talk) 13:01, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi Deb

I was writing an article about Hexagol which is a brand new 6-sided hexagonal cage for training kids how to play football. It wasn't meant to be promotional, it's just a thing we invented a few years ago. Totally unique and I was just creating a page for it because it is a thing! It is there, kids do learn how to play football and other sports with Hexagol and why it isn't in Wikipedia is beyond me. I'm quite a new user though have loved wikipedia for years but I don't understand why Hexagol (brand new word and concept invented by me) can't be described on the site?

Kind regards, Robert Bobbycaw (talk) 13:46, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Nice cup of tea

Just appreciating you work!

MarkYabloko has asked you to join them for a nice cup of tea and sit down here.

MarkYabloko 16:29, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Deb reported by User:Dman41689 (Result: ). Thank you. Dman41689 (talk) 18:58, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 3 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the January 1955 page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

DiaGenic

Hi. Please review your deletion of DiaGenic. I looked through the history of the page and it had better versions than the last one. Anyway, A7 did not apply since there was a claim of importance in the article (Even referenced) and G11 does not apply when you can revert to a neutral version. Rettetast (talk) 20:57, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

I've looked at it again and I still agree with the nominator. Blatantly promotional and only one independent reference. But there is nothing to stop you or anyone else from recreating it, provided that you address the reasons for deletion. Deb (talk) 22:17, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Meh. You do not address the fact that it did not meet the criteria for 'speedy deletion. The first version of the article was not promotional at all and was created by a well respected editor with hundred of articles created. If you do not object I am going to undelete it. And please make sure you actually use the criteria at WP:CSD before using the tools you are trusted. Process is important. Rettetast (talk) 00:30, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

I disagree with your assessment. If I did not believe that the article fully met the criteria for speedy deletion, I would not have speedy deleted it. And kindly don't threaten me. Deb (talk) 10:56, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

emajaz.com

Hello Deb, Could you please review your deletion of emajaz.com? In your message you said that it looked promotional, -though I don't see that- or at least help me see what you're talking about, I've read all the policies regarding writing articles on Wiki, I've looked at other Wiki pages before I started writing, ones which are related to the e-commerce field like Amazon & Ebay, I just don't see what I'm doing wrong! Writing has been a passion of mine for more than 20 years now! I was so excited to start writing on Wiki, but now not so much! :( PLEASE HELP MEEE!!!

User:Ayat Al-Saied (talk) 15:39, 15 December 2015 (UTC)

Viking Life-Saving Equipment

Viking Life-Saving Equipment:

I don't tend to add frivolous articles. Many of the articles about non-English-speaking countries are quite unrepresented but important, as these types of things get 'passed over' by people (most people) who do not speak that language. Very few people speak Danish. The closest many people have come to conversing in a Scandinavian language is by listening to the Swedish Chef on The Muppets. Have you ever been to Scandinavia? Not many people have.

I have gathered that around 2,000 people work for this company - quite a lot for a firm that makes inflatable boats. It has sites all over the world, including a few in the UK, notably Aberdeen. Many North Sea oil rigs will have their equipment, for obvious reasons. I don't think many other firms do what it does. It's one of those industries, like Martin Baker ejection seats, where one firm has most of the business. I think you pulled the ejection handle too early. There may be competitors in the USA, but unlikely any in Europe. DinosaursLoveExistence (talk) 14:25, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Indeed I have been to Denmark, Sweden and Finland (Denmark and Sweden three times each) but I don't think that is the point. You described the company as "a world leader" and it seems you have no evidence for that other than the company's own promotional literature. It seems very difficult to find independent references for them. You are familiar with the policy on verifiability. I don't contest the company's notability but I will restore the article only in order to give you time to make the necessary improvements. Deb (talk) 14:46, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Tradeo article deletion

May i know on what grounds did you deleted that article having support links from main stream news channels and without even making me (author ) of the page about it ? what to do to restore the page ? Thanks Always :) (talk) 08:54, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

As explained in the warning on your Talk page. Deb (talk) 09:35, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi i have recreated the Tradeo article as per the guidelines and entirely other wordings. The news features include Reuters feauture and many other feature. Some other admin speeded it again. Please help Always :) (talk) 11:22, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Christmas Wishes

Christmas wishes Always :) (talk) 15:36, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	Thank you for contributing to the clean-up before, during, and after the sock farm of paid editing that was discovered at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Alwayssmileguys. I do not suspect this is last we've seen of this sock farm so thank you again for any future efforts as well. Mkdwtalk 03:28, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Deleted Page

Eh, I take back what I said on my Talk page. You're one of the wikipedia article nazis too. Going around deleting articles without any consideration to the time and effort the writer has put into it, or attempts to actually comply with Wikipedias ToS, Policies, and Guidelines. Instead of helping writers, with any attempt to improve Wikipedia, or making suggestions on where articles could be improved, you delete them, because quite frankly, you all have a power trip, and feel that your decision, is the only and right decision. Instead of actually trying to make an article that is relevant, on a subject that people care about, or a trend that is growing in a particular space... if it's something you aren't familiar with, just delete it. I could point you to 10 articles right now that seem to be promotional, or ambiguous --- why do they not get deleted? Because someone in the Wikipedia secret society approved it? I'm sorry, but it's wrong how you treat new writers, and it's one of the largest flaws of this site. Cthood (talk) 15:31, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Oh, you don't like that I actually took the trouble to tell you that I'd deleted your article and why? Okay, fine, carry on the way you are - you'll find you'll soon be blocked if you throw around insults like that. Deb (talk) 15:50, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

No, you deleted it without giving me the opportunity to solve the issue. I had no opportunity to respond to your why. The real shame in this "community" of legitimate "contributors" is that it's your way, or no way. Why there isn't a process by which to resolve issues before they are arbitrarily deleted is appalling. Cthood (talk) 16:32, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

You're quite correct. It's the way agreed by the Wikipedia community or no way. Deb (talk) 18:40, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

I was editing a page (Real time) and you deleted it

Why you did delete all my pages while I am still writing.

Please re-enable it.

Many thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jumppingjake (talk • contribs) 19:30, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

---

So what should I do to make that article open on wikipedia? You said it has not enough reference, and article posted is not meaningless. But I read things from here : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#A7

How can you tell whether it should be deleted?

Can you tell me what should I describe in the article?

I need your help!

Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jumppingjake (talk • contribs) 20:48, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello I went to WikiTeaHouse and followed 7 steps of the tutorials from WikiPedia Adventure. That took me 1 hours... I do really need to open the article posted before. It's valid and for real. How can you stop deleting my articles?

Conflict of Interest,Notability

Hello Deb.

I do not have a conflict of interest with Array BioPharma. I am a high school student and none of my relatives/parents work for Array Biopharma. May you point out where my bias was? Thanks PharmEditor (talk) 00:45, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

No problem, I'll categorize Array todayPharmEditor (talk) 14:19, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Also with Array BioPharma, I believe it is notable because as I said in the article, the company is in the NASDAQ Biotechnology Index.

--

With Regards,

Jake Anderson — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jumppingjake (talk • contribs) 21:31, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello Deb, are you still there?

Please help me!

Thanks in advance!

• You wrote: "It's valid and for real." Being "real" does not entitle any subject to a Wikipedia article. Deb (talk) 22:40, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

• It's just out there. It's just a brief description. Yet I read you posted conflicts of interests there. You misunderstood that... How can I let you understand?... Do we have other administrators for this?

Thank you, Deb! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jumppingjake (talk • contribs) 22:48, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Appreciate Your Response

Deb, thank you for helpful response after the speedy deletion of a page I was working on. Your response made perfect sense. My intention is not advertising or soapbox-ing, and I am fully aware and appreciative of Wikipedia's charter. Per your suggestion, I re-read the Welcome Page which notes that "Wikipedia is allowed to be imperfect," as we all are, and my imperfection this morning is that I did not fully understand that Wikipedia's verbatim advice to "Add the template Draft article, //Draft article//, at the top of the draft (not the talk page)" in order to create a draft was not 100% accurate. My intention is to edit what I had previously written to meet all of Wikipedia's guidelines and your review, as well. Towards that end, I would ask for a second chance. Since I am not sure who has the authority to provide second chances, I have separately asked User:3 of Diamonds, who flagged the entry for speedy deletion, to assist me by restoring the page into a proper draft mode with the caveat that he or she may review the final entry, and I request the same of you with a similar offer to judge, not in haste, but after I have completed the entry. Thank you again for your help on this, and I am sorry for the trouble. Happy new year to you, by the way! IntegrityPen (talk) 17:54, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, Deb. IntegrityPen (talk) 19:22, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Deb!

Happy New Year!

Deb,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:46, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Deleted page

Hi Deb, I'm trying to add a page for news presenter and reporter Warren Nettleford (who works for Channel 5 news in the UK, among other things) but it keeps being deleted before I can finish it. Can you tell me why? Rhiannondevon88

Deleted page - Food

Hi Deb, I'm trying to add a page with a description of a food made by very few local people. The reason of deletion appeared to be no reference for it, but there cannot be one since it's a food that is made on a special recipe which is not documented as far as I know. Should I abort putting this information here ?!?!?

(talk page watcher) Yes. Please see WP:NOT. Cheers. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi}

Chimsnero Goldsmith - request to discuss

Hope you are doing great, i will like to recreate a page you previously deleted chimsnero goldsmith is the name of the page. how can i do that please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Realonehqsource (talk • contribs) 13:04, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

You cannot recreate it as it is protected and only autoconfirmed users can create or edit it. Deb (talk) 14:03, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Note- WP:ADMINSHOP _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 14:06, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Deleted page: CometCall

Hi Deb, I understand that it is very important that Wikipedia contents are verified. As part of that scrutiny you have deleted my page CometCall (CometCall (A7: No credible indication of importance (individuals, animals, organizations, web content, events))). To be honest I believe this should not have been deleted. Cometcall is a free VoiP solution created by polish startup and is an example of enterpreneurial spirit of our country. Wikipedia has allowed solutions like Skype or GoToMeeting and other American solutions which are strictly commercial to have pages. I do not understand why CometCall does not deserve a page as well? Regards, Maggie — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maggie198303 (talk • contribs) 11:03, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Khalid Al-Saleh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Khalid Al-Saleh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Khalid Al-Saleh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chrisw80 (talk • contribs) 01:41, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

RE DOY

Thanks, @Deb, I guess I was a bit lazy in edit summarizing. Is "as per notability guidelines criteria for DOY (see [2])" any better?
Yours, Quis separabit? 13:25, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Not so much lazy as just didn't foresee the consequences. Deb (talk) 13:36, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

Siegfried Sassoon

You appeared to have deleted my addition 'It helps to read the passage from his book as well as his Declaration to see if this action was just due to depression or was part of his angry planned anti-war protest and his disgust about the significance of war medals. ″ Wandering along the sand dunes I felt outlawed, bitter and, baited. I wanted something to smash and trample on, and to a paroxysm of exasperation I performed the time-honoured gesture of shaking my clenched fists at the sky. Feeling no better for that, I ripped the M. C. ribbon off my tunic and threw it into the mouth of the Mersey. Weighted with significance though this action was, it would have felt more conclusive had the ribbon been heavier. As it was, the poor little thing fell weakly on to the water and floated away as though aware of its own futility. One of my point-to-point cups would have served my purpose more satisfyingly, and they’d meant much the same to me as my Military Cross.″ This is added to balance what I see as a subjective unsubstantiated comment in the previous sentence. Rather engage in a delete/ add contest please could you enligthen me why the addition was deleted 92.1.235.152 (talk) 11:47, 27 January 2016 (UTC)Rupert

See my response on your talk page. Deb (talk) 11:58, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Eplanet Private Limited

User:Eplanet Private Limited can't edit his talk page but the block notice says he should be able to. Just letting you know. Best, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 15:06, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of Fragments of Him page

Hi Deb,

You just deleted my page about Fragments of Him because there is no credible claim of significance. This game has been covered by some big websites like IGN, and I believe there are a lot of people trying to find information about the platforms this game is releasing on, and its release date.

What is the reason you think there is no claim of significance for this page?

Regards, Bas

Since you work for the company and are being paid to promote the product, and did not reference any independent sources in the article, I'm amazed you think you have anything to complain about. Deb (talk) 12:05, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

I see the problem there. If I add independent sources to the article, would you allow it, or is it mainly because of the fact that I work at the company that owns the product? Note that I am not posting this to promote it, but to inform people that have found the product on one of the many review websites that have covered the game, and are looking for more information.

If I were you, I would use Wikipedia:Articles for creation. Deb (talk) 12:43, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for supporting my RfA

	Hawkeye7 RfA Appreciation award
	Thank you for participating in and supporting my RfA, and for your kind words of support. It was very much appreciated. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:09, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Achimota Retail Centre

Thanks for your tag on the Achimota Retail Centre, however i wish to inform you that the article was still been worked on when the tag was put there. Also per the links in your tag you will find out that this article is quite notable and has no notability issues. Due to this i am undoing the notability tag. Thanks --Flixtey (talk) 12:35, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Please give me access to my draft.

Can I at least have access to my draft? It seems a bit ridiculous that you are just saying you cannot work on your own content in order to improve it so it can meet my standards.

Mossmoss75 (talk) 23:19, 2 February 2016 (UTC)mossmoss75

Who said that? Deb (talk) 12:03, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Rachel Gadsden

I have taken on board your comments about Rachel Gadsden I am putting up a revised version that hopefully meets the relevant standards.Colinetto (talk) 13:19, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Sorry about the confusion

I'm new to Wikipedia so I'm just learning the ropes of adding content. I was trying to create a page like Sid Lee, Publicis, Interbrand and JWT. Can you let me know how I can do that without the page being deleted?

wikiwriter26 (talk) 16:55, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Ligia Lieder for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ligia Lieder is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ligia Lieder until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mr. Guye (talk) 00:22, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for supporting my RfA

	Brianhe RfA Appreciation award
	Thank you for participating at my RfA. Your support was very much appreciated even if I did get a bit scorched. Brianhe (talk) 07:56, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

Bad Aibling rail accident

Would you be able to suggest a way we could reword the first line of the WP:LEAD to reduce the number of commas—they don't appear to be required for ambiguity reasons, and the sentence, with four commas, and parentheses, is bity and, quite hard, to read. —Sladen (talk) 17:57, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

hell deb

I think we need to some time to work on this article. Please don't delete. We will adjust and make corrections.

Thanks Wizardblunt (talk) 15:09, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

Deleting an article while it's still being created.

Hi there. While I appreciate you're trying to keep Wikipedia articles in accordance to the "rules", surely, you must know that a very large number of articles are here that don't meet the rules. I was trying to fill a gap with a publisher that has a separate children's imprint, that was founded as an independent company. I had barely gotten the framework in, and was staring to put in some details when you went and deleted it. I don't want to get into an edit war with you, but how do you get a new article started if you keep deleting them before they're complete?? While you're at it, why not delete every link in Template:Lagardère ... which is one of the blanks I was trying to fill?? Hi-storian (talk) 23:42, 13 February 2016 (UTC)

The new user who raised the above question (who has now christened me "The Wicked Witch of the West" on a third-party's talk page :-) ) claimed, on his user page, to be "a long-time Wikipedia user". I wrongly took this to mean that he had a certain level of experience and was familiar with the guidelines. I hadn't intended to delete the article until he reacted by swiftly reverting my redirect without addressing the issues in my edit summary (which read "redirect - no evidence of independent notability"). This looked and felt like a deliberately defiant act and I should have handled it differently - but it may serve as a good example to new users of how not to get what you want.Deb (talk) 12:47, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 14 February

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Fayard page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Young Montalbano (Young Montalbano)

Thank you for refining the Short Summary re Series 2, episode 6 "The Apricot." I have reviewed the TV broadcast, in the light of which I have slightly amended the edit. But I now feel that the Short Summary is no longer short! Do you agree? I also have doubts about including the events of the last few minutes of the episode, which could prove to be a spoiler for the reader! I don't intend to spend any more time on the summary, but if you feel that it would benefit from trimming or some précising, feel free! Regards --Observer6 (talk) 15:54, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, Deb, for your note/info about spoilers! Quite frankly, I'm not bothered either way! --- So that just leaves us with a short summary that is not, um, short? :-) All good wishes.--Observer6 (talk) 18:03, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for link re WP:Spoilers. --Observer6 (talk) 16:34, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Deb. You recently deleted my article and I was just wondering exactly which if the references used were not allowed as I am struggling to create an article which fits the wikipedia guidelines. Thanks Nleithsmith (talk) 16:20, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Category:Baroque draughtsmen has been nominated for discussion

Category:Baroque draughtsmen, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Sionk (talk) 11:52, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

Please restore Lisa Jevbratt

Kaitlyn415 is a new editor participating in the Wikipedia Edit-A-Thon at Carnegie Mellon University at this time. I am helping her with her editing of a new article and I would like you to please restore her draft so we can keep on working on it to meet guidelines. It would be so good not to discourage this new editor-she is doing her best at learning to write good articles. Good articles on Women Artists are greatly needed in the encyclopedia and you would be helping to make Wikipedia better by restoring her draft so that I can help her finish it It is so disheartening to work on an article and then have its draft deleted. Please look at my own editing history to assess my ability to help her with her draft.

The Very Best of Regards

Barbara (WVS) (talk) 21:14, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for responding on my talk page. The new editor has gone home. I am unable to 'instruct her' in the ways that you suggest. Would you be able to restore the article in my draft space?

Best Regards

Barbara (WVS) (talk) 23:19, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Heat (Scarlet Pleasure song)

Why do you keep deleting Heat (Scarlet Pleasure song)?? Seriously, why?

JonasJepsen (talk) 10:23, 5 March 2016 (CEST)

See this contributor's talk page to find out what really happened. Deb (talk) 11:40, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Singapore pinacotheque de paris

An article that you have been involved in editing—Singapore pinacotheque de paris —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. ► Bgpaulus (WORDS & DEEDS) ◄ 19:36, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Billboard Top 40 of 1980 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Billboard Top 40 of 1980 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Billboard Top 40 of 1980 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MPFitz1968 (talk) 18:27, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Also included are similar articles for 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985, 1986, 1987, 1988 and 1989, which are also listed in the AfD. MPFitz1968 (talk) 18:43, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Michelle Brownridge

You deleted this page today (A7, G11), and it was almost immediately recreated, without changes, by the original creator. It's been re-tagged but I thought if you were still around you might want to take action. ubiquity (talk) 22:27, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

808Viral

You deleted this page that someone nominated as spam/promotion. It is not spam or promotion this is a valid company, it is the first Native Advertising group in the state of Hawaii, same type of company as Buzzfeed and even has a Buzzfeed mentor. It is new company but with a notable name in the state of Hawaii. I provided the main company website as well as an example of a video because I realize people here may not be from Hawaii and would need to see examples. If that is the reason this was deleted I can redo this without linking to some of the content, but usually you guys want tons of references and sources. Please advise. Dani808 (talk) 06:44, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) Thank you for indicating the validity of the aforementioned deletion. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 09:34, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Dani808, I saw you removed your social media links "because someone tracked me down on twitter" and followed the twitter link to find out what they'd done. So, I have to ask, which "jerk on a power trip" did you have in mind when you tweeted? Me for nominating your advert, or Deb for deleting it? Bazj (talk) 14:26, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Classic caning! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 14:30, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Bazj, actually I was talking about Deb, talk page full of her deleting pages and kind of being a jerk about it. I didn't even notice you but if you feel left out you can be the busy body wikepedia jerk looking for drama. Seriously, what was the purpose of your comment? I asked a question to get useful help, not people bored and looking for internet drama. Did you just go to my twitter to look for something? Scrolled through all those tweets too. haha, Jesus. Dani808 (talk) 05:00, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

You're on the wrong page again, pet. Deb (talk) 07:27, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Deb, Again? When was I on the wrong page? I am responding to the comment directed to me here above. What page should I be on? Did you call me pet? Dani808 (talk) 02:31, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Yes, pet, you are on my talk page but you are addressing another user. Please go and use his talk page instead.Deb (talk) 13:00, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Pet Squad article

Hi Deb, I started to speedy the first posting of the Pet Squad article before I did a little digging, then I found out it IS a notable Canada/Malay/UK series, just unknown in the US. I put some notes on how to do the article right, including some links to support it, on Bayland's page to help him out, if he posts it again (I saw where he re-did it while I was making notes & you deleted it again) could you possibly move it to draft space instead of deleting it? Looks like he's just new & doesn't know how to do things yet. Thanks! JamesG5 (talk) 23:10, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Okay. The trouble was that it was impossible to tell what he was talking about, which makes me think he is going to need a Lot of help to get started.Deb (talk) 23:14, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, I saw that. Took me a minute to find it, I thought it was a hoax at first. I suggested he do it as a draft first & put it up for review, I just know sometimes with new editors they get discouraged & a nudge that way helps.  :) TY! JamesG5 (talk) 23:17, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Reversed a block

Hello. I've reversed your block of Briottie, as it doesn't technically fall afoul of the username policy: note that it is written in the form of Nicknamecompanyname, which is the sort of name explicitly permitted by WP:ISU. The user is also apparently willing to learn the core content policies, so should be given a second chance. Even if neither of the above were true, she also hasn't edited in five months, and UAA reports are considered stale after 2-3 weeks. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 17:06, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Wales Barnstar of National Merit
		For your outstanding work on Wikipedia, I bestow upon you this Wales Barnstar of National Merit. You (and Wales) should be very proud of the quality and quantity of work that you contributed to Wikipedia. This WikiAward was given to Deb by SethWhales talk 11:21, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) Promotional!!! G11 immediately!!! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 11:52, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Dim Sais yma. (Only joking.) Deb (talk) 11:54, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

You and Seth both deserve one!!♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:28, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

A reminder

I'm sure you've not forgotten but the WP:Awaken the Dragon contest starts in 4 and a half hours time. I wish you the best of luck!♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:20, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Google book ref tools

Thought this might be useful to you. It will draw up google book urls for you. Unfortunately doesn't work for inline citations though!♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:58, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Congrats on creating the 100th article!♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:02, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Look at the difference between [3]. I'm surprised that nobody has asked you to format the sources separating the title from publisher before, its one of the first things people will pick up on when you take an article for Good Article reviewing! Don't want to keep on at you and stall your efforts though. Can you at least try to do it? It's just I have stated in the rules that I expect the sources to be properly formatted. If you really think you're not going to change your style then I guess I'll have to accept it purely because overall content is more important than trivial things like formatting!♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:32, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Stub Obliteration

For this week I'm introducing a sort of game to blast away those stale old stubs with a prize at the end of it. See Wikipedia:WikiProject Wales/Awaken the Dragon/Stub Obliteration 2016. Expansion rules don't apply to any articles done through this, all you have to do is ensure every article you submit is minimum 1.5kb readable prose in total and adequately sourced and readable and remove the stub tag and update the project tag on the talk page. It could be that the article is 1.2kb readable prose and you simply add 0.3 kb prose and just quickly smarten up the sources and give a minor copyedit. The goal is reducing the number of stubs we have and making them more consistent, minimum start class entries. Read the top for the rules and more details and add your name to it in the style of the main entries page if you want to participate. It's open to contestants and anybody who is participating in the editathon independently. Potentially a lot of points can be earned from mass basic expansions with this!♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:16, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Citation / Schmitation

I hope I didn't upset you by re-citing the article St Catharine's Church, Baglan. I just wanted you to get the points. Yours FruitMonkey (talk) 23:53, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Welsh Women in Red Scientist Award

Welsh Women in Red Scientist YYY Award

Deb, Can I confer on you this award. At the moment there is a push for Welsh articles "Enter the Dragon", there is a push for "Women Scientists" and "Women in Red" is trying for "Women Writers". So many projects but you have discovered Megan Watts Hughes and she is Welsh Y, a Scientist Y and a Women in Red Writer Y. Brilliant. And she created this image (ish) Amazing. Victuallers (talk) 16:07, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	Thanks. Keep up the good work :-)! ♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:06, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

You can talk, I won't bite ;-) A few more citations on Caradoc of Llancarfan and you could claim some points.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:30, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Still looking for them... :-( Deb (talk) 08:48, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Trying to understand Wikipedia policy on articles about companies

Hi Deb,

Once I had created an article about a small company; one of those many articles that you are dutifully deleting :-). I am not arguing and not asking to restore it. I am just trying to understand Wikipedia principles on this. I have read the guidelines, and at first thought I got it (about promotion, self-promotion, notability etc.) But the more I think about it, the more I am confused about where the line is drawn.

When I personally encounter a new company on the Internet, I routinely turn to Wikipedia to get an overview. It is often better than trying to glean the info out of the company's own website. Right now, doing a research on my project I came across Macrofocus page, and this article reminded me the page I created that has been deleted. It is even marked as having notability problem too. So, why? As a user, I want to be able to find such info on Wiki. It is helpful.

I would appreciate if you could answer me.

Thanks, Alex -- talk 20:48, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Two months later:

Just today I found that you responded to my question the same day. Thanks, I appreciate it. It is too late to discuss any specifics, so I won't. (I have also just realized I have never got any notifications from Wikipedia. Oh my, my email notifications have not been turned on. Oops.)

Anyway, it was a pleasant surprize to find your response. Thanks again.

--Alex -- talk 23:29, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Anger management by mindfulness-based soles of feet technique

Hi Deb,
Just bringing this 'new' page to your attention as a result of this previous deletion. I don't think a change of title case infers greater 'encyclopediability', do you? ;-D Regards, 220 of ^Borg 12:56, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Wales in Red

Just in case you hadn't seen the notice, this starts tomorrow. The most prolific new article creators have the chance to earn a lot of points from this over the weekend!♦ Dr. Blofeld 07:15, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Undelete request

Hi Deb, do you mind if I undelete Lions Club Park Wyandotte MI and redirect the contents to Wyandotte, Michigan? Per this discussion, the article was created as a middle school project. It is certainly not notable on its own, but for the sake of preserving the research it might usefully become a couple of sentences in the overall article on the town. -- Euryalus (talk) 20:21, 16 April 2016 (UTC)

2016 CWHL Draft

Can you reinstate this? I hadn't finished! This was the start of the article on this year's CWHL draft; there are already articles on

• 2010 CWHL Draft
• 2011 CWHL Draft
• 2012 CWHL Draft
• 2013 CWHL Draft
• 2014 CWHL Draft
• 2015 CWHL Draft

and I had just updated Emerance Maschmeyer to include a reference to her entering for the draft in 2016, so now seemed like a good time to start the page for this year. Since the previous years' drafts have pages, this is clearly notable, and it wasn't going to stay that short for long (I was about to paste in the See Also section from 2015 CWHL Draft when I discovered it had been deleted).

Apologies for any formatting or terminology errors in this note, I haven't used Talk pages for this purpose before so I may be getting it wrong. Wwhyte (talk) 11:11, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

NuHome

You are horribly mean to a first time author. Who is your supervisor? No one should be treated as such.

I just want to show that this company exits as they just did work on my neighbor's home! I don't even work for the company. The only information I can find is on their website, thus, I wanted to add it to Wikipedia. Would you rather I just make up it? Should I just put that it was established in whatever year in Virginia? Should I apologize for adding what information is readily available? I think not. You are completely unhelpful and terribly rude.

I'm unsure as to why you are so unnecessarily hostile, but actual guidance would be appriciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mariahkoster (talk • contribs) 14:56, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

While I'm not Deb, I can add a few comments to this. Wikipedia has a specific set of guidelines that any subject, be it a person, a company, a song, etc. needs to meet to be included. This is the general notability guidelines. These guidelines lay out exactly what a subject needs to meet. For a company, such as NuHome, there's a more specific set of criteria here: WP:CORP. This page gives a better idea of what a company needs to meet to have an article. Mind you just EXISTING is not enough for an article. Wikipedia's not a site of discriminate information. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:00, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Deb, your response to Mariah's rant was perhaps a bit bitey. Admittedly, her rant here was definitely out of line, but I think a softer hand with new users might be a better approach than your admittedly snarky response. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:37, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Point taken. I find it almost inexplicable that so many people worldwide are using wikipedia every day but haven't the faintest idea of how it works or what its purpose is. Deb (talk) 18:13, 21 April 2016 (UTC)

Dispero Ras Siento (article)

Hello Deb my name is Natasha and i try to fix the "Dispero Ras Siento" page. I see you delete this page , is little dificault for me to fix it cause i dont know how the thing works, if is possible to tell me my wrongs and to fix it I would be grateful for you ....thank youu — Preceding unsigned comment added by Natasha Pap (talk • contribs) 13:52, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Rhuddlan Castle

Any chance you could source and improve it?♦ Dr. Blofeld 12:38, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Not really finished with Crickhowell yet, but I'll have a look later. Deb (talk) 16:21, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Can you add a source to end of 3rd and 4th paragraphs for Crickhowell Castle? Cheers.♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:18, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

The bridge deserves double points for effort but some of the other contestants might be playing for finishing above you so as much as I'd like to give you them I can't! If it means anything, thankyou Deb.♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:54, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Deleted page- MICS- media in conflict

Hi, you just deleted the page "MICS - The Media In conflict Seminar" I do not believe any of the content on the page was promotional. Also I believe it met the notability criteria. MICS and its action have been published in several journals. There are mainly written sources, but its possible to post them. Please not that the seminar works approval of the academic institution.

Please let me know if there are any modifications that can be made to make sure that it meets all the criteria.

I can provide additional sources if needed.

Thank you, Shalevbh (talk) 06:26, 26 April 2016 (UTC)shalev

It is fairly obvious from this question that you are not familiar with the wikipedia guidelines on notability, verifiability and neutral point of view. Feel free to come back when you have read these. Deb (talk) 09:39, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Crickhowell into Crickhowell Castle. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 01:45, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Sorry. I noted it in the edit summary for Crickhowell [4] but not in the new article. I mistakenly thought it had come from the castle article in the first place. Deb (talk) 11:04, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

User:Vmksoftwaresolutionspvtltd

You may wish to revoke talk page access as well.--Cahk (talk) 08:25, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

Emailed

Emailed.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:12, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

That's odd. It was just about arranging to send the Royal Wales book to Miyagawa. You'll need his address to send it to. Can you email him on it ? This seems to have got him interested in Welsh history so he might put it to good use!♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:33, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Contest award

		The Wales Barnstar of National Merit
		Congratulations on finishing 8th in the April 2016 Awaken the Dragon contest!! Thankyou for the hard work you've put in during this it is much appreciated! :-) ♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:16, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Those related to the organization in any way

"Avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products."

I'm not sure where this is from, or whether it is truly a universal principle. As long as articles are not promotional, those involved in an organization may be in the best position to describe its work for the encyclopedia, in non-promotional terms. Are you saying that no one belonging to the Catholic church may write articles related to the church? You'd need to eliminate most of the articles on the church in Wikipedia. I hope that we can accept that people within a large organization like the Jesuits (c. 16,000 members) can do a service to Wikipedia by writing objective, non-promotional, factual articles about the organizations's work. I'll look over the article on Regis and see where it's not simply factual, the sort of thing any outsider (like myself) can write by studying the Regis website. It does seem to me that the breadth and extent of Regis' service programs for students are beyond what most universities offer, and evidence an interest distinct from the university's purely academic and professional goals. Also, to include this article on the university's own wikipage would make that page unnecessarily long and cumbersome. Please clarify for me what the minimum requirements are here for submitting such pages to Wikipedia.Jzsj (talk) 12:04, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

I've already read this same paragraph on your talk page, and it doesn't help. You say "it seems to me that ...", acknowledging that this is your personal opinion. If you want to state it in an article as though it were a fact, then you need to produce evidence that it is true, and this evidence cannot come from the university's own website, which is designed to advertise the university to potential students. Deb (talk) 12:25, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

A page that feels like a copyright vio, but can't find it...

Rene Heger, something about this feels like its a copyright violation. Now there is one part that is word for word from the IMDB-but its just one part of it, not the entire article. Wgolf (talk) 19:59, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 9 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Paul Davies (politician) page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Instant Deletion of my page IBS Business School on advertising basis

Hi Deb

Thank you for your message

I am representing an University here and I am trying to edit my Heading as per our records. Apart from that, I am not trying to do any Advertisements.

I have created Wikipedia page with IBS Business School and it is deleted on the basis of advertising. I went through your page and still did not understand how my page was advertising as the information provided was completely informative.

If it is deleted because of reference link then for citation and verification I used that link and if it is violation then I am sorry. So kindly let me know how I do citation of the content without giving webpage reference if the information are from website. I went through NPOV also and it did not helped me much.

Here I am requesting you to undo deletion of "IBS Business School"

Hoping to hear from you soon.

Thanks, Wikipediaibs Wikipediaibs (talk) 11:51, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of Jinxerypokery 2

Hi Deb, you have delete the page Jonxerypokery 2. I can understand that the page may not meet certain criteria (though if you have time to help me a little it would be very much appreciated). Is it possible for me to go back and continue working on the page - in particular I do not want to lose the name.

Thanks Jinxerypokery Jinxerypokery — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:75EE:7100:6C25:7ADF:4479:C2D4 (talk) 11:00, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

Assuming you are the person who created the page logging in anonymously, you're blocked for creating promotional content. If you think I'm going to restore it, you clearly haven't understood the reason for its deletion or your blocking. Deb (talk) 13:27, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

IBS Business School Page Deletion Review

Hi Deb

Thanks for guideline.

I have a question. Is it ok to create IBS Business Page again following your guideline?

Thanks and Regards Wikipediaibs Wikipediaibs (talk) 06:10, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Creating a deleted page - IBS Business School

Hi Deb

I want to create page with title "IBS Business School" and I found out that this page is deleted once. May I create the page again with same Title but different content. Information will be from IBS Business School Website.

Thanks and Regards Khurram Ahmad Ahmadkhurram (talk) 07:07, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

No. You have to have independent references. See Wikipedia:Verifiability. Deb (talk) 09:06, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Hobbs Ltd

Hey Deb - thanks for the feedback on the Hobbs Ltd page I added. You've made yourself clear enough - I'll disclose any COI I have with the page, as soon as I figure out how to do it. I'm new here okay. Jackylovato (talk) 12:09, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Khan socks back.

User:Howard PF Cox is a sock of the Genghis Khan vandal. JumpiMaus (talk) 11:45, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Article Deletion - Thanks!

Thank you for deleting my unfinished article (Picture frames (movie), and linking it to my more finished one (Picture Frames (movie)). I haven't been on Wikipedia long, and I was having trouble figuring it out, and it's reassuring to know people are checking up on things like that. Thank you!

¬¬¬¬¬ Madeleine, May 27, 2016 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thegirlfromsubway (talk • contribs) 15:37, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

@Deb: No offence to anyone, but shouldn't it be moved to draft space? It makes my AfD finger twitchy, and I can't be the only one! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 16:04, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Both the titles she gives are incorrect, but it does say that it stars Jennifer Garner, so I allowed time for it to be tidied up. Deb (talk) 17:30, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

I had to look her up! Right; I tried to look up some sources, but its name only brings up tonnes of stuff on... you got it, picture framing. D'oh. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 17:35, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

————————————————————

DELETED ARTICLE — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mroomey (talk • contribs) 19:06, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello, You deleted my page "Hara Estroff Marano" for advertising but it was not intended, the article was also removed from my sandbox. It was unintended for my article to be promotional, it was just a school project because I am a high school student. I was wondering if there was anyway I could get it back to make improvements and to make sure it does not advertise anything, please let me know ASAP. Thank you, Mroomey (talk) 19:03, 27 May 2016 (UTC)mroomey

FYI

FYI. Quis separabit? 04:28, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

• Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 1990 in Namibia

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on 1990 in Namibia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GreenCricket (talk) 05:56, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Deletion request declined - context is clear. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:07, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

tcombs85

author of "Dr Warren Combs" page you deleted for A7 violation Deb, can you explain to me what sources I need to link to or provide to publish this page? I have 19 ISBN #'s, link to websites, etc... Thanks, Taylor Combs-tcombs85 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tcombs85 (talk • contribs) 12:58, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) Who is that, your father? It sounds, in any case, like you are too close to the subject and possibly have a conflict of interest in creating this article. The best thing for you to do is present a fat list of independent, third-party reliable sources that testify towards the subject's notabilty... and let someone else write the article in an objective and encyclopaedic fashion. Enjoy your cookies _Muffled ^Pocketed 13:08, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Here are a bunch of independent references including peer reviewed journal articles published by Dr Combs and others in which they reference Dr. Combs own peer reviewed work. Would this qualify as notability? The article text has been authored by a longtime peer in education, Stephanie Stewart, and she is not related to Dr. Combs. List of third party references: http://www.middleweb.com/8930/weak-ccss-connections/ - independent review of publication https://www.jstor.org/stable/40171026?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents - peer reviewed article published by Author in academic journal http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ225419 https://books.google.com/books?id=VT7YCz2G-iQC&pg=PA274&lpg=PA274&dq=the+effects+of+overt+and+covert+cues+on+written+syntax&source=bl&ots=R9cMTp9XhD&sig=hkMuYy2Y6ttLskh-a_17TF0IO3o&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjPm-r9wYnNAhUKOSYKHSDCDbAQ6AEIMjAD#v=onepage&q=the%20effects%20of%20overt%20and%20covert%20cues%20on%20written%20syntax&f=false - reference of Dr. Combs work in another Peer-reviewed academic journal Tcombs85 (talk) 14:16, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 2 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Michael Wood (historian) page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

About T.J. Storm

Hi Deb,
It appears that T.J. Storm, an article you deleted, has been recreated. It now has references, such as they are. Your thoughts about this?
Pete AU aka Shirt58

☺--Shirt58 (talk) 12:29, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

The Anglesey/Gwynedd Challenge

Planning on runnng this without prizes on June 13-20. If you're interested in contributing put your name down at the bottom of Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Wales/Awaken the Dragon. Thanks.♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:10, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

The Anglesey-Gwynedd Challenge

Just a reminder that this is now open!♦ Dr. Blofeld 07:31, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for creating the first article and getting it going and being encouraging towards running it! OK let's run with it!♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:52, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

FYI

have a looksee _Muffled ^Pocketed 12:10, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing my page

Hi Deb,

Thanks for helping to review the Circles.Life wiki page that I've just uploaded. Appreciate the comments, as my aim is to build the wiki page to be informative, while avoiding to sound too promotional. So it helps to have another set of eyes to review this.

I will continue to work on the content of the page. Looking forward to more comments from you. Cheers.

Kreen89 (talk) 11:11, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Deleted Page

Hello, You have just deleted the page ergoCentric Seating Systems. It was deleted, as far as I can tell because it was flagged as "advertising". However, looking at similar companies, my page was no where near as promotional, rather just facts about the history and patents awarded to the company - all of which have external links. If possible could you please explain how a company - that meet the Wikipedia requirements- keeps a page posted. Or highlight specifically what is wrong with the current post. Thank you for your time. - Pandab — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pendab (talk • contribs) 14:52, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Confilct of interest - Thyssen Bornemisza Art Contemporary

ad 3) As said I tried with their own description of the foundation, its got it that you found that advetorial, I changed that already.

ad 1) No-one is actually paying me for the edits, or any of this, but then lets make me identify myselft in the article, would that be ok? Just to state the fact this is untrue then.

ad 2) I have now added a couple of sources, how many would I need to prove the notabilty if this is also not enough?

Or you just in general will not allow me to publish this? Cause then I ll give up and voilá one article less.

Also: I think it is very interesting that you DO take the time to research a lot of things here, EXCEPT the one that is in question. If you would maybe google the foundation itself, you might just like to create the page yourself. You would find notability I am sure. Iszilagyi (talk) 15:33, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Deleting all my comments has just made your statements look silly. Deb (talk) 20:20, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

AN/I

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Here, just FYI. Nothing to see. _Muffled ^Pocketed 14:51, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

TraceParts needs more protection!

It was recreated about two minutes after you protect it. Largoplazo (talk) 17:43, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Deleted: El Cid Familiaran

Read the first line of your talk page and immediately understood why you deleted it. My article is only partial and unfinished, I have more to add. How do I coordinate with you to recreate that page once a full article is up? Vice Mayor El Cid Familiaran is a notable figure locally with advocacies that landed him the Vice Mayorship and an acting Mayorship role in the past, so he qualifies for notability, if that is the issue. RepublicaNegrense (talk) 02:27, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Md P Nazim

Indian business related biographical article about Md P Nazim why did you deletedBteifanai (talk) 12:27, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

The West Country Challenge

Hi. I was wondering if you'd be interested in participating in Wikipedia:WikiProject England/The West Country Challenge in August. A chance to win £250 as well! If contests aren't your thing we welcome independent contributors too. If interested sign up at participants. Cheers!♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:53, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Danmell Ndonye

Is there anything worth userfying there? Valoem ^{talk contrib} 21:26, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

I don't think so. Deb (talk) 21:28, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Okay, I'll just keep the redirect then. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 21:35, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) Well, until we nuke the article. It's really poor. _Muffled ^Pocketed 21:38, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi I assume your joking what is wrong with the article. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 21:47, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

WP:PERSISTENCE...? _Muffled ^Pocketed 22:18, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Source from 2011. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 22:49, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

A deletion article

Hey Deb, can I know whats the reason to delete my article that i created few minutes ago? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beingstop (talk • contribs) 19:52, 24 July 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Hello Deb. Noticed you moved the MelissaIfidzhen page to Melissa Fidzhen. Thank you as I was hoping to do same except its IFIDZHEN. If you could help with that. It will be great Yours, new and trying to get a hang news. My name is Debola Debola Adebanjo (talk) 11:01, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for your response, it's made me so happy, can you create an article about a Spanish big business company which is servicing to 13 countries. Or i will create that! if i create then what i need to do to protect from deletion? pls help! Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beingstop (talk • contribs) 08:51, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

A deletion article

Hey Deb, Can you clarify me how come Ayushman DS Joshi not meet the significance of being in wikipedia ?.If you were to delete the page , you should inform us first ! ..Could you please let me acess the draft atleast? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SH1998N (talk • contribs) 06:35, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

FYI

Under construction. _Muffled ^Pocketed 13:28, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

From UP

Hello You removed a page I have created. And I don't even have an access to the draft of what I wrote.

1. It wasn't an advertisement. It was about a non-profit non-governmental educational organization and I had the right to put it on WIKI. 2. There are many articles about big companies such as Pepsi, facebook, Coca-Cola and so on. These pages are advertising the big companies. Why don't you delete them all? And you easily perform a deletion of a page about an educational institute.

I ask you kindly to recover the page.

Here is what you deleted: 13:30, 4 August 2016 Deb (talk | contribs) deleted page Online Islamic Studies (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goharemehr (talk • contribs)

A kitten for you!

Hai Dep, thanks for pointing out my contribution issues, i check as you said and do it as per guidelines. Thanks

Bibinmohan (talk) 03:44, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Anup Tapadia Wiki Page.

Hello Deb. I would like to create a wiki page for Anup Tapadia as part of my college project. I am aware that a previously created page was deleted by you for infringing on rule G:11 for Unambiguous advertising or promotion. I am completely unaware about the contents of the previous page and I would like to state that this would be my first attempt to create a page on wikipedia. I will be sure to create my page from a completely neutral standpoint keeping all the wikipedia guidelines in mind.

Rohanpashankar (talk) 08:35, 8 August 2016 (UTC) Rohan Pashankar

The West Country Challenge

This is just a reminder that Wikipedia:WikiProject England/The West Country Challenge kicks off today, with the first subject being Bristol. Please remember to post entries under your name at Wikipedia:WikiProject England/The West Country Challenge/Bristol. You are receiving this message because you are listed as a participant in the challenge.

Happy editing! --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:46, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

The first leg is Bristol. Names are to be added at the bottom of the Bristol page and articles listed. Please also make sure that you add entries you improve/start to the main list on the main page. There will be £10 to win each day for the most points accumulated and then the winner of the county crowned after three days. The overall winner will be decided from the points accumulated from each county round. If you're not interested in winning anything and want to contribute anything you want from the West Country this is fine too though. Best of luck!♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:08, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

Hi Deb I'm super impressed with how on it you are in terms of the Wikipedia edits. It took you 10 mins to see my page which is great. Just to let you know I don't have any COI with that company whatsover - I live in Bristol and am trying to get more bristol businesses listed on Wikipedia as our city has surged in growth over the last few years to start to rival London as a tech hub and I think it's important that all our entrepreneurs are recognised. I have similar plans to start up pages for local bristol businesses and as this one was founded in 1986 and employs 90 people I thought it would pass the noteworthy test. Please let me know if it's just impossible to put up company pages and I will regretfully have to shelve my project. Kind regards Rob Journopro (talk) 12:02, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

HDL (company)

Hi Deb, You deleted the HDL page that i put up only yesterday! Why? :( I followed the rules, well at least in my mid i did. I was going to start to list a range of Chinese companies on Wikipedia, to try and balance out the over representation of European and North American businesses. The HDL page was my first foray. I looked at the equivalent Wikipedia pages from different companies who are less well known, so i could judge what was acceptable.

My article was impartial, notable, and well researched. More than some of the western automation company pages I have seen! Added to that how is it fair that a western company can have a Wikipedia page, but a Chinese company cannot? This smacks of racism.

I then posted the below content on the HDL talk page- (I received no reply, and the HDL page was deleted shortly afterwards.)

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because.. The CSD G11 rules which you have charged against the HDL automation page state:

"This applies to pages that are exclusively promotional and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION. If a subject is notable and the content could plausibly be replaced with text that complies with neutral point of view, this is preferable to deletion. Note: Any article that describes its subject from a neutral point of view does not qualify for this criterion. However, "promotion" does not necessarily mean commercial promotion: anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc."

From this I will draw the points which prove the page is not applicable for deletion.

Notabiltiy

• The company known as HDL developed their own networking protocol to create both the Buspro, and Buspro wireless systems. These systems are unique making them deserving of the notable title.
• The company is the largest of its type in Asia, and has installed automation products in the 'The great hall of the people' in China, the Sydney Opera house, palaces in Dubai, and a range of international airports. This makes HDL notable in the field of automation.
• The company was the first home grown Chinese automation manufacturer. This makes it notable.

Neutral point of view

A neutral point of view was maintained throughout the article. If you can find any text which is not written in a neutral point of view, I urge you to change it.

Promotion

The article does not promote, or push, any particular view point or idea. It simply states the facts. If I was to list a celebrity’s age and their past movie roles on Wikipedia, would I be guilty of promoting the celebrity?

Precedent

In addition to this a precedent has already been set for the inclusion of smaller, less notable, automation manufactures into Wikipedia. For your reference:

• control4
• insteon
• leviton
• e-Home Automation
• sonos

---And countless others.

What is interesting about this is that these companies did not develop their own technology, they have not had their products installed in any world renowned locations, and they were not the first to do anything. Half of the automation companies on Wikipedia are not even as large as HDL!

It is clear that you marked the page for speedy deletion due to some misplaced form cultural imperialism. Simply because you do not know of HDL, does not warrant the page for deletion.

Included in the page were links to some of the leading building management websites in China which clearly show that HDL is notable, as for the past 10 years they have consistently placed as one of the top automation manufactures in Asia. I realize that a lot of junk gets posted on Wikipedia, and it’s up to people like you to keep the site running and sort the wheat from the chaff.

All I ask is that companies in the same industry are treated equally. Just because one is located in one country and another in a different country does not mean that different rules can be applied.

I worked hard on this page, it may not be perfect, but I gave it my best shot. In the future I will be creating more pages on Chinese companies as I am passionate about showing that my country is not just full of rice paddies and tea farmers.

If you could give me some help it would be gratefully appreciated.

Yours sincerely, WanZai

HDL (Automation company) deleted :(-- Back from the dead? --

Dearest Deb,
After my entry was deleted, cold bloodily cut down in its youth if you will, I put some hard graft in and added what felt like thousands of references and citations.
Some are in English, some are in Chinese, but they are there. The tone is neutral, linguistically matching the content on other 'automation' Wikipedia pages. If anyone accuses it of being promotional there is a good chance I will hang myself.
I don’t want to boast put I am 99% sure I have created the world’s best Wikipedia entry. There is no need to thank me however, seeing my article among the countless others will be thanks enough.
Would it be possible if you could visit my Userpage, and pass your expert eyes over my Wikipedia entry? A thousand thankyous if you can.
Your humble servant,
Wanzai888 Wanzai888 (talk) 08:09, 11 August 2016 (UTC)