Open main menu

Wikipedia logo red.png

Contents

Joseph Heller, issue resolvedEdit

Hello, 220 of Borg. You have new messages at I.am.a.qwerty's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Malliya Rechana, KavijanasrayamEdit

Thank you, I am sorry you have been easily mistakened, I am in the learning phase and improving my articles. The points that you wrote are more valid in describing Abrahmad111 than me. I will keep honoring what you said but invite you to read and research Abrahmad111 as well, and post the same message on his talk page as you have posted on mine. SubhashiniIyer (talk)

Hi, you have put a whole set of wiki help for me on my talk page, so I ask you for help. I have a question. Abrahmad111 is constantly fooling and undoing and removing much older and antique (The Indian Antiquary) research references in order to attribute a poet to his region rather than sticking to the history. I have kept his references (which are mostly a thesis and individual writings unlike The Indian Antiquary) and only removed his unreferenced personal theories but he has been removing all my referenced info to put forth only his theories. Now he removed my content and writes one has to stick to the old style. This fellow creates duplicate pages and vandalizes pages to put forth his theories. He is not able to bear if I keep the theories in chronological order and removes the old theories which do not attribute the work or the poet to his homeplace. Unlike him I am trying to keep both theories but he keeps the newer theories and adds his personal theories as well. What do you advise? I am going to wait for your advise. Thanks SubhashiniIyer (talk) 11:54, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

Request for administratorEdit

I think the edit summary here should be rev-deleted, or whatever it is called, that you can do to remove it from public sight.
Regards, 220 of Borg 05:18, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Done. Alex ShihTalk 07:41, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter messageEdit

 Hello, 220 of Borg. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

MOS:FLAGICONEdit

Hi. Regarding this edit, I actually removed flag icons from hundreds of India settlement articles, until someone pointed out to me the sentence Human geographic articles – for example settlements and administrative subdivisions – may have flags of the country and first-level administrative subdivision in infoboxes in this same policy. I had to revert myself a few hundred times. What do you think? --Muhandes (talk) 08:56, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Lindsay Shepherd listed at Redirects for discussionEdit

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Lindsay Shepherd. Since you had some involvement with the Lindsay Shepherd redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ElKevbo (talk) 12:09, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

When is a conviction recorded - on verdict or on sentencing?Edit

Thanks for your edits to the Murder of Michael McGurk, in particular this edit that removed the comments that a conviction against Ron Medich is currently pending. A jury has found Medich guilty of ordering the murder of McGurk and guilty of intimidating McGurk's wife. However, at the time of writing, no conviction has been recorded for either charge. Conviction (or the Judge's decision to not record a conviction (unlikely)) is not made by the outcome of a jury verdict. The judge receives submissions from the prosecution and defence and then makes a decision. While it is highly likely that a conviction will be recorded against Medich and he will be sentenced accordingly, it is inappropriate to record a conviction at this point in time. Rangasyd (talk) 08:59, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Point taken. Sorry for the slow response. My WP editing has been woefully low recently as I haven't had internet at home for over a year, plus other factors.  
I hope to return to more WP activity in the future. 220 of Borg 01:04, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter messageEdit

 Hello, 220 of Borg. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter messageEdit

 Hello, 220 of Borg. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Stale userspace draftEdit

Hi, I'm CoolSkittle. I noticed you created a userspace draft some time ago at User:220 of Borg/Engelandvaarder, which seems to be abandoned. Do you plan to develop this? CoolSkittle (talk) 19:50, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello @CoolSkittle: Apologies for slow response, my WP editing has been distressingly infrequent the last year or so.  
That page is IIRC a Google translation of a page from the Dutch Wikipedia. I don't think I am interested in working on it further. If you think it's worthy of 'publishing' and wish to bring it up to scratch first feel free to do so, or
If you think it should be deleted it's OK with me.
 - I have just seen that there is already the shorter Engelandvaarder page on En-WP! I can't remember but that is probably why I didn't continue working on 'my' draft.
Regards, 220 of Borg 04:57, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
I have redirected your draft to Engelandvaarder per WP:WikiProject Abandoned Drafts#Stale userspace drafts. CoolSkittle (talk) 20:37, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
Return to the user page of "220 of Borg".