Aaron's The Best

Welcome

Hello, Aaron's The Best, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! --Animalparty! (talk) 21:02, 27 September 2016 (UTC) Getting started Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Help directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

September 2016

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Cola Song, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 21:36, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. I wasn't supposed to add that onto the page, but it fits as an genre for that song! Aaron's The Best (talk) 22:12, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

"Foxtel On" services

I noticed you recently created the article Foxtel On, however the article has no in-line citations. All articles on Wikipedia must be referenced with reliable sources. Your article is at risk of being deleted based on the lack of citations, so please find and cite references as soon as possible. -- Whats new?^(talk) 00:11, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

I found a few refs to put on the page.Aaron's The Best (talk) 00:20, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

That's great. Just remember, everything needs to be sourced into the future. -- Whats new?^(talk) 00:29, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (Pepsi P1) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Pepsi P1, Aaron's The Best!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I've added two citations and a proper references list so this article is verified.

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

October 2016

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give IPad 2 a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 22:56, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Please provide references

Hi. Thank you for your edit to SBS 2 that provided a specific date for the channel's rebrand to SBS Viceland. However, as a heads up, could you please provide references when you make changes like this? The existing references only provided details about the change and not the specific date. I have corrected this, but just a tip for next time. Regards. – Nick Mitchell 98 ^talk 06:52, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Food Network page move

Hi. Can you please explain the resoning behind the page move of Food Network (Australia) to "SBS Food Network"? The channel's name does not have the "SBS" prefix as can be shown on its official website on SBS: [1] and various other media outlets. – Nick Mitchell 98 ^talk 06:58, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

It's all because of SBS Viceland's name. SBS are probably doing an mistake by referring the channel (Food) without SBS in its name, but they are referring the Viceland channel WITH SBS in its name. So it looks like that's what the channel should be called. Aaron's The Best (talk) 07:03, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

And it also seems that you forgot to revert the page to its original name. Aaron's The Best (talk) 07:06, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Food Network (Australia). Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Wikipedia articles are written based on provable evidence, and the evidence says that the channel is named "Food Network", not "SBS Food Network". We can't just make assumptions over how a company operates and change articles against what the evidence indicates. P.S. I have asked for the page name to be reverted because your move has disabled me from moving the page back without administrator help. – Nick Mitchell 98 ^talk 07:10, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

@Aaron's The Best: @Nick Mitchell 98: I've moved the page back to its original location. The new channel may be called SBS Viceland, but there's so far nothing to suggest Food Network will also get the SBS suffix (although it may come, but nothing that can be sourced). -- Whats new?^(talk) 07:24, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination for IOS 6 Maps and ABC 4 Kids Channel

Hi there. I wanted to let you know that I have nominated IOS 6 Maps and ABC 4 Kids Channel for deletion as these redirects are unecessary and are based on misnomers (i.e. a wrong or inaccurate name).

If you feel that the redirect shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. Regards. – Nick Mitchell 98 ^talk 10:15, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Google Pixel.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Google Pixel.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. ViperSnake151  Talk  21:51, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

License tagging for File:BBC First (Australia).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:BBC First (Australia).jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:05, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

File source problem with File:BBC First (Australia).jpg

Thank you for uploading File:BBC First (Australia).jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nthep (talk) 19:05, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

License tagging for File:WIN HD 2008 logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:WIN HD 2008 logo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 10:05, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of GoldenWest7

A tag has been placed on GoldenWest7 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Nick Mitchell 98 ^talk 01:21, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

List of digital television channels in Australia + Aspire TV

Hi. In regards to your recent edits on List of digital television channels in Australia, allow me to explain why I have reverted some of your edits.

Firstly, ABC's primary channel does broadcast on LCN 2, 20 and 21. Please note that just because a channel does not appear on your TV, it doesn't mean that it doesn't exist.

Secondly, Aspire TV ceased broadcasting on SGS/SCN during the regional TV shakeup on 1 July 2016. Unless you live in the area and/or can provide adequate evidence that suggests otherwise, please do not add it back.

Thirdly, please be careful when changing the details concerning which station broadcasts with network, as you did with MTN and AMN by incorrectly switching the Seven and Ten affiliations.

If you have any questions or comments, please don't hesitate to ask. Regards. – Nick Mitchell 98 ^talk 11:14, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

License tagging for File:SBS Viceland logo 2016.png

Thanks for uploading File:SBS Viceland logo 2016.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:10, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Just added Cc-by-sa-3.0 to the page. If it dosen't fit the image, please remove it. Aaron's The Best (talk) 06:37, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

That tag does not fit. All logos are copyrighted, and you have to claim usage under fair use. Read this article: Wikipedia:Non-free content -- Whats new?^(talk) 06:54, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Update: Even though I did it after noticing your reply, I replaced it with Non-Free-Logo. It fits! Aaron's The Best (talk) 22:42, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

List of digital television channels in Australia

Hi. In regards to your previous edits on List of digital television channels in Australia I would like to make a suggestion. If you would like to freely experiment with the coding for the article's tables, you are free to use the SANDBOX. This is a space that allows users to experiment with new ideas for Wikipedia articles. More information on the SANDBOX can be found here, while your personal user SANDBOX can be found here. If you have any further questions, please don't hesitate to ask. I am available if you require help with the article in question. Regards. – Nick Mitchell 98 ^talk 07:08, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:SBS Viceland logo 2016.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SBS Viceland logo 2016.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:57, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

I just put that image on the SBS 2 page, where nobody notices my image. That page is meanful to the image. Aaron's The Best (talk) 19:05, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Edit war caution: SBS 2

Your recent editing history at SBS 2 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. – Nick Mitchell 98 ^talk 09:46, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Verifiable sources

Hi. In regards to your recent edits concerning the revival of ABC HD, I would like to inform you that MediaSpy is not recognised as a reliable source by Wikipeidia. MediaSpy is an online forum that is classified as a self-published source, such sources, while useful for keeping informed in certain fields, are "largely not acceptable as sources" due to their nature of being anonymously-fueled content that "Anyone can create a personal web page or publish their own book, and also claim to be an expert in a certain field". If you wish to add content that you read on an online forum, please attempt to find reliable sources that communicate that same information such as a newspaper article, online journal, or news report. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. Regards. – Nick Mitchell 98 ^talk 04:17, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

UPDATE: I'm sorry to say that ABC HD's launch date has been confirmed by the ABC. It's 6 December 2016, just like MediaSpy said. If you can look up the ABC on Twitter, you can see that the launch date for ABC HD is 6 December 2016. If you have seen it, please reply. (I'm also posting this on your talk page, so you can see the fact about ABC HD's launch date). Aaron's The Best (talk) 05:33, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

I'm sorry to say that the ABC has only recently confirmed the launch date, when I initially contacted you, it was nothing more than a rumour on an online forum with no credible backing (please read above concerning credible sources). Please see my talk page for my full response. Regards. – Nick Mitchell 98 ^talk 11:52, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Central Coast (New South Wales)

I have reverted your move of this page. This was not an uncontroversial or technical move, and so should not have been done without discussion. The Central Coast is the name of the region, it is not the 'central' coast of the state of NSW, that would be much further north. The idea that it needed to be 'paired' with a USA region article is irrelevant, and the name you gave the article was simply incorrect. Please take time to get the opinions of others before making this kind of move in future. Thank you, Melcous (talk) 03:35, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

I would also like to make a similar comment concerning your activity in page moves. Uncontroversial technical moves require a lot more than simply moving the page, the move request needs to be assessed for its validity (viewing talk pages and prior move discussions is a useful step) before the move can be made. A seven-day waiting period is generally accepted as a good time to leave the request for any potential discussions. Please try to avoid careless page moves in future without the proper research, more information can be found at WP:RM. Regards. – Nick Mitchell 98 ^talk 11:57, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Revolution Radio (single (single) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Revolution Radio (single (single). Since you had some involvement with the Revolution Radio (single (single) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 14:03, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Aaron's The Best! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 20:48, Sunday, November 20, 2016 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Aaron's The Best. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Redirect of User talk:The Wikipedia Adventure

What is this edit all about? And this one? Given the number of issues that have been raised on your talk page we may have to start considering whether there is a WP:COMPETENCE problem here. Please slow down. Consult with other editors before attempting structural changes like page moves and deletion nominations. You are still very new here and don't have enough experience and knowledge of policy to fully understand all the implications. SpinningSpark 14:22, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Angry Birds, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.

Even more serious is the fact that there is a strong consensus against having the text you restored in the article. If you disagree, you have to bring the matter to the article's talk page and try to get a consensus in favour of the text, but you should be prepared that the previous such discussion (here) ended in a strong consensus against including it only a few days ago. bonadea contributions talk 06:34, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Use of uncontroversial move technical requests

sorry but @Melcous: is correct : Melcous moved page Central Coast of New South Wales to Central Coast (New South Wales) over redirect: Restore correct title. This is not an uncontroversial/technical move; it is incorrect. "Pairing" it with a region in the USA is irrelevant. Thanks for edits but best to check in the categories of articles how similar articles are titled. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:28, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

The Octonauts

I reverted your move of the article The Octonauts to Octonauts, and restored the definite article in the mentions of the show in the article itself. Sources such as this one confirm that the name includes the definite article. It might very well be that when the show was exported to e.g. Canada and Australia the name was changed to remove "The", but for the Wikipedia article it makes more sense to use the original form of the name. If you disagree, please start a discussion on the article's talk page; I am not passionate about the subject one way or another, but I would caution you against making this kind of move without first discussing it with other editors who do have an interest in the subject. Cheers, --bonadea contributions talk 12:03, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

November 2016

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 06:21, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Premature article edits with no reliable sources

Hi. In regards to your edits concerning Prime's launch of high definition simulcasting, I would like to point out that nothing official has been confirmed and these are only unsupported rumours. Your edits have come into conflict with the policy WP:CRYSTALBALL which states "Individual scheduled or expected future events should be included only if the event is notable and almost certain to take place. [...] If preparation for the event is not already in progress, speculation about it must be well documented." As there have been no official comments on the issue of Prime's launch of high definition, we cannot add this information.

This is becoming a reoccurring issue with you as I cautioned you in October 2016 concerning your edits to Food Network (Australia) in which you made edits and page based on your prediction of a channel rename; and in November 2016 concerning the rebranding of SBS 2 to SBS Viceland - where you made premature edits to the article despite the rebrand having not occurred yet - and concerning the revival of ABC HD.

I have reverted your edits for the reasons discussed above. If you have any problems with this issue, please consult me and/or familiarise yourself with Wikipedia policy, particularly WP:CRYSTALBALL and WP:RELIABLE. Please note that once Prime have officially announced a launch of high definition simulcasting, the information can be re-added, but not before. Regards. – Nick Mitchell 98 ^talk 08:16, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Orphaned non-free image File:Dance Juniors (Wii) cover.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dance Juniors (Wii) cover.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:31, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Just Dance Kids Wii cover.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Just Dance Kids Wii cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:45, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Just Dance Kids (2010 video game listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Just Dance Kids (2010 video game. Since you had some involvement with the Just Dance Kids (2010 video game redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 03:52, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Visible ( ) parenthesis

Hi Aaron, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Just_Dance_Kids&oldid=prev&diff=752863331 I think someone in dab style guide it says to leave the bracket visible. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 20:45, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle

Hello,

I've noticed that during the past few days, you've attempted to revert moves by other editors reverting your moves with requests at WP:RMTR (such as the request to move The View (U.S. TV series) to The View (American TV series) you posted here that I moved to full discussion). On Wikipedia, there is a policy called Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle (commonly abbreviated as WP:BRD). This policy basically states that if you make a bold edit or page move, if someone reverts that edit, the next step is to discuss your proposed change to form community consensus for the change. If someone reverts an edit of yours, that means that your edit was controversial, and needs to be discussed. Continuously reverting others' reverts without discussion could lead you to break the three-revert rule, which could lead you to be reported on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring for any such incidents. Such incidents can lead to blocks. In the future, please open up a discussion to form consensus for your changes if they are reverted or opposed. Steel1943 (talk) 23:39, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Just Dance Kids 2014 Wii cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Just Dance Kids 2014 Wii cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aaron's The Best (talk) 06:10, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Be careful when you action move requests

You recently moved Manjima Grandhasala to Quba Educational Trust based on nothing except the request from a brand-new editor. If you had checked the article's history you would have noticed that the editor had just overwritten an article with new content about a different organisation. There were also no sources at all about the new organisation, so you could have no way of knowing whether the request was in fact plausible. New editors are not always aware of Wikipedia naming policies and other policies, and at least a minimum of checking before actioning such requests has to be done. --bonadea contributions talk 06:49, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

I think I understand why you created a new page with the content added by the new editor, but although it is nice to be helpful to new users, it's still vital to be more or less certain that content that is added is in fact valid. As there were no sources at all mentioning this organisation, and their own website link leads to an "Account suspended" page, there is no way of knowing whether the foundation exists. As it happens, the "new user" has been using Wikipedia for several years using different accounts and creating new ones when the old ones are blocked. His objects are apparently to promote himself and his work (such as this organisation) and to remove articles about competing scholars and people with the same name as himself. You could not have known this, of course. But it is another reason to be certain, based on independent sources and not only the word of a fellow editor, that encyclopedia content we add is verifiable. --bonadea contributions talk 09:11, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016

What was this edit about? --bonadea contributions talk 07:03, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

The removal of the words μm, which make no sense with the content and I believe they are in a different language. Aaron's The Best (talk) 07:55, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

It is the symbol representing the unit micrometre. Like many similar symbols it uses Greek letters, including in English text. --bonadea contributions talk 08:02, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Quba Educational Trust

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Quba Educational Trust, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. bonadea contributions talk 07:56, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Quba Educational Trust

The article Quba Educational Trust has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:ORG. No references given to establish notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bradv 15:30, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Closing the Go! Kids AfD

Could you please explain why you closed the AfD for Go! Kids. Under what reason did you close the debate as a non-admin before the general discussion period when consensus was not clear? Your closure does not appear to meet any of the list of appropriate closures for non-admins - specifically you closed before the full period and thus no clear keep outcome, there had been discussion, the article does not meet speedy keep requirements and there were no technical reasons to close the debate early. FUrthermore, as creator of the article, you have a potential conflict of interet in the debate, and should not be the one to make the decision. You closed the debate minutes are replying with a keep vote. PLease expalin your actions, as I plan to submit a formal review notice. -- Whats new?^(talk) 01:44, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

It was an useless deletion, so I did an reply and closed it. As someone said before, Nine says that the new Hi-5 will be aired on Go! Kids and NOT 9Go!. The page might expand in the future, so let's just wait. Aaron's The Best (talk) 02:48, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

That is in your opinion that it is "useless." There was NOT a clear consensus on the topic, with other users voting to merge. You closed the debate (as a non-admin) prematurely without explaining why. Did you read the conditions under which this can occur? It doesn't sound like it. So I ask again, can you please explain under which policy you closed the debate? Not your personal reasons for doing so, but the procedural requirement you were following? -- Whats new?^(talk) 05:40, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Deletion review for Go! Kids

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Go! Kids. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. -- Whats new?^(talk) 05:48, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

• @Whats new?: I have reopened the deletion discussion, since the closure was so completely out of policy. Safiel (talk) 05:51, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Go! Kids.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. DO NOT CLOSE Article for Deletion discussions on articles you have created. It is a grave breach of policy. If you do it again, we will be having this discussion on the Administrator's Noticeboard. I have reopened the discussion and it will stay open until either an Administrator or an uninvolved neutral editor closes it after the full seven days have elapsed. You will get no further warnings on this subject. Safiel (talk) 05:49, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Ways to improve SiivaGunner

Hi, I'm Meatsgains. Aaron's The Best, thanks for creating SiivaGunner!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Consider adding reliable sources to avoid the page being nominated for deletion.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Meatsgains (talk) 04:11, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of SiivaGunner

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on SiivaGunner requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 04:14, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of SiIvaGunner

A tag has been placed on SiIvaGunner requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

'

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Aaron's The Best (talk) 05:21, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ten Network Holdings' iPhone apps

A tag has been placed on Ten Network Holdings' iPhone apps requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Whats new?^(talk) 04:30, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Channel Ten's Android app web ad (2012).jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Channel Ten's Android app web ad (2012).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Whats new?^(talk) 05:18, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Channel Ten's Android app web ad (2012).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Channel Ten's Android app web ad (2012).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Stop removing tags from the image page. You have not fixed either issue and your edits are becoming disruptive. You have not given a reasonable rationale for fair-use. The image is not used on any article, and only on one of your user subpages, which is not permitted under fair-use criteria. Wikipedia is not a file hosting service for personal use. -- Whats new?^(talk) 23:23, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 'Tis the Season, you may be blocked from editing.

This was extremely inappropriate - it doesn't matter that you changed it yourself immediately. Please do not do anything like that again, it's vandalism, and an editor with your experience should understand that. bonadea contributions talk 09:49, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 'Tis the Season. as per editor above (repeat warning)...but to take into account the previous disruption and warnings. Vandalising the current Google Doodle is in itself a last warning due to the amount of disruption caused, let alone with the other issues above. Stop now, else you will be blocked. Widefox; talk 12:38, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Aaron's The Best: Ownership and CIR issues. --bonadea contributions talk 11:36, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Non-free image use

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to a page, specifically User:Aaron's The Best/Ten Network Holdings' iPhone apps, may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:48, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi Aaron's The Best. I just want to let you know that I removed File:Channel Ten's Android app web ad (2012).jpg from User:Aaron's The Best/Ten Network Holdings' iPhone apps per WP:UP#Non-free images because non-free images are only allowed to be used in the article namespace per WP:NFCC#9. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:51, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Your userpage

Hi, Aaron's The Best, you'll likely not be pleased about this but I have suppressed a number of edits to your userspace which reveal too much personally identifiable information about yourself. I've done this per policy and for your own protection and safety on-line as you are a self-declared minor. I'm really sorry about that and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add it. For some useful information on privacy and safety, take a look at Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors. Thanks, and sorry for messing about with your pages. -- HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:33, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

December 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at SES/RTS. -- Whats new?^(talk) 00:07, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at SES/RTS. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- samtar ^{talk or stalk} 12:41, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Whoops

Sorry, I didn't mean to revert you there. If you're inserting more information into an article, however, can you source it? Thanks. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 22:20, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Final warning

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tracey Ullman.

This is the edit in question. --bonadea contributions talk 21:43, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

ANI notice regarding your editing

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:38, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017

Greetings. Some of your recent edits do not appear to be civil toward other editors. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to (re-?) familiarize yourself with our policies and guidelines. In particular, it's relevant that WP:CIVIL says, "Editors are expected to be reasonably cooperative, ... to work within the scope of policies, and to be responsive to good-faith questions."You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Trivialist (talk) 22:28, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm FallingGravity. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Office Assistant have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ^Falling_Gravity 20:24, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Complete Works of Shakespeare, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 21:31, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 10 days for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per the complaint at ANI. You blanked the Tracey Ullman article for no reason, and have not responded to either of the last two ANI complaints about your behavior. This block might be lifted if you can explain what's been happening lately. You have more than 1,000 edits and do show some knowledge of Wikipedia, though you've acquired many complaints on your user talk since September. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 02:22, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Aaron's The Best (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

First, I've been an very good user, and I don't need to be blocked for 10 days. Next, someone undid my edits on the Office Assistant and Complete Works of Shakespeare, BUT they weren't vandalism. For the former, I just changed every Clippy to Clippit to show his proper name (although people call him Clippy, and Microsoft are calling him that now), alongsides moving some out-placed words to an fitting place. For the later, I just removed all red links, and some words that sounded like an "advisement", according to my brother Ashley. Now for the big vandalism on Tracy Ullman, I'll just explain it to you. After looking at some (now-undone) vandalism on the Eleven (Australian TV channel) page, which included an link to him, I figured out that I'll make a joke on the page that she "was an man who created a hit comedy series called The Tracy Ullman Show (yes it is real), the invention of The Simpsons", which counted as vandalism. Soon, that got (properly) undone, like every other vandalism. And so I got blocked for 10 days. I had gotten blocked a few days before for 31 unneeded hours. I've made good changes to random pages, so I need to be unblocked. Thanks. Aaron's The Best (talk) 00:37, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I've examined the problems here, EdJohnston's comment below, and your unblock request. All I'm really hearing is "I did some vandalism, I also did some good stuff, I need to be unblocked". Well, no, you do not need to be unblocked. The question is not about what you need but about what's best for Wikipedia. I'm not seeing any understanding of why your vandalism was so destructive, and I'm not seeing anything from you at all that addresses how your behaviour will change if unblocked. I'm not going to escalate your block to indefinite right now, but it is a serious possibility - you have the remainder of the next 10 days to convince us not to do that. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 01:12, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello Aaron, I'm the blocking admin. Your user talk page, since September 2016, is a steady stream of complaints by others about your editing (with a couple of exceptions). I don't think you have good enough judgment to be editing on Wikipedia. As User:SpinningSpark said (above) on 22 November, "Given the number of issues that have been raised on your talk page we may have to start considering whether there is a WP:COMPETENCE problem here." The reviewing admin ought to consider if your block should be made indefinite. EdJohnston (talk) 01:00, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, I was confused why you wanted to restore "Clippit". After a little study I recognized it's the original name of the paperclip guy. If you want to avoid this I suggest including an WP:Edit summary with your edits. ^Falling_Gravity 03:54, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Complete Works of Shakespeare, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that.

You were blocked for disruptive editing including the edit to Complete Works of Shakespeare, and the first thing you do when the block is lifted is to redo the blanking without even so much as an edit summary or an attempt to understand why your edit had been reverted? Not okay. It is not a constructive edit, and if you don't understand why you have to try to find out. The explanation you gave in your unblock message was that "your brother said it was promotional" which amounts to nonsense. It is not in any way promotional, and why does your brother tell you how to edit? bonadea contributions talk 06:30, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:40, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

• I really hate to have had to do this, but you waited out a block and then went and repeated some of the same edits that resulted in the block, without appearing to have understood what the problem was at all. Coupled with the large number of warnings you have received in such a short time at Wikipedia, I'm afraid I just don't see you as possessing the maturity and understanding required to work on Wikipedia just yet. You are obviously young (don't tell us - keep your personal details confidential), and I'm sure you'll be much more capable in the future. So I suggest you find other things to occupy your spare time for now, and try again here when you're a little older. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:40, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of That's What I Like (Flo Rida song)

Hello, Aaron's The Best. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, That's What I Like (Flo Rida song), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:59, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Toasted TV second logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Toasted TV second logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Safiel (talk) 01:26, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Toasted TV original logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Toasted TV original logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Safiel (talk) 01:26, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Go! Kids 2016 logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Go! Kids 2016 logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Go! Kids 2016 logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Go! Kids 2016 logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lifestyle Home logo 2016.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lifestyle Home logo 2016.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lifestyle You logo 2016.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lifestyle You logo 2016.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Freesat logo 2016.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Freesat logo 2016.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Behind The News 2016 logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Behind The News 2016 logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Srdemuro/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Srdemuro/sandbox, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
• It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://sg.style.yahoo.com/upcoming-superstar-julian-kerins-setting-083408792.html. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
  If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PRAXIDICAE🌈 00:03, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of State Focus for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article State Focus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/State Focus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Yours sincerely, TechGeek105 (his talk page) 23:27, 24 September 2023 (UTC)