User talk:Titodutta/Archive 57
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 50 | ← | Archive 55 | Archive 56 | Archive 57 | Archive 58 | Archive 59 | Archive 60 |
Problem with vote counter
Congrats at exceeding 100 !votes! I think you broke the counter! (kidding) Actually, since the numbers are recording properly in the text, I suspect it's just a problem with the bot that creates that little summary box. If it doesn't fix itself in a day or so, you might drop a note to the bot operator.--MelanieN (talk) 19:04, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- That's fine. Thanks. --Tito☸Dutta 19:13, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- In fact the same thing is happening with mine. I have 86 votes but the counter shows 82. So it is the bot. --MelanieN (talk) 19:24, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, that's sad. Your suggestion seems to be the best. Wait for 12 hours or so, and then someone should go ahead to alert WT:RFA or bot-owner. Regards. (I started checking your edits and contribs, but could never finish it, as I am checking my watchlist in every 10 mins, do me a favour, please remind me on/after 19 (Jan), if I don't vote there till then.) Regards. --Tito☸Dutta 19:31, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 19:31, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- I dropped a note at Chillum's talk page; not sure if they are the bot operator or not, but they were active in the history page of that bot. (Template:RfA tally) Actually Talk:RfA is a good suggestion, I'll drop a note there too. Yes, it is kind of hectic, isn't it? Good training for being an admin, where you never know what is going to drop into your inbox. --MelanieN (talk) 19:35, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, that's sad. Your suggestion seems to be the best. Wait for 12 hours or so, and then someone should go ahead to alert WT:RFA or bot-owner. Regards. (I started checking your edits and contribs, but could never finish it, as I am checking my watchlist in every 10 mins, do me a favour, please remind me on/after 19 (Jan), if I don't vote there till then.) Regards. --Tito☸Dutta 19:31, 15 January 2015 (UTC) 19:31, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- In fact the same thing is happening with mine. I have 86 votes but the counter shows 82. So it is the bot. --MelanieN (talk) 19:24, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Not the operator. Chillum 21:46, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- You both need to wait for Cyberbot I (talk · contribs) to update the counter, which is transcluded from User:Cyberpower678/Tally. Bot owner is Cyberpower678 (talk · contribs). --Redrose64 (talk) 19:38, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- @Titodutta and MelanieN: Got it. See this message - all bots went down at 18:00 (UTC) today, which is a few minutes after User:Cyberpower678/Tally was last updated. --Redrose64 (talk) 21:07, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for informing. --Tito☸Dutta 21:08, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- OK, that explains it. So things should all be back in operation within 24 hours, without anybody having to fix anything. Thanks, Redrose, very helpful. --MelanieN (talk) 22:13, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
- @Titodutta and MelanieN: Got it. See this message - all bots went down at 18:00 (UTC) today, which is a few minutes after User:Cyberpower678/Tally was last updated. --Redrose64 (talk) 21:07, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
TTT-2015 Registration
Hi, thanks for your interest to participate in TTT-2015. Could you please finish the second step of the registration process as outlined here? Thanks--Vishnu (talk) 13:21, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
- @Visdaviva:, yep Done --Tito☸Dutta 13:32, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
I don't think it is premature
- to say congratulations on passing your RfA! 1 hour to go, and barring a massive asteroid strike on the planet, I would say you have the mop. It is a heavy burden, but you can do it, for the sake of the community. With all best wishes Irondome (talk) 18:47, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
New user
Alreadt noticed our "newbie" JaguarEyes? Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 15:53, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- Hi @Joshua Jonathan:, no I did not notice this user. Do you want me to check specific edit(s)? --Tito Dutta (talk) 16:19, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- Just have a look at his contributions: he's focused at promoting the "Indigenous Aryans" perspective. I've already noted him that he looks like a SPA and NOTHERE; i expect problems with him. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 17:04, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- User:Joshua Jonathan, I don't know much about this subject. Probably you should approach User:Sitush or WT:INB? --Tito Dutta (talk) 17:29, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks. Sitush aready noticed this one, I guess. Others did so too. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 19:24, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, Sitush did :) And RegentsPark also responded. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 20:01, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks. Sitush aready noticed this one, I guess. Others did so too. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 19:24, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
- Just have a look at his contributions: he's focused at promoting the "Indigenous Aryans" perspective. I've already noted him that he looks like a SPA and NOTHERE; i expect problems with him. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 17:04, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Much talk
Please participate in some of the discussions about Editor Retention beginning at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Editor Retention#Creator of WER takes a break and hands in admin tools. Buster Seven Talk 13:44, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- I have posted a short reply there. A longer reply here— (with due respect to Dennis Brown) a project must not be totally dependent on a person. The project must go on. --Tito Dutta (talk) 13:58, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Adopting me!
Hey, this is Cartermassey. I am best able to help Wikipedia by putting my astute grammatical skills to use by fixing sentence and paragraph flow. I am an IT support specialist by trade, so I usually am able to look at other code in the article and mimic its syntax, should I need to do any complex wiki editing. Despite this, I often get stumped because I lack a ground-up understanding of how to write an article.
Thanks in advance for your help adopting me! --CarterMassey (talk) 18:41, 23 January 2015 (UTC)cartermassey
- That's fine. I hope that I'll be able to answer your coding or other queries. Regards. --Tito Dutta (talk) 01:07, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
FL
I appreciate your input here. Thank you. Jim Carter 14:07, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
- I'll check. --Tito Dutta (talk) 01:09, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Can you check this please?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Heroes_of_the_Resistance — Preceding unsigned comment added by प्रजापति (talk • contribs) 23:10, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Abhishek Bachchan filmography/archive1
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Abhishek Bachchan filmography/archive1. Thanks. Jim Carter (from public cyber) 12:41, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the
Justification for page protection
What qualifies as enough disruptive editing for page protection? Is there a specific time frame or amount? JayJ47 (talk) 04:25, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
- Probably you are taking about Novak Djokovic career statistics. I felt there was not a a significant amount of disruption or vandalism from new or unregistered users. --Tito Dutta (talk) 05:35, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
AfD possibly of interest
Is this discussion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ranikuthi something that you would like to contribute to? --MelanieN (talk) 02:00, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
- Ranikuthi is am area of South Kolkata, a popular area. It is just 5-6 km from the place where I live. The article should be kept\, but I can not establish notability, see WP:INDAFDKI. You may search using "Ranikthi Rehents Park" "Rankuthi telephone exchange", "রানীকুঠি কলকাতা". --Tito Dutta (talk) 05:40, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 28 January 2015
- From the editor: An editorial board that includes you
- In the media: A murderous week for Wikipedia
- Traffic report: A sea of faces
Participant selection Train the Trainer 2015
You have been selected to join TTT 2015 | ||
Hello Titodutta, Congratulations!!! You have been selected to attend the Wikipedia Train the Trainer program at Bangalore during 26 February to 1 March 2015. We are excited to see you in Bangalore! We request you to please arrange your travel schedule to reach Bangalore by 25 February, 2015 evening and plan to leave on 1 March 2015 evening or 2 March, 2015 morning. CIS-A2K will reimburse you costs of the local travel incurred. We will be in touch with you over e-mail and mobile for further coordination. If you have any queries please leave a message here. |
Manifesto of Aam Aadmi Party
Hi Titodutta, I just noticed that you, probably accidentally, removed the link to AAP election manifesto in the Delhi election 2015 page. I am going to revert it back as it is valuable information. Please talk to me User:Jineshkj if you still think the content needs removal. Thanks — Preceding undated comment added 02:26, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- See WP:ELPOINTS #2. EL in almost never added in article body. And there is no reason to add a manifesto link there. --Tito Dutta (talk) 04:09, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Re: status
I am extremely irregular in wikipedia as of now.--Dwaipayan (talk) 07:01, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- Dwaipayan I guess that beats being irregular in real life :) I wonder if there is a Wikipedia laxative you could take? Bgwhite (talk) 08:56, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Test Wiki flag requests
I am requesting admin, checkuser, and import right the Test Wiki --Tito Dutta (talk) 09:25, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Yes, I want to be adopted.
Yes, I've been looking for being adapted, preferably for technology related articles. Jacksparrow43 (talk) 19:13, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Abhishek Bachchan filmography
I have fixed the issue you had raised at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Abhishek Bachchan filmography/archive1. Now, is the article deserves a full support instead of "Almost Support"? Best, Jim Carter 10:26, 12 February 2015 (UTC) Thanks! Jim Carter 12:28, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
- Done. --Tito Dutta (talk) 12:29, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:40, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Blocking confusion
Excuse me but would you perhaps be able to fill me in why the blocked user PabloOsvaldo17 had been persecuted by C. Fred over an argument in connection with the edit war on the Xherdan Shaqiri article on Wikipedia (EN)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.146.12.217 (talk • contribs) 13:39, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
- I'm not removing either this post or the next, but after PabloOsvaldo17 was blocked, he used at least one sockpuppet account in addition to editing while not logged in from the above-mentioned IP address. It's hardly persecution to enforce a block. —C.Fred (talk) 14:51, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
- C.Fred has already replied here. If you want to report something, please go to WP:ANI or WP:AN. --Tito Dutta (talk) 20:32, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
G flat major
Tito,
The article as it currently resides in Wikipedia is not very complete. Last year I did an extensive search for all quality instrumental compositions in that key and came up with the the list I attempted to add. This is the only such list in existence and it should appear somewhere on the web. Was the problem the format? This key is very special and the number of pieces in it are small in comparison to keys with four flats or sharps or less. I also added a list for F sharp major that you may also not like.
Stephen Jablonsky DrMusicArt (talk) 23:00, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
- User:DrMusicArt Which article? Please link. --Tito Dutta (talk) 23:05, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Hatfield Galleria
You are free to undo my edit on the above Shopping Centre, however two points to note, firstly the shops you have listed many have closed, one recently was HMV, Whittard`s closed nearly two years, and we go on with many more, so the information you are projecting is incorrect. Secondly, as it states on the header the article appears to be an advertisement for the centre, as opposed to a factual statement of account. Therefore it would suggest you are being instructed to run the page as a straight advertisement. To local people in the Borough (Welwyn-Hatfield) we wish the information to be accurate as possible, however you appear intent upon stopping any other person from changing your view and opinion on the Galleria, which rather goes against the purpose of Wikipedia. (Ellis-Oakley (talk) 19:56, 2 February 2015 (UTC))
- You are talking about this edit. You made changes (that included heading format changes too) without any edit summary or showing any reason. --Tito Dutta (talk) 20:14, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- Titodutta, I was asked as an editor to look at this article. There's a great deal of promotionalism to remove, and the contributor above seems to have been trying to remove some of it to justify a removal of the "advert" tag. Some of the changes seem appropriate, and there's a good many more to make--the extensive information about location is out of proportion.
- The Wikipedia article is intended for general readers who want the sort of information available in an encyclopedia. It is not intended for readers in the (Welwyn-Hatfield) area who want travel directions oran exact specification of what is available there. Such information belongs on their web site, not here.
- I am going to do some editing based on the better quality work on similar centers--I say better quality, because most of the ones in this subject field are at least somewhat promotional. DGG ( talk ) 16:43, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
- DGG, yes that is right. Almost the entire article is unsourced. There might in another problem in such articles — figures and facts change almost every month/few weeks (at least in India).
There are more than 80 designer outlets already trading. . .
— it becomes unclear unless they mention "when?" Local transports/how to reach" are Wikivoyage content. Only 2 floor? We have a similar article South City Mall, that is just 4 km from my residence, has 5 floors and is double in size. I feel, the gallery section is unnecessary too, but the article is in a better condition. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Google News has few articles/mentions. --Tito Dutta (talk) 01:16, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- (stalking) @DGG: I've heard of the Galleria, a number of British shopping centres including Bluewater, Lakeside ("What's a chavs favourite w(h)ine?" "I wanna go to Lakeside!") and the Metro Centre get mentioned on local TV and radio all the time (usually in conjunction with congestion on traffic reports eg: "queues southbound on the A1(M) past the Galleria towards the M25, give the area a miss if I were you"). Anyway, the article is definitely notable IMHO and just needs a lot of cleanup. I've added one book source that briefly describes its history, and hopefully I'll find more. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:34, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 04 February 2015
- Op-ed: Is Wikipedia for sale?
- In the media: Gamergate and Muhammad controversies continue
- Traffic report: The American Heartland
- Featured content: It's raining men!
- Arbitration report: Slamming shut the GamerGate
- WikiProject report: Dicing with death – on Wikipedia?
- Technology report: Security issue fixed; VisualEditor changes
- Gallery: Langston Hughes
- Checking... --Tito Dutta (talk) 11:53, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
About "President's rule of Delhi, 2014"
Hi Tito,
I moved Delhi Legislative Assembly election, 2014 to President's rule of Delhi, 2014 while it was in the middle of that AfD discussion, which was an error of judgement on my part. As an admin, you can read the deleted content.
This purely about content. I'm not going to re-create it. Do you think an article about the interim period should be created? Maybe we should discuss this at the noticeboard?
What do you think? --Shirt58 (talk) 10:43, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
- Hello Shirt58, firstly there was no Delhi Assembly election in 2014. What you suggested "President's rule" — that might be an option — but we do not really have articles on President's_rule#Instances_of_President.27s_rule. Yes, it seems to be a WT:INB topic. --Tito Dutta (talk) 12:03, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
Taj Mahal
Hi Tito,
Might be busy with the Mop, eh? Well, can you join me to bring Taj Mahal to FA status. Its a GA for over 9 years and it stable. I have done some trifles but need your help for more. Ping me if you agree. Thanks in advance. - The Herald (here I am) 14:43, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Not really User:The Herald, I am busy with some other tasks including the upcoming meta:India Access To Knowledge/Events/Train the Trainer Program/2015 where I need to give a very short presentation on "editorial responsibilities". I do not really work on FA, and an article Swami Vivekananda — that we are planning to take to FA for more than a year (time to resume work most probably). I'll see. --Tito Dutta (talk) 21:33, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
- Hi again. Can you just run a copy-edit over it. Its almost ready, IMO. Is there any other guys who might be interested in it? Well, its shame for me to say that I know very few Indian editors, except Soham and the like, who seem to have retired. Thanks. - The Herald (here I am) 04:26, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- You may ask at WT:INB. Or User:Nvvchar, Retigerxyz, Dr. Blofled, Ekabhishek, MelanieN may help. --Tito Dutta (talk) 06:17, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
- Hi again. Can you just run a copy-edit over it. Its almost ready, IMO. Is there any other guys who might be interested in it? Well, its shame for me to say that I know very few Indian editors, except Soham and the like, who seem to have retired. Thanks. - The Herald (here I am) 04:26, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
February 2015 Wikification drive
Greetings! Just spreading a message to the members of WikiProject Wikify that the February drive has been started. Better late than never! Come on, sign up! :) Grinding, grinding, grinding... what are we finding, finding, finding... (talk) 00:03, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Let's talk
Let's forgive and forget, How are you? --Atcovi (talk) 16:11, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
- I am fine. Thanks. --Tito Dutta (talk) 01:30, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
I have opened the peer review for the film. Please do suggest any changes that I should make before I go for FAC. — Ssven2 speak 2 me 08:59, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
- I'll check soon. --Tito Dutta (talk) 09:15, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 February 2015
- From the editors: We want to know what you think!
- In the media: Is Wikipedia eating itself?
- Featured content: A grizzly bear, Operation Mascot, Freedom Planet & Liberty Island, cosmic dust clouds, a cricket five-wicket list, more fine art, & a terrible, terrible opera...
- Traffic report: Bowled over
- WikiProject report: Brand new WikiProjects profiled
- Gallery: Feel the love
Urgent
This pertains to an article called Nicholas Edward Alahverdian. Ok, so I noticed on reddit that people were going to spam an article on wikipedia. This has since become obvious. I managed to get it protected (by User talk:Callanecc and User:Kinu after the abuse started. As expected, the abuse came from the exmormon reddit where i had seen the mumblings about vandaising the page.
A user named Saosebastiao1(whose edits are now not viewable since the article was deleted and who initially started editing with an ip address) and a user named Villaged ended up vandalizing the article and that's when Callanecc and Kinu protected the page. I further noticed that Saosebastiao1 and Villaged could be two of the exmormon reddit people since Saosebastiao seems to have made an anti mormon remark here and Villaged matches exactly the screen name of a reddit user at exmormon. Also, Saosebastiao is an identical username for the exmormon reddit as well.
I then tried to get it speedily deleted under G4 because I noticed it was previously deleted. It was deleted. User:Nyttend reversed it and noted that it was not G4 because the article was heavily edited and contained new information. I then did a bit more research myself and found that there was more news and agreed. The article had sources about the subject from The Boston Globe, The Providence Journal, Associated Press, Brown University student newspaper, The New Haven Register, NBC news, CBS news affiliates, Politifact, ProPublica, the Omaha world herald, WPRO, WPRI, WJAR and others all directly mentioning and primarily featuring the subject. It clearly met GNG since the "topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" and it is "suitable for a stand-alone article" (see WP:Notability).
Multiple editors including User:NeilN, User:Nyttend, User:Doncram and myself made edits, supported that it met GNG, and did further research and sourced the article. Then User_talk:Floquenbeam deleted it again. This would not have happened if the page remained protected for the period until Feb 26 initiated by Callanecc. Now there are even more users (who may or may not be socks of Saosebastiao1 or Villaged) that are throwing mud at the subject of the article (also see here, here, and especially here.
And now they even have entire talk pages devoted to their libel of the subject. at the subject and even implying that I am associated with the issue or the people (I am not). Also, they are nominating pages for deletion that clearly dont need to be such as Matthew Fabisch who is a state republican party director and sitting Judge. This needs to be dealt with immediately please. EricJ1074 (talk) 07:14, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
- So many admins involved. Looks like a [{WP:ANI]] topic. --Tito Dutta (talk)
Talkback
Message added 12:40, 14 February 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Can you please explain the policies to this persistent user? Extract: "Pls note the Auther (Guruji) is learning things directly from Gorakshnath Ji in samadhi. Anyways we do not expect you to believe this. We only want the truth to be told. Unfortunately there are various false records about Nath Sampradaya in multiple sources and none of them is reliable. We only want the truth to be told. Unfortunately there are various false records about Nath Sampradaya in multiple sources and none of them is reliable." Earlier discussion: User_talk:Redtigerxyz/Archive_21#V_Imp_reverting_of_the_edits_in_wikipedia_for_Guru_Gorakshnath. Redtigerxyz Talk 12:40, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
- Hello, User:Aapune and User:Nathwarrior were blocked for indef and 1 week respectively for sock-puppetry. Most probably they are all from same group, and want to share WP:Truth here. A good thing is he stopped editing right after your revert. I have added a message and watchlisted Gorakshanath article. --Tito Dutta (talk) 22:47, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 February 2015
- News and notes: Questions raised over WMF partnership with research firm
- In the media: WikiGnomes and Bigfoot
- Gallery: Far from home
- Traffic report: Fifty Shades of... self-denial?
- Recent research: Gender bias, SOPA blackout, and a student assignment that backfired
- WikiProject report: Be prepared... Scouts in the spotlight
Happy Valentine's Day!!!
The Signpost: 18 February 2015
- In the media: Students' use and perception of Wikipedia
- Special report: Revision scoring as a service
- Gallery: Darwin Day
- Traffic report: February is for lovers
- Featured content: A load of bull-sized breakfast behind the restaurant, Koi feeding, a moray eel, Spaghetti Nebula and other fishy, fishy fish
- Arbitration report: We've built the nuclear reactor; now what colour should we paint the bikeshed?
Requesting you to protect the article Gayen from IP edits. The article was previously protected from such edits, which has expired. The article is now subject to persistent edits by an anon, who is not only unaware of our policies, but also fails to understand basics like WP:INDICSCRIPT. Thanks. Ekdalian (talk) 10:40, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
- WP:INDICSCRIPT is not a policy, it was WP:India's local consensus. You may try WP:RFPP. --Tito Dutta (talk) 11:00, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
- I am aware that WP:INDICSCRIPT is not a policy; I mentioned it as a commonly known consensus only. My point was that anons are usually unaware of policies as well as such consensus. Anyway, thanks for your suggestion. Ekdalian (talk) 11:24, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Angry intentions
I understand that the user in question did cross the line when they violated their own talk page, loading it for obscenities and showing much hatred to both Walter Görlitz and C. Fred but on what grounds can a user be sanctioned and ultimately blocked due to a complaint? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.146.12.217 (talk • contribs) 13:39, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 04 March 2015
- From the editor: A sign of the times: the Signpost revamps its internal structure to make contributing easier
- Traffic report: Attack of the movies
- Arbitration report: Bradspeaks—impact, regrets, and advice; current cases hinge on sex, religion, and ... infoboxes
- Interview: Meet a paid editor
- Featured content: Ploughing fields and trading horses with Rosa Bonheur
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Orphaned non-free image File:Bijoy Krishna Goswami.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Bijoy Krishna Goswami.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:35, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:39, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:11, 10 March 2015 (UTC)