EricJ1074

Welcome!

Hello, EricJ1074, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Chillum 19:44, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

EricJ1074, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi EricJ1074! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! AmaryllisGardener (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Discussion history

Please stop deleting discussions. They should remain to be archived so people can easily look at what happened. --Onorem (talk) 02:41, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, I was asked to do that. Thank you though. EricJ1074 (talk) 02:42, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Who asked? Where? --Onorem (talk) 02:53, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Someone asked me to stop reposting the discussion, let me get the link. EricJ1074 (talk) 02:54, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Actually, it was you: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam&oldid=646873091 sorry about that, i was trying to fix it. EricJ1074 (talk) 02:56, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

I didn't ask you to remove discussion. I questioned how many forums you were going to spam the same argument to. The community should be well aware of the issue by now. --Onorem (talk) 03:08, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

I didn't say you did. It is done. Thanks for stopping by. EricJ1074 (talk) 03:09, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

I commented on your spamming the same request to many forums. I asked you to stop deleting discussions. You said you were asked to do "that". What is "that" and who asked you to do it? --Onorem (talk) 03:25, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

You asked me not to post the discussion in multiple pages. I made a mistake and thought I was helping by deleting them. Nothing to have a discussion about, it's been fixed, won't happen again and it is done. That's all I have to say on the subject. Have a great evening =D EricJ1074 (talk) 03:29, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

RE: Your post on ANI

EricJ1074,

I've had to remove part of your post, speculating on who someone may be off wiki can be construed as Outing or Doxing , the only exception to that is if they say that they are that person. Please don't repost that information or revert my removal of it, Wikipedia taking outing and doxing very seriously. If you're convinced that this person is using multiple ID's you can report them as a sock puppet or a meat puppet and that individual will be blocked in short order. Thanks KoshVorlon Je Suis Charlie 12:11, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Information that might be useful

Hi, EricJ1074, I see you are frustrated by all of this animosity towards an article you wish to create and work on. Aside from issues about notability and copyright, you should be aware that this article was the target of a great deal of sock puppets in 2013 as you can see in Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Fred newman/Archive so this would make even tolerant admins a bit suspicious about its recreation.
At best, I think you should either go to deletion review (WP:DRV) to get the deletion decision reviewed or ask an administrator to "userfy" the article and place the content on one of your user pages where you can work on getting the article into shape.
I just wanted you to know that this confusion and conflict about a single article isn't arising out of nowhere, you've stepped in a topic that has previously been a subject of controversy. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:55, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nicholas E. Alahverdian

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nicholas E. Alahverdian, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 13:56, 4 April 2015 (UTC)