User talk:Samsmachado/Archive 1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Megalibrarygirl in topic A New Year With Women in Red!

Welcome! edit

Hello, Samsmachado, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Ipigott (talk) 11:13, 18 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red edit

Hi there, Samsmachado, and welcome to Women in Red. If you need to gain some experience in editing, I recommend you go through The Wikipedia Adventure. Once you feel ready to create your own biographies, you might then find it useful to look through our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 11:17, 18 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the help! Samsmachado (talk) 15:09, 18 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

March 2020 at Women in Red edit

 
March 2020, Volume 6, Issue 3, Numbers 150, 151, 156, 157, 158, 159


Happy Women's History Month from all of us at Women in Red.

 
 
 

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media:   Facebook /   Instagram /   Pinterest /   Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 19:33, 23 February 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

DYK for Imogen Says Nothing edit

On 18 March 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Imogen Says Nothing, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Aditi Kapil's Imogen Says Nothing is inspired by a ghost character in Much Ado About Nothing? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Imogen Says Nothing. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Imogen Says Nothing), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talkcontribs) 00:01, 18 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

April 2020 at Women in Red edit

 
April 2020, Volume 6, Issue 4, Numbers 150, 151, 159, 160, 161, 162


April offerings at Women in Red.

Online events:


Editor feedback:


Social media:   Facebook /   Instagram /   Pinterest /   Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 15:00, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Nomination of Autumn Christian for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Autumn Christian is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autumn Christian until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 13:46, 31 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Him (Cummings play) has been accepted edit

 
Him (Cummings play), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 00:26, 1 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Alice Birch edit

On 5 April 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Alice Birch, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Alice Birch's play Revolt. She Said. Revolt Again. was inspired by Valerie Solanas's SCUM Manifesto? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Alice Birch. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Alice Birch), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:01, 5 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

May 2020 at Women in Red edit

 
May 2020, Volume 6, Issue 5, Numbers 150, 151, 163, 164, 165, 166


May offerings at Women in Red.

Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Social media:   Facebook /   Instagram /   Pinterest /   Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 20:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Julien Solomita (May 7) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 03:28, 7 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Samsmachado! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 03:28, 7 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Isabella Mary Gainsford edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Isabella Mary Gainsford requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 20:07, 21 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Isabella Mary Gainsford for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Isabella Mary Gainsford is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Isabella Mary Gainsford until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 20:10, 21 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

June 2020 at Women in Red edit

 
Women in Red

June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169

Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Social media:   Facebook /   Instagram /   Pinterest /   Twitter

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

--Rosiestep (talk) 17:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Mary Love (artist) edit

Hello: Thanks for workin on this article. I changed the DOD to 1874 for Mary Love (Heaviside). The entry on biographi.ca questioning her DOD was written by an in-house researcher. I tend to believe the Archives of New Brunswick, being an official government agency, has it right. It is backed up by the Concordia artist database here. Sound OK?ThatMontrealIP (talk) 21:34, 25 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • Sounds good to me, ThatMontrealIP. I was going to do that, but then left the DOD in question because before my edits the article had 1866 as the DOD and it all seemed a little weird. But I agree that the archives should be reliable (esp. in conjunction with the artist database). Samsmachado (talk) 21:52, 25 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! edit

Thank you for your support on my talk page and especially thank you for making some necessary edits to improve the articles I've been working on, in an effort to save them. Very appreciated. You have a good heart and it's nice to see it's not all bites on here. --Wiki2008time (talk) 19:13, 12 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

A Dobos torte for you! edit

  7&6=thirteen () has given you a Dobos torte to enjoy! Seven layers of fun because you deserve it.


To give a Dobos torte and spread the WikiLove, just place {{subst:Dobos Torte}} on someone else's talkpage, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

7&6=thirteen () 10:13, 17 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Alyssa Carson edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Alyssa Carson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alyssa Carson. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ~ Amkgp 💬 16:30, 27 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Alyssa Carson for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alyssa Carson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alyssa Carson (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:02, 27 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

July 2020 at Women in Red edit

 
Women in Red / July 2020, Volume 6, Issue 7, Numbers 150, 151, 170, 171, 172, 173


Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red / Opt-out of notifications

Social media:   Facebook /   Instagram /   Pinterest /   Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 16:12, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

August 2020 at Women in Red edit

 
Women in Red | August 2020, Volume 6, Issue 8, Numbers 150, 151, 173, 174, 175


Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red | Opt-out of notifications

Social media:   Facebook |   Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:51, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Disambiguation link notification for August 13 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tony Award for Best Actress in a Play, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Beatrice.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:13, 13 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

September Women in Red edithons edit

 
Women in Red | September 2020, Volume 6, Issue 9, Numbers 150, 151, 176, 177


Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red | Opt-out of notifications

Social media:   Facebook |   Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

October editathons from Women in Red edit

 
Women in Red | October 2020, Volume 6, Issue 10, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 179


Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red | Opt-out of notifications

Social media:   Facebook |   Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter


--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:11, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Nomination of Audrey Dwyer for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Audrey Dwyer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Audrey Dwyer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 20:53, 23 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Julien Solomita (September 26) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Salimfadhley was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Salimfadhley (talk) 09:53, 26 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Samsmachado! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Salimfadhley (talk) 09:53, 26 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Original Barnstar
Thank you for creating so many well-sourced articles on Canadian women in theatre! AleatoryPonderings (talk) 05:03, 16 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

November edith-a-thons from Women in Red edit

 
Women in Red | November 2020, Volume 6, Issue 11, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 180, 181


Online events:


Join the conversation: Women in Red talkpage

Stay in touch: Join WikiProject Women in Red | Opt-out of notifications

Social media:   Facebook |   Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:50, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

December with Women in Red edit

 
Women in Red | December 2020, Volume 6, Issue 12, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 182, 183


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

  Facebook |   Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

A Barnstar for you! edit

  Women in Red Women in Asia contest
Samsmachado Thank you for your additions in November 2020 WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:56, 1 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Laura's Ghost edit

On 7 December 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Laura's Ghost, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that in publishing Laura's Ghost, the author insisted the book cover show a photo of Laura alive? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Laura's Ghost. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Laura's Ghost), and it may be added to the statistics page if it received over 400 views per hour. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 7 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Want to add my congrats on this—more than 5000 people read your entry, that is a LOT for a DYK on a book! And in just 12 hours. Job well done! Innisfree987 (talk) 01:34, 11 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

December 2020 edit

  Hello, I'm Elizium23. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, 1922, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 22:35, 16 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

A New Year With Women in Red! edit

 
 
Women in Red | January 2021, Volume 7, Issue 1, Numbers 182, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188


Online events:


Other ways to participate:

  Facebook |   Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply