Afternoon, a story edit

The plot contains an incomplete sentence... Thanx 69.142.2.68 08:27, 29 August 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

AfD nomination of Eastgate Systems edit

Eastgate Systems, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Eastgate Systems satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eastgate Systems and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Eastgate Systems during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. SWATJester Denny Crane. 19:45, 12 August 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Proposed deletion of Center for Computer Games Research edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Center for Computer Games Research, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Unreferenced for nearly three years, fails WP:V

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Stifle (talk) 10:47, 22 June 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Center for Computer Games Research edit

I have nominated Center for Computer Games Research, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Center for Computer Games Research. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Stifle (talk) 12:00, 1 July 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Lijil. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Lijil. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 9 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dziga Vertov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Kaufman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 9 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Proposed deletion of Digital Arts and Culture edit

 

The article Digital Arts and Culture has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I don't believe this is a notable organisational event. Created in 2006 and flagged for citations since 2012, limited change has occurred and no references are present

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jamzze (talk) 09:29, 9 July 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gabriele de Seta edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gabriele de Seta requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 01:10, 11 February 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nomination of Tender Claws for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tender Claws is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tender Claws until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 12:51, 5 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wow! I only just saw this! I am amazed that you would want to delete it - they have won multiple prizes and their work is cited in multiple scholarly papers which I think I referenced in the article! What can I do to contest the deletion at this point? Lijil (talk) 21:52, 23 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User talk:Davilance edit

Hi. I moved your comments on that user's user page to their talk page. Drmies (talk) 14:07, 28 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you! That makes sense. Lijil (talk) 14:26, 28 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Joanne Roberts - possible mix up up another Joanne Roberts edit

Dear Lijil, Hope is OK to bother you with this. I was looking at the AFD on Joanne Roberts and was looking up things to try and see about notability. The first entry in Selected Readings -(Amin, Ash, and Joanne Roberts. 2008. Community, economic creativity, and organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.) which was added by User:DaffodilOcean (who I have also notified) might be by another person with a similar/the same name (I thing she is not the same as the Joanne K. Roberts) See here: https://www.southampton.ac.uk/people/5x9xnm/professor-joanne-roberts. I think you added some reviews of this book to try to help with notability but.. . Just letting you know. Best wishes (Msrasnw (talk) 11:35, 29 July 2022 (UTC))Reply[reply]

Oops! Thanks for catching that! I’m moving this weekend so don’t have time to work on this but would be grateful if you fix any errors I’ve made. Thank you. Lijil (talk) 17:37, 30 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Unfortunately the article has been deleted now...so no need to worry. Best wishes Msrasnw

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Camilla Mørk Røstvik has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Camilla Mørk Røstvik. Thanks! BuySomeApples (talk) 08:49, 24 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Camilla Mørk Røstvik (February 21) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
asilvering (talk) 03:16, 21 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
 
Hello, Lijil! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! asilvering (talk) 03:16, 21 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Introductions Category edit

Hello,
I noticed you added Category:Computer-related introductions in 1845 to The Eureka. What is the purpose of this category supposed to be? I don't know what 'introduction' means in this context. And the link to what is supposed to be its parent category is broken: it redirects to Category.
Thanks, Closhund (talk) 07:50, 29 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Scratch that; someone has fixed the typo in a way I couldn't. Please disregard. Closhund (talk) 10:45, 29 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
No worries, and thank you for paying attention! I hadn't noticed the typo, so it got picked up :) Lijil (talk) 07:05, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

ChatGPT and translation edit

Hey, Lijil. I recently came across the article Fugl (novel) and found a mistranslation from Northern Sámi that changed the quote to be about something completely different. I've fixed it now. I implore you, do not use ChatGPT to translate material. It does not have the prerequisite input to handle something like that, so it outputs complete falsehoods with no way of detecting it. If you need something translated from another language, then you should try to contact someone who speaks the language to aide you. I happen to be able to translate between Northern Sámi and English (and to a lesser extent other Sámi languages), so if you encounter Sámi-language sources, please message me on my talk page. Thanks. ArcticSeeress (talk) 15:06, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thank you!! I’ll remember this :) Lijil (talk) 16:23, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your GA nomination of Electronic literature edit

The article Electronic literature you nominated as a good article has failed  ; see Talk:Electronic literature for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TompaDompa -- TompaDompa (talk) 14:21, 31 July 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 1 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Electronic literature, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sage.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your GA nomination of ReRites edit

The article ReRites you nominated as a good article has failed  ; see Talk:ReRites for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Aintabli -- Aintabli (talk) 09:02, 4 August 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tidsreiser edit

Hello, Lijil

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Tidsreiser for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:31, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tidsreiser moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Tidsreiser, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Liz Read! Talk! 07:54, 10 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nomination of Gabriele de Seta for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gabriele de Seta, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gabriele de Seta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 19 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Joan Is Awful edit

Hi Lijil! I'll ask for Talk:Joan Is Awful/GA1 to be deleted and the nomination put back in the queue if there's no response in the next couple of days. If you're still planning to review this please let me know. — Bilorv (talk) 14:36, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm sorry, I've had a family emergency and wasn't able to do this as planned. Sorry. Lijil (talk) 18:27, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
No worries and best wishes. — Bilorv (talk) 15:07, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Note about ELMCIP properties on Wikidata edit

Hi Liji,

I just got back last night after midnight & am a little sick with stuffiness & post nasal drip, so a little slow due to sinus activity. I am in the Pacific time zone, PST UTC-8. I believe that you are in Central European Time, CET UTC+1h. Thus we are a seven hour difference.

I do not know what hours you keep for this, but I am sure that we can work out something for a Zoom call that is early morning for me & a late afternoon or early evening for you. Meanwhile I will start working on the proposals for ELMCIP properties: Author, Organizations, Publishers and Journals. I think there was another that LoveElectronicLiterature & I had discussed, but I will have to check with her. Peaceray (talk) 21:42, 16 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks, Peaceray! I think the other database was The NEXT: https://the-next.eliterature.org/ I'll send you a few suggestions for times we could meet up! As I understand it there would need to be a proposal here and then there'll be a discussion and decision based on that? So probably we should make sure that ELMCIP is solid enough that the criteria are clearly met before proposing it? Having your help in figuring out how to meet those criteria and make ELMCIP work as well as possible will be very helpful. Lijil (talk) 08:21, 17 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your GA nomination of Electronic literature edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Electronic literature you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 21:21, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi, a human here. I enjoyed the article; there are just a few comments and suggestions for your attention on the review page. I'll help as I can. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:00, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Lijil, this has gone very quiet? Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:21, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Sorry, work has been busy this week; I'll be back tomorrow and through the weekend! Lijil (talk) 21:16, 31 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Women in Red edit

Hi there, Lijil, and welcome to Women in Red. I'm glad to see you now intend to spend more of your editing time creating biographies of women in electronic literature and in technology. I realize you are an experienced contributor but in this connection, you might find it useful to look through our Primer. Thank you also for writing a number of articles in connection with electronic literature and for creating WikiProject Electronic literature. According to Category:WikiProject Electronic literature articles, there are only 14 articles today but I am confident it will expand as it gains wider attention. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 08:32, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks! I only created the template that populates Category:WikiProject Electronic literature articles last week, so the category is not well populated yet. I think I need to request a bot to go through relevant categories. The template also has a women=yes parameter but I don't think I've got the code right to make it auto populate a category for articles about women. I figured joining Women in Red would help me learn more about working in a WikiProject while doing something important for the Wikipedia! Lijil (talk) 09:32, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I've been populating it manually and there are now over 200 articles. I only discovered the women option later but I've started to work on it. In connection with possible assessment (see WP Electronic literature talk page discussion), I'm also working on Class in the banner shell which will then be reflected in Elit assessments. Given the very small number of biographies of men, it looks as if it would be useful to create red lists people can work on. (Don't forget to ping me if you want me to respond.)--Ipigott (talk) 09:35, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Wow, thank you, @Ipigott! I'll look into making a red list - you mean generally for all authors of electronic literature, right? And/or maybe one for works actually. Lijil (talk) 14:01, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
There's no rush but if we are to promote the project more widely, I think one of the best ways to gain interest and involvement would be to start with redlists on the main project page. Up to now we've concentrated mainly on women but we should now make sure deserving men are also included. And works by both men and women should also lead to more articles. I was thinking we could begin by including a section on "Requested articles" along the lines of Wikipedia:Requested articles/Biography/By profession. If we start with perhaps 20 men and women authors and 20 works, that would provide an initial basis for creating new articles. Later we can perhaps develop a separate subpage.--Ipigott (talk) 14:57, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
On the basis of your project banner, I've created Template:User WikiProject Electronic literature which can added to users' talk pages. You might like to improve it.--Ipigott (talk) 15:31, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thank you @Ipigott!! Looks great! I made a Wikipedia-generated redlink list today - so exciting to figure out how to do this! I put a msg about it on the WikiProject Talk page: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Electronic literature#Redlink lists Lijil (talk) 16:25, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Women in Red February 2024 edit

 
Women in Red | February 2024, Volume 10, Issue 2, Numbers 293, 294, 297, 298


Online events:

Announcement

  • Please let other wikiprojects know about our February Black women event.

Tip of the month:

  • AllAfrica can now be searched on the ProQuest tab at the WP Library.

Other ways to participate:

  Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Ipigott (talk) 08:32, 30 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject Electronic literature/Article alert edit

 

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Electronic literature/Article alert requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

incorrect page title, correct page for bot is at WP:WikiProject Electronic literature/Article alerts

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Funandtrvl (talk) 22:52, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for spotting this. I created the page my mistake and couldn't see how to delete it - I was planning to ask someone but forgot. Lijil (talk) 09:22, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
No problem, always glad to be of help! Funandtrvl (talk) 20:37, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Progress on WP:Elit edit

As we now seem to be progressing pretty well on basics for the project, do you think it would be useful to bring it to the attention of related wikiprojects? I'm thinking of WP Literature, WP Women's literature, WP Books, WP Poetry, WP Novels, WP Science fiction, WP Children's literature, WP Computing, WP Writing, WP Video games, WP Internet and WP Internet culture. You may like to suggest more yourself. We could post a short message on their talk pages, suggesting that some of their participants might like to take part and inviting them to provide any feedback or suggestions on the Elit talk page. Perhaps Rosiestep and LoveElectronicLiterature will also have suggestions.--Ipigott (talk) 15:05, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It's a good idea, Ipigott though, IMO: (a) no rush to do it, and (b) I'd give consideration to copying/moving this message from Lijil's talkpage to a new section on the WP:Elit talkpage, with a clarifying title, e.g., "Notifying related WikiProjects" or some such. In that space, a group of interested editors could draft the message, decide who'll notify which WikiProjects, when they'll do it, etc. --Rosiestep (talk) 15:30, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Great idea! I'm going to be pretty busy elsewhere over the next days, and also need to prioritise getting Electronic literature improved since it's undergoing GA review (thank you to the patient reviewer) so I don't have time right now, but perhaps it doesn't require too much? I was also wondering about sending out info on wider mailing lists (e.g. Association of Internet Researchers) to invite people we may not yet know about. Lijil (talk) 15:19, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Good idea, Lijil. Again, I'd carry on the conversations regarding this topic on the WP:Elit talkpage, starting with a new header, something like "Notifying off-wiki mailing lists". Also, again, no rush. --Rosiestep (talk) 15:30, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I certainly think it would be an excellent idea to notify people on the mailing lists you suggest, Lijil. You might have noticed, that I have been drawing on Electronic literature in connection with articles which should have Elit on their talk pages. In doing so, I undertook a bit of non-intrusive copy editing. I'm sure it will soon be promoted to GA. As for no rush, Rosie, I certainly agree that it would be great if Deena could participate more actively in all this but on the other hand, I also think it's important to let others know what we are doing sooner rather than later. I've accidentally run into contact with contributors in related areas and I feel we need to be open about what we are doing. But let's wait a couple of weeks and see if there are any responses on the Elit talk page. There has been some interest in developments there since the beginning of February. I'm actually not at all familiar with electronic literature but thought I ought to help the project along in its early stages. You, Rosie, are certainly much more familiar with developments than I am.--Ipigott (talk) 15:52, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I hope to have the content for our off-line Wordpress site, similar to Women Do News site relatively soon. I am also going to announce our Third Thursday event on our mailing list of 40 people. And I have just put in for a wikipedia editathon at the New Media UnConference and the ELO Conference. But yes, let's work on an announcement. Who should we send it to? LoveElectronicLiterature (talk) 18:07, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your GA nomination of Electronic literature edit

The article Electronic literature you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Electronic literature for comments about the article, and Talk:Electronic literature/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chiswick Chap -- Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:00, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yay! Thank you!!! Lijil (talk) 19:01, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Congratulations! It's a really good article.--Ipigott (talk) 07:55, 12 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks!!! :) Lijil (talk) 08:05, 12 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Women in Red March 2024 edit

 
Women in Red | March 2024, Volume 10, Issue 3, Numbers 293, 294, 299, 300, 301


Online events:

Announcements

Tip of the month:

  • When creating a new article, check various spellings, including birth name, married names
    and pseudonyms, to be sure an article doesn't already exist.

Other ways to participate:

  Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:22, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 26 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stuart Moulthrop, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victory Garden.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:07, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]