User talk:Ritchie333/Archive 77

Archive 70

←

Archive 75

Archive 76

Archive 77

Archive 78

Archive 79

Archive 80

Page move

Hi Ritchie. Hope you're well. You may be interested in this Requested Move. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 07:36, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Wtf I need info that I can understand now — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.110.86.103 (talk) 12:16, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

A short political rant

Dear WMF, thankyou for letting me know about the EU copyright changes - it is one of a handful of sane arguments I have heard in favour of Brexit (see here), although the odds of the British government not following with worse copyright laws than the EU are somewhat slim. Unfortunately my MEP is Nigel Farage who I wouldn't trust to go and do the shopping for me, let alone anything else. All he will do is shout "well that's why we should leave the EU" in a loud ranty voice, as per usual. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 09:52, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Foxtrot (album)

The article Foxtrot (album) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Foxtrot (album) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Anarchyte -- Anarchyte (talk) 10:20, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

@Anarchyte: I have been away for a few days but will hopefully get round to looking at it this evening. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 09:55, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Sure! There's no rush, the review isn't going anywhere. Cheers, Anarchyte (work | talk) 09:57, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Foxtrot (album)

The article Foxtrot (album) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Foxtrot (album) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Anarchyte -- Anarchyte (talk) 12:01, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Email notification

So I just got this notification from Wikipedia say that Ritchie333 mentioned me and it reads "You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for..." Followed by the button marked "View Mention." If somebody is trying to break my habit of just deleting these on sight... that one worked. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:52, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

You got an email notification for that? Bizarre. Anyway, as soon as TheOldJacobite says something approximating "oh yeah, hit the revert button too many times, should've left it, oops" I will unblock. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 16:10, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

It was good for a laugh. No need for coffee this morning. -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:13, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

"Professional" Admin-type query...

Ritchie333, do you think this demonstrates a true WP:PRIMARYTOPIC here? Or is this a WP:NOPRIMARY situation?... Just curious. TIA. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:08, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Without looking at any dispute that led to this query, in my personal opinion I don't see a primary topic there. In general, pageviews alone don't really establish a definitive answer, Google news / book searches and informed discussion tend to be required as well to cement an argument, but in this case I would be surprised if the answer was different. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 19:15, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

No dispute – I just stumbled across this... Based on what you say, I'll give some thought about opening a formal WP:RM here... Thanks! --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:22, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Writing song articles

"In my time of drying....."

Hi, I'd like to improve Fool in the Rain and perhaps get it to GA-class, but I've never written a song article before. I spent an hour or so trying to find sources and this is what I found. I've been having trouble finding sources for the background and recording section, would you happen to know of any good places to look? Also, where do I find chart positions and track listings? I'm aware I can go to each individual chart's website and look through their archives, but is there an easier way? Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:45, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

I'm not a massive Zep fan (unfortunately Page and Bonham's talents in particular have been diluted by about 8 billion rock musicans copying them) nor an expert on Zep sources, as I have only one, but it seems to be a good one. Also, In Through The Out Door is probably their only album that's a bit "meh", in my view. Yesterday, I discovered I still had a copy of Dave Lewis' Led Zeppelin - A Celebration tucked away, that I assumed I had thrown out years ago. It's a pretty good factual book for just about everything up to 1990 and is written by a certified band expert who edited the Tight But Loose fanzine. There's a Google Books preview here. It includes a few pages documenting the 1978 Polar Studios sessions that produced In Through The Out Door. There's a follow-up book, "The Tight But Loose Files" printed in 2010. I can't find any official band endorsement of Lewis' work, but there seems to be a general consensus that he's the most reliable source going. Certainly, his research is based on contemporary interviews and listening to studio leaks of recording chat, so it's likely to be more reliable than the distant memories of the band themselves. Avoid "Hammer of the Gods" and anything to do with Richard Cole like the plague - they might be an entertaining read, but only if you force yourself to think that nothing in those books is factually accurate. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 12:21, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

@Anarchyte: Oh, regarding chart positions and sources, ask Dan56 or Binksternet; I tend to find when I turn up to an article to improve it that one or the other of those two has got those sort of things in order. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 23:39, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the help! I agree that In Through The Out Door wasn't the best, with Fool in the Rain being the only song I actively seek out. The Google Books preview for Led Zeppelin: The 'Tight But Loose' Files and Led Zeppelin: A Celebration look quite expansive and hopefully they'll contain some background information (though I may end up combining everything into one section). I'll reach out to Dan56 or Binksternet when I get to that bit of the article. Cheers, Anarchyte (work | talk) 05:22, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

There is a defunct project Wikipedia:WikiProject Led Zeppelin. Rather than creating another mini-project to do all the Zeppelin albums (which is probably easier than doing the Genesis ones, now I think about it), I could just reactivate this one. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 14:32, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

G4?

Is Cargo (2018 film) eligible for G4 deletion, based on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/(Cargo) (2017 film)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Calton (talk • contribs) 13:15, July 5, 2018 (UTC)

I cross-checked the revision currently at AfD and the revision previously deleted, and aside from 2017 / 2018 as the year, they are pretty much substantially identical, so yes I consider it a G4 and have done the necessary. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} : 2:19 pm, Today (UTC+1)

Yes. And please sign your posts with ~~~~ :) —SerialNumber54129 ^{paranoia /cheap sh*t room} 13:19, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. And sorry, I was posting from a tablet and missed that. --Calton | Talk 23:29, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Np Calton, replying you on my talk too  ;) —SerialNumber54129 ^{paranoia /cheap sh*t room} 05:23, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia:CLUSTERFUCK listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:CLUSTERFUCK. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:CLUSTERFUCK redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 14:01, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Alright, point taken. I've nuked it. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 14:02, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Physical Graffiti, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages New York and Roy Harper (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

I think describing Roy Harper as merely a "singer" is disingenuous. I saw him in concert around 2002-3 (I forget) and he was the first person I saw to really lay into Tony Blair and explain why the power was going to his head and he was going to start a war somewhere. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 09:46, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

And here's how Tony deals with Physical Graffiti, you blinkin yob!! Martinevans123 (talk) 14:53, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/Dhonimahi, blocked for test edits

Hello. They're not test edits, they're spamming a telephone number ((Redacted)), and it's being repeatedly done by multiple throw away accounts (Petersam1212 (talk · contribs) is another, still unblocked, one}, so you might want to upp it to indef. The same number is being spammed not only as normal numerals but also as special characters (like the ones added by Dhonimahi), and with the letter O instead of a zero, to make it harder to search for. I don't know what the telephone number leads to, but a quick search on Google shows that it's being done on multiple websites, not only WP, usually adding the number with a claim about going to the telephone support of whatever company they're adding the number to... - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 15:20, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Got it, both indeffed and hurled through the door with a notice not to let it hit them on the way out. "I don't know what the telephone number leads to" I remember that number, I think you get a voice at the other end, and then you say that you want to swap your collection of Beano comics for an equivalent set of The Dandy, with a few copies of Whizzer and Chips thrown in. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 15:26, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

I found one more unblocked such account, Gufycomposer (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), who was last active two days ago, plus one that was blocked by another admin yesterday, Vijayverma007 (talk · contribs), showing that it's a whole sock farm. Gufycomposer has also produced a declined promotional draft, named Draft:Gufy, about a non-notable Indian composer, so I think what we're seeing is an Indian paid editing farm... - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 16:58, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Oh great, an Indian paid editing farm ... don't these guys ever think about giving it up as a bad job and going into plumbing or something? Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 17:04, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Physical Graffiti

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Physical Graffiti you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 12:40, 7 July 2018 (UTC)

Music and....

Since you seem to take an active interest in musicians et al, can you please find some good sources for Liondub? Regards,∯WBG^converse 10:01, 8 July 2018 (UTC)

Oh lawd, I'm afraid I'm not really "up" on anything released in about the last 40 years (unless I'm on it), I'm afraid :-/ Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 23:37, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

1922 Committee

Stop it, it's silly!

Have got their 48 letters. You heard it here first  :) 16:17, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

I am so taking Friday off and going to the march. I shouted "fuck off, Trump" at the People's Vote march in Parliament Square but nobody noticed. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 16:21, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

You're doubting Robert Peston? Surely not.--Pawnkingthree (talk) 16:23, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

I am reliably informed that an anagram of Dominic Raab is "mid air bacon". A more appropriate reference to airborne pigs could not be made up! Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 16:27, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

"Women PMs... Know Your Limits!!": [2] Martinevans123 (talk) 22:29, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Staple, Kent

It's important to have a staple diet.

Slow IP edit war here (over what WP:OR I'm not sure). May require some Admin intervention before too long. Many thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:23, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

I'll keep an eye out. Incredibly, staplegun is a redlink. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 22:27, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Yes, you may have to make do with some of these. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:33, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Attack

I’ll help deleting horrible user pages once in a while. Have a Good Day ARMcgrath (talk) 00:08, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

I may have the body of a weak and feeble middle aged geek, but I have the heart and stomach of a 14-ton elephant. In a bad mood. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 00:15, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Aren’t most of us in a bad mood reporting users for their stupid shenanigans ARMcgrath (talk) 00:19, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Best thing to do is ignore it and go and work on an article somewhere. As you may have noticed, I'm blitzing through all the Led Zeppelin articles this week, cleaning them into shape and putting proper sourcing in place. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 00:23, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks I’m trying to put Raz Cues Page back together. BTW I’m friends with him it’s pretty interesting on how it’ll turn out ARMcgrath (talk) 00:26, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Europe '72

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Europe '72 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 11:40, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Nice going...this album is a favorite of mine. Vanamonde (talk) 11:46, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

It's my favourite Dead album, perfect soundtrack for chilling out on a summer's day and doing sod all. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 11:47, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

ANI question

Hi Ritchie,

I have two questions for you. If I have worked on a section at ANI, like Disruption to Aszure Barton or User:Erescholar potential heavy bias in editing Eritrea related pages, no administrators weighed-in in awhile or at all, and there's nothing more that needs to be done, can I just archive it off. Or, is this like closurers that someone else needs to do it?

I've kind of enjoyed working some on the ANI page - it seems my niche is addressing incidents that aren't getting addressed by admins. Well, generally anyway. But don't want to wear out my welcome. Any pointers about things I should do differently?–CaroleHenson (talk) 15:42, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Usually, it's best for an admin to close threads, but non-admins can with good judgement. You can close one if you think it's going to be more disruptive than keeping it open - let's say two editors are arguing, no admin feels action is warranted, and there's a general lack of WP:STICK-dropping happening. That's a good time to close it. Otherwise, I personally think you can just wait until the thread disappears off the active list into the archives. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 16:17, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Ok, thanks!–CaroleHenson (talk) 16:22, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

ANI

"Never mind, I should not have started that in the first place."

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding the whole Kempner Function debacle. RandNetter96 (Talk) (Contributions) 21:32, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Never mind, I should not have started that in the first place. RandNetter96 (Talk) (Contributions) 17:42, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

"It's comin' 'ome"?

So, after Waistcoat Wednesday and all this "The boys done us proud" mularkey.... have they actually realised they've still got another game to play?? Will it be another waste of time or just a rather tame re-run of recent events?? -- Sheepskin jacket 123 (Jumpers for goalposts, you know, isn't it) 20:31, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

I'm afraid I don't actually have a television and haven't watched any football match anywhere in about 15 years. I'm not a fan of Russia with Putin in charge and I don't like the racist undertones present in English nationalism (which given my mum isn't English, is kind of understandable I guess). (It's only because I caught the front page of The Sun in the shop today that I actually know what you're talking about!) I've just been busy writing articles, mostly of the Led Zeppelin variety this past week. Sorry if that makes me a bit of a grump. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 20:39, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

No, au contraire, I think that makes you refreshingly New Wave. Although, sadly, you seem to be right about the "1922 Committee on tour". Martinevans123 (talk) 20:46, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Regarding Sarah Close

Did you see [3]? Also, could you please put sources into the article? Thanks, RandNetter96 (Talk) (Contributions) 00:11, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Yes, I have fixed up the article. It is not hard to verify that Sarah Close has a huge following on YouTube, has had a number one chart hit, and has played on the same bill as Justin Bieber at Hyde Park. I, meanwhile, have been playing music since before she was born and have achieved none of these things, so I say - fair play to her and I'm pleased she's got a strong grassroots following.

That AfD and template job on a new user whose only crime was to be one of the million plus fans of this musician was a completely boneheaded and reckless thing to do. If you read the discussions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, you will notice we have difficulty attracting women editors, and you've just done an excellent job in scaring one away this evening. I am regretting calling for an unblock now, and fear you'll probably be blocked again in a few days by somebody else. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 00:38, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) I have wondered that myself, RandNetter. It seems that your edits are focused on an over-zealous need to find fault. Have you thought about working on improving articles or creating articles, by chance? Or, joining a WP:Wikiprojects of particular interest to you and see what needs to be done there? Often projects have lists of articles that need to be improved, and often interesting conversations on the talk page. A thought anyway.–CaroleHenson (talk) 01:00, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Reply

Thank you for improving the article. I found their contribution through the recent changes feed and noticed their user. Thinking that that was an inappropriate username, I reported them. If you think that their contributions were valid, feel free to revert me.

Any evidence of said editor's gender? I support said editor's changes to the article now, but I am trying to do the right thing here. RandNetter96 (Talk) (Contributions) 00:45, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

I have also welcomed them on their talk page and struck through some of my comments. RandNetter96 (Talk) (Contributions) 00:51, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

For those playing along at home, RandNetter96 has admitted to being a sockpuppet of ItsLassieTime. I believe Montanabw is familiar with them. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 12:14, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks

Just wanted to say that I appreciate your calm good-naturedness through this ridiculous debacle. --2601:142:3:F83A:2836:5723:BC35:E4C6 (talk) 22:48, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

You're welcome. I was going to finish off my work on Led Zeppelin IV tonight (it still has a few fact tags and needs re-reading and copyediting) with the view of maybe taking it to GA review in the next day or two - now I've wasted my evening on this. Still, I have learned about the Kempner function - it does look like the sort of thing Numberphile would cover in time, but not yet. (Would be interested to hear your views on the 1+2+3+ ..... = -1/12 claim, which just looks bonkers). Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 22:52, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks again. I have never been a big watcher of YouTube videos (about math or anything else); some of Vi Hart's stuff makes me think I should, and I recently enjoyed this one. About -1/12: my feeling is that it's all about what the meaning of the word "is" is. If I tell you that there's a method (one of many) that assigns a real number to sequences of real numbers and has the properties that

• if a + b + c + ... converges, then it assigns that value to the sequence (a, b, c, ...), and
• it assigns the value -1/12 to the sequence (1, 2, 3, 4, ...),

I don't think it sounds quite as mysterious. It's only (?) the choice to use the symbol "=" to denote this operation that causes any unease. I quite like the section of our article on the subject that discusses the failure of a stable, linear summation method to sum this series (even though it's never been as well-sourced as it should be) -- in some sense, what it says is that if you want to assign a sum to this series, you had better be willing to give up something that feels natural. What do you think? --2601:142:3:F83A:2836:5723:BC35:E4C6 (talk) 01:03, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

That ties up with something I read about a long time ago. If you start with integers and try and divide 3 into 1; you can't use another integer to represent that, so you "pretend" you can do it and call it ⅓. Later on you discover you can't get the square root of -1, so you use complex numbers to "pretend" you can. And that seems to be the similar case here - you can't really sum a divergent infinite series, so you reinvent the ground rules so you can. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 10:04, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Interesting analogy! I wouldn't have thought of it, for the following reason: I think it's pretty clear that none of these other summation techniques will rise to the level of ubiquity that, say, the rational numbers or complex numbers have. Maybe this is because there is no single one of them that is obviously "right", or maybe it's because the particular question they address is just less central to mathematical thought than "what is a number?". But certainly this kind of broadening of context is one of the main ways in which mathematics has developed over the last century or two. --2601:142:3:F83A:355E:CA3A:18ED:2F33 (talk) 14:50, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Speaking of which, any thoughts on what to do about this and this? I've never seen anyone get this worked up and not already be blocked before. --2601:142:3:F83A:2836:5723:BC35:E4C6 (talk) 22:51, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

I can't remember if userpages containing lists of editors or edits they don't like is instantly speedable - I recall an admin had a list about four months ago (I know because I was on it) and got into serious trouble over it. It's definitely frowned on. I think RandNetter96 is getting the ANI thread he deserves, and if he doesn't take my advice of "log off and do something else", then more fool him. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 22:55, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Umm, I don't mean to hijack or cause further disruption, but can you take a look at these? They do not appear to be constructive in nature. User:RandNetter96/Reports/Noticeboards and User:RandNetter96/Reports — Mr X ^☎️ 23:22, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Indeffed. I'd rather another admin did it, but I seem to be the only one looking at this dispute right now. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 23:27, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for looking at that and taking action on the clear defiance of the warning that you provided. — Mr X ^☎️ 23:30, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

You did an excellent job with a very trying situation. I don't think I have ever seen anything quite like it here at WP.–CaroleHenson (talk) 23:38, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

The sad thing is, I really do think that Numberphile is a great YouTube channel, it's fun and educational, and I've learned loads of things about maths on it. He should have taken that advice. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 23:44, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Absolutely. Things might have turned out differently for him if he had.–CaroleHenson (talk) 23:48, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Led Zeppelin IV

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Led Zeppelin IV you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ojorojo -- Ojorojo (talk) 15:00, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

I thought I'd try something different. See if my mark up is helpful @ User:Ojorojo/Sandbox3: [italicizied]=example for other wording, [regular]=comment. —Ojorojo (talk) 21:18, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Like buses, you wait ages for a GA review, then three come along at once during a busy weekend :-/ I'll have a look in the next day or two, hopefully. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 12:10, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

No hurry. I'll hold off until you've had a look at what I've done so far. —Ojorojo (talk) 15:19, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

accidental rollback

Heads up, I fat-fingered the rollback button on your edit to Tony's talk page just now. I have reverted myself. Sorry! ♠PMC♠ (talk) 16:26, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

@Premeditated Chaos: I saw the funny side. I don't know if this is of interest, but in User:Ritchie333/common.css I have turned the rollback button off as I never use it. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 16:28, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

I appreciate it; I use it (properly) from time to time though so I think I'll hang on to it. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 16:36, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

On the occasions I have actually wanted to revert multiple edits en-masse, I go to the history, pull up the revision I want to go back to, click "Edit", then "Save". It's "fat finger friendly" and allows you to preview your changes with a diff to the current revision. Works for me, at least. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 16:44, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Uhh... I'm familiar with how to revert edits manually, but thanks for explaining it to me anyway. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 17:03, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

"Naked men are gratuitous."
And funny... [1]

Another pro-tip: Hitting the "Publish changes" button when you're done ensures that your changes stick around for other people to see! ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 19:22, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

While we're on the subject, as you can see in this thread, I don't think the Sunday Sport can be considered a reliable source for BLPs. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 19:23, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

And you would be completely wrong about that. I'm heading to RSN right now to sort this out and possibly ANI to get you desysopped and indeffed for besmirching the reputation of the venearealvenerable Sunday Sport. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 19:28, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Hang on, surely defending gratuitous pictures of naked women is a Commons activity..... Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 19:29, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

"Two from the top please, Carol"

Only if they're attractive. Attractiveness == Encyclopedic value. And only women. Naked men are gratuitous. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 19:46, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

Hey whoa slow down, some of us like looking at naked men and would like to interject that they are just as encyclopedic as naked women. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:12, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

I take it you have not had the experience of my youngest son running stark naked around the house having been in the shower, simply because he's too lazy to get dressed. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 22:14, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

I thankfully have not; I suspect if I had, we might be having this conversation through lawyers and not your talk page. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:35, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

"we might be having this conversation through lawyers". I knew it - LEGAL THREATS! LEGAL THREATS! BAN! Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 11:41, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

A reminder that Hotties are always notable. Or, well, they were until 2014. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 01:11, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

A shame that was deleted - I found it funny. If it's discriminating against anyone, it's the stereotypical bedroom geek's narrow-minded view of the world. I do admit that I think Hannah Fry's rather nice looking and has the sexiest talking voice since Sally Boazman. However, I also admire that she's managed to get a whole demographic of people (teenage girls who like shopping) interested in mathematics, and outlined the topic in such a way that it seems relevant to their lives and affects them in ways they can relate to. It is possible to have both opinions! Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 11:57, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

And she wouldn't be the first lady number-cruncher to turn a man's head. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:53, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

I miss Richard Whiteley.[4] Come to think of it, I don't think I've seen Countdown since he died, it's just not the same.Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 19:22, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

A grilled third patty

Never one to encourage third-patty YouTube copyvio linking, I'd never suggest "Countdown wankers outtake" is worth a replay. (But it has been there nearly 12 years now). Martinevans123 (talk) 19:47, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

• I saw the comment above and thought "This looks like a job for me!" so I went ahead and brought this along with a reminder that fair use is not copyvio, and linking is not copying. ᛗᛁᛟᛚᚾᛁᚱPants Tell me all about it. 20:44, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Somewhere on YouTube there is the complete 1-hour "Gotcha" episode of Countdown where Whiteley fell for one practical joke after another, hook line and sinker. But he took it in the good grace and spirit intended. What a great chap. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 20:47, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

• Credit where credit is due: I stole someone's patty image (above) for use here [5] (be sure to scroll down to the fourth image). EEng 20:15, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

• Jeez, EEng, I feel I'm now being held to ransom. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:53, 14 July 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Physical Graffiti

The article Physical Graffiti you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Physical Graffiti for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FunkMonk -- FunkMonk (talk) 14:21, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Europe '72

The article Europe '72 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Europe '72 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 19:00, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Admin's Barnstar
	Sometimes on this place you're damned if you do and you're damned if you don't!, Just wanted to say thanks for taking that to ANI and atleast trying to come up with a solution, Anyway happy editing, –Davey2010Talk 15:59, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

It's never pleasant doing this stuff - I assume this is for making a valiant attempt at stopping DF from being blocked and failing. It's not an indefinite block, so he will be back (assuming he wants to do so). Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 16:18, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

Exactly, As I said on his talkpage a months block might do them the world of good, Ah well just wanted to say thanks for atleast trying, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 16:37, 16 July 2018 (UTC)