User talk:PresN/Archive 21
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:PresN. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 15 | ← | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | → | Archive 25 |
Welcome to the 2019 WikiCup!
Hello and Happy New Year!
Welcome to the 2019 WikiCup, the competition begins today. If you have already joined, your submission page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and we will set up your submissions page. One important rule to remember is that only content on which you have completed significant work during 2019, and which you have nominated this year, is eligible for points in the competition, the judges will be checking! Any questions should be directed to one of the judges, or left on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will make it to round 2. Good luck! The judges for the WikiCup are Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email), Vanamonde93 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:14, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2018).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- There are a number of new or changed speedy deletion criteria, each previously part of WP:CSD#G6:
- G14 (new): Disambiguation pages that disambiguate only zero or one existing pages are now covered under the new G14 criterion (discussion). This is {{db-disambig}}; the text is unchanged and candidates may be found in Category:Candidates for speedy deletion as unnecessary disambiguation pages.
- R4 (new): Redirects in the file namespace (and no file links) that have the same name as a file or redirect at Commons are now covered under the new R4 criterion (discussion). This is {{db-redircom}}; the text is unchanged.
- G13 (expanded): Userspace drafts containing only the default Article Wizard text are now covered under G13 along with other drafts (discussion). Such blank drafts are now eligible after six months rather than one year, and taggers continue to use {{db-blankdraft}}.
- The Wikimedia Foundation now requires all interface administrators to enable two-factor authentication.
- Members of the Bot Approvals Group (BAG) are now subject to an activity requirement. After two years without any bot-related activity (e.g. operating a bot, posting on a bot-related talk page), BAG members will be retired from BAG following a one-week notice.
Technical news
- Starting on December 13, the Wikimedia Foundation security team implemented new password policy and requirements. Privileged accounts (administrators, bureaucrats, checkusers, oversighters, interface administrators, bots, edit filter managers/helpers, template editors, et al.) must have a password at least 10 characters in length. All accounts must have a password:
- At least 8 characters in length
- Not in the 100,000 most popular passwords (defined by the Password Blacklist library)
- Different from their username
- User accounts not meeting these requirements will be prompted to update their password accordingly. More information is available on MediaWiki.org.
- Blocked administrators may now block the administrator that blocked them. This was done to mitigate the possibility that a compromised administrator account would block all other active administrators, complementing the removal of the ability to unblock oneself outside of self-imposed blocks. A request for comment is currently in progress to determine whether the blocking policy should be updated regarding this change.
- {{Copyvio-revdel}} now has a link to open the history with the RevDel checkboxes already filled in.
Arbitration
- Following the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: AGK, Courcelles, GorillaWarfare, Joe Roe, Mkdw, SilkTork.
Miscellaneous
- Accounts continue to be compromised on a regular basis. Evidence shows this is entirely due to the accounts having the same password that was used on another website that suffered a data breach. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately.
- Around 22% of admins have enabled two-factor authentication, up from 20% in June 2018. If you haven't already enabled it, please consider doing so. Regardless of whether you use 2FA, please practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.
Your GA nomination of Star Trek (1971 video game)
The article Star Trek (1971 video game) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Star Trek (1971 video game) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Indrian -- Indrian (talk) 18:20, 7 January 2019 (UTC)
Sketch vs final look
Hello, how are you doing. I have been working in the visual novel character Shirou Emiya and found a sketch about his early look in a spinoff here. However, the final look ended up being quite different as you can see here or here when the spinoff was animated. The author talks a bit about why he changed the design but I don't know what image takes more priority or if it is possible to put both looks. Any suggestion? Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 15:40, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Tintor: I think the actual game model would take priority; it doesn't seem that different to me though? Just missing the skintight undershirt. --PresN 16:11, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
- I see. Thanks for the response.Tintor2 (talk) 16:18, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Star Trek (1971 video game)
The article Star Trek (1971 video game) you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Star Trek (1971 video game) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Indrian -- Indrian (talk) 15:43, 10 January 2019 (UTC)
Former GA/FAs
Hiya! Do you know whether there is some place that lists former GAs/FAs in a topic area? I vaguely recalled WP:VG/GA/FA compiling these but it appears not. czar 18:37, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Czar: I took them out some time ago as they are obviously not good content. :^) For everything else, there's the page history which should be able to show you everything disqualified since whatever the date was I nixed everything. --Izno (talk) 21:49, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
- Found it—thanks! czar 22:01, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's accurate-ish up till then, I think it didn't include former GAs where the article no longer existed (merged/redirected). And yeah, Izno decided we didn't need a wall of shame, and I agreed as it didn't seem to be motivating anyone to regain GA/FA status for them. --PresN 03:50, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
- Which isn't to suggest we shouldn't keep such a wall around to inform what walls looks like, just that we shouldn't put the wall there. :^) --Izno (talk) 04:45, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's accurate-ish up till then, I think it didn't include former GAs where the article no longer existed (merged/redirected). And yeah, Izno decided we didn't need a wall of shame, and I agreed as it didn't seem to be motivating anyone to regain GA/FA status for them. --PresN 03:50, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
- Found it—thanks! czar 22:01, 12 January 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Hunt the Wumpus
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hunt the Wumpus you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CelestialWeevil -- CelestialWeevil (talk) 19:00, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Hunt the Wumpus
The article Hunt the Wumpus you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Hunt the Wumpus for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CelestialWeevil -- CelestialWeevil (talk) 15:20, 15 January 2019 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Hunt the Wumpus
The article Hunt the Wumpus you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hunt the Wumpus for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of CelestialWeevil -- CelestialWeevil (talk) 04:41, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
TFL notification – February 2019
Hi, PresN. I'm just posting to let you know that List of games by Firaxis Games – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for February 22. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 02:23, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
New article assessment list bot
Not sure if you're tabulating these somewhere, but wanted to register a vote for making your "new WikiProject article" list generator/script (from the 1.0 assessment data, right?) into a bot. I think it could be really valuable for other WikiProjects, on par with the Article Alerts bot. It would also help to turn WikiProject talk pages into subject-area noticeboards (which, imo, is their inevitable future). czar 01:11, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- [1]
feature requests are appreciated
Came back to post this again. :) Such a bot would be extremely valuable for breathing life/regularity into other WikiProjects, a key step towards making them into more of topic-based noticeboards. czar 13:03, 31 August 2019 (UTC)- @Czar: Added to the feature list! There's still a few manual interventions I have to make each time that need to be fixed, plus I need to learn how to make wikibots, but it's a good goal! --PresN 18:40, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
Full Sail University
Thanks for weighing in on the esports arena discussion. I'm hoping the article will be updated soon. I've also submitted a request to re-add mention of the campus' size here, if you're interested to share your thoughts. Thanks, Inkian Jason (talk) 18:56, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- Do you recommend I submit your proposed wording as a compromise in a new edit request, or should I see if Justlettersandnumbers will reply to your comment? I'm not sure they will reply unprompted, but I'm still looking to update the article. Inkian Jason (talk) 16:56, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Hello again! I posted this edit request nearly 3 weeks ago and I'm struggling to get an editor to update the article even after posting multiple requests for help at related WikiProjects. Might you have a moment to take a look? Inkian Jason (talk) 16:24, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking a look. I've replied on the article's talk page. There are other press releases confirming the collaboration as well, but my goal was just to confirm current use. Inkian Jason (talk) 17:38, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for updating the article. On the talk page, I noted the duplicate appearance of "partnered" in the content you added. I've also submitted another request here, if you're willing to review. Inkian Jason (talk) 19:10, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Hi again. I am struggling to get an editor to review my request at Talk:Full_Sail_University#Awards. Since you've helped before, I thought I'd reach out to see if you had a moment to take a look. If not, I understand, but thanks for your consideration. Inkian Jason (talk) 15:15, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I know some editors don't have notifications turned on, so I wanted to make sure you saw this update regarding the esports arena at Full Sail. Are you willing to review this request, or shall I try to find another editor to take a look? Thanks so much, Inkian Jason (talk) 15:05, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for your help. I've submitted a simple (and I believe final, at least for now) update request here if you have another moment. Inkian Jason (talk) 15:49, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Six years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:14, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Thank you today for Aquaria (video game)! - DYK Der Ring in Minden? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:05, 7 December 2019 (UTC)
... seven years now --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:04, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – February 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2019).
Administrator changes
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment is currently open to reevaluate the activity requirements for administrators.
- Administrators who are blocked have the technical ability to block the administrator who blocked their own account. A recent request for comment has amended the blocking policy to clarify that this ability should only be used in exceptional circumstances, such as account compromises, where there is a clear and immediate need.
- A request for comment closed with a consensus in favor of deprecating The Sun as a permissible reference, and creating an edit filter to warn users who attempt to cite it.
Technical news
- A discussion regarding an overhaul of the format and appearance of Wikipedia:Requests for page protection is in progress (permalink). The proposed changes will make it easier to create requests for those who are not using Twinkle. The workflow for administrators at this venue will largely be unchanged. Additionally, there are plans to archive requests similar to how it is done at WP:PERM, where historical records are kept so that prior requests can more easily be searched for.
Miscellaneous
- Voting in the 2019 Steward elections will begin on 08 February 2019, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 28 February 2019, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- A new IRC bot is available that allows you to subscribe to notifications when specific filters are tripped. This requires that your IRC handle be identified.
Turochamp
I see you have turned to one of the earliest known computer programs to give it your usual solid treatment. Two things you should know from sources you have not made use of yet. First, in Alan M. Turing, a biography written by Turing's own mother, Donald Michie describes creating an algorithm called Machiavelli to challenge Turochamp. Second, the definitive Turing biography, Alan Turing: The Enigma has more detail on the relationship between Turochamp and Machiavelli. As can be pieced together from letters reproduced in the book, Turing and Champernowne did not fully develop Turochamp until after learning that Michie had created Machiavelli. In the letter reproduced on page 489 and dated 18 September 1948, Turing explicitly states he has not written down a definitive version of Turochamp yet and that he was aware of the Machiavelli program. He further states his plan to finish Turochamp and then implement both programs on a computer to have them duke it out. You will also note reference to earlier discussions with Jack Good about chess. These are described in another part of the book. Basically, Turing and Good first explored the theory behind a chess-playing machine in 1941, though they produced to code at that time.
So to summarize the info in the two books: Turing first discussed a chess program with Jack Good in 1941 and came up with the concept of using decision trees and minimaxing at that time, but did not actually create a program. Then, in late sumemr 1948, Turing and Champernowne hashed out a program in some detail called Turochamp. but did not finish it. Finally, Donald Michie and Shaun Wylie learned of Turochamp and were inspired to create their own program called Machiavelli, which in turn inspired Turing to finish Turochamp sometime after 18 September 1948 so that he could implement both programs on a computer to play against each other. Hope that helps. Indrian (talk) 21:47, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Indrian: Thanks, that helps a lot! I knew of Machiavelli, because I'm currently just pulling information from the French wikipedia article and it mentions the rivalry, but I haven't gone looking for sources myself so I did not know that it was such an impetus for Turochamp. Seems like there's a lot of reworking of the history section that needs to happen! --PresN 01:38, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Analysis of relationships
Hi, how are you doing? As a fellow user copyedited the article Shirou Emiya, he removed an analysis between two artists that involved his relationships with three heroines from the visual novel. You can check it in the talk page. However, another user expressed the possibility of readding the commentary about Shirou's relationships but not exactly sure were? Any idea about it? Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 16:03, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- A separate section just for the writers analyzing the relationships feels like overkill; I'd leave it in the creation section, but edit it to be shorter. --PresN 03:50, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Outstanding user page
|
The Userpage Barnstar | |
| I was browsing the list of Barnstars searching for the best choice of award to give to another user, when I read the description for this and instantly thought of you. I think the design of your page is exceptionally elegant, with a beautiful and functional design. Neuroxic (talk) 04:44, 17 February 2019 (UTC) |
Sales data restored
I have restored the sales data on this page. I agree with you about restoring sales column. so per WP:BEBOLD, I've restored sale data. thank you for your hard work on sales data --Misconceptions2 (talk) 22:55, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Square_Enix_video_game_franchises
Dissident
Why did you allow dissident93 to remove the sales data you added in the way he did. There was no consensus. He should have kept status quo then discuss. Now it may lead to him engaging in a revert war. --Misconceptions2 (talk) 23:36, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
I'm really not seeing it, and text searches for "Prince" and "eat your" both produce no results in either the linked version or the archived version of the page. Is it in a hidden sidebar or something?--Martin IIIa (talk) 15:22, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Martin IIIa: It's on page 3 of the article (out of 4) - you have to click "next page" at the bottom. --PresN 17:54, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
WikiCup 2019 March newsletter
And so ends the first round of the competition. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2. With 56 contestants qualifying, each group in Round 2 contains seven contestants, with the two leaders from each group due to qualify for Round 3 as well as the top sixteen remaining contestants.
Our top scorers in Round 1 were:
L293D, a WikiCup newcomer, led the field with ten good articles on submarines for a total of 357 points.
Adam Cuerden, a WikiCup veteran, came next with 274 points, mostly from eight featured pictures, restorations of artwork.
MPJ-DK, a wrestling enthusiast, was in third place with 263 points, garnered from a featured list, five good articles, two DYKs and four GARs.- Usernameunique came next at 243, with a featured article and a good article, both on ancient helmets.
Squeamish Ossifrage was in joint fifth place with 224 points, mostly garnered from bringing the 1937 Fox vault fire to featured article status.
Ed! was also on 224, with an amazing number of good article reviews (56 actually).
These contestants, like all the others, now have to start scoring points again from scratch. Between them, contestants completed reviews on 143 good articles, one hundred more than the number of good articles they claimed for, thus making a substantial dent in the review backlog. Well done all!
Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.
If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk).
Administrators' newsletter – March 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2019).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- The RfC on administrator activity requirements failed to reach consensus for any proposal.
- Following discussions at the Bureaucrats' noticeboard and Wikipedia talk:Administrators, an earlier change to the restoration of adminship policy was reverted. If requested, bureaucrats will not restore administrator permissions removed due to inactivity if there have been five years without a logged administrator action; this "five year rule" does not apply to permissions removed voluntarily.
Technical news
- A new tool is available to help determine if a given IP is an open proxy/VPN/webhost/compromised host.
Arbitration
- The Arbitration Committee announced two new OTRS queues. Both are meant solely for cases involving private information; other cases will continue to be handled at the appropriate venues (e.g., WP:COIN or WP:SPI).
- paid-en-wp
wikipedia.org has been set up to receive private evidence related to abusive paid editing. - checkuser-en-wp wikipedia.org has been set up to receive private requests for CheckUser. For instance, requests for IP block exemption for anonymous proxy editing should now be sent to this address instead of the functionaries-en list.
- paid-en-wp
- The Arbitration Committee announced two new OTRS queues. Both are meant solely for cases involving private information; other cases will continue to be handled at the appropriate venues (e.g., WP:COIN or WP:SPI).
Miscellaneous
- Following the 2019 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: Base, Einsbor, Jon Kolbert, Schniggendiller, and Wim b.
Hey, thanks for getting it to GA. I had the urge to do it myself while I was talking to my girlfriend about things, and let out an audible 'woah' when I saw it had already been done! - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 01:56, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
- @New Age Retro Hippie: Huh, almost exactly 5 years ago. Yeah, I remember, I never even played the game, I just saw that the article was essentially passing and just needed a poke while you were out. You're welcome! --PresN 02:52, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
FLC
Hey. I was wondering if this FLC has enough input to be promoted (4 supports, all concerns addressed). I actually plan a lengthy wikibreak after this one is promoted, hence bothering, and also since you do source reviews. :)—NØ 22:06, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- @MaranoFan: There's the outstanding alt text comment on the FLC that needs to be addressed, but that's it there; as far as a source review, the sources that link to an ASIN need to be changed- ASIN is the internal Amazon product number, not a standard album identifier. If the record label has an id you can use that (for example, AllMusic claims that the catalog number for Handwritten is 5084871), otherwise it should be excluded. The rest looks fine. --PresN 23:20, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
- I finished replacing the ASINs with catalog numbers. The person who made the comments about the Alt texts changed it themselves, so that’s done too.—NØ 06:08, 26 March 2019 (UTC)
Hey Pres. Would it be possible for you to review the FAC to Deactivators? I'm worried it might fail due to a lack of feedback. GamerPro64 01:07, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – April 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2019).
|
|
|
Technical news
- In Special:Preferences under "Appearance" → "Advanced options", there is now an option to show a confirmation prompt when clicking on a rollback link.
- The Wikimedia Foundation's Community health initiative plans to design and build a new user reporting system to make it easier for people experiencing harassment and other forms of abuse to provide accurate information to the appropriate channel for action to be taken. Please see meta:Community health initiative/User reporting system consultation 2019 to provide your input on this idea.
Arbitration
- The Arbitration Committee clarified that the General 1RR prohibition for Palestine-Israel articles may only be enforced on pages with the {{ARBPIA 1RR editnotice}} edit notice.
Miscellaneous
- Two more administrator accounts were compromised. Evidence has shown that these attacks, like previous incidents, were due to reusing a password that was used on another website that suffered a data breach. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately. All admins are strongly encouraged to enable two-factor authentication, please consider doing so. Please always practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.
- As a reminder, according to WP:NOQUORUM, administrators looking to close or relist an AfD should evaluate a nomination that has received few or no comments as if it were a proposed deletion (PROD) prior to determining whether it should be relisted.
Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games#Sakura Wars
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games#Sakura Wars. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 02:41, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
Music of Sakura Wars
Hello. I'm thinking about creating some pages regarding the music of Sakura Wars, given that we've done Final Fantasy music articles before. I've been working on the series and first game in my sandbox (they are located at User:Sjones23/Music of the Sakura Wars series and User:Sjones23/Music of Sakura Wars). We may need to expand on this with the reception and songs. Care to join forces? Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 02:54, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
TFL notification – May 2019
Hi, PresN. I'm just posting to let you know that Arthur C. Clarke Award – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for May 6. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 21:22, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Turochamp you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Indrian -- Indrian (talk) 21:41, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Mana series
Shin'ichi Kameoka was co-producer in Heroes of Mana. Ishii is NOT ONLY main staff. Various staff including Ishii and Kameoka weren't involve since Heroes of Mana. At least important staff were credited to Special Thanks. Rise of Mana hadn't have previous any Mana staff, because they had already left in Square Enix. See Series credits Windywalk (talk) 16:45, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
- @Windywalk: Yes, Kameoka was credited as a co-producer on Heroes. There are two issues: 1) The infobox lists a single name if possible per field, and only does multiple names if they are all equal; Ishii was credited as producer compared to Kameoka's co-producer, so only Ishii is listed in the infobox. 2) Besides the infobox, the text of the lead summarizes the article. Ishii, besides being the series creator, is mentioned extensively in the development section, so the lead mentioning that this was his final Mana game makes sense (though it should be in the body of the article too). Kameoka is not mentioned at all- he was the co-producer, but no interviews with him or sources about him are used in the article. Additionally, while Ishii created the series, Kameoka was nowhere near as important to the series- he wasn't on FFAdventures, and for Secret of Mana he was the character designer, not the lead artist (who was Hiroo Isono). He's certainly important, but not so important that we need to, out of the blue, mention that this guy who isn't mentioned in any other Mana article hasn't worked on any games in the series since Heroes. So I'm not saying that it's not true that Heroes was Kameoka's last Mana game, or that Rise of Mana didn't use any previous major developers, but I am saying that it's not a major component of Heroes of Mana that needs mentioning in the lead. --PresN 21:55, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Video recommendation
An analysis of early video game journalism and terminology, thought you might find interesting. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fXVWtE80KmU Ben · Salvidrim! ✉ 08:46, 27 April 2019 (UTC)
WikiCup 2019 May newsletter
The second round of the 2019 WikiCup has now finished. Contestants needed to scored 32 points to advance into round 3. Our top four scorers in round 2 all scored over 400 points and were:
Cas Liber (1210), our winner in 2016, with two featured articles and three DYKs. He also made good use of the bonus points available, more than doubling his score by choosing appropriate articles to work on.
Kosack (750), last year's runner up, with an FA, a GA, two FLs, and five DYKs.- Adam Cuerden (480), a WikiCup veteran, with 16 featured pictures, mostly restorations.
Zwerg Nase (461), a seasoned competitor, with a FA, a GA and an ITN item.
Other notable performances were put in by 
Barkeep49 with six GAs, 
Ceranthor, 
Lee Vilenski, and 
Canada Hky, each with seven GARs, and 
MPJ-DK with a seven item GT.
So far contestants have achieved nine featured articles between them and a splendid 80 good articles. Commendably, 227 GARs have been completed during the course of the 2019 WikiCup, so the backlog of articles awaiting GA review has been reduced as a result of contestants' activities. The judges are pleased with the thorough GARs that are being performed, and have hardly had to reject any. As we enter the third round, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Vanamonde (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:46, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:Computer Space flyer.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Computer Space flyer.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the file description page and add the text
{{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}}below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing<your reason>with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable. - On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 21:19, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Computer Space flyer.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Computer Space flyer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 special circular
 |
Administrators must secure their accounts
The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.
|
This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:36, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.
Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.
We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.
For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – May 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2019).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment concluded that creating pages in the portal namespace should be restricted to autoconfirmed users.
- Following a request for comment, the subject-specific notability guideline for pornographic actors and models (WP:PORNBIO) was removed; in its place, editors should consult WP:ENT and WP:GNG.
Technical news
- XTools Admin Stats, a tool to list admins by administrative actions, has been revamped to support more types of log entries such as AbuseFilter changes. Two additional tools have been integrated into it as well: Steward Stats and Patroller Stats.
Arbitration
- In response to the continuing compromise of administrator accounts, the Arbitration Committee passed a motion amending the procedures for return of permissions (diff). In such cases,
the committee will review all available information to determine whether the administrator followed "appropriate personal security practices" before restoring permissions
; administrators found failing to have adequately done sowill not be resysopped automatically
. All current administrators have been notified of this change. - Following a formal ratification process, the arbitration policy has been amended (diff). Specifically, the two-thirds majority required to remove or suspend an arbitrator now excludes (1) the arbitrator facing suspension or removal, and (2) any inactive arbitrator who does not respond within 30 days to attempts to solicit their feedback on the resolution through all known methods of communication.
- In response to the continuing compromise of administrator accounts, the Arbitration Committee passed a motion amending the procedures for return of permissions (diff). In such cases,
Miscellaneous
- A request for comment is currently open to amend the community sanctions procedure to exclude non XfD or CSD deletions.
- A proposal to remove pre-2009 indefinite IP blocks is currently open for discussion.
Sharing the draft proposed page revision
Hi PresN, I'm Kelt Reeves the president of Falcon Northwest. I've been trying to draw an editor's attention to a proposed rewrite I shared on Talk. I thought you might be interested since you created a Good Article rated page on Nimrod, which is a similar topic. Kelt at Falcon (talk) 20:36, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
The article Turochamp you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Turochamp for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Indrian -- Indrian (talk) 21:22, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Hugo Awards
Thanks, I hadn't realised that. Now that I've seen them I think they could all benefit by a similar treatment - I may propose that on the main Hugo Talk page. - Snori (talk) 03:38, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – June 2019
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2019).
Administrator changes
Andonic • Consumed Crustacean • Enigmaman • Euryalus • EWS23 • HereToHelp • Nv8200pa • Peripitus • StringTheory11 • Vejvančický
CheckUser changes
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC seeks to clarify whether WP:OUTING should include information on just the English Wikipedia or any Wikimedia project.
- An RfC on WT:RfA concluded that Requests for adminship and bureaucratship are discussions seeking to build consensus.
- An RfC proposal to make the templates for discussion (TfD) process more like the requested moves (RM) process, i.e. "as a clearinghouse of template discussions", was closed as successful.
Technical news
- The CSD feature of Twinkle now allows admins to notify page creators of deletion if the page had not been tagged. The default behavior matches that of tagging notifications, and replaces the ability to open the user talk page upon deletion. You can customize which criteria receive notifications in your Twinkle preferences: look for Notify page creator when deleting under these criteria.
- Twinkle's d-batch (batch delete) feature now supports deleting subpages (and related redirects and talk pages) of each page. The pages will be listed first but use with caution! The und-batch (batch undelete) option can now also restore talk pages.
Miscellaneous
- The previously discussed unblocking of IP addresses indefinitely-blocked before 2009 was approved and has taken place.
- The 2019 talk pages consultation produced a report for Phase 1 and has entered Phase 2.
Hello.
I'm happy to see you completed this page. I see it is clearly inspired by the french article i wrote. I even found severals sentences i wrote. It is also an evidence the page is based on the french article... The translation make no doubt for me, even the artcile has been re-wrote and remade.
Sad part is i can't find the licence respect and citation of the french article in talk page (at least). Did i missed it ? It seems the Wikipedia licence is not respected. When i use and translate english pages, i cite it : [2] you can check the pages listed on that template that have been tranlated, i.e. .
Regards. --Archimëa (talk) 12:10, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
- Perhaps you should look at this two really interresting pages i wrote and part of history of video games and IA : [3][4]
- It's now a long time i did not write anything about that decade, but i hope i will be abble to write about the arthur samuel's checker program one day (the last i miss)...
- I also wrote about the Nimatron game machine, if you want to take a look at [5]...
- Regards. --Archimëa (talk) 12:24, 9 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Archimëa: I mentioned that I was pulling from the fr article in the page history, but I've now added an attribution template to the talk page. --PresN 10:47, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- ahgrr, i didn't saw you mentionned it in the history page... That's really nice, and i thank you. We can see you remade it by youself, but there are still some sentences ripped from it... thanks...
- Did you see [6][7]. they are candidates for an article maybe one day ? --Archimëa (talk) 10:50, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Archimëa: I mentioned that I was pulling from the fr article in the page history, but I've now added an attribution template to the talk page. --PresN 10:47, 10 June 2019 (UTC)
TFL notification
Hi, PresN. I'm just posting to let you know that List of 3D Realms games – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for July 8. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 21:21, 14 June 2019 (UTC)