User talk:Liance/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Y U DO DIS

YA JUST HAD TO REQUEST FOR SPEEDY DELETION DIDN'T YA? YOU KNOW WHAT? SHAME ON YOU. SHAME ON YOUR COW .NuggetMC (talk) 02:41, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Please see my response on your talk page. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 02:45, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Turkey trot

Please see WP:PAGEMOVE for instructions how move pages. Cut-and-paste moves are disallowed in wikipedia due to our license rules. - üser:Altenmann >t 00:06, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, I gave you wrong link. Since you are not an admin, you have to request a page move; see Wikipedia:Requested moves. - üser:Altenmann >t 01:10, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks, I should have known better than to cut-and-paste move the page. I'm not 100% sure on if the page should be moved that way, so I have left it as a suggestion on the article's talk page. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 01:13, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

App hide

Good Halwala (talk) 02:21, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Emergency Halwala (talk) 02:24, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

I don't quite understand your message; could you please be a bit more specific if you are trying to contact me? Thank you. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 04:46, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

WikiCup 2016 is just around the corner...

Hello everyone, and we would like to wish you all a happy holiday season. As you will probably already know, the 2016 WikiCup begins in the new year; there is still time to sign up. There are some changes we'd like to announce before the competition begins.

After two years of serving as WikiCup judge, User:Miyagawa has stepped down as judge. He deserves great thanks and recognition for his dedication and hard work, and for providing necessary transition for a new group of judges in last year's Cup. Joining Christine (User:Figureskatingfan) and Jason (User:Sturmvogel 66) is Andrew (User:Godot13), a very successful WikiCup competitor and expert in Featured Pictures; he won the two previous competitions. This is a strong judging team, and we anticipate lots of enjoyment and good work coming from our 2016 competitors.

We would also like to announce one change in how this year's WikiCup will be run. In the spirit of sportsmanship, Godot13 and Cwmhiraeth have chosen to limit their participation. See here for the announcement and a complete explanation of why. They and the judges feel that it will make for a more exciting, enjoyable, and productive competition.

The discussions/polls concerning the next competition's rules will be closed soon, and rules changes will be made clear on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring and talk pages. The judges are committed to not repeating the confusion that occurred last year and to ensuring that the new rules are both fair and in the best interests of the competition, which is, first and foremost, about improving Wikipedia.

If you have any questions or concerns, the judges can be reached on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, on their talk pages, or by email. We hope you will all join us in trying to make the 2015 WikiCup the most productive and enjoyable yet. You are receiving this message because you are listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Figureskatingfan (talk), and Godot13 (talk).--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Norumbega

I've mentioned the 2nd removal of the Davistown link on the article's talk page. I note that you used an edit summary to explain one deletion but not this one. I've also taken it to WP:ELN. Doug Weller (talk) 07:16, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2016!!!

Hello Liance, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2016. Happy editing, Altamel (talk) 03:56, 23 December 2015 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

WikiCup 2016: Game On!

We are about to enter the second week of the 2016 WikiCup. The most recent player to sign up brings the current total to 101 contestants. Signups close on 5 February. If you’re interested, you can join this year's WikiCup here.

We are aware that in some areas the scoring bot’s numbers are a little bit off (i.e., overly generous) and are working to have that corrected as soon as possible.--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:04, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

changing my page

stop changing my page. Why should the page of Jack Hansen be a dead rugby player who played no significant role in this world. I deserve a wiki page over him since I am actually alive. Leave this page alone so I can get on with my life.

Thanks, Jack Hansen

I have replied on your talk page. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 21:30, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for removing the personal attack

I also report this user for Wikipedia:Sock puppetry see [1] and [2]--185.31.77.52 (talk) 20:29, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Check Wikipedia talk:Sockpuppet investigations--185.31.77.52 (talk) 20:32, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

so you work for a gallery, !!! which one !!

you just made me $500 , i am with an art client and he needed proof on the art forgery market and that it is stalked to keep out basic, and i mean basic info ! thanks a million for the $500 !!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8TZppXXsLUw

i am going to do it again, and if someone else pings it on Art forgery John Myatt i am going to get another $500 but if you ping it i only get $100

Sorry, I do not work for a gallery. If you left a message because of the reversion of your additions on the article Art forgery, then see my message on your talk page. Thanks. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 14:46, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Liance, I've blocked that account, he's obviously not here to contribute to the encyclopedia.  —SMALLJIM  14:49, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

so why cany you link the two biggest forgers in the 20th and 21st centurt. because you do work for a gallery, i pinged your IP and when you did take out the what i put in, it truly shows the one sided edits.... take a look at the truth...who are ther biggest Wolfgang Beltracchi who has a PAGE AND IS REFERECED BUT YOU CANT CROSS REFERECE! AND YOU SPAMMED IT TOO QUICK.. BUT YOU DID MAKE ME A $1,000 SO I WANT TO SAY THANKS FOR THE $1,000

easy money thank u User_talk:Liance

[[File:US-$1000-FRN-1918-Fr-1133d.jpg|thumb|who ever you are A $1,000

Please stop this nonsense, it is obvious that you are not here to create an encyclopedia. Doing this further may result in an IP block. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 21:19, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Jarrod Moses

You declined the sandbox version of Draft:Jarrod Moses, saying that it already exists in Wikipedia. I don't see an article on this businessman. The existing draft has problems, but please let me know why you said it was duplicated. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:00, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello. According to the deletion log of the article Jarrod Moses, it seems that it has been deleted beforehand so I believe that, when I searched for "Jarrod Moses", the article was still live on the article namespace. If I made any mistakes, please respond and tell me what I did wrong! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 16:49, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Checking the logs, the article was moved after I marked the draft as a duplicate. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 16:50, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you. In any case, the article needs improvement. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:01, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

VSAA page

My name is the TheMasterLlama. I am an editor of Wikipedia, and was recently editing the VSAA page. I made many additions, but my brother put "John Cena" for the principal. Please change all other arrangements back. TheMasterLlama (talk) 22:18, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Please see my response on your talk page. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 12:44, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Origination of Free Bet Blackjack

Liance,

I received your message regarding the removal of my update to the Mirage page regarding Free Bet Blackjack.

You can check out this page (http://www.downloadblackjack.com/free-bet-blackjack-casinos/) to see that the first Free Bet Blackjack table in Vegas was at the Golden Nugget. I can also personally confirm that, as I started playing Free Bet Blackjack at the Golden Nugget in August, 2012. Free Bet Blackjack was installed at the Mirage as the second Vegas location, with many more that have since followed.

Actually, if you read the source that is cited (http://thepogg.com/thepogg-interviews-geoff-hall-creator-of-blackjack-switch/), Geoff is actually quoted as saying "I will actually be in Vegas from November 25th - December 16th training and installing my new 'Free Bet Blackjack' game into The Mirage and Casino Royale, following an excellent trial at The Golden Nugget." — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhinoman7 (talk • contribs) 18:52, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

I will leave it up to you to correct this on the Mirage page.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhinoman7 (talk • contribs) 17:50, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Please see my response on your talk page. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 12:54, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shifting Landscapes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Henderson Bridge. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion

I would like the pages to be deleted immediately I did the wrong thing.

Please see my response on your talk page. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 05:26, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Liance Thank you for your assistance.

Liance this is my first Wiki entry for a full article and I am still getting a feel for how it works. This person I am trying to add to the Wikipedia is a football executive since 2002 and is currently with one of the top Serie A professional Football Clubs in Italy. There is so much material on him that I will take a few days to sift through it all. I am unclear what the difference is between references and external references. Be patient with me because if I do get a handle on this Wikipedia editing then I think I can become very passionate about contributing to the project. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 11lionsd (talk • contribs) 23:33, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mega Jump App Icon.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mega Jump App Icon.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MegaJump Gameplay.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MegaJump Gameplay.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:43, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Gardetto's Page Edit

Hello,

I made my first edit on the "Gardetto's" page based on a package I had purchased yesterday.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Gardetto's_Special_Request_Roasted_Garlic_Rye_Chips.jpg

Thank you,

Timothy

Xamen7 (talk) 18:14, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Xamen7 (talk • contribs) 18:11, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Speedy declined

I have declined your speedy on /Eulerian-Evolution-Lie-Bracket-Diffeomorphism-Group-CA, because WP:CSD#A1 is only for "very short" articles, which this is not. Certainly it needs an introductory section and a better title, but it is not a speedy candidate. I have moved it to Draft:Eulerian-Evolution-Lie-Bracket-Diffeomorphism-Group-CA. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 22:20, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Art Forgery, great job==

thanks for the one sided edit BLOCK, on the page.. i had to prove to a bigger client today..:Liance just wanted to say thanks for stalking, keep it up on ART FORGERY

— Preceding unsigned comment added by YOU JUST MADE ME 10G (talk • contribs) 15:36, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Lol, nice try. One more time and I'm reporting you. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 16:05, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

No worries they are already blocked. RickinBaltimore (talk) 16:09, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Everything alright?

Your userpage popped up on my watchlist saying that you flagged it for speedy deletion. Is everything alright? Altamel (talk) 17:42, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Yes, everything's alright. Just wanted to remove my userpage (for now) because it's really not necessary. Thank you so much for checking on me! You're an amazing Wikipedian :) -Liance^{talk/contribs} 19:09, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks! Good to see you are still around. Unfortunately, many editors who retire or ragequit tend to delete their userpage— just wanted to make sure that was not the case. Altamel (talk) 19:14, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Really?

Is there any particular reason you reverted my edits, and restored vandalism? Boomer Vial^Holla 20:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Aw fuck, sorry about that. I didn't check the text I was restoring. I thought it was just another IP blanking they page. Thanks for catching that for me. Boomer Vial^Holla 20:26, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Don't worry, everyone makes mistakes :) -Liance^{talk/contribs} 20:28, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mega Jump (February 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mega Jump and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

LaMona (talk) 01:25, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello! Liance, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! LaMona (talk) 01:25, 12 February 2016 (UTC)

Request on 12:01:31, 16 February 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by 11lionsd

• 11lionsd (talk · contribs)
  • User:11lionsd/sandbox/Sandro Mencucci (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Sandro_Mencucci&oldid=705160426 Thank you for reviewing my article. It has been rejected based on the assumption that I have not utilized reliable sources. I have quoted sources such as reputable newspapers such as the New York Times, Corriere della Sera, La Repubblica, La Nazione where Sandro Mencucci is referenced notably and indisputably as the CEO (amministratore delegato AD in Italian) of the ACF Fiorentina Football Club. I have referenced the federations and governing bodies of the football world such as FIFA, FIGC as well as other reputable calcio websites such as transfer market, calcio mercato as well as the ACF Fiorentina website Viola Channel and ACF Fiorentina Wikipedia page all in which Sandro Mencucci is identified as the CEO (amministratore delagato in Italian) of the ACF Fiorentina Football Club since the Della Valle era 2002. When I have referenced outside organizations such as Save the Children, Pune City FC or NorCal Premier League, CalcioDonne I have referenced those organizations websites directly where they identify Sandro Mencucci as the CEO (amministratore delegato AD in Italian) of the ACF Fiorentina Football Club. In addition to this, I have listed 19 published books with valid ISBNs who speak about Football in Italy and the club ACF Fiorentina and its history and contributions to the world of Football and they all specifically reference Sandro Mencucci as the CEO (amministratore delegato AD in Italian)of the ACF Fiorentina Football Club since the Della Valle era 2002. Other than to use reputable newspapers, national and international authorities and governing bodies in the world of Football, and published books on the topic of contemporary ACF Fiorentina as a valid organization to validate the existence and contribution of its 13 year Football manager Sandro Mencucci I am only left to understand that the issue with all due respect to the reviewer who has ample experience in libraries, that perhaps the issue is a language barrier. Perhaps the fact that with the exception of the New York Times articles and the FIFA, FIGC, Save the Children, NorCal Premiere League Viola Channel and Transfer Market, the majority of these references are from notable authors and journals but are written in Italian. If the reviewer is not familiar with the resources and their importance to Italy and to the world of Football (i.e. FIFA) then I would like to request that someone with ample knowledge of these international governing bodies and who has sufficient knowledge of Italian review my resources. Thank you. 11lionsd (talk) 12:01, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

11lionsd (talk) 12:01, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I see that you've resubmitted the draft of your article. You've added many more reliable sources since I first reviewed the page, and that's good. Some of the sources are still not independent and reliable (such as the Wikipedia article and the PDF hosted on Dropbox), but many more have been added. I recommend that you wait for another editor the review the article, and see what they say about what you need to improve on. Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia; your contributions are appreciated! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 17:08, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

11lionsd (talk) 11:11, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

hello! I have been working on your suggestions. Once I have a better understanding of how Wikipedia works, I will start expanding to other articles. It is a very interesting and stimulating project. Thank you again for all your help ! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 11:35, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	Greetings Derp-nerds:from Derpking154 (talk) 13:59, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Much appreciated. Thank you! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 06:27, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced message

Did not claim I own the Wikipedia page for The Romantics, I want to correct and update the information. I am Mike Skill of The Romantics, Original and current member of the band and agents and managers are tired of seeing the old/un-corrected info on The Romantics on Wikipedia and have requested we update it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Allmusic4u (talk • contribs) 06:44, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

I have responded on your talk page. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 20:56, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

Request on 20:26:36, 23 February 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by BePoTech

• BePoTech (talk · contribs)
  • User:BePowerTech/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I need assistance because this is the least user-friendly website when trying to create a simple page about a company the the assistance I've received has not helped me at all. I originally created my account with username "BePowerTech" then when I tried to create a page called "Be Power Tech" I was told the username and page name cannot be the same. So today I created a new username "BePoTech" and tried to create a page and received the following feedback:

Although warned both about COI and your username, you've continued to edit the article in your sandbox, and it appears that you submitted your sandbox for reviewing. There are a couple of problems here. First, you still need to change your username and to declare your conflict of interest. The information is all in the original COI information that I placed here. Second, when submitted to AfC for review, a sandbox is supposed to become a draft article. Why that sometimes does not happen I do not know, but it does. I could copy it to draft space, but I will not do so while you are editing in violation of the COI and namespace policies. You need to say what your relationship is with the company, and you need to change your username. LaMona (talk) 19:27, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

I started with a blank page today so for LaMona to tell me that I "continued to edit my article in my sandbox" is not true. If I knew how to fix my namespace problem I obviously would have done so. LaMona is not giving clear enough direction on how to fix this problem. Regarding the COI issue, I will work to resolve this.

Can you please help me with this namespace problem so that I can continue to work on this page and resolve the COI problem? If there is a phone number I can call that would be great because so far this "talk" option has only caused me more frustration.

BePoTech (talk) 20:26, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

BePoTech (talk) 20:26, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

I have responded on your talk page. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 23:13, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your patience!

XD In wkpd (talk) 14:32, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Appreciated. Thank you! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 14:33, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

18:49:09, 24 February 2016 review of submission by S1462065

• S1462065 (talk · contribs)
  • User:S1462065/sandbox/Court Decision no.8089/2556 Thailand (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I would like to ask how should i fix my article?

Request on 04:49:30, 25 February 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Dhanakkad Seth

• Dhanakkad Seth (talk · contribs)
  • User:Dhanakkad Seth/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

because I do not exactly follow your advice. Kindly suggest practical ways for improving the article. Does it need more references?

`````````````` `````````````````````` ```````````````````` ````````````````` Dhanakkad Seth (talk) 04:49, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

I have responded on your talk page. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 11:53, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

One of your draft reviews

For your future reference, your review of Draft:Luke John Burrows (which I've just deleted as an attack page) was completely inadequate (you simply reviewed it as lacking context). You need to take the time to ensure you're properly reviewing pages likes this one, as attack pages are considered something that needs immediate attention from administrators (whether in or outside of the draft space). Thank you, — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 15:46, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, I wasn't paying enough attention and didn't notice it was an attack page. It's my fault, sorry! I promise to be more careful in the future. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 15:51, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced message

Hello Liance,

This is Landsend35. I do not understand the statement that the KVH Industries article has no inline citations. I see 27 citations. I have re read all the live links about notability, independence, and reliability and I am unclear why the sources listed in the footnotes supplied do not qualify. Many thanks for all your help.

Landsend35 (talk) 16:12, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

I have responded on your talk page. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 16:18, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

KVH question inline citations

Hi, regarding rejection of the KVH sources, then, is this a formatting issue or a content issue? If I reformat the footnotes so they are highlighted and linked, is that acceptable? Many thanks. Landsend35 (talk) 16:28, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

I have responded on your talk page. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 17:41, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Misplaced message

Hi Lance,

I appreciate your comments and reviews. I have updated Jaleel Khan bio with new citations. Currently wikipedia has reference to this person - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vijayawada_West_%28Assembly_constituency%29

Please review my post and comment.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Istiaquem (talk • contribs) 06:36, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

I have replied on your talk page. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 14:45, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

WikiCup 2015 March newsletter

One of Adam Cuerden’s several quality restorations during round 1

That's it, the first round is done, sign-ups are closed and we're into round 2. Forty-seven competitors move into this round (a bit shy of the expected 64), and we are roughly broken into eight groups of six. The top two of each group will go through to round 3, and then the top scoring 16 "wildcards" across all groups.

Twenty-two Good Articles were submitted, including three by Cyclonebiskit (submissions), and two each by MPJ-DK (submissions), Hurricanehink (submissions), 12george1 (submissions), and Cas Liber (submissions). Twenty-one Featured Pictures were claimed, including 17 by Adam Cuerden (submissions) (the Round 1 high scorer). Thirty-one contestants saw their DYKs appear on the main page, with a commanding lead (28) by Cwmhiraeth (submissions). Twenty-nine participants conducted GA reviews with J Milburn (submissions) completing nine.

If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Thanks to everyone for participating, and good luck to those moving into round 2. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), and Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

18:32:38, 1 March 2016 review of submission by Holowiki

• Holowiki (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Richard B Hollis (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi Liance,

Thank you for looking over everything! Which links do you mean - the additional links at the bottom? Do you recommend just adding all of those as references instead of additional sources? Please let me know what I should improve upon/remove as we would love to publish this page as soon as possible.

Thank you again!

I have responded on your talk page. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 18:47, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
		Wizard101 (talk)						Add sources
		Búðardalur (talk)						Add sources
		Ally Carter (talk)						Add sources
		Kidz Bop 30 (talk)						Add sources
		Facebook (talk)						Add sources
		Lankester Merrin (talk)						Add sources
		Miami-Dade County Public Schools (talk)						Cleanup
		Leeroy Jenkins (talk)						Cleanup
		Quartz crisis (talk)						Cleanup
		Information published by WikiLeaks (talk)						Expand
		Anson Jones (talk)						Expand
		Twitter (talk)						Expand
		Grand Theft Auto (video game) (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
		Samsung Wave S8500 (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
		Kidz Bop 26 (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
		Aram (biblical region) (talk)						Merge
		Social media (talk)						Merge
		The Internationale (talk)						Merge
		The British School of Milan (talk)						Wikify
		Deepwater Horizon oil spill (talk)						Wikify
		Oil Derrick (Six Flags Over Texas) (talk)						Wikify
		Hash Code cracker (talk)						Orphan
		Visit Delaware (talk)						Orphan
		Alain Goldschlager (talk)						Orphan
		Joseíto Fernández (talk)						Stub
		Tiruvuru (SC) (Assembly constituency) (talk)						Stub
		Simple verses (talk)						Stub
		Machilipatnam (Assembly constituency) (talk)						Stub
		Nandigama (SC) (Assembly constituency) (talk)						Stub
		Canada and the 2016 United States presidential election (talk)						Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:35, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

17:19:25, 7 March 2016 review of submission by Holowiki

• Holowiki (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Richard B Hollis (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi Lance,

I had resubmitted the article for review but have not received any updates. Can you kindly look at the article? I want to make sure all my edits are good to go (I took out the links and additional references.

Thank you,

Jhelen

Request on 15:56:59, 29 March 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by OMagas

• OMagas (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:We Want Any Car (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

My article was declined as a result of in-line citations, please could you provide a number for me to call to get some clarity on how to deal with this? OMagas (talk) 15:56, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Your help desk question

You have a response.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:57, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Request on 14:44:58, 31 March 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Penslips

• Penslips (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Dean Faulkner Wells (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Good Morning -- I wanted to confirm whether my article on the subject of Dean Faulkner Wells, was published on Wikipedia. I received your note saying the article already exists, but I never received an email from Wiki notifying me that the article was published/accepted - though I have actually received a few emails from outside interested parties saying they can see the article on Wiki. In any case, I have been updating the article as much as possible in the hopes of it being published and as I said I just wanted to confirm that the article is available to the public. Thank you very much for your assistance. Sorry for the long note. ~~Penslips

Penslips (talk) 14:44, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

I have responded on your talk page. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 14:54, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

13:41:54, 1 April 2016 review of submission by TrumpDumps

• TrumpDumps (talk · contribs)
  • User:TheGhostOfBobSaget/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Why did you decline.

It's informative.

I have responed on your talk page. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 13:45, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

13:42:58, 20 April 2016 review of submission by New Baneshwor

• New Baneshwor (talk · contribs)
  • User:New Baneshwor/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I am trying to make a wikipedia page on New Baneshwor , which is a city located in Kathmandu, my request to make the page was rejected. What improvements can i make to improve this page.

I have responded on your talk page. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 22:34, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

09:49:09, 25 April 2016 review of submission by OMagas

• OMagas (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:We Want Any Car (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, I have asked a number of times about the inline citations yet haven't received any feedback on this? I have tried to do it according to the suggested help topics but I keep getting rejected. Please can you tell me what exactly is wrong with the citations?

I have responded on your talk page. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 22:30, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Race Car Replicas page

Thanks for the suggestions about improving the article. I removed the references to wikipedia in most of the cases, and replaced them with external links.

As to notability, please see the Kit Cars wikipedia page, and the dead reference to Race Car Replicas. A similar company, Factory Five Racing , also has a page that is referenced from the Kit Car article, and I loosely modeled the RCR page on that already-approved page.

Thanks, VMAX211Vmax211 (talk) 00:14, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

03:45:54, 27 April 2016 review of submission by Vmax211

• Vmax211 (talk · contribs)
  • User:Vmax211/Race-car-replicas (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I don't know if this is redundant- I'm still a noob in terms of article creation, and I think I have already answered these questions elsewhere. But if not, here are the responses:

The two stated reasons for rejection were a lack of notability and inadequate external references.

Re the notability issue, Race Car Replicas has a link to a dead page from the Kit Cars page. Another company, much like RCR, is Factory Five Racing. They are also linked from the Kit Cars page, and have their own article.

My submission for the RCR page was to add an article in the same vein as that of the Factory Five article, as they are very similar companies in the same general marketplace (though one serves the lower-end, and one the higher end).

The existing Factory Five article also has relatively sparse external references- I think the one I submitted has more.

I tried to replace internal references to the RCR page with externals where it made sense to me. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.

Thanks!

WikiCup 2016 May newsletter

FP of Christ Church Cathedral, Falkland Islands by Godot13

Round 2 is over and 35 competitors have moved on to Round 3.

Round 2 saw three FAs (two by Cas Liber (submissions) and one by Montanabw (submissions)), four Featured Lists (with three by Calvin999 (submissions)), and 53 Good Articles (six by Worm That Turned (submissions) and five each by Hurricanehink (submissions), Cwmhiraeth (submissions), and MPJ-DK (submissions)). Eleven Featured Pictures were promoted (six by Adam Cuerden (submissions) and five by Godot13 (submissions)). One Featured Portal, Featured Topic and Good Topic were also promoted. The DYK base point total was 1,135. Cwmhiraeth (submissions) scored 265 base points, while The C of E (submissions) and MPJ-DK (submissions) each scored 150 base points. Eleven ITN were promoted and 131 Good Article Reviews were conducted with MPJ-DK (submissions) completing a staggering 61 reviews. Two contestants, Cwmhiraeth (submissions) and Cas Liber (submissions), broke the 700 point mark for Round 2.

If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Thanks to everyone for participating, and good luck to those moving into round 2. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), and Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Request on 17:02:28, 25 May 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Dmytryk2008

• Dmytryk2008 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Rentberry (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

hi, i'd like to re-submit an article about Rentberry company. they got a lot of press coverage last week and I think now it makes sense to have them on Wiki. please elt me know if I can edit this draft.

Dmytryk2008 (talk) 17:02, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

11:19:52, 1 July 2016 review of submission by ResearcherTony

• ResearcherTony (talk · contribs)
  • User:ResearcherTony/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The statement is not new but is feared by many professionals to be a threat to job security. Only some have dared to mention it openly. There are references. It is the most agreed modern view, but a silent back room consensus.

To make this fly, what is needed besides references to establish it as the modern view among scientist today?

Your draft article, Draft:Mega Jump

Hello, Liance. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Mega Jump".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. GamerPro64 12:55, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Invitation from Wikipedia Asian Month 2016

Wikipedia Asian Month

Thanks for partipating Wikipedia Asian Month last year, and I hope you enjoy it. Last year, more than 7,000 articles contribute to Wikipedia in 43 languages in Wikipedia Asian Month, making us one of the largest event on Wikipedia. We will organize this event again in upcoming November, and would like to invite you join us again.

This year, we are lowering down the standards that you only need to create 4 (Four) articles to receive a postcard (new design), and articles only need to be more than 3,000 bytes and 300 words. We are also improving our postcard sending process, e.g. making the postcards right now, and collecting the address after the event ends without waiting other languges.

Wikipedians who create the most articles on each Wikipedia will be honored as "Wikipedia Asian Ambassadors". We will send you both digital copy, and a paper copy of the Ambassador certificate.

Sign up now

Thank you for considering! --AddisWang (talk)
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:47, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

New Page Review needs your help

Hi Liance,

As an AfC reviewer you're probably aware that a new user right has been created for patrolling new pages (you might even have been granted the right already, and admins have it automatically).

Since July there has been a very serious backlog at Special:NewPagesFeed of over 14,000 pages, by far the worst since 2011, and we need an all out drive to get this back down to just a few hundred that can be easily maintained in the future. Unlike AfC, these pages are already in mainspace, and the thought of what might be there is quite scary. There are also many good faith article creators who need a simple, gentle push to the Tea House or their pages converted to Draft rather than being deleted.

Although New Page Reviewing can occasionally be somewhat more challenging than AfC, the criteria for obtaining the right are roughly the same. The Page Curation tool is even easier to use than the Helper Script, so it's likely that most AfC reviewers already have more than enough knowledge for the task of New Page Review.

It is hoped that AfC reviewers will apply for this right at WP:PERM and lend a hand. You'll need to have read the page at WP:NPR and the new tutorial.

(Sent to all active AfC reviewers) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Liance. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Request on 21:30:29, 22 November 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Prerobin

• Prerobin (talk · contribs)
  • User:Prerobin/sandbox/Reading Hebrew Congregation (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

In rejecting my revised draft page on Reading Hebrew Congregation today, you highlighted notability and the independence and substantive nature of sources. It may be that the source "Portrait of a Community" appeared not to be independent of the Congregation. I have confirmed that it was written, published and paid for independently of the Congregation. The text was approved by editors who were not the author or the Congregation. Copies were purchased by individuals. Sue Krisman, the author, is a professional author. The book of 80 pages cites and displays many original sources and discusses the Congregation directly and in great detail. Reading Hebrew Congregation has been in existence for the entire period of the organised Jewish community in Reading, has many unique features and believe is sufficiently notable to justify its own Wikipedia page. Please can you advise what more I need to do to make the page acceptable.

Prerobin

Prerobin (talk) 21:30, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

I have responded on your talk page. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 22:36, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Please explain why you deleted inclusion of two newly invented squat exercises?

Hello Liance,

Can you please help me understand why my edits on the Squats (Exercise) Wiki were deleted? The SmithShaper Squat and the SmithShaper Wall Facing Squat are in fact two new types of squats made possible by a newly invented and patent pending wearable rolling wall exerciser known as the SmithShaper Ab & Squat Roller. These are completely different that "Smith Machine" squats and forward facing wall squats. Maybe that was the confusion. Let me know.

Regards,

Louis — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moraleslou (talk • contribs) 22:17, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

I have responded on your talk page. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 22:33, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

In response to your message on my talk page

Hello Moraleslou. I removed your edits on Squat (exercise) because I felt that the two entries you added to the list were not as established as the other entries. On Wikipedia, content must be significantly covered and established, and I felt that those two squats you added weren't very established. If you have any more questions, please feel free to contact me again on my talk page. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 22:28, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Liance,

Thanks for your response. I understand and agree. I will check back in a year or two, if and when the SmithShaper squat routines become more mainstream and established.

Regards,

Louis — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moraleslou (talk • contribs) 23:38, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Great. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 23:39, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

New page reviewer granted

Hello Liance. Your account has been added to the "New page reviewers" user group, allowing you to review new pages and mark them as patrolled, tag them for maintenance issues, or in some cases, tag them for deletion. The list of articles awaiting review is located at the New Pages Feed. New page reviewing is a vital function for policing the quality of the encylopedia, if you have not already done so, you must read the new tutorial at New Pages Review, the linked guides and essays, and fully understand the various deletion criteria. If you need more help or wish to discuss the process, please join or start a thread at page reviewer talk.

• Be nice to new users - they are often not aware of doing anything wrong.
• You will frequently be asked by users to explain why their page is being deleted - be formal and polite in your approach to them too, even if they are not.
• Don't review a page if you are not sure what to do. Just leave it for another reviewer.
• Remember that quality is quintessential to good patrolling. Take your time to patrol each article, there is no rush. Use the message feature and offer basic advice.

The reviewer right does not change your status or how you can edit articles. If you no longer want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. In case of abuse or persistent inaccuracy of reviewing, the right can be revoked at any time by an administrator. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:10, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter

Hello Liance,

Breaking the back of the backlog

We now have 816 New Page Reviewers! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog. Now it's time for action.

Mid July to 01 Oct 2016

If each reviewer does only 10 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
Let's get that over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.

Second set of eyes

Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work. Read about it at the new Monitoring the system section in the tutorial.

Getting the tools we need - 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey: Please vote

With some tweaks to their look, and some additional features, Page Curation and New Pages Feed could easily be the best tools for patrollers and reviewers. We've listed most of what what we need at the 2016 WMF Wishlist Survey. Voting starts on 28 November - please turn out to make our bid the Foundation's top priority. Please help also by improving or commenting on our Wishlist entry at the Community Wishlist Survey. Many other important user suggestions are listed at at Page Curation.

---

Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:16, 26 November 2016 (UTC) .

17:15:22, 30 November 2016 review of submission by AndyEWeber

• AndyEWeber (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Upper Hudson American Viticultural Area (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Liance, I've added many more references and external links, updated the text and added a picture. I don't know why the kit car links are showing up bellow...

Andy AndyEWeber (talk) 17:21, 30 November 2016 (UTC) AndyEWeber (talk) 13:05, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

12:57:43, 3 December 2016 review of submission by AndyEWeber

• AndyEWeber (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Upper Hudson American Viticultural Area (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Liance, I have provided additional external links and references. Also I have added more information in the text section to include a map of the AVA.

Thanks for your review

AndyEWeber AndyEWeber (talk) 12:57, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

I have responded on your talkpage. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 13:28, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected

New Page Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC))

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected

AfC Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter #2

Hello Liance,

Please help reduce the New Page backlog

This is our second request. The backlog is still growing. Your help is needed now - just a few minutes each day.

Getting the tools we need

ONLY TWO DAYS LEFT TO VOTE

• Improve the tools: Vote here.
• Reduce your review load: Vote here

---

Sent to all New Page Reviewers. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:54, 11 December 2016 (UTC) .

Fush listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fush. Since you had some involvement with the Fush redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 00:25, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Season's Greetings!

We wish you a Merry Christmas,

We wish you a Merry Christmas,

We wish you a Merry Christmas,

And a Happy New Year!

May your holidays be filled with peace and joy. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! Altamel (talk) 04:02, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
Adapted from {{Xmas6}}. Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:User:Altamel/Christmas}} to their talk page.

Misplaced message

Liance, I understand that you have edited my page on Tolland, Connecticut. As, I had seen it, there was some vandalism on it in regard to the names of the people. However, the three people you removed from the page are notable citizens of the town. If you wish, I can go and make edits to the names and descriptions to fit their actual titles. But, they are notable people. Contact me if you have any questions. Huskies.irish (talk) 18:23, 22 December 2016 (UTC)Huskies.irish

New Page Review - newsletter No.2

Hello Liance,

A HUGE backlog

We now have 816 New Page Reviewers!
Most of us requested the user right at PERM, expressing a wish to be able to do something about the huge backlog, but the chart on the right does not demonstrate any changes to the pre-user-right levels of October.

Hitting 17,000 soon

The backlog is still steadily growing at a rate of 150 a day or 4,650 a month. Only 20 reviews a day by each reviewer over the next few days would bring the backlog down to a managable level and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
It didn't work in time to relax for the Xmas/New Year holidays. Let's see if we can achieve our goal before Easter, otherwise by Thanksgiving it will be closer to 70,000.

Second set of eyes

Remember that we are the only guardians of quality of new articles, we alone have to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged by non-Reviewer patrollers and that new authors are not being bitten.

Abuse

This is even more important and extra vigilance is required considering Orangemoody, and

1. this very recent case of paid advertising by a Reviewer resulting in a community ban.
2. this case in January of paid advertising by a Reviewer, also resulting in a community ban.
3. This Reviewer is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry.

Coordinator election

Kudpung is stepping down after 6 years as unofficial coordinator of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing. There is enough work for two people and two coords are now required. Details are at NPR Coordinators; nominate someone or nominate yourself. Date for the actual suffrage will be published later.

---

Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review-Patrolling: Coordinator elections

Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)