User talk:LaundryPizza03/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Behavior abuse

this behavior has been ongoing with several months without people knowing who is abusing it. Pls add this behavior information here [1] that the person was placing oversized image of Osama bin laden on talk page and articles to vandalize (see here [2]) including on some wikiprojects with COVID names. 184.22.70.110 (talk) 10:12, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

• I need more context before I can verify this as an LTA. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 17:14, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

In pursuant to The News (The Amazing World of Gumball) AfD discussion

Hi LaundryPizza03,

I just wanted to let you know that I will be nominating ALL of the Freelancers television episode articles for deletion in pursuant to the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The News (The Amazing World of Gumball). Feel free to comment in the discussion!

You can see the discussion at: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Video Production Company

Best,

P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 23:03, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 21

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Cartoon Network: Battle Crashers

added a link pointing to NPC

Three-letter acronym

added a link pointing to IRT

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for making that bulk AfD nomination at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Routine (The Amazing World of Gumball)! P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 16:39, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

"Heat source" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Heat source. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 13#Heat source until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. --BDD (talk) 20:00, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Music of Polynesia

Good grief... I have had a go at the opening paragraph of Music of Polynesia, which is a start. Thanks for the heads-up! Jon (talk) 02:48, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

ESP Guitars

Hello, there seems to be confusion. I did not nominate ESP Guitars for deletion, only category filled with individual pages of guitars. I think if fixed ESP Guitars page itself is ok. Whole category is just like the sales catalogue. Ficadimerda (talk) 13:32, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Berdel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kurdish.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:45, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Your input needed

Hi LaundryPizza03, it would be helpful to have your input at Template_talk:Db-meta#T3_and_C1_categories.

If you have a moment, please could you comment there?

Thanks! --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 03:30, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

CFD for neologisms categories

Some of the categories, which you have edited are proposed for renaming. You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 October 4 § Neologisms, words and phases introduced in time periods. —⁠andrybak (talk) 01:24, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Phosphonium iodide has been accepted

Phosphonium iodide, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zoozaz1 talk 15:17, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Diphosphorus tetraiodide, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sublimation.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 7 October 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Racially motivated emergency calls (October 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Racially motivated emergency calls and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Racially motivated emergency calls, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 15:04, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Merge Template:Fluorides and Template:Fluorine compounds?

Good day Graeme Bartlett, those two templates deliver similar information. Would you think about merging them? -- Ktsquare (talk) 18:59, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

• Don't know; the former appears to be for binary compounds. Send it to WP:TFD. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 19:32, 23 October 2020 (UTC)

I Can See Your Voice merger proposals

@Hiwilms and LaundryPizza03: Good day. I've left you a message on some ICSYV franchises. If you want to see this, kindly please read carefully before doing this.

• Talk:Peesh ili luzhesh#Merger proposal
• Talk:I Can See Your Voice (Chinese game show)#Merger proposal
• Talk:I Can See Your Voice (German game show)#Merger proposal
• Talk:Falsez pentru tine#Merger proposal

Makoy Canlas (talk) 04:56, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

For the record

I didn't create Far future in religion. This guy did, and he's retired. I just text-moved it to reclaim a redirect. You can see the whole mess here. Serendi^podous 17:08, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

RFC template / Legobot explanation

The reason you had trouble with Legobot is that it scans for a signature to identify the end of the RFC-body, and it uses the timestamp to decide when the RFC template is "expired". Editing that date could trick Legobot into doing what you want, but that may be considered confusing or misleading to people. There is a better workaround to extend an RFC. If there are multiple timestamps on the same line, Legobot will use the last timestamp. So an explanatory comment (and signature) can be added directly after the original signature.

However extending the duration of this particular RFC probably wouldn't have improved the result. If you want, a new RFC would probably be the better option. Alsee (talk) 11:48, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mahajanga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malagasy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:36, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

AfD notice

Hi. Please see this AfD following on from the RfC you commented on. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 10:52, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

AfD for deaths due to COVID-19 and related RfC

Hi. Thanks for commenting at the recent AfD for the above list. There is now an ongoing discussion around the best way to split the list, if any, if you wish to comment further. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 17:33, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Neodymium(III) bromide

Could you help me see what is notable about this chemical? All the refs indicate is that it exists and has various physical properties, as evidenced by database and catalog entries. There's also no evidence that the sock who added the notability tag was doing so in a problematic way. Wasn't blocked at the time, wasn't using multiple accounts on this article, wasn't a part of a pool that disrupted articles, etc. DMacks (talk) 14:36, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

• You're right, everything here is routine or trivial, or can be said about NdCl₃. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neodymium(III) bromide. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 21:55, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

fiction about categories aren't really about those things

Category:Fiction about the Solar System and the rest don't match now. Shouldn't it be "Fiction containing" instead of "fiction about"? Just because something takes place somewhere, doesn't mean its about that at all. Ultima II: The Revenge of the Enchantress is a video game where you briefly visit the worlds in the solar system for a small part of it, it certainly not about the solar system though. The old title name of Category:Solar System in fiction made more sense. Category:Fiction about Algol has the Phantasy Star video games and other things that take place there, but aren't really about it, it just a name of a location. Movies and whatnot are the same, it not about the location. Dream Focus 04:31, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

• But otherwise, the categories get misused for where it is only incidental. You can purge anything where it is unimportant to the work. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 10:17, 9 December 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lutetium phthalocyanine has been accepted

Lutetium phthalocyanine, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gpkp [u • t • c] 16:38, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Use of sources at WP:ELEM

Your input would be appreciated at WT:ELEM § Informal poll 2. Thank you. YBG (talk) 21:28, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Hello, I'm FilmandTVFan28. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Studio B Productions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. We don't restore vandalism by an unregistered user. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 08:57, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Also that off topic content about the US and Russia relation was already removed entirely. — FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 09:27, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Again, we need to hide unattributed copying to Wikipedia, as explained at WP:CWW. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 15:38, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Weinerville, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Burnout.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Element colors

Here you mention element category colors i.c.w. WP:A11Y. To me it looks like this is not the subject of the ANI, so I am here to write about the coloring.

1. Of course, current coloring is problematic.

2. Apart from ACCESS, there also plays the question of "what to color" (today it's category, state of matter, occurrence, in a main PT; plus wl-blue).

3. Most complicating is: nine+unk categories to color, which is huge (few degrees of freedom).

Recent months my attention for ELEMENTS was drawn away a bit, but I have put up the frame of "Periodic table graphics", to develop better colors. It's at WP:PTG (Wikipedia:WikiProject Elements/PTG). It has a single talkpage, and is intended to contain (in the object pages) un-signed statements: as a WP page. Also other PT graphics should be cvovered.

It should contain design principles (lots of WP:ACCESS), ELs, refs. Also the talkpage to develop these pages. And more graphic PT topics but category colors. That's all ;-)

With that, we can redesign these colors. (btw, "pastels" might solve a lot, but imo they are not expressive enough to make the cell-to-legend-or-vv recognition). -DePiep (talk) 00:11, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

So, my question is, what do you think? WP:PTG. Setup, go live at WP:ELEM, design! ? -DePiep (talk) 01:12, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Okay, but it needs updating for the recent decision to adopt the 2010 category scheme with no unknown category. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 10:25, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

• Hi, Your edits like [3] have caused lots of trouble here. To be clear: I am working blisters on my fingers to give us a sound base for the color development. At least, I'd prefer if you make contact about planned changes. (Working simultaneously on the same template set will never work). Second, I'd like you to communicate about your wishes in this. (btrw, I'll revert the categorisation) as it breaks templates. -DePiep (talk) 19:22, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

  Sorry about that. I should have used <noinclude> markup for the templates. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 19:31, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Why don't you share your plans? Engage in a question-answer-style of cooperation? -DePiep (talk) 19:43, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fermi paradox, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tipping point.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Our major PTG approach

Hi LP03, I appreciate your involvement with WP:PTG. I am here to ask on "How shall we proceed?"

The bad cat colors are an old trouble, though I/we never took the time to attack it thoroughly. For me, that is because the requirements & issues & problems are huuuge. Multiple disciplines A11Y, W3C, CB-colorblindness), few degrees of freedom -- having 10 categories, etc. (Of course the right reply here is: stop doing it on you own! This is WP!).

For the technical stuff, we can find solutions like templates & processes (checking CB?).

My question in general is: how do we bring the PTG into strong solutions? Not just these "2020" colors (difficult by themselves enough), but also inspiring other wikis to follow us! Creating a color set that serves CB! Setting an i18n standard! For this, we need to have good and strong (color) design guidance & checks.

To be clear:

• How and when shall we go public with PTG (=to WT:ELEM), and create a formal Task Force? (one or two weeks?)
• How do we develop and discuss proposals? For example, I have design ideas myself, so how & where do we cheCk&discuss those?
• What do we need to make it great? Like, external websites, othEr checks (quantitative, qualitative), Webdevelopers-help (invite Wikimedia designers?).

Details, about individual sets, we can talk about elsewhere. This is about the grand PTG route. Talks can be here, at my Talk, and preferably at WT:PTG of course.

Have a nice edit, -DePiep (talk) 21:54, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Category creation

Hi, I see you have created and populated Category:Materials that expand upon freezing (8). However, maybe the topic is not fit for Categorisation. WP:NONDEFINING describes that non-defining characteristics are not to be used for categorisation. Please consider this when creating more new categories. Also, this category might be proposed for deletion by some editor. -DePiep (talk) 17:55, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Category:Lists of astronomical locations in fiction has been nominated for renaming

Category:Lists of astronomical locations in fiction has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 01:57, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Series of works

Do you plan to nominate any of the other terms for series of works for AFD? Template:Works series. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 17:53, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Squat categories

Hiya I'm getting a flurry of notifications about deletion of squatting categories, could I ask you to pause and I'll reply after I'm done with what I'm doing? I'm asking because otherwise there'll be a lot of repetition in the answers. Thanks! Mujinga (talk) 12:54, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

But there's only a few left to go through. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 12:57, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dual photon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orbital angular momentum.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Racially motivated emergency calls

Hello, LaundryPizza03. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Racially motivated emergency calls, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

New CSD for mass-created articles

Agree that this should be a criteria for speedy deletion. Wording might be "Mass-created article made without first seeking consensus per WP:MASSCREATION". Let me know if you start an RFC or whatever to do this and I'll support. I also think mass-creation needs to be something flagged up at NPP so it can be stopped early (e.g., more than 25 creations in 24 hours? 50 creations in 24 hours?) as the later intervention comes the worse the clean-up task is, and should be flagged even for autopatrolled users, not least because it might be a hack/vandalism. FOARP (talk) 09:35, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

@FOARP: Proposed wording:

This applies to books, content categories, files uploaded locally, mainspace editnotices, portals, and articles which make no credible claim of significance, that were mass-created by an automated or semi-automated process without community discussion or against consensus, and which have no substantial edits beyond creation.

Any revisions before I share my proposal at WT:CSD? –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:52, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Frankly I'd drop the "automated or semi-automated" bit. The link to "Mass-created" anyway gets into what that means, and you see people saying "I wasn't using any tools! I was just laboriously typing everything out and creating articles every 90 seconds that way!", which ultimately shouldn't make any difference (per WP:MEATBOT) anyway. FOARP (talk) 08:15, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Projectile motion, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Acceleration due to gravity and Closed form.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks

Yes I saw that you were renaming "category:such-and-such animal idioms" to "metaphors. Yes this is good, I made the categories but then I saw some were "idioms" and some were "metaphors" and that's not excellent, but then I forgot it. So... thanks! Appreciated. Herostratus (talk) 23:40, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

Your proposal, not a problem

Hi LaundryPizza03, I was one of the people who voted against your deletion proposal on WP:CfD. You got a lot of... negativity in the responses so I wanted to come by and say that that was not my reaction. I learned about your proposal from you, when you notified us on WikiProject:Horticulture (and I assume you did the same on a hundred other pages), so obviously there was nothing nefarious about it. You suggested it, we voted against it, nothing went wrong. (I replied saying I was voting against a "good faith stupid mistake." I hope that phrasing isn't a problem. Someone said that was uncivil, that I should not call you stupid. I had written that assuming you would understand what I really meant and that I was deescalating the comments. Hopefully you got that as it was meant. If not I can edit the comment.) It wasn't a big deal. An editor going through pages/cats and having opinions about them, sometimes wanting to delete them is what we all do every day... Invasive Spices (talk) 18:13, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Categories for creation posts

Hello, I saw your posts at WP:AFC/RC, but I was curious why you don't just create these as an auto-confirmed editor in good standing. Looks like you have created other categories as well. I have no issues with the requests; just curious. -2pou (talk) 22:33, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Just felt strapped for time. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:34, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

june

you're missing a banner for "This user has Autism" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Julius503 (talk • contribs) 19:36, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

it's already there nvm — Preceding unsigned comment added by Julius503 (talk • contribs) 19:37, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

@Julius503: I have signed your initial post for you. Please remember to sign your messages, especially if they have no relevance. What does "june" means? Are you thinking about "June"? Could you read WP:NPA and assure us you understand it? Sam Sailor 17:12, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

RFD discussion

Since WP:RFD#HOWTO was not followed, you might be interested in the discussions regarding WP:RAJ and WP:RSCASTE taking (currently) place at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 11. Best regard, Sam Sailor 17:12, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

"Chimpout" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Chimpout. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 15#Chimpout until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ― Qwerfjkl | 𝕋𝔸𝕃𝕂  (please use {{reply to|Qwerfjkl}} on reply) 06:25, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chalcogel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mercury.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Category:Sylheti dialects

Hello, LaundryPizza03,

You tagged this category as being discussed as a speedy rename but it is not listed at WP:CFD. Can you follow up on this? Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:27, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

@Ymblanter: removed it when time was up, presumably so that it could be deleted. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 01:29, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

This kind of thing happens, I thought I'd just check with you before tagging it as an empty category. Thanks. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:29, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Yes, it was up to a merge, I would have deleted it myself next time I visit WP:Categories for discussion/Working.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:06, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Lanthanum hydride

Hello, LaundryPizza03. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lanthanum hydride".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 01:56, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lanthanum hafnate has been accepted

Lanthanum hafnate, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Fade258 (talk) 08:54, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Another account

I Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Worldofknowledge121 I added another account here because of his same way of speaking in summaries in Breast Tax. This account owner is very famous in malayalam wiki. He will again create many accounts untill what he started is completed. 2402:3A80:524:B837:0:52:E156:7C01 (talk) 12:56, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Cleo & Cuquin

Hi, thanks for requesting pending-changes protection. It will be interesting to see how much vandalism persists. I think permanent pending-changes protection would make sense for children's television pages, but that might not be in line with policy. TSventon (talk) 13:32, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

I have submitted a similar request for CBeebies. TSventon (talk) 16:17, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tribalism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conflict.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Racially motivated emergency calls has been accepted

Racially motivated emergency calls, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

(t · c) buidhe 10:55, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Animal Laws Templates

Hello, LaundryPizza (great name), I remember from the May 28, 2021 Tfd you listed 23 templates of a similar subject over the discussion of Template:Legality of zoophilia by country or territory. Have you gone through each one of them? I'm currently doing so and do you think they should be nominated for a Tfd discussion? --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:31, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Bot

Apparently posting a message here would interrupt the bot until it's processed by its maintainer. Was it a one event, or can you see in its history a number of such recent issues? If the latter, I suggest to post some details on that page. Thanks, —PaleoNeonate – 19:15, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

I don't see anything else like this. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 19:20, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

RfC notice

This is a neutral notice sent to all non-bot/non-blocked registered users who edited Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Linguistics in the past year that there is a new request for comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Linguistics § RfC: Where should so-called voiceless approximants be covered?. Nardog (talk) 10:54, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

In re: banning

Hello,

Since you've taken part in my banning process, it is only fair that you explain where or to whom I can direct any queries about an appeal. Oddly, I am unable to do it under my user name. In fact, that is one of the more Kafkaesque aspects of the whole banning process under Wikipedia, that an appeal is "available" but it is effectively out of reach. 2001:8A0:67CE:CB01:1AB:D528:DC99:AEFF (talk) 15:58, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Which user are you? –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 16:39, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

My guess is [4], and it's true the ban notice didn't explain how to appeal. EEng 18:16, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

New Sock Investigation

Hello,

Can you open a sock case? If you look at the user edit history of Outlander07 (talk · contribs), all the edits that Nair finds are done. In 2016, user Rebtman (talk · contribs)[5]was a user with the same personality. It was blocked by the Nair caste editor in the past.[6]It is an old user but may have come back years later. Even though the old user block has been found, a very similar edit method can be found between them. Now Outlander07 is doing destruction and other caste edits on many ips, the same edits are [7][8][9] and rebtman did the same here [10][11]. one of which is ip. Outlander07 Sock currently has a page to check.[12] Would you like to give a sock after reading the user history of Outlander07? 106.208.10.29 (talk) 08:21, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

No, but I've got a boomerang: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/എപ്പോഴും രാജാവ്. You seem to be the same user who filed this SPI report, behavior-wise. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 09:50, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

So if you have any doubts I have no complaint in checking me too. 106.208.10.29 (talk) 12:21, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

For Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/France at major beauty pageants 👍 JBchrch talk 21:21, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

I Have Evidence To Back Up That My Sources Are Reliable With Reference To Space NukesChantern15 (talk) 06:03, 21 August 2021 (UTC)Chantern15

The AIAA is accredited by the ANSI as seen here: I would also like to add that this study shows up in the usra here: , which is overseen by 114 Universities as seen here: . Not to mention that the usra is affiliated with NASA and is under the auspices of the National Academy of Sciences. It was founded by James E. Webb. I hope that this helps to some extent in clarifying that my intention is not to post links from unreliable sources.

The Amazing World of Gumball

As listing the nationality of a multinational production is discouraged, would it be fine to simply list the show as British? Only a small amount of voice acting work is done in the USA, the majority of the production is done in the UK. For example, SpongeBob Squarepants is not considered an American-Korean production despite animation being done in Korea. FanOfGumball12345 (talk) 00:19, 25 August 2021 (UTC)

I Worked Through Fringe Concepts To Arrive At A More Reasonable ConclusionChantern15 (talk) 06:30, 21 August 2021 (UTC)Chantern15

I hope that you can look at my conversation with DeathLibrarian here: and see that while I started with a Fringe supposition, I worked through various logical possiblities and DL and I arrived at a more plausible and Earthly explanation. I hope that this can finally clarify that while I'm interested in Fringe concepts, it does not mean that I'm divorced from the scientific method. I wish to make a distinction that my engaging with Fringe subjects does not mean that I automatically endorse them, it just means that I wish to work through them in a scientific manner. After all, if we sacrifice curiosity and exploration for comfort and surety, all science would stop. I hope that this clarifies my stance for you. :D

References

Category:Lists of fictional astronomical locations has been nominated for merging

Category:Lists of fictional astronomical locations has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:07, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

RM notice

An editor has requested for Alpha-olefin sulfonate to be moved to another page. Since you had some involvement with Alpha-olefin sulfonate, you might want to participate in the move discussion (if you have not already done so).

Nomination of Jack Angel (SHC) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jack Angel (SHC) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jack Angel (SHC) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

--Bejnar (talk) 22:38, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Category:African Americans shot dead by law enforcement officers in the United States

I've begun a new CfD discussion for Category:African Americans shot dead by law enforcement officers in the United States; see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 September 18#Category:African Americans shot dead by law enforcement officers in the United States. As you participated in the previous discussion earlier this month you may want to take a look. All the best, – Arms & Hearts (talk) 18:05, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Zr(O2CR)4?

Looking forward to seeing evidence for this compound. --Smokefoot (talk) 14:38, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Evidence? A scientific paper isn't evidence? I note that I moved the article in question to Zirconium propionate because all GScholar hits were under that title, not "propanoate". –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 17:07, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

No: a "A scientific paper: isn't "evidence". You might seek out some mentor (or maybe another editor) who is a chemist and can explain that many "scientific papers" make claims that are unfounded. The situation is prevalent, esp in industrial literature where the focus is often on the app vs niceties of structural proof. But thanks for the response, I understand the situation better now. Cheers, --Smokefoot (talk) 17:29, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Rollback granted

I have granted the "rollbacker" permission to your account. After a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, contact me and I will remove it. Good luck and thanks. -- TNT (talk • she/they) 04:34, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Hantzsche–Wendt manifold

Hello, LaundryPizza03. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hantzsche–Wendt manifold, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, LaundryPizza03. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects and categories.
Message added 15:25, 9 January 2022 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Qwerfjkltalk

Disambiguation link notification for January 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ching chong, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chinese phonology.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Tendentious editing

Regarding your edit summary here, I find this an odd assertion as I have never seen the reverting of sockpuppet posts as being regarded as Wikipedia:Tendentious editing anywhere before. Rather, removal (or striking) is quite a standard procedure. I would appreciate it if you could explain why you considered it tendentious to the point where you sought to restore it. Best, CMD (talk) 23:27, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, I did not know that. How did you know they're a sock? –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 00:17, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

I'm very familiar with the user in question, and the timing of that edit compared to socking on other pages. On that page specifically the very fast post in response to my edit combined with the edit warring back in by proxy IPs is a general eyebrow raise. The specific edit in question also had a classic lie about no blocked users, which aligns with the issue you independently noticed where their sources don't actually support their text. CMD (talk) 00:23, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

Edits on American Decline

In regard to the reversion of my edit on American decline regarding Paul Kennedy and his position on the subject, I had thought that the inclusion of the Wiki link to his book upon which my addition was based would be enough, but on further reflection, I think you were correct, and additional information to supplement the edit was necessary. Even though it's a small addition, I have been critical of Wiki in the past for loose references and statements made based on opinion rather than a more factual objective basis, and I think that being punctilious in this regard is all to the good. I've given it a second shot, hopefully successfully. Sych (talk) 23:19, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Recording artists by label categories

Hi, you closed this CfD as rename in December, but it doesn't look like it was ever completed. Do you know what needs to be done to get that finished? Thanks. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 23:10, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

@Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars: I thought that XfDcloser would handle it automatically. Should I file a request at WP:AWBREQ to clean this up? –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:19, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Yes, that surprised me too. I don't know the best way to handle it. Can they be listed at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Working? Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 05:00, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Only administrators can edit that page, so I have posted a notice at AN. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 16:30, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Mohona Maiti

Hello, LaundryPizza03,

I wanted to alert you to kind of a fluke that exists. For some reason, when User:Ts12rAc moves a page from main space to draft space, he doesn't leave behind a redirect but a blank page. He is also listed as the page creator of that page and makes the only edit to it. But the page should be tagged as a CSD R2. We're not sure why this happens when he uses the Draftify script but it might have something to do with his status as a global rollbacker. As far as I know, he is the only editor who this happens to but it can be confusing and since you do so much patrolling, I thought I'd alert you to this peculiarity. Thanks for all of the work you do, LaundryPizza03! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:19, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Conway's Game of Life

Hi, how implementation of Turing machine is ok, but implementation of Lisp that is something extraordinary is possible SPAM? Did you even look at the pattern itself. It's something more complex than everything on this page. jcubic (talk) 11:20, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, I misjudged. A quick inspection of the link found no evidence of a COI, so you're off the hook. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 21:38, 28 February 2022 (UTC)

First planet

Hi, I removed your G14 from the page as it is not a DAB, but a redirect. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 04:20, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

G14 applies to redirects that end in (disambiguation) and point to non-disambiguation pages. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:27, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Mercury (planet) is not a DAB, and First planet does not end in the word (disambiguation). Happy Editing--IAmChaos 04:29, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

You're right, I meant to delete First planet (disambiguation). –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:41, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Deletion review for Antineutronium

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Antineutronium. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Nicole Sharp (talk) 08:55, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Vandalism again

User talk:Romancatholickochi has been indefinitely blocked since July 2021 for making POV edits on Pesaha appam page as discussed in the talk page of the article. You had resolved this and restored the page to the last good version back in 11th July 2021. Now the same POV vandalism edits are being done again with a new account (User:Hewhoknowsitall ) It seems to be the same person with new account. There is continued vandalism. Please see recent edit history. Could you please look into this. Thanks Belgdn (talk) 13:48, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

@Belgdn: Can't do anything directly about it except revert the bad edits. Next time, just file a report at the appropriate WP:SPI thread, in this case Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Romancatholickochi. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 15:42, 14 April 2022 (UTC)