User talk:HueMan1/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

G13 tag on old drafts

Hi HueMan1 -- I suggest you immediately remove the G13 tag when claiming drafts that have not been edited in 6 months, in case of accidents. Cheers, Espresso Addict (talk) 22:15, 29 January 2020 (UTC)

SM City Santa Rosa and Santa Rosa Inegrated Terminal

Good afternoon may I suggest not to redirect SM City Santa Rosa to SM Supermalls, and let Santa Rosa Integrated Terminal have a redirect to that article, because the terminal is part of the mall (SM City Santa Rosa) complex. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by TerahGabriel (talk • contribs) 06:41, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

@TerahGabriel: or should I say Terahbytes? Why are you so obsessed with this topic? --hueman1 (talk) 06:46, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Please read and understand this before you block me from editing. It is more organized if you redirect the information on Santa Rosa Integrated Terminal to the SM City Santa Rosa page. The only reason of removing of redirect of SM City Santa Rosa to SM Supermalls is to move the article information of the Santa Rosa Integrated Terminal, because the Santa Rosa Integrated Terminal is part of the SM City Santa Rosa mall complex. I hope you understand this. Thanks! comment added by TerahGabriel (talk • contribs) 06:49, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

No, SM City Santa Rosa is not notable. --hueman1 (talk) 06:52, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Then if not, you should make the Santa Rosa Integrated Terminal as a draft. contribs) 06:55 8 February 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by TerahGabriel (talk • contribs)

What I just did is that the information of the Santa Rosa Integrated Terminal has been redirected and moved to the Santa Rosa, Laguna page, just to avoid edit wars. Thanks contribs) 07:00 8 February 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by TerahGabriel (talk • contribs)

Why should I do it? My only concern here is that you are using multiple accounts and edit warring (you even passed the 3 revert rule). --hueman1 (talk) 07:02, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

You did what? But why? The terminal is notable. --hueman1 (talk) 07:04, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

The terminal is notable, and it feels too short on its own article, redirected in the Santa Rosa, Laguna#Transportation article just to be more organized. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TerahGabriel (talk • contribs) 07:05, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

If you don't like it, that doesn't mean anything. The article doesn't have to be long to stand alone. --hueman1 (talk) 07:14, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

If you think that SM City Santa Rosa is not notable, why do you think that the Santa Rosa Integrated Terminal has to be notable and has its own article, even though it is owned by the mall complex?

@RioHondo:, @Rosguill:, @Onel5969:, @Bbb23:, @Polyamorph: I am inviting you for this discussion. --hueman1 (talk) 07:28, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the ping. I've blocked TerahGabriel as a sock. Please don't create sock categories and populate them. That's not your job. I deleted the cat.--Bbb23 (talk) 14:12, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

@Bbb23: That's good to hear. Copy that. Cheers! —hueman1 (talk) 14:18, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Just to avoid edit wars, I just moved the SM City Santa Rosa article as a draft. Draft:SM City Santa Rosa, just to avoid edit wars. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TerahGabriel (talk • contribs) 07:33, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

• Comment Being one of only five officially designated provincial bus hubs for Metro Manila by the MMDA and DOTr makes the SRIT a notable topic worthy of a standalone article. See WP:BUSOUTCOMES. I too believe the mall has questionable notability, but if written from the view point of a mixed-use development that contains the bus transit hub, the mall (which i believe was the first SM Supermall ever built in Laguna), the residential component (Park Residences condominiums), and the BPO towers (one of only four SM locations that have this office space component specifically dedicated to the business process outsourcing sector as per this source), i think an article on SM City Santa Rosa as a livable mixed-use community and not just a mall can survive as a standalone article. And when that article is created, I would gladly transfer the bus terminal and all its content and redirect it to the SM City Santa Rosa mixed-use development article. P.S. Instead of tagging Philippine related articles with more sources needed tags, how about we as Filipino editors make the improvements we wish to carry out directly, and do our part in improving all our Philippine related articles. Thanks--RioHondo (talk) 02:28, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

false claims in AFD nomination

I request that you withdraw your AFD nomination, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cebuano Visayan State. You have acknowledged your original nomination was false; I regard your revised nomination as false too, as i have explained at the AFD. This is so messed up I think you should state your withdrawal and walk away. --Doncram (talk) 07:40, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Without due respect sir/ma'am, the only thing that is messed up here is you not getting the point that this article is indeed a hoax, sugarcoated with "hmm seems legit" terminologies and filled with "reliable sources", like the work of the most noteworthy writer of all time, John Kingsley Pangan. I know what I'm saying and I will stand my point. If you think that I am wasting your time, then it's you that should walk and stay away. Because—Ouch, what was that? I think you just bit me?—I don't think it's necessary and civilised to leave a message like this to a nominator and request him to withdraw his nomination, no, not in this manner, this is very disrespectful and rude, and you should know that. I did not admit anything except for the fact that my nomination was premature and not well explained. (How many times do I have to say that?) That doesn't mean that the article shouldn't be deleted and the nomination is bogus like what you've said a couple of times. And I don't care about the partition and secession of California, it's two different things, this doesn't make sense. It's not how analogies work. –hueman1 (talk) 15:34, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

I thought you acknowledged the article is not a hoax; now here you are claiming again that it is a hoax. The article is about a proposal, which I gather is an academic's proposal which may not have gained much or any support, but it is a fact that the proposal exists, so I don't understand how you can claim it is a hoax. In simple terms, your proposal was itself misleading (i.e. it was a hoax itself). And you don't have to agree with me, but I don't consider it promotional either, as I explain at AFD.

I don't know if you are a newish editor or not (haven't looked); if I knew you were new I woulda been less direct. But anyhow my advice to withdraw the AFD nomination is simply advice, for you to take it or leave it. And although I have been direct with you here, my advice is well-meant, for your sake, too. Most editors in Wikipedia, including me, have made a mistake or two or three, and I have found it best to admit misunderstanding something or misstating something whenever it happens, and withdraw anything i was proposing based on my misunderstanding or serious misstatement. My respect for another editor grows if I see them admit when they're wrong and try to make amends in any way (like withdrawing a proposal); I think an editor's credibility/reputation drops if they, when proven wrong, insist that they somehow are not wrong, e.g. based on their manufacturing some new argument for how they could have been right technically somehow. Keep it simple: apologize and walk away, is my advice. I obviously can't control how you receive the advice, so I guess from what you say you are experiencing it as rude; i would simply call it friendly advice given in direct terms, apparently too direct for you to appreciate this time. I am sorry I did not guess well about how we might be able to communicate here (sort of in private, at least away from the AFD).

Thank you for responding, anyhow, and I hope your Wikipedia experience is more pleasant in the future. --Doncram (talk) 01:03, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

@Doncram:, if there is one person who should walk away from that AfD, it probably is you. Everyone else at the AfD is capable of seeing beyond the somewhat problematic opening statement and to judge the actual merit of the issue, and whether the article should be kept or not. Now that it seems that the AfD will close as keep, you try to get your way by this rather backhanded tactic. This is not friendly advice, this is trying to win a losing argument by badgering the editor at their talk page after your "speedy keep" didn't gain any traction at the AfD. Fram (talk) 08:46, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of 2020 coronavirus outbreak in France for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2020 coronavirus outbreak in France is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 coronavirus outbreak in France until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ~Nick~{talk} 16:37, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Balbalasang–Balbalan National Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tabuk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Category:2019-20 coronavirus quarantines

Hello, HueMan1,

I see you tagged this category for CSD C1 speedy deletion but you didn't notify the page creator. Since you use Twinkle, please set up your Twinkle Preferences to always notify the page creator when you tag their pages for deletion. It's important that you select all CSD categories, including C1, as in Preferences, you are given the option to just select specific criteria. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:10, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

2 maps

You removed the second map on the coronavirus page saying "do we need two identical maps?" - but they weren't identical. One was total cases, one was cases per capita (i.e. per population). 86.174.28.98 (talk) 20:57, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

I didn't remove it, I just hid it (I used <!-- -->) because it wasn't there before and it's not an SVG map. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 03:02, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Hiding it is removing it for readers. "It wasn't there before" isn't a very good reason, is it? If everyone did that, nothing would ever get added! Any why does the format matter? Please be clearer as to your reasons in future. 86.174.28.98 (talk) 10:32, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Removing other people's posts

Please do not remove other people's posts like you did here. Interstellarity (talk) 00:10, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

@Interstellarity: Sorry for that, I didn't know why and how it exactly happened. I was replying to a discussion below this one and for some reason it got replaced by it. I tried to do it once again but I reverted the wrong one (your message?). I'm sorry. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 02:56, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

It's OK. I reverted it. Please try to be more careful next time. Interstellarity (talk) 10:28, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

2020 coronavirus pandemic in the Philippines

Great job on your work updating the 2020 coronavirus pandemic in the Philippines! If you are going to cite sources, please cite them properly using the {{cite web}} template per WP:CITE. Thanks! PatTag2659 (talk) 04:20, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Nasugbu–Lian–Calatagan Road concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Nasugbu–Lian–Calatagan Road, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:29, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Category:Hospitals and medical institutions associated with the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic has been nominated for renaming

Category:Hospitals and medical institutions associated with the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic, which you created, has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:59, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

COVID-19 Outbreak Cases in Luxembourg

Hi, you are the author of the map COVID-19 Outbreak Cases in Luxembourg. The map isn't correct. You have to consider Luxembourg as whole country. The 12 cantons of Luxembourg are affected by COVID-19, not only the canton Luxembourg. Our government doesn't make a difference between the 12 cantons. Please correct the map. Thanks --Sultan Edijingo (talk) 11:36, 21 March 2020 (UTC) from Luxembourg.

@Sultan Edijingo: Do you have a list of cases by cantons? —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 11:45, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

No, the cases are not listed by cantons. The cantons have no importance any more. --Sultan Edijingo (talk) 11:51, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

May I ask you to colour the whole country in red, the actual map with the canton of Luxembourg makes no sense. --Sultan Edijingo (talk) 17:18, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

@Sultan Edijingo:  Done! —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 19:30, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Metro Manila, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pateros (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:29, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Here you are

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

For depopulating a category that you nominated for deletion in violation of WP:CFD....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:20, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

@WilliamJE: But why. The region is defunct since 2017 and its former component provinces were reverted to their former regions, Western and Central Visayas. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 12:36, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

@WilliamJE: HueMan1's latest contributions are justifiable. You may look at Negros Island Region for the details on why the user's acts are reasonable. It has been abolished since 2017, and like what he said, the two provinces - Negros Occidental and Negros Oriental, were returned to their respective regions - Western Visayas and Central Visayas. I presume that through your access to these articles there's no need for consensus. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:45, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

It is policy and consensus not to empty a category at CFD and before taking it to discussion. We don't depopulate categories whatever the reason they are at CFD unless it is vandalism....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 13:02, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

William is correct, no matter how uncontroversial it seems, please do not empty a category while it is being discussed at CfD. And there is no need for it if the discussion resolves in a deletion.

Also, you didn't do this but don't ever empty a category "out of process" so that it can be nominated for speedy deletion as an empty category (CSD C1). It's best to use the CfD process and wait until the discussion is closed. These are not urgent matters so I request that you exercise patience.

These are just reminders, so please use the CfD process and wait for the cases to be closed. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:16, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Warning: mass deletion of articles outside AfD process and while discussion is ongoing

Those are bad faith moves considering that the discussion that you yourself started just recently at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Philippine-related articles#Barangay notability has not reached a consensus yet. You have been warned.--RioHondo (talk) 17:09, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Senator Benigno S. Aquino, Jr. Avenue

Hello, HueMan1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Senator Benigno S. Aquino".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:22, 26 March 2020 (UTC)

My Draft

I understand that you wanted to edit the draft that I am working right now. I appreciate that you included some new data ('cause I really need more help with this); but I would like to request that please do not change my table formats and the templates (like using {{Hover title}} and not {{Abbr}}) that I am using (except for my typos). Please feel free to add new information about the cases, but other than that please leave them as is. I have reasons why things are written/encoded that way; so please don't change them without discussing them with me. Thank you. .

I will have to revert them for now; I'll keep the new data you've added. Thanks and take care.--AR E N Z O Y 1 6A•t a l k• 07:50, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

@Renzoy16: I am very sorry for that. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 13:12, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:East–West Road

Hello, HueMan1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "East–West Road".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:37, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Hate to see you go

Hi Hueman1. Please reconsider retiring from Wikipedia. Hopefully you didn't have some negative experience? I appreciate your efforts over the last few years, so I hate to see you go. Hopefully you can continue to contribute, even in a reduced capacity if necessary. If there is anything I can do to help, let me know. Regards.

For your contributions to Wikipedia and humanity in general, you are hereby granted the coveted Random Smiley Award.
(Explanation and Disclaimer)

-- P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:33, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for your concern, I'm still thinking about it . —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 13:53, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia PH Month: A Call for Collaboration

Hi!

Wikipedia Philippine Month or simply Wikipedia PH Month is a monthly online event inspired by Wikipedia Asian Month that aims to promote Philippine content in Philippine Wikipedia editions and beyond. Each participating local community runs a monthly online edit-a-thon, which promotes the creation or improvement of the Wikipedia content about a particular group or groups of people in the Philippines and the region they represent. The participating community is not limited to the Philippines. This activity also aims to encourage collaboration among Filipino contributors within the archipelago and in the diaspora and to create linkages among Filipino and non-Filipino contributors who support the main objective.

If you have any thoughts about this project, kindly share it in the talk page. --Filipinayzd 19:27, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

2020 Philippine quarantine

Hello. As per Presidential Spokesperson Harry Roque's broadcast earlier this week, the Aurora province of Region 3 is now in general community quarantine. Can you edit the map? Thanks in advance. Regards, 👦 14:26, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi Nino Marakot, according to the Philippine News Agency, the general community quarantine will begin on May 1st, 2020, so we'll have to wait for the meantime. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 14:37, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

Ok, then we can wait. Thanks for your great work! Regards, 👦 14:42, 29 April 2020 (UTC)

@Nino Marakot:  Done! —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 00:48, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

An ethereal being for you!

(Hopefully you like felines) anyway, thank you for your contributions! Looking forward to seeing waaay more of what you can do.

Thank you for sharing logical and truthful insights as well. I wish you better days ahead!

{{ping|Koressha}} {interact|ambags} 11:19, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Svgs and personal info

Sorry if you are already aware of this, but I thought it would be worth mentioning that when you upload inkscape svgs, the code can include personal information such as the filepaths you store the image at on your computer. CMD (talk) 08:57, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

@Chipmunkdavis: Oh, no one told me this before. So my filepaths are scattered all over Wikimedia Commons? *facepalm* —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 11:49, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Well, I only looked at one image, but yes, it had enough filepath for me to guess at some personal information. If you're concerned, I'm sure someone at commons could help you delete files and you can reupload them as clean svgs. CMD (talk) 15:49, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Help in converting SVG paths to polygons?

Hello. May I ask if you know how to convert SVG paths to polygon points, so that we can finally convert those polygon points to wiki syntax (for Template:Provinces of the Philippines image map? I have tried this online conversion tool but the <title> element is removed in the conversion process. I used Chipmunkdavis' modified version of the original SVG file you uploaded as it contains the waterbodies, and was able to reduce its file size by simplifying its paths. The code containing the simplified paths is at User:Sanglahi86/sandbox. Thank you. –Sanglahi86 (talk) 13:10, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

@Sanglahi86: Actually, I already started making polygons for waterbodies in the background but did not include them on the code since I noticed some inaccuracies on the map (e.g. the island of Mindoro should be somewhere closer to Marinduque; the island province of Siquijor is located further left when it should be aligning with Misamis Occidental on the south). Although the boundaries are correct, I am clueless on how will I correct these errors; I even considered making a new map from scratch. I'll try different things when my internet comes back. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 00:48, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

You seem to have used Felipe Aira's File:PhlMapCit.svg as base map. Back sometime in 2016, I was creating some maps and also used that SVG and noticed several distortions in the polygons. If you would consider creating a new map from scratch, I suggest you instead use Hellerick's much more accurate File:Philippines location map (square).svg as it is the standard map used in Module:Location map/data/Philippines for displaying map coordinates using {{coord}}. Thanks. –Sanglahi86 (talk) 09:51, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Thank you! I'll be starting immediately once my internet decided to work. By the way (of topic), what went wrong about your reversion of COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines? —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 11:14, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

PH Province map inconsistencies

Hi HueMan, can you explain what you mean by inconsistent in File:Ph administrative map blank.svg? CMD (talk) 10:17, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

@Chipmunkdavis: The map size and line strokes were altered. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 11:05, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

And what is that inconsistent with? CMD (talk) 12:58, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Like for example, File:Blank map of the Philippines (Provinces).svg. See the rest of my uploads here: Special:ListFiles/HueMan1. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 13:22, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Because these images are svgs, they are inherently scaleable. Width="840" height="1221" is identically proportioned to width="4200" height="6105". I suspect the stroke widths were automatically adjusted to look the same if blown up 25 times. CMD (talk) 13:45, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 25

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Administrative divisions of Pangasinan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Alaminos

Attack on Clark Field (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Angeles

List of Ghost Hunters International episodes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Angeles

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Administrative divisions of Pangasinan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alaminos (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Some bubble tea for you!

Thanks for the infobox in the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020 page Sabaybayin (talk) 15:42, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thanks for your contributions to the COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines‎. You're doing a great job. Cheers! Allenjambalaya (talk) 14:33, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

@Allenjambalaya: Thank you! You're doing a great job too! I think it's about time to make some recounts on the "Daily COVID-19 cases in the Philippines by region of residence" table. This newly updated Laging Handa site could help us do the job a lot easier. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 15:08, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

@HueMan1: Yes. I'm having a hard time to catch up the missing data when I take even just a one day rest. And what a beautiful layout the site has. It usually takes me 5 to 10 minutes to manually type in the data with the DOH's NCOV Tracker but with this new one, I might only spend maybe 2 to 5 minutes. Great! Hope you'll not lost your motivation or hope in updating PH's COVID cases in Wikipedia. Cheers!—Allenjambalaya (talk) 00:22, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 22

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Shrines to the Virgin Mary

added a link pointing to Lipa

Tomas del Rosario College

added a link pointing to Balanga

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Deaths of Carl Arnaiz and Reynaldo de Guzman

Hello, HueMan1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Deaths of Carl Arnaiz and Reynaldo de Guzman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:28, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Forever Yours (Avicii and Kygo song)

Hello, HueMan1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Forever Yours".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:11, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:E5 expressway (Philippines)

Hello, HueMan1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "E5 expressway".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 00:37, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Bayanihan to Recover as One Act moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Bayanihan to Recover as One Act, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 19:54, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

List of covid deaths

Since List of deaths due to COVID-19 has been questionably nominated for deletion, your opinion on the discussion page would be useful. --Pesqara (talk) 23:13, 20 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

AfD for deaths due to COVID-19 and related RfC

Hi. Thanks for commenting at the recent AfD for the above list. There is now an ongoing discussion around the best way to split the list, if any, if you wish to comment further. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 17:41, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Agdao, Davao City

Hello, HueMan1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Agdao".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:16, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!

Hello HueMan1: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, 𝙲𝚘𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐𝙲𝚢𝚌𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚎 ᴛᴀʟᴋ 01:58, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

𝙲𝚘𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐𝙲𝚢𝚌𝚕𝚘𝚗𝚎 ᴛᴀʟᴋ 01:58, 24 December 2020 (UTC)

Naascu Champions per year

Hello publisher I just wanted to know if the champions and Mvp of each year of naascu men’s division can be added to the page. I did do some research and have put together all the champions from the start of naascu. Thanks and I hope you take time to put it on the page. God bless

Champions (Mens Division) Each Year:

2019: St Claire College

         Runner up- Enderun Colleges 

2018: St Claire College

          Runner up-  Enderun Colleges

2017: St Claire College

        Runner up: Decampo College 

2016: St Claire College

        Runner up: Fatima University 

2015: Centro Escolar University

          Runner up: St Claire College 
       

2014: Centro Escolar University

          Runner up: St Claire College 

2013: Centro Escolar University

          Runner up: St Claire College 

2012: St Claire College

          Runner up: Centro Escolar University 

2011: University of Manila

         Runner up: STI 

2010: University of Manila

         Runner up: STI

2009: San Sebastian College Cavite

          Runner up: University of Manila 

2008: San Sebastian College Cavite

           Runner up: STI

2007: STI

         Runner up: University of Manila 

2006: AMA Computer College

          Runner up: STI

2005: University of Manila

          Runner up: STI 

2004: University of Manila

          Runner up: Centro Escolar University 

2003: University of Manila

          Runner up: University of Makati 

2002: University of Manila

          Runner up: Las Pinas College

2001: University of Manila

          Runner up: Las Pinas College Heem112020 (talk) 04:48, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

@Heem112020: Can you specify which page are you referring to? And in case you didn't know, original research isn't allowed in Wikipedia. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 06:59, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

The NAASCU page I’m referring too Heem112020 (talk) 10:58, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

@Heem112020: Unfortunately, I was only performing an automated cleanup using AutoWikiBrowser a few months ago. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 11:05, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Dilbert22ph

Please do consider changes made. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dilbert22ph (talk • contribs) 10:19, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

@Dilbert22ph: What are you doing? —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 10:21, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Highways in Bangsamoro

A tag has been placed on Category:Highways in Bangsamoro requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:38, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Highways in Cagayan Valley

A tag has been placed on Category:Highways in Cagayan Valley requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:38, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Highways in Calabarzon

A tag has been placed on Category:Highways in Calabarzon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:39, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Highways in Caraga

A tag has been placed on Category:Highways in Caraga requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:39, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Highways in Central Luzon

A tag has been placed on Category:Highways in Central Luzon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:40, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Highways in Central Visayas

A tag has been placed on Category:Highways in Central Visayas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:41, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Highways in Eastern Visayas

A tag has been placed on Category:Highways in Eastern Visayas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:43, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Highways in Mimaropa

A tag has been placed on Category:Highways in Mimaropa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:43, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Highways in Northern Mindanao

A tag has been placed on Category:Highways in Northern Mindanao requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:45, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Highways in Soccsksargen

A tag has been placed on Category:Highways in Soccsksargen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:51, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Highways in the Cordillera Administrative Region

A tag has been placed on Category:Highways in the Cordillera Administrative Region requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:52, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Highways in the Davao Region

A tag has been placed on Category:Highways in the Davao Region requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:54, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Highways in the Ilocos Region

A tag has been placed on Category:Highways in the Ilocos Region requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:54, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Highways in Western Visayas

A tag has been placed on Category:Highways in Western Visayas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:55, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Highways in Zamboanga Peninsula

A tag has been placed on Category:Highways in Zamboanga Peninsula requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:55, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Highways in the Philippines by region

A tag has been placed on Category:Highways in the Philippines by region requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 14:56, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

changes in redirects

just fyi, its probably goes against WP:NOTBROKEN. Just putting it here before an admin says so. Starzoner (talk) 14:18, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Michael Weirsky

I started a draft about Michael Weirsky. Can you please make it a full article that is a good article or featured article, please? I would prefer it to be featured article. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Michael_Weirsky — Preceding unsigned comment added by LotteryGeek (talk • contribs) 18:05, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Port of Manila, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tondo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Dasmariñas–Las Piñas Transmission Line

Hello, HueMan1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dasmariñas–Las Piñas Transmission Line".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:50, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Clean up caution

Hi, in this edit, you changed The First World War 1914–1918, Vol.1 to The First World War I914–1918, Vol.1. DuncanHill (talk) 15:07, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Ah, shoot. @DuncanHill: Sorry, I didn't expect that to happen. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 15:15, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

It's OK, easily fixed. I do appreciate the clean up you're doing - "World War 1" really annoys me!. DuncanHill (talk) 15:20, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

@DuncanHill: Oh, thanks. Btw, there are about 1400 articles that mentions/links to "World War One" and "World War Two" which is more annoying. I'll probably fix them later. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 15:34, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

My preference is for First World War and Second World War. DuncanHill (talk) 15:35, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

What, precisely, is wrong with World War One rather than World War I? Ditto for World War Two? Where has this been discussed?Nigel Ish (talk) 09:25, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Some thanks

I noticed a mass edit on the article about the Covid-19 in Metro Manila I appreciate the correction on my edits especially under the mass vaccination program since I may had made some notable mistakes such as Unclear word formation on sentencing.

as I am still learning about editing articles.Im thankful for your contributions to the website and my own Article

Ghenzo Mulno — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ghenzo Mulno (talk • contribs) 04:03, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

@Ghenzo Mulno: No worries. Feel free to ask me if you have questions. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 04:19, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Template editing

Hi, you were asking about being able to edit {{History of the Philippines}}. Have you considered applying for the template editor user right? Samsara 19:01, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Wikidata

Is it possible to do this:

• Add party colors' hexcodes in Wikidata entries of political parties.
• Change SVGs so that the hexcodes always correspond to the Wikidata of a party whatever it is. (We can't do this on PNGs.)
• Templates will use Wikidata to know what is the hexcode of a political party.

Howard the Duck (talk) 16:41, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

@Howard the Duck: Maybe... Let me run some tests. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 08:58, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

@Howard the Duck: I think it's possible, the Republican Party's Wikidata item (Q29468) has a "sRGB color hex triplet" parameter (P465). —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 09:04, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

@HueMan1: Interesting. I wonder how is that being used. Howard the Duck (talk) 21:40, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

@Howard the Duck: What are we going to do now? —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 00:32, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

@HueMan1: We'd have to find out how the hexcodes from Wikidata are being used. If they are, they can be integrated to templates. If Wikidata can be linked to SVGs, the better. Howard the Duck (talk) 04:24, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

@Howard the Duck: I guess it won't be that hard but I highly doubt that those hexcodes are currently being outside Wikidata—I haven't checked anything yet. The SVG part is tricky though, we might still have to some work outside Wikipedia for that. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 04:43, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

I think, for the most part, templates with a "/meta/color" suffix are the ones being used throughout Wikipedia. I see no reason for us to be inconsistent with that. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 04:48, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

@HueMan1: They are sorta slowly depreciating that (they're still using /meta/color but presumably you can use names other than what's listed there, and it won't break the template, but I dunno how Wikidata plays into the new system that they're using. Howard the Duck (talk) 04:54, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

@Howard the Duck: We can always suggest these changes to the concerned WikiProject. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 04:59, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Your removal of "See also" section at COVID-19 vaccination in the Philippines

Hello HueMan1, I just want to let you know that the mobile web version of Wikipedia does not show the navbox on any of the articles with navbox templates. Its quite not nice to remove my addition as you did here. Besides there are also some "COVID-19 vaccination in (country name)" articles with "See also" sections alongside the navboxes such as here, here and here. I didn't readded back the same addition in the article since it would lead to edit warring if things are not solved. VictorTorres2002 (talk) 04:59, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

I've readded back the section on the article with the link to the Deployment of COVID-19 vaccines article instead. VictorTorres2002 (talk) 08:25, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

@VictorTorres2002: Articles mentioned on the body of an article shouldn't be repeated on the "See also" section per MOS:NOTSEEALSO. Sorry for not elaborating my reason though. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 10:25, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

HueMan1, its fine though. I clearly understand it now. Cheers! VictorTorres2002 (talk) 10:56, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Timeline of the COVID-19 pandemic in Thailand

Your edit resulted in several broken references; please fix them or request a bot do so if you can. Also, the split from the main article was previously discussed, and it would have been a good idea to raise this on the talk page first. Anyway, I've relocated the content to Statistics of the COVID-19 pandemic in Thailand, as this is also an approach done with many country articles. Please also remember to link to source pages when making splits per WP:CWW. Thanks. --Paul_012 (talk) 17:56, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

@Paul 012: Got them fixed already. Sorry for not checking first. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 02:10, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Nueva Guipúzcoa

Hello, HueMan1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Nueva Guipúzcoa, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 31 March 2021 (UTC)