User talk:GTrang/Archive 5

Archive 1

←

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

→

Archive 10

Talk:Saraiki people

Sorry. Bradv 18:32, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Are you going to fix it or shall I? Bradv 18:34, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

@Bradv: Yes, I will swap the pages again. You have undone the swap I have already done, so I have to redo it. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 18:37, 2 January 2017 (UTC)

Consumer behaviour

I apologize if I deleted text from the consumer behaviour entry. It was an error. I only wanted to add the psychology sidebar. Iss246 (talk) 02:47, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Jeet Gian page

User:GeoffreyT2000 @GeoffreyT2000,

Please do remove the notice 'this page is considered for deletion' from the page of Jeet Gian. More information has been added along with all references as well. Jeet Gian is an Indian author who has penned two successful novels and is writing his third, and this page helps provide information about him to everyone. Request you to remove the 'deletion notice' from the page.

Thank You. Regards Pri D (talk) 08:13, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

@Pri D: I have withdrawn the AfD because you told me to do so here. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 15:19, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

User:GeoffreyT2000

Thank you GeoffreyT2000!

Pri D (talk) 10:15, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Request on 21:19:50, 14 January 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Hoovbacca

• Hoovbacca (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Jeff Coffey (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

As a first time creator, wondering how much more "oomph" for lack of a better term, my article needs. I am open to and looking for any suggestions!

james

Hoovbacca (talk) 21:19, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

@Hoovbacca: The draft has already been moved to mainspace at Jeff Coffey by SwisterTwister. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 03:25, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Remove AWB access from alternative account

{{admin help}} I do not want AWB access on my alternative account GTAlt anymore. Can an administrator please remove "GTAlt" from the AWB checkpage? Do not remove my main account name "GeoffreyT2000" from the list, only the alternative account. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 17:56, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

 Done Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 20:26, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Request

Hi GeoffreyT2000,

I have two accounts on Wikipedia I want to delete my old account "AsadGhali1110" And continue on this account

Do you help me with this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AsadGhali2200 (talk • contribs) 08:04, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

@AsadGhali2200: The account AsadGhali1110 does not exist and accounts cannot be deleted. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 01:21, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Prasuton Manorah

Hi. Prasuton Manorah, as an alternative spelling of Phra Suthon Manora, should redirect to Manohara, which is the primary topic. Please consider restoring the disambiguator for the TV series. Thank you. --Paul_012 (talk) 01:01, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

@Paul 012: I have moved the page back to Prasuton Manorah (TV series) and created a redirect per your request here. The article has also been renominated for a 2nd AfD. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 01:30, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Prasuton Manorah (TV series) was sent to AfD again, by K.e.coffman at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prasuton Manorah (TV series) (3rd nomination). I have commented "delete" there. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 16:17, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Rebel Heart move

Do you really think this was a good idea? There is some pretty shaky logic behind most of those supports. Most of them completely disregarded the actual content of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC – re: long-term significance - and one supporter even goes so far as to specifically point out WP:TITLEPTM, but they dismiss it outright by saying the Madonna album should be primary topic because it's time to "give the album an honor already". Will I initiate a move review, or would you prefer to start another RfC? Homeostasis07 (talk) 20:48, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

@Homeostasis07: I have started a move discussion at Talk:Rebel Heart#Requested move 22 January 2017 for reverting both moves. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 21:01, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Move review for Rebel Heart

An editor has asked for a Move review of Rebel Heart. Because you closed the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. Homeostasis07 (talk) 18:44, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter No.2

Hello GTrang,

A HUGE backlog

We now have 803 New Page Reviewers!
Most of us requested the user right at PERM, expressing a wish to be able to do something about the huge backlog, but the chart on the right does not demonstrate any changes to the pre-user-right levels of October.

Hitting 17,000 soon

The backlog is still steadily growing at a rate of 150 a day or 4,650 a month. Only 20 reviews a day by each reviewer over the next few days would bring the backlog down to a managable level and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work!
It didn't work in time to relax for the Xmas/New Year holidays. Let's see if we can achieve our goal before Easter, otherwise by Thanksgiving it will be closer to 70,000.

Second set of eyes

Remember that we are the only guardians of quality of new articles, we alone have to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged by non-Reviewer patrollers and that new authors are not being bitten.

Abuse

This is even more important and extra vigilance is required considering Orangemoody, and

1. this very recent case of paid advertising by a Reviewer resulting in a community ban.
2. this case in January of paid advertising by a Reviewer, also resulting in a community ban.
3. This Reviewer is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry.

Coordinator election

Kudpung is stepping down after 6 years as unofficial coordinator of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing. There is enough work for two people and two coords are now required. Details are at NPR Coordinators; nominate someone or nominate yourself. Date for the actual suffrage will be published later.

---

Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

CSS styling in templates

Hello everyone, and sincere apologies if you're getting this message more than once. Just a heads-up that there is currently work on an extension in order to enable CSS styling in templates. Please check the document on mediawiki.org to discuss best storage methods and what we need to avoid with implementation. Thanks, m:User:Melamrawy (WMF), 09:11, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

2017 Pac-12 football Championship Game article

Can You fix the article for me please. 2600:8803:7A00:19:F9E8:259A:179F:F5C1 (talk) 21:12, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

@2600:8803:7A00:19:F9E8:259A:179F:F5C1: The article Pac–12 Championship still has only a single source, but was accepted from draft space anyway by SwisterTwister. Anyone can add sources to that article if they want to. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 23:57, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Please don't Delete this article 2600:8803:7A00:19:F9E8:259A:179F:F5C1 (talk) 00:23, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

@2600:8803:7A00:19:F9E8:259A:179F:F5C1: I am not an administrator, so I cannot delete pages. If you disagree with the proposed deletion of 2017 Pac-12 Football Championship Game, you may remove the tag, but that means that I would have to start an AfD discussion instead for that article. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 17:06, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Yes I disagree with you but why don't you start an Afd discussion now. 2600:8803:7A00:19:8CE4:E923:7556:7597 (talk) 16:19, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

@2600:8803:7A00:19:8CE4:E923:7556:7597: OK, so I started an AfD at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2017 Pac-12 Football Championship Game now. You may participate there if you wish to. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 17:18, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Thank You GeoffreyT 2000. 2600:8803:7A00:19:8CE4:E923:7556:7597 (talk) 23:24, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review-Patrolling: Coordinator elections

Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Camp Vance

Thank you for catching the recreation. I had draftified it when it was just an infobox that hadn't been edited in 30 minutes to give the creator some time to prevent someone from PRODing or A3ing it. Left a note on the talk page, but they must have went ahead and created it again. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:11, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for your cleanup work on Downhill (ski competition)!

GeoffreyT2000, this is to thank you for your cleanup work on Downhill (ski competition)! No-one commented on my proposal to make the change, beforehand. Another editor pointed out that there were many disambiguation consequences, after the fact. I would have gladly done the consequent grunt work, but I'm not familiar with what tool that I would use to find the trouble spots. Perhaps you could reply to this message and point to an efficient method for doing the mopping up, so I can clean up after myself the next time. Cheers, User:HopsonRoad 14:15, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

@HopsonRoad: I did not edit that article, but instead did a round-robin move of Downhill (disambiguation) with Downhill, as requested by Natg 19 at WP:RM/TR. It just happens that you have edited the disambiguation page that linked to the article you moved, and it was swapped with the redirect you created while moving. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 00:41, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter No.3

Hello GTrang,

Voting for coordinators has now begun HERE and will continue through/to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March. Please be sure to vote. Any registered, confirmed editor can vote. Nominations are now closed.

Still a MASSIVE backlog

We now have 803 New Page Reviewers but despite numerous appeals for help, the backlog has NOT been significantly reduced.
If you asked for the New Page Reviewer right, please consider investing a bit of time - every little helps preventing spam and trash entering the mainspace and Google when the 'NO_INDEX' tags expire.

---

Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Ultraman Tiga

Wow I'm so touched. The reason I made Tiga's page in the first place because of how that guy is one of the most popular Ultraman in history and because of fan enjoyment. I never thought that it would ended up this way. I also plan to make several more Ultraman articles due to how they were mostly lag behind in the wikipedia but my progress is slow due to college reasons.

Zero stylinx (talk) 04:56, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:May 1953

Hello, GeoffreyT2000. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "May 1953".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 17:38, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Dennis Johnson (composer)

Hello, I see you've proposed Dennis Johnson (composer) for deletion. While I agree he's not super famous, I think his noted influence on the work of La Monte Young is of interest. Kyle Gann is one of the most respected writers on minimalism and post-minimalism and thought it worth spending a great deal of time to re-create his unique piece 'November'. For me Dennis Johnson's work is like a rare flower, and is valuable solely for it's rarity. I should add I have no personal interest in it, beyond an interest in the development of minimal music. If it's deleted fewer people will know about it, but I already know so won't be unduly troubled. All the bestLuciferfan (talk) 10:56, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

You are welcome.

Don't hesitate to fix it yourself. Thanks in advance for your useful cooperation. Pldx1 (talk) 19:57, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

@Pldx1: You created Sister Mary Cordia Karl, which I have added a linkrot tag to. Anyone can fix bare URLs, including me. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 14:57, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Withdraw?

Suspect you need to correct your mistake here with apologies Victuallers (talk) 10:11, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Your close of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of the ultra-prominent summits of North America

I think you may not have captured the consensus. Per NoGhost, the consensus seems to merge List of Ultras of North America into List of the ultra-prominent summits of North America, not the other way around. —hike395 (talk) 04:49, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Reason being...?

Per WP:RMT, you've yet to elaborate as to why Mark McGowan (politician) should not be moved to Mark McGowan per WP:PTOPIC, and hence a contested technical request has been put forward. Please explain? —MelbourneStar☆^talk 11:02, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

@MelbourneStar: I have answered it in Special:Diff/770399690. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 04:58, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Kaatru Veliyidai soundtrack

I have created a page in wikipedia can u please add a corresponding cover for it Pr2152000 (talk) 12:44, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

The page is called Kaatru Veliyidai soundtrack Pr2152000 (talk) 12:44, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Help with Maritz, LLC article

Greetings! On behalf of Maritz, LLC, I am trying to update the company's Wikipedia article. I have submitted an edit request here and posted requests for help at WikiProject Companies, the Articles for Creation help desk, WikiProject United States, and the talk pages of a couple individual Wikipedia editors, but so far no one has responded to the edit request to add a corporate overview section and information about Maritz's current and former subsidiaries.

I've proposed text for the article here. I realize this is a proposed article expansion, and not an Articles for Creation submission, but this major addition to the article is similar to an Articles for Creation review, so I am reaching out to a few Articles for Creation participants, such as yourself, to see if someone will review the proposed addition for accuracy and neutrality. Is this something you might be willing and able to help with? If you are not interested, that's alright, I am just not sure where else to ask for help for the edit request I submitted over a month ago. Thanks for considering. MadisonfromStanding (talk) 15:49, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Question about article review

You reviewed my draft article generating function transformation recently to move it into official article space (thank you for doing so). May I ask what else is missing, or needs to improved within the article for it to get a higher grade on the quality scale? I fixed the two issues about it being an orphan and about it not having an introduction section. Do you still see places where there is irrelevant or missing material, or insufficient citations? I'm asking because I want to improve the article and there do not currently seem to be other active contributors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxieds (talk • contribs) 19:52, 30 March 2017 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

When you do go for WP:RfA, please ping me and I will co-nominate you.

Bearian (talk) 16:40, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

@Bearian: I'm not interested in RfA right now. I will when I have time. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:35, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Reference for article

Hello ,

Can you please help me and tell me how I improve https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shantanu_Arora this article .I have no news paper reference for this article . So can you me other techniques .--Aliva Sahoo (talk) 17:16, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q1 2017

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter
Volume 10, No. 1 — 1st Quarter, 2017
Previous issue | Index | Next issue

Project At a Glance
As of Q1 2017, the project has:

• 211 Featured Articles
• 70 Featured Lists
• 11 Featured Topics
• 1 Featured Portals

• 28 Featured Pictures
• 1,172 Good Articles
• 23 Good Topics

---

Content

• Changes to Featured and Good content
• News items and announcements

• Interview with Coin945 and Deltasim about the edutainment video gaming genre

---

Project Navigation

• VG Project Main pages

  • Main project – talk
  • Project category – talk
  • Portal – talk

  VG Project Departments

  • Assessment
  • Reference library – talk
  • Newsletter – talk

To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:39, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

7 history-merge requests

• Please see Wikipedia:Requests for history merge#New requests. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:53, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Tell Your Friends (The Weeknd song)

Hi,

You applied a {{histmerge}} to this article regarding:

• Tell Your Friends (The Weeknd song )
• Tell Your Friends ( The Weeknd song )

but both of these articles are recent duplicates of Tell Your Friends (The Weeknd song) and there's no need to merge the history for attempts to create duplicate articles. It's not as if these were two independent articles that had different content that was merged into one article.

So, instead, I nominated the two duplicate articles for deletion under WP:A10.–CaroleHenson (talk) 15:02, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Anthony Appleyard - I see that you have been involved in managing requests for histmerges, so I have added you to this discussion as well. I am a little confused why there would be a histmerge for these two recent duplicate articles. Perhaps I'm missing something.–CaroleHenson (talk) 15:07, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

• @CaroleHenson: I have history-merged Tell Your Friends ( The Weeknd song ) to Tell Your Friends (The Weeknd song ) to Tell Your Friends (The Weeknd song). This article had clearly been cut-and-paste moved twice. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:13, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
  • Anthony Appleyard - Thanks for your response. Again, though, I am confused - and very likely missing something. If someone creates an new article that is essentially a duplicate of the original article that has some errors, why add the history that reflects those differences and then back them back out again? Would your process normally result in the removal of the duplicate articles?–CaroleHenson (talk) 16:29, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Socialist Voice (disambiguation)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Socialist Voice (disambiguation), GeoffreyT2000!

Wikipedia editor Triptothecottage just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for your work!

To reply, leave a comment on Triptothecottage's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Triptothecottage (talk) 01:54, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Request on 12:59:36, 25 April 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Fiyin Adeyera

• Fiyin Adeyera (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Kola Aina (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Please can I be given an example of a secondary source, because the my references,as regards my article are secondary (in my own opinion). Thank you

Fiyin Adeyera (talk) 12:59, 25 April 2017 (UTC)

Concensus reached for move

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Paeksang_Arts_Awards#Requested_move_12_April_2017 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 112.203.221.62 (talk) 05:08, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

@112.203.221.62: I have relisted the RM at Talk:Baeksang Arts Awards#‎Requested move 12 April 2017 (formerly Talk:Paeksang Arts Awards#‎Requested move 12 April 2017) in order to obtain a clearer consensus. The RM was then closed by MSGJ. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 02:12, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Portal

Hey, when you get a chance can you take a look at this edit? It seems the Portal:Current events/April 2017/Sidebar is a red link and I'm not sure what went wrong. APK whisper in my ear 01:21, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

@AgnosticPreachersKid: I have created Portal:Current events/April 2017/Sidebar, like I have been doing for earlier months. I have clicked the "thank" link next to your edit in the history of Portal:Current events/April 2017 to send you a "thanks" notification, and that leads to this message here. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:13, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for your help. APK whisper in my ear 07:03, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

As Time Goes By

I have to disagree with redirecting As Time Goes By (TV series) to a section of a disambiguation page - it's very confusing to be redirected to a section. Since the Canadian series is very minor compared to the British series and I would prefer to have it redirect to As Time Goes By (UK TV series), which has the Canada show in the "About" header. What do you think? - DavidWBrooks (talk) 19:56, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

@DavidWBrooks: I have nominated As Time Goes By (Canadian TV series) for AfD. But per WP:INCOMPDAB, it's OK to redirect to a dab page. If the Canadian series article gets deleted, then the UK series article will be moved back to the original title, As Time Goes By (TV series), instead of the redirect being retargeted. I also noticed that 2601:8C:4001:DCB9:E042:9F0C:5E6:3C3B removed rcat templates from the redirect, so I have then restored them. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 23:43, 4 May 2017 (UTC)

OK, although that seems like a lot of unnecessary work! - DavidWBrooks (talk) 00:02, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Actually, I have reverted the move of the UK series article. However, per WP:NOTBROKEN, I will not revert the AWB link corrections. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 16:07, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

History-merge query

• Please see Wikipedia:Requests for history merge#Queried requests. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 05:12, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

File:X-Day logo.png

You are misunderstanding what {{orphaned non-free revisions}} means. The template means that a non-free file has multiple revisions and that all revisions (except possibly for the current revision) are unused. Since we don't keep unused non-free files, the template tells that all old revisions should be deleted one week after tagging.

The template says nothing about the current revision of the file. If the current revision happens to be unused, then this is indicated by the template {{di-orphaned fair use}}, which asks for complete deletion of the file.

Also, the file isn't unfree. It's a mistagged {{PD-textlogo}}. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:01, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - Newsletter No.4

Hello GTrang,

Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have 803 reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just 55 reviews, the 22,000 backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!

But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.

Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE.

---

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Jump to

Template:Jump to has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 16:10, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Response to tips on how to move page.

Thanks for telling me how to do that shift. I had not known that. sincerely, smithriedelSmithriedel 21:50, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Anthony G. Jay, June 13 rejection

To review, here is your rejection statement to my article "Anthony G. Jay": "Please add reliable sources. Interviews, Amazon, YouTube, and the company's website do not establish notability." First, I believe everything in this "Anthony G. Jay" page is reliable and the references prove this on many levels. Notability and reliability are two different issues - I'm sure we can agree on that - and I don't think reliability should be questioned nor should it be lumped in here with this rejection. If you disagree, I'm ok with that but would appreciate a 3rd party opinion on this. Secondly, regarding "notability": while I agree that amazon, youtube, and corporate websites do not necessarily establish notability, interviews are clearly different. Please reconsider this rejection with this important piece of information: the interviews featuring Dr. Anthony G. Jay are podcasts with 10's and 100's of thousands of downloads per episode. The "Primal Blueprint Podcast" that interviews Anthony G. Jay may even have millions of downloads, as might Ben Greenfield Fitness. This is far more substantial than traditional media outlets such as CNN, etc. The links to about a dozen of such interviews are compiled here and they are well referenced on the Anthony G. Jay page as you know: http://www.ajconsultingcompany.com/podcast.html. Overall, what I believe this indicates is that the audience of Dr. Anthony G. Jay is in the millions, which is clearly notable. The citations such as company websites, etc. (Dr. Anthony G. Jay is a President of an international non-profit, very well known overseas) are less about notability and more about personal history and important career information. That being said, even the non-profit that Dr. Anthony G. Jay presides over has a notable Advisory Board (a former Boston Judge, famous scientists, CEO's, etc.), which supplements the notability of Anthony G. Jay (which is being questioned), as seen here: http://www.imrco.org/advisory-board.html In summary, please reconsider this rejection or request an unbiased third party to investigate. Thank you. Sciencewoke (talk) 03:40, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

@Sciencewoke: Your request for a Third Opinion has been declined because 3O isn't really for appeals from draftspace advice. Please see the header on the article draft page for your options. However, remember this: What you're getting in the draftspace is advice, not a judgment. You have the option of moving your draft into mainspace (or at least you will once you have enough edits and time to be autoconfirmed). Once it's there, it may well be nominated for deletion if the advice that you've been given is correct (as I believe it is), but that's your choice: Follow the procedures set out in the header and try to improve the article so that it's clearly notable if that is possible or take it live and hope that it's not deleted. All the stuff you mentioned above, including the number of podcast downloads, is largely irrelevant to Wikipedia notability, which is a defined term here. See WP:BIO for the notability standards for individuals and see the verifiability policy for what Wikipedia defines to be a reliable source. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 22:23, 21 June 2017 (UTC) (Not watching this page)

@TransporterMan: Thank you. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 01:43, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Opporty (website) move

Hi, I reverted your move on this while the article was still at AfD. I think it makes sense to keep the article at the name it had when it was nominated, and to move it if it survives. I agree with you the dab is unnecessary, but think it is better to wait it out in this case. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:24, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

01:22:39, 18 June 2017 review of submission by Rumandru

• Rumandru (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Fightmag (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello,

Thank you for taking your time and reviewing the draft. Could you please review the stands below and advise if any of this content should be used in the article to improve it.

It is understood that for Wikipedia the first step to seek the reliable sources for the subject is Google News. Fightmag is included in Google News, since it is a media itself.. Therefore it is cited throughout Wikipedia, which is understood to make it (Fightmag) a reliable source for numerous other articles on Wikipedia. Please advise if it is correct.

In regards to the comment that Only trivial mentions and the subject's own website (a primary source) - The following reference covers the history of the subject, but it is outlined as 'trivial'. In addition the source (World Kickboxing Network) used as a reference is considered as one of the largest organizations in the industry where Fightmag operates.

It appears that one of the major stands for notability of Fightmag, is that it is a unique and the first online magazine out of Australia (that is fully dedicated to combat sports), that particularly covers the sport of Muay Thai internationally; occupies arguably over 50% of all news that appear in Google News (which is the first step for seeking reliable sources on Wikipedia). Isn't it some sort of cliche, that the subject of an article draft (Fightmag) is a reliable source for other articles on Wikipedia (providing them a reference towards their notability), however itself it is not considered as notable, although it is unique out of Australia and one of a few worldwide, as outlined above?

In other words, if Fightmag didn't exist, numerous articles on Wikipedia wouldn't be able to cite it as a reference, which ultimately would result in a lack of the reliable sources for such articles, since Fightmag appears as one of only a few that deeply cover the industry, particularly Muay Thai? Doesn't it make it (important) notable by the definition eg noted as a reliable source and/or reference in terms of it (Fightmag) being a media included Google News, which is a step one in Wikipedia for seeking reliable source? Please advise.

Sorry for repeating things, it just one connects to another.

In addition, there are numerous included articles on Wikipedia that cover similar subjects (but in different industries, not combat sports) that have even less references, such as BAK_(magazine), Mida_(website), Mzansi_Hive. There is indeed an outline on some of them that such articles require an improvement, however they have been published on Wikipedia. Doesn't it create a precedent?

Thank you for your time and advises for the draft of the article in regards to how to improve it so it is eligible for acceptance.

References

Certain contributions and deletions

Hello there can we discuss some changes you have made on a music related page? Would like to understand/know more about your knowledge in the field. Thanks! Vitolito888 (talk) 20:38, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

@Vitolito888: The only article you edited so far is Grateful (DJ Khaled album). I did edit one of the pages linked in that article, Kevin Cossom, and the edit disambiguated a link using WP:AWB following a requested move discussion at Talk:Avant (singer)#Requested move 15 June 2017. Other than that, there is nothing else I could say here. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 23:33, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Edit KC page

Thank you for replying quickly. By doing that said edit, it seems that all of KC s song writing credits have disappeared of the page. Could you please verify if you can retrieve those? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vitolito888 (talk • contribs) 19:09, 27 June 2017 (UTC)