Evangp

Speedy deletion nomination of Antrim Forum

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Antrim Forum, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. DES ^(talk) 15:28, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Kings Hall

The article was cut from an existing article without consultation, take it to the Belle Vue talk page or come up with some new information. J3Mrs (talk) 12:35, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Why should you get your way over mine? Evangp (talk) 12:37, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Please do not remove referenced and relevant information from well-written articles to make a new one. This is not how Wikipedia works. It is not a question of getting my own way it is simply that the paragraph you removed is an important part of a featured article and one FA criteria is that it must be comprehensive. The redirect sends a reader to the same information, I don't see your problem. Take it to talk. J3Mrs (talk) 12:41, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi, and sorry to pile on here, but you must make sure that if, in future, you copy and paste material from one article to another, you ensure there is an audit trail for contributions, such as linking to the history of the original article in the edit summary of the new article. The copy and paste you carried out is not in compliance with our licencing terms and is technically a copyright violation as it stands. Sorry to add to the list of complaints about your editing too, I know it's not nice when it feels everybody is shouting at you. Nick (talk) 12:58, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Kiel Opera House

There are at least two different houses, - an we think about disambiguation? Theater Kiel, the opera house (Opernhaus Kiel) would be in English Kiel Opera House, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:52, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Hoch Auditorium

You appear to have improperly split Budig Hall into Hoch Auditorium. Please note that since both are the same building, which was rebuilt after a fire. Therefore, the name of the article should match the current name of the subject matter—in this case, Budig Hall. That article can then contain a boldface reference to the former name, along with explanation. Readers searching for the former name should be redirected to the new name, where they can see the explanation.

Please discuss splits like this on the talk page before making such major changes yourself. There are several things that must be considered. For example, after your changes, how would readers who land on the resultant article know that there's another, updated one? No link was provided. Furthermore, the article's history was not moved along with its text. This is standard practice on Wikipedia. Therefore, I will be reverting your good faith changes to both pages. Thanks for understanding. – voidxor ^{(talk | contrib)} 08:21, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Japan Jam

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Japan Jam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.), but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Gbawden (talk) 07:11, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Japan Jam

'''Japan Jam''' was a two-day [[rock festival]] held 4–5 August 1979 on the island of [[Enoshima]] in [[Fujisawa, Kanagawa|Fujisawa]], Japan. Some of the performers included [[The Beach Boys]], [[Heart (band)|Heart]], [[Firefall]] and [[TKO (band)|TKO]].<ref>{{cite web|author=|url=http://blog.livedoor.jp/heavenwindslt/archives/5177439.html |title=多趣味なアナログ親父 : ７９年ジャパン・ジャム 1979'AUGUST JAPAN JAM ビーチ・ボーイズが観れなかった！ |publisher=Blog.livedoor.jp |date=2012-02-07 |accessdate=2014-06-01}}</ref>

==References== {{Reflist}}

[[Category:Rock festivals in Japan]]

Have you thought of using your sandbox for editing this article? If you want me to look over it, let me know. seicer | talk | contribs 19:59, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 28 April

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Kings Hall, Manchester page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Kings Hall, Manchester

Do not try to recreate that article again. Consider this your final warning. Eric Corbett 18:13, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

It was explained to you further up this page why you should not recreate this article. J3Mrs (talk) 18:41, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Kiel opera

Care to write a disambiguation for Kiel opera house? Many people mean the house in Kiel, Theater Kiel, see my talk. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:51, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

• But Theater Kiel is just that, Theater Kiel. Peabody Opera House was formerly called Kiel Opera House. Theater Kiel was never technically called the Kiel Opera House. Evangp (talk) 01:03, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Sunrise Musical Theater

Hello Evangp. I performed the move, but notice that the original redirect had Category:Event venues established in 1976. Consider if that information should be added to the renamed article. Just letting you know because the redirect got deleted in the move process so there is no longer any record. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 18:35, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Roman theatre of Orange

Please don't be silly. It is perfectly clear what the policy is in such cases. Johnbod (talk) 04:09, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

A page you started (San Diego Civic Theatre) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating San Diego Civic Theatre, Evangp!

Wikipedia editor Callmemirela just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

The article is short. Could you please add more content?

To reply, leave a comment on Callmemirela's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nomination of Little John's Farm for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Little John's Farm is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Little John's Farm until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rayman60 (talk) 19:59, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

Re: Izod Center

Why did you revert my sourced contributions to Meadowlands Arena? ViperSnake151  Talk  04:46, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Evangp. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

February 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Zénith Paris, without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please at least attempt to provide sources to justify your claim, as there are (literally) thousands of references that disagree with you. Referencing an outdated image DOES NOT support your claim. Itsbydesign (talk) 13:09, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Kiel Opera House

Hi, in response to your edit summary "there is a Kiel Opera House" - yes, that's precisely why I'm creating a page for it. It was built in 1902. The article you're attempting to redirect the namespace to is about Peabody Opera House, which from what I read in the article, has changed its name. 1-555-confide (talk) 15:51, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

There's also Theater Kiel, confusing, - perhaps the redirect Kiel Opera should go there, as active. What do you think? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:12, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

I see that said so before ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:13, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Theater Kiel is the theater company, not the building. Theater Kiel performs in three venues, of which Kiel Opera House is just one - the main one. Help me see if there's a valid problem here. 1-555-confide (talk) 16:26, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Jai-Alai Fronton

This redirect needs to be fixed. A jai-alai fronton, by itself, is a generic term for any venue pertaining to that sport. It should not redirect to Casino Miami. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 22:21, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

OK, I understand. Evangp (talk) 00:21, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017

Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you.

These unnecessary article moves appear a common theme amongst your edits. As previously mentioned by myself and other editors, please provide a third-party reputable source for article moves. Using justification such as "real" and "it's in the image" does not provide weight to your edits.

Also, providing sources avoids alleviates edit warring (as is the case with Zénith Paris). As it states in both the English and French wikis, "Le Zenith" is the common name given amongst all the venues that bear said title. I highly doubt French or international media refer to the Paris venue (and only the Paris venue) when using the Zenith title. If this is not the case, provide a source.Itsbydesign (talk) 03:40, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

The Zenith in Paris was the first Zenith and was originally called simply "Le Zénith" not Zénith de Paris. Evangp (talk) 13:59, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Again, your "argument" is based upon images whereas others are referring written sources. It may be a common name but it was never an "official" name. There are 17 "Zenith" in France. So, I have worded the text of the article to reflect so because this is slowing becoming absurd. For future reference, I highly suggest that if you would like to contribute to his cite, please reference written reliable third party sources. Also, when you go through your history and just blindly revert edits, it doesn't help your case. Itsbydesign (talk) 00:39, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Edge (Palo Alto, California)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Edge (Palo Alto, California) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, society, or group, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. — IVORK _Discuss 23:36, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

Big Freedom

Hey Evangp,

I just found Große Freiheit 36 while doing new page patrol, and I just translated the German article on top of the English one because it had more info. Just letting you know because you'd been working on it. --Slashme (talk) 07:40, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Alrosa Villa

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Alrosa Villa, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jax 0677 (talk) 14:01, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Agora

Hi! I can't understand why you would want to move-war at Agora – that's behaviour that's quite likely to lead you into trouble if it continues. Just in case you don't already know this: we have instructions on how to list controversial and potentially controversial moves. It should be pretty obvious that a move that's already been reverted once is not uncontroversial. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 14:40, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

I have reverted the page move. If you believe you have a case, use the process explained at WP:RM#CM to initiate a formal discussion. Further move-warring will be considered disruptive. Favonian (talk) 17:01, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

The Rave/Eagles Club

No proof of? An image? A name? The only difference between the two edits are an image and a name. You have been told this several times in the past. If you disagree with an edit, providing a source is your strongest argument. You appear to be blindly reverting edits because of how you "feel". This tends to be your modus operandi and several editors have warned you to discontinue this behavior. For the final time, I highly suggest you begin providing reliable sources for anything you include that can create debate. If your actions continue negatively, I will progress to the next step. Itsbydesign (talk) 00:21, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

show me anything, ANYTHING that states it was ever called "Central Park Athletic Club and Entertainment Center", also it was never called "Milwaukee eagles club" only simply "eagles club". you my friend are reverting my edits just to get me angry! I know it! Evangp (talk) 00:28, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

What you have failed to do in months, I completed in 10 minutes. Your behavior is being cataloged and if you chose do continue down this path, I will bring it to the attention of the administrators. Itsbydesign (talk) 00:39, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

I will make a compromise since now u r doing it right, I see your proof, so check my next edit and see if it's ok. Evangp (talk) 00:44, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Palais des Sports (Besançon)

Hi !

For my information only, why "Palais des Sports (Besançon)" is better than "Palais des sports Ghani-Yalouz" which is the correct actual name of the arena? Because there's the name of the city in the 1st solution?

Thanks--LeFnake (talk) 09:21, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Evangp. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Peppermint Beach Club

A tag has been placed on Peppermint Beach Club requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Non-Notable article on club lacking significant coverage in reliable sources.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. HeyLetgoletgo (talk) 09:24, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Catalyst (nightclub)

Hello Evangp,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Catalyst (nightclub) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Regards, SshibumXZ (Talk) (Contributions). 03:14, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of B'Ginnings for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article B'Ginnings is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/B'Ginnings (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 00:02, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

ThunderDome vs Thunderdome

Your argument and the notion that it was "usually" spelled a certain way is wrong on many levels.

• The St. Petersburg City Council voted to change the name to the "ThunderDome" on August 6, 1993. This change was in the works for some time prior.
• That lasted until October 3, 1996 when Tampa Bay Devil Rays owner Vince Naimoli announced that the team had signed a new naming rights deal with Tropicana Dole Beverages North America.(in Tampa Tribune on Oct 4, 1996) -even referred to old name as the ThunderDome in these reports-
• The spelling was in the same spirit as the previously named SkyDome in Toronto.
• The official logo of the building during that time had it spelled "ThunderDome" or "THUNDERDOME" with the T and D as overall larger letters than the others. (Tampa Tribune on August 6, 1993)
• The misspellings can largely be attributed to reporters in the early days of the name change. These are errors by reporters and nothing else. They even took place on the day the city council was poised to approve the name change.(St. Petersburg Times on Aug 5, 1993) Then sporadically thereafter by out of town reporters.(Sun-Sentinel on Sept 26, 1993)
• Both the Tampa Bay Storm and the Tampa Bay Lightning referred to it as "ThunderDome" in all of their printed media. (Anecdotally, I happen to be a Tampa Bay Lightning season ticket holder and have been since their first season. I have ticket stubs and other materials from them that support this)
• Most importantly, I'm sure you know that it is against Wikipedia policy to make edits without any reference. All of my edits on that page had references, your revert does not, and is based solely on you saying "it was usually without the capitol D" -which is unreferenced and more importantly, not the case. As a side note, I spent this morning doing a cursory review of numerous news stories on newspapers.com from that 1993-1996 time frame. The vast majority of news reports involving that stadium were in fact spelled ThunderDome.
• Regardless of what people wrongly called it (or spelled it), calling it something other than its given name on Wikipedia would be akin to referring to the Chicago Bears' home stadium as "Soldiers'" Field or the Chicago White Sox old stadium as "Cominsky" Park.
• In conclusion, I'm not interested in an edit war. I made good-faith edits with supporting third-party references, per Wikipedia rules. I've added six additional references here to support those changes. Unless you can cite actual sources that support your claim as to the other spelling, I would ask that you please revert the article back to my changes. Regards -Creativewill (talk) 18:24, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

References

Nomination of Graham Central Station (Phoenix, Arizona) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Graham Central Station (Phoenix, Arizona) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graham Central Station (Phoenix, Arizona) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MB 04:35, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Concert venue notability

Evan. I came across the Century Theatre (Buffalo, New York) article earlier. This is an article you created and have been the primary author of. I had previously nominated another article where you were also the primary author of an article for AfD. Because of this, I felt it would be rude of me to nominate a second article before looking at your contributions and speaking at least a little with you. I note that you returned to the project specifically to work on concert venue articles and, in fact, almost all of the articles you create are on this type of topic. I want to avoid making it seem like your contributions to this one area are unwelcome.

All that said, however, I hove some concerns about how you apply the notability guidelines to these venues. I see from the comments on this page that I am not the only one that has had concerns about individual venues. What I would like to ask you, therefore, is what do you think counts as "notable" for a nightclub or concert venue.

Based on the articles you've created that I checked, you seem to consider that having hosted a notable music act makes a place notable. I don't think that this would be widely-accepted as most editors accept that notability is WP:NOTINHERITED in this manner. I could very likely be mis-characterizing your views by phrasing it that way, though, hence my question. To put it another way, do you agree that the general notability guideline is satisfied by "Notable band X played at..." type articles?

Thanks for your attention, and I look forward to your response. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 22:21, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

OK, I will be more careful before creating new articles in the future. Evangp (talk) 22:31, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Sting (nightclub)

Hello, Evangp. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, The Sting (nightclub), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:30, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of The Sting (nightclub) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Sting (nightclub) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sting (nightclub) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:32, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Starlite Music Theatre

Hello, Evangp. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Starlite Music Theatre, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:48, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Starlite Music Theatre for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Starlite Music Theatre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Starlite Music Theatre until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:07, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Olympia Bruno Coqatrix

Do you understand that wikipedia articles of music halls, venues etc bare names as the "full name of the building, hall etc..". "Olympia" is commonly known name of Olympia Bruno Coqiatrix only in english speaking countries. Whole Paris and all people that performed there, especially Dalida, always referred to it as Olympia Bruno Coqatrix.... Will we delete "Carnegie" from "Carnegie hall" because it is called after Andrew Carnegie. Will your rename "Anna Meares Velodrome" in Chandler, to "Velodrome (Chandler)" ?? Or Empire State Building article on wiki to "Empire state" just because people refer to it like that..? Look at the Willis Tower. After Sears company sold it, wiki article changed it's iconic name of Sears Tower. I think that this theme should be left to us, Parisians, to decide.Dalida Editor _{please ping or message me}' 16:18, 3 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Evangp. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Club Pages

Hi Evangp - I see that you cover music venues on Wikipedia too. You recently deleted some information and a source I contributed to the Tower Theater page. I added that info to the lede because it speaks to notability and because there was a message at the top of the page saying it needed more sourced info. Just so you know, it wasn't random puffery...I've never been to the place... Lhcollins (talk) 01:41, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

I just read through some of the messages above. Besides awards from respected publications and organizations, I also use coverage by major magazines and newspapers to demonstrate notability...though it looks as if you are usually successful if not highly prolific in publishing your pages despite the conversations above! Lhcollins (talk) 01:49, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Bond International Casino

Hello Evangp,

I see that you reverted my move of Bonds International Casino to Bond International Casino, and marked it as a minor edit. You wrote in the edit comment, "i believe the nightclub, which the article targets, was known as such". While you may be correct that it was known as Bond's, as I added to the article text, the actual name of the venue, as supported in both the references cited in the article, and in what I wrote on the article's talk page, is Bond International Casino. This is the reason I did the Move action. Please review your modifications to my edit, as your belief that the nightclub was known as such is not supported by the WP:RS sources cited nor any of the Clash ticket images that are available online which were printed by the actual venue. All of them say "Bond International Casino". I would appreciate if you would revert your own edits as they are contrary to the cited secondary sources as well as my own research on the subject. Xblkx (talk) 09:52, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

What about this ticket? https://www.ebay.ie/itm/1981-June-16-SOFTWHITE-UNDERBELLY-Concert-Ticket-Stub-VG-4-0-Bonds-Casino-NYC-/302678933092?hash=item467911fe64 Evangp (talk) 10:35, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for your affirmative response to my edit request. That ticket you just showed is a counterexample as many of the Clash posters (especially b&w photocopied ones) are, but that stub looks like a Ticketron stub where someone, somewhere would have probably been typing text in to the machine for what would be printed on a blank ticket and I have no idea where the text guidance would have originated. I looked at a lot of ticket stubs and other printed documents before I suggested the move to Bond International Casino. It seems that nearly all professionally printed tickets where customized blanks were premade and then the seat and cost info was printed onto them with a line printer, and professionally printed flyers and posters have it as Bond International Casino (consistent with the article references plus these items: https://www.nyhistory.org/exhibit/bond-international-180217 and http://www.theyshootactorsdontthey.com/2011/06/bonds-casino.html). Interesting that an investigation into my own archival website [1] that's cited in the article led me to dig deep into this article subject and discover I had also made this same common mistake. Cheers Xblkx (talk) 12:30, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Kongreßhalle

Bau Kongresshalle

This night I was reading on the choice for the city of Bonn as the capital of Germany in the late 40s. This picture was used on an article you created, named "Kongresshalle". Strangely, the picture is not on the construction of a congress hall: it was intended to be constructed as a parliament, but was later transformed into a radio broadcasting building. I think this is a mistake, this picture next to it. Where is this so-called Kongresshalle in Frankfurt? From what year to what year did it organize performances? I think the source you used is on the Jahrhunderthalle, but please can you provide more context as your article is missing quite some information. Where? When? And, what did it really look like? If you could answer these questions, as you were trying to revert Huon, that would be very welcome. Thanks in advance. Leo CXXIV (talk) 11:23, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

Why do you keep reverting, if questions like the ones above are asked to you? Come on, this is bizarre: you are not alone here, pay more attention to others opinions. Leo CXXIV (talk) 18:27, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Stadion Galgenwaard

It used to have the name Stadion Nieuw Galgenwaard, so I think this info was totally correct. Why this edit? [2] -- Leo CXXIV (talk) 11:27, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

(https://www.fcutrecht.nl/club/stadion In augustus 1982 werd Stadion Nieuw Galgenwaard in gebruik genomen.) -- Leo CXXIV (talk) 11:39, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Brewery District Pavilion

The article Brewery District Pavilion has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail notability guidelines at WP:NBUILDING

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ifnord (talk) 21:45, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Brewery District Pavilion for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brewery District Pavilion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brewery District Pavilion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ifnord (talk) 23:20, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Ways to improve Doshin Hall

Hello, Evangp,

Thank you for creating Doshin Hall.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for creating

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Abishe}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Abishe (talk) 09:41, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Kyoritsu Kodo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kyoritsu Kodo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyoritsu Kodo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ─ ReconditeRodent « talk · contribs » 19:09, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Messehallen

The article Messehallen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No proof given since disputed in 2016. "Messehallen" is just German for "Fairground". "Hamburg Messe" is the correct name (see picture) for the fairground and operating company. See talk page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Aeroid (talk) 16:58, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Diamond Hall moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Diamond Hall, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. JavaHurricane 03:57, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

IMP Hall moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, IMP Hall, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 06:52, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Brewery District Pavilion for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brewery District Pavilion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brewery District Pavilion (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:22, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

GEHA Field at Arrowhead Stadium

This is literally no different then when the Superdome was renamed Mercedes-Benz Superdome. It’s still primarily called the Superdome but the page reflects the official change. Please leave the article name alone.--Rockchalk717 00:04, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Palais des Sports (Besançon) 2

Apologies, I had assumed that the (Besançon) here was a Wikipedia disambiguator, rather than part of the common name of the stadium, which is why I renamed the article to Palais des sports Ghani-Yalouz. If the common name had been simply Palais des Sport, then that is clearly not available as an article name, and we would be forced to use an alternative. Given that, normal practice on WP is that it is better to use a fuller but less common name than to invent an articial disambiguation name. I've amended the article to try and make sure nobody else makes the same mistake. -- chris_j_wood (talk) 14:28, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Glädjehuset

Hello, Evangp

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username DoubleGrazing, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Glädjehuset, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|DoubleGrazing}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:42, 24 October 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Glädjehuset for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Glädjehuset is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Glädjehuset until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:04, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve Alte Feuerwache

Hello, Evangp,

Thank you for creating Alte Feuerwache.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for the article! However, how does this music venue/former fire station pass the general notability guideline WP:GNG, which requires multiple independent, reliable, secondary sources demonstrating WP:SIGCOV? The current ref is a database-like site (non-SIGCOV), my WP:BEFORE search mainly found trivial mentions or routine property details, see 1, 2, 3, [3]. The refs for the French version is slightly better, but it also just has two decent refs excepting the external links. However, do they discuss this in sufficient detail to be SIGCOV? Many thanks!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|VickKiang}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

VickKiang (talk) 02:08, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Théâtre Libre (performing arts center) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Théâtre Libre (performing arts center), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:47, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Burgemeester Damen Sportpark

The article Burgemeester Damen Sportpark has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article does not match the notability guidelines for geographic features. The part I would like to point you to is right under WP:GEOROAD the "No Inherited Notability." The only thing that makes this park notable is that there was a festival there, and the guidelines say that it can not inherit notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of De Anza Theatre for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article De Anza Theatre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/De Anza Theatre until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Belichickoverbrady (talk) 18:59, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Shrine Exposition Hall for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shrine Exposition Hall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shrine Exposition Hall until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 00:57, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Daddy's Dance Hall moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Daddy's Dance Hall, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:13, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

April 2023

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Dominion Voting Systems, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. LilianaUwU ^{(talk / contributions)} 10:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

You and I both know I did not vandalize. You simply don't like what I wrote. Evangp (talk) 10:52, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

It is disgusting what is happening in the world, You should be ashamed of yourself for contributing to the horrific lies. Evangp (talk) 10:57, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

See below, don't use WIkipedia to promote conspiracy theories, and don't attack other editors again. If anything like this happens again, you will lose editing privileges. Acroterion (talk) 12:05, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Yeah, sure. I did not attack any editor. Evangp (talk) 17:36, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

you promote conspiracy theories, not me. get your facts straight buddy boy. Evangp (talk) 21:16, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

you promote conspiracy theories, not me. get your facts straight buddy boy. Evangp (talk) 21:17, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Acroterion (talk) 12:03, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Théâtre Libre (performing arts center) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Théâtre Libre (performing arts center) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Théâtre Libre (performing arts center) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:20, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Daddy's Dance Hall

Hello, Evangp. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Daddy's Dance Hall, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Santa Cruz County Fairgrounds for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Santa Cruz County Fairgrounds is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santa Cruz County Fairgrounds until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

A MINOTAUR (talk) 23:21, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nagoya Civic Assembly Hall

The article Nagoya Civic Assembly Hall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

NN building, fails WP:NBUILD. -

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. UtherSRG (talk) 12:34, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Nagoya Civic Assembly Hall for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nagoya Civic Assembly Hall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nagoya Civic Assembly Hall until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 10:37, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

December 2023

Hello, I'm Sumanuil. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Strange Affair (album) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 03:30, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

February 2024

You can't just say an album is notable. We can't take your word for it. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 06:56, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Many say this album is notable. You are the only one saying it's not notable. Evangp (talk) 07:31, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

THEN PROVE IT. Provide your sources. And I am NOT the only one. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 22:32, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

No, I am not going to prove anything, I am not wasting anymore of my time with this. This is not important enough to deal with a total fool like yourself. Evangp (talk) 00:56, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

You have been here long enough, and warned previously, that personal attacks will lead to a block. Is there any reason why you shouldn't be blocked now?-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 01:02, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

You want to block me for calling someone a fool? Give me a break. Evangp (talk) 01:21, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

You could choose to strike it.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 01:25, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Vestlandhalle for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vestlandhalle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vestlandhalle until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Boleyn (talk) 09:02, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Station (Florida)

The article The Station (Florida) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Cannot find any reliable sources that go in-depth about the subject. Barely any passing mentions.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Mike 🗩 15:45, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of The Station (Florida) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Station (Florida) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Station (Florida) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

-- Mike 🗩 19:03, 19 April 2024 (UTC)