Dilipankhiya

Welcome!

Hello, Dilipankhiya, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Longhair\^talk 14:03, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Sushmita Chadha for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sushmita Chadha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sushmita Chadha until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Longhair\^talk 05:21, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Sources

Hello, all articles need clear sources, and for biographies of living people they need to be WP:INLINECITED. Can you please add your sources to Ishwarbhai Parmar? It's likely to be quickly tagged for deletion as it stands. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 08:12, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Dilipankhiya/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Dilipankhiya/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:15, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello! Dilipankhiya, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 09:15, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ishwarbhai Parmar

The article Ishwarbhai Parmar has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Boleyn (talk) 09:49, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Ishwarbhai Parmar

Hi, I'm Abishe. Dilipankhiya, thanks for creating Ishwarbhai Parmar!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix.

Hello Dilipankhiya: Enjoy the holiday season, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, Abishe (talk) 16:58, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Season's Greetings1}} to send this message

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Abishe (talk) 16:58, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rekha Arya

The article Rekha Arya has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Theroadislong (talk) 19:54, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Please quote your references.Xx236 (talk) 08:40, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Sadhu Singh Dharamsot - unreferenced.Xx236 (talk) 08:46, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sadhu Singh Dharamsot

The article Sadhu Singh Dharamsot has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one.  samee  ^talk 09:19, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Sources

Hello and thanks for creating new articles. If you work on them in draftspace or your sandbox, only moving them to mainspcw when their references are added, you'll save other editors a lot of time. Usually yours pop up for New Page Paatrollers with red writing next to them as they are unreferenced and then they are tagged for deletion.

Please add your sources to Chandan, Jaisalmer. Thanks, Boleyn (talk) 06:51, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Dharu Megh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dharu Megh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dharu Megh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  M A A Z   T A L K  13:29, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Dharu Megh, you may be blocked from editing. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:00, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

G. E. C. Wakefield

Thanks for your start with the article about Mr Wakefield. However the article is in need of sources, and I hope that you can provide such ASAP. I twice visited the Kanapura Lodge in Mysore during the 80s, and had nice chats with the manager there, a colonel Wakefield, who may have been a son to G. E. C. Wakefield, since he described his youth in north India. Dan Koehl (talk) 13:06, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Kailash Narain Haksar, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please stop creating unsourced articles. Tell us where you found the information. Without sources, you might have invented all these people for all we know. You have already been asked to provide sources for G. E. C. Wakefield. This behaviour is becoming disruptive. PamD 15:33, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Kailash Narain Haksar

Hi, I'm PamD. Dilipankhiya, thanks for creating Kailash Narain Haksar!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please provide references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

PamD 15:35, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Knowledge of English

In Elliot James Dowel Colvin you wrote "He exercised the right some years...". This means nothing in English unless you have previously defined some right (like the right to go hunting in a particular piece of land). I think you may have meant "He practiced law". If your level of knowledge of English is such that you do not recognise that this did not make sense, perhaps you would do better to edit a Wikipedia in a language with which you are more familiar. Or was this a poor machine translation from some unacknowledged source? Either way, please ensure that when you contribute to the English Wikipedia you do so in clear and understandable English. Thanks. PamD 16:04, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vijai Sharma

The article Vijai Sharma has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Theroadislong (talk) 12:15, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of A. N. Tiwari

Hello, Dilipankhiya. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, A. N. Tiwari, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want A. N. Tiwari to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

Dan Koehl (talk) 12:26, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kailash Narain Haksar

Hello, Dilipankhiya. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Kailash Narain Haksar, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Dan Koehl (talk) 12:34, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Your articles

The two new articles you've created, Information Commissioner of India and Chief Information Commissioner of India, lack sources. The articles obviously cover posts which are in need of articles but unless you add independent, verifiable, reliable sources your articles are at risk of being deleted. Please concentrate on the substance of your articles before adding the window-dressing of information boxes. Cabayi (talk) 12:36, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Vijai Sharma, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please stop creating completely unsourced articles. You have been asked repeatedly to add references. If you continue you are likely to be stopped from editing, to protect the encyclopedia. PamD 12:40, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mula Ram

The article Mula Ram has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. PamD 12:41, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hari Kishan Kaul

The article Hari Kishan Kaul has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. PamD 12:42, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hari Kishan Kaul

The article Hari Kishan Kaul has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced and poorly-written article ("He exerted the right"?).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PamD 16:36, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Rajiv Mathur. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. PamD 16:38, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rajiv Mathur

The article Rajiv Mathur has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. PamD 16:40, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Raghu Sharma (politician)

The article Raghu Sharma (politician) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 12:21, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

February 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Raghu Sharma (politician). You have been asked many times not to create unsourced articles. Please now stop, or you will be reported to WP:ANI for this continuing disruptive editing. PamD 13:34, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. PamD 08:41, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Swarm ♠ 08:45, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

• Note that specifically, this block is for the persistent creation of unsourced BLPs, as well as refusal to communicate, both of which are considered disruptive editing. Swarm ♠ 08:46, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Police Commissioner of Jaipur

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Police Commissioner of Jaipur, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. IM3847 (talk) 07:36, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

February 2018

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dilipankhiya (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

please me editing

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:53, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of G. E. C. Wakefield for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article G. E. C. Wakefield is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G. E. C. Wakefield until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PamD 20:16, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Elliot James Dowel Colvin for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elliot James Dowel Colvin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elliot James Dowel Colvin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. PamD 20:23, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Police Commissioner of Jaipur for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Police Commissioner of Jaipur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Police Commissioner of Jaipur until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 03:15, 20 March 2018 (UTC)