User talk:Das osmnezz/Archive 7

Latest comment: 1 year ago by MarchOfTheGreyhounds in topic Christian Okonkwo

Notice: You Are Now Subject to Editing Restrictions edit

  Per my earlier notice regarding discretionary sanctions and my final warning, both posted above, and due to your continued demonstration of problematic editing on BLPs, I am placing you under the following editing restrictions with immediate effect...

  • You may not directly create any article about a living or recently deceased person as defined by BLP in the mainspace of the project. Any proposed new pages must be submitted as a WP:DRAFT to WP:AFC for review and approval.
  • You may not make any edit to any article about a living or recently deceased soccer/football player without first having the edit proposed on the talk page of the article and then reviewed and approved by at least one editor with extended confirmed rights. When making an edit to a BLP article subject to this restriction you will name the editor who reviewed and approved your edit in the edit summary.

These editing restrictions shall remain in place for a period of one year from this date, after which your editing history will be reviewed to determine if the restrictions should be extended, modified or lifted. If any aspect of the above editing restrictions is unclear, let me know and I will clarify them. You are free to remove this notice from your talk page along with any other notices or warnings with the exception of your most recent unblock request. However, be aware that the restrictions remain in place until such time as you are informed by someone with arbitration enforcement competency that they have been modified or removed. This measure is being taken with great reluctance. However based on your editing history, which has included multiple blocks based on WP:CIR concerns, it appears to be the only step short of an indefinite block that will curb your poor editing habits. Finally these restrictions are being logged at WP:AEL and any breach may result in your being blocked, very likely indefinitely. -Ad Orientem (talk) 01:13, 20 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

There is a list of unreviewed drafts on the userpage. Legacypac (talk) 23:48, 30 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Article formatting edit

I know you aren't going to listen, but I'll try anyway. Don't link to countries in the lead (Spanish, not Spanish), and use an en dash (–) in the infobox for year ranges, not regular dashes (so, 2010–2011, not 2010-2011). Nehme1499 23:59, 2 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Nehme1499:, From now on I will remember those two opieces of info for all my articles. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 00:07, 3 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
Also remember to add club and league categories, and the correct "X expatriate sportspeople in Y" categories. And there is no need to add what the player said when he signed for the club. Nehme1499 00:11, 3 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Can you please stop adding useless parameters to infoboxes? See this for an example. I removed the parameters that are of no use whatsoever, most footballers don't have American college careers etc. Also, it's lost to be why you put 1998 as the career end in Freiburg when the source clearly says 1999. Geschichte (talk) 10:25, 1 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Another problem is that you make up names "second division", "third division" etc when for instance the First Division is the second tier in many countries. The solution is; use "tier" instead of "division". Geschichte (talk) 10:27, 1 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Júnior Batista edit

  Hello, Das osmnezz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Júnior Batista, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 13 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started edit

Hello, Das osmnezz

Thank you for creating Dinesh Chhetri.

User:MPGuy2824, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

see if the other sources from Wangay Dorji are valid for this article

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 12:32, 1 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Drafts edit

Please stop moving articles from draft space when they are not ready. Please let them stay in draft space until they are ready. On Fernelly Castillo, you only added 1 club and one year (2016) to the infobox. One year is not a career... NFT, which you did include in the article, states 4 clubs over 10 years. Maybe you forgot to add it, maybe you thought somebody else should do that, either way the articles are back in article space now. Geschichte (talk) 22:19, 10 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Geschichte:, Ok I will do that from now on. I edited the articlews where there were clubs missing. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 23:42, 10 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ricki Bardes Leurima for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ricki Bardes Leurima is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ricki Bardes Leurima until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Geschichte (talk) 22:28, 10 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Waseem Isaacs moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Waseem Isaacs, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Shirt58 (talk) 09:22, 29 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Luka Gugeshashvili edit

Hello, Das osmnezz,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username John B123 and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Luka Gugeshashvili, for deletion, because a consensus decision previously decided that it wasn't suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. If you wish to restore a page deleted via a deletion discussion, please use the deletion review process instead, rather than reposting the content of the page.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|John B123}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

John B123 (talk) 10:18, 6 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Nauris Petkevičius edit

 

A tag has been placed on Draft:Nauris Petkevičius requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Empty page

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Digiuserca (talk) 12:27, 6 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Djehani N'Guissan edit

  Hello, Das osmnezz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Djehani N'Guissan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:04, 7 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Mohammed Al-Qahtani (footballer, born March 2002) for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mohammed Al-Qahtani (footballer, born March 2002) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed Al-Qahtani (footballer, born March 2002) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nehme1499 08:58, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for March 18 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cemal Yilmaz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Willem II.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 18 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Palyers from Greek football edit

Hello!

Can you create pages for these players?:

Thank you very much! GRanemos1 (talk) 12:31, 3 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Kazuki Takahashi (footballer, born 1996) edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Kazuki Takahashi (footballer, born 1996) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 17:59, 3 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Jorge Durán for deletion

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jorge Durán is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jorge Durán until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BRDude70 (talk) 23:57, 6 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Ziv Arie edit

  Hello, Das osmnezz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ziv Arie, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:01, 10 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Hamidou Tangara edit

 

The article Hamidou Tangara has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

4th and 5th tier participation does not automatically grant notability for players. Article has to satisfy general notability as per WP:BASIC. Database entries no longer qualify as sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Whiteguru (talk) 05:00, 20 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

  • You have removed the PROD tag from this article, claiming he has played in a FIFA match. The article provides no evidence to this effect. Again, you are advised the following: What is needed are references from significant coverage about this player, and not their own words; in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. Lists, Team rosters, pages listing matches and results, databases, Instagram, Soccerway, Facebook, none of these are reliable sources. (There have been changes to the notability guide for sports - see WP:NSPORT ) Lists and results - as provided here - are no longer reliable sources. WP:SIRS is your guide. --Whiteguru (talk) 22:22, 29 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Johnsen Bacuna edit

Hello, Das osmnezz,

Thank you for creating Johnsen Bacuna.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article's references do not satisfy notability for Sport. Therefore, this article needs to satisfy general notability, WP:GNG. What is needed are references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources. A more comprehensive guide is WP:SOURCES ... Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact referred to, that meet these tough criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion. Kindly do the needful. Thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 05:13, 22 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Gonzalo Abascal edit

Hello, Das osmnezz,

Thank you for creating Gonzalo Abascal.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article's references do not satisfy notability for Sport. Therefore, this article needs to satisfy general notability, WP:GNG.
What is needed are references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources. A more comprehensive guide is WP:SOURCES ... Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact referred to, that meet these tough criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion. Kindly do the needful. Thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 05:14, 22 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Chao Ming-hsiu edit

Hello, Das osmnezz,

Thank you for creating Chao Ming-hsiu.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article's references do not satisfy notability for Sport. Therefore, this article needs to satisfy general notability, WP:GNG.

What is needed are references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources. A more comprehensive guide is WP:SOURCES ... Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact referred to, that meet these tough criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion. Kindly do the needful. Thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 05:15, 22 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Gustavo Hemkemeier edit

Hello, Das osmnezz,

Thank you for creating Gustavo Hemkemeier.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This is a semi professional league. This article will need more references to satisfy general notabilty (ie, more information about this person.
What is needed are references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources. A more comprehensive guide is WP:SOURCES ... Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact referred to, that meet these tough criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion. Kindly do the needful. Thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 06:45, 22 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Patrickson Delgado edit

Hello, Das osmnezz,

Thank you for creating Patrickson Delgado.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

What is needed are references from significant coverage about this player, and not their own words; in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources. A more comprehensive guide is WP:SOURCES ... Providing sufficient references, ideally giving more information about this player, that meet these criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion. Kindly do the needful. Thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 10:20, 23 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Chan Sze Chun edit

Hello, Das osmnezz,

Thank you for creating Chan Sze Chun.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

What is needed are references from significant coverage about this player, and not their own words; in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. Lists, Team rosters, Soccerway, Instagram, Facebook, none of these are reliable sources. (There have been changes to the notability guide for sports - see WP:NSPORT ) You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources. A more comprehensive guide is WP:SOURCES ... Providing sufficient references, ideally giving more information about this player, that meet these criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 21:21, 25 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Firuz Bobiev edit

Hello, Das osmnezz,

Thank you for creating Firuz Bobiev.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

What is needed are references from significant coverage about this player, and not their own words; in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. Lists, Team rosters, Soccerway, Instagram, Facebook, none of these are reliable sources. (There have been changes to the notability guide for sports - see WP:NSPORT ) You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources. A more comprehensive guide is WP:SOURCES ... Providing sufficient references, ideally giving more information about this player, that meet these criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 06:24, 26 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve François Hapipi edit

Hello, Das osmnezz,

Thank you for creating François Hapipi.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

What is needed are references from significant coverage about this player, and not their own words; in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. Lists, Team rosters, Soccerway, Instagram, Facebook, none of these are reliable sources. (There have been changes to the notability guide for sports - see WP:NSPORT ) You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources. A more comprehensive guide is WP:SOURCES ... Providing sufficient references, ideally giving more information about this player, that meet these criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the topic is not suitable for inclusion. Kindly do the needful. Thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 07:23, 26 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Liam McCabe edit

Hello, Das osmnezz,

Thank you for creating Liam McCabe.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

What is needed are references from significant coverage about this player, and not their own words; in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. Lists, Team rosters, pages listing matches and results, databases, Soccerway, Instagram, Facebook, none of these are reliable sources. (There have been changes to the notability guide for sports - see WP:NSPORT ) You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources. A more comprehensive guide is WP:SOURCES ... Providing sufficient references, ideally giving more information about this player, that meet these criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that this article is not suitable for inclusion.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 03:56, 28 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Chiu Chung Man edit

Hello, Das osmnezz,

Thank you for creating Chiu Chung Man.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

What is needed are references from significant coverage about this player, and not their own words; in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. Lists, Team rosters, pages listing matches and results, databases, Soccerway, Instagram, Facebook, none of these are reliable sources. (There have been changes to the notability guide for sports - see WP:NSPORT ) You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources. A more comprehensive guide is WP:SOURCES ... Providing sufficient references, ideally giving more information about this player, that meet these criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that this article is not suitable for inclusion.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 03:57, 28 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Noam Cohen (footballer) edit

Hello, Das osmnezz,

Thank you for creating Noam Cohen (footballer).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

What is needed are references from significant coverage about this player, and not their own words; in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. Lists, Team rosters, pages listing matches and results, databases, Instagram, Soccerway, Facebook, none of these are reliable sources. (There have been changes to the notability guide for sports - see WP:NSPORT ) You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources. A more comprehensive guide is WP:SOURCES ... Providing sufficient references, ideally giving more information about this player, that meet these criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that this article is not suitable for inclusion

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 02:14, 29 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Michał Lewandowski edit

 

The article Michał Lewandowski has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable athlete with trivial coverage

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. agtx 05:04, 29 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Michał Lewandowski for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michał Lewandowski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michał Lewandowski until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

agtx 11:45, 29 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Just wanted to give you a heads up that WP:NFOOTBALL has been deleted by community consensus. Playing in a professional match isn't enough to demonstrate notability. agtx 12:15, 29 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Jason Gorskie edit

Hello, Das osmnezz,

Thank you for creating Jason Gorskie.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

What is needed are references from significant coverage about this player, and not their own words; in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. Lists, Team rosters, pages listing matches and results, databases, Instagram, Soccerway, 90minute, Facebook, none of these are reliable sources. (There have been changes to the notability guide for sports - see WP:NSPORT ) You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources. A more comprehensive guide is WP:SOURCES ... Providing sufficient references, ideally giving more information about this player, that meet these criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that this article is not suitable for inclusion.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 16:11, 29 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Peter Anosike edit

Hello, Das osmnezz,

Thank you for creating Peter Anosike.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

What is needed are references from significant coverage about this player, and not their own words; in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. Lists, Team rosters, pages listing matches and results, databases, Instagram, Facebook, none of these are reliable sources. (There have been changes to the notability guide for sports - see WP:NSPORT ) You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources. A more comprehensive guide is WP:SOURCES ... Providing sufficient references, ideally giving more information about this player, that meet these criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that this article is not suitable for inclusion. Kindly do the needful. Thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 21:03, 1 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Denis Darbellay edit

Hello, Das osmnezz,

Thank you for creating Denis Darbellay.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

What is needed are references from significant coverage about this player, and not their own words; in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. Lists, Team rosters, pages listing matches and results, databases, Instagram, Soccerway, Facebook, none of these are reliable sources. (There have been changes to the notability guide for sports - see WP:NSPORT ) You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources. A more comprehensive guide is WP:SOURCES ... Providing sufficient references, ideally giving more information about this player, that meet these criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that this article is not suitable for inclusion. Kindly do the needful. Thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 21:53, 3 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Siam Yapp edit

Hello, Das osmnezz,

Thank you for creating Siam Yapp.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article needs more references in order to provide significant coverage for this article. See WP:SIGCOV
References that have scores, lists, order of merit and video do not pass as reliable sources for WP:NSPORT. (There have been changes to the notability guide for sports - you may wish to read WP:NSPORT ) To meet notability requirements, one more reference with significant coverage will suffice. Thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 21:57, 3 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Mateusz Oszmaniec edit

Hello, Das osmnezz,

Thank you for creating Mateusz Oszmaniec.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article does not meet notability for sports.
What is needed are references from significant coverage about this player, and not their own words; in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. Lists, Team rosters, pages listing matches and results, databases, Instagram, Soccerway, Facebook, none of these are reliable sources. (There have been changes to the notability guide for sports - see WP:NSPORT ) You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources. A more comprehensive guide is WP:SOURCES ... Providing sufficient references, ideally giving more information about this player, that meet these criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that this article is not suitable for inclusion.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 09:40, 4 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Yousef Samy edit

Hello, Das osmnezz,

Thank you for creating Yousef Samy.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article does not meet notability for sports.
What is needed are references from significant coverage about this player, and not their own words; in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. Lists, Team rosters, pages listing matches and results, databases, Instagram, Soccerway, Facebook, none of these are reliable sources. (There have been changes to the notability guide for sports - see WP:NSPORT ) You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources. A more comprehensive guide is WP:SOURCES ... Providing sufficient references, ideally giving more information about this player, that meet these criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that this article is not suitable for inclusion.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 09:41, 4 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Erik Hummel edit

Hello, Das osmnezz,

Thank you for creating Erik Hummel.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

What is needed are references from significant coverage about this player, and not their own words; in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. Lists, Team rosters, pages listing matches and results, databases, Instagram, Soccerway, Facebook, none of these are reliable sources. (There have been changes to the notability guide for sports - see WP:NSPORT ) You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources. A more comprehensive guide is WP:SOURCES ... Providing sufficient references, ideally giving more information about this player, that meet these criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that this article is not suitable for inclusion. Kindly do the needful. Thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 21:54, 4 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Kabir Kohli edit

Hello, Das osmnezz,

Thank you for creating Kabir Kohli.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

What is needed are references from significant coverage about this player, and not their own words; in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. Lists, Team rosters, pages listing matches and results, databases, Instagram, Soccerway, Facebook, none of these are reliable sources. (There have been changes to the notability guide for sports - see WP:NSPORT ) You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources. A more comprehensive guide is WP:SOURCES ... Providing sufficient references, ideally giving more information about this player, that meet these criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that this article is not suitable for inclusion.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 08:20, 5 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Ziv Arie edit

 

Hello, Das osmnezz. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ziv Arie".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:29, 8 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started edit

Hello, Das osmnezz

Thank you for creating Uchechukwu Uwakwe.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 11:28, 12 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Paolo Benetti edit

  Hello, Das osmnezz. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Paolo Benetti, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:01, 12 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Dooh Moukoko for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dooh Moukoko is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dooh Moukoko until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 06:33, 17 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Hari McCoy edit

Hello, Das osmnezz,

Thank you for creating Hari McCoy.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

What is needed are references from significant coverage about this player, and not their own words; in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. Lists, Team rosters, pages listing matches and results, databases, Instagram, Soccerway, Twitter, Facebook, none of these are reliable sources. (There have been changes to the notability guide for sports - see WP:NSPORT ) You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources. A more comprehensive guide is WP:SOURCES ... Providing sufficient references, ideally giving more information about this player, that meet these criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that this article is not suitable for inclusion.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 10:10, 17 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Sepetaio Nokisi for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sepetaio Nokisi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sepetaio Nokisi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 22:42, 23 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Chiu Chung Man moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Chiu Chung Man, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (t · c) buidhe 20:14, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ariel Stoltz for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ariel Stoltz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ariel Stoltz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

— rsjaffe 🗣️ 23:20, 24 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Chiu Chung Man moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Chiu Chung Man, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 23:09, 25 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started edit

Hello, Das osmnezz

Thank you for creating Chan Sze Chun.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 15:38, 30 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Mlondi Mdluli edit

Hello, Das osmnezz,

Thank you for creating Mlondi Mdluli.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Dates do not add up

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Devonian Wombat}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Devonian Wombat (talk) 22:51, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Orion Mills edit

 

The article Orion Mills has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Ⓜ️hawk10 (talk) 05:10, 7 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Farid Benramdane for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Farid Benramdane is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farid Benramdane until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Paul Vaurie (talk) 04:39, 8 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Gavin Turner edit

 

The article Gavin Turner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability found, only passing mentions or posts from related sources (like "Black and Red United").

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 10:37, 13 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Gavin Turner for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gavin Turner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gavin Turner until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 06:39, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Trevor James (football manager) edit

Hello, Das osmnezz,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Xx236, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged Trevor James (football manager) for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative. Also, you may want to consider working on future articles in draft space first, where they cannot be deleted for lacking content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Xx236}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Xx236 (talk) 11:01, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Frank-Petter Kval for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frank-Petter Kval is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank-Petter Kval until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

PMC(talk) 14:53, 19 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Caps edit

Please remember that WP:NFOOTY is not longer a policy and the number of caps a player has is no longer weighed in deletion discussions. -- Guerillero Parlez Moi 10:29, 29 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started edit

Hello, Das osmnezz

Thank you for creating Sherzod Fayziev.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 13:05, 1 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Raymondson Azemard for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raymondson Azemard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymondson Azemard until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:59, 6 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Cyril Bagnost for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cyril Bagnost is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cyril Bagnost until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 10:35, 15 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Have a barnstar! edit

  The Barnstar of Diligence
I think you deserve a barnstar for finding plenty of references to prove the notability of Samuela Vula. Nice job,the article can now be greatly improved. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 21:11, 18 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Pascal Estrada edit

Hello, Das osmnezz, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Chris troutman, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Pascal Estrada, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pascal Estrada.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Chris troutman}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Chris Troutman (talk) 13:52, 21 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of James Barrigan for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Barrigan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Barrigan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:18, 22 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Tristan Hodge for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tristan Hodge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tristan Hodge until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:27, 22 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Orion Mills for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Orion Mills is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orion Mills until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 02:34, 22 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Oscar Amaro for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oscar Amaro is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oscar Amaro until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 18:37, 22 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Michael Mulder (footballer) edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Michael Mulder (footballer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Valenciano (talk) 10:29, 25 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your behavior at AFDs edit

Hello, Das osmnezz,

I was reviewing AFD discussions closing today and saw some criticism of you on the AFD log. Specifically, please do not "refbomb" deletion discussions by listing dozens of low quality sources. Editors do not have the time to check all of these sources and it just frustrates them when they take time to read over your statement to look at bad sources that do not support Wikipedia's notability standards. It wastes their time and has the affect of them not taking your comments, now and in the future, seriously as if you do not understand what GNG requires.

It's better to list 2 or 3 high quality sources that demonstrate your argument in an individual's notability than to list dozens of sources that do not. I'm sure that your goal is to preserve articles that you are arguing "Keep" for and posting a convincing and concise statement to that effect will lead to more success in this pursuit. Don't overwhelm other editors, be considerate of their time and work on being convinving with the exact information that will change their minds about the status of article. Good luck. Liz Read! Talk! 02:34, 29 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Liz: Thanks I will keep that in mind for future AFD discussions. From now on, I definitely will not put as many sources as before, like for example the discussion about Tristan Hodge where I put 20+ sources. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 03:40, 29 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Infobox stats edit

Please note that we only include domestic league games in the infobox - so no Cup or Continental matches etc. Please also ensure that when you update the stats you also update the date, using ~~~~~. If you have any questions please ask. GiantSnowman 14:00, 31 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Recent articles edit

Please do a search of a topic before creating articles; you have created 2 or 3 that have already been in draft in my user space. GiantSnowman 18:30, 31 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Tio Cipot edit

You do realize that making one appearance in a fully-pro league does NOT justify the article anymore since WP:NFOOTY has been abolished months ago, and now the player must pass significiant independent coverage per WP:GNG, right? Snowflake91 (talk) 09:13, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Allon Williams for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Allon Williams is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allon Williams until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:26, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Triston Sandy for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Triston Sandy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Triston Sandy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:32, 11 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Jarrell Arnold for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jarrell Arnold is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jarrell Arnold until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 15:38, 13 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Salih Yildiz edit

 

The article Salih Yildiz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:SIGCOV

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:43, 14 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Rayed Derbali for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rayed Derbali is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rayed Derbali until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 17:50, 14 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

August 2022 edit

Your recent creations, such as Filip Jörgensen and Armando Shashoua are not up to standards and may be speedy deleted. Please read WP:GNG before creating a page. BRDude70 (talk) 21:36, 14 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

These edits are clearly not vandalism. I would retract the comment @BrazilianDude70 Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:43, 14 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Sportsfan 1234: I assume you're not the one who has to waste time fixing his creations... Happy now? BRDude70 (talk) 21:44, 14 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Fixing a creation does not equal vandalism. If you think the articles should be deleted, take it to WP:AFD, which I have done with literally tens, if not hundreds of soccer articles in the last few months. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:46, 14 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Nangee Philip for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nangee Philip is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nangee Philip until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:22, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Óscar Linton for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Óscar Linton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Óscar Linton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 03:22, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Comment at AfD edit

Hi Das osmnezz. At a recent AfD, you commented "I feel like the nominator specifically tries to delete only football articles en masse for no reason". That's an example of commenting on the contributor, not the content, which is the opposite of what our policy on not making personal attacks requires. If you have serious concerns with another editor's behavior, the place to discuss that is at their talk page, or at the administrator noticeboard if absolutely necessary. Happy editing, Vanamonde (Talk) 11:10, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Vanamonde93:, I realized that, and have not made that kind of comment since. Sorry about that. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 14:54, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Christian Okonkwo edit

Hi, I was looking at the article Christian Okonkwo and I wondered what you meant by "Plying his trade in Change Management with FC Belize..." I don't understand what you mean about change management. It doesn't say anything about that in any of the article's references but perhaps I'm missing something so perhaps you could offer some insight. Appreciate you wrote it five years ago so you may not remember! Cheers. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 17:57, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

@MarchOfTheGreyhounds:, The last revision after the last time I edited Christian Okonkwo did not have Change Management in there so some other editor must have put it in there. I have no idea why though. Sorry for the lack of clarification. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 18:12, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Oh, quite right, my mistake. I'll just remove it then, since it appears to be nonsense. MarchOfTheGreyhounds (talk) 18:30, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply